Science topic

REDD+ - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in REDD+, and find REDD+ experts.
Questions related to REDD+
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
2 answers
Livelihood improvements and provisions of alternatives
Relevant answer
Answer
yes
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
3 answers
“Emoción en la interacción digital: de los recursos lingüísticos a los emojis, memes y stickers”
Pedido de contribuciones
Envío de las propuestas: hasta el 15 de julio de 2019
Notificación de contribuciones aceptadas: 31 de octubre de 2019
La Revista de Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD) invita a investigadores que trabajen en lengua española a enviar manuscritos para su segundo número, cuyo tema central es “Emoción en la interacción digital: de los recursos lingüísticos a los emojis, memes y stickers”. El objetivo de este número especial es atender a diferentes recursos y estrategias que los usuarios emplean para canalizar la expresividad en las interacciones digitales (escritas y orales). Desde los primeros recursos textuales que se emplearon (abreviaciones, mayúsculas y minúsculas alternadas y otras estrategias de escritura creativa) a los diferentes recursos multimodales que las interfaces ofrecieron, los usuarios han desarrollado un repertorio de estrategias pragmáticas para canalizar sus intenciones comunicativas.
En este número se priorizarán los trabajos de alta calidad que describan y analicen algunas de las siguientes temáticas en relación a una o más plataformas (redes sociales, correo electrónico, etc.) y/o tipos textuales (textos breves, chats, post/comentarios, mensajería instantánea, etc.):
1. Evolución diacrónica de los recursos expresivos.
2. Usos y funciones de emojis, memes, stickers, videos, etc. en la interacción digital.
3. Recursos expresivos en la interacción digital oral (videos, videollamadas, audios).
Los artículos podrán ser tanto reflexiones teóricas como análisis empírico de un conjunto de datos. En el caso de que utilicen corpus, estos deberán ser recolectados bajo protocolos éticos que salvaguarden la identidad de los interlocutores. Por otro lado, y dado que el principal interés de REDD es la lengua española, se valorarán los artículos que atiendan a la riqueza y variación inter e intralingüística del español empleado en las interacciones digitales. Asimismo, se invita a todos los interesados publicar en la revista a enviar propuestas para el segundo número de contenido general. El plazo de recepción de aportaciones para REDD se encuentra abierto durante todo el año.
Indicaciones para enviar manuscritos
Los manuscritos deberán ser enviados por vía electrónica mediante el Portal de Revistas UVa (Universidad de Valladolid, España), en la siguiente dirección: https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/redd.
Los artículos tendrán una extensión máxima de 15.000 palabras (incluyendo tablas, gráficos, ilustraciones y bibliografía) y respetar las normas editoriales de la revista. Se deberá enviar maquetado en la plantilla de REDD. Todos los textos que cumplan estos requisitos serán revisados por pares ciegos. La decisión de publicación será comunicada a los autores en un plazo máximo de tres meses.
Para informaciones adicionales, enviar un correo electrónico a revista.discurso.digital@uva.es
Relevant answer
Answer
هل يمكن الحديث عن بناء نظام جديد للكتابة، فالامور التعبيرية العاطفية والنفسية والتفاعلية ناقصة جدا وفق ما تتضمنه منظومة علامات الترقيم العالمية . !
ألا يمكن أن نلاحظ أن علامة تعجب مزدوجة غير كافية للتعبير عن الصدمة!! وعلامات تعجب متتالية لا يمكنها التعبير عن الذهول!!!!!!!!
نحن بحاجة لنهضة كتابية رقمية وليس مجرد التعديل والترميم .
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
4 answers
STANDUP COMEDY
Standup Comedy has a long history. During the Renaissance, the royal jesters were chosen by the king, and he chose people who looked ridiculous; they had bug-eyes, and humped backs, and were short and often deformed. They word motley (mismatched) clothing, and they also wore caps and bells, and they carried fake scepters with heads on the ends of them so that they could talk to the scepters and not directly to the king. Because they were so mis-formed, they were considered not to be in competition with the king, and were therefore allowed to say things to the king that no one else would have been allowed to say. Some jesters spoke through scepters (made from pig bladders), as when today’s ventriloquists speak through their puppets. It was a way of “distancing” themselves from criticism. Even today’s standup comics speak into microphones, which at the same time empowers the comedian and distances the comedian from the audience.
Early on, comedians sought to identify themselves with ethnicities. These went way beyond African American, Hispanic, and Asian communities. Scotch, Welsh, German, Norwegian, Jewish, and Irish were all fodder for joking—both from inside and outside the groups. Still today we see comedians desperate to stand out from the crowd. “Hot topics” in the 1960s and 70s, were politics, race relations, and sex. Alan King, Danny Thomas, Don Rickles, Joan Rivers, and Jack Leonard became popular at nightclubs and resorts, while Woody Allen, Shelley Berman, Phyllis Diller, and Bob Newhart became famous on television. African American comedians Redd Foxx, George Kirby, Bill Cosby, and Dick Gregory developed white audiences. Lenny Bruce was known as ‘the’ obscene comic, while George Carlin was arrested in July of 1972 after performing his still famous “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.”
Alan King, Danny Thomas, Don Rickles, Joan Rivers, and Jack Leonard became popular at nightclubs and resorts, while Woody Allen, Shelley Berman, Phyllis Diller, and Bob Newhart became famous on television. African American comedians Redd Foxx, George Kirby, Bill Cosby, and Dick Gregory developed white audiences. Lenny Bruce was known as ‘the’ obscene comic, while George Carlin was arrested in July of 1972 after performing his still famous “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” In the 1980s and 1990s, stand-up expanded from nightclubs into major concerts with huge audiences. Bill Cosby and Steve Martin were “gentle” comedians, while Robin Williams was frenetic. Richard Pryor used an acerbic style, while Rodney Dangerfield and Buddy Hackett stuck with the old style, avoiding social satire. Saturday Night Live and The Tonight Show brought stand-up comedy to the whole country. One newspaper editor suggested that stand-up comedians were the new “heroes” in our society.
HBO was the first network to produce comedians without censoring them. This was partly because patrons paid for their services and so expected more. HBO produced 14 comedy specials starring George Carlin and his campaign against censorship. A new generation of comedians including Bill Burr, David Cross, Hannibal Buress, Chelsea Handler, Dave Foley, Todd Glass, Sara Silverman, and Demetri Martin do not have to worry about censorship of the kind that caused the Smothers Brothers to lose their show because of mildly criticizing the Vietnam war, or caused Jack Paar to walk off his show to protest his network’s censoring of an old British story about a confusion over whether W.C. stood for Wayside Chapel or Water Closet.
Bob Hope, Jack Benny, George Burns, Fred Allen, Milton Berle, Henny Youngman, Alan King, and Frank Fay are said to exemplify a pure form of stand-up comedy. They stood before an audience and managed to develop the kind of rapport that allowed them to speak—and laugh—with strangers who had suddenly become “friends.” Their performance comedy is more theatrical, more scripted, more elaborate, and more fully developed. Performers use costumes, props, and stage settings as do most of our contemporary late night TV hosts.
Don and Alleen Nilsen’s Humor PowerPoints:
Relevant answer
Answer
Stand-up comedy holds a unique position in shaping societal perspectives, often acting as a mirror that reflects and refracts the values of a culture. On the progressive front, comedians challenge societal norms, pushing boundaries and encouraging critical thinking. For instance, comedians like Hannah Gadsby with her special "Nanette" deconstruct traditional comedy structures, addressing issues like gender, sexuality, and mental health. By challenging conservative norms, Gadsby's comedy sparks conversations and fosters a more inclusive and open-minded society.
Conversely, stand-up comedy can also influence society in conservative directions by reinforcing existing stereotypes or maintaining the status quo. Some comedians rely on traditional tropes that may perpetuate harmful stereotypes, limiting social progress. For example, jokes that rely on outdated gender roles or racial stereotypes can inadvertently contribute to a conservative mindset, hindering the advancement of societal attitudes towards equality.
Moreover, stand-up comedy has the power to unify disparate voices through shared laughter. Comedians like Hasan Minhaj use humor to bridge cultural gaps, offering a progressive perspective on diversity and immigration. Minhaj's comedy not only challenges conservative views but also fosters understanding and empathy, promoting a more interconnected and tolerant society.
Yet, comedy can also be a double-edged sword, as it may inadvertently reinforce echo chambers. Some comedians cater exclusively to like-minded audiences, creating an environment that stifles diverse perspectives. This can lead to a conservative reinforcement, where individuals are less exposed to alternative viewpoints and less willing to engage with progressive ideas.
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
2 answers
Standup Comedy has a long history. During the Renaissance, the royal jesters were chosen by the king, and he chose people who looked ridiculous; they had bug-eyes, and humped backs, and were short and often deformed. They word motley (mismatched) clothing, and they also wore caps and bells, and they carried fake scepters with heads on the ends of them so that they could talk to the scepters and not directly to the king. Because they were so mis-formed, they were considered not to be in competition with the king, and were therefore allowed to say things to the king that no one else would have been allowed to say. Some jesters spoke through scepters (made from pig bladders), as when today’s ventriloquists speak through their puppets. It was a way of “distancing” themselves from criticism. Even today’s standup comics speak into microphones, which at the same time empowers the comedian and distances the comedian from the audience.
Early on, comedians sought to identify themselves with ethnicities. These went way beyond African American, Hispanic, and Asian communities. Scotch, Welsh, German, Norwegian, Jewish, and Irish were all fodder for joking—both from inside and outside the groups. Still today we see comedians desperate to stand out from the crowd. “Hot topics” in the 1960s and 70s, were politics, race relations, and sex. Alan King, Danny Thomas, Don Rickles, Joan Rivers, and Jack Leonard became popular at nightclubs and resorts, while Woody Allen, Shelley Berman, Phyllis Diller, and Bob Newhart became famous on television. African American comedians Redd Foxx, George Kirby, Bill Cosby, and Dick Gregory developed white audiences. Lenny Bruce was known as ‘the’ obscene comic, while George Carlin was arrested in July of 1972 after performing his still famous “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.”
Alan King, Danny Thomas, Don Rickles, Joan Rivers, and Jack Leonard became popular at nightclubs and resorts, while Woody Allen, Shelley Berman, Phyllis Diller, and Bob Newhart became famous on television. African American comedians Redd Foxx, George Kirby, Bill Cosby, and Dick Gregory developed white audiences. Lenny Bruce was known as ‘the’ obscene comic, while George Carlin was arrested in July of 1972 after performing his still famous “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” In the 1980s and 1990s, stand-up expanded from nightclubs into major concerts with huge audiences. Bill Cosby and Steve Martin were “gentle” comedians, while Robin Williams was frenetic. Richard Pryor used an acerbic style, while Rodney Dangerfield and Buddy Hackett stuck with the old style, avoiding social satire. Saturday Night Live and The Tonight Show brought stand-up comedy to the whole country. One newspaper editor suggested that stand-up comedians were the new “heroes” in our society.
HBO was the first network to produce comedians without censoring them. This was partly because patrons paid for their services and so expected more. HBO produced 14 comedy specials starring George Carlin and his campaign against censorship. A new generation of comedians including Bill Burr, David Cross, Hannibal Buress, Chelsea Handler, Dave Foley, Todd Glass, Sara Silverman, and Demetri Martin do not have to worry about censorship of the kind that caused the Smothers Brothers to lose their show because of mildly criticizing the Vietnam war, or caused Jack Paar to walk off his show to protest his network’s censoring of an old British story about a confusion over whether W.C. stood for Wayside Chapel or Water Closet.
Bob Hope, Jack Benny, George Burns, Fred Allen, Milton Berle, Henny Youngman, Alan King, and Frank Fay are said to exemplify a pure form of stand-up comedy. They stood before an audience and managed to develop the kind of rapport that allowed them to speak—and laugh—with strangers who had suddenly become “friends.” Their performance comedy is more theatrical, more scripted, more elaborate, and more fully developed. Performers use costumes, props, and stage settings as do most of our contemporary late night TV hosts.
Relevant answer
Answer
Mini: Thanks for telling us about the Stand-Up Comedy in India. I'm glad to hear about 'Oru chiri Iru chiri Bumber chiri'.
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
3 answers
Seriously, REDD+ Strategy for forest carbon sequestration in India Himalayan region mark a new era for Himalayan ecological research by the pace of climate change? However, new suggestions by scientific research through multiple publication in IHR, Govt might boost the mitigation policies in the ground level? i think our community and politician aren’t convinced that a rapid climate crisis lies ahead
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Anil Kumar,
Yes, I fully agree with you. Soil carbon sequestration is the adoption of land management practices that increase the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the soil, stored as organic matter. Agricultural and forest management practices leading to increased soil carbon storage are counted among the best agricultural and forest management practices. The issue of increasing the scale of soil carbon sequestration is an important element both in restoring biodiverse forest ecosystems and in developing sustainable organic agriculture. The issue of increasing the scale of soil carbon sequestration to increase the amount of CO2 fixation in soil organic matter is an important factor in increasing soil fertility, counteracting soil aridity and is also an important factor in taking CO2 out of the atmosphere and therefore reducing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. It is therefore also an important factor in slowing down the rate of progressive global warming, adverse climate change and reducing the scale of future global climate catastrophe. It is therefore essential to continue research into the analysis of the determinants of soil carbon sequestration and to develop agro-technologies and forest management techniques that will increase the scale of soil carbon sequestration to maximise the fixation of CO2 from the atmosphere to organic matter.
Best regards,
Dariusz
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
I isolated DNA from freshly taken Human blood but during processing I was getting RBC contamination in pellet .I washed with RBC lysis buffer 6-7 times followed by centrifugation but still got reddness in pellet while the supernatant was clear. So please suggest how to avoid this next time without using any kit? and I want to use this DNA as unmethylated control for methylation specific PCR. SO will that RBC contamination effect my results. I took 2 ml of blood initially and used 3 volume i.e 6 ml RBC lysis buffer for removin RBCs.
Relevant answer
Answer
DNA is usually bound to proteins and all dna isolation methods are designed to remove protein so a little globin from lysed red cells will make no difference and you will get good quality dna, Some methods use proteinase K and others salting out or fractionation between aqueous and phenolic reagents. If you really want to get rid of the red cells they are quite fragile and white cells are very robust so you can add water to the cell pellet for 30 secs and then spin down and most of the rbc will have lysed.
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
7 answers
What if current practice of National Forest Inventory switches to National Tree Inventory, considering the importance of Trees outside forests and their impact on livelihood of local people and potential carbon trade? 
Relevant answer
Answer
I am retired from USFS. From my recollection, USFS leads the main national forest inventory in cooperation with state forestry, forest industry, other land management agencies, etc.  Long term plots are sampled and evaluated by FIA inventory, including national, state and private industry forest lands.  Beyond that, landowners and managers including urban areas may conduct inventories to suit there own needs.  Most of these inventories are not published, but may or may not be available.  Most inventories are designed to address forests or forest stands, as opposed to individual trees.  As needed, individual trees may get attention on an as needed basis, as appropriate in sampling of plots, and to some degree based on importance to landowner or public, in response to storm, fire or other damage, or in response to management plans.  I believe some of these data are applied to your questions on employment and carbon in various reports from managers, researchers and others.  
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
1 answer
What information should be included in a National REDD+ registry?.How should it interact with other databases like National Forest Monitoring System?
Relevant answer
Answer
Drivers of deforestation
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
1 answer
Computable General Equilibrium Model and Simulation.
Relevant answer
Answer
Although I am not familiar with the CGE Model, I recommend you use a land-use capability classification to define sustainable use categories based on a broad array of soil properties such as fertility, slope, depth, erosion susceptability, inter alia.  Categories should go from most intensive (e.g., annual crops) to least intensive (i.e., protection forests).
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
5 answers
I am try to develop a theoretical framework relating to the role played by state and non-state actors in the REDD+ and FLEGT-VPA processes.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
I do wish to be boastful, but I have developed exactly that framework, for evaluating quality of forest governance at any level, and any mechanism, related to state and non-state actors. You can find it it in my book "Quality and legitimacy of global governance: case lessons from forestry", and in more detail in my 2009 Doctoral Thesis
Cheers,
Tim
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
11 answers
Why has REDD+ (formerly known as Avoided Deforestation) come to occupy such a central position in climate change discourses recently. What has changed since it was first rejected in the KP/CDM era? Has those reasons cited for its rejection been addressed now? What is REDD+ really supposed to deliver. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Put it bluntly, there's money or financial incentive attached to it. Th only way by which the international community distract people poor nations from destroying the forest is to attract then some form of financial incentives, that is through the REDD/REDD+ scheme. 
My worry about this is that, the intended scheme is not actually benefiting those who need it. Major part of the fund is subsumed into the bureaucratic activities of the international consultants. I suppose the scheme should be planned sufficiently so that it can act as a form of long term development plan to upskill residents in rural communities so as to regenerate their degraded communities.  
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
10 answers
The accuracy of areas of peat fires are important component will be impact on the result of emission from peat fires. Most of the approaches used in the determination of peatfires areas based on burnt areas that derived from hotspot. The problem, burnt area just represent areas burnt scar in the above ground, we didn't know these of peat fire or no.
Relevant answer
Answer
Just using burnt area as measure of peat fire can be underestimation rather. Because, peat fires can be active for long time underneath. Peat fires are difficult to detect directly through remote sensing as there could be forest cover obscuring the direct detection as heat anomaly. The smoke product can be taken as surrogate to peat fire in such cases where direct detection of active fire is not possible. Burnt area can be used in cases where it suits anyway. Regards
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
6 answers
Storage of Carbon in biomass, dead organic matter, and soil carbon pools are one of the key supporting services provided by the forest.
Relevant answer
Answer
Lets have a browse at www.leafasia.org and look for guidelines to measure carbon pools. I used their method.
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
9 answers
We use a short range DIDSON in Redwood Cr, and a long range ARIS in the Mad R. Redd surveys are independently counted in Redwood Cr. To date (3 yrs of data), we are not seeing any agreement with sonar counts and redd counts for Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. The redd counts are negatively biased, even if you take into account that not all salmon passing the sonar beam will spawn (pre-spawn mortality). I know there is similar work on the Secesh R in Idaho, and I am wondering if any other place has a similar study going on and what their results might be.
Relevant answer
Answer
We contract annual redd surveys of spring Chinook salmon through Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. I PM'd you the POC as well as a DRAFT report. Typically to estimate the escapement for a reach the redd count is multiplied by 2.5. This conforms to the negative bias you are seeing. However, we don't have DIDSON monitoring, and instead use the video counts at barrier dams.
What is interesting is that the productivity and effective population size of fish transported above our projects can vary widely by watershed . We are monitoring this through parental based genetic studies. In one basin we transport over 500 adults yet the number of individuals contributing to the cohort for that brood year number lass than 100. This is likely due to a combination of PSM and losses during incubation. It is likely that the interbasin variation is likely due to the hydrological and geological differences. Our lowest performing subbasin has the combination of large floods during incubation, combined with a river channel that has a lot of bedrock.
We also have done a lot of investigations into pre-spawn mortality which I can provide if it would be useful.
v/r,
Griff
  • asked a question related to REDD+
Question
2 answers
I am exploring calculations of NPP using different approaches and read about this model, but I've been unable to find it.
Relevant answer
thanks a lot Tim. I will try to contact Frank