Questions related to Publications
Greetings, I am currently seeking individuals who share a mutual interest in engaging in collaborative endeavors aimed at producing peer-reviewed publications, thereby ensuring the maintenance of our research qualifications. I kindly inquire whether anyone possesses knowledge regarding the existence of such collectives or opportunities for scholarly collaboration. Additionally, I extend an invitation to those who may be inclined to participate in such endeavors to kindly initiate contact. Your insights and suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your contributions.
The Journal is SCOPUS INDEXED. Please help me with valid contact number and email id for such problem solution.
The score is supposed to measure the impact of research within the scientific community by combining reads, recommendations, and citations of one's publications. The score is meaningless without a mean or some information of the distribution of scores.
I have often wondered why agronomists, soil scientists and others who work on soil do not often mention the name of the soil they worked on in their publications, and wrote the following letter:
I would like to sincerely thank Editors of Geoderma for writing this editorial:
Recently someone was applying for a faculty position at a university and was asked to upload three of of his reprinted publications, which was strange to him.
1) There is no publications of mine in areas other than pure mathematics.
2) there is only 1 article of mine with P. Coulton: "Besicovitch triangles cover unit arcs"
published in 2006 by Geometric Dedicata
Given that secondary data are collected through annual reports, textbooks and other publications which are all past events. What is the need for "research questions" in a secondary data research paper?
my name is Susan M Gasser. For some reason there are two profiles in my name - one with most of my publications and citations and one with a few others. I want to merge them. One is using an out of date address and email (Friedrich Miecher Institute) and the right one is indicated: ISREC Foundation. Thanks for resolving this.
As is well known, Scopus and WoS, unlike many other bibliographic databases, offer very precise filtering functions. It may happen that a peer-reviewer asks to broaden the search to prove that there are no "relevant" publications in other databases. But, if you are researching a familiar field, you know that the interested research community is already structured around the most relevant publications (in terms of citations). Refining results from other databases such as ERIC, CiteSeerX, IEEE explore etc. can be very time consuming. How do you justify the final decision for a particular database over others?
There is a mistake in my name. Mike Carvalho is showing in several of my publications. My name is Miguel Carvalho (Author ID: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel-Carvalho-6).
I have requested authoship in some publications I was able to observe, but there may be others.
Thank you for helping in overcoming this sad situation.
I read from google that you can add your research work by going to the dropdown menu at the top right corner. however, there is no option to add papers. see attached file
The key question we have is the effect of dissolved oxygen, as a function of water depth, in paddy field water, which will facilitate the growth of the rice plant. Dissolved oxygen is directly related to Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP), and thus ORP will vary with depth of water in the field. We also know, that when ORP is negative, the carbon in the soil and ammonium in the fertilizers will form methane and nitrous oxide, both earth warming gases. It will allow arsenic in the soil to become mobile.
So by increasing the ORP in this paddy field water with infusion of ozone nanobubbles, we can get three benefits: mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide and prevent migration of arsenic and other heavy metals.
However, if we increase ORP to higher positive value, do we negatively impact the growth of the rice plant? This is the question we are trying to answer. Any publications on this would be greatly appreciated.
I would like to find the number of citations for a few particular papers and also list my publications in order of citation numbers.
I cannot see how to do that.
Is there a users' guide somewhere?
Are there any publications on the topological properties of nonstoichiometry loci - in general and, in particular, in intermetallic compounds?
I am doing a Ph.D. in Biotechnology. from Brandenburg University, Germany I have strong writing skills. I can be valuable addition in your team for pubications
I have seen endless publications that show that phosphorus has no spin-orbit coupling, although the peaks fit exactly that. Most of what I seen, for example, is 132.8 eV for P-C and 133.7 eV for phosphate. But it actually fits the 0.87 eV spin-orbit coupling.
Is there any reason that a P2p spectra won't show coupling??
What do people think about blind review vs. review internally to an editorial board (where the editors are experts)? I have heard that the former is considered a "superior" form of peer review, but that both are considered academic publications/journals and kinds of peer review. Is this true?
Note: I am a PhD student in theology, just in case field/background matters.
Hello, I made passivation on the Cu tape by just waiting in NaOH, it was necessary to coat it with a film of sulfuric acid and pyrrole monomer. But when an acidic polymer entered the solution, the passivation was gone, that is, it dissolved back. How should I passivation on a Cu tape or Al, in short, a metal surface so that I can produce polymers on it? Are there any publications you can recommend? Thank you
The world of hydrological monitoring is undergoing a groundbreaking transformation, thanks to the advent of disruptive innovations that are redefining the way we understand and manage water systems.
Within the IAHS MOXXI working group, we are embarking on an initiative to consolidate pivotal publications and online resources that pertain to hydrology observations and observational techniques. The preliminary compilation of chosen publications can be accessed on Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/groups/5146107/moxxi). We extend an open invitation to all to propose pertinent publications, contributing to the enrichment of our database with the latest strides in this dynamic field.
If you are interested in joining the WG, you can register at the following link: https://lnkd.in/dFJ-ivjF
Recently I came across an author with more than 150 publications in Q1 and Q2 journals to this date (Aug 22, 2023) starting Jan 01, 2023! How is that humanly possible?
AstraZeneca Covid19 jab, now largely withdrawn from use, contains Endotoxin from its production using HEK293 cells, growth medium and other additives. What measures have been taken to ensure that the most Lethal component of Endotoxin, Lipid A, is reliably measured? Are there publications dealing with the effect of Andenovirus or its fragments effect on the LAL tests? Does EDTA, Polysorbate 80, Sugar or Histidine interfere?
I am interested in only having one profile with all my publications and academic positions in one only profile. At the moment that are 3 profiles for me, each one has different publications (one of them have none) and different job descriptions (as I have changed posts). I would like to add everything in my most complete profile and delete the incomplete ones. How can I do that? (I might have passwords that I have forgotten and email addresses from previous posts that have been expired). Thank you!
Hello, I would like to update my profile with my publications, which I have stored in Zotero, with all the detailed information.
I am interested whether I could somehow automatically link/upload/update my stored papers from Zotero to ResearchGate? Maybe there exists some plugin?
Or must I update all the papers one by one manually?
Would it be possible for Research Gate personal page to place tabs to differentiate into folders such as "journal publications", "books/book chapters" and "conference papers"? It would be more practical than now that all the topics are followed according to the publication date and mixed up.
For example, none of my publications are on there anymore, I lost all citations and RG score. But the photo and title are correct. And my inbox is still full of inquiries. How do I get back the profile I built over 15 years?
International Journal of Physics Research and Applications (IJPRA) is an open access journal of Heighten Science Publications Inc (HSPI). The journal publishes significant and new papers in the form of Research, review, perspective, opinion and other different prevalent types of articles pertaining to the research done in different branches of physics. The journal is rigorously peer-reviewed by an international Board of scholars.
I have 2 researchgate accounts. I would like to delete one of them and combine all publications etc into one account only. Is that possible?
Hi folks, currently I got very unhappy with my reference system manager (Mendeley Reference Manager) . I cannot search for catchwords in the main-text of documents like in previous versions (likein 2018 or something). It only gives me back those publications that have those catchwords in the title.
So I downloaded older versions from the web (inofficial websites) but those downloads don't open after installing them....
Any ideas how to solve my problem? I would like to stay with a cost-free software.
I am looking for some funders / funding agencies who can support me with APC for my three research papers. Could anyone please help me how to find an organization or individual who can support me to pay/arrange for my publications.
If anyone can help me in this regard.
When I read publications devoted to the development of biomass equations, I find these three terms. While the first seems clear to me, the last two are incomprehensible to me. Sometimes I have the impression that the authors use them as synonyms, and others that they are completely different concepts. Please explain how I should understand these terms.
I would like to ask how systematic reviews/meta-analyses are considered in the academic world. Of course, they are not primary publications, but are they considered more than narrative reviews? That is, publication-wise, are systematic reviews considered a bit less than original data but more than narrative reviews -- thus paying back the additional work required to prepare a systematic analysis over narrative reviews? Thank you.
Where could be the best way to find publications of each nutrient or metabolic resource use each type of cancer to progress and the best way to block it?
example: methionine in AML
we are doing LC-MS/MS metabolomics and proteomics (research & diagnostics) and I wondered if you had experience with the Evoqua LaboStar PRO TWF water purification system?
It's a bit cheaper than the popular MilliQ (including the yearly budget for consumables).
I can find only very few publications referring to it for now.
My former e-mail was email@example.com, my more recent account (to be kept) which is updated in terms of professional status and publications is using firstname.lastname@example.org.
Where can I check the e-mail on each account to make I erase the right one?
Thanks for your help
Martine M. Savard
Today I came accross in ResearchGate with a paper written with ChatGPT and including fake references.
Do you think ResearchGate should provide us with a button/option to report this kind of papers? Or maybe we do have something like this already and I have missed it?
In an era in which means of communication have advanced, programs have become available for social contact, communications, and correspondence. Most of mankind's value and balance have been underestimated, as mankind no longer pays attention to what they write. As a result, the word has become worthless to most of them.
All books, publications, and resonant speeches indicate that the word is responsible from a religious and ideological viewpoint. On the other hand, no scientific or literary source has ever mentioned the responsibility of the word. Everyone who has talked about, written about, and searched for the responsibility of the word declares that its original owner is the one who is responsible.
Unfortunately, everyone who talks about the word makes grave mistakes as they attribute everything about the word to themselves.
Some claim that the word has acquired qualities, and these are great fallacies because the word has more than 50 self-creative and unique characteristics since the beginning of creation, and they will never change.
The intrinsic and inventive factors are called "innovative keys," which are for the thing itself without noticing something else with it or adding something else to it because they are observed in it by themselves without seeing something else added to it.
The keys are innovative, cognitive, applied, fixed, and unified. The word itself is innovative without dealing with something else associated with it.
In Unified word Engineering (UWE)
(１) The word is a self-contained thing. When you talk about the word, you assume it.
(２) The word has more than 50 creative, epistemological, and applied keys, including its responsibility.
(３) The word has more than 100 new cognitive pieces of information.
(４) The word has roles to play and determines its responsibilities according to the roles it plays in the scenarios.
(５) The word has attributes and functions.
(６) The word has responsibilities and defines the responsibility according to the role it plays in the scenario.
(７) The word has (1) a unique responsibility, (2) only one responsibility, (3) and is contextual for each scenario.
(８) The word has client collaboration (2 or more words) and acts as a server.
Next Editor's Letter will address
(a) The differences bewteen the word and the concept?
(b) The word Responsibility and Collaboration Model (UWC Model) and show examples of UWC Model with different scenarios.
have any researcher had a citation of one his research papers that was not counted in his citations countings?
how should such problematic be resolved
registred researchers in researchgate database, in addition to the platform's webmasters, are all welcome to give their opinion in this issue
Thank you all for your contribution
How can I edit incorrectly entered publication details on ResearchGate?
After a lay-off from keeping my publications entries up to date, I know I have made errors in recent listings. I would like to amend these entries.
someone else has accepted authorship of some works that are really mine, as I can prove, and I would like to retrieve them and add them to my list, but I don't know how to do it. I attach a screenshot of the person and my work.
Thank you ALL for your requests.
alas I am no longer able to make available my almost 100 publications. I am now Emeritus Professor, although I continue to published - 4 more this year, I I have no institutional backup or help.
Please reach me directly if you with to contact me.
All good wishes in your work.
I have some published papers and I need to know how could I promote these publications to get more reads, citations, and more reachability to readers
What are the main differences between publishing in high-scoring scientific journals and low-scoring or no points?
The scientist tries to publish in high-ranked places but he is not always able to publish in other journals, which are low-scoring or without points. It depends on the field in which it operates scientifically, how many scientific journals are scored in a given field and what are the requirements and limitations.
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
I seem to have two accounts. One of them using email address "email@example.com"(the main email address I use) and another one using the email address "firstname.lastname@example.org" (my generic institutional email address). This may be reason to the fact that the number of my publications in ResdearchGate is much less than the real number.
Can you fuse my accounts or can I do it myself?
Does anybody know or has ever contacted the "International journal of Innovative Research in Engineering" of the Fifth Dimension Research Publication (P) Ltd? Through Researchgate I recently came across a recent paper published in May 2023 in this journal, which is very similar (figures included!) to a paper previously published by myself and my research group in 2021 published in "Journal of Public Health Research"(doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.1993). I'm trying to write to the editor in chief, the editorial office and to members of the advisory editorial board to underline the similarities between the two publications, which need an urgent check, and my e-mails are blocked and never reach the recipients. Has anybody had a similar experience?
I have no explanation except that you are not picking up all my names on authored publications - ie A.P. Kershaw, A. Peter Kershaw, Peter Kershaw
I think many years ago I had two entries that could not be changed - I don't know why.
This situation is not particularly satisfactory for me especially as, otherwise, ResearchGate is very useful. .
The citation numbers of the author's publications are different for both; Research Gate and google scholar !! what are the reasons?
2 years ago I had a paper published in the TSI Journals publication Journal of Physics and Astronomy and I have been quoting it and referencing it ever since. Last week my paper seems to have completely disappeared from the journal issue in which it was published.
I have had no communications about this and urgent emails requesting information have all gone unanswered.
Has anyone else had similar problems with publications or is this a one off?
I have 22,000 carefully annotated references in Reference Manager v12 which has served me well in over 200 publications so far. Having upgraded to Office 365 I have discovered that the "Cite While You Write" function no longer works. Does anyone have a solution to this problem? Thompson Scientific and Microsoft do not appear to be interested in providing a solution. Do I have to return to an earleir version of Word?
PhD students should not be solely judged by the number of journal articles they have produced. While publications are a critical measure of a PhD's productivity and contribution to their field, they are not the only indicator of success or ability.
PhD students should be evaluated on the quality of their work, their critical thinking skills, their ability to solve problems, and their contribution to their discipline in general. These factors can be considered in evaluating their contributions, whether or not these contributions are made in the form of publications.
Additionally, many doctoral students face challenges such as funding, access to data, and time constraints that may limit their ability to produce journal articles. These limitations can result in the prioritization of other modes of scholarship such as conference opportunities, poster presentations, patent applications, data sharing, and policy briefs, which are equally valuable.
Ultimately, the doctoral process and its evaluation should be viewed as a holistic process with an emphasis on professional development, creation of new knowledge, and producing work of high quality across a range of relevant platforms.
The XBB.1.5*; an Omicron sub-variant, has a 41.57% prevalence (highest among the other variants), and the prior vaccination e.g., Oxford AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna etc. efficacy are being reviewed, while WHO noted it has the "highest immune escape to date." In Bangladesh, the percentage shift in confirmed cases during the last 28 days compared to the preceding 28 days, seems a major concern. #xbb15variant #wearmask https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p153 https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---25-may-2023
I have numerous publications which i find difficult to add each and every one of it. It would be easier if i could add from my co-authors list. Pl guide me how to do it
I need to vent my frustration! As the editor of a powerful and cost-free magazine for readers, I've been trying to bring researchers from other countries to share their ideas with us. Our magazine is a potent platform interested in circulating ideas from around the world within the Brazilian environment, and the best part is that we don't charge anything for its circulation. Unfortunately, many seem to ignore my messages, possibly due to those damn predatory journals out there, spamming our email inboxes without any quality criteria. It's incredibly frustrating. We need to value legitimate publications and promote quality academic dialogue. Any tips for fostering dialogue?
J'ai besoin de me confier sur ma frustration ! En tant que rédactrice en chef d'un puissant magazine gratuit pour les lecteurs, j'essaie d'amener des chercheurs d'autres pays à partager leurs idées avec nous. Notre magazine est une plateforme puissante intéressée par la circulation d'idées du monde entier dans l'environnement brésilien, et le meilleur dans tout cela, c'est que nous ne facturons rien pour sa diffusion. Malheureusement, beaucoup semblent ignorer mes messages, probablement à cause de ces maudites revues prédatrices qui pullulent, envoyant des messages dans nos boîtes e-mails sans aucun critère de qualité. Cela me rend très frustrée. Nous devons valoriser les publications légitimes et promouvoir un dialogue académique de qualité. Auriez-vous des conseils pour favoriser les échanges ?
I wonder how researchers get paid for their research or publications. I have not come across anyone who got paid for their publications. I need more light in this regard. Responses and enlightenment are welcome.
my greetings; I am looking for doctors who can publish in the MDPI publications for scientific cooperation. Thank you