Science topics: PhilosophyScience
Science topic
Science - Science topic
The study of natural phenomena by observation, measurement, and experimentation.
Questions related to Science
Hello ResearchGate community,
I hope this message finds you all well in 2025. I am Ionut Cristian Scurtu, with a strong background in Environmental Sciences, Engineering, Energy & Fuels, and Materials Science, currently based at the Mircea cel Batran Naval Academy and Constanta Maritime University.
With a portfolio of 27 publications indexed in Web of Science and an H-index of 4, my research primarily focuses on innovative solutions for sustainable development and technological advancements. I am eager to expand my network and collaborate with like-minded researchers who are committed to making a significant impact through scientific research.
I believe that through collaborative efforts, we can enhance our research profiles and contribute more effectively to our fields. Whether it's sharing resources, co-authoring articles, or developing new research proposals, there is tremendous potential in partnership.
I invite all interested researchers to connect with me here on ResearchGate or directly through my Web of Science profile (O-2089-2018). Let's discuss how we can work together to create research that not only advances our understanding but also provides practical solutions to global challenges.
Looking forward to your thoughts and hoping to collaborate soon!
Best regards, Ionut Cristian Scurtu
See my profile:
I have recently published a paper in the Skeptical Inquirer review (Volume 48, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2024): https://skepticalinquirer.org/2024/10/is-science-progressive-or-conservative/.
I would love to read your reactions!
Here is the introduction (you can read more if you click on the link above + the great audio version):
In our modern world, we consider science to naturally go hand in hand with progress.1 These two concepts are almost perceived as synonyms. Science is progress; I believe in science as I believe in progress. We then consider ourselves progressive, as supporters of progress, “moving forward” in the etymological sense of the word. Progress is often opposed to conservation, with the latter being seen as a symbol of inertia, i.e., resistance to change. In the eyes of the general public and progressive intellectuals, science—which is constantly advancing—cannot be conservative. By conservative, I mean preserving, safeguarding, and maintaining things, structures, and unchanging ideas. But is science only progressive?
Scientific ideas are often seen as revolutionary, wiping away the past, the tabula rasa. However, while ideas evolve, change, and modify, they still preserve certain older ideas that inspire the new ones. In this sense, we will see that science preserves more than it changes. But this is not opposed to progress. Actually, the foundation of science itself obeys a law of conservation, despite being in constant motion. As for scientists, Albert Einstein is the famous symbol of both scientific and political progress (Person of the Century 1999). We often hear that he revolutionized physics and our understanding of nature. However, the historical reality is more complex than we think. Einstein could be a staunch conservative in many aspects, while other scientists who are perceived as more conservative were more open to progress.
This article examines the contradictions and hesitations between progress and conservation inherent to science and the people who shape it through the illustrious example of Einstein. We will defend the thesis that sciences are built in the image of nature, i.e., preserving what needs to be preserved and constantly evolving to endure. At the end, we will support the idea of the existence of a complementarity rather than a dichotomy between progress and conservation in the construction of science.
Challenging established theories and providing solutions to long-standing problems in physics is no small feat. It has been proven now in the latest research that the second law of thermodynamics is wrong (Entropy is Constant) and that the Arrow of Time is T-symmetric. This could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. This actually changes physics as we know it for sure, as science will never be the same again after the findings that has already been published in an accredited peer reviewed international journal (see the paper below for details).
Do you guys agree to the findings? The proof is simple to read yet powerful enough to wrong the traditional laws of science. If not, please provide a reason why? We have had some very interesting discussions so far on other topics and I want to keep this channel open, clear and omni-directional!
Sandeep
Fighting misinformation in climate science requires a combination of education, communication, and strategic engagement. Here are some key approaches:
1. Strengthen Scientific Literacy
- Encourage critical thinking and scientific reasoning.
- Provide accessible, reliable sources of climate science (e.g., IPCC reports, NASA, NOAA).
- Promote understanding of how the scientific method works to help people distinguish between credible research and misleading claims.
2. Fact-Check and Debunk Myths
- Use fact-checking organizations like Climate Feedback or Skeptical Science.
- When debunking misinformation, use the “truth sandwich” method:State the correct information. Address the misinformation with context. Reinforce the correct information.
3. Improve Communication Strategies
- Avoid overly technical language; use simple and clear explanations.
- Focus on relatable impacts (e.g., extreme weather, health risks, economic effects).
- Use compelling visuals and storytelling to make data more engaging.
4. Engage on Social Media
- Correct false claims when you see them, but avoid confrontational debates.
- Share credible sources and support science communicators.
- Encourage media literacy—help people recognize misleading headlines and manipulated data.
5. Support Policy and Institutional Responses
- Advocate for better regulations on misinformation (e.g., holding media accountable).
- Support climate education in schools and public institutions.
- Engage policymakers with accurate scientific evidence.
6. Build Public Trust in Science
- Highlight consensus: Over 97% of climate scientists agree on human-caused climate change.
- Show real-world examples of climate action success stories.
- Address skepticism with patience and respect—many people distrust science due to political or ideological influences rather than facts.
How does generative AI technology help in scientific research, developing research projects, conducting scientific research, collecting research data, processing data collected from scientific research and developing the results of research work?
From many data, situations, examples, etc., it is clear that generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology significantly supports scientific research at every stage of its implementation, from concept design to the development of results. In the preparation phase of research projects, generative AI can help analyze scientific literature quickly and comprehensively. Natural language processing algorithms make it possible to search for relevant publications, identify key trends in the literature and pinpoint research gaps. This allows researchers to create more precise research questions and legitimate hypotheses, which is crucial to the quality and value of research. But does generative artificial intelligence technology help research mainly in terms of processing large data sets in a relatively short period of time, or is it also helpful in many other issues of ongoing scientific research? And how about the ethics and objectivity of conducting scientific research? Does generative artificial intelligence technology help with these issues as well?
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Please write what you think in this issue? Do you see rather threats or opportunities associated with the development of artificial intelligence technology?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Conniff, Richard (June 1982). "The name game". Crosscurrents. Science 82. 3 (5): 66–67.
New backgrounds of ruling elites
According to some, the world today is led by a different cast or group, based on their educational levels and academic backgrounds: economists, social scientists, academically mediocre politicians relative to past generations.
Skepticism about the success resume of the new elites
One has to see how the policies in favor of WHO (World Health Organization) and Green Economies and Zero Carbon in the last decades, policies that have the signature of these elites (social scientists, illiterate politicians , economists etc) have failed to yield.
There is no prejudice to these professions or academic areas, it's just a question of wheaher their training and philosophy is safe for taking all the basic decisions, which happens for the first time in the world, because the later influences invisibly the later.
The arguments
1. Among its refuters, among them many phsycisists and "hard science" minded people believe these policies illogical, and theoretically if you look at the real Physics and Chemistry they are all wrong.
2. Hard scientists are eager to realize first, due to their essence-based and realistic thinking which they are academically trained, is nothing but a false narrative to support financiers and profiteering without any real tangible effect, cause, or real product/economy generation and employment.
"That is what you get when these illiterate politicians and economists and social science mediocres take over a society", a hard science friend seems to claim.
The concept of what lies beyond the observable universe is a fascinating topic that combines science, philosophy, and speculations like: Unobservable Universe, Different Physical Laws, The Multiverse Hypothesis, Infinite Universe and so on.
The Impact of Open-Access Publishing on Academic Research
Open access (OA) publishing has revolutionized the landscape of academic research, making scholarly work more accessible to a global audience. This article explores the rise of open-access publishing, its benefits and challenges, and provides insights into the future of academic publishing in an open-access world.
Definition and History of Open Access Publishing
Definition: Open-access publishing refers to the practice of providing unrestricted online access to scholarly research. This means that anyone can read, download, and share the content without subscription fees or access barriers.
History: The concept of open access emerged in the early 2000s as a response to the rising costs of journal subscriptions and the limited accessibility of research. Key milestones include:
• Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002): This declaration called for the free availability of research literature on the public internet.
• Berlin Declaration on Open Access (2003): This statement further promoted the principles of open access and encouraged researchers to make their work freely available.
• Public Library of Science (PLOS): Founded in 2001, PLOS became one of the leading open-access publishers, demonstrating the viability of the OA model.
Benefits of Open Access for Researchers and the Public
1. Increased Accessibility: Open access removes paywalls, allowing researchers, students, and the public to access scholarly work without financial barriers. This democratizes knowledge and promotes educational equity.
2. Greater Visibility and Impact: Research published in open-access journals is more likely to be read and cited, increasing the visibility and impact of the work. This can lead to greater recognition and career advancement for researchers.
3. Faster Dissemination: Open access accelerates the dissemination of research findings, enabling timely access to new knowledge. This is particularly important in fast-moving fields like medicine and technology.
4. Collaboration and Innovation: By making research widely available, open access fosters collaboration across disciplines and institutions. This can lead to innovative solutions to complex global challenges.
5. Public Engagement: Open access allows the public to engage with scientific research, enhancing public understanding and appreciation of science. This can lead to more informed decision-making and policy development.
Challenges and Criticisms of Open Access
1. Funding and Sustainability: Open access publishing often relies on article processing charges (APCs) paid by authors or their institutions. This can be a financial burden, particularly for researchers from low-income countries or institutions with limited funding.
2. Quality Concerns: Some critics argue that the open access model may compromise the quality of peer review and editorial processes. Predatory journals, which charge fees without providing rigorous peer review, have emerged as a significant concern.
3. Intellectual Property: Open access can raise questions about intellectual property rights and the protection of authors' work. Ensuring proper attribution and preventing misuse of open-access content are ongoing challenges.
4. Equity Issues: While open access aims to democratize knowledge, the reliance on APCs can create inequities. Researchers from well-funded institutions may have an advantage over those with fewer resources.
The Future of Academic Publishing in an Open-Access World
1. Evolving Business Models: The future of open-access publishing will likely involve diverse business models, including institutional funding, consortia agreements, and transformative agreements that shift subscription costs to open-access fees.
2. Enhanced Quality Control: To address quality concerns, the academic community will need to develop robust mechanisms for peer review and editorial oversight. Initiatives like the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) help maintain standards by listing reputable open-access journals.
3. Global Collaboration: Open access will continue to promote global collaboration, enabling researchers from different regions to contribute to and benefit from shared knowledge. This can lead to more inclusive and diverse research outputs.
4. Technological Advancements: Advances in technology, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, may enhance the efficiency and transparency of the publishing process. These technologies can improve peer review, track citations, and ensure the integrity of research.
5. Policy Support: Governments and funding agencies are increasingly supporting open access mandates, requiring publicly funded research to be freely available. This policy support will drive the growth of open access and ensure its sustainability.
In conclusion, open-access publishing has had a profound impact on academic research, increasing accessibility, visibility, and collaboration. While challenges remain, the future of academic publishing in an open-access world looks promising, with evolving business models, enhanced quality control, and technological advancements paving the way for a more inclusive and equitable research landscape. By embracing open access, the academic community can ensure that knowledge is freely available to all, driving innovation and progress for the benefit of society.
#Research #Writing #WorkLifeBalance #AcademicLife #PhDLife #GradSchool #Thesis #Dissertation #AcademicWriting #Research #publishing #TimeManagement #openaccesspublishing #academicresearch #hamnicwriting #hamnicsolutions

Time reversal has long been regarded as an abstract concept, limited to theoretical models or microscopic quantum experiments. However, my recent groundbreaking research—DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27077.15845—proves that time symmetry is not only real but also extends to the macroscopic level, redefining our understanding of entropy, causality, and the very flow of time.
This research challenges the long-held belief in an ever-forward arrow of time by demonstrating mathematically that entropy can remain constant, enabling time reversal in larger systems. Such findings push us to ask:
- Can time reversal allow us to reshape the future, not just revisit the past?
- Could this principle be applied to real-world scenarios, such as regenerating ecosystems, reversing diseases, or preventing disasters before they occur?
- And perhaps most profoundly—can this breakthrough help us explore timeless and spaceless realms, such as the pre-Big Bang era, where conventional physics breaks down and God’s science may begin?
I invite the research community to share insights on:
- Applications of time reversal in both scientific and metaphysical contexts—how far can we push the boundaries?
- The implications of a constant entropy model—how does this challenge thermodynamics and our understanding of causality?
- The pre-Big Bang question—can we scientifically explore what existed when there was no time or space?
Let’s come together to advance this dialogue and uncover whether science beyond science can finally bridge the gap between physics, metaphysics, and divinity—unlocking answers to the mysteries that have puzzled humanity since the dawn of time.
Join the discussion—your insights can shape the future of time!
Read my original research article in this regards below, also available on my profile site!
I am investigating how advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, can influence ethical frameworks and societal structures. Specifically, I am interested in:
- Theoretical perspectives on the integration of technology into education.
- Case studies or examples illustrating the impact of technology on moral philosophy.
- How technological innovation reshapes the philosophy of science and knowledge systems.
Any insights, references, or relevant research would be greatly appreciated!
I believe Einstein provided one of the most intriguing designs for an experiment. Let me illustrate this with an example.
- First, imagine using a blindfold. To make it more scientific, instead of a blindfold, you must enter a laboratory with no windows. Now, unable to see the outside world, you are free to conduct experiments to determine whether you are accelerating in the universe or at rest on a planet.
- Through "thought experiments", Einstein concluded that no experiment conducted by a "blindfolded" scientist could resolve this dilemma.
- Even if you think of a few experiments that could help determine your status, there is always a way to render those experiments ineffective. For instance, Einstein suggested you could reduce the height of your laboratory to an extremely thin layer, making such experiments impossible.
And that’s it — with this design of experimentation, we can propose a new paradigm shift in science.
Kindly refer to the attached presentation for further details.
Presentation God: Valid Scientific Conclusion
Can it be proven that scientific results reflect the truth? If not, would science have any significance beyond professional reasons?
Is the valuation of cryptocurrencies determined by, among other things, political information posted on online social media?
Is one of the important factors influencing the valuation of cryptocurrencies the information posted on online social media from the world of politics?
In early December 2024, the price of Bitcoin exceeded the psychological level of $100,000. Besides, the value of the entire Bitcoin market exceeded the global valuation of silver reserves. In 2024, the price of Bitcoin has already risen more than 50 percent. However, investing in cryptocurrencies carries a high risk of incurring financial losses, because just as cryptocurrency valuations can rise quickly they can also fall even faster. Investment strategies vary, and in these strategies speculative investors rely on various types of information appearing in various media, including online social media. It happened more than once that large changes in the valuation of specific cryptocurrencies that took place in a relatively short period of time were influenced by entries, posts, short information posted on online social media by media-recognized individuals. In addition, it was sometimes difficult for Internet users to verify the question of reliability of these entries, posts, not always fully confirmed information.
I described the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in an article of my co-authorship:
APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATION
And what is your opinion about it?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Subtitle: Will all the fundamental researchers be fired from their jobs in the future and fundamental research become obsolete?
This is a philosophical but also practical question with immediate implications to our not so far future.
The danger is that AI applications in science like AlphaFold (Nobel prize in Chemistry 2024):
are not really predictions made by science by fully and fundamentally understanding nature's physics mechanics and chemistry but just brute force smart computational pattern recognition correlating known outcomes of similar input data and guessing the most likely new outcome. This is not new fundamental science and physics research but just an application of AI computation.
The philosophical question here is, will future scientists and human civilization using AI, continue to be motivated to do fundamental science research?
Is there really any real human urge to fundamentally understand a physical phenomenon or system in order to predict its outcome results for a specific input, if the outcome results can be easily and much faster and effortlessly being empirically and statistically guessed by an AI without the need of fundamental understanding?
This is a blind and mutilated future science and future danger of slowing down real new fundamental science breakthroughs and milestones. Therefore, essentially slowing down human civilization progress and evolution and demoting science to the role of a "magic oracle".
In my opinion, the use of AI in fundamental research like fundamental new physics research must be regulated or excluded. Already many science Journals have strict rules about the use of "Generative AI" inside the submitted papers and also completely not allowing it.
What are your opinions and thoughts?
What are the pressing research points in science teaching?
I am trying to measure serum neurofilament light chain in Multiple Sclerosis patients but I cannot find in the current student what is the required volume of the serum from each sample.
The history of science is part of the history of the freedom to observe, to reflect, to experiment, to record, and to bear witness. (Alan Gregg)
I am reaching out to solicit your expertise in challenging and scrutinizing a theory I have been developing over the years. The purpose of this request is to identify counterarguments, weaknesses, and additional variables that I might not have considered in order to deepen my investigation and understanding. While I have explored this topic extensively through introspection and personal analysis, I believe that the nuanced perspectives of others—particularly from the research community—are essential to refining or even debunking the theory. AI tools have proven insufficient in providing the depth of critique required, which is why I turn to you for human insights.
The central premise of my theory is that consciousness operates independently from the brain and body, and that emotions are subjective constructs rather than biological facts. Below is a brief explanation of this perspective:
- Consciousness as Independent from the Brain-Body System While the brain and body engage in complex, automatic communication, much of this interaction occurs beneath the threshold of conscious awareness. The body's physiological responses—such as changes in heart rate, muscle tension, or autonomic nervous system activity—often precede and operate independently of conscious recognition. These processes can be likened to a "language" that the conscious mind does not fully interpret or control. For example, during a stress response, the body initiates fight-or-flight mechanisms (e.g., increased heart rate, heightened senses) based on evolutionary instincts and biochemical processes. Consciousness may only interpret these changes after they occur, suggesting that it functions on a different plane than the brain-body.
- Emotions as Subjective Interpretations Emotions are not inherently tied to biological or cultural factors but are instead the result of individual conscious interpretation. Two people with identical biological makeups can experience the same event yet interpret it differently, leading to divergent emotional responses. This underscores the idea that emotions are subjective constructs created by consciousness. The brain-body system sends signals (e.g., physical sensations, postures, reactions) that the conscious mind interprets. These interpretations, rather than the biological signals themselves, constitute what we perceive as emotions.
To illustrate this theory, consider the relationship between Earth's internal processes and its surface:
3 .Earth’s Core = Brain-Body:
Earth’s internal core operates autonomously, sustaining life through processes like plate tectonics and magnetic fields. Similarly, the brain-body system sustains human life through involuntary functions like digestion, heartbeat, and stress responses.
4. Earth’s Surface = Conscious Mind:
The surface represents the conscious layer, where human activity, decisions, and behaviors take place.
Consciousness interacts with and interprets signals from the brain-body system but is not directly controlled by it.
5. Interdependence and Autonomy While the core and surface are separate, they are also interdependent. The core sustains the surface by providing stability, while the surface shapes external interactions. Similarly, the brain-body sustains consciousness by maintaining life, while consciousness influences external experiences and actions.
6. Autonomy of the Internal Core The Earth’s internal processes continue regardless of surface activity, just as the brain-body connection operates independently of consciousness (e.g., in unconscious states or comas).
7. Conscious Influence on Balance Conscious decisions, such as managing stress or practicing mindfulness, can enhance the brain-body connection, much like environmental restoration can improve Earth’s surface conditions. Conversely, harmful behaviors can disrupt this balance.
8.Consciousness and Biological Events Birth, puberty, bodily needs, and death occur at a biological level beyond full conscious control. While consciousness can influence thought and behavior, it remains distinct from the deeper, automatic functions of the body.
This theory—particularly the idea that consciousness operates independently of the brain and body and that emotions are subjective interpretations—is a work in progress. I recognize that it may contain oversights or conceptual gaps, which is why I am seeking counterarguments, alternative perspectives, and critiques to challenge its validity.
Specifically, I am interested in:
- Arguments or evidence that refute the independence of consciousness from the brain-body connection.
- Scientific or philosophical perspectives that demonstrate emotions as biologically or culturally inherent rather than subjective constructs.
- Additional variables or dimensions I should consider to refine or re-evaluate this theory.
This post provides only a brief overview, but I am happy to provide further details or clarifications upon request. Your insights and expertise would be invaluable in advancing this exploration, and I greatly appreciate any contributions to help strengthen or dismantle this framework.
What professions, professional professions performed by people are not threatened by the development of artificial intelligence technology?
Until relatively recently, the prevailing opinions were that among the professions, professional professions performed by people, which are not threatened by the development of artificial intelligence technology mainly included highly creative professions in which people demonstrated creativity. Recently, the prevailing opinions on the subject are changing, as the professions performed by humans now include those highly creative mental jobs and the least threatened are those that are mainly relatively simple physical jobs performed in the field. Yet the pace of technological advances being made within AI technology has been very rapid recently. Consequently, the currently dominant opinions in the issue of the impact of AI technologies on labor markets may also quickly become outdated.
I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Please write what you think in this issue? Do you see rather threats or opportunities for labor markets related to the development of artificial intelligence technologies?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

This is the papers of the Hafele-keating experiment
1. Around the World Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains – Hafele J. C., Keating R .E. – Science Vol. 177 (1972)
2. Around the World Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains – Hafele J. C., Keating RE. – Science Vol. 177 (1972)
First, there was the certain and clear evidence showing that the result in the two papers published in the Science is faked.
Dr. Kelly sentenced:[1]
The original 1971 test report, prepared by Hafele, has been obtained by this author(Dr. Kelly) direct from the United States Naval Observatory (USNO), [14].
The original test results were not published by Hafele & Keating, in their famous 1972 paper; they published figures that were radically different from the actual test results which are here published for the first time. An analysis of the real data shows that no credence can be given to the conclusions of Hafele & Keating.
Second, I think, I had clear evidence showing that, the theory for the Hafele-keating experiment is wrong.[2] According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the gravitational time effect of the Sun on the satellite of the GPS is much larger than that of the Earth. But, the effect of the Sun has not been considered in the Hafele-keating experiment.
Reference
[1] Kelly A. G., Hafele and Keating Tests: Did They Prove Anything? Physics Essays, 13, 616 (2000)
What needs to change for hydrogen energy to become widespread and become the basis of modern, zero-carbon energy? What system and technological changes are necessary in this regard?
According to the results of research conducted on this issue, it appears that the spread of hydrogen power as the basis of modern, emission-free energy requires both profound technological and systemic changes. One key aspect is the development of hydrogen production technology, particularly the green version of hydrogen, which is based on the use of renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, for the electrolysis of water. Currently, most of the world's hydrogen production comes from processes that emit significant amounts of carbon dioxide, such as steam reforming of natural gas. In order for hydrogen to be considered a truly carbon-free fuel, it is necessary to increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of electrolysis technology, as well as significantly increase the share of renewable energy in the energy mix.
I have described the key issues concerning the problems of the ongoing process of global warming, the negative effects of this process and, therefore, the need to scale up and accelerate the implementation of the green transformation of the economy in the following article:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY
And what is your opinion about it?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

I am working on a book about the role of artificial intelligence in geographical sciences. Who can help me with sources or theoretical and practical insights on this topic?
How important is it for a scientific article to have a high or low number of citations?
Does a high number of citations indicate the quality of the study?
Does a researcher's reputation increase if she/he is cited a lot?
The University of Malakand is thrilled to host the Mega Kick-Off Event for the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology 2025 (IYQST 2025). This event is organized in collaboration with the Pakistan Institute of Physics, Pakistan Chemical Society, and Quantum Initiatives Pakistan.
Event Highlights:
- Date: December 1, 2025
- Location: University of Malakand
Key Activities:
- Cake Cutting Ceremony: Marking the beginning of this transformative year.
- Quantum Walk for Science and Technology: Join us for an engaging and symbolic walk that highlights the importance of quantum science.
- Distinguished Lecture: "Quantum Technology: A Roadmap for Promoting and Establishing in Pakistan" by Prof. Dr. Fida Younas Khattak.
Throughout 2025, the University of Malakand, in partnership with these prestigious organizations, will offer a series of events, workshops, and seminars aimed at fostering innovation, collaboration, and the dissemination of knowledge in the field of quantum science and technology.
This mega event is spearheaded by Prof. Dr. Iftikhar Ahmad, a prominent figure in popularizing quantum science in Pakistan. His leadership and vision are pivotal in bringing this celebration to life.
Join us in celebrating the launch of IYQST 2025 and be part of a global movement toward a sustainable, technologically advanced future. Welcome to the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology 2025! 🎉🌟
What are the characteristics of the agentic artificial intelligence that is currently being rapidly developed and implemented into Internet applications?
What are the characteristics of agent-based artificial intelligence involving the rapid development of many different types of IT applications available on the Internet that function as AI agents?
Agent artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that is characterized by its ability to autonomously make decisions and act in a specific environment, usually in a way that adapts to changing conditions. It is a system that not only performs tasks within pre-programmed rules, but is also able to respond to external stimuli, make decisions based on collected information, and learn and adapt to new challenges. Of particular importance in the context of agent-based artificial intelligence is the ability to interact with the environment, process data independently and take actions to achieve specific goals or tasks, often without the need for direct human supervision.
I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Please write what you think in this issue? Do you see rather threats or opportunities for labor markets related to the development of artificial intelligence technologies?
And what is your opinion about it?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hello dear researchers. please guide me in find journal Q1 base science free for publish paper review. Thanks
What are the key sources of price increases for butter, cocoa, orange juice and other agricultural crops and food products in 2024 in many countries and globally?
Do the key sources of the aforementioned increase in the price of agricultural crops and food products in 2024 include the developing diseases attacking crops and farmed livestock, or are they the climate disasters, weather anomalies, environmental degradation resulting from an unsustainable, over-consuming economy and the accelerating process of global warming in many parts of the world?
In my view, the rise in crop and food prices in 2024 is the result of a complex combination of factors, including intensifying climate change, problems with plant and animal diseases, disruptions in global supply chains and rising demand. Addressing this problem requires sustainable actions, such as investment in climate-resilient agricultural technologies, improved international environmental cooperation, and long-term reforms in food security and stability of commodity markets.
I have described the key issues concerning the problems of the ongoing process of global warming, the negative effects of this process and, therefore, the need to scale up and accelerate the implementation of the green transformation of the economy in the following article:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Are you interested in scientific cooperation conducted within the framework of team-based implementation of research projects and writing scientific papers that include the results of team-based scientific research?
Dear researchers, scientists, friends of this Research Gate portal,
I believe that the development of good scientific cooperation is an important factor in the effective development of science and the solution of various problems, including the generation through new scientific discoveries of solutions to the key problems of the development of civilization. This Research Gate web portal equipped with the functions of a database of scientific texts, an indexing database of scientific journals and institutions, researchers and scientists, and also acting as an online social network greatly facilitates the establishment of contact between researchers and scientists operating in different scientific communities, different institutions, countries, continents. Thanks to this, there is an opportunity to remotely establish cooperation, build a working team, carry out team-conducted research work, team-publish the results of conducted scientific research, etc. Team-based research projects that are carried out by researchers and scientists representing different scientific institutions can also be interdisciplinary in nature, if the members of the research team represent different scientific disciplines. I am particularly interested in the problems of applications of new ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0/5.0, including Big Data Analytics and generative artificial intelligence in economics and management, including applications in sustainable economy, realization of green economy transformation, sustainable economic development, development of renewable and zero-carbon energy sources, protection of biodiversity and climate, construction of sustainable, green, zero-carbon circular economy. In addition to this, I have also conducted research and published academic papers on the issues of credit risk management, Internet banking, cyber-security, economic globalization, economic and financial crises, including the 2008 global financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic economic crisis, the 2022 energy crisis, anti-crisis economic policies, central banks' monetary policies conducted during economic and/or financial crises, etc. In addition, I am particularly interested in issues relating to the key problems of the development of civilization, developing formulas for solving them, analyzing the possibility of counteracting the development of various types of crises related to the development of civilization, including the developing climate crisis, environmental crisis, loss of biodiversity, and the impact of these processes on the economy and on the ability of future generations of people to exist on the planet in the future. Dear researchers and scientists, colleagues on this Research Gate portal, if you are conducting research in some aspect of the above-mentioned issues, on any topic related to any of the above-mentioned issues then I invite you to join me in scientific collaboration.
As inspiration for establishing potential scientific collaborations, including interdisciplinary research, I present below a selection of my scientific articles representing various issues in economics, management and other aspects of the social sciences:
Key aspects of the circular economy, including the green, sustainable economy are described in my article:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY
In the following article, I included the results of the research I conducted on the connection of the issue of sustainable development, the genesis and meaning of the Sustainable Development Goals, the essence of sustainable development in the context of social, normative, economic, environmental, climate, as well as human rights aspects, etc. The research also addressed the issue of key determinants of human existential security as an element of the concept of sustainable development.
HUMAN SECURITY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
I have described the key issues of the problematic sources of Poland's exceptionally deep energy cross in 2022 in my co-authored article below:
POLAND'S 2022 ENERGY CRISIS AS A RESULT OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE AND YEARS OF NEGLECT TO CARRY OUT A GREEN TRANSFORMATION OF THE ENERGY SECTOR
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
And the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management were described in my co-authored article:
APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATION
The key issues of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the economy and financial markets are described in my article below:
IMPACT OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC (COVID-19) ON FINANCIAL MARKETS AND THE ECONOMY
Analysis of the effects of post-2008 anti-crisis mild monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Bank and the European Central Bank
ACTIVATING INTERVENTIONIST MONETARY POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SECURITY OF THE EUROPEAN FINANCIAL SYSTEM
IMPROVING MANAGING THE CREDIT RISK IN CONDITIONS SLOWING ECONOMIC GROWTH
I invite you to get acquainted with the issues described in the publications listed above and to cooperate with me in scientific research on these issues.
I also invite you to familiarize yourself with my other scientific publications, which are available on my profile of this Research Gate portal.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Are you interested in scientific cooperation conducted in the framework of team research projects and writing scientific papers that include the results of team research?
And what is your opinion on this subject?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text, I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Is generative artificial intelligence creative or is it rather reproductive, i.e., it only processes certain complex processes on large data sets according to human-designed algorithms?
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that has recently generated much controversy over whether it can be considered creative or rather merely reproductive. On the one hand, generative AI, such as language models or image-generating systems, can produce unique, seemingly original content that at first glance appears to be the result of a creative process. Examples include generating poetry, music, images or even inventing solutions to complex scientific problems. On the other hand, however, it should be remembered that all these activities are strictly dependent on human-designed algorithms and the data on which these systems were trained.
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Please write what you think in this issue? Do you see rather threats or opportunities associated with the development of artificial intelligence technology?
What is your opinion on this issue?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
I would like to invite you to join me in scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Researchers,
As part of my PhD research at Université Cadi Ayyad, I am conducting a study on knowledge transfer among Moroccan researchers in the field of science and technology. The goal of this research is to better understand the dynamics of knowledge transfer and its impact on innovation in Morocco.
I would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous questionnaire, which will take only a few minutes of your time. Your insights will be invaluable in contributing to a deeper understanding of the role of knowledge transfer in fostering scientific and technological progress in Morocco.
Thank you very much for your time and collaboration. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdAHx63Dy2Zv2ysleVnkwzq-j8XwyzPwoVm0lBO2G_qKal6JA/viewform
How can advances in memory science reshapeassessments in medical curricula?
Chères/Chers chercheurs
Dans le cadre d'une thèse à l’Université Cadi Ayyad, on mène une enquête sur le transfert de connaissances chez les chercheurs marocains en sciences et technologies. Votre participation à ce questionnaire anonyme (quelques minutes seulement) serait précieuse. Merci pour votre précieux temps et votre collaboration.
In what applications are AI and Big Data technologies, including Big Data Analytics and/or Data Science, combined?
In my opinion, AI and Big Data technologies are being combined in a number of areas where analysis of large data sets combined with intelligent algorithms allows for better results and automation of processes. One of the key applications is personalization of services and products, especially in the e-commerce and marketing sectors. By analyzing behavioral data and consumer preferences, AI systems can create personalized product recommendations, dynamic advertisements or tailored pricing strategies. The process is based on the analysis of huge datasets, which allow precise prediction of consumer behavior.
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
I described the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in my co-authored article:
APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATION
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Can the responses of intelligent chatbots available on the Internet be “arbitrarily programmed in algorithms,” biased and predetermined by their creators, or are they rather a statistical resultant of the data on which they were trained?
The prevailing opinion on the subject is that the advanced language models currently under development, such as ChatGPT, Copilot and other intelligent chatbots, are based on artificial intelligence algorithms that learn by analyzing vast amounts of text and data. These algorithms are not “preloaded” with specific views or worldviews of their creators, but rather are trained on data that reflects the diversity of thoughts, ideas and perspectives present in society. In practice, this means that the views and values expressed by such models are the resultant of the data on which they were trained, rather than being directly derived from assumptions imposed by their creators. Thus, language models do not have a built-in “worldview,” but may reflect or reproduce dominant narratives, biases and patterns that are present in the datasets on which they were trained. But what is your opinion on this topic?
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Please write what you think in this issue? Do you see rather threats or opportunities associated with the development of artificial intelligence technology?
What is your opinion on this issue?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

"Faith in science" is a concept proposed by Durkheim, and followed by many others, including Merton. How does this kind of "faith" affect our lives?
𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐲 & 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬
Jörg Rüdiger Siewert
* 𝟎𝟖.𝟎𝟐.𝟏𝟗𝟒𝟎 - † 𝟎𝟗.𝟎𝟏.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒
𝐑. 𝐈. 𝐏. to my former Teacher and Chairman #Siewert
#surgery #chirurgie #science #wissenschaft

There are various journals available. Some agencies need Scopus, some need Web of Science and others. Which are more meaningful ? There is some confusion about 100s of agencies creating index. Please elaborate it.
Which online applications equipped with artificial intelligence technology do you think can be useful for researchers and scientists? Which applications utilizing generative AI technology can assist in conducting scientific research and/or analyzing and presenting the results obtained from such research?
Artificial intelligence technology has significantly enriched the range of tools available to researchers and scientists, supporting them in data analysis, writing publications, organizing work, and automating repetitive tasks. In the field of managing scientific literature, applications like Mendeley and Zotero enable document organization, automatic citation formatting, and recommendations for new publications. For data analysis and statistics, tools such as IBM SPSS Modeler and RapidMiner are particularly useful, as they employ machine learning algorithms to analyze large datasets, while Google Colab offers access to AI libraries and a Python environment for advanced data processing. In writing and editing scientific texts, applications like Grammarly and Writefull enhance linguistic quality and clarity, while ChatGPT supports the generation of summaries and research ideas. For data visualization, Tableau and Power BI are indispensable, as they integrate AI to automate trend analysis and suggest visualization formats, with BioRender aiding in the creation of aesthetically pleasing scientific diagrams. In natural language analysis, Leximancer and NVivo facilitate qualitative research by automatically identifying key themes and patterns in textual data. Teamwork organization is made easier with tools like Notion and Slack, which leverage AI features to manage projects and improve communication. For exploring scientific literature, applications such as Semantic Scholar and Connected Papers allow users to uncover relationships between articles and recommend key publications. These tools significantly streamline research processes, save time, and open new opportunities in science, adapting to the specific nature of the research being conducted and the needs of research teams.
In view of the above, I address the following question to you:
Which online applications equipped with artificial intelligence technology do you think can be useful for researchers and scientists? Which applications utilizing generative AI technology can assist in conducting scientific research and/or analyzing and presenting the results obtained from such research?
Please feel free to respond.
I invite you to join the discussion and scientific cooperation.
Thank you very much.
I described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
I invite you to familiarize yourself with the issues described in the article given above and to cooperate scientifically on these issues.
Kind regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Interdisciplinarity is highly valued in contemporary science. It encompasses the principles of academic diversity, ideological versatility, and collaborative efforts, turning individual findings into collective output. I would like to discuss: What are the characteristics of interdisciplinary research?
In the last two days, headlines have been buzzing about Google's unveiling of a "mind-boggling" quantum computing chip—a supposed leap into the future of technology. 🌌 But here's the hard truth: this entire field might be built on a fundamentally flawed foundation.
🔍 My research (DOI: 10.9790/4861-1505012633) reveals that the Schrödinger Equation, the cornerstone of quantum mechanics, is inherently unfit to describe the correct motion and state of quantum particles in their entirety. While it may work under controlled or specific conditions, it cannot define quantum particle mechanics universally. If the very basis of quantum mechanics is incorrect, how can quantum computing—which relies on these principles—ever succeed?
💡 Quantum computing is, by design, attempting to solve problems using flawed science. Billions of dollars, decades of research, and the world’s brightest minds are pouring resources into something that is fundamentally broken. This is science’s biggest illusion—a dream sold as progress but rooted in a misunderstanding of quantum mechanics' true limitations.
🌟 Instead of chasing illusions, it’s time to redirect our efforts and resources toward areas grounded in reality, such as improving classical computing or exploring new scientific paradigms that align with solid fundamentals. Let’s not let this “quantum rush” distract us from what truly matters.
🤔 This is the right time to pause, reflect, and choose a better path—one that doesn’t invest in an area that is doomed at its core but instead prioritizes technologies with true potential.
Let’s spark the debate: Is quantum computing science's biggest scam? Share your thoughts below! 👇
#QuantumComputing #QuantumMechanics #SchrödingerEquation #ScienceDebate #Innovation #FutureTech
Background Summary:
The relationship between science and spirituality has long been a subject of debate, often framed as a dichotomy—science grounded in empirical evidence and logical reasoning, and spirituality rooted in faith, intuition, and transcendence. Historically, the two have been seen as separate, with science focusing on the material world and spirituality addressing the metaphysical. However, recent advancements in various fields of science, particularly quantum physics, neuroscience, and cosmology, have begun to blur the lines between these traditionally distinct realms.
As science continues to uncover the mysteries of consciousness, the nature of reality, and the origins of the universe, new questions arise: Can spirituality, which encompasses the search for meaning and the experience of the divine, be reconciled with scientific inquiry? Can modern science, in its pursuit of understanding the fundamental laws of nature, leave room for concepts such as God, purpose, and interconnectedness?
Furthermore, many contemporary thinkers and scientists argue that spirituality could be incorporated into modern scientific frameworks. Practices like meditation, mindfulness, and consciousness studies have already demonstrated measurable impacts on human health and cognition. The exploration of how spiritual experiences can be understood and validated within scientific paradigms opens exciting opportunities for interdisciplinary research.
Science teachers often have lacunae in their knowledge base, as their only qualification is their degree, and parts of the high school curriculum may not have been covered sufficiently. When they, in turn, go to teach high school science, they may find themselves in the middle of the lesson and have just uttered the concept and realized they have made a mistake but continue regardless. I use the term 'fraudulent paradigm' to describe this scenario, but is there a better one (apart from just being negative about the teacher!)?
In this case, I mean it to refer to someone who has a tenet of their practice to not correct their own mistakes in science teaching.
By recognizing and valuing indigenous knowledge, modern science and knowledge systems can benefit from the diverse perspectives, innovative practices, and holistic approaches that indigenous communities offer. Collaboration and respectful engagement between indigenous knowledge holders and scientific communities can lead to more comprehensive and sustainable solutions for pressing global challenges. Hence, what is the contribution of indigenous knowledge top modern science or knowledge?
Background Summary:
In the pursuit of human progress, science has undeniably transformed the material aspects of life—advancing our health, wealth, and technology. Yet, there remains an uncharted territory: how can science be leveraged not just for physical abundance but to elevate the very essence of human existence, fostering prosperity, happiness, health, and even spiritual fulfillment? Can we scientifically engineer a model of living where every individual experiences bliss, vitality, and peace, while also nurturing the collective well-being of society?
The concept of "blissful living" is deeply rooted in ancient wisdom, yet modern scientific advancements in neuroscience, quantum physics, psychology, and social behavior offer unprecedented opportunities to explore this ideal. How do the principles of neuroscience—shaping our understanding of the brain and emotions—align with quantum physics' potential to transcend the limitations of material reality? How can social sciences bridge the gap between individual flourishing and collective harmony?
This vision calls for an integrative approach that combines the best of both the material and spiritual dimensions, enabling us to understand and cultivate abundance, health, wealth, and happiness not as separate pursuits, but as interconnected aspects of a higher state of existence. A holistic, scientifically grounded pathway to blissful living could revolutionise how we approach human well-being on a global scale, offering a framework for not just surviving, but thriving in a way that fosters a deeper connection to self, others, and the divine.
Some women tell me that men are attracted to a woman who can cook. Others tell me that if science allowed men to have babies, they would want to have them as much as women do. Some women think men suffer post-natal depression when they don’t bond with the baby. They don’t realise how worried men can be about the threat to their sex life. Many women don’t understand that men are often looking for sex rather than a relationship. In fact, they don’t seem to appreciate that men want sex at all!
We tried to combine Scopus data (BibTeX) and Web of Science data (plain text) in R Studio to run bibliometric analysis and visualize the results in VOSviewer, but we didn't achieve 100% accuracy, particularly in co-citation and coupling. Please suggest an alternative approach.
Is there a specific science called sports training among the sciences?
What are the scientific foundations, theories and rules?
Its origin, history and development?
What are the basic topics and divisions of sports training science?
Areas of sports training?
Any other information that proves the existence of sports training among the sciences?
Background Summary:
Poverty, disease, and hunger remain among the most persistent and devastating challenges facing humanity. Despite significant advancements in science, technology, and medicine, these issues continue to affect billions worldwide, hindering progress and well-being for millions. What if science could be harnessed not just to mitigate these issues but to eradicate them entirely?
Recent breakthroughs in various fields—such as biotechnology, renewable energy, artificial intelligence, and social sciences—offer unprecedented opportunities to tackle the root causes of poverty, hunger, and disease in innovative ways. Can we leverage these advancements to design systems of resource distribution, healthcare, and education that are sustainable and equitable for all? Can biotechnology revolutionize food production and health solutions, while AI and data analytics create efficient, scalable models for poverty reduction?
How do you think artificial intelligence can affect medicine in real world. There are many science-fiction dreams in this regard!
but how about real-life in the next 2-3 decades!?
Balancing teaching, research and personal or family commitments can be a huge task. No surprise that many academics choose not to turn their research into a startup business, even though the economic and social benefits can be considerable. Science research, in particular, has never been so important for solving important global problems such as renewable energy, food and water sufficiency, waste reduction and emissions reduction.
How can we collaboratively launch more science based startup ventures?
I am a second year student of science of learning and assessment. My research interest lies in Learning Assessment and Education Technology. I am looking forward to get deeper knowlegde on of AI-Assisted tools in education can be assess to improve learning outcomes and student success.
How could physics be integrated in forestry science?
My research is concern with Foriegn language learning and content learning at a time.
Generative AI (GenAI) is a branch of artificial intelligence that uses models to create new data such as text, images, or videos based on patterns learned from training data. It generates outputs in response to prompts by understanding the underlying structures of the input data.
Let's discuss the potential applications and benefits of Generative AI in biotechnology and explore how it can address current challenges in the field.
Hello, fellow researchers. Please help our scholar community by listing all the predatory journals and conferences you encountered. Identifying these predators