Research - Science topic

I'm curious to know what you think about this? This kind of solution based on an intelligent publication search system and an intelligent content analysis system of retrieved publications on an online scientific portal could be of great help to researchers and scientists. In my opinion, the creation of a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built solely on the basis of online scientific knowledge bases, online scientific portals and online scientific publication indexing databases makes sense if basic issues of copyright respect are met and such tools use continuously updated and objectively and scientifically verified knowledge, data and information resources. With such a solution, researchers and scientists conducting research on a specific topic would have the opportunity to review the literature within the millions of scientific publications collected on specific online scientific portals and scientific publication indexing databases. Besides, what is particularly important, the mentioned partially automated literature review would probably be realized in a relatively short time. Thus, an intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications would, in a short period of time, from among the millions of texts archived in specific scientific publication indexing databases, select those publications in which other researchers and scientists have described analogous, similar, related, correlated, related, etc. issues, results of scientific research conducted, selected publications within the same scientific discipline, the same topic or in the interdisciplinary field. Besides, an intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications could also categorize the retrieved publications into those in which other researchers and scientists confirmed analogous conclusions of conducted similar research, polemicized with the results of other researchers' research on a specific topic, obtained other results from conducted research, suggested other practical applications of obtained research results realized on the same or similar topic, etc. However, for ethical reasons and properly conducted research, i.e., respecting the research results of other researchers and scientists, it would be unacceptable for this kind of intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of many publications available on specific databases for indexing scientific publications to enable plagiarism, i.e., to provide research results, provide retrieved content on specific issues and topics, etc., without accurately providing the source of the data, description of the source data, names of the authors of the publications, etc., and some unreliable researchers would take advantage of this opportunity. This kind of intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications should give for all searched publications full bibliographic descriptions, source descriptions, footnotes containing all the data that are necessary to develop full source footnotes for possible citation of specific studies, research results, theses, data, etc. contained in other publications written by other researchers and scientists. So, building this kind of intelligent tool would make sense if ChatGPT-type tools were properly improved and the system of laws for their use appropriately supplemented so that the use of ChatGPT-type tools does not violate copyrights and that these tools are used in accordance with ethics and do not generate misinformation. Improving these tools so that they do not generate disinformation, do not create "fictitious facts" in the form of descriptions, essays, photos, videos, etc. containing nicely described, presented never and nowhere seemingly facts is to keep Big Data systems updated, update data sets and information, based on which they create answers to questions, create descriptions, photos, companies and so on. This is important because current online tools like ChatGPT often create "nicely described fictitious facts," which is used to generate fake news and misinformation in online social media. When all that I have written above would be corrected and the use completed, and not only in some parts of the world but on a global scale, then the creation of a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built solely on the basis of online scientific knowledge bases, online scientific portals and online indexing databases of scientific publications would make sense and could prove helpful to people, including researchers and scientists. Besides, the current online ChatGPT-type tools are not perfect, as they draw data not directly in real-time online from specific databases and knowledge contained in selected websites and portals, but draw information, knowledge, data from an offline database created some time ago. For example, currently the most popular ChatGPT still relies on a database of data, information, etc. contained in many publication texts downloaded from selected websites and web portals but not today or yesterday downloaded only in 2021! So these are data and information already outdated on many issues. Hence the absurdities, inconsistencies with the facts, creation of "fictitious facts" by ChatGPT in a significant part of the answers generated by this system to questions asked by Internet users. In view of the above, in a number of issues, both technological, organizational, formal, normative, etc., such intelligent systems should be improved so that they can be used in open access in the applications I wrote about above.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Are you an international researcher? I have started a new project with my dear colleague, Phelipe Magalhães Duarte and Sara Khosravipour , on the topic of CCHF. If you think you have high potential for this research, don't waste time and send your CV by email. Email: sina.salajegheh@gmail.com

if blood can't describe the solution to the problem, is science qualified to comment?

The research shows that the development of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications, including the technology of the ChatGPT intelligent language model made available on the Internet, is currently proceeding at a much faster pace in terms of adapting legal norms to the new situation of rapidly developing new applications of this technology. In addition, the developing new applications of the artificial intelligence solutions available to Internet users generate not only positive aspects. For example, there are already numerous situations of disinformation on social media using photos, texts and videos generated by certain artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet. In addition to this, the possibility of generating the texts of articles and essays using the ChatGPT language model available on the Internet, which does not show data sources, source publications or bibliography footnotes, generates a serious problem of violation of basic copyright issues. In addition, the ChatGPT-generated texts do not contain information indicating whether they are entirely the product of artificial intelligence creativity or whether they are, however, texts produced by 'assembling' them by combining paragraphs and assignments borrowed from other Internet-accessible publications, articles, book texts, etc., which were added to the database used by ChatGPT in 2021 after being downloaded from the Internet. This problem could also apply to the many other artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet capable of generating images, videos, innovations, patents, computer software, new drugs, technical designs, artistic works, etc. It is therefore also necessary to build a digital labelling system for the various "works" created by artificial intelligence in order to distinguish them from what is directly created by humans. In addition to this, the improvement of such creative artificial intelligence systems should also address the issue of the automatic display of data sources, reference publications, annotated bibliographies and the elimination of the possibility of plagiarism in this way. It is also necessary to adapt the legal norms in the field of copyright law and, for example, also tax law relating to the issue of taxation of work carried out by artificial intelligence replacing humans in certain positions in companies and enterprises. In addition, other issues that require adaptation of legal norms to the current situation of different applications of artificial intelligence are how to solve the issue of authorship and gratification for "works" created by a robot or other machine equipped with an artificial intelligence system, when an intelligent robot has been produced by one company and another company has purchased it, and it is within the latter company that the AI-equipped robot has created certain "works" such as photographs, films, innovations, patents, computer software, new medicines, technical designs, artistic works, etc., which have been created by the robot. In view of the above, it is obvious that the development of artificial intelligence should develop in such a way that it does not get out of hand. This means, for example, that ChatGPT technology should be improved and legal norms regarding copyright should be amended so that the continued development of various solutions, generations, etc. of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications is not a problem for the development of science, scientific research, describing and publishing research results, etc., but only supports the development of science.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Ongoing technological progress is increasing the technical possibilities of both conducting research, collecting and assembling large amounts of research data and their multi-criteria processing using ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0. Before the development of ICT information technologies, IT tools, personal computers, etc. in the second half of the 20th century as part of the 3rd technological revolution, computerised, semi-automated processing of large data sets was very difficult or impossible. As a result, the building of multi-criteria, multi-article, big data and information models of complex macro-process structures, simulation models, forecasting models was limited or practically impossible. However, the technological advances made in the current fourth technological revolution and the development of Industry 4.0 technology have changed a lot in this regard. The current fourth technological revolution is, among other things, a revolution in the improvement of multi-criteria, computerised analytical techniques based on large data sets. Industry 4.0 technologies, including Big Data Analytics technology, are used in multi-criteria processing, analysing large data sets. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be useful in terms of scaling up the automation of research processes and multi-faceted processing of big data obtained from research.

The technological advances taking place are contributing to the improvement of computerised analytical techniques conducted on increasingly large data sets. The application of the technologies of the fourth technological revolution, including ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0 in the process of conducting multi-criteria analyses and simulation and forecasting models conducted on large sets of information and data increases the efficiency of research and analytical processes. Increasingly, in research conducted within different scientific disciplines and different fields of knowledge, analytical processes are carried out, among others, using computerised analytical tools including Big Data Analytics in conjunction with other Industry 4.0 technologies.

When these analytical tools are augmented with Internet of Things technology, cloud computing and satellite-implemented sensing and monitoring techniques, opportunities arise for real-time, multi-criteria analytics of large areas, e.g. nature, climate and others, conducted using satellite technology. When machine learning technology, deep learning, artificial intelligence, multi-criteria simulation models, digital twins are added to these analytical and research techniques, opportunities arise for creating predictive simulations for multi-factor, complex macro processes realised in real time. Complex, multi-faceted macro processes, the study of which is facilitated by the application of new ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0, include, on the one hand, multi-factorial natural, climatic, ecological, etc. processes and those concerning changes in the state of the environment, environmental pollution, changes in the state of ecosystems, biodiversity, changes in the state of soils in agricultural fields, changes in the state of moisture in forested areas, environmental monitoring, deforestation of areas, etc. caused by civilisation factors. On the other hand, complex, multifaceted macroprocesses whose research processes are improved by the application of new technologies include economic, social, financial, etc. processes in the context of the functioning of entire economies, economic regions, continents or in global terms.

Year on year, due to technological advances in ICT, including the use of new generations of microprocessors characterised by ever-increasing computing power, the possibilities for increasingly efficient, multi-criteria processing of large collections of data and information are growing. Artificial intelligence can be particularly useful for the selective and precise retrieval of specific, defined types of information and data extracted from many selected types of websites and the real-time transfer and processing of this data in database systems organised in cloud computing on Big Data Analytics platforms, which would be accessed by a system managing a built and updated model of a specific macro-process using digital twin technology. In addition, the use of supercomputers, including quantum computers characterised by particularly large computational capacities for processing very large data sets, can significantly increase the scale of data and information processed within the framework of multi-criteria analyses of natural, climatic, geological, social, economic, etc. macroprocesses taking place and the creation of simulation models concerning them.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The progressive digitization of data and archived documents, digitization of data transfer processes, Internetization of communications, economic processes but also of research and analytical processes is becoming a typical feature of today's developing developed economies. Currently, another technological revolution is taking place, described as the fourth and in some aspects it is already the fifth technological revolution. Particularly rapidly developing and finding more and more applications are technologies categorized as Industry 4.0/5.0. These technologies, which support research and analytical processes carried out in various institutions and business entities, include Big Data Analytics and artificial intelligence. The computational capabilities of microprocessors, which are becoming more and more perfect and processing data faster and faster, are successively increasing. The processing of ever-larger sets of data and information is growing. Databases of data and information extracted from the Internet and processed in the course of conducting specific research and analysis processes are being created. In connection with this, the possibilities for the application of Big Data Analytics supported by artificial intelligence technology in terms of improving research techniques, in terms of increasing the efficiency of the research and analytical processes used so far, in terms of improving the scientific research being conducted, are also growing rapidly.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

On my profile of the Research Gate portal you can find several publications on Big Data issues. I invite you to scientific cooperation in this problematic area.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Norwood-Hamilton scale for male pattern hair loss was first published by Norwood OT, in Southern Medical Journal (1975).

Reproduced by Justine A. Ellis, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine by Cambridge University Press 2002.

Is the scale patented or free for use in clinical research?

Many clinics across the globe have been using it and also published it on their website/blogs.

Is it ResearchGate, LinkedIn, or something else?

The materials science dissertation did not conduct experimental studies. What is the name and how to search on the Internet for this type of dissertation, in which, for example, they simply applied some method or developed some approach, but did not directly experiment, for example, to change the structure, did not create any materials, substances and etc. among the sciences where it is usually required to do this (materials science, chemistry)? Give examples of such dissertations. Thank you!

Increasingly, future global climate catastrophe is being combined with global biodiversity catastrophe in scientific deliberations. Still high civilization's greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming to accelerate. If nothing changes in this regard, according to the predictions of climatologists, climate geophysicists, ecologists, researchers operating in interdisciplinary areas, etc., in a few decades planet Earth will face a global climate catastrophe, which will result, among other things, in a many times higher frequency and scale of emerging periods of severe drought, heat, forest fires, etc., which will result in the impossibility of human existence on most of the planet's land areas. This will be associated with lack of water, permanently breaking out fires, inability to grow crops, etc. In addition, in these areas, the level of biodiversity of natural ecosystems will decline many times over. To a large extent, most of the planet's biosphere will be affected. The scale of the ongoing mass extinction of many species of flora and fauna, the scale of the current great 6 species extinctions (6 within the history of life on Earth) will increase many times over. The biodiversity of the planet will decrease many times over, that is, what has evolved for hundreds of millions of years as part of the evolution of life on Earth, man will destroy in a relatively short period of a few centuries at most (counting from the period of the first industrial revolution). Therefore, the results of many scientific studies already support the thesis that a global climate catastrophe will also generate a global biodiversity catastrophe, and therefore the two catastrophes should be studied simultaneously as closely related. Do you agree with this thesis? Whether you agree or not then please provide substantive arguments, studies, publications.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite you all to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

If you were considering research in a developing import-dependent African country, what would be those contemporary areas of interest that hold both practical and theoretical contributions??? Your opinion is highly appreciated.

Hi All,

I’m often asked to suggest academic Design Journals, but find it hard to find a 'one-stop' list so researchers/ students can review and select. I’ve started a rough list in no particular order (link below). Any Design related journal suggestions would be welcome, from Innovation to engineering, education to ergonomics, UX to Design history, etc. Discipline-specific or Interdisciplinary.

Please offer some suggestions and Il add them to the list. Looking for quality, peer-reviewed offerings.

Thanks alot!

P.J.

I think yes, what do you think?

Decades ago, researchers had to conduct their research using more manual methods and efforts. They still produced good research.

Today, technology makes research easier, wider and faster through online methods of data collection and analysis. We can even break geographical research borders through technology. In addition we have referencing softwares and we can type out our research on various word processing softwares. There are many more advantages.

However, some may argue that we have become over-reliant on technology usage in research. Can this compromise our research precision and quality thereof. Are there any negative implications?

What are your thoughts?

I have been working in digital marketing for the past 6 years, but now, the world has changed. There have been many changes in digital marketing i.e. Chatbots, Chat GPT. Some of the most popular AI tools for digital marketers include Jasper, Surfer SEO, Zapier, Grammarly, and Hemingway Editor.

AI uses complex algorithms to analyze large amounts of data, identify patterns and make predictions based on what it has learned from the past.

What's the future of Digital Marketing?

.

What is the difference between a literary review and a regular report that is made for a speech, which is usually given at school? Give comparisons between the report and the literary review, where the text is more like an abstract, and where is it like a literary review? How to distinguish a report from a review? How should the text in the report and review look like? Thank you!

To consider the question of the role of so-called "carbon credits" in the context of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, one would have to assume that such a system actually reliably works. However, from what is reported by independent journalists, environmentalists, people who care about protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems, including the forests of the Amazon, even those declared patches of natural Amazon Rainforest taken for protection under the so-called carbon credits are nevertheless often cut down.

Perhaps something will finally begin to change, to improve, in terms of protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the natural ecosystems of the Amazon Rainforest in connection with the first Amazon Forest Conservation Summit in 14 years, currently being held in Belém, Brazil. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell by 60 percent in July compared to the same month last year. The announcement of the positive trend coincides with the start of a summit in Belém of the 8 countries whose territories include the Amazon forest. This summit is attended by representatives of the governments of the 8 countries whose territory includes the natural Amazon Forest. Perhaps plans and commitments will be made to realistically protect this largest terrestrial reservoir of natural biodiversity and natural forests characterized by a particularly high contribution to absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere and producing oxygen. It may also be that the processes of increasing the scale of protection of these forests and reducing their still large-scale logging will be accelerated so that by 2030 at the latest, the deforestation of these forests will be completely ended. This is a particularly important issue because more than 20 percent of the Amazon rainforest has already disappeared due to human activity.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I have conducted a multiphase mixed-methods research, through which i developed, implemented and evaluated an injury surveillance system that was tailored for stakeholders as a practical injury monitoring tool and through which i could obtain injury epidemiological data. However, I am not sure whether the following overarching research aim should be phrased in this way:

"The overarching aim of this thesis is to develop, implement, and evaluate a context-specific injury surveillance system tailored to the needs of the U/21 Maltese national football team stakeholders through which a comprehensive year-round study of injury epidemiology within the U/21 National football team could be conducted."

I'd really appreciate your views about this.

97 percent of the water on the planet is salt water in the oceans and seas. 3 percent of the water is fresh water, in you, 1/3 in glaciers and 2/3 is cloud water, surface water (rivers, lakes, marshes), hypodermic and deep water. So, man has at his disposal for his needs (including industrial, agricultural, domestic, municipal...) only 1 percent of the water on the planet.

The research shows that with the operation of a sustainable farm or agro-tourism farm practicing organic farming mainly oriented to the cultivation of vegetable crops can be associated, correlated can be the issue of water consumption savings, a large decrease in greenhouse gas emissions, an increase in the scale of energy autonomy, a decrease in the scale of non-biodegradable waste generation, increased financial savings due to less use of chemical plant protection products, etc. Besides, there may be water consumption savings associated with running a sustainable organic farm or agritourism farm, improved water management compared to an unsustainable production farm.

The study found that when a farm allocated 1/10th of the area of cultivated fields for afforestation, tree planting, planting shrubs, creating green areas, green belts separating individual fields, creating ditches with irrigation water for cultivated fields, creating rainwater storage ponds for irrigation of cultivated fields during periods of drought, and it turned out that despite the reduction in cultivated area, crop production increased. In addition, large amounts of water were saved. And if these reduced croplands were used to produce crops as not fodder for livestock but as food for humans then the benefits mentioned above would increase much more.

Producing 1 kg of beef as part of the entire process of farming and cattle breeding consumes as much as a dozen tons of water.

In traditional, productive, intensive agriculture, 4 times more farmland (livestock feed production) is used as part of meat production compared to the situation if the fields produced crops, i.e. grains, fruits and vegetables but used as raw materials to produce food products as food directly for humans.

Increasing the scale of water consumption savings on the farm regardless of the type of agricultural production can also be achieved by building small-scale on-farm water treatment plants, rainwater catchment systems and tanks, retention ponds where rainwater is stored. Rainwater should be used on the farm for, among other things, watering agricultural crops. However, the problem is the increasing incidence of prolonged lack of rainfall and severe periods of heat and drought derived from the progressive process of global warming. In such a situation, deep wells are built and deep water, including Oligocene water, is extracted. If this kind of water is used for agricultural purposes then deep-water resources can quickly run out. Therefore, especially when a farm uses deep-sea water it is essential to create and improve water-saving technologies and systems. In the situation where the farm is located near a river then the solution may be to create a river water treatment plant for agricultural use. And when the farm is next to the sea or ocean then investment in seawater desalination may be a good solution. However, this kind of investment is highly expensive. Then there should be created and developed systems of financial subsidies provided from the state's public finance system, which, under green financing, would help farmers and entrepreneurs operating also in other sectors of the economy to build systems for desalination and possibly also treatment and purification of seawater, which could be used for various purposes, including multi-faceted use on farms.

In a situation where a farm would obtain water from the seas and oceans instead of consuming deep-sea water resources, which will not recover quickly, this would be an important element of natural sustainability. Deep-sea water, including Oligocene water, has been forming for thousands or millions of years. On the other hand, in its extraction and consumption for industrially carried out projects carried out under a predatory economy, the resources of this water can quickly be depleted, and this is an important element of an unsustainable economy. Therefore, within the framework of a sustainable agricultural or agritourism farm carrying out organic farming in a situation of water shortages, increasingly frequent periods of drought, then in order for the farm not to lose its sustainable status it should use rainwater, water from treated wastewater and/or desalinated sea water instead of using deep-sea water resources.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What do you think about this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hi everyone. I need your help. Recently, I tried to apply for and pursuing to look for a Ph.D. position in education. But has been 1 year I haven't yet got a supervisor. If you are here, is the supervisor in education and looking for Ph.D., I'm willing to get the chance and adapt to discuss the required Ph.D. at each university, including research proposal and other things.

Looking forward to getting my best supervisor to work together. Thank you

In the current fast-changing reality, the era of the fourth or fifth technological revolution, the rapid emergence of new research concepts, new technologies, new proposals for solving certain problems, the search for ideas for new startups, the development of new socio-economic trends, new fashion trends for certain solutions, new ideas, etc., it is not easy to come up with, create, formulate an interesting, up-to-date, forward-looking, unconventional, novel, creative, innovative thesis topic. Therefore, it is important for lecturers and thesis supervisors to use certain incentives, motivators to select or independently formulate an interesting, current, future-oriented, unconventional, innovative, creative, innovative topic for the thesis, bachelor's thesis, master's thesis and/or doctoral thesis.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

As we know, trees, forests, especially old, natural forests, primeval forests with old-growth forests without human interference, without the influence of civilization, are the refuge of the greatest resources of biodiversity of natural ecosystems. Besides, forests play a particularly important role in the issue of slowing down the human-induced global warming process, which is progressing faster and faster. Forests also play a very important role in mitigating weather and climate anomalies, maintaining a mild microclimate friendly to living organisms, keeping the soil and air moist, maintaining the high level of biodiversity and soil fertility created over thousands or millions of years, and so on.

Deforestation still dominates over afforestation in many regions of the world. Forests are still being cut down and burned to acquire new areas for agricultural development, the cultivation of crops, which is usually carried out in the form of unsustainable robbery. In addition, this practice is carried out mainly in the tropics and subtropics, where after logging, forests created new arable land is quickly subject to drought and the soil becomes barren. Restoring a forest that has functioned for thousands of years or more in a specific area on the depleted soil requires huge expenditures. In addition, vegetable crops are grown on these new agricultural areas, which are either transported thousands of kilometers to other countries, which generates high greenhouse gas emissions, or are not used for human food but for livestock feed, which also generates high emissions, as industrial livestock farming is a source of high emissions of the potent greenhouse gas methane. Therefore, with a view to protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and counteract the ongoing process of global warming.

Various examples of reducing paper consumption and saving forests are as follows:

In some countries, the scale of printing notebooks, notebooks, books, including school books, has been reduced and students as early as elementary school write at school on tablets or laptops rather than in paper notebooks. Green economic activities involving, for example, the production of furniture from recycled materials are also emerging.

Another example is the replacement of dirty energy based on burning firewood with renewable and emission-free sources of clean energy. Unfortunately, in some countries, in order to falsify statistics on the development of renewable energy at the behest of the government, central statistical institutions, ministries and government agencies dealing with climate and environmental issues also count firewood as a renewable energy source. Such absurdities unfortunately still exist in some countries.

Another example is the use of secondary raw materials of various origins in the construction industry instead of using wood, and especially instead of newly harvested wood from companies producing building materials based on fresh, new wood raw material from a sawmill.

As of 1.8.2023, paper receipts are not printed in France to save trees. You have to ask for a printed receipt if the customer needs one.

What other examples of reducing paper consumption and saving forests are as follows?

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please respond,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Recently, I have written a research article. I want to produce preprint of it. I found various platforms for creating preprints of articles, including arXiv and Researchsquare. Personally, which platform do you prefer?

What is the difference between a literary review and an abstract? Can you give examples of comparing an abstract and a literature review? Thank you!

Can I publish my design in my research article at the time of design patent submitted to IPR?

Two weeks before I submitted my design to IPR for patent purposes, I would like to upload the research article to the journal. In that journal, I used that particular design.

Is it okay to upload that article, or is there any other alternative way?

In my opinion, it makes sense to create a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built exclusively on the basis of continuously updated data, information, objectively verified knowledge resources, and which will use exclusively those Internet databases, knowledge bases, portals and websites that individual Internet users themselves will select, define, define. This kind of solution, which would allow personalization of the functionality of such generative artificial intelligence systems, would significantly increase its functionality for individual users, Internet users, citizens. In addition, the scale of innovative solutions for practical applications of such personalized intelligent systems for analyzing content and data contained in selected specific Internet resources would increase significantly.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Seeking insights into the forefront of agricultural extension research, this question aims to explore the novel methodologies that have recently emerged in the field.

Scientific cooperation can develop on the scale of specific scientific and research institutions, scientific and teaching institutions, research and development centers, research and implementation laboratories, educational institutions, research centers and laboratories of companies and enterprises, government agencies dealing with science and scientific research, local government institutions and non-governmental organizations whose activities are based on the results of scientific research, and so on. Scientific cooperation can develop on a national and/or international scale. Scientific cooperation can develop in one or more scientific disciplines, i.e., interdisciplinary. Scientific cooperation may develop, among other things, in terms of conducting exchanges of experience in scientific research, joint team research, joint team publication of scientific research results, etc. Online indexing databases of scientific institutions, indexing of scientific publications, indexing of scientific persons, researchers and scientists, etc. can be helpful in establishing scientific cooperation. Besides, Internet portals that enable remote through the Internet to exchange scientific experiences, discuss scientific topics, etc. can also be helpful in developing scientific cooperation. An example of this kind of scientific portal is this Research Gate portal, where we can hold discussions on scientific topics, ask questions and answer questions in the discussion forum. In this way, new scientific cooperation can also be initiated, which I hereby encourage.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

While it is common practice in the health field to use validated descriptors available in thesauri or glossaries, in other fields it is apparent that researchers use the terms they feel are most appropriate. By ignoring accepted terminology, their work may fall off the radar of database searches. An example of this is the choice of keywords that are not associated with validated descriptors. As a direct consequence, literature reviews in some areas, particularly in the social sciences, may produce results with increasing levels of error. I believe that this issue should be the subject of further reflection and debate.

There are various types of warfare such as military warfare, political warfare, business warfare, marketing warfare and even information warfare etc... However, do you think there is/will be such a thing as 'Research Warfare'. If so, how would you describe it?

Your thoughts and opinions are welcome. There is no right or wrong answer.

Just in case, here is a description of Researchgate's Research Spotlights feature

Just as centuries ago, the change from a geocentric to a heliocentric system of planetary and solar bodies in the system now known as the solar system was fundamental to the understanding of the role of man in the Universe, etc.? Yes in the future, when it is scientifically confirmed that in the Universe there are thousands of other exoplanets similar to our planet Earth, many millions of light years distant, on which there are other forms of life, including intelligent life forms this will also probably prove to be a breakthrough in the understanding of the essence of humanity and the role, importance of man in the Universe, the purposefulness of his existence, the possible purposefulness of the process of evolution of life, etc.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this subject?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The Ricci tensor assumes the role of helping us understand curvature. Within my Universal Theory research, the Ricci tensor unveils itself. I was pleased to find as detailed in my research document on the Grand Unified Theory Framework (of which advancements in technology are showing there may be more than one viable form of as science progresses)that the Ricci Tensor was typically vanishing to zero in relation to the schwarzschild metric as it should back when I was performing feasibility and speciousness checks via calculations with other experts and myself. But in practical applications of the Grand Unified Theory Framework, vanishing to zero unravels very intriguing consequences.

One of said consequences was something small and interesting I wanted to discuss. The purpose is to highlight the intricacies of implementing such a highly comprehensive concepts in practical settings such as code. To thus detail the challenges researchers may face when translating comprehensive physics and mathematics formulations into concrete applications. More often than not I have found it requiring innovative adaptations and problem-solving. I also want to hear if anyone has any experience with similar things and what their experience was.

My recent amd past ventures into authenticating the Universal Theory framework in code but also writing complex neural networking and AI code with it, as well as Quantum computing code had a lot of interesting hurdles. I immersed myself in the depths of this then encountered a peculiar happenstance. The vanishing of the Ricci tensor to zero in the code procceses. I didn't realize why a lot of the code wasn't working. It's because I was trying to run iterative artificial learning code. And since it incorporated the Universal Theory, and did so in a mathematically accurate way (also authenticating it in various ways via code this way is possible) I didn't realize that no matter what I did the code would never work with the full form of the theory, because the Ricci tensor would always vanish to zero in terms of the schwarzschild metric within the subsequent processes running off initial code. And while this was validating for my theory it was equally frustrating to realize it may be a massive hurdle to institutingnit in code.

This unexpected twist threw me into a world where certain possibilities seemed to evaporate into the ether. The task of setting values for the tensor g_ij (the einstein tensor form utilized in the Grand Unified Theory Framework) in code had to demand a lot of intricate modifications.

I found myself utterly lost. I thought the code was specious. Before I thought to check the ricci tensor calculations, Christoffel and Riemann formations and got it running. I think it's quite scary in a way that someone could have similar code with my own or another form of Unified Theory but if they didn't have THAT sufficient of knowledge on relativity, they may never know the code worked. I feel few have attempted to embrace the tangible variations of complex frameworks within code. I wanted to share this because I thought it was interesting as an example of multidisciplinary science. Coding and physics together is always interesting and there isn't a whole lot of support or information for people venturing into these waters sometimes.

I would like to know what everyone thinks of multidisciplinary issues such as this as well, wherein one may entirely miss valuable data by not knowing what to look for, and how that may affect final results and calculations of research and experimentation. In this situation, ultimately I had to employ some of the concepts in my research document to arrive at the Ricci tensor without any formations of Christoffel or Riemann symbols in the subsequent processes. I thought that was interesting from a physics and coding perspective too. Because I never would've know how to parse this code to get it functioning without knowledge of relativity.

I'm currently facing negative cell volume detected error because of weird mesh deformation, ig I might have made mistake in the dynamic mesh setting but I'm unable to pin point my mistake. Also the simulation occurs for a few time steps with ridiculous values of lift and drag coefficients. I'm attaching below the pictures of deformed mesh, lift, drag coefficient curves, my smoothing and remeshing parameters too. Also I'm using a udf to give motion to the cylinder body. The frequency defined in the udf is 1. I had created a total thickness inflation mesh around my cylinder which is of 5 layers, growth rate of 1.2 and maximum thickness of 0.025. Hence, I first separate the cylinder along with the 5 layered inflation from the surface body, then I give the udf motion to both the cylinder and the 5 inflation layers that I had separated. Kindly help me regarding this issue as I've been trying to solve this issue since past 3 weeks, took reference of changing the time step from various articles but still I get the same error.

On the one hand, online social media, which has been developing for 2 decades now, is making a significant contribution to the development of remote online communication, social remote communication, open communication of sending content created on the fly, sending information to friends, promoting oneself and/or specific product or service offers, informal data transfer, expressing one's emotions in the information sent, including positive as well as negative emotions, and so on. In this way, online social media on a local, regional or global scale have also contributed to the objectification of information in the context of news reported in official, meanstream media. In this regard, online social media are fulfilling their role of social and objectification of media information both in countries with democratic power systems and in non-democratic, dictatorial power systems as long as they are not blocked and restricted by the power system.

On the other hand, there has long been a lot of fake news and disinformation in online social media, the transmission and forwarding by more Internet users of memes, posts, videos, banners, comments containing unverified, unconfirmed content, data and information. In addition, new ICT and Industry 4.0 information technologies, new versions of graphic and other applications are being used to generate disinformation. Also, cyber criminals and hackers breaking into social media user profiles, stealing sensitive data of social media users are also using new technologies. Recently, machine learning, deep learning and artificial intelligence technologies have also been used by cybercriminals and untrustworthy social media users to generate disinformation. As part of this, cybercriminals, hackers and unethical Internet users generating disinformation take advantage of security gaps in information systems, exploit diagnosed inadequacies in cyber security tools operating in the aforementioned social media sites. Thus, it is necessary to conduct relentless monitoring of information traffic on these portals, to identify cybercriminal, hacking, fake news and disinformation generating activities, and to improve cyber security systems, instruments, tools as efficiently and quickly as possible.

In view of the above, what prevails in recent times? Do new technologies rather help cyber criminals, hackers and foul Internet users generating disinformation, or do they rather help the development of social media portals and the improvement of cyber security systems?

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

GPT-4 use 156 plugins. In similar approach can be use a plugin for connection GPT-4 with ResearchGate.

What is your vision about the functionality of a plugin for connection GPT-4 to ResearchGate?

Question to software engineering researchers and educators: which excellent recent A-rated research articles (maximum 5 years old) in the software evolution/engineering field to recommend for master-level computer science students without research background (yet). No literature surveys please. All suggestions welcome!

Since the start of the COVID-19 Pandemic, many governments and private organizations allocated large sums of money to fund projects dealing with various areas related to this virus. The vaccine is the most prominent area but detection, caring and monitoring of the patients revealed that the current medical equipment is not adequate and sufficient. Are these funding going to lead to invention or innovation? have you seen any report of innovation in medical technology in your community?

Economics of different countries is collapsed because of COVID-19. What you think? What will be the opportunities of funding at higher studies after this Pandemic? Please share your thoughts regarding this issue. Your valuable thoughts will be highly appreciated.

The theoretical basis for the concept of the essence of artificial intelligence has been developing since the 1960s. Since then, black scenarios of futurological visions, in which autonomous robots equipped with artificial intelligence will be able to reproduce themselves, self-improve, become independent of human control and become a threat to humans, have been created in literature and film of the genre of scence fiction. Nowadays, in the situation of dynamic development of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies, the above-mentioned considerations return to topicality.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In the current era of rapidly developing information technology, the technology of Industry 4. 0, the era of the fourth or perhaps already fifth technological revolution, in the situation of rapidly developing artificial intelligence technologies, building more and more perfect robots and androids, which, equipped with artificial intelligence, can perform a variety of activities until recently performed only by humans and until recently widely recognized as such, which only humans can perform, many new concepts are emerging, full of admiration for the modern technology of new applications of artificial intelligence, but also many new or well-known for many years but now growing in importance concerns about the development of artificial intelligence, including concerns about the consideration of the possibility in the future that the development of artificial intelligence will escape human control. In the context of, on the one hand, admiration and, on the other hand, concerns about the effects and directions of artificial intelligence development in the future, new intriguing questions are emerging. New questions, which, having the character of intriguing questions, activating creative reflection, motivating critical thinking, play a special role in the development of science. For example, this kind of question:

Imagine the situation that a new different but much more perfect version of something similar to ChatGPT is built, for which each person can ask only one question, what would this question be like?

Does this question have such a character, does it activate creative reflection, does it motivate critical thinking? I hope it does.

Please give an example of a question you would ask for a built new much more perfect version of something similar to ChatGPT, for which each person could ask only one question.

Please answer,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear Researchers and Scientists, Friends and Colleagues,

In my opinion, answering the above question, I state that the role of applying the principles of ethics, culture and respect towards other people, other cultures, other value systems, etc. in the development of scientific cooperation, including the conduct of interdisciplinary research projects, scientific cooperation within the framework of international teams of researchers and scientists, within the framework of the ongoing discussions on the discussion forum of this Research Gate portal. Do you agree with me?

In the discussion forum of this Research Gate portal, in order to inspire discussion on various research topics, I have formulated many questions and theses.

I am glad that many of these questions turned out to inspire discussions involving many researchers, scientists, experts in a particular field, people who conduct scientific research on a particular issue, people who publish in their scientific publications the results of their research, people who are interested in a particular issue taken up in the mentioned questions posted on the discussion forum of this Research Gate portal.

I am glad that the questions posed on this discussion forum of the Research Gate portal have proved to be an inspiration for interesting discussions, in which noble researchers and scientists participate. In the course of these discussions, which sometimes take on the character of brainstorming, exchange of ideas, new inspirations for further research topics emerge, new research concepts are formed, proposals for new topics for theses are made, etc. Within the framework of the discussions held, researchers and scientists exchange their experiences of their scientific research, present their research results, inspire scientific cooperation, point out other new insights on certain issues. Thanks to this, there are inspirations for new research directions, for undertaking scientific cooperation in various topics and also for interdisciplinary research teams, etc. This is the key purpose of this discussion forum of the Research Gate portal.

However, I am very saddened when the participating researchers and scientists in the framework of the discussions held, instead of a desire for understanding, understanding, respect towards other people, the participants in the discussions representing other scientific communities, other cultures, other countries instead of respect and culture generate negative emotions, instead of substantive arguments in support of their theses turn to other Persons with invectives and negative expressions, i.e. act contrary to the principles of ethics and the basics of culture, ignoring the principles of ethics of research and science, also ignoring the principles of ethics of this discussion forum. So I very much ask you to follow the rules of culture and respect other people participating in discussions. This is important because aggression generates aggression and respect generates respect. Hopefully, looking to the future, I believe that those fortunately mentioned above situations of negative nature were few and in the future there will be none, and that on the discussion forum of the Research Gate portal, everyone participating in discussions will apply respect to other people, participants in discussions and also regardless of whether other participants in discussions represent other scientific communities, other cultures, other countries and so on.

Faced with the development of various global problems, in trying to solve these problems we should all look for what unites us and not what divides us. This is the key to the development of our scientific cooperation and also to jointly solve various global problems.

Therefore, in the situation of participating in discussions on this Research Gate portal, I therefore very much ask you to apply the principles of ethics, culture and respect for others.

And what is your opinion on this topic?

Please feel free to respond,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Thank you,

I extend my warmest greetings to all participants in the discussions on the Research Gate portal,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I read an article and was intrigued by their use of discourse analysis + computational methods to track word use associations. Does anyone know suitable primers for computational content analysis? Also, they use QDA Miner-WordStat, but it's only available on PC are there MAC versions available?

I'm hoping to supplement qualitative discourse analysis with content analysis.

Please suggest processes and guidelines for young researchers who wish to specialize in their areas of interest.

As with any career, what/who motivated you to be a researcher? Do you feel that ‘you chose research’ or perhaps ‘research chose you’?

I consider myself a philosophical thinker and love new knowledge creation. I enjoy questioning, finding new facts and making new discoveries. Whats your motivation?

Any researcher who is interested in working together in the field of Powers Electronics & Drives, Converter & Inverter Design, MPPT Techniques, Solar Photovoltaic Systems, Microgrid, EV Charging Stations. And also interested in publishing good quality paper. Kindly contact me. And also here Give your suggestion and feedback.

As a research scholar, I feel that a lot of time is wasted in preparing a manuscript according to a journal format. The worst part is that if the paper gets desk rejected, then we have to prepare the manuscript in some other journal style. A lot of time is wasted in this cycle.

When the paper can be type set by the journal after getting accepted, then why dont journal allow a general free format submission.

#I_support_free_format_submission

Would the knowledge of other forms of life on distant exoplanets make it easier to answer the question of the possible purposefulness or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe and its development in evolutionary processes lasting millions or billions of years?

Man has been searching for years for a clear answer to the questions concerning the nature and possible purposefulness or randomness of the origin/emergence of life in the Universe and its development in evolutionary processes lasting millions or billions of years. On the other hand, one of the highly debatable issues is the possibility of the existence of other life forms, including other intelligent life forms on exoplanets many millions of light years distant, located in other planetary systems, other constellations, other stellar constellations, in other galaxies. At present, the most perfect instrument for photographing cosmic objects millions or even billions of light years away that man has built so far is the James Webb Space Telescope. Perhaps with the help of this telescope it will be possible to take photographs of distant exoplanets similar to our planet Earth, which exist in other planetary systems at distances from suns that allow life to originate and develop in the form of evolution on them. If man ever manages in this way to unambiguously confirm the existence of other forms of life on distant exoplanets, then, taking into account the number of galaxies in the known Universe numbering in the billions, the potential number of exoplanets with other forms of life on them can then also be estimated in relatively large numbers. If this is the case, then the question of resolving the possible intentionality or randomness of the emergence, or in fact the multiple and independent emergence of life on many exoplanets many millions of light years distant from each other in the known Universe will also significantly change its interpretative character. In view of the above, an affirmative and unambiguous answer to the question regarding the possible intentionality or randomness of the multiple and independent from each other origin of life on various exoplanets that are many millions of light years distant from each other, i.e. in a situation of unambiguous confirmation of the existence of other forms of life on distant exoplanets, the question of the possible expediency or randomness of the multiple emergence of life in the Universe and its development in processes of evolution of various forms of life lasting millions or billions of years repeatedly, and perhaps also the independent, multiple emergence of intelligent forms of life and of the more or less technologically advanced civilisations built by these various intelligent forms of life should be greatly facilitated. Perhaps with the finest telescope yet built, i.e. the James Webb Space Telescope, it will be possible to photograph exoplanets millions of light years away and obtain evidence of the existence of other life forms on these distant exoplanets similar to our planet Earth. And when this has been achieved, then perhaps the answer to the other questions above will already be facilitated.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on the subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The use of AI in research writing is growing these days, and on the other hand, studies show unethical concerns for the same. Hence, it is important to get your kind attention about this.

In order to continue my research on the meaning of life, I would like to share the following validated questionnaire:

It is completely anonymous and is completed in less than 5 minutes.

I really appreciate the participation and dissemination.

Please share here the links to your favorite Researchgate projects, be it your own or somebody else's, before they go away on March 31. To get things started, here's the link to my own project