Science topic

Reasoning - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Reasoning, and find Reasoning experts.
Questions related to Reasoning
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
5 answers
I will avoid describing the reasons too much to avoid an avalanche of trolls.
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm not quite sure what you mean by right side of history as the phrase was originally conceived to underwrite new concepts or new forms of totalitarianism, especially representing Russia and China.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Hello,
The Rac proteins are a subfamily of the Rho GTPases. The Rho GTPases are a subfamily of the Ras GTPases. Does the name Rac bear any significance regarding the protein's identity, discovery, or function? Is it an acronym? Was there any rhyme or reason for naming this subfamily Rac?
Thanks you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Rac1 was originally identified in 1989 in human platelets as a substrate of the botulinum toxin from which its name derives as Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate.
Please refer to the article attached below for more information.
Rac1 belongs to the Rho family of small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and is ubiquitously expressed. It exists in two conformational states, an inactive GDP-bound form and an active GTP-bound form. The transition from one form to another occurs upon stimuli and depends on GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which inactivate Rac1, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which convert Rac1 to its active form.
Rac1 has diverse and broad cellular functions. It serves as a conformational switch in several signal transduction pathways. One of its primary functions identified, far away the most characterized, is the regulation of actin cytoskeleton organization and dynamics, in the migratory structures such as filopodia and lamellipodia. Other functions include the role in cell polarity, gene expression, cell-cycle progression, and cell survival.
You may want to refer to the article attached below.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Artificial intelligence (AI) might be the most important technology we ever develop. Ensuring it is safe and used beneficially is one of the best ways we can safeguard the long-term future. Ensuring AI is used to benefit everyone is already a challenge, and it's critical we get it right. As AI becomes more powerful, so does its scope for affecting our economy, politics, and culture. This has the potential to be either extremely good, or extremely bad. On the one hand, AI could help us make advances in science and technology that allow us to tackle the world's most important problems. On the other hand, powerful but out-of-control AI systems ("misaligned AI") could result in disaster for humanity. Given the stakes, working towards beneficial AI is a high-priority cause that we recommend supporting, especially if you care about safeguarding the long-term future.
Why is ensuring beneficial AI important?
We think ensuring beneficial AI is important for three reasons:
  1. AI is a technology that is likely to cause a transformative change in our society — and poses some risk of ending it.
  2. Relative to the enormous scale of this risk, not enough work is being done to ensure AI is developed safely and in the interests of everyone.
  3. There are things we can do today to make it more likely that AI is beneficial.
What is the potential scale of AI's impact?
In 2019, AI companies attracted roughly $40 billion USD in disclosed investments. This number has increased over the last decade, and is likely to continue growing.
Already the results of these investments are impressive: in 2014, AI was only able to generate blurry, colourless, generic faces. But within just a few years, its synthetic faces became indistinguishable from photographs, as you can see below.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Eduard Babulak Please consider this as a partial answer,
it is a warning from the greatest intellecual of the present
time, I'd like to include it in my stochastic model, our
civilisation is going through a decisive moment with this
merciless struggle between powers having no scruples about the
decline of humanity:
Chomsky: The Russia-Ukraine War. If you think about it just
from a practical point of view, it's kind of sadistic,
but people are in fact talking about it to bargain for the
United States that a small fraction of the huge military budget
the United States is severely degrading the military forces of
its main military enemy. That's being openly discussed now in
the United States, and Britain pointing this out. It's pretty
obvious whether that's a factor or not you can debate, but it's
certainly a fact. The United States, in fact, if you look around,
almost the entire world is suffering from this. Ukraine most
but Africa, Asia, and curtailment of food and fertilizer
shipments are having a big effect. Europe is declining even
moving towards industrialization because of its breaking of
its natural trade commercial relations with Russia. The whole
German-based very successful European industrial system
was based on interactions with the East and Russia. Russia
doesn't have much of an economy, it's about the size of Mexico,
but it's very rich in resources, minerals and oil. All the
essentials for West European industry are collapsing. All over
the world decline, one exception, the US is doing brilliantly.
It's degrading the forces of its enemy at very low cost,
fossil fuel companies are just euphoric with the huge profits
that come. Germany's importing the quad national grass from
the United States and far higher costs and it could get cheaply
from Russia and arms manufacturers they're doing great. Food
monopolies there's food. The Global Food system is half a
dozen companies raising prices, profits going through this roof,
it's very successful in many ways. Now, how long will Europe
agree to accept this? I don't know, we do know what's happening
in the global Zone. 10 The refusal of many countries to
participate in the United States' efforts to isolate Russia and
China has become very dramatic. This was highlighted at an
international conference in Munich a couple of weeks ago. The
United States Vice President Harris and other representatives
were desperately trying to get the countries of the South to
join the United States in the world. However, one after another,
they refused, saying, "Mother's your world, we don't pay any
attention to your hypocritical proclamations. We know exactly
what they mean. We've suffered from your savagery for centuries.
Stop lecturing to us. We're not going to take part in this.
We're going to make our own regulation on our commercial and
other religion arrangements with Russia and particularly with
China. You don't like it too bad." Even long-time U.S allies
like Colombia simply flatly refused. Brazil said, "That's not
our woman." While it is unknown what Mexico said, it was
probably something similar. Asia, India, Indonesia said,
"I'm sorry. We continue in our own way."
Conflict_Resolution_chaos_control_modeling_and_simulation_
unexpected_validation
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
I'm working in an industrial field trying to improve some products and amongst them is Giemsa stain. The problem is, our solution cannot stain chromosomes of peripheral blood cells but control slides of other companies' solutions do. What could be the reason of the lack of staining in my solution?
Relevant answer
Answer
I summarize what I realized:
  • you use a modified Giemsa Merck with the addition of acetone
  • at the same time, you stain both your slides and control slides
  • the result is: no coloring of your slides; colouring of the control slides. Is that it?
If you confirm these steps we should think that the problem is not in Giemsa but in the preparation of the samples. What are the samples? If they’re metaphases, how did you get them?
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
I got a liquid starter culture of Thalassiosira Weisflogii microalgae. While the starter culture grows indoors. But it does not grow on agar plates using the F2+si medium. I am seeking reasons for its inability to grow on the petri dishes and solutions to this issue.
Relevant answer
Answer
@all The inability of Thalassiosira weissflogii microalgae to grow on agar plates with F2+Si medium, despite successful growth in a liquid starter culture indoors, could be due to several factors. Let's explore some possible reasons and potential solutions:
  1. Agar Quality: The quality of agar used in agar plates is crucial. Ensure that you are using high-quality agar and that it's properly prepared. Agar that is not properly dissolved or sterilized can inhibit microalgae growth. Try using commercially available agar specifically designed for microbiological purposes.
  2. Medium Composition: Double-check the composition of your F2+Si medium. Any errors in preparing the medium can hinder growth. Make sure you're following the correct recipe, including the appropriate concentrations of nutrients and trace elements.
  3. Sterilization: Ensure proper sterilization of the agar plates and medium. Autoclave the medium and agar plates at the correct temperature and duration to eliminate any potential contaminants.
  4. Temperature and Lighting: Microalgae are sensitive to temperature and lighting conditions. Confirm that the temperature and lighting in your lab are consistent with the conditions in which the microalgae were successfully grown indoors.
  5. Nutrient Availability: Check if the nutrients in the F2+Si medium are accessible to the microalgae on the agar plates. Agar can sometimes form a barrier that prevents microalgae from accessing nutrients. Consider pouring a thinner layer of agar in the plates to ensure better nutrient diffusion.
  6. pH: Microalgae can be sensitive to pH levels. Ensure that the pH of the agar medium is within the suitable range for Thalassiosira weissflogii. Adjust the pH if necessary.
  7. Inoculation Density: The initial inoculation density can affect growth. Ensure you are transferring an adequate number of microalgae cells from the starter culture to the agar plates. Too few cells may not be sufficient to establish growth.
  8. Contamination: Verify that your agar plates are not contaminated with unwanted microorganisms that may be outcompeting the microalgae. Sterilize all equipment and work in a clean environment.
  9. Adaptation: Sometimes, microorganisms require adaptation to a new growth substrate or environment. Try streaking the microalgae on fresh agar plates periodically to see if they eventually adapt and grow.
  10. Subculture: If the microalgae on the agar plates are not growing, consider subculturing them into fresh liquid medium. Once they are actively growing in liquid culture, you can attempt to transfer them back to agar plates.
  11. Consultation: If the issue persists, consider consulting with colleagues or experts in algal cultivation or microbiology. They may provide specific insights into growing Thalassiosira weissflogii on agar plates.
Remember that microalgae cultivation can be sensitive, and troubleshooting may involve several iterations to pinpoint the exact issue. Careful attention to the factors mentioned above and patience in experimenting with different conditions should help you successfully culture Thalassiosira weissflogii on agar plates with F2+Si medium.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
7 answers
Hi,
Why the catalyst (NiMn in 1M KOH) shows such a high Tafel value for HER? How I can interpret and justify in relation to overpotential.
Kindly see the attachment.
Relevant answer
Answer
Suggest reviewing the following paper:
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
8 answers
Qubit gives this error after reading second standard. It asks to read the standards once more or you can close and continue reading the samples but I am not sure if we can use the results. I could not find a detailed explanation in the user manuel. I would be very happy to hear your experience.
Thanks,
Sema
Relevant answer
Answer
The only way to solve this issue is replacement request for a new lot device from Thermo.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
the reason of decreased level of IL5 in patient wit OAB
Relevant answer
Answer
UTI
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
Dear community, I am working on my thesis data and my data analysis shows that there is no relationship between IV and DV, only the indirect relationship exist in presence of 2 mediators (serial mediation). Whereas the literature supports the positive relationship between the IV and DV.
The r square value for the same is very low 0.052.
*all the measurement model criteria i.e, loadings, Cronbach alpha, ave, htmt, vif value meet the criteria.
* all other relationships are significant (iv-mediator-dv)
Now my question is what could be the possible reason for insignificant relationship between IV and DV.
How should I proceed with this.
Why the value of r square for main DV is so low , whereas for mediators its 0.45 and 0.52.
*If I proceed with the same, would it create any problem at time of my PhD Defence.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you, Faheem Uddin Syed for your suggestion. But my data is not facing any such issue.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
I have employed a PtM/C (M= transition metals) based alloy catalyst for the ORR in acid, though i got a good limiting current but the E1/2 is disappointing, i would acknowledge useful suggestions regarding the reasons responsible for poor E1/2 even though the limiting current is much better. According to my understanding the poor kinetic current is due to insufficient exposed active sites on the catalyst, what other factors could be responsible for this issue? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest reviewing the following paper:
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
I am conducting CV analysis of a rGO-based electrode using CHI 650E workstation with platinum foil as counter electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and 1M H2So4 electrolyte. How can I decide the range of potential window that can be applied for the CV analysis? One sample analysis is attached for reference. Also, for many samples I am getting flat line at 1mA. What is reason for this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Kiran Ishwar Nargatti Sensitivity is the value by which the instrument senses the current. You have current in mA. The system will not sense it and will give a flat line unless you change it to 1e-3 and in some cases when 1e-1.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone,
I want to know which modeling strategies and which software are the best to define the parameters governing the behavior of reinforced 3d-printed concrete.
Secondly, the constitutive models of which software are good enough to capture the structural response under various loading conditions reasonably well? Let's say, incorporation of reinforcement, anisotropy of 3d-printed concrete, and its cracking in different directions, crack width, etc.
Relevant answer
Answer
To model reinforced 3D-printed concrete, use Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software like Abaqus or ANSYS, employ constitutive models for concrete behavior, and simulate the printing process with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. Specialized FEA modules handle reinforcement, and fracture mechanics techniques predict crack behavior.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
75 answers
The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory has been censored since 2006. Notable censors are Paul Ginsparg, who keeps a blacklist at the Los Alamos Archives.
I presented my work in several papers (they need a refresh and contain a notable error - the SDSS data analysis) and in Quora, where I tried to educate people and expose my ideas to criticism.
The theory is called a theory of everything because it is fundamental (the least parameterized) and affects all fields of Physics.
I proposed a new model for Matter where particles are polymers of the Fundamental Dilator and derived Natural Laws from first principles.
The basis for the derivation of Natural Laws is three-fold:
a) The Universe is a Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Hypersurface.
b) Particles are polymers of the Fundamental Dilator (FD). FD is a coherence between stationary states of deformation of space. The involved states are the well-characterized electron and proton. This has four implications:
b.1) It explains the plethora of particles with only two states instead of the field that creates them. This is a simplification when one considers Quantum Field Theory. Masses are given by just 3D deformation volume times an energy density, thus eliminating the need for the Higgs Model.
b.2) The FDs shapeshift and spin in a 4D Spatial Manifold, thus eliminating the need for assigning an "intrinsic degree of freedom" to spin. The shapeshifting defines a global ABSOLUTE FREQUENCY for the waves carrying interaction. In HU, the Quantum Lagrangian Principle states simply that FDs will move in a 4D spatial manifold such that they never do any work (or receive work from the spatial deformation). This is an actual Lagrangian Principle (no work done by constraints). It is called Quantum because it is the reason for Quantum Mechanics in material systems. I explicitly said "material systems" because space itself is a quantum system, and it is governed by the Heisenberg Principle.
b.3) HU contains Absolute Time and a preferential reference frame; hence, HU clashes with Relativity, and that is OK since HU succeeds everywhere GR and SR succeeded and also where GR failed (explaining the evolution of the Universe). The existence of an Absolute Time means that one can define an Absolute Frequency of Interaction and apply a Fourier-like model for interaction among particles. Neutrinos are particles that carry torsions for 3D rotations. They are coherences between states distinct from the electron and proton and thus have a distinct frequency. That is the reason for their ghostly nature.
b.4) HU's Fundamental Dilator is based upon a Stroboscopic Principle - one cannot observe phases of the FD that are perpendicular to our 3D Universe (3D hyperspherical hypersurface).
c) The third basis is the Quantum Lagrangian Principle. It governs dynamics and replaces Newton's Laws of Dynamics while introducing Quantum Mechanics.
HU derived an epoch-dependent Law of Gravitation where G is inversely proportional to the 4D radius of the Universe. Dirac tried to achieve the same using Numerology. An argument based on numerology was not convincing enough. HU derived the laws of Nature. That should be enough.
Epoch-dependent G is necessary to make HU consistent with the Supernova Cosmology Project data. HU's Cosmic Distance Ladder is simple:
d(z) = R_0 * z/(1+z)
For that to make sense, HU introduces a new model for the Photon (it becomes a waving on the top of another wave - the dilaton field).
Epoch-dependent G also solves the problem of "Impossibly Early Galaxy Formation." I will provide a new model for galaxy formation in my next paper.
Of course, HU also provides a new taxonomy for particle physics (replacing the standard model of particle physics) and provides the path to do non-perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics - eliminating the need to sum perturbation terms from Feynman Path Integrals).
The new model for the Universe creation is called The Big Pop Cosmogenesis. It is possible because HU's Universe contains only space, deformed space, and time. That is the simplest possible model.
Copycats and plagiarizers abound. You might have heard about similar ideas. The problem they have is that stealing just part of my ideas doesn't make a theory.
Below is a list of links:
There is a theory that reproduces Einstein's successes and avoids Einstein's failures and that is Quantum Mechanical... It is called The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory (HU).
HU Basics
Recasting Newton's Laws of Dynamics in the Space Stress Strain Paradigm
Here, I created a map for the observable and unobservable Universe and located Earth on it:
Here is how I created the map of the Hyperspherical Universe from the knowledge obtained by the Planck Satellite:
3D galaxy density map of the current universe:
Here is how I challenged Einstein's theory:
Here is my take on the Dark Stuff:
HU achievements
HU explaining JWST observations:
Here, I explained why the Universe has four spatial dimensions by calculating the probability of universes of different dimensionalities.
The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - replacement to the Big Bang
Big Pop Article
In how many ways can Dr. Marco Pereira prove Einstein wrong
The MAIN REASONS Einstein's Theory is wrong: a) Einstein missed an extra spatial dimension, b) The theory should use ABSOLUTE VELOCITY instead of calling everything Relative.
The first way Dr. Marco Pereira proves Einstein wrong.
The second way Dr. Marco Pereira proves Einstein wrong.
The third way Dr. Marco Pereira proves Einstein wrong.
How to get GR success without GR
For HIGH IQ people
REFERENCES
Smarandache, F. (2007). Hadron Models and related New Energy issues. "Hadron models and related New Energy issues" by Florentin Smarandache
Smarandache, F., & Christianto, V. (2007). Quantization in Astrophysics, Brownian Motion, and Quantization in Astrophysics, Brownian Motion, and Supersymmetry Supersymmetry. "Quantization in Astrophysics, Brownian Motion, and Supersymmetry" by Florentin Smarandache and Victor Christianto
Pereira, M. (2017). The Hypergeometrical Universe: Cosmogenesis, Cosmology and Standard Model. World Scientific News, 82, 1–96.
Pereira, M. (2018). The Case for a Fourth Spatial Dimension and the Hyperspherical Force. World Scientific News, 98, 127–139.
Pereira, M. (2018). The Hypergeometrical Force: The Coma Cluster without Dark Matter. World Scientific News, 101, 222–228.
Pereira, M. (2019). The Optical Path of Ancient Photons and the Supernova Project. World Scientific News, 130, 195–215.
Pereira, M. (2017). The Hypergeometrical Universe: Cosmogenesis, Cosmology and Standard Model. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 17(5).
Pereira, M. A. (2010). The Hypergeometrical Universe: Cosmology and Standard Model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1316(1).
Marco Pereira. The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - Equation of State, this article.
Relevant answer
Answer
Marco Pereira "I don't want the author of the model to be the judge of my critique."
Now I understand. You are not interested in an open factual discussion. The concept of force field energy density seems to be in contradiction to your work. Therefor you see this concept as something which sheds a bad light on your work.
But look, it is a concept, a way to understand nature. You cannot enforce that a concept must be abandoned. Your only option is to refute it by factual arguments. There is no legal way to prohibit publishing that concept.
You better should find a way correcting your own work and make it compatible to the concept of energy density in force fields.
Following such a way could be painful and enforce rethinking about claims you might already had considered of being sure. But this is the only way to avoid the loss of reputation.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
I am fabricating a small diameter vascular graft using the technique electrospinning. I am facing a problem of formation of spikes in the collected fiber after a certain thickness, if possible can anyone help me to find the reason for it and provide me with your valuable suggestion to overcome this.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Vinith,
Do you have an SEM image of the spikes? What does it look like? That will help me give specific comments.
But I think controlling humidity is a good idea. In other words, run your recipe at a low humidity level. That will help overcome beads in fibers. Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
During the match that took place between YouTubers around the world, there were only male members playing on the field. However, there are many female YouTubers who have a large number of followers. What is the reason that this only happened to a certain gender and did not happen to the other gender?
Relevant answer
Answer
Global feminist movement encounters a range of formidable obstacles that impede its progress. Cultural and religious norms often act as powerful barriers, with deeply ingrained traditions and beliefs framing gender equality as a challenge to established cultural values. Resistance and backlash from individuals and institutions threatened by feminist gains are common, manifesting through online harassment and legal constraints. A critical issue lies in the recognition and inclusion of intersectionality, acknowledging that gender intersects with race, class, sexuality, and disability, among other factors. Neglecting this aspect can lead to the exclusion of marginalized voices within the feminist movement. Furthermore, political opposition from governments that actively restrict feminist activities or funding poses a substantial challenge, limiting the resources available to feminist organizations and hindering their advocacy efforts. Economic disparities, including the persistent gender pay gap and financial inequities, further compound these challenges. In navigating these obstacles, the global feminist movement must remain resilient, adaptable, and committed to addressing these complex issues to advance gender equality worldwide.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Mouse intestinal organoids were growing fine until 3 passages. After that, I passages them last Friday and left for the weekend. Monday I found that they were dying. I am not sure what is the reason for that. I am using the protocol of Intestinal Epithelial Organoid Culture with IntestiCult™ Organoid Growth Medium (Mouse). Instead of matrigel dome , I am using Cultrex UltiMatrix Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Extract dome. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Here are some images.
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm not an expert in intestinal organoids, and its hard to see in the pictures, but could there be a contamination?Or could the media components be expired or stored wrong? Usually they are only good for 2 weeks in the fridge.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
I did a reaction, basically it is the thiol-Michael Addition where I tried to conjugate a -SH group to the double bound of an acrylate group. The reaction was aided with TCEP/TEA as catalyst. After the reaction, the acrylate group signals disappeared and new signals appeared which I suspected were due to the addition reaction. However, the peaks or signals showed high estimate of protons which I can't account for (x 3 folds more). Please can anyone help me with what possibly could be the cause of this? Thank you for your anticipated assistance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree in 100% with Gerhard!
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
I know AMC resonant frequency at phase 0 ! I read many paper, some AMC S11 are near 0 dB some are below -10 dB. I want to know which is correct ?
My point of view is near 0 dB, because AMC is for reflecting the wave in phase. That the reason why antenna gain rise !
Is AMC only for gain increasing ?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is better to design AMCs which have S11 values nearly equals to 1 or 0 dB. AMCs are widely used for the design of metasurfaces. Their application areas are not limited to gain enhancement only.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
61 answers
By reason of the application of the Lorentz Factor [(1 - (v squared / c squared)) raised to the power of 1/2] in the denominator of equations, luminal and other comparable energy propagations take on one and the same velocity. This is the relativity-effect (better, comparative effect) between v of objects, compared to c of the speed of light. That is, it is presupposed here that c is the object of comparison for determining the speed effect of velocity difference across a duration.
It is against the criterion-velocity itself c that c becomes unsurpassable! Hence, I am of the opinion that the supposed source-independence is nothing but an effect of OUR APPARATUS-WISE OBSERVATION LIMIT AND OUR FIXING OF THE CRITERION OF OBSERVATION AS THE OBSERVED VELOCITY OF LIGHT.
In this circumstance, it is useless to claim that (1) luminal and some other energy propagations with velocity c are source-independent, and (2) these wavicles have zero rest mass, since the supposed source-independence have not been proved theoretically or experimentally without using c cas the criterion velocity. The supposed source-independence is merely an effect of c-based comparison.
Against this background, it is possible to be assured that photons and other similar c-wavicles are extended particles -- varying their size throughout the course of motion in the spiral manner. Hence the acceptability of the term 'wavicle'. Moreover, each mathematical point of the spiral motion is to be conceived not as two-, but as three-dimensional, and any point of motion added to it justifies its fourth dimension. Let us call motion as change.
These four dimensions are measuremental, hence the terms 'space' (three-dimensional) and 'time' (one-dimensional). This is also an argument countering the opinion that in physics and cosmology (and other sciences) time is not attested!
The measurements of the 3-space and measurements of the 1-time are not in the wavicles and in the things being measured. The measurements are the cognitive characteristics of the measurements.
IN FACT, THE EXTENSION OF THE WAVICLE OR OTHER OBJECTS IS BEING MEASURED AND TERMED 'SPACE', AND THE CHANGE OF THE WAVICLE OR OTHER OBJECTS IS BEING MEASURED AND TERMED 'TIME'. Hence, the physically out-there-to-find characteristics of the wavicles and objects are EXTENSION AND CHANGE.
Extension is the quality of all existing objects by which they have parts. This is not space. Change is the quality by which they have motion, i.e., impact generation on other similar wavicles and/or objects. This is not time. Nothing has space and time; nothing is in space and time. Everything is in Extension-Change.
Any wavicle or other object existing in Extension-Change is nothing but impact generation by physically existent parts. This is what we term CAUSATION. CAUSALITY is the relation of parts of physical existents by which some are termed cause/s and the others are termed effect/s. IN FACT, THE FIRST ASPECT OF THE PHYSICALLY ACTIVE PARTS, WHICH BEGINS THE IMPACT, IS THE CAUSE; AND THE SECOND ASPECT IS THE CAUSE. Cause and effect are, together, one unit of continuous process.
Since energy wavicles are extended, they have parts. Hence, there can be other, more minute, parts of physical objects, which can define superluminal velocities. Here, the criterion of measurement of velocity cannot be c. That is all...! Hence, superluminal velocities are a must by reason of the very meaning of physical existence.
THE NOTION OF PHYSICAL EXISTENCE ('TO BE') IS COMPLELTEY EXHAUSTED BY THE NOTIONS OF EXTENSION AND CHANGE. Hence, I call Extension and Change as the highest physical-ontological Categories. A metaphysics (physical ontology) of the cosmos is thus feasible. I have been constructing one such. My book-length publications have been efforts in this direction.
I invite your contributions by way of critiques and comments -- not ferocious, but friendly, because I do not claim that I am the last word in any science, including philosophy of physics.
Bibliography
(1) Gravitational Coalescence Paradox and Cosmogenetic Causality in Quantum Astrophysical Cosmology, 647 pp., Berlin, 2018.
(2) Physics without Metaphysics? Categories of Second Generation Scientific Ontology, 386 pp., Frankfurt, 2015.
(3) Causal Ubiquity in Quantum Physics: A Superluminal and Local-Causal Physical Ontology, 361 pp., Frankfurt, 2014.
(4) Essential Cosmology and Philosophy for All: Gravitational Coalescence Cosmology, 92 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 2nd Edition.
(5) Essenzielle Kosmologie und Philosophie für alle: Gravitational-Koaleszenz-Kosmologie, 104 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 1st Edition.
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
42 answers
ESSENTIAL REASON IN PHYSICISTS’ USE OF LOGIC:
IN OTHER SCIENCES TOO!
Raphael Neelamkavil, Ph.D., Dr. phil.
1. The Logic of PhysicsPhysics students begin with meso-world experiments and theories. Naturally, at the young age, they get convinced that the logic they follow at that level is identical with the ideal of scientific method. Convictions on scientific temper may further confirm them in this. This has far-reaching consequences in the concept of science and of the logic of science.
But, unquestionably, the logic behind such an application of the scientific method is only one manner of realizing (1) the ideal of scientific method, namely, observe, hypothesize, verify, theorize, attempt to falsify for experimental and theoretical advancements, etc., and (2) the more general ideal of reason.
But does any teacher or professor of physics (or of other sciences) instruct their students on the advantages of thinking and experimenting in accordance with the above-mentioned fundamental fact of all scientific practice in mind, or make them capable of realizing the significance of this in the course of time? I think, no.
This is why physicists (and for that matter all scientists) fail at empowering their students and themselves in favour of the growth of science, thought, and life. The logic being followed in the above-said mode of practice of scientific method, naturally, becomes for the students the genuine form of logic, instead of being an instantiation of the ideal of logic as reason. This seems to be the case in most of the practices and instruction of all sciences till today. A change of the origin, justification, and significance of the use of logic in physics from the very start of instruction in the sciences is the solution for this problem. The change must be in the foundations.
All humans equate (1) this sort of logic of each science, and even logic as such, with (2) reason as such. Reason as such, in fact, is more generic of all kinds of logic. Practically none of the professors (of physics as well as of other sciences) terms the version of logic of their science as an instantiation of reason, which may be accessed ever better as the science eventually grows into something more elaborate and complex. Physicist gets more and more skilled at reasoning only as and when she/he wants to grow continuously into a genuine physicist.
As the same students enter the study of recent developments in physics like quantum physics, relativity, nano-physics (Greek nanos, “dwarf”; but in physics, @ 10-9), atto-physics (@ 10-18), etc., they forget to make place for the strong mathematical effects that are due by reason of the conceptual and processual paradoxes due to epistemological and physical-ontological difference between the object-sizes and the sizes of ourselves / our instruments. The best examples are the Uncertainty Principle, the Statistical Interpretation of QM, Quantum Cosmology, etc.
They tend to believe that some of these and similar physics may defy our (meso-physical) logic – but by this mistakenly intending that all forms of reasoning would have to fail if such instances of advanced physics are accepted in all of physics. As a result, again, their logic tends to continue to be of the same level as has been taken while they did elementary levels of physics.
Does this not mean that the ad hoc make-believe interpretations of the logic of the foundations of QM, Quantum Cosmology, etc. are the culprits that naturally make the logic of traditional physics inadequate as the best representative of the logic of nature? In short, in order to find a common platform, the logic of traditional and recent branches of physics must improve so to adequate itself to nature’s logic.
Why do I not suggest that the hitherto logic of physics be substituted by quantum logic, relativity logic, thermodynamic logic, nano-logic, atto-logic, or whatever other logic of any recent branch of physics that may be imagined? One would substitute logic in this manner only if one is overwhelmed by what purportedly is the logic of the new branches of physics. But, in the first place, I wonder why logic should be equated directly with reason. The attempt should always be to bring the logic of physics in as much correspondence with the logic of nature, so that reason in general can get closer to the latter. This must be the case not merely with physicists, but also with scientists from other disciplines and even from philosophy, mathematics, and logic itself.
Therefore, my questions are: What is the foundational reason that physicists should follow and should not lose at any occasion? Does this, how does this, and should this get transformed into forms of logic founded on a more general sort of physical reason? Wherein does such reason consist and where does it exist? Can there be a form of logic in which the logical laws depend not merely on the size of objects or the epistemological level available at the given object sizes, but instead, on the universal characteristics of all that exist? Or, should various logics be used at various occasions, like in the case of the suggested quantum logic, counterfactual logic, etc.?
Just like logic is not to be taken as a bad guide by citing the examples of the many logicians, scientists, and “logical” human beings doing logic non-ideally, I believe that there is a kernel of reason behind physics, justified solely on the most basic and universal characteristics of physical existents. These universals cannot belong solely to physics, but instead, to all the sciences, because they belong to all existents.
This kernel of reason in physics is to be insisted upon at every act of physics, even if many physicists (and other scientists and philosophers) may not ensure that kernel in their work. I shall discuss these possibly highest universals and connect them to logic meant as reason, when I elaborate on: 3. The Ontology of Physics (in a forthcoming discussion in RG)
The matter on which physicists do logical work is existent matter-energy in its fundamental implications and the derivative implications from the fundamental ones. This is to be kept in mind while doing any logically acceptable work physics, because existent matter-energy corpora in processuality delineate all possible forms of use of logic in physics, which logic is properly to be termed nature’s reason.
Moreover, conclusions are not drawn up by one subject (person) in physics for use by the same subject alone. Hence, we have the following two points to note in the use of logic in physics and the sciences: (1) the intersubjectively awaited necessity of human reason in its delineation in logical methods should be upheld at least by a well-informed community, and (2) the need for such reason behind approved physics should then be spread universally with an open mind that permits and requires further scientific advancements.
These will make future generations further question the genuineness of such logic / specific realization of reason, and constantly encourage attempts to falsify theories or their parts so that physics can bring up more genuine instantiations of human reason. But is such human reason based on the reason active in nature?
Although the above arguments and the following definition of logic in physics might look queer or at least new and unclear for many physicists, for many other scientists, for many mathematicians, and even for many logicians, I define here logic for use in physics as the fundamental aspect of reason that physics should uphold constantly in every argument and conclusion due from it:
Logic in physics is (1) the methodological science (2) of approaching the best intersubjectively rational and structural consequences (3) in what may be termed thought (not in emotions) (4) in clear terms of ever higher truth-probability achievable in statements and conclusions (5) in languages of all kinds (ordinary language, mathematics, computer algorithms, etc.) (6) based on the probabilistically methodological use, (7) namely, of the rules of all sensible logics that exemplify the Laws of Identity, Non-contradiction, and Excluded Middle, (8) which in turn must pertain to the direct and exhaustive physical implications of “to exist”.
Here I have not defined logic in physics very simply as “the discipline of the rules of thought”, “the discipline of the methodological approach to truths”, etc., for obvious reasons clarified by the history of the various definitions of logic.
But here comes up another question: Is the reason pertaining to physical nature the same as the most ideal form of human reason? From within the business of physics, how to connect the reason of physical nature with that of humans? I may suggest some answers from the epistemological and ontological aspects. But I would appreciate your responses in this regard too.
2. The Epistemology of Physics (in a forthcoming discussion in RG)
3. The Ontology of Physics (in a forthcoming discussion in RG)
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
Hello, I'm working with iPSCs and culturing them on feeder-free conditions using Matrigel. I'm using the Corning Matrigel for Organoid Culture as that was the only Matrigel that was being shipped in a reasonable amount of time. But now I'm having some trouble with cell attachment.
The colonies are rolling up after a few days. I'm not sure if it's because of the Organoid Matrigel or because of ROCKi removal (because I notice the detachment after I remove ROCKi as well) or a mix of both.
Has anyone faced this particular issue before or noted any differences in monolayer culture with the two different Matrigels? From what I can understand from the product documentation, both Matrigels are EHS tumor ECM with the only difference being the Organoid one being optimized for organoid culture. But the components are ultimately the same.
Relevant answer
Answer
Corning® Matrigel® matrix for organoid culture (Cat. No. 356255) is a kind of growth factor reduced Matrigel matrix which is recommended for organoid culture. Matrigel matrix for organoid culture is pre-screened to support the organoid application and minimizes variability across different lots. It has been verified to support mouse intestinal organoid growth for more than seven passages with typical budding morphology and marker expression. It has also been verified to support polarized 3D structures of primary human airway epithelial cells expressing typical markers. Additionally, each lot is measured for its elastic modulus indicative of gel stiffness and is qualified to form stable “3D domes” commonly used in organoid culture protocols.
A normal Matrigel matrix, usually referred to as Matrigel basement membrane matrix (Cat. No. 354234), is not growth factor reduced which contains higher GF concentrations than Matrigel matrix for organoid culture. Matrigel basement membrane matrix is recommended in general cell culture and vessel coating.
Both products might vary lot-to-lot when being used in iPSC culture. The most stable performance in iPSC culture is brought by hESC-qualified Matrigel matrix (Cat. No. 354277). hESC-qualified Matrigel matrix is recommended for culture of hESC, stem cells, and iPSC.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
What challenges occur in India when the summer monsoon is irregular and what are the reasons for break in monsoon in different regions?
Relevant answer
Answer
The reason for such breaks is the movement of monsoon trough. The monsoon trough moves periodically to the north or south from its actual position. When the trough moves towards the north and settle close to the Himalayas, then a change in the rainfall pattern occurs. The break in the monsoon is a complex phenomenon caused by the shifting of the monsoon trough, an area of low pressure that develops due to intense solar insolation over northwest India. While it causes heavy floods in one part, it may be responsible for droughts in the other. It is often irregular in its arrival and its retreat. Hence, it sometimes disturbs the farming schedule of millions of farmers all over the country. The spectacular arrival of monsoon winds at the end of the summer season is called 'Burst of monsoon'. Burst of monsoon is a phenomenon in which there is a sudden change in weather condition from hot and dry weather to wet and humid climate characterized by rainfall. A Monsoon Break occurs when there are few or no rains for a few days during the rainy season. The seasonal reversal in wind direction during a year is called monsoon. Monsoon tends to have 'breaks' in rainfall; which means that there are wet and dry spells in between. The monsoon rains take place only for a few days at a time and then come the rainless intervals. Burst of Monsoon occurs when it rains constantly for many days. In the Burst of monsoon, the intensity of rainfall is very high. In case of Break of monsoon, the intensity of rainfall is mild. There is continuous rainfall and also heavy intensity. There are breaks in rainfall, and it is not continuous and there is a combination of both dry and wet. The monsoon rain is unevenly distributed over India because most parts of India receive relief rainfall; therefore windward sides always receive more rainfall than the leeward side. This unevenness or asymmetry in rainfall patterns has certain impacts: Areas with little precipitation can lead to drought, while areas with prolonged heavy downpours can lead to floods. This irregularity in rainfall distribution all over the world is known as uneven rainfall.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
It's a dumb question maybe, but I'm not sure how to proceed.
Suppose you have two different models which generate molecules (in the form of coordinates of atoms). The molecules generated by models are not the same.
Next, you have a method to evaluate energy of a molecule (given atomic coordinates, it outputs a number). I can also optimize atomic coordinates with this method.
The question is, how to compare these two generative models in terms of energy?
My guess is that I can run minimization for each configuration and can evaluate dE = E_final - E_initial. But how can I compare/aggregate dE between different molecules? My guess is that to have a crude estimate one can divide these quantities by the total charge of the nuclei in the molecule (which equals to the number of electrons for neutral molecules). Is this reasonable or better ways exist?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr. Kadim,
Do a CHN analysis and an Atomic Absorption for the Ag.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
There are still a huge number of direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuels at all levels. Main reason is to sustain national industries and improve their competitiveness. In addition, it is deemed that low-income families should be supported for their Energy expanses. For these reasons, I think, governments are very reluctant to withdrawn subsidies. Maybe an EU directive could put all the Country subsidies at similia Level and improve fair competition in the EU market, releasing big financial amount for the renewables.
We could start from an harmonisation of the VAT in all member states.
Relevant answer
Answer
An EU Directive ( or even a Regulation) would first have to be adopted by the majority of Member States (MS) of EU according to the procedure. Each country has a vote according to it size. So 3 big MS against and the measure would not even proposed since neither the Commission nor MS want to waste time and effort. In any case you raise an issue of industrial policy where MS have positions which reflect where they have long held policies in this area depending on whether they have or have access to cheap energy or not. Can or Would the European Parliament adopt a Motion requesting the Council and Commission to adopt the measures that you are keen on? It would be a first!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
PRIMES LDS software (PRIMES LASER DIAGNOSTIC SOFTWARE) is a well known tool for M2 measurements for laser beams. Anyone working with the software? Want to know the reason for taking multiple planes to measure M2. When we want to take a final result, which plane should be looked in to? If we are measuring a closer to a single mode beam, does each plane should give a Gaussian intensity distribution?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Chathurangani,
as Michael already pointed out, the measurement of M2 needs the profile in multiple planes of the beam caustic. As the product of beam waist and far field divergence (hence the name "beam parameter product"), both regions have to be measured, typically at at least 10 positions. The details can be found in the ISO standard 11146 and is implemented in the LDS.
Regarding the question of which plane to look at, it depends a bit on what your interested in. But yes, as already mentioned, a fundamental TEM00 (gaussian) mode would be shape-invariant (just scaling) along the propagation. By the way, pure higher TEM modes are also shape-invariant, although with a higher M2 value.
Best
Andreas
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
10 answers
PLANCK ERA / QUANTUM ERA and “DISAPPEARANCE” OF PHYSICAL CAUSALITY: FALLACIES FROM “OMNIPOTENCE” OF MATHEMATICS
Raphael Neelamkavil, Ph.D. (Quantum Causality),
Dr. phil. (Gravitational Coalescence Cosmology)
Cosmologists and quantum cosmologists seem to be almost unanimous (but happily today, a bit decreasingly unanimous) that, at the so-called level of the Planck era / quantum era of the original state of the big bang (of our universe, or of an infinite number of such universes existent in an infinite-eternal multiverse – whichever the case may be), where all forces are supposed to be unified or quasi-unified (but always stated without any solid proof), (1) either there did not exist and will never exist causality, (2) or any kind of causality is indistinguishable from the normal course of physical existents.
Is this sort of cosmological theorizing acceptable, where (1) the unification is supposed but is not necessarily physical-ontologically presupposable, and (2) causality and non-causality are taken in the mood of dilemma? This sort of theorizing is, of course, based on some facts that most physicists and other scientists agree on without much effort to search for causes of approval or disapproval.
But the adequacy of such reasons for this conclusion is questionable. The manner of concluding to non-causality or indistinguishability of causality and non-causality at spots in the universe or multiverse, where all forces are supposed to be unified or quasi-unified, is questionable too. The main reason is the lack of physical-ontological clarity regarding the status of causality and the status of unification of the forces.
In my opinion, this is based on the inevitable fact that whatever the mathematics automatically prescribes for such situations can be absolute only if all the parameters, quantities, etc. that have entered the equations are absolute. The prescribed necessity condition has not been the case in the physics that goes into the mathematical formulation of the said theory.
Even concerning the measurement that humanity has so far made of the speed of light is not exact and absolute. The reason for the fantastic cosmological conclusion regarding a volatile decision for or against causality and regarding a supposed verity of the supposition that all forces are unified therein, does not possess an adequate mathematical reason, and of course not a sufficiently physical.
The reason I gave is not strictly and purely mathematical, physical, or just generally philosophical. It is strictly physical-ontological and mathematical-philosophical. Things physical-ontological are not “meta-”physical in the sense of being beyond the physical. Instead, they treat of the preconditions for there being physics and mathematics. They being pre-conditions, not respecting them leads to grave theoretical problems in mathematics, science, and philosophy.
Hence, in my opinion, fundamentally mathematical-ontological and physical-ontological presuppositions and reasons are more rationally to be acceptable for the foundations of mathematics and physics than all that we have as strictly mathematical and physical in the name of foundations. I give here the obvious in order to assure clarity: I presuppose that physical ontology consists of the necessary presuppositions of anything dealt with in physics, astrophysics, cosmology, and other purely physical sciences, and of course of the mathematics and logic as applied to existent physical things / processes.
The main reason being considered for the so-called non-causality and indistinguishability between causality and non-causality at certain cosmological or physical spots seems to be that space and time could exist only with the big bang (or whatever could be imagined to be in place of it), whether just less than 14 billion years ago or doubly or triply so much time ago or whatever.
First, my questions on this assumption are based on an antagonism that I have to cosmologists lapping up the opinion expressed by St. Augustine centuries ago. That is, if space and time “exist” only if and from the time when the universe exists, then the question of space and time before the expansion of the universe is meaningless. These cosmologists presume that the expansion of the universe was from a nullity state, and that hence it could not have existed before the beginning of the expansion. What if it existed from eternity like a primeval stuff without any change and then suddenly began to explode? This is the basic premise they seem to hold, and then conclude that time, as an “existent” now, would not have existed before the expansion! What a clarity about the concept of existence! Evidently, this is due to the gaping absence of regard for the physical-ontological presuppositions behind physical existence.
Secondly, as is evident, some of them think that space and time are some things to exist beyond or behind all the physical processes that exist. Thus, some identify space even with ether. If we have so far only been able to measure physical processes, why to call them as measures of space and time? Why not call them just as what it is, and accept that these are termed as space and time merely for ease? After all, whatever names we give to anything does not exist; and we have not seen space and time at all.
Thirdly, is it such a difficult thing for scientists to accept the lack of evidence of any sort of “existence” of space and time as background entities? Einstein spoke not of the curvature of existent spacetime, but of the mathematical calculations within a theory of the measurementally spatiotemporal aspect of existent physical processes as showing us that the measurementally spatiotemporal aspect of the physical processes – including existent energy-carrier gravitational wavicles – is curving within mathematical calculations.
Now, if the curvature is of existent processes (including existent energy-carrier gravitational wavcles), then, at the so-called primeval spot in each existent universe (even within each member of an infinite-eternal multiverse containing an infinite number of finite-content universes like ours) where all forces are supposed to be unified or quasi-unified, there cannot be a suspension of causation, because nothing existent can be compressed or rarefied into absolute nullity and continue to exist.
This demonstrates that, even at the highly condensed or rarefied states, no existent is nothing. It continues to exist in its Extended and Changing nature. If anything is in Extension-Change-wise existence, it is nothing but causal existence, constantly causing finite impacts.
Why, then, are some cosmologists and theoretical physicists insisting that gravitons do not exist, space and time are entities, gravitation is mere spacetime curvature, causality disappears at certain spots in the cosmos (and in quantum-physical contexts), etc? Why not, then, also say that material bodies are merely spacetime curvature and cannot exist? Is this not due to undue trust in the science-automation powers of mathematics, which can only describe processes in a manner conducive to its foundations, and not tell us whether there is causation or not? I believe that only slavishly mathematically automated minds can accept such claims.
Examples of situations where causality is supposed to disappear are plenty in physics. More than century of non-causal interpretations within Uncertainty Principle, Double Slit Experiment, EPR Paradox, Black Hole Singularity, Vacuum Creation of Universes, etc. are clear examples of physicists and cosmologists becoming prey to the supposed omnipotence of mathematics and their unquestioning faith in the powers of mathematics.
It is useless, in defence of mathematics and physics, to cite here the extreme clarity and effectiveness of mathematical applications in instruments in space-scientific, technological, medical, and other fields. Did I ever question these precisions and achievements? But do the clarity and effectivity of mathematics mean that mathematics is absolute? If they can admit that it is not absolute, then let them tell us where it will be relative and less than absolute. Otherwise, they are mere believers in a product of the human mind, as if mathematics were given by a miraculously active almighty space and time.
All physicists need to recognize that all languages including mathematics are constructions by minds, but with foundations in reality out-there. Nothing can present the physical processes to us absolutely well. Mathematics as applied in physics (or other sciences) is an exact science of certain conceptually generalizable frames of physical processes. This awareness might help physicists to de-absolutize mathematical applications in physics.
Fourthly, the above has another important dimension. Physics or for that matter any other science cannot have at its foundations concepts that belong merely to the specific science. I shall give an example as to how some physicists think that physics needs only physical concepts at its foundations: To the question what motion is, one may define it in terms allegedly merely of time as “the orientation of the wave function over time”. In fact, the person has already presupposed quantum physics here, which is clear from his mention of the wave function, which naturally presupposes also the previous physics that have given rise to quantum physics.
This sort of presupposing the specific science itself for defining its foundational concepts is what happens when concepts from within the specific science, and not clearly physical-ontological notions, come into play in the foundations of the science. Space and time are measuremental, hence cognitive and epistemic. These are not physical-ontological notions. Hence, these cannot be at the foundations of physics or of any other science. These are derivative notions.
It is for this reason that I have posited Extension and Change as the primary foundational notions. As I have already shown in many of my previous papers and books, these two are the only two exhaustive implications of the concept of the To Be of Reality-in-total as the totality of whatever exists.
Relevant answer
Answer
Greetings and courtesy
Thank you for your attention, love and guidance
When we examine an event over time.
There is no crime, no specific location.
Like taking a photo with an open aperture camera.
We only see waves.
Graviton has a meaning over time, like the curvature of space and time.
Space and time are objects to identify our position. They do not exist in reality.
The truth is only in our mind. A set of pulses that are fired on a mathematical basis.
In your language (hello) is a different word in my language. But in terms of pulse and storage location in the brain, they are completely similar.
From our point of view, the world is not perfect. Because we are not perfect beings. Our only tool is mathematics, not physics.
Time must be removed from physics equations. The truth lies only in mathematics.
In the quantum world, there is no time for objects. What is the lifetime of an electron?
Of course, this view is only a point of view.
Forgive my boldness.
Yours sincerely
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
What are the bankruptcy cases of large social enterprises in the world?
1,Social, environmental, and management reasons for bankruptcy;
2,What is the future direction and current situation of these social entrepreneurs after bankruptcy of large social enterprises ?
3,After the bankruptcy of a social enterprise, how can the original social solution recipients (aid recipients) receive continuous assistance?!Which institutions will continue these assistance?
4,What is the difference between social enterprise bankruptcy and general enterprise bankruptcy??
5, Is social enterprise bankruptcy receiving high or low tolerance from society? Why?
Relevant answer
Answer
Okay
Question
11 answers
To explain the importance of moderation, the reasons for disagreement, and the difference between dilution and extremism in religion.
Relevant answer
It should be recognized that regardless of whether it is small or large is part of any relationship, and therefore it does not matter so much what the difference is but the way it is contained. And then bypassing the idea of ​​the party being wrong and moving to the idea of ​​learning from the goal and creating a new concept that combines disparate rules and values ​​fairly.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
5 answers
Why climates are colder at the poles and warmer at the equator and reason equatorial ocean water is warmer than polar ocean water?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Ibrahim Sufiyan thank you for your contribution to the discussion
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
Why do larger molecules have stronger intermolecular forces and intermolecular forces of attraction is the reason why water cannot evaporate quickly?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Murtadha Shukur thank you for your contribution to the discussion
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
6 answers
Recently, I setup an MFC experiment, and the OCV fell to zero after showing a certain value for 8 mins. Is it because of no biofilm formation? Thank you in advance for your answers.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Ms. Negin Naghibi for your answer. I shall ensure the efficiency of the PEM and electrodes, as well as their pretreatment methods.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
What is the reason that sodium reacts with water more vigorously than lithium and relationship between the intermolecular forces in a liquid and its vapor pressure?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Karthick Raj AG thank you for your contribution to the discussion
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
7 answers
In TGA analysis, 0.5 to 0.8% weight gain in case of plastic sample at initial temperature. please let me know the reason behind this if any one knows. Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Due to absorption of moisture or atmospheric gas(s), Oxidation.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
Generally in fracture test pre cracking takes some time which depends on materials but in my case the pre cracking of an Al alloy sample with square notch is completing very soon like in 10 minutes ,why its happening? Is this due to the square shape notch or any other reason?
Relevant answer
Answer
The square notch you mentioned might be providing a stress concentration that leads to accelerated crack propagation. If the square notch geometry creates a more severe stress concentration compared to other notch shapes, the crack might propagate more rapidly.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
8 answers
I have a query about the SEM images; when I analyzed them, they showed some cracks; I stuck to why it can be shown this, what is the reason behind it, and what is the chemistry behind it. I request everyone, please give me an answer as soon as possible; thank you for your attention.
Relevant answer
Answer
Your response 'Powders were placed onto the SEM stub after ensuring the samples were thoroughly dried' is confusing. I'm trying to figure out whether your difficulties lie in the starting material (is it a suspension or powder?) itself or the sample preparation for SEM. As others have indicated a drying stage (either prior to or during the evacuation stage in SEM) is likely be responsible. I agree with Vladimir Dusevich that 'Cracks are the least of your problems'. If you had a genuine 'nano' system (100% < 100 nm) and prepared the sample correctly then you should be able to observe separate, discrete, independent particles < 100 nm. At the least you would be showing an aggregation of such particles if this aggregation occurred in the sample preparation stage.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Greetings professors, students and those interested in mathematics. We know that according to a theorem in geometry, all straight line shapes can be converted into a triangle with the same area and equivalent to those shapes. The question I have today is whether there is a method by which any indirect shape of a geometric line can be converted into Convert another shape with the same amount of area? Is there a principle or theorem about this? Is this possible at all? If the answer is yes, has there ever been a way to answer this question? If it is impossible, what is the reason? moreThanks
Relevant answer
Answer
You mean a string with both ends tied up? Or a rubber band?
In the first case the perimeter is constant.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
6 answers
Men are certainly not offended by sex. It seems to me, that one way or another, the silent female population has its say.
The overwhelming majority of women answered that sex meant a great deal to them, and the reason almost always given was because it was a wonderful form of intimacy and closeness with another human being. (Shere Hite)
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree. Men are sexual. Women are emotional. That means that women are not aroused with a lover and not having orgasms. Hence why they are sexually passive and why we think that women should orgasm from the stimulation that men provide. But orgasm depends on the mental arousal of the person having the orgasm. Not their partner's arousal.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
Is it because it is considered to be due to genetic mutations and people think less can be done about it once it occurs and so they focus more on therapy interventions.
Relevant answer
Answer
"Genetic factors are estimated to contribute 40 to 80 percent of ASD risk. The risk from gene variants combined with environmental risk factors, such as parental age, birth complications, and others that have not been identified, determine an individual's risk of developing this complex condition"
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
What is the reason for adding an intron between homologous arms in the donor vector designed by crispr/cas9 gene editing knockout experiment? Why put the puro gene in the intron?
Relevant answer
Answer
Placing the puro (puromycin resistance) gene within the intron of the donor vector serves as a selectable marker for identifying successfully edited cells. The puro gene confers resistance to the antibiotic puromycin. After introducing the donor vector into target cells, you can apply puromycin selection. Only cells that have successfully integrated the donor template through HDR, along with the puro gene, will survive the selection process. This allows for the enrichment of cells with accurate gene edits and increases the likelihood of obtaining a homogeneous population of edited cells.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
Please help me.
In my result, in solar cell, when I increase the active layer thickness, Jsc was lowered (about half). However, EQE current was similar. Is there any opinion about this? (relating with low diffusion length of active layer, traps, low carrier density can be a reason... etc.)
Relevant answer
Answer
I also have a similar trouble/(ㄒoㄒ)/~~
Have you figure out why?
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
7 answers
Hi everyone
Its a small protein with 5.7kD weight. After doing weight adjustments considering acidic amino acids and also 3XFLAG tag, it should be 11.6 kD.
But on 16% tricine gel, it appears between 15kD and 25kD (almost 20kD).
What could be the reason?
I have checked it in cell extract and also after FLAG purification.
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Could it be glycosylated? If there is N-linked glycosylation, treating with PNGase F to remove it should result in the protein migrating at the expected mol. wt. for the polypeptide.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
Hello
Good time everyone
I ran the cloning product on a 1% gel and observed the following band. Can anyone tell me what is the reason why my band has widened?
Relevant answer
Answer
I disagree, the marker looks fine, the image just does not have a high resolution and therefore looks grainy. Yes, there are some smudges on the gel, but this - as we all know - sometimes happens. Just load less PCR product and you will see a sharper band.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
Kindly provide some references for the same. Thankyou
Relevant answer
Answer
Vivek Shukla, May be by the following reasons--
i) For the larger shift towards 2Theta is due to sample displacement.
ii) For the throughout constant 2Theta is a misalignment in the system.
iii) For the other cases, it is related to the sample 2Theta.
iv) For the shift towards right is due to expansion of the lattice. May by stress, substitution elements or non-stoichiometric phase.
v) The shift to right (higher 2Theta) shows lattice contraction, while a shift to left (low 2Theta) is due to the expansion in the lattice.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
I was working on a gene construct synthesized in pet29 vector as a clone. Primers were prepared and optimized with gene at Tm 58 degrees. Once primers were optimized, I carried out transformation in expression vector and checked colony PCR with the same set of primers. After some time, I needed to conduct PCR for the same gene again for TA cloning and repeated BL21 transformation but issues occured. My primers that were previously optimized didn't work on the same gene on the mentioned Tm. After numerous trouble-shootings, I decided to check either the problem has appeared in my gene construct or not. I checked my commercially synthesized cloned gene on agarose gel in the intact and digested form and there was no band of gene once visualized. Is there any chance that my clone is destroyed by nucleases? What can be the reason for such conditions? It will be a great help if you can guide me
Relevant answer
Answer
Ok so you digested the commercial vector with the gene in it. And ran it on a gel.
did you get a band showing the digestion worked? The undigested form is circular and will have multiple bands due to coiling. The digested form should have 2 bands, both different from the undigested, one showing the backbone and one showing the gene you cut out with the endonucleases. Or if you only used one enzyme, you will have one band in the digested lane.
If you used two nucleases and thus expect two bands after digestion, and got none, something went wrong with your loading of the gel or your digestion because there is no DNA. If you used two nucleases and got one band - and it is the expected size of the backbone minus the gene, but you have no gene band - this is unusual. It might mean that there was no insert in the backbone. So what you cut out with the nucleases is a very small segment of the multiple cloning site of an empty plasmid, and that segment has run all the way off the gel. OR it means that your plasmid was a mixture of empty backbone and the desired plasmid, the plasmid with the gene in it - and the proportion was something like 95% empty plasmid, 5% plasmid with gene, so the band for the gene is much more faint than the band for the backbone, and to see it you should use a GBOX and turn up the exposure.
Ok - when you first used this plasmid, you got it from a company, and do you just PCR the plasmid straight from the commercial tube to check the gene was there and then transfect cells and do colony PCR on those? and then just assume the plasmid was pure? or did you then do mini prep with a positive colony, and sequence the resultant plasmid, to make sure you have a pure stock?
Because if you did not do the mini prep and have just been using the original plasmid shipped to you, it might be a mixture of empty backbone and desired plasmid.
im guessing you repeated the transformation the second time and did colony PCR and got nothing - might just be a bad transformation?
Did you then PCR the plasmid?
if you didn’t, do that. If you have a band, your transformation was bad.
if you did, which I assume you probably did, and got no band for your plasmid stock from the company, then what might’ve happened is
the plasmid you got was a mixture of empty backbone and plasmid with gene. When you did the first transformation, you got lucky and got a bunch of the plasmid with the gene in the portion of the stock you aliquoted for that.
now your stock has gone from 95% empty and 5% gene to 99% empty and 1% gene. So your chances of a good transformation are lower
Do your primers bind the backbone around the insert or do they bind the gene? If they bind the backbone, and you did this PCR on the plasmid stock and got no band, the empty vector is outcompeting the one with the gene. try turning up the exposure on the GBOX, you might have a faint gene band. Or it’s outcompeting it so much there is no band. You need primers that amplify only the gene to confirm some plasmids have it.
if the primers bind within the gene and you’re getting nothing, your plasmid stock is a bunch of empty vector.
I recommend, if it turns out the stock is a mixture, you do a transformation and do mini prep to get a pure stock.
It will be ok. Best of luck. Cloning can be confusing. You’re going to figure it out and then you’ll be able to help the next person who has this problem.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Since I received the new orders of this nichrome wire sold by Phymep but fabricated by A-M Systems, it is totally impossible for me (and for others) to build the twisted electrodes as usual without them breaking all the time... Lateron, I learned that the reason was a change in their fabrication, and in particular the coating. Thus, I cannot use this new wire at all but need the same as before to build my electrodes. Would you know another company fabricating it ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Emma did you find a new provider, a replacement of the Nicrome wire?
I'm using the #761500 and the same that you described it happening to me.
thank you!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
Mechanism and structural changes....
Relevant answer
Answer
Decrease in moisture content and lipid modification that can be caused by heat.
I recommend article doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12456, there is more about crispness.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
What is the reason behind farmers using chemical fertilizers?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, Chemical fertilizers may have environment Effect. Excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural fields mainly leads to the degradation of soil quality. Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides introduce very harmful compounds into the environment, contaminating soil, air, surface and underground water. The chemicals do not evaporate easily so they remain in the water system eventually precipitating out as mud in the rivers. Thus, pollution is created. Fertilizers are rich in nitrogen and phosphorus which are source of nutrient pollution. When it's raining chemicals in the fertilizers are flew into water.
But chemical fertilizers are our compulsion because growing population increasing demand. The Nano fertilizers, bio fertilizers are the solution for that but it will take time. We have to increase their production.
Yes, Chemical fertilizers may have environment Effect. Excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural fields mainly leads to the degradation of soil quality. Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides introduce very harmful compounds into the environment, contaminating soil, air, surface and underground water. The chemicals do not evaporate easily so they remain in the water system eventually precipitating out as mud in the rivers. Thus, pollution is created. Fertilizers are rich in nitrogen and phosphorus which are source of nutrient pollution. When it's raining chemicals in the fertilizers are flew into water.
But chemical fertilizers are our compulsion because growing population increasing demand. The Nano fertilizers, bio fertilizers are the solution for that but it will take time. We have to increase their production.
_sg%5B0%5D=G1zfNNBbMHfQWZJoIWb04g0scmMxaKMtwCOei3ru42u8_q_5RCbS4m1RIb2BRC6Xa9DUaoDvdMzeQSsxJtEdU44BN34pnlJ1IrJkSehg.IKnc_6XgYdBHzd7QDVJKPjzkBCyi5O32VM51UrIfpSt77u5cz2V6qawj4Pl81NLQkUhn74vQ6KVJFDQCxRDbRA
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
Hello , After I have affinity (6x his pet24) purified protein from inclusion body using 50mM tris ph8 , 300mM Nacl , 250mM imidazole and 8M urea I have subjected it to dialysis in 50mM tris pH 7.6 and 150mM Nacl. Initially after 1 to 2 hours of dialysis at 4 degree C I saw some whitish precipitate in the bag. I took samples at 0hr ,1hr and 2hr post dialysis shown in the picture added below , there appears to be loss of or dilution of protein as in the picture added below. Protein is around 16.5kda
What can be the reason also what can I do to stop the same from happening? Kindly help
Relevant answer
Answer
The protein in 8M urea is most likely denatured. When the urea is removed quickly, the protein may aggregate and precipitate. This may be why your see a loss of protein.
The usual way to renature urea-denatured protein by dialysis is by a more gradual process, dialyzing against decreasing concentrations of urea in several steps. It is also helpful to keep the protein concentration as low as feasible to reduce aggregation.
It is unlikely that all of the protein will be recovered in soluble form even with the more gradual process, and some of the soluble protein that is recovered will probably be aggregated. The refolded, reconcentrated protein should be subjected to gel filtration chromatography or sucrose gradient centrifugation to purify the monomer (or physiologically relevant oligomer) from the aggregate.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
Name some citations as to why researchers used semi-structured interview
Relevant answer
Answer
A good textbook that covers semi-structured interviewing, is Rubin & Rubin, Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
I used to see my department work at ResearchGate but for some unknown reason I cant see them any more .
Relevant answer
Answer
thanks, Dr Ibrahim, but I still cant see my department work as I used to do
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
I want to understand the XRD characterization having different diffraction peaks of EDTA
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, Ms Rawat
You can see the following articles:
Study of optical and laser damage threshold in EDTA and DTPA-doped DAST single crystals
Graphene oxide and its nanocomposites with EDTA or chitosan induce apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer
Chitosan and EDTA conjugated graphene oxide antinematodes in Eggplant: Toward improving plant immune response
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
2 answers
The reason behind having the former is spoken and the latter is spelle.
Relevant answer
Answer
Length. "“UNESCO” is just too long to spell out each time: six syllables vs three syllables. "VIP" spelled out probably just stuck because it was already short enough. However, that's probably also for the better, since some people might pronounce "VIP" as "veep", which has a different meaning.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Why are journal impact factors reduced instead of remaining the same or increasing in 2022? What were the possible reasons?
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
Relevant answer
Answer
The impact factor is always calculated with respect to the previous two years, so if a journal has a "bad year" citationwise, the impact will resemble that.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Hello, I tried to prepare 10g/L MnCl2 solution but it got precipitated. What can be the possible reasons?
Relevant answer
Answer
One possibility is that it is MgCO3 that is being precipitated with the carbonate being supplied from CO2 in the air. Are you using distilled or tap water?
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Asking for clinical data or personal data without proper authorization is considered a punishable offence under the Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011, in India. Similarly, sharing clinical data or personal information without consent can also lead to legal consequences. The penalties for violations under these sections may include imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the nature and severity of the offence.
These actions pose significant risks as they may open the door to potential misuse of sensitive data, such as blackmail or other unlawful activities. Once involved in such data-sharing activities, individuals may find themselves inadvertently involved in further crimes, either as victims or perpetrators.
Being cautious and mindful of data privacy and legal regulations is crucial. Unauthorized data sharing can have severe repercussions, both legally and ethically. Always seek consent and follow established guidelines when dealing with personal or clinical data to protect oneself and others from potential harm or involvement in criminal activities. Under the Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011, which fall under the Information Technology Act, 2000, the unauthorized collection, use, or sharing of sensitive personal data or information is prohibited in India. Violating these rules can lead to legal consequences and specific actions related to personal data may be considered criminal offences.
The IT Act 2000 and its amendments in 2008 provide the legal framework for dealing with various cybercrimes, including offences related to the misuse of personal data. Some of the relevant sections of the IT Act that pertain to the handling of personal data include:
  1. Section 43A: This section deals with compensation for failure to protect data, where a company or person holding sensitive personal data is liable to pay damages if they fail to implement reasonable security measures and thereby cause wrongful loss or gain to any person.
  2. Section 66C: This section relates to identity theft and makes it a criminal offence to fraudulently or dishonestly use the electronic signature, password, or any other unique identification feature of any other person.
  3. Section 72A: This section deals with the disclosure of information in breach of a lawful contract, and it makes it a criminal offence to disclose, without consent, any personal information that is reasonably expected to be held in confidence.
It's important to note that the specific consequences and penalties for violating the IT Act can vary depending on the severity of the offence. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, or both.
To protect personal data and comply with the IT Act, individuals and organizations should take appropriate measures to safeguard sensitive information, seek explicit consent for data collection and use, and adhere to data protection and privacy guidelines.
Relevant answer
Answer
The Information Technology (IT) Act of 2000 was the governing law in India for electronic governance and cyber-related activities as of my most recent knowledge update in September 2021. The Information Technology Act was last revised in 2008, and no new IT Act was passed in 2011. As a result, the data I present here is based on the IT Act of 2000 and its revisions to the conclusion of the fiscal year in September 2021.
Unauthorized access, download, or publication of personal or clinical data may constitute cybercrimes under the IT Act of 2000. The following clauses of the IT Act address improper data handling:
Penalties for illegally accessing, downloading from, destroying, disrupting, or modifying computer systems, computer networks, or data are discussed in Section 43. A violation of this provision may have occurred if someone gained unauthorized access to protected health information or other personally identifiable information.
Computer crimes, including as hacking with the goal to cause unjust loss or damage to the public or any person, are addressed in Section 66. This provision may apply if there has been a breach of confidentiality involving sensitive medical or personal information.
Disclosure of information in violation of a legitimate contract is punishable under Section 72A. This clause establishes liability for the disclosure of protected health information or personally identifiable information in violation of a legitimate contract or agreement.
Penalties for disclosure of private information are discussed in Section 72 of this document. In their official function as a service provider or intermediary, anyone with access to personal or clinical data could be penalized under this provision if they disclosed such data without authorization.
It is important to remember, however, that the legitimacy of a request for medical or private information is conditional on the circumstances surrounding such inquiry. For treatment, study, or public health efforts, for instance, medical personnel or researchers may legally and ethically seek personal or clinical data from patients. In such a scenario, the data's privacy and confidentiality must be protected through the use of appropriate consent and protections.
More can be written/explained but because of space constraints i have written as much as possible.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
5 answers
Hi everyone
I inserted a restriction site (5 nucleotides) between RBS and the start codon (these 5 nucleotides are upstream of multiple cloning site).
after confirming my cloning, we started protein expression but our protein doesn't express.
after study of this problem, we understand we should not insert any nucleotide between the start codon and RBS (based on the vector datasheet).
Is really these 5 nucleotides affect on mRNA translocation or secondary structure and is this reason for the lack of protein expression?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi!
Making changes aruond RBS should be made with great caution.
What will affect:
1. SD-antiSD complementarity
2. SD-ATG distance (typically 5-7nt)
3. AT-rich site slightly upstream of RBS.
4. Sequence of spacer between RBS and ATG.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
State at least one reason for using digital twin
Relevant answer
Answer
Digital twin technology is becoming more widespread. According to Deloitte study, the global market for digital twins is expected to grow with 38% CAGR to reach $16 billion by 2023,
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
5 answers
Iam extracting protein from red seaweed using sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. I used different concentrations like 0.1M, 0.2M, 0.3M, 0.4M and 0.5M. After extracting protein, i found out that the protein% increased from 0.1M to 0.3M but it got reduced from 0.4M to 0.5M. What can be the reason behind this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Sirvan Abbasbeigi Thank you sir..
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
SNP are biallelic marker, give reason?
Relevant answer
Answer
in human there are 2 copies of chromosomes...
fred
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
4 answers
Is there a special reason, why the term "superficial cervical ansa" (Ansa cervicalis superficialis) was removed from official anatomical terminology?
Relevant answer
Answer
David J Daegling oddly it seems to be missing nearly all the sesamoid bones!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
I wanted to know whether the rapid evolution of the human brain (e.g. size increase, neocortex expansion, potentially certain genes that evolved, etc) is (or is a part of) the reason why us humans are the species most susceptible to Alzheimer's disease at the moment.
Relevant answer
Answer
Please go through the following articles discussing in detail how evolution lead to changes in cognition and memory.
Thanks,
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
older adukts reason for admisson
Relevant answer
Answer
Most older adults who have financial and social resources can avoid long term residential care for quite a while, while those without family or spouse support and with less ability to pay for in-home help may land in a nursing home sooner. Cognitive abilities factor largely - someone with physical frailty who is clear of mind can stay at home with supports much longer than someone who loses the ability to remember basic things and loses normal judgement about dangers, etc. Thus, various dementias are a huge reason that people need to be admitted to care facilities. Reasons for admission other than cognitive ones include falls and breaking bones, especially hips, but other bones as well, that suddenly render the person dependent on others for ADLs, or stroke, which likewise debilitates many older adults. And families which happily care for older people in their own home or the family's home can be challenged by incontinence in combination with frailty or with cognitive impairment. That often figures into a family's need to place someone. Finally, at the end of life, people at very advanced ages who have thus far been in fairly good shape cognitively and physically can become so frail and rather ill from old age (in the mid-90s or beyond) that a nursing home setting becomes a comfort to the person and any family for caring for that person's needs in the final months or weeks. Certainly, there will be research reporting particulars about these factors that can be searched. Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
From literature it is seen that piperine is soluble in ethanol,methanol,and acetone but practically this is not happening. What can be the reason?
Relevant answer
Answer
Noel W Davies In case piperine is in salt form then how to dissolve it?
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
10 answers
Problem-solving has caused confusion for grade 7 learners and irresolution in teachers for many years. Its rationalization, most of grade 7 learners have difficulties in reading and this is the main reason why the learners can’t comprehend and solve problems in Mathematics.
Relevant answer
Answer
Comprehension of what they are reading is a basic skill that needs to be taught from the beginning of the child's schooling. Lack of knowledge of the importance of reading has created a problem in understanding what they read. This has affected the learners' overall performance as they find it difficult to comprehend what they are learning in mathematics, science, and other subjects. As educators, we need to ensure that reading is taught to develop their listening skills, thinking skills, comprehension skills, and speaking skills and to apply the skills learned in their daily lives whenever they do mathematics, science, and social science or in form whenever they interact.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
Flourescent material
Relevant answer
Answer
In the IRF, the bump is common. These bumps are called afterpulses. The bumps are caused by regular photoelectrons that are scattered at the first dynode of a PMT or at the front face of the channel plate of an MCP PMT, and re-enter the amplification system with a delay of a few picoseconds or nanosec. The difference compared to true afterpulses is that such scattered photoelectrons are not related to a previously detected photon. They are thus recorded and, because they are delayed, cause said bumps in the IRF.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
1 answer
most of the time researchers perform the bivariate analysis of one dependent variable with several independent variables, and set the criteria at p value of 0.25 to retrieve a candidates variable for multivariable. is there a hard rule to set the p value? if yes what are the criterias?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Berhanu Negese Kebede. The bivariate (or univariable) screening you describe is not recommended, because it is known to produce over-fitted models. See Mike Babyak's nice 2004 article on over-fitting, for example. And see the datamethods.org checklist section on multivariable models. HTH.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
I installed a superdex 75 pg myself, and the conductance baseline was flat at the beginning of the balance, and then the baseline was flat when the sample was eluted to 50%, and the last 50% jittered up and down, which was unstable.
Relevant answer
Answer
Could be a bubble stuck in the conductivity meter.
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
6 answers
I have some nonlinear PDEs that I wish to solve numerically. My initial stab at the solution seems to be very naive. I discretised the PDE using finite differences, and this leaves me with a set of nonlinear algebraic equations at each time step. To my simplistic mind, I can solve these using the Newton-Raphson method.
I tried this method and I can't get the solution to converge for some reason. Was my idea wrong from the outset?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mat! I hope that all is well.
I use NR to solve sets of discretised nonlinear equations all the time. The first type of problem that I used the method on were nonsimilar boundary layer equations where I used the Keller-box method. More recently I've solved a set of equations for what are, in essence, Fourier coefficients. This system is very highly nonlinear.
In both cases (and others) the Jacobian matrix is computed within the code rather than specified by the programmer.
It may be necessary for some applications to solve each NR iteration using a block tridiagonal solver.
I don't mess around with Matlab for this. Good old-fashioned Fortran works very well for me.
I will say that, once you've cracked it you'll be dancing. So yes, persevere!
  • asked a question related to Reasoning
Question
3 answers
In my sample intensity decreases with increasing 2 theta angle? What may be the cause
Relevant answer