Saints - Science topic

If you’ve recently changed jobs and can’t update your primary affiliation on your ResearchGate profile, here are some helpful steps to try:

First, double-check that you’re logged into the correct account and that your new institution’s email address is added and verified in your profile settings. Sometimes ResearchGate requires email verification from the new affiliation to enable changes.

If that doesn’t work, try removing the old affiliation completely before adding the new one as your primary. ResearchGate’s system can be particular about multiple affiliations, and removing outdated ones can clear the path for updates.

Keep in mind that ResearchGate’s interface and policies might limit immediate changes, especially if your previous affiliation was linked to published work or projects. In such cases, contact ResearchGate support directly through their help center and explain your situation. They can assist with manual updates or clarify any restrictions.

While waiting, consider updating your profile summary or other sections to reflect your new role and institution clearly. This helps maintain your professional presence even if the primary affiliation update is delayed.

If you want, I can also help draft a clear message to ResearchGate support or suggest alternative platforms to showcase your updated profile.

Remember, just like adapting instructional strategies to fit learners' unique contexts as seen in evolving education methods or culturally specific practices like the Japanese classroom’s use of silence managing professional profiles requires patience and tailored approaches. Keep your profile active and reflective of your current work to stay motivated and connected in your research community.

Thank you. The error occurs with all her publications. Her affiliation is all right in every publication.

The research article and citation consolidation process at Saint Augustine University ensures that your academic work is well-organized, archived, and accessible for future reference. By collecting, scanning, and organizing your resources using citation management software, you can build a comprehensive research portfolio that showcases your accomplishments. This portfolio can be a valuable resource for academic or professional interests, showcasing your knowledge while making your work easy to reference and share. Taking these steps strengthens your academic legacy and sets you up for future success.

If you are considering becoming a Latter-day Saint, it's important to understand that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a range of members, from very conservative to more progressive individuals. Progressive Mormons often advocate for social justice, inclusivity, gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and reinterpretations of traditional doctrines or practices. They tend to focus on the spiritual and community aspects of the faith while challenging some of the more conservative interpretations or practices.

If you're exploring joining the LDS Church, your experiences might vary significantly depending on the local congregation, the community around you, and your personal beliefs. Engaging with both traditional and progressive aspects of the faith may help you find your place within this broad religious tradition.

I need what the Fathers of the Church had written about the fourth Gospel's author. Polycarpos, Papias, Iraneous...

Prolifertion of cyrodynamics

The dipole interactions which are responsible for the dielectric constant are of the order of a milli electron-volt, a priori they will not influence the energy levels of the molecular orbitals of the order of an electron-volt.

Hello,

Follow these papers.

Thanks,

It is a controversial matter , but it is definite that Convalescent Plasma will help the patient to reduce the viral load at any stage of disease .

The KAGRA community is unable to respond.

Dear Giovanni, the faculty of being physically present at the same time in two or more places is called ubiquity from the Latin ubique. It is not a miracle but a gift from God.

You cannot say overlooking. Nature and Science, being two much sought after journals, receive numerous manuscripts. They have a rigorous scrutiny mechanism to select quality papers. These journal establishments y employ full time editors to look into these aspects. Papers published in these journals are noticed and critiqued all over the world and any flaw in the papers published in these journals are taken seriously. If the articles from India have originality and some breakthroughs I am sue they will not reject them simply because they are from India!

Stanley Wilkin I'm curious about your medicalisation of psychology. Why does phenomenology have to be a medical discipline or entity?

And we certainly are in agreement about the continuum along which 'harmful' characteristics lie, though I think to label them 'harmful' is a judgement call that isn't helpful. We probably diverge because I have no beliefs, honest or otherwise. I'm just a scientist, and regard phenomenology as a science that is finally being recognised as vital to our understanding of mental health.

I agree with Jeevan, delete one of them. I recommend you to delete the first one because Vladimir Ivanov is very popular Russian name and many researchers may have the same name. You may also edit your profile and add a middle name.

Dear

Every language is evolving, our languages are quite difficult, and over the years there is simplification. For example, from the Bulgarian language the writing of ь at the end of some words disappeared.

In the 9th century it was important to educate the people in accessible language and the Bulgarian rulers found a way to achieve it.

And the following reasoning is coming into political circles.

Our life itself is a problem & as being said that we are social animal & as such we all have to be surrounded under the social environment consisting of various members with their outlook & also with their contributory life & as such we cannot avoid problems but we have to surmount our problem without disturbing our own life without any tension ,worries & frustration .

We know we have responsibility of our family besides in our career contribution also we have to face challenge it is in this line problem are unavoidable but we have to accept the challenge & solve the same .

However the certain problem are of ,disturbing nature our mind gets worry but with a firm faith within us & with our confidence of our self under the faith in our divinity within us we can certainly solve the solution of problem of every nature .

This is my personal opinion

JC y Richar, vengan a Panama, a secuenciar ..!! JC, cuando nos visitas?

Thanks Neils, I will!

I am not sure what exactly you mean when you say “coral associated” fish species. While St. Martin’s Island is clearly not a coral reef island it is surrounded by a diverse coral community that supports a diverse “coral reef fish” community that contains the three key “reef” taxa associated with all coral reef habitats, namely the chaetodontids (i.e., Chaetodontidae and Pomacanthidae), the labroids (i.e., Scaridae, Labridae and Pomacentridae) and the acanthurids (i.e., Acanthuridae and Siganidae). The one acanthurid family that I did not find on St. Martins Island was Zanclidae, but since 1997 there may have been more studies done and you may have them in your species list. These tree groups of fishes have an obligate association with “coral reef biota” and thus by extension also corals. Of these 3 groups the most closely associated with corals are the butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) with majority of them being corallivorous to various degrees ranging from obligate coral feeders to facultative feeders. .About 50% of chaetodontid fishes feed or corals themselves thus they are coral associated. In our 1997 study we observed only 5 species of butterflyfish. Incidentally, in the 1997 report in Table 14 the name of Chaetodon collare was misspelled. Nonetheless, all 5 species are well-known corallivores, and thus are exclusively associate with corals, they are obligate coral feeders. I am not sure what other species you have in your new list but it would be interesting to publish it. You can find the 1997 report through this link: If you are interested to get more information on reef fish I recommend a copy of the following textbook that you will find very informative (there is a new edition out there as well): Sale, P.F. (Ed.) 1991. The Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs. Academic Press, INC. San Diego 754 pp. I have also attached a review paper by Coles et al 2008 on butterflyfish that you should find helpful. I hope this help

Thank you Ronald Fricke and and Subal Kumar Paul for your reply identifying the species. It was a great help.

Judging from the colour pattern of the head, body and caudal fin and the bent preopercular spine, this might be Callionymus erythraeus (family CALLIONYMIDAE). That species has been previously recorded from the southern Red Sea and the northern Indian Ocean. For confirmation of this initial identification, it would be important to see details of the preopercular spine and the first dorsal fin.

While I agree with you of course, Peter, that idealism has killed billions, certainly when attached to religion or religious behaviour, and Marx cannot therefore be excused, also he did not intend what happened under the Bolsheviks, who made a particularly violent approach to Marx's ideas. There's something of the early Islam in Bolshevism, that its ideas can be forced onto others. Here I'm talking about the early conquest tropes, where the message and morals were so absolute that day to day morality was bypassed. Bolshevism was not the only approach, just the worst.

Marx's writings in general indicate a highly moral personality, shocked by poverty, injustice and suffering (to an extent) of others.

To be very productive and not wasteful so that I can continually offer brilliant solutions to distressing problems of mankind and more importantly offer great help to the weak, speechless and needy in the society

If the soul leaves the body during REM sleep, it is because the brain has remove gravity from its permanent sensations.

This is an old belief, but only if we take into account the loss of sensations during REM can it be explained.

Thank you for your maximally fair question.

c-global is an anachronism -- a return to the pre-1911 gravitational view of Einstein.

This long outdated view happens to have been correct.

Two reasons for that:

FIRST, Einstein did not have quantum mechanics as of yet (it lay 20 years in the future). The latter theory implies that all masses downstairs are reduced by the gravitational redshift factor. (Ask any specialist: no one seems to know this fact, right?) Reason: All locally generated photons have less energy. Hence the atoms created out of them by quantum creation-annihilation are proportionally reduced in their mass.

Hence all atoms downstairs are linearly blown up by the gravitational redshift factor relative to above, via the Bohr radius formula of quantum mechanics.

SECOND, the equivalence principle of Einstein of 1907 says that (and explains why) the just seen size increased is optically masked relative to above. To see this requires looking very carefully down once more. Then the bottom, even though horizontal everywhere locally speaking, is everywhere locally slanted relative to the tip. For a horizontally progressing light front downstairs is doing so on a locally slanted course, relative to the tip. This is a corollary to Einstein's derivation of the gravitational redshift factor itself (by a constantly applying recession of the bottom relative to the tip).

This fact now implies the local slanting as a corollary to Einstein's local receding. It is new. It explains Einstein's own correctly seen fact that light is necessarily "creping" downstairs when watched from the tip.

Thus, the Einstein-creeping is caused by a slant of the horizontally propagating light front (ray) downstairs at every point, relative to the tip. Hence c is actually NOT reduced downstairs, as Einstein had reluctantly seen himself being forced to conclude -- in violation of the axiom assumed at the outset that the rocketship is entirely described by the laws of special relativity with its

by definition global c.

The just-mentioned non-sequitur, by the way, explains the so far unexplained historical fact that Einstein could not (at any rate did not) touch on the topic of gravitation for 3 1/2 years until mid 1911.

But in the absence of the mentioned fact from quantum mechanics, the ice on which Einstein was walking was too thin to allow him to add the above "relative slantedness argument" to his already large enough list of absolutely revolutionary ("absurd" according to the knowledge of the time as well as common sense) arguments.

Did I answer your question to some extent? Do I have to say more about the ramifications?

Thank you once more for your unprecedentedly fair question.