Science topic
Research Papers - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Research Papers, and find Research Papers experts.
Questions related to Research Papers
I am working on research papers and want to know the tools and technique used to extract data from research paper.
I am using "Research Publishing" divide as analogous to "Digital Divide", that is, the observation of inequalities or a gap between researchers' potential to publish in class A journals, who live in the southern hemisphere versus those of the north hemisphere.
Many researchers who do not teach in elite universities across the globe (as divided above) have hard times to enter the circle of the A-Journals although researched topics are highly more practical to 80% of the world communities versus the 5% of elite publications and read by less than 20% of the world communities!
What do you think?
I'm new to grant applications, but it has recently been stressed to me how important nice formatting is for winning them. This surprised me, as when I have reviewed grant applications previously, I have simply considered the science behind the study. Am I naive in focusing on the science rather than the aesthetics?
Does anyone have access to Journal of Nanocience and Nanotechnology, I need full text of two articles?
Why the impact factor of journals are different on ResearchGate than Thomson Reuters (ISI web of knowledge) impact factor released 2012?
i want to know why this difference in score of impact factors like Archives of Microbiology is 1.905 by Thomson Reuters (ISI web of knowledge) 2012 but here on ResearchGate is about 1.43 of it and impact factors of most journals are not updated on research-gate. so any one tell how to correct it and why this difference?.
Be happy
These days, the research as such is getting a lot of appreciation and recognition, also for the researchers. But, 1) How much is the public benefitting from this research? 2) How much of the findings are actually relevant in our day to day life? 3) How many of the results are being implemented or tried to be implemented? 4) If we do a cost - benefit analysis of amount of money (government, private agencies, national, external all) and the output to the public (read as the environment, people, resources, energy or anything), what will the output be? 5) Why are researchers just bothered about getting it published in a high impact journal not in and as a common article, or both?
ResearchGate is a useful social-scientific networking site for researchers. Do more members use it on official working days than holidays?
Closed institutes without students have a different work-environment than advanced teaching universities. How do they compare in impact of their respective research contributions?
It offers immediate publication, open peer review and full data deposition and sharing.
Researchers communities through time become encircled in their own political convictions, a fact, that may lead to discriminating against other researchers with different political views as reflected in their writings.
How can research communities regulate such behavior especially that reviewers are not public (anonymous) and there is always an argument to reject a work?
"The future lies in Data and an idea"
As the truth about our world need to be looked at ever more critically, data needs to be correct to arrive at the right conclusions, but as time ticks and knowledge moves further ahead, the results and analysis becomes ever more critical in formulating future political and social structural decisions. The analysis and results should be questioned in the light of new knowledge , but without the original data assumptions are at best guesswork and may or may not be correct.
All data should be available to back up any research and kept on open record for further analysis at a later date.
Peer Review helps to reduce mistakes, but are only good for the time it was published not for future analysis, as we see in climate data. All the algorithms in the world cannot replace actual real data.
Print media has been virtually overtaken by instantaneous dissemination via internet. Advertisements are providing research-work with free access to scientific publications. And yet, many high impact journals sell access to individual users on hefty payment. What future holds in store for end-user?
I am working with Zotero (combined with Dropbox that facilitates the files synchronization), a free citations management tool, I find it simple to work, gives me some features that I like a lot (storing PDFs, tags, synchronization between different computers, ...) and permits the installation of additional functions using extras, like: Zotero Scholar Citations; Zotero Word Integration or ZotFile. This permits ordering by citations counting, or annotate PDFs and extracting notes.
What I would like to know is how you deal with the research sources and if there is a more effective way to work or tool?
For unit, we all know that we need to follow the SI unit, how about engineering terms? Do we have SI for engineering terms? Or do we need to refer to the English dictionary or something like that?
It has mostly been used in assessing art therapy assessments, specifically the Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT). I am interested in knowing how the rating tool does or does not work adequately for various populations, as I am working to make it more reliable in setting norms and making specific standards for various types of clients.
Our project is looking to have our papers published.
A couple of reviewers deciding the fate of one's scientific work and amazingly one is favoring and the other extremely against :)
What are your opinions as I believe that there shall be centralized publishing for the scientific articles i.e one web page asking submission on Artificial Intelligence from around the globe instead of one thousands places to select from. We find hundreds of thousands of Journals and Proceedings that are publishing or rejecting after a review from couple of people where most of them claim to be the area experts but mostly are not. Researchers and students are wasting time to find the right place first and then are rejected due to language/presentation barriers or poor background or sometimes merely some impossible revision suggestions due to reviewers' being inactive researcher. Journals are also making their own monopolies to aim at unnecessary high impact factors. Consequently, many good researchers getting a dumb response due to comparatively above average work but not the well above average . More interestingly, one work is sometimes rejected at a low impact factor place and gets accepted at a higher impact factor.
Open access is even worse as it burdens the authors with heavy amounts.
In my opinion, all the articles shall be published after an initial plagiarism check at one place or forum within a couple of weeks. Let the community decide whether the article is acceptable or not. The articles not cited within next one year shall be removed from the annuls.
I am a PhD candidate. I am writing a dissertation: "What are the factors of failure in the implementation of new project management technology utilizing dashboards as a tool to measure key performance indicators (KPI)." I am seeking 5-10 participants for a field study in project management.
Which is better in your opinion, ResearchGate or Academia.edu?
Include reasons with any answer if possible.
What are the incentives in place (if any)?
Does RG Score really reflect a meaningful impact of a researcher/scholar? I have found an example where it doesn't.
I have just come across an example of a researcher/scholar on Research Gate who's total publications are 185 with a total impact of 336.66 points while his/her RG Score is only 98.67. The split of the RG Score tells that 40% is for Publications, 23% for the Questions asked and 37% for the answers provided. I think if this person had participated lesser in question/answer activity the RG score would have been much higher (perhaps more that 336) which means the ACTIVE INTERACTION, which otherwise must have increased, has actually decreased the overall impact (= RG Score) of a scholar? Doesn't this mean that RG Score calculations are faulty?
It's a simple but relevant question that I'd like to address to all researchers in this site. Possible answers I guess you could give are:
a) Yes, absolutely
b) Well ... yes though everything can be improved
c) Not really but I will sent it for review.
d) Not at all. In fact I will not send it for review.
Does anyone have access to this paper :Post-translational enzyme activation in an animale via optimized conditional protein splicing?
sadly my uni does not have the subscription, to Nature Chemical Biology, could you please send me a pdf copy?
http://www.nature.com/nchembio/journal/v3/n1/full/nchembio832.html#B3
Two of my research papers are published in an international journal with impact factor of 1.125, and a processing fee of 2000 has been paid, is that paper valid or not?
I'm looking for colleagues who combine both perspectives as I do in my work for networking and developing mutual research strategies.
As we all know number of US govt. offices have been shutdown. Due to this, important web sites are either not functioning or not updating. We are frequent users of PubMed and other NCBI web sites. Our research heavily depends on these web sites, particularly on PubMed. I want to know from other users how much it is affecting their research. And whether they will upgrade all information when the PubMed Site will be up?
How much plagiarism can be permissible in a peer reviewed paper?
I want to know the permissible limit in the plagiarism in a research paper can be acceptable!!
Sharing information
how do I let others know that I want to share a project?
Alternative models to measure the quality of research are the personal citation indexes (H-index). Is that true?
Most readers pay attention and read a research paper when its 'Title" generates interest. However, exact statement of the main finding as 'Title' educates the 'in-field' researcher.
To which of the following would you give priority?
Impact factor?
Editorial Board?
Publication Fees?
Subject oriented?
Fast publication process?
Citations?
Any Other?
In our research career, we end up inevitably, with a huge tranche of PDFs/DOCs/Txts scattered across different machines and folders. I was wondering of the best way/software that could help organize the collection, as used by you in your personal capacity.
What do you do when you need help to write a scientific article?
ask for help, read a book, internet?
http://howtopublishinjournals.com/2013/10/07/book-review-how-to-get-research-published-in-journals/
Some Journals, for an example, idnetifies the following under indexing/abstracting. Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cab Abstracts, Compendex, Biological & Agricultural Index Plus, BIOSIS, Current Contents/Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences, Environmental Periodicals Bibliography, GEOBASE, Geographical Abstracts, Hydro-Abstracts, Hydro-Index, International Development Index, Irrigation and Drainage Abstracts, Meteorological and Geoastrophysical Abstracts, Physical Geography. Referativnyi Zhurnal, Scopus, Soils and Fertilizers, TROPAG/RURAL Database, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Agricultural Economics Abstracts, Agroforestry Abstracts, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Environmental Impact, Irrigation and Drainage Abstracts, ProQuest – Biological Sciences, Environment Index, Summon by Serial Solutions etc. Which indexing systems are reputed and accepted widely to consider the Journal as indexed?
Free publication in our International Journal
We are providing free publication services for researchers, who need their work to be known by the world. Our free publication offer will continue for October and November-2013. Interested researchers, send their manuscripts/papers in word format on editor@ijasr.org.
Volunteers in editing and reviewing field are also welcome. Free publication service for editors through out the year. Visit our website: www.ijasr.org for full details.
I have read a paper which presents a high level description of an algorithm. Some steps of the algorithm are described in natural language and are hard to reproduce when trying to implement the code.
After reading other papers related to the original one I have managed to write all the subalgorithms in Pseudocode and implemented and tested the algorithm in C++.
In order to prevent others from going through the entire process again I would like to publish a scientific note which describes all the subalgorithms.
My work does not bring any novel contribution to the existing literature. It is just detailed description of an existing algorithm which might be useful to other researchers.
Most reviewers of academic papers are volunteers, who spend valuable time for research when they try their best to improve our papers and evaluate their appropriateness for publication. Usually, authors welcome constructive criticism and applicable advice on all aspects of their papers offered by reviewers even if they do not follow all suggestions and comments.
As a reviewer I try my best to finish the reviews as soon as possible (in most cases I am asked to finalize the review within four weeks). Very often I think I can help improve a paper, be it the overall organization, the language, or description of theory and methods used to at the results stated. Sometimes I reject the request because I do not have the knowledge needed to seriously review a publication.
As authors we want to get suggestions that are concrete and practical to meet internal or external deadlines. What are your experiences with the review process practiced in the current academic publication setting? Some ideas:
- constructive vs. destructive criticism
- timeliness of review result
- appropriateness of language used by reviewers
- level of understanding the paper under review
I have collected the data and analysed. But writing discussion is little difficult, as I am looking for pathology in brain for psychological symptoms. Please suggest me as to how the discussion part should be written for a paper. What all contents it should hold ?
I established primary normal cell cultures from human foreskin. Then identifying these cells by ICC method with anti-Vimentin and anti-Cytokeratin19 antibodies. The cell showed positive signal to Vimentin and negative signal to Cytokeratin19 (they was expecting results, because only cancer cells show Cytokeratin19). However, I don't know if the ICC's results are enough to demonstrate normal cells? Are these results enough proof to provide to research journals when I would like to submit a paper?
In those journal our paper accepted in 2012, published in 2013. We received their email that Accepted Paper will be Compendex Ei indexed but now in 2013 they are kicked out from Engineering village, now they don't reply and and don't take responsibility even still they are not indexed but written on their website they are indexed. Even though none of their paper is opening in google scholar. the journal belongs to Korea. Not me but many researchers are victim of this case.
In 2010 the author noticed that there is no established notation system for the extra components of human dentition i.e supernumerary teeth and a notation system was devised. But even after it satisfied Peer review of 2-3 International Publications this article was not published by the editor/ publisher. Doesn't this article have evidence based research? Will it not help Public health?
I have many more examples of this bias shown by many a International bias against third world researchers
Publication without publication and processing fee ????
In publishing a research article publishers charge processing fee, and some time in the name of open source publication they charge huge money. Is research publication must not become free from these charges ????
Need help with plagiarism checking tools
Hi everyone,
I am writing a thesis and manuscript, and need to check for plagiarism. Can anybody kindly suggest me good tools to check this.
It is seen that most of the researchers are unable to realize their ideas because
of the lack of funding. So, it is very important to create or ensure a funding
possibility.
Are you changing your methodological approaches? Are you doing lower-quality research? Are you skipping crucial experiments?
I want journals that respond quick
In writing an article I am refereeing to the materials of another article of mine. Would it be fine if I just include the whole article in my appendix?
I have seen this as a norm in thesis writing.
I have noticed some people on research gate have up to 30-50% of papers co-authored with the same individual, who also has high overlap with other individuals. Others show relatively minor overlap. You can see this by looking at the Top Authors link and seeing how many publications a top author has co-written with a person. Is this a sign of a truly collaborative partnership, a sign of different standards for co-authorship, or a sign that some researchers are non independent of one another? I ask this because in the Canadian NSERC funding system, individual grants are supposed to be evaluated based on the quality of the researcher. When people always co-author with the same individuals it becomes challenging to assess them as independent from their co-author. What are people's thoughts on this in terms of evaluating single grants to a research lab?
What is an Indexed Journal?
Is ISSN No is not enough for a journal
I am helping to teach a course on communicating science and through this course, I have come into contact with an absolutely beautiful paper. It is clear, concise, and elegant. I am not at all interested in the subject (it is not the kind of science I do) but the communication is so good that I am still thrilled. I am hoping to find similar quality papers through you all. What is your favorite scientific paper of all time? What is the one you think most clearly got a story across to you? Please do not post your own papers or papers that lack a thorough enough introduction to explain things to a scientist that is not specialized in the field.
The paper I fell for is:
Molecular Computation of Solutions to Combinatorial Problems
Leonard M. Adleman
Science, New Series, Volume 266, Issue 5187 (Nov. 11, 1994), 1021-1024
I have a few research papers that I would like to publish, but I haven't had much luck with journals.
Perhaps I should just wait for conferences and present them? This question is addressed to those of you who have had similar experiences of being rejected by journals; and yet you will not give up because you believe that what you have is worth sharing. Would you care to share your experiences of how you polished up your work and finally got it published? I'm sure there are quite a few of us in the RG community who will be encouraged to press on.
I'm looking for more publishers like Elsevier, Springer etc.
I'm a mechanical engineering student working on CFD and IC Engines.
What's your favourite LaTeX editor ?
Do you like LaTeX?
Which editor are you working with?
I've tried gedit, medit, TeXworks, Kile, TeXStudio, and even Geany, among which I think medit and TeXworks may be the best choices.
What's your favourite LaTeX editor?
Publishing a paper in a conference or in a journal, which is good? Give your suggestions.
How we can decide that a XYZ paper can be sent to a Reputed conference or in reputed journal, Which is more impactful, a conference or a journal?
What are the important guidelines for one who wishes to write a review article for publication in a reputable journal for the first time?
Dissemination may include press releases online and offline. It is because the research should percolate down to the masses to enable them know the utility of ongoing research in their lives.
What about editorials written by senior faculty/ researchers?
Can anyone guide me regarding the strategy to perform a meta-analysis of meta-analyses? Why would one want to perform such a meta-analysis? Is there risk of giving undue weightage to certain data, as some studies may have been included in multiple meta-analysis?
I used to take my notes on a sheet of paper, then I used end note software for recording bibliographic data of my research sources. I want to take my notes digitally and relate them to the bibliographic metadata.
Please introduce me the "Research Tools" that you find it interesting and helpful in assisting the researcher.
"Research Tools" http://www.mindmeister.com/39583892/research-tools-by-nader-ale-ebrahim
The peer-review process is a crucial step in the modern scientific positive method. Often, academic journals use single-blind peer-reviews, where the name of the reviewers are not revealed to the authors of the submitted papers. However, one can find several drawbacks in this method. Here, we focus on the following drawback: referees may not spend enough time to do their review on a paper.
Obviously one does not have any statistics on the number of “botched reviews” – even characterizing what a “botched review” is seems to be delicate. However, it seems rather clear that a totally blind peer-review process leaves some space for some “laziness” from the reviewers. (In my field of research for instance – theoretical physics – I have seen published papers with computational errors from the first to the second equation of a manuscript – which would not have been possible if the referee(s) would have derived the equations in order to verify them.)
Of course, talking about “laziness” for voluntary works is ambiguous – and probably not deserved. However, the step of peer reviewing is crucial for the effectiveness of the scientific method. Therefore, one should try to avoid any lack of work during this crucial step of Science.
However, the question is: how to motivate such a dedication for a pure voluntary work?
Some may think about remuneration as a possible solution. Here we follow another idea.
A solution one can think about is the following:
Once a paper is accepted, the name of the referees who did accept the paper could be revealed within the content of the published version of the paper.
As far as I can see, it keeps all the reasons why one may want to use blind peer-reviews; but it enhances the process for the following reasons:
1/ Necessarily, it imposes the referees to be very cautious when accepting a paper. Indeed, their names being associated to a paper, they risk their reputations if the paper has severe verifiable mistakes in it. Therefore, it obligates referees to be, during their reviewing work, as cautious as they would be for their own research.
2/ It gives a recognition to the work of the referees who may have spent a big amount of time to read and check papers. Eventually, it could be a new source of reputation for researchers who participate in several different ways to the elaboration of our scientific knowledge. (Let us note that recognizing referees already seems to be a new trend in scientific publishing: see for instance the “outstanding referees” list of the APS journals (http://publish.aps.org/OutstandingReferees?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=spring-newsletter2013))
Possible drawbacks:
I imagine one possible drawback of doing so: referees could become less inclined to accept cutting edge research papers. However, I think this drawback may be counter-balanced by the will of researchers of having their own names (somehow) associated to a cutting edge discovery (through the revelation of the referees' names in the published version of a paper).
Your comments:
I would like to hear your comments upon this proposal. Whether you think it is a good or a bad idea, I just would like to know what the reasons are. Also, please indicate your field of research as this proposal might not be adequate for every field of research.
Thank you for your time and your attention!
Which of them do you think have more possibilities in the future?
Being a researcher; Do you think your Superevisor is providing you enough guidence?
?
Does an increase in the number of co-authors have a negative effect on the impact of the first author or the corresponding author? Is the total impact factor of the paper equally distributed among the authors of the paper? What is the actual belief prevalent in the scientific community on this matter? Does the scientific weightage of the research paper depend on the number of coauthors also?
It is becoming common to see mistakes in some published papers.
It is becoming common to see this phenomenon in manuscripts sent to us by some journals to make decisions.
Explanation about the delay in replying to a paper request.
If experimental work was done at institute 1 and then the first author moved to institute 2 (where he exploited data and wrote the article), what should be the affiliation of this author in the article? Institute 1 or 2?
Invite to submit papers (Open Access)
The Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity is accepting submissions in the areas: Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology, Health Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Biological and Applied Sciences, Food/Feed Science and Technology, Biodiversity and Chemistry. The link for this journal is: http://revista.uft.edu.br/index.php/JBB
Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity - JBB is an international journal that publishes original articles of research, short notes and review articles.
There are no fees to publish in JBB. The norms for prepare of the manuscripts are at: http://revista.uft.edu.br/index.php/JBB/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
Doubts can be asked for me: clonageinvitro@yahoo.com.br
I am searching for good journals in medical image processing please suggest me good journals
The publishers are earning big money on our work - even ask ourselves for extra money to be paid to them for extra pages or full color pictures ... while we THE authors get absolutely nothing. Instead, we are even asked to pay the subscription to the journal we are publishing! Would this make sense to a book-writer?
I am going to write an article now based on my previous work. My work is based in silico drug designing for infectious disease. I don't have any experience with writing research articles? Can anyone help me?
Are there basic outlines / points which should be keep in mind while writing any research article?
How does one facilitate Google referrals?
I want to increase my RG score.
When selecting a journal to submit a paper, do you search for Editors or for Journals?
In order to publish successfully in journals, the greatest effort should be made to find the right editor, not the right journal, although they are both inter-related.
http://gaudeamusacademia.com/
I am looking for an example of how the appendices are structured using APA. I would prefer a visual example as I am confused about how to label each table and figure correctly.
I recently did a google search on the title of one of my conference papers and was directed to a website for a Chinese heavy machinery manufacturing company. This was a bit strange since the article focused on the development of an expert system for payrolls at a power company which cited prior pilot systems at an aluminium smelting company.
I would like to know what category to apply in a congress
Where i find my publications?
I not find my published research paper
Peer review is a learning experience, a way to build yor network and an obligation to stay updated in your reserach field.
Want to be a Research paper reviewer or Journal Editor?
If you want to be a voluntary research reviewer/editor for our newly opened journal. then send your profile at: miteenali@gmail.com.
It can enhance research a lot.
P.S: it is voluntary based.
Do you know that there are fake journals?
I have simply written "fake journals" in google and I have gotten a large list of them.
Try yourself.
I've using Word since so many years, but new to LaTeX, and starting seems difficult as there are a lot of commands. Is LaTeX is really better than word?
If an experiment measured different things which are hard to connect to each other (for example, if an experiment tests memory and measured proteins in hippocampus and some are neuronal specific, some are adhesive molecule, some has role in apoptosis, some are vesicular proteins, some receptors etc...) should the paper include only those proteins which has some connection to each other, can go some in supplementary data, or what you would be suggest?
Is it possible to detect the real time ATM card fraud detection using data warehouse based system. I've upto one million transaction dataset in the Oracle database & I need to prepare a fraud detection model based on the dataset available. If it's possible, I'd like to request to provide some links for related research papers.
Perhaps one way is to identify the important bullet points based on experience.
I came across Index copernicus value, Global Impact factor, IIFR , JC etc .Can anyone suggest which Impact factor to be considered best?
The accumulation of power in indexed journals and the competition amongst the academics, are creating a class struggle?
Research journals want original contributions not published elsewhere before. It is common to share results in conferences where the paper would appear in their published proceedings. Can we still send the articles to journals after the research is completed?
The replacement of hygiene and food packaging will be important in new life. The new biomass-based renewable materials will be used for packing materials with optimal mechanical properties, and usage of these materials improves earth`s critical situations. The best option is paper and cardboard, and it can create necessary capabilities with different ways. Coating technologies, nano-cellulose fibers, chemical modification of wood fiber, lignin and hemicelluloses derivatives, methods of chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition, surface-plasma and corona treatments, modified starches, proteins and other biological materials can be used instead of nonrenewable derivatives materials. The new plan is biodegradable coatings on paperboards, which coatings can be completed with two or several layers for barrier and printing properties. These coatings would be enhanced printability and recyclability; also coated substrates can be suitable for protection of packaging mechanical properties.
Many academics review articles for journals without any real support from their institution. We are rarely given any time to do this and end up squeezing the time taken to review articles into already busy schedules. I feel that I really benefit from being a reviewer and that it is important for academics to work together to develop and maintain a rigorous peer-review process, but where is the support?
As plagiarism is a major issue, the scientific community faces across the world, I want to know if there are any free tools or websites which are authentic and detect plagiarism with ease and high accuracy.
A conference paper presentation gives you a platform to interact with people of the same field but journal publication is generally considered superior especially with a good impact factor. What do you think?
In how many years should the PhD be awarded?
I'm working on my mini-thesis final project; a statistics-specific search engine.
Now I'm doing a feature for searching on research paper, and pdf file concerning to statistical domain.
I am in need of some search APIs (then I can do some classification to cut-down the results into statistics-related only). I have tried Microsoft Academic Search and Google Book. Now I need additional APIs for source.
Are there any other search APIs for research paper and pdf file?
Thanks.
Any problem in uploading own papers to ResearchGate from an open access journals?
Related to copyright issue
I am searching for a paper that contains the origin of an approach. but when I searched in internet, I couldn't find it as PDF format.
What is the solution to access papers like this?
It is legal to upload own articles copyrighted by the publishers on ResearchGATE?
I would like to share my publications with who is interested, but I am not aware of the legal provisions in this regard.
Need articles
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22781320
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857909005159
http://aac.asm.org/content/57/4/1926.full.pdf+html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21644082
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927014.2012.714372?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed#.Uabm19I0RFp
http://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00003495-200767030-00003
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2010/np/b804469b
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-010-2468-8
It will be of great help for me.
Thank you very much.
Do you go crazy looking for the right journal for your papers when you need to publish?
At the end it turns out to be like going hunting journals, there are thousands of call for papers that come to your e-mail and many web pages where to go, and eventually as always you have to analyze each journal: its indexation and field of knowledge.