Publishing - Science topic

The only confirmed theory of gravity is the general theory of relativity. It is confirmed by the results of observations. In particular, it has been confirmed that our Universe is described by Riemannian space. It has disadvantages: there are non-physical features in the solutions.

It would seem that there is nothing more important than general relativity and that is what we need to deal with... BUT

A favorite subject of thousands of unscrupulous studies, “black holes” are just an extremely deep potential hole. Against this background, the only full-fledged theory of general relativity is something unnecessary and insignificant. A similar situation is in cosmology - hypotheses are introduced and non-existent objects are considered as real.

At the same time, research into general relativity is considered incorrect and rejected without explanation. This indicates, in particular, that the system of publishing and financing science has outlived its usefulness. The system has closed on itself.

New research is not taken seriously. Science officials act according to a rule that excludes everything new and incomprehensible. Everything is managed by “effective managers”. They will never allow a “patent office employee” into their business.

Meanwhile, there are works that make the part of science that imitates scientific activity useless.

Review paper publishing for pharmacological studies.

After my submission was rejected by a Springer journal, I recently received an email from someone called Avinash Dhangar, who claims to be a "Submission Editorial Advisor" at the Springer Nature Transfer Desk. He offer to help with some journal titles to resubmit to. Do you think this is reliable? How can I be sure that he really works for Springer? Thanks.

Most journals considered predatory are not really predatory. I have personally sent articles to check how they operate. They did plagiarism test and also reviewed the papers. Another aspect is that, they are fast and cheaper. They dysmystify the research publishing process. However, older publishers and their editors will not accept this truth because it represents a threat to their monopoly. They came up with all kinds of databases spreading scare among scholars not to publish or review for the new open access. The irony is that, the same people who accused the new publishers of not doing peer review are also telling academics not to act as editors or reviewers for such journals. Their aim is to kill competition and perpetuate monopoly. They conveniently forget the antitrust law, for those based here in USA. Institutions should award credit to those who work for open access journals as editors not minding whether they are indexed in one particular platform or not. Institutions should also take the issue of peer review seriously by awarding points for peer reviewing. If academics and professionals get fully involved in open access publishing, high quality knowledge will be available on the go, time for publishing will reduce and cost of publishing an article will be pushed down by competition. At the moment the old publishers who charge over 2000 dollars for their open access journals are the real predators. People living in Nigeria my country for example, have attained very high level of information technology such that many are on the internet 24/7. So why should a Nigerian scholar pay three times his monthly salary to get published when there are international publishers based on the country charging around 100 dollars. Is it not the same people who write and publish in the so called whitelisted journals that publish there? What is needed in Nigeria and India which already have the technology for publishing science digitally is for academics to get involved in the editorial process. This will make them know those publishers that are abiding by ethics and the headache of having to wait for six months for editorial decision only for your paper to be rejected will be solved. Also, before patronizing a publisher online check the age of the website. If it has existed for five years and its articles are clearly accessible without adverts and technical quits, then you have a guarantee that it's a journal that will not short down within a short period of time. Universities should help their research get visible globally online by acknowledging all journals being covered by Google Scholar and whose articles can be found on researchgate.net

The research shows that the development of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications, including the technology of the ChatGPT intelligent language model made available on the Internet, is currently proceeding at a much faster pace in terms of adapting legal norms to the new situation of rapidly developing new applications of this technology. In addition, the developing new applications of the artificial intelligence solutions available to Internet users generate not only positive aspects. For example, there are already numerous situations of disinformation on social media using photos, texts and videos generated by certain artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet. In addition to this, the possibility of generating the texts of articles and essays using the ChatGPT language model available on the Internet, which does not show data sources, source publications or bibliography footnotes, generates a serious problem of violation of basic copyright issues. In addition, the ChatGPT-generated texts do not contain information indicating whether they are entirely the product of artificial intelligence creativity or whether they are, however, texts produced by 'assembling' them by combining paragraphs and assignments borrowed from other Internet-accessible publications, articles, book texts, etc., which were added to the database used by ChatGPT in 2021 after being downloaded from the Internet. This problem could also apply to the many other artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet capable of generating images, videos, innovations, patents, computer software, new drugs, technical designs, artistic works, etc. It is therefore also necessary to build a digital labelling system for the various "works" created by artificial intelligence in order to distinguish them from what is directly created by humans. In addition to this, the improvement of such creative artificial intelligence systems should also address the issue of the automatic display of data sources, reference publications, annotated bibliographies and the elimination of the possibility of plagiarism in this way. It is also necessary to adapt the legal norms in the field of copyright law and, for example, also tax law relating to the issue of taxation of work carried out by artificial intelligence replacing humans in certain positions in companies and enterprises. In addition, other issues that require adaptation of legal norms to the current situation of different applications of artificial intelligence are how to solve the issue of authorship and gratification for "works" created by a robot or other machine equipped with an artificial intelligence system, when an intelligent robot has been produced by one company and another company has purchased it, and it is within the latter company that the AI-equipped robot has created certain "works" such as photographs, films, innovations, patents, computer software, new medicines, technical designs, artistic works, etc., which have been created by the robot. In view of the above, it is obvious that the development of artificial intelligence should develop in such a way that it does not get out of hand. This means, for example, that ChatGPT technology should be improved and legal norms regarding copyright should be amended so that the continued development of various solutions, generations, etc. of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications is not a problem for the development of science, scientific research, describing and publishing research results, etc., but only supports the development of science.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The provision of publishing of pre-prints with DOI is nothing but historic, giving whistleblowers the invaluable chance to correct the course of many-a-Titanic-like doomed scientific thrusts.

" Every research question has a different approach. True progress in science requires the ability to grapple with the immeasurable, the daring to view phenomenology differently, to give birth to and maintain a disquieting but penetrating dys-synchrony, to confront and not be overawed by history or consensus, to sustain searing self-criticism, and to carry curiosity and imagination to a defensible and generalizable conclusion." (Gupta, Functional Neurology, 2019)

13 SEP 2023

Dear Scholars,

I hope all of you are doing well. At present, we all are trying our level best to do research. I am facing publishing articles in Scopus Indexed for a huge publication cost. Is there anyone who can fund or arrange funds so that we can work together?

Thanks.

I have an article that aligns perfectly with the theme of a special issue in an open-access journal. Regrettably, I currently lack the necessary resources to complete it. Consequently, the article has remained unfinished and unsubmitted to the journal since 2022. I am actively seeking potential collaborators who have expertise in the area of our article and are willing to contribute to the manuscript's revision. Additionally, if possible, collaborators who can share in the publication fees. My primary goal is to find a knowledgeable collaborator who can enhance the quality of our work. Your guidance and suggestions are highly appreciated.

Hi, everyone!

I'm considering generating a DOI for my thesis, but I wondered if this would be a problem if I wanted to write a paper out of it.

Theoretically, the paper would not be exactly the same as my thesis, but it would be pretty similar.

Does it depend on the journal, or there is no problem whatsoever?

Publishing a paper

Hi All,

I’m often asked to suggest academic Design Journals, but find it hard to find a 'one-stop' list so researchers/ students can review and select. I’ve started a rough list in no particular order (link below). Any Design related journal suggestions would be welcome, from Innovation to engineering, education to ergonomics, UX to Design history, etc. Discipline-specific or Interdisciplinary.

Please offer some suggestions and Il add them to the list. Looking for quality, peer-reviewed offerings.

Thanks alot!

P.J.

May I know how to send my article for publication here or I'm I to send already published paper (as an attachment) to be uploaded here?

I needed to be properly guided on this.

Thank you

I am pleased to share with you a comprehensive list of esteemed book editorials for call for chapters from renowned publishers including Taylor and Francis, IGI Global, IET Press, Elsevier, De Gruyter, Wiley Scrivener, and Apple Academic Press. As an editor associated with these reputable publishers, with these books, I take great pride in curating impactful publications that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in various domains and audience. In addition to providing the list of editorial members who will oversee the development of each book project, I also include important information such as submission deadlines and manuscript submission links via email. Authors who submit their chapters will be entitled to receive a copy of the final hardbound publication which will be made available both online and offline in leading bookstores and university libraries. Please note that these editorial lists are dynamic entities that undergo regular updates. We strive for excellence throughout the entire publishing process by ensuring rigorous edits and modifications are made based on expert feedback received from reviewers. It is important to acknowledge that after chapter submissions have been collected for each book project – an update we promptly communicate with authors – it typically takes approximately three months for our dedicated team at the publishing houses to complete the editorial print process before circulation. This timeline accounts for necessary revisions and refinements required during production stages. We look forward to receiving your valuable contributions towards shaping these books into influential scholarly works within your respective fields. Together, let us embark on this journey of knowledge creation while upholding high standards of academic excellence and University faculties and researchers from different fields will be benefitted from publishing their chapters with the book editorials.

It is a question that I came across while reading answers to questions regarding expensive fees being charged to professional authors by global prominent publishers, in order, to get their manuscripts/articles/books/etc. published.

Hi there, I would like to publish my undergraduate research in relation to Attention Restoration Theory and Stress Reduction Theory. Where is the best place to get this published?

We submitted a manuscript to PLOS ONE and were accepted for publication on July 12, 2023. We paid the article processing charge a few days later, but the article has still not been published (after 40 days). A DOI has been generated but it leads nowhere (10.1371/journal.pone.0289151).

We have tried contacting PLOS ONE through multiple email addresses and have received no response. We also tried to call the phone number listed on our invoice to confirm payment, but were directed to an automated message that told us to send them an email. Due to 'high volume' they expected to get back to us in 7-10 business days.

Has anyone else had delays in publishing with PLOS lately?

I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Is the change due to complexity in finding a suitable reviewer? Or are they considering the paper not fit enough to be reviewed?

N.B. The average time taken by the journal to accept a paper is below 6 months.

In today's complex academic landscape, determining a good journal involves considering multiple factors that go beyond traditional metrics, particularly given the rise of predatory journals and the proliferation of questionable practices in publishing.

Are traditional metrics like Impact Factor still relevant indicators of a journal's quality? What other metrics could be considered? How do we distinguish the good from the not-so-bad journals? What criteria should guide our assessment? I believe these questions are even more demanding for young/early-career researchers.

What do you think?

Scopus free charge journals

l know it can vary depending on the specific journal and field of study. However, generally speaking, and in your opinion, what is the best time to submit a paper?

I am interested in publishing research on deep learning-based automatic speech recognition (ASR) for a specific low-resource language. What are the key areas or research gaps that I should focus on to contribute to this field? Are there any influential papers or research works that I should read to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state-of-the-art in this area? I would greatly appreciate any guidance or recommendations from experts in this field. Thank you in advance!

Can anyone help me find fast publishing scopus indexed journals in Computer science domain

What is your experience as the author of a research monograph or scholarly book published in the United Kingdom and of a similar publication in the United States?

If you had to choose between being the author of a book published in England or the author of a book published in the United States, which would you choose?

What are the advantages (or disadvantages) of publishing a book-length work in any nation with which you have had a pleasant (or unpleasant) experience?

Top 500” Nigerian Authors for year 2020-2023 in Nigeria as captured by SciVal (An instrument used by the publishing giant, Elsevier and the Times Higher Education to rank World Class Universities).

Can someone publish using research.

If yes, at what cost?

How long does it take before the article is available online?

Is there a journal that would publish study protocol for no or very small fee? We are doing national study but it would be nice to get a protocol out so we attract more collaborators. (Study is on nipple discharge and breast cancer)

British journals in my area of expertise do not conduct peer review processes! Articles are based on stolen and copied knowledge published in the name of people that have not researched the subject at all! Does the phenomenon have anything to do with the tendency of British culture to misappropriate the treasures of other cultures or does the British Academy fulfil its scientific role in this way (and we all have to reluctantly accept its hubris)?

AccScience Publishing

سلام،

أريد ارسال كتابي في ميكانيك الكم لنشره في احدى ور النشر باللغة العربية و التي تستعمل Latex

شكرا

Hi everybody, Salam

I want to send my book in quantum mechanics for publishing in one of the Arabic publishing houses that use LaTeX.

Thank you

Roger Blackwell, Ph. D. and Roger A. Bailey, Ph.D. Objective Prosperity: How Behavioral Economics Could Improve Outcomes for You, Your Business, and Your Nation. Rothstein Publishing, 2022.

I want to submit my work on "International Journal of Microbiology" (Hindawi)?

I am looking for documents relating to the permission of the US Office of Military Government in post-war Germany in 1946 to allow a single person to found a publishing house / media firm for special interest magazines, explaining why this person was allowed to open such a sensitive business. I thint that under record group number 260.4.4 Records of the Information Services Division it would be most likely to find such information, but I do not have any experience with such historical matters at all. Under the link https://catalog.archives.gov/search?q=*:*&f.recordGroupNumber=260&f.level=recordgroup&offset=0 I was not able to narrow my search to subgroups, so all results for record group 260 were displayed. Does anyone know how I am able to narrow my search to 260.4.4 and if there is any possibility to completely download a search result? So far I can only navigate through all jpegs of one search result.

If anyone has any other idea where to start my search I would be very thankful for any advice.

After devoting months to publishing my work, it is considered to be plagariazed as it was posted as a preprint in research gate. How can I get removal it from the database as it is showing similarities pleas!

The scientist tries to publish in high-ranked places but he is not always able to publish in other journals, which are low-scoring or without points. It depends on the field in which it operates scientifically, how many scientific journals are scored in a given field and what are the requirements and limitations.

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

I have been invited to join the editorial board of a journal called 'Arts & Communication', which appears on the website of ACCScience to be a newly launched publication. However, I have looked up some of the people on the editorial board - and some are very established scholars - but I cannot see mention anywhere of their involvement with 'Arts & Communication'. The invitation email looked genuine (none of the usual spelling errors, etc). If anyone can provide insight, I would be grateful.

I need to find out a publishing house to publish my academic book refers to literary research for free access to those who are interested in.

Any specific time schedule announced for publishing JCR 2023?

My colleagues have asked me about the potential benefits of publishing a book chapter through IntechOpen.

Can you provide me with your insights and thoughts on IntechOpen? I would greatly appreciate it.

They have messaged me thru may WhatsApp account and offered their services for publishing our paper in a Scopus-indexed journal. I am hesitant to accept their offer since I do not know how legit they are. What are your thoughts about this matter?

This is the site of Collins Publication:

Thank you!

Requirements:

high impact factor and high acceptance rate and none or low publishing fee

We see more and more articles co-authored with a long list of contributors. However, as it is common practice to list the contributions of each author, we see that some co-authors have minor contribution, like only editing the paper, a supervising role, or providing a piece of equipment for the experiment. For some scientist these type of articles with minor contributions constitute more than half of their total publications. Those scientists will publish over 20 articles every year, which seems impressive, but in reality, they only have a minor contribution on each of these articles when they have one. Indeed, it becomes common to see scientists having a friendly agreement with each other (I put you on my articles, if you put me on your articles).

This contributes to create inflated CVs that can be unfair when it comes to hiring a new faculty, promotion, or tenure acquisition. It also dilutes the real contribution of the authors that did most of the work.

Therefore, do you think Editors and journals should ask to drop co-authors that didn't contributed significantly to a study?

In today's fast-paced digital world, where information is just a click away, the fate of print journals hangs in the balance. Will they succumb to the overwhelming dominance of their digital counterparts, or will they carve out a unique space for themselves? Predicting the future of print journals in the next 10-20 years is no easy task, but one thing is certain: they are poised to undergo significant transformations. Let's delve into the possible trends and developments that lie ahead.

Introduction

The growth of digital content consumption has revolutionized the way we access information, posing both challenges and opportunities for print journals. While it's tempting to assume that print journals will fade away entirely, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced picture. In fact, the future of print journals is likely to be shaped by a combination of digital integration, multi-platform publishing, enhanced reader experiences, data-driven strategies, and a focus on differentiation. So, what might the landscape of print journals look like in the next 10-20 years? Let's explore the potential trends that could redefine the industry.

Digital Content Expansion

As digital reading and e-publishing continue to gain traction, it's inevitable that print journals will embrace the digital realm. Many journals have already started offering online editions or e-books, and this trend is expected to intensify. We can anticipate a significant shift towards digital formats, ensuring wider accessibility and reach for scholarly content.

Multi-platform Publishing

To engage a broader readership and diversify content delivery, print journals are likely to adopt multi-platform publishing strategies. From online websites and mobile applications to social media platforms, journals will leverage various channels to amplify their presence and attract a wider audience. This multi-platform approach will enable readers to access content in their preferred formats, enhancing convenience and engagement.

Enhanced Interactivity and Personalized Experiences

Digital platforms offer unparalleled opportunities for enhanced interactivity and personalized experiences. Journals may harness these features to increase reader participation and satisfaction. Imagine interactive charts, multimedia content, and personalized recommendations tailored to readers' interests. Such innovations will not only enrich the reading experience but also foster a stronger connection between readers and journals.

Data-driven Content and Distribution

In an era of abundant data, journals can leverage reader analytics and behavior patterns to gain valuable insights. This data-driven approach allows journals to understand readers' preferences with precision, delivering more relevant and customized content. Moreover, analyzing data can inform distribution strategies, ensuring content reaches the right audience through targeted channels and platforms.

Differentiation through Print

While digital advancements are undeniable, a segment of readers still cherishes the tactile experience of print journals. This emotional and aesthetic attachment creates an opportunity for print journals to differentiate themselves. By offering high-quality print editions, unique designs, or collectible value, some journals can cater to specific readers' desires, providing a distinct experience that complements digital counterparts.

Conclusion

The future of print journals in the next 10-20 years will undoubtedly witness a digital revolution, but it doesn't spell their complete demise. Instead, print journals will undergo a metamorphosis, embracing digital integration while seeking avenues for differentiation. They will leverage technology, data, and reader preferences to adapt and thrive in a changing landscape. The ultimate outcome will depend on the progress of technology, the evolving needs of readers, and the dynamic nature of the publishing industry. As we embark on this transformative journey, one thing is certain: print journals are resilient, and they will continue to find their place in the ever-evolving world of scholarly communication.

Dear All,

I want to know the fastest publishing journals especially from submission to the notification of acceptance in the electrical engineering field in the certified Scopus list and not be fully open access.

I am grateful in advance.

Dear Colleagues,

Peer-review isn't working well, and it needs an overhaul. In the time of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and remote work, it doesn't make sense to wait for months just to receive few lines rejecting an excellent manuscript or accepting a poor one!

Would you spend five minutes to answer a questionnaire on Google forms, and help SCIENEUM.io solve this problem for all of us?

This is it: https://forms.gle/2BskfDeAoeqKf5Wt5

Are you one of us? https://youtu.be/ewOuhohAjWc

Write your comment below!

Cosmetic science

Hello Fellow Researcher and acedmician,

I would like to know how to connect with well-known publishing house for book project. I would like to connect with fellow researcher or academia to start a book project if any like-minded is ready to begin. I am open to do it solely or jointly.

My area of interest is Advertising, Marketing, Branding and consumer behaviour.

Please do suggest or guide.

Thanks in advance.

#managementbook #bookproject #marketing

Are there any Scopus-indexed free journals (publishing free of cost) for Business Administration?

Dear colleagues.I'm looking for a medical journal publishing fast, not fake and indexed within Scopus. Any suggestions?

This seems to be an avoided topic. Many journals require some sort of fee to get published, even if not a predatory journal. This can be a barrier to people looking to publish earlier work without funding. It is even harder to publish review papers, as many journals want you to already be an expert in the topic rather than someone who is beginning their career chasing down and closing literature gaps. Are there any peer-reviewed journals that are willing to publish early career or student review papers without charging hundreds or thousands of $USD?

This topic has generated a lot discussion on the ethical implications of using language models like ChatGPT in academic settings. It drives us to consider potential biases, accuracy issues, and professionalism in academia while employing such technology. Furthermore, it encourages the investigation of alternate ways or complementary approaches that can improve academic success while resolving concerns about the incorporation of ChatGPT.

By considering the use of ChatGPT as a catalyst, and given the controversy surrounding their role, what are the potential benefits and drawbacks of introducing ChatGPT or similar language models into the academic product creation process? and does it assist the academic researcher in producing an efficient and engaging academic output, or does it cause the researcher to lose their ability to communicate ideas clearly and concisely and conveying arguments in a logical and convincing manner?

I want to know the fee required for publishing a original research paper. Thank you.

Why have I been making mistakes in submitting manuscripts to journals under the taylor & francis group recently ?

Do academic hiring committees consider book reviews?

I enjoy doing book reviews because I get free books, small publications, and it allows me to stay up to date on recent scholarship in my field. While I do not put all my publishing eggs in the book review basket, I generally always have at least one book review in progress on the backburner.

However, is it worth it for me as a PhD candidate to do book reviews if I want to apply for assistant professor positions? Are book reviews worthless in hiring decisions, even if they are in reputable journals in my fields of interest? One of my book reviews was peer-reviewed, does that make a difference? If I keep reviewing academic books, will it benefit my academic career?

I have heard mixed perspectives from academics. Some encourage students to publish book reviews since it's better than no publications at all and is perhaps a stepping stone to larger publications down the road, and others have said to just focus on publishing a few articles in top-tier journals.

As most of us know, the reviewer recognition website PUBLONS was taken over by CLARIVATE (Web of Science) last year and, a few months ago, Publons was merged with WoS., thus factually disappearing.

What do you think about this new scenario? Are we reviewers sufficiently recognized in WoS website? I personally loved the fresh, clear and dedicated webpages from Publons, and I don't think WoS communicates reviewer recognition as straight and clear as Publons did.

I would like to hear your opinions about this matter and about how to improve reviewer recognition in general. What can be done to improve the public recognition of our contribution to the publishing process? Every publisher says our hidden work is "crucial" to science communication, however I am not sure we are rewarded as we deserve...

I submitted a paper to a Scopus Q2 journal of Accounting. I checked the average time taken by the journal to reach decision before submitting the paper. 90% of the papers accepted are accepted within 7-9 months even if 6/7 revisions are done.

After I submitted the paper, it was not sent to reviewers for about 3/4 months. When the reviewers were assigned, they submitted review within a month. the Associate Editor (AE) however did not make any recommendation and send the paper back for three months. I sent 2 emails after waiting for 5/6 weeks; he never responded. I then emailed the EIC; he did not respond either.

I finally emailed the AE keeping someone from the publisher (Emerald Publishing) in the CC. The AE was notified by the publisher; AE got back to me immediately stating "3 months is not a long time. It is normal in academia to take 2 years to publish a paper". The AE forwarded reviewer comments within two days of such correspondence. The reviewers required effectively minor revision.

I submitted the revised paper one month after receiving the comments. Again this time, no reviewer was assigned for 2 months. When the paper was sent to reviewers, they reviewed within one month. Now, 2 months after the review has been completed, the AE is not forwarding reviewer comments. I emailed the AE, and the EIC. Again, they are not responding.

It has already been 14 months since I submitted the paper. Of this long time, it was held by the AE for more than 10 months. I have checked and found a writing by the AE in ResearchGate stating that he is quite engaged in some racial movement in his country. He was even in jail for some weeks.

Should I email the publisher again keeping the AE and EIC in the email cc? Actually the data used in the paper is getting outdated.

📷 Dear Fellow Scholars,

We all know the challenges and frustrations of the academic peer review process. As a part of the academic community ourselves, we are passionate about improving this process for everyone involved. At Harvard, we're working on an initiative to enhance academic publishing and we need your insights! 📷📷

We're conducting a brief survey to gather your experiences and expectations of the peer review process. Your input is essential in guiding the development of a platform aimed at making the peer review process more efficient and rewarding. 📷

Why your participation matters? 📷

You have an opportunity to influence the future of academic publishing.

The survey will take just 5 minutes of your time. 📷

Your unique perspective can contribute significantly to this transformative project. 📷

Are you ready to make a difference in the academic community? Join us by clicking here: https://harvard.az1.qualtrics.com/.../SV_5pcboFLSjNsNnNQ

Let's improve the peer review process together! If you find this initiative worthwhile, we encourage you to share it with your colleagues. Thank you!

#AcademicResearch #PeerReview #Publishing #ResearchCommunity #Survey #ImprovingTogether

Hi there,

I wanted to know what went wrong with this research paper. I worked with my professor on a paper for our course: Consumer Behaviour. But it faced a rejection. I wanted to know why it was rejected, so that I can improve my chances of publishing a paper in the future, since this would help me in securing a PhD admission as well. I would really appreciate it if someone can help me review this. I have attached the paper and the questionnaire.

Any help would be appreciated. I would help out as well in any way possible to the person helping me.

Questionnaire:

Regards,

Ehtesham

Publishing under a subscription with a high impact factor (3.0 and above) and Web of Science indexed (SCI/E) journal or Publishing in an open access and Web of Science indexed journal (SCI/E) with a low impact factor (below 3.0). If you were given these two options to choose from, which one will you opt for as an experienced researcher?

I have tried the free resolution software online and also Adobe Photoshop but just improving the dpi of raster images doesn't improve its quality and make it a vector image that is suitable for publications. I redesigned the figures and diagrams in adobe illustrator but I'm stuck with the output screenshots and python graphs.

citation needed

I want a help to know the free publishing Thomson and Scopus journals in the field of Information Sciences and Information Technology. or if there any websites that present this journals.

Some people publish their research papers in printed journals that are not available online and do not have accounts in scientific platforms such as ResearchGate, GoogleScholar, etc.

Does it look fine in the age of technology?

Do the Article Publishing Charge (APC) and Publication cost same ?

My first Edited book titled "Indian Tourism: Diaspora Perspective" by Emerald Publishing has been indexed in Scopus.

While I'm happy, I'm intrigued to know on what basis, the books are selected to be listed in Scopus. Likewise, some of my chapters contributed to Edited books under Springer, IGI Global and Emerald have been indexed in Scopus too, something that I had no idea when they got accepted and published.

So, if you can share your knowledge, it'll help me.

Recently, an editor from a publishing company called Eliva Press contacted me expressing interest in publishing a book featuring one or more of my written articles. They have informed me that there will be no fees associated with printing or distributing the book. I will receive royalties based on the number of copies sold.

Naturally, I had some reservations about this offer. The editor's LinkedIn profile and the publisher's website appear to be legitimate.

Therefore, I have some questions: Has anyone else here interacted with Eliva Press before, and the advantages of publishing with them?

Hello Dear colleagues,

I am looking for colleagues; Are there researchers looking for co-authorship in Language and Linguistics (or philology, or language education fields)?

Thank you

Does posting a bit more of what I already have on ResearchGate hurt or harm my chance to publish the book upon which it is based. And I mean publishing the final result of my investigation or of making it obvious?

Hello

Give me the names of publishing houses that publish literary novels, please.

If someone wants to publish his/her works, what is the impact if all the papers are submitted and published on a single journal sequentially? Why we change the journal once we choose it, provided that the topic of our study in lines with the journal's scope and the journal's reputability is of high standard?

There are a number of requirements for scientific promotion in each country, which are determined according to special laws or instructions

(Botany)