- Eiko Fried added an answer:85How is ResearchGate dealing with copyright issues when posting our papers?I am wondering if there are any copyright issues when we post our published papers on ResearchGate? Is there any rule we should follow or we can simply upload the papers and hope that we do not really break the publisher's copyrights. I will be more than happy to know more about this.
Here's my take: there are a lot of researchers out there. We work in a system that is acknowledged from all sides to be broken:
- I write papers
- My colleagues review them
- I have to pay large amounts of money for open access publications, and even in closed access journals I have to pay a large amount for color figures
- The publishers sell the work back to my University for a lot of money. In fact, just a few days ago I published a paper and had to ask on Facebook for people to send me the full text because I don't have access to the journal (!).
Here is my recommendation: always upload all your final papers on your website and researchgate. Make sure to note somewhere that this is not for mass dissemination but just for students and colleagues. The worst that could happen is that a publisher actually writes you an email and asks you to take a publication down ... so be it. But they will not do that because they are happy that the papers are read and cited (we know that open access papers generate more publications, given that everything else is equal).
Let's fight for the right to get our things online. It's silly that many of us are funded by tax payers, but tax payers can't actually read the final work because they have no access to University libraries and so forth.
If we all put everything online, it will change the system over time. Elsevier will note write 150.000 researchers and ask them to remove papers from their websites...Following
- Michael Mühle added an answer:6Does anyone have experience with publishing in the Journal of AIDS and Clinical Research form the proteomics group?I cannot find it in the official lists of Thomson Reuters or similar databases and the impact factor listed on their webpage is based on citations of their articles but an unofficial one.
As far as I know this is an theoretical Impact factor the journal states on its website but based on their own article metrics of the publishing/citation ratio.Following
- Iolanda-Gabriela Craifaleanu added an answer:5How many of you are on twitter?1) list your profile(s) in your comment - I am @scigrrlz and @acdbio
2) follow other community members who post or tweet #science2point0
3) tweet #science2point0 and see how big the reach of this community is on twitter
I find twitter a great tool for keeping up with hot science news, colleagues, tracking meetings, following funding agencies and other organizations. What do you use it for?Following
- Damien Parrello added an answer:99+Would you publish your negative results? If no, why?Do you agree with the article below regarding the value of negative results?
I defined them in the first sentence. My bad, I did not put NNI in brackets. I will modify this.
You should not judge us too quickly. I attached with this comment the link of our twitter and facebook account. You will see that we actively support the AllTrials campaign which calls on governments, regulators and research bodies to implement measures to publish all clinical trials. And we are officially one of their suppoters (http://www.alltrials.net/supporters/organisations/). Also, you will see, yesterday, we made an engagement: 5% of the 2016 turnover will be donated to support the publication of NNI results in medecine. Then, $200 is not comparable to the normal cost of open access journal. As you saw on our website, we did a lot of work and bring a reflection to dynamize this forgotten side of science. We really want to promote these neglected but so important results. You cannot say that we are here to make money. It is unfair.
Then, Data Journal is very young. It was launched less than one month ago. We did the right thing to be referenced but it takes time.
To show you that we are here to drive science forward and not full our pocket, I give to your lab your 50 first articles. I let you do the math...
I hope we could show with time who we are. In few days, we will make an announcement about what we planned to do in 2017 to further research thanks to NNI results. Also, we will put our blog online soon with different articles that show our vision and our work.Following
- Manohar Khirbat added an answer:95What is the range of percentage similarity of plagiarism for a review article?Especially when using a plagiarism detecting software.
I think Similarity percentage permitted is more applicable to Scholarly research papers.For review papers It may not that much applicable. But better avoid copying.Following
- TheParesh N. Naik added an answer:93How to publish a scientific paper?This is a platform where we got ideas from wide range of researchers. One of the challenge in science is how to publish your work. It has been observed that some researchers have depth knowledge in their field and working hard from number of years, despite all hard work they are unable to publish papers. Though satisfaction is important but research publication is also important. This way your research reach to your target audience. I would appreciate if you advice how to publish paper in scientific journals. Please write problems you are facing in publishing your research, it is possible that some of experienced researchers may provide solution to your problems. Experts' are requested to give their advice on this subject.
" 291 " PUBLICATIONS till Now.*Following
- Veronica Bender Haydu added an answer:30Which online tools do you use for open science?Do you share your research ideas openly with others? Do you make your research process transparent? Do you make your research findings accessible?
If so, which online tools are useful?
I share my academic work with:
1. Personal blog
2. Scientific social networks (Academici, ResearchGate)
3. Institucional Bolg
4. General social networks (Facebook)
Thank you for spreading so many interesting ways.Following
- Luis Omar Alvarez Mures added an answer:26Has anyone experience in reading scientific papers with e-readers (kindle)?Guess, this is not a very subject specific question. However: I don't like reading papers on my computer screen, but don't want to print them out. What is your experience with e-readers for paper reading (esp. the kindle)? Is there a possibility to mark text passages (e. g. underlining)
The paperwhite is a great reading experience. I have had great success with k2pdfopt to optimize pdfs for paperwhite. What I haven't been able to do in an automated way is being able to highlight in mobi/azw format. Highlighting on reflowed text is not a great experience, so being able to convert properly PDF to MOBI/AZW would be the holy grail. The main problem when converting to these formats are vector graphics, there is no free solution for rasterizing all of the vector graphics in a pdf, and this is necessary so text and vectors are not screwed in the conversion.
For me the best solution is k2pdfopt, but it has some caveats, it is not a perfect experience.Following
- Markus Leibeling added an answer:40What kind of software and online services are research labs using for social collaboration, and project, knowledge and lab management?There is a wide variety of cloud-based and locally installable software tools available for potentially enhancing the output of a research lab. These include (with examples): project management (Basecamp), wikis (Confluence), microblogging (Yammer), document management (Skydox), reference management (Mendeley), scientific collaboration platforms (colwiz), general online collaboration platforms (Zoho), e-notebooks (Labvantage), laboratory management systems (CambridgeSoft) and instant messaging (Skype).
We are currently looking to improve the way we work in our lab regarding communication and data management. Being an academic research unit of about 80 people studying nanophotonics, we are currently generating huge amounts of data on network drives and paper notebooks, and communicating in a semi-random fashion. Everyone is using their own tools. Clearly there is much room for improvement, or is there?
So, the question is, what kind of software services are other labs using? How did you identify the needs of the users, selected the tool and got everyone to use it?
We've been using LabSuit as chemical database and order system. It really simplifies the daily laboratory work for synthetic groups in particular, since the interface is very intuitive. You can set up a database from scratch or simply import an excel file which was very convenient in our case. In addition, the laboratories of participating groups can be connected, to share chemicals or other equipment. Of course it is possible to restrict the informations, you are willing to share. In Israel, the whole Schulich faculty (Technion) and many other labs in the country used this software. It was even possible to order chemicals from different universities and the LabSuit team would take care to ship the material within few days to your lab (such things can only work in small countries like Israel, of course, but it was a nice gimmick). Last and most important, LabSuit is connected to chemical suppliers that allowed to compare prices with just one click and finally order the compound by sending a request to the corresponding supplier and to the service cost centre of your university.Following
- Rolando Garcia-Milian added an answer:2Interesting open access modelPay $259 once and publish as many papers as you want
The fee is for publishing not for accessing the article- access to the article is free. The fee for publishing is pretty decent considering that many open access journals ask researchers for thousands of dollars just for publishing their articles, while at the same time they have to contribute all their referee/peer review work to the publisher for free.
- Ansu Thomas added an answer:15What is a good reference managing softwarei've checked a lot of these reference managing software, but what shall one see before using one.
With all the options available in the market, which one addresses to all the requirements of a good reference manager.
are open source alternatives any better than their premium peers.
In menteley we can directly insert the bibilography alsoFollowing
- S. B. Kiwne added an answer:3What is ICV? How does it relate to impact factor?-
what islong form of ICV of research journalFollowing
- 2Do you use electronic lab books ?Do you use a wiki or similar tools for your daily lab work? What are your experiences ?
I recently made a simple electronic lab book, http://wixtend.com, that supports collaborative project development and sharingFollowing
- 4How do you organize your paper writing ?I used to send out files with Versions (V0.1, V0.2, ... ), but now i switched to google documents (or wave) for collaborative writing. In the end stages I use ResearchGate REstory for synchronizing versions.
By using google documents no version conflict occurs, however, regarding tables, pictures and so on, google documents is not "compatible enough" for final layout.
For reference managing we type manually authorYEAR during the google document stage of the paper while in the end stage we use Zotero with online synchronized databases.
I like to develop my projects on http://wixtend.com and then draft formal papers using DropBox + MendeleyFollowing
- 2Which E-Publishing Software do you use?Tell us which software you use in your daily work for your (open access) e-publishing.
I use http://wixtend.com. It's as easy as editing WikipediaFollowing
- 3Online CollaborationI am presently engaged in a research project in Calcutta, India, after completing my master course in biochemistry.
I am going to address a serious topic here especially to higher ranked professionals and also to students of my category.
I understand the dearth of research collaboration all through out the world between the researchers individually or through institutes/universities. If the research works are shared more then I think science will progress at a much much faster rate.
Just like if two people share ideas among themselves, the gross idea of each individual increases and thinking of both rises to a higher level and have wider directions.
Regarding collaboration I know there are some important factors like secret of scientific works until published, publications, individual copyright etc needs to be considered but isn't these points a bit cheaper in front of greater scientific progress? (giving due respect to existing regulations in scientific research).
It's not only just about collaboration relating a particular topic between two laboratories. what I mean to say is that can't the collaboration level rises to a higher level?
Can't research or for that matter papers or publications be created by/between researchers sitting far apart from each other but by sharing pieces of individual biological ideas, research works.
Isn't the pace of scientific progress slow? perhaps one of the reason may be lack of collaborations between researchers.
I think I have made my views pretty clear by now. I do not want the researchers to deviate from their original works but only want much more collaborations between the scientists performing similar research work. and more research being carried out and shared between individuals especially in the world where all can be easily accessible through world wide web, that is internet.
why can't a PhD scholar apart from doing his/her own work also contribute to/ collaborate through internet with other members to give rise to new work in similar or related fields?
My direct issue is that why can't groups of group members be formed and share their dry lab work or/and wet lab (as per time, conditions and infrastructure permits) together to give rise to new publications and thus contributing very faster to scientific world. Does it always need to be a part/member of same lab?
why can't an online forum/ group be formed where the datas of the experiments of individual researcher may be shared may be in a secret way for particular experiments and there is a guide supervising it and in the same way publications can also be made.?
I have written a lot.
I want views, discussions and suggestions from scientists as well as students about how this can be conducted efficiently and it's pros and cons.
I agree with you. I think we need a centralized project development site where researchers can not only share but also develop, their projects in a collaborative fashion. I recently made a site, http://wixtend.com, that does this; hopefully it catches onFollowing
- 6How to find negative data that helps you to avoid performing the same experiment twice?As a scientist I am most concerned about not wasting time.
Given that, at any given moment, other scientists (somewhere) are working on projects that are similar to our research, it is very likely that parts of our results will be also similar. Experiments work (hypotheses are proved) or do not work (hypotheses are disproved). We take it for granted that positive results (experiments that worked and prove something) will be published at some point in the near future (be it by us or by others). Publication of such experiments is hard enough, takes time and presently peer-review is organizing the publication process.
Importantly though, what we will not and will, probably, never know is this: which experiments did not work or did disprove a given hypothesis. Such knowledge would be very important for us, indeed. Because it will certainly be helpful to know (before starting out on a new project or deciding on a direction to continue a running project) that somebody has failed (somewhere) on the same or a related project. This would save not only time but also resources.
Maybe, some negative data will be published. Maybe. The reality is that editors do not like to "waste" space in their journals. Where to go then? Increasingly, comments on publications are allowed but obviously one has to go to the journal, to the article and to the comments section. But does your failed experiment have anything to do with the paper you are commenting on? Alternatively, you might talk to other scientists at meetings. Or you might hope that some website like ResearchGate or Academia.edu will connect you with scientists and their (negative data) knowledge. Well, this is the idealistic approach but right now, I do not see an incentive for scientists to share such (negative) data on these websites.
Therefore my question: What format, beyond the comments section of journals or the establishment of journals that publish negative results, can you think of to extract the hidden knowledge of failed experiments from your fellow researchers. Knowledge, which might allow you to fine-tune or to abandon an approach to a scientific question because somebody else has asked it, performed experiments and gave up on it for good reason.
Perhaps a collaborative research database, where researchers can log project developments and not just the final outcome, could be of help. A new site that serves this purpose is http://wixtend.com.
I think researchers can be unmotivated to draft a write-up of negative results; however, if researchers are publicizing info throughout the whole research process, then a write-up will exist regardless of whether the results are positive or negative.Following
- 7A talented young student is enrolling in your research group, what supporting tools would you recommend as a starting kit?To be more specific, let us cover, at least, the following segments: (a) planning and task management tools, with emphasis for web-based ones; (b) diagraming tools to convey, discuss and share ideas; (c) co-authoring and referencing management tools.
A collaborative research database, such as http://wixtend.com, could be of help.Following
- 7How can we use social media to amplify our research and knowledge sharing?Here is a presentation slides to a 1/2 day seminar I will be giving at Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) on the 28th June, 2013. Your thoughts, experiences and ideas on this topic would be highly appreciated. Still in ultra learning mode :)
I recently created a site, http://wixtend.com, where researchers of all levels can collaboratively develop and share projects. It's not busy yet (and it's only a month old), but I hope that it will be a useful tool to amplify research and knowledge sharing.Following
- Neal Haddaway added an answer:23Google scholar for systematic reviews: what limit on search returns?Are any researchers who are undertaking systematic reviews also adding a search of google.scholar? And if so, what numerical limit are you putting on results that you inspect? In some earlier trials, I found that scholar returned in the order of at least 10x more results than did the more usual sources (like Medline) which I feel would then artificially distort the number of excluded articles in your flow diagram of articles to be included.
I have a methods paper on this exact subject in review at the moment and a practical application manuscript also in review. Send me a message if you would like to see drafts. In summary (for environmental sciences systematic reviews):
1. GS only displays the first 1,000 search results and the ordering of these results is not clear. GS is therefore not suitable as a standalone resource and it's use in a SR is not in keeping with the need for transparency and repeatability.
2. Title-only searches obviously yield fewer results, but a higher proportion is grey literature than full-text results. So the utility of and ideal search settings in GS depend on what you are using GS for: grey or academic. Grey literature occurs mostly around the 200-300th results (pages 20-30) so searching the first 50-100 results (as often seen in env management SRs) is a poor practice if grey literature is the target.
3. We have developed a method to download and extract as citations these first 1,000 results, making the search process transparent and updatable. (request our methods paper for this process)
4. Similar searches in GS and Web of Science yield poorly overlapping results (especially where results are far larger than the first 1,000 displayed). GS is therefore a useful addition to traditional searching.
We conclude that GS is a useful addition to traditional SR searches, and that new methods allow transparency and updatability using GS.
- Rizwan Faisal added an answer:5Free Manuscript submissionDear All,
Please suggest me any scientific journal to submit free manuscript.
I have written a paper on HIV coreceptor variation but unable to publish it as idont have enough financial support.
archives of iranian medicine is an impact factor free journalFollowing
- Sadek Amami added an answer:9How can I determine if a journal in which I have published supports "self-archiving"?I would like to provide copies of papers I have published, but I do not wish to violate the rights of the journal or the copyright laws. I would welcome the experience others have had in answering this questionFollowing
- Manuel Morales added an answer:23What are the best scientific papers on impact of science 2.0 (open science, citizen science, data-intensive science)?I'm looking for evidence that the science 2.0 really changes the way we do science today (in positive and negative sense). Can we prove that the change already took place? If yes, in what areas? Does it happen only in natural sciences? More information on our study on http://science20study.wordpress.com/
"What are the best scientific papers on impact of science 2.0 (open science, citizen science, data-intensive science)? "
A: Science based on unambiguous empirical evidence.
Case in point, the "Flawed Scientific Method" document was designed to go with the public invitation to help science self-correct. In essence, this one page document illustrates for the public the mechanics of the discovery of Einstein's nonlocal hidden variables which in turn revealed how the scientific method is flawed and how to fix it (see "A Flawed Scientific Method" below).Following
- Fidele Ntie-Kang added an answer:99+Hi, I am a science writer from Brazil. I am going to write about Researchgate, so I would be glad if could answer me:Why have you enjoyed to this network and what are the major bennefits from it?
-RG also creates a forum where young researchers can be mentored by more experienced researchers.
-It creates a forum for exchange of data and knowledge between researchers who may never meet in real life.Following
- Mamoon Rashid added an answer:4centrifugeDear all
How we can calculate the rpm from xg in centrifuge? Please help me
Most of the centrifuge instruments are equipped with modes to switch between RPM to RCF. Do the math, but please check with what the instrument displays.Following
- Rishabh Shrivastava added an answer:8Does anyone have experience with research on altmetrics - which datasets?
I would like to get an overview which datasets the community uses when working with altmetrics and whether they are publicly available. Also, are there any "standard" datasets? Do you think such datasets would drive research further?
Do you suggest that altmterics is associated with social media metrics only? Because most of the studies have been conducted on Mendeley readership and CiteUlike etc. I find they are not pure social media sites. I think popular social medi sites such as Facebook and Research Gate happen to be less explored. Won't it be too early to call it social media metrics?Following
- Gregg W. Etter added an answer:1Would you do an AudioSlide presentation for your published article on ScienceDirect?Some journals on ScienceDirect started to offer this new service, How would that reflect on the merit of the article?
I watched an AudioSlide presentation on identification of human remains in a mass casualty incident the other day. It was a little dry, but extremely informative. I got something out of it and thought that my time was well spent.Following
- Susan Mazer added an answer:3I so appreciate this opportunity to join you in this dialogue!! I have been involved with a new open access journal that has not yet launched.How do OA journals deal with liability issues such as plagiarism or misinformation in an article submitted...if there is little budget? Is there any history that points to likelihood of any legal issues arising?
I look forward to learning more about what you are doing and what your students are doing. My husband, Dallas Smith, comes to India every year with "Mynta," Swedish Indian-Jazz fusion musical group. We have been to India many times and have Indian culture around us every day! Dallas studies with Ali Akbar Khan and continues to play the bansuri. We have much to talk about!
Our work in healthcare draws upon all of our musical experiences. I am a professional harpist for many decades!
About Science 2.0 and Open Access
Information exchange on Open Access topics in scientific publishing