Science topics: Political SciencePublic Policy
Science topic
Public Policy - Science topic
Public Policy are policy, politics and polity. Problems, actors, policy-making process.
Questions related to Public Policy
The theory examines the design, effectiveness, and impact of social protection programs on poverty reduction and income distribution.
In your opinion, how should a realistically pro-social, pro-family and pro-development socio-economic policy be conducted, i.e. that it is a realistically pro-social, pro-family and pro-development socio-economic policy and not a populist pseudo-economic policy, designed and constructed in such a way that it mainly helps to win successive parliamentary elections for the political party that introduced and implements this policy?
In the country where I operate in terms of socio-economic policy, the PIS government in 2016 introduced the Family 500 Plus programme, i.e. a social programme of financial support for raising children provided to parents or other legal guardians of the children being raised. Similar social programmes of financial support for the upbringing of children operate in highly developed countries in Europe. Thanks to the election promises, which also included the announcement of the introduction of this programme, the PIS party won the parliamentary elections in 2015 and then later also the next parliamentary elections in 2019. I researched this issue at the time and in the articles published at the time I pointed out the key issues that should be taken into account by the government in the introduction of this Family 500 Plus programme so that it is a key element of a real pro-social, pro-family and pro-development social and economic policy and not a populist pseudo-economic policy, including that the key strategic objectives should be achieved. Well, the key strategic objective of the introduction of this programme of social financial support for families bringing up children was to reduce the scale and slow down the progressive change in the demographic structure of society consisting in the successive and exceptionally rapid ageing of the population since the beginning of the 21st century. The effect of this programme was to be a significant increase in the fertility rate.
Unfortunately, this strategic goal has not been realised. In 2021-2022, the birth rate in Poland was the lowest since the end of the mid-20th century. Unfortunately, the Family 500 Plus programme was not implemented reliably, the government did not take into account the results of research conducted by independent economists in designing this programme and in its implementation. What I wrote about several years ago in the aforementioned articles was ignored. Unfortunately, instead of improving this programme, correcting the mistakes made, in May 2023, the government announced the continuation of this programme in the following years without any amendments, but with an increase in the amount paid per child per month from the existing and functioning for 7 years of the same amount of PLN 500 to PLN 800 from January 2024. On the other hand, the next parliamentary elections are to be held in October 2023, which the ruling PIS party is also planning to join. Therefore, in the opinion of citizens, it is obvious that this Family 500 Plus programme has become a programme of mainly populist pseudo-economic policy.
In view of the above, I would like to address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How, in your opinion, should a realistically pro-social, pro-family and pro-development socio-economic policy be conducted, i.e. that it is a realistically pro-social, pro-family and pro-development socio-economic policy and not a populist pseudo-economic policy, designed and constructed in such a way that it mainly helps to win successive parliamentary elections for the political party that introduced and implements this policy?
How should a real pro-social, pro-family and pro-development socio-economic policy be conducted?
What is your opinion on this issue?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
I will write more on this subject in my book, which I am currently writing. In this monograph, I will include the results of my ongoing research on this issue. I invite you to join me in scientific cooperation on this issue.
Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to discussions in scientific problems, and not on ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

É no contexto de uma população docente envelhecida e de uma camada jovem desinteressada pela profissão docente, que se prevê uma necessidade de recrutamento de professores, para a qual o nº de diplomados em cursos de formação de professores (CFP) não tem dado resposta.
- Qual é a imagem pública da profissão de docente aos olhos dos jovens?
- Os jovens consideram a profissão de docente uma profissão prestigiada?
- Porque motivos é que os jovens já não consideram a profissão de docente atrativa, enquanto opção de carreira profissional?
- Que motivações extrínsecas poderão ser alvo de políticas públicas que realmente valorizem a profissão docente?
I am conducting research for my doctoral dissertation on the effectiveness of the US federal government's National Strategy for Financial Literacy of 2006-2020 at improving Americans' financial literacy and well-being. My dissertation relies on secondary research methodology, primarily from political science/public policy. My academic background is in American Studies, so my research deals with the National Strategy as a US politics project, although I refer to previous research on financial education effectiveness in economics and other fields of study.
The world is currently facing numerous challenges such as climate change coupled with unpredictable rainfall patterns, population growth surpassing the available resources, increased social mobility, high poverty levels, widening gap of social and regional disparities and disease pandemics. Public policies that seek to address these challenges can only provide workable solutions if the decisions made by decision-makers are informed by well researched information.
Research publications are an indispensable way of communicating scientific findings to the world. It can inform policymaking that has the potential to transform lives for the better. However, most people view research as a gateway to achieving academic goals.
Researchers need to ensure their work has an impact on public policy by engaging policymakers at various stages during their research work, ensuring that their published work is simplified that even non academicians can understand and making the findings readily available in non-traditional research article types, such as newspapers and magazines
Furthermore as a researcher, you can improve the credibility to your findings by making your data readily available in various platforms e.g. in Figshare
I've been searching various A.I. projects and have found very little on the role A.I. can play in leadership and government. If we imagine a leader who cares about their constituency and does not have to spend time fundraising, most of that leader's time would be taken up by researching each decision with respect to what does the least harm or harms the fewest people and improves quality of life for the most people.
There are many subjects to study to approach the above idea. I'm not finding anything on it or any foundational research that could support A.I. leadership augmentation. Is this research someone is already doing? Where can I find papers on that?
The importance of the notion of public action. What are the changes or analytical contributions that the perspective of public policies understood as public action makes possible?
A importância da noção de ação pública. Quais são as alterações ou contributos analíticos que a perspetivação das políticas públicas entendidas como ação pública torna possível?
What is the current consensus among historians and other scholars? Apart from his alleged relationship with Mrs. Crawford that compromised his political career, did Dilke have other clandestine romantic liaisons?
In your opinion, can the framework we developed for solid waste management contribute to the elaboration of strategies involving public authorities and private companies?
Aiming to improve the framework developed in the article "Identification of the elements and systematization of the pillars of Solid Waste Management" called Stakeholder Interaction for SWM development, we would like to hear the opinions of the scientific community so that we can improve it in other publications.
For this, we will make a brief exposition of this concept:
We have created a theoretical framework with four pillars for solid waste management, to improve the systematization of the actions of public authorities and private initiatives, increasing the efficiency of waste treatment and disposal processes.
- Public Management and Public Policies are the exclusive responsibility of the public authorities.
- Environmental Solutions and TBL are the responsibility of the public and/or private sector.
- Public Management and Environmental Solutions interfere directly with waste management.
- Public Policies and TBL act indirectly in waste management.
If you are interested in looking at the concepts in more detail, go to: https://qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1717

In the situation whereby formulated policy is implemented without general acceptability by the citizens, what will be the outcome of such policy?
Do you agree that empowering women politically is one of the challenges that are interspersed with many difficulties in several aspects, the most important of which are the public policies adopted in community formation?
It is necessary to know the factibility of a theoretical model that is useful for constructing public policies
Does housing policy, including the policy of activating the development of the real estate market, housing, including the construction of new housing, housing estates, do you think is an important part of the socio-economic policy of the state?
Do you agree with me on the above matter?
In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:
Is housing policy an important segment of the state's social and economic policy?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development keynesian anti-crisis state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

Hello Friends,
I have two topics in the area of research, any suggestion or feedback with your thoughts will be appreciated to help drive the success of my Doctoral research thesis. Both topics are from my real-life experience and want to pursue research to find a solution and help society.
I have shared the following two topics with my guide / Mentor for review.
1. Public Policy in Healthcare Management for better healthcare services to people using Technology (AI/ML) - overhead of medical treatment cost due to unwanted repetition of diagnostics, which affects the social determinant of health (SDoH) in a low-income patient ( lack of value-based).
OR
2. Smart Virtual Platform using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Motor-function of Stroke Survivors (Social Determinant of Health) using gamification.
Keywords: AI / ML, Public Policy, Healthcare, Remote care, Diagnostic services, PHC, SDoH, Treatment Cost, economics, Law, Digital Health / Telehealth / eHealth, Virtual Assistant, Chat-bot
Thank you and really appreciate any suggestions and help.
I have an assignment on public policy and I have to use a country case study.
I am trying to craft my Master's Research Proposal And I am beginning to question how I can bag a cum laude for this degree.
Ongoing peer reviewed scientific research at the US state and federal levels has shown that US tobacco policy has never been punctuated as has been claimed in public policy-oriented punctuated equilibrium theory. Falsifiability is a key feature of scientific research including the testing of scientific current theories. When a current scientific theory is found to be false in whole or part, the proper protocol is to update the scientific theory or even replace it with a new scientific theory (subject to scientific testing). Has this happened in the case of punctuated equilibrium theory related to tobacco policy research and why or why not?
Can someone recommend a case study
empirical case study of the implementation of a public policy in the real world – and assess the obstacles and challenges to the delivery of that policy.
Thanks for your comments, but I have an assignment in choosing a public Policy Case Study
Welcoming suggestions Thanks.
I am looking for studies and articles that can shed light on the development of public policies for the conservation of historical heritage in cities and local communities. Contributions are most welcome.
Changes in social protection sphere are almost inevitable in many countries during and after Coronavirus crisis. What are they?
How should the systems of nature protection and biodiversity of natural ecosystems be dispersed in order to increase the effectiveness of these systems and reduce the scale of degradation of the natural environment?
What do you think should be improved in nature conservation systems and biodiversity of natural ecosystems in addition to just increasing financial outlays on nature conservation policies conducted by government agencies and ministries of the environment?
A significant part of financial expenditures of nature conservation and biodiversity policy is devoted to the promotion of nature protection and natural environment protection issues. However, the effectiveness of this type of promotional campaigns is low, because without applying legal restrictions, enterprises do not change their technologies to be more ecological if they do not see in this business realized in a short time. Even the occasional UN climate summits in which government representatives from the majority of countries take part do not cause significant real changes in the policy of nature protection and biodiversity? Usually, the largest industrial economies in the world do not sign the obligations of rapid reduction of greenhouse gases and the issue of increasing spending on environmental innovation in the energy sector. Why, despite the growing scale of public awareness, there is no significant improvement in the implementation of nature conservation and biodiversity policy, there are no real measures that would result in a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the slowing of the global warming process?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

In a situation of a balanced state budget, a low level of indebtedness of the state finances and current economic realities, can a large-scale state-supported housing policy and social policy be promoted and promoted on a large scale?
Does the housing policy based on the state-supported construction of affordable housing for citizens and the system of family-friendly benefits paid to raise fertility in society as part of social policy are good instruments for pro-development socio-economic policy? In a situation of well-managed public finance, in a situation of a balanced state budget, whether the low level of national finance debt can be developed on a large scale, the aforementioned housing policy and social policy? In a situation of well-managed state finance and current economic realities, can a large-scale state-supported housing policy and social policy be promoted on a large scale in order to improve housing and living conditions, raise the income and financial situation of citizens? Can this kind of pro-development social and economic policy be a good solution to the situation of a decline in economic activity and the cyclically slowdown of the country's economic growth?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development keynesian anti-crisis state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

What should be the economic policy for supporting the development of entrepreneurship and innovation?
Should an active, Keynesian and interventionist policy be used to increase spending from the state budget on the development of entrepreneurship support programs and innovativeness of business entities?
However, should neo-classical economics expenditures from the public finance system for programs supporting entrepreneurship and innovation of business entities be small, according to the concept in which the essence of entrepreneurship and innovation lies in its self-acting objective initiation, organization and development?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

What socio-economic policy is appropriate for reducing poverty and social exclusion in contemporary social market economies?
Please answer
Best wishes
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG,
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

Dear all, my name is Aricela , from Belize a developing country in Central America, I am a student at QMUL enrolled in the MSc International Public Policy. It's a pleasure for me to be here and learn from these discussions. It will help in my studies.
Suggestions are welcome and thank you.
In highly developed countries and economically fast developing countries there are analogous processes of changes in the demographic structure of society consisting in the aging of the population and the accompanying process of depopulation of cities, agglomeration, decreasing number of births, decreasing fertility rate in families. These processes, which are unfavorable for the economic development of the country, usually have at least several causes.
Extending the average life expectancy of citizens results from improved living standards, increased income and related improvements in quality of life, improvement of nutrition and improvement in the health care services sector. In addition, some of the lowly, educated people go to look for more interesting jobs and higher salaries by hiring in other countries. In a situation where young people paying off housing loans, are also burdened with various taxes, they are forced to work, to professional activity all adult members of the family of working age.
As a result, the pressure, the need to have more than 1 or 2 children are decreasing, and then the fertility decreases, which contributes to the decline in the number of citizens in the long term. In order to counteract this disadvantage for the national economy, this country should develop social policy to support young people, including subsidizing the purchase or rental of housing, establishing guaranteed income related to raising children, developing programs supporting the nursery, pre-school and education, pediatric health care system, etc.
Examples of such programs of active socio-economic policy are: Family 500 Plus Program and Flat Plus Program (Mieszkanie Plus Program). Because these programs have been developed only for 3 years, so you can not objectively assert how they affect the demographic structure of society, or motivate you to make decisions about having a larger number of children. In order to be able to answer this type of questions objectively, ie with regard to relevant scientific data, these Programs should be conducted with a minimum of 2-3 subsequent generations of citizens.
On the other hand, there has already been a noticeable increase in consumption for various types of goods purchased by citizens, which has a pro-development effect on the economy as it increases the level of economic growth. It may be one of the key elements of the socio-economic policy of anti-crisis, countercyclical importance, ie increasing the resilience of the domestic economy to global economic crises and the slowdown in global economy growth, e.g. the currently observed slowdown in global economy caused by the so-called war wars and other restrictions on the development of international trade.
In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:
How can changes in the demographic structure of society affect the economic development of the country?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

Recently, discussions have been held in the public debate on issues related to the development of the green economy concept, the need to introduce pro-ecological policy reforms, etc. to make it possible to achieve globally sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the perspective of the next years.
In the context of the problem of determining determinants of sustainable pro-ecological economic development, the following question also appears:
How should the new economy be developed in accordance with the green economy concept in the field of renewable energy development by means of which instruments and reforms of green energy policy, so that it is possible to achieve globally sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the perspective of the next years?
How effective green economy philosophy should be developed in a pro-environmental energy policy in order to solve key development problems of human civilization, ie environmental pollution, effective and quick to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and thus slow down the global warming process , activation of the development of electromobility, development of modern non-emitting harmful waste to the environment, renewable energy sources, development of organic agricultural production, development of biodegradable packaging production, etc. with the use of electricity produced from renewable energy sources?
Therefore, I am asking you the following questions:
How should pro-ecological energy policy be developed according to the green economy concept in the field of renewable energy development?
How should programs for the development of renewable energy sources be financed?
Should the state co-finance, within public-private partnerships with public funds, large investment projects for the construction of power plants producing electricity based on modern technologies of renewable energy sources?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Best wishes

Due to the crisis in 2008, this theme is no longer exclusive to the poorest or considered on stage in developing countries.
There are currents of thought that points out that the Government should not take care of social aspects, for claiming that things naturally settle. On the other hand, there are ways of thinking that the Government should focus on the social, and sometimes end up creating so many tools of "aid" that stifle the freedom to do business. What could be a fair approach?
What is your opinion about the impact of monetary policy on the stability of financial systems in the context of the analysis of the sources of the global financial crisis in 2008?
Please reply
Best wishes

I'm a Masters Public Policy student. The question is related to the course on Research Methods where we've been instructed to write a critical review of three articles that pertain to the main research question. In reviewing the three articles I selected, I note a few glaring gaps, which the authors themselves do not address. Therefore, my question is can I/should I cite other literature in order to back-up my observations of these gaps??
Thanks for any guidance.
Public policy is enacted with the vision to govern the particular sector fairly and achieve optimal social welfare. Is it possible to develop some holistic indicators that particularly identifies the impact of public policy in absolute as well as in relative terms?
What is your opinion to really measure the impact of public policy?
How do we detect whether there is an issue with policy provision(s) or implementation strategy?
How should the national, pro-development housing policy be shaped as one of the key factors of the state's economic development?
In my opinion, construction is such a booming and developing sector of the economy. However, in the context of the current processes of long-term business cycles, the slowdown in economic growth recorded since the end of 2018 in many countries and in the context of the state finances, the following are the current questions.
In my opinion, construction is the key pro-development sector of the economy, which also significantly affects the material situation of citizens. Housing and social policy are usually important elements of socio-economic policy, which significantly affect the standard of living of citizens. However, in the context of the current processes of long-term business cycles, the slowdown in economic growth recorded since the end of 2018 in many countries and in the context of the state of state finances, the following question is up-to-date:
In a situation of a balanced state budget, a low level of indebtedness of the state finances and current economic realities, can a large-scale state-supported housing policy and social policy be promoted and promoted on a large scale?
In connection with the above, the key questions are as follows:
- Is the housing policy based on the state-supported construction of affordable housing for citizens and the system of family-related benefits paid to raise fertility in society as part of social policy are good instruments for pro-development socio-economic policy?
- In a situation of well-managed public finance, in a situation of a balanced state budget, a low level of national finance debt, can the above-mentioned housing policy and social policy be developed on a large scale?
- In a situation of well-governed state finances and current economic realities, can a large-scale state-supported housing policy and social policy be promoted on a large scale in order to improve housing and living conditions, raise the income and financial situation of citizens?
- Can this kind of pro-development socio-economic policy be a good solution to the situation of a decline in economic activity and a cyclically slowdown in the country's economic growth?
- How should the national, pro-development housing policy be shaped as one of the key factors of the state's economic development?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development keynesian anti-crisis state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

Dear fellow researcher.
Please recommend reputed journals in Energy - focus subject areas on Renewable Energy policy, governance, technology management, energy economics. Preferably scopus indexed, and easy to publish. Thank you.
In many countries there have been terrorist attacks against civilians. These operations were carried out by people from different religions and countries. For example, what happened in England.
In your opinion, what are the causes of these terrorist operations and how are they addressed these operations and the elimination of the terrorist ideology and their leaders?
- In general, there are types of data that interact with different types of policies, for any thematic involved.
- It is important to identify the types of data that are transversal to the public policy evaluation steps, so that they can be reused several times.
Problem description:
In socio technical systems an idea of technological initiative can emerge and different groups can be organizing around it. Each groups little by litle are organizing sponaneously based on common interest, shared values including ethics, around of an idea of progress and potential benefits that sometimes is vague.
Sometimes those groups start to interact each other and at certain point of development a macro context start to be needed in order to reach the necessities of the society.
Lately despite of the potential social benefits of the new technological initiative, the political body do not create the institutional conditions for the development of a new regulation and public policy (this is what I call the macrosystem). So the socio-technological initiative do not thrive.
Some of the hypothesis about why this issue is happening are:
1) Politicians do not take care or interest of the posibilities of the new technology and initiative.
2) Politicians sees the new technology as a loss of self power threat.
3) Politicians want to take control of the different technical groups resources and assets but not the values and real purpose, because they want to have more power for themselves.
4)...
In consecuence the work done by different technical groups will never be enough organized and coordinated as well as is required by a common purpose that reach societal necesities.
What I want to do is describe the problem in terms of the interaction of technological working groups (the system) and the political and policy level (the macrosystem)
Do yo know if there are a systemic theoretical framework that can help me to analyse and describe this problem and dynamic?
In my opinion, the improvement of pro-development instruments of socio-economic policy is particularly important in a situation of a downturn in the economy.
Currently, this issue is particularly important in connection with the forecasted decline in the rate of economic growth in 2019.
In the context of the above issues, the following question is valid:
What pro-development instruments of socio-economic policy carried out according to the concept of Keynesian economics are currently the most effective in the area of economic growth as measured by, for example, the Gross Domestic Product index?
I invite you to the discussion
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

How can entrepreneurship and innovation be stimulated to develop in the framework of improvement of pro-development socio-economic policy?
What are the main barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country and what should be improved in pro-innovation economic policy?
What should be changed in economic policy to reduce barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation?
In many developed countries, the main barriers to innovation are high labor costs, high taxes and parapositive contributions under the public finance system.
Are these barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country similar or different?
Please reply
Best wishes

I am considering as research an estimate of the equilibrium between supply and demand of pedagogical training, considering how the government makes a decision to offer (or not) pedagogical training to teachers, and, concomitantly, how is the decision making of teachers in participate (or not) in pedagogical training. I thought about doing this using game theory, but I'm not sure what kind of model I should use, or what I should consider to determine that model. Has anyone worked with something similar and could give me any suggestions?
When I see government responses to crises such as the corona virus, I see a non-systematic response that in the end is more painful for the economy and society.
.
Other things being equal, If governments took proactive responsibility and had a policy of given every citizen a minimum income per months for three months to cover at least rent and basic needs so they stay home at the beginning of the outbreak when people are healthy, they would save money as the number of sick people and therefore, the healthcare cost would be minimal. Proactive responsibility brings social, economic and environmental stability increasing the sustainability of the system during the crisis.
.
But governments seems to love reactive responsibility causing unnecessary economic and social pain as more people get sick trying to make a living during the crisis and the health care cost goes to the maximum. This is happening all over the world right now.
.
Which leads to the theoretical question from the sustainability angle, Is Corona virus response a classic case of lack of proactive government responsibility? I think yes, what do you think?
The private sector offering services, private goods usually implements this process more economically in terms of costs and expectations of customers compared to the offer of the public sector. In order to increase this efficiency, creation and provision of public goods to consumers is often ordered by the state sector, ie by central state administration institutions and or by local government units and commissioned to be produced for private sector enterprises through organized tenders. These tenders are a kind of competitions, during which the best offers are selected, taking into account the criterion of economic effectiveness of the delivery of certain goods, costs and time of completion and the quality of delivered public goods. The investment programs of public-private partnerships are being developed in the scope of the creation and supply of public goods that require large financial outlays, such as in the situation of construction of large power plants, eg nuclear power plants.
In view of the above, the current question is: How to increase the efficiency of state delivery of public goods?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?
In the context of growing and increasing environmental pollution and declining areas of natural ecosystems, the importance and need to improve environmental protection systems, natural ecosystems and biodiversity is increasing. Biodiversity is one of the most important issues of natural ecosystems and life on Earth. Maintaining high biodiversity on Earth should be a challenge and one of the main goals of human functioning on the Earth in the 21st century and in subsequent centuries.
In connection with the above, protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable ecological development. In some countries, the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development is implemented successively, primarily in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques and recycling development. However, in many countries these issues are still insufficiently developed.
Still too small financial resources are allocated in many countries for the development of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation and recycling techniques. In addition to the private sector, besides enterprises implementing ecological innovations, it is necessary to increase expenditures and develop strategic pro-ecological reform projects, including restructuring of the mining industry of minerals supplying classic energy sources and development of energy based on renewable energy sources. This development should be supported and coordinated by environmentally friendly state intervention, and due to the high investment costs of construction of power plants producing electricity from renewable energy sources should be co-financed from the state public finance funds.
In this way, it will be possible to slow down the ongoing global warming process in the 21st century and thus slow down the process of devastating the natural environment, draining green areas characterized by high biodiversity. Biodiversity is a very important issue in the context of the analysis of ecology, sustainable development and the protection of the natural environment, including, in particular, the natural positions of biologically complex ecosystems, i.e. those that are characterized by high biodiversity. Maintaining biodiversity of natural ecosystems is one of the most important problems and tasks for people in the 21st century.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In the context of the above considerations, the following question is still valid:
How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

How measuring the effectiveness of public policies can increase results for society ...
What kind of scientific research dominate in the field of Socio-economic policy improving the economic, housing and social situation of citizens?
Please, provide your suggestions for a question, problem or research thesis in the issues: Socio-economic policy improving the economic, housing and social situation of citizens.
Please reply.
I invite you to the discussion
Best wishes

How can the effectiveness of the environmental policy of the state be increased in order to achieve sustainable ecological development based on the concept of green economy in the shortest possible time?
Please reply
Best wishes

In modern economies, various instruments of budgetary and fiscal policy are used, supporting the activities of business entities, and also instruments of socio-economic policy, including housing, etc., aimed at activating economic processes.
In view of the above, does Keynesian state interventionism mainly activate growth or economic development?
Please reply
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
_in_Poland
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
In 2020, there was an economic crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic and lockdowns imposed on various service industries. In order to mitigate the negative, recessionary effects of the pandemic, the so-called economic programs were used. Anti-crisis shields consisting in the applied large-scale public financial aid to commercial business entities. The issue of activating entrepreneurship as an important element of the anti-crisis socio-economic policy applied during the economic crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic in 2020 was described in my article published at the end of December 2021. I am providing a link to this article:
I invite all those who study this subject to research cooperation.
I invite everyone to the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz

The Earth is not sustainable. Population growth and consumption habits are the main causes. Discussed are ways to change consumption but not how to reduce it. Limiting consumption is uncomfortable but possibly necessary.
What disciplines, areas of contemporary economic systems, industries, etc. will in the 21st century develop the model of sustainable pro-ecological economic development according to the concept of green economy?
In connection with the progressing global warming and the increase in the risk and frequency of climate disasters, it is necessary to implement pro-ecological reforms as soon as possible into economic processes. First of all, renewable energy sources should be developed, replacing the classic energy based on the burning of minerals. In addition, it is necessary to improve the technology of automation and robotization in the processes of waste segregation, recycling and re-use of various types of raw materials. Also, electromobility, ecological agriculture, zero-energy construction, etc. should be developed.
In recent years ecological innovations have been created mainly in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, treatment of polluted water, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, energy-efficient construction, electromobility etc. However, more and more eco-innovations, new technological solutions, technical improvements which is part of sustainable ecological development, is also created in many other fields of science.
In view of the above, are examples of pro-ecological undertakings, technological improvements compatible with sustainable ecological development or ecological innovations that are also created in one of the following or other related fields of science, for example: Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Anthropology Theory, Medicine, Electrical Engineering , Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Business Administration, Risk Management, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Automation & Robotics, Climatology, Agriculture, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Intelligence, Artificial Neural Networks, Ecosystem Analysis, Power Engineering, Construction, Food production, Forest ecology, Biology, Geoscience, Government Programs, Behavioral Sciences, Biodiversity Assessment, Green Architecture, Greenhouse, Waste, Household Products, Information Society, Innovation Management, International Entrepreneurship, Internet Technologies, Knowledge Creation, Bioelectric Energy gy Sources, Business Model Innovation, Cataclysmic Variables, Chromatography, Clean Energy, Cleantech, Climate Prediction, Collaborative Innovation, Commercialization, Computational Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Conservation Biology, Consumer Behavior, Corporate Governance, Creative Economy, Crisis Communication, Cyber Security, Data Analysis, Database Administration, Development Cooperation, Digital Ecosystems, Economic Ecoindicators, Ecosystem Ecology, Energy Industry, Ecological Modeling Ecological Economics, Ecological Indicators, Discovery, Earth Sciences, Earthquake Forecasting and Geocataclysm, Econometric Analysis, Economic Integration, Economics of Innovation, Ecosystem Engineering, Electricity, Electronic Systems, Energetic Materials, Energy Technologies, Environment, Environmental Biodegradation, Flora, Food Consumption Life Sciences, Logistics Management, Materials for Sustainable Energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Nanomaterials, New Media Technology, Recycling, Physics of Global Warming, Plant Protection, Predicive Analytics, Production Planning, Project Development, Public Economics, Public Policy, Public Policy, Sociobiology, Space Science, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development Strategies, Technology Forecasting, Transport Economics, Water Resources, Weather Forecasting, Wildlife Conservation, World Economy, ...?
In view of the above, the current question is: What areas of knowledge will be involved in shaping sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?
Please, answer, comments.
I invite you to the discussion.
Best wishes

Has any of you studied the economic and financial situation, including the material and housing situation of households against the background of a specific socio-economic policy of the state?
If so, please comment on the results of the research or link to the publication in which the results of the research have been published.
What interventionist, pro-development instruments should be applied within the socio-economic policy of the state in order to improve the economic and financial standing of households?
Please reply

In terms of addressing the issue of social stratification and inequality in contemporary developing society, it is imperative to state facts in relation to the conceptualization of the growing challenge of inequality amidst pursuits to the reconstruction and development of society.
Hi all,
I am looking for papers/books/studies related to changes in public policy, including theoretical papers, and on the translation/implementation of global policy onto the national level. Any suggestions?
What instruments of state intervention are applied in your country as part of a pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy?
In some developing countries, pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policies and pro-social housing policies are currently underway, which are a significant determinant of high economic growth and provide citizens with material and economic well-being. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy.
The applied state intervention instruments also contribute to the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship, reduction of unemployment, investment growth, income and consumption. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used, including selected instruments of fiscal, budgetary and monetary policy, however, in a different structure of the use of individual instruments and a different share of their financing from the public finances of the state.
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What instruments of state intervention are applied in your country as part of a pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy?
Please reply
I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes

Olá,
Tenho interesse na temática deste projeto, sobretudo na abordagem das práticas do poder local em políticas públicas urbanas de segurança pública, fator imprescindível às sociedades democráticas.
A perspectiva de segurança adotada em meus estudos, rompe com a noção limitada e limitante de segurança como sinônimo de política penal e ação policial repressiva, dominante na sociedade e nos governos de um modo geral.
Na perspectiva que adotado, segurança envolve outros aspectos que vão além da proteção física e material e avança no campo da sustentabilidade ambiental urbana e do desenvolvimento humano.
Quem souber de sugestões de percursos teóricos e metodológicos que colaborem com essa lacuna de pesquisa, agradeço o compartilhamento comigo.
Grato,
Jovanil Oliveira
PPGPP - UECE
I need articles on public policies on improving the lives of the vulnerable groups by empowering/capacitating them to have businesses of their own. I am currently writing my dissertation incorporating the cooperative principles as an avenue to lift the VGs up.
Thank you very much.
Hi for all,
Excellent opportunity to submit research proposal about Digital Governance. New track about Digital Transformation in Subnational Governments led by me (Prof. Thiago Ávila) and Profª Drª Beatriz Lanza and Profª Drª Maria Alexandra Cunha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call for Papers/Proposals dg.o 2021: 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
Digital Innovations for Public Values: Inclusive Collaboration and Community
College of Public Affairs and Community Service, University of Nebraska at Omaha, June 9-11, 2021
Conference Website: http://dgsociety.org/dgo-2021/
Submissions: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=dgo2021
IMPORTANT DATES
- January 20, 2021: Papers, workshops, tutorials, and panels are due
- March 1, 2021: Application deadline for doctoral colloquium
- March 31, 2021: Author notifications (papers, workshops, tutorials, panels)
- April 1, 2021: Doctoral colloquium notification
- April 15, 2021: Posters and demo proposals due
- April 24, 2021: Poster/demo author notifications
- April 25, 2021: Final version of manuscripts due in EasyChair
- May 1, 2021: Early registration begins
- May 20, 2021: Early registration closes
TRACK 1. Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms for Future Governments
Track Chairs: Sehl Mellouli, Marijn Janssen, Adegboyega Ojo
TRACK 2. Social Media and Government
Track chairs: Andrea Kavanaugh, Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, and J. Ignacio Criado
TRACK 3. Digital Sovereignty in the Era of Smart Cities
Track chairs: Bettina Distel, Robert Krimmer, and Hendrik Scholta
TRACK 4. Opening Government: Open Data-driven Innovation and Collaboration for a better Public Value
Track chairs: Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti and Grace Walsh
TRACK 5. Security and AI Ethics for the Next Wave of Data-driven Society
Track chairs: Kwon Hun-Yeong, Kim Mi-Ryang, Ko Yoon-Seok
TRACK 6. Beyond Bureaucracy: Participatory Online Politics and the Future of E-democracy
Track chairs: Zach Bastick and Alois Paulin
TRACK 7. Inclusive and Resilient Smart Cities
Track chairs: Leonidas Anthopoulos, Dongwook Kim, and Soon Ae Chun
TRACK 8. Collaborative Intelligence: Humans, Crowds, and Machines
Track chairs: Helen K. Liu, Benjamin Clark, and Lisa Schmidthuber
TRACK 9. Digital Transformation in Subnational Governments (NEW TRACK)
Track chairs: Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza, Thiago José Tavares Ávila, and Maria Alexandra Cunha
TRACK 10. Organizational Factors, Adoption Issues and Digital Government Impacts
Track Chairs: Jing Zhang, Chris Hinnant, and Lei Zheng
TRACK 11. Cyber-physical Innovations for Public Policy and Service
Track chairs: Sukumar Ganapati, Michael Ahn, and Chengyu (Victor) Huang
TRACK 12. Automation of Public Services – Concepts, Practice, Implications and Emerging Perspectives
Track chairs: Ida Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen, and Ulf Melin
TRACK 13. Digital Government and Sustainable Development Goals
Track Chairs: Rony Medaglia and Gianluca Misuraca
TRACK 14. Blockchain-based applications for e-Government
Track Chairs: Jolien Ubacht, Svein Ølnes, Lemuria Carter, and Ramzi El-Haddadeh
TRACK 15. Legal Informatics
Track Chairs: Peter Parycek, Charalabidis Yannis, and Anna-Sophie Novak
The Digital Government Society (DGS) will hold the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research – dg.o 2021, with a special focus on the theme ” Digital Innovations for Public Values: Inclusive Collaboration and Community“. the Digital Governance and Analytics Lab, the School of Public Administration, the Center for Public Affairs Research, and the College of Public Affairs and Community Service, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska on June 9-11, 2021. The dg.o conferences are an established forum for presentation, discussion, and demonstration of interdisciplinary research on digital government, political participation, civic engagement, technology innovation, applications, and practice. Each year the conference brings together scholars recognized for the interdisciplinary and innovative nature of their work, their contributions to rigor of theory and relevance of practice, their focus on important and timely topics and the quality of their writing.
THEME & TRACK TOPICS:
The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2021) will feature the main theme of “Digital Innovations for Public Values: Inclusive Collaboration and Community.” Public values – such as efficiency, equity, transparency, privacy, security, trust, etc. — serve as the compass and goals for the development and implementation of digital innovations for public service. Recent developments in digital innovations — such as artificial intelligence, IoT, blockchain, social networking platforms, 5G, etc.— offer strategic opportunities for public value creation. These digital innovations are tools for us to solve monumental challenges facing our society such as pandemics, climate change, and sustainable development. More importantly, there is a return to focus on societal needs and values to guide digital innovations and to move away from technology push only for the sake of innovations.
Specifically, the conference aims to advance research and practice of public value creation via digital innovations by leveraging collaboration and community-oriented solutions in an inclusive manner. Collaboration can span the boundaries of individuals, organizations, sectors (public, private, and voluntary), and national borders in such forms as data and technology collaboratives, public-private partnership, and regional or global technology standards and policies. Communities can take on a virtual, physical, or blended form with a local, national, or global reach such as people’s local communities and our global community of the Digital Government Society (DGS). Community is also about taking a holistic (community-as-a-whole) approach to integrating digital innovations such as smart city and intelligent government. Inclusivity is about bridging socioeconomic and digital divides in governance such as inclusive civic engagement and e-participation. Inclusivity also entails openness, transparency, and leveraging digital means to engage community members for public value creation.
Submit your papers. We want to see you in dg.o 2021!!!
I do research on the relationships between universities and local governments by asking the research question (how) can universities contribute to the design (and implementation) of public policies at local level? With the help of a single case study (Warsaw – Poland) I want to provide evidence of the role of university stakeholders in the process of design and implementation of the current Warsaw Development Strategy (adopted in 2018) and contrast this with their role in the historical process of designing the previous strategy (adopted in 2005). The data for the study are drawn from semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in the process of design and implementation of both documents. In addition, the data collection combines secondary sources in the form of policy documents and reports of both City of Warsaw and HEIs in Warsaw.
I am not sure how to describe the method used for this purpose. It is a qualitative case study, but what about the perspective of investigating the phenomenon in two time-perspectives? It is not the longitudinal case study, because I’m not interviewing the same people many times (some of them took part in both processes and there the were asked about both processes).
The Center is now included as a lab under me. I would like it to be listed as a separate institution.
What is your opinion about the platforms for civic activity and their influence on the formation of Public Policies?
Can platforms provide a better urban environment?
My thesis title is- Enhancing Social Ecological Resilience of the fishing communities through Co-management- Hilsa fishery as a case study of Bangladesh.One of my aim is to find out the power relations or dynamics by using the political ecology as a framework to analyze power relations of different stakeholders.I am looking for articles or empirical research that analyzed power relation by using the Political ecology framework.Thanks for your help.
Sincerely-Mohammad