Program Analysis - Science topic

Well 😕, the work looks very academic if not "school-like". Every professional C++ programmer should know all the optimization techniques given and use them practically in everyday coding.

It would be useful to at least compare how much time each technique reduces when used together, and not just compare it to the obvious worst recursive case.

The function calculating the Fibonacci sequence does not give too many possibilities to show real differences, especially in terms of memory usage. These few necessary variables easily fit in the processor registers, which in itself means that any non-recursive algorithm will be many orders of magnitude faster than a recursive one.

I would suggest using some more demanding and really useful algorithm, for example from the field of neural networks.

The feasibility of this pseudocode depends on the biological and genetic processes involved. Each component should be clearly defined and scientifically validated. Epigenetics and genetic modifications are complex and can have unpredictable effects. Ensure that each element is practically achievable and their interactions are well understood.

Clinical judgment, which is the ability to notice, interpret, and respond to potential problems. In essence clinical judgement is most significant to Nursing Business. Despite this there are only concepts, of all the studies and literature reviews i have come across Non really confirms. I believe it (Developing tools for measuring clinical judgement) remains to be an Emerging Research area and Opportunity in Nursing as Health science.

Nice Dear Wiem Khlif

Ramprasad Joshi Here are few links where you can find different data sets for your study

https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/

https://github.com/nagdevAmruthnath/Predictive-Maintenance

We use Code Collaborator, by SmartBear Software. It presents the code diff to each reviewer and allows them to comment, accept, reject, etc. It is the only tool I am familiar with.

thanks

Hi

Make your conductor small enough that it must not be outside of defined port. Further

check boundry settings in CsT . Make them all to none.

It may work for you.

Many thanks Yasir. I will have a look at your papers.

I introduce a new way of slicing called "Clause Slicing". It will be nice to have a look at the paper and give me your opinion.

Best regards,

Mohammad

Dear Tanvir Hussain,

Please have a look at these useful PDF attachments.

Good luck

I have question what is the meaning of LBB in ASSEMBLY CODE generated with clnag

Dear Esteftah

The SAS Software is very good tool for statistical analysis but needs good training, so you can do your training with exercises in the following link:

The SPSS is simple and efficient software and need short training 

Good Luck

Dear Erick

You can go for ANOVA (Treat = 3; Replication = 20), as you would like to test three means. Based on the analysis of 20 observations for the three program, you can conclude the fastness of the program.

Regards

rajiv

First, if you are looking to publish, I suggest you get written permission from your legal department with a fixed length evaluation. My experience says that lawyers don't like public discussion of defects. This is why there are only positive case study results.

It appears that the technique focus on analyzing stochastic results; which is interesting. However, most programs do not produce stochastic results. Meaning that the general application of the concept may not be possible.

Count me ask skeptical, but interested. One question that was not addressed in the paper was training time. Also, you may want to look into Dynamic Slice.

The question is too abstract for me to understand what you want to do -- but if you would like to know and customize program slicing, in my opinion, you should try GrammaTech CodeSurfer first. Its academic license is free (an application is needed).

The tool enables you to slice C programs on GUI.  The tool also provides a Scheme interpreter that allows your script to access system/program dependence graphs of a program and compute a slice.   Hence, you can see actual slices on GUI and then start to write your own algorithm to do something using SDG-based slicing.

The „Scoping” is an important part of any DI-based framework. Scope is about managing the state of objects. And no need to explain why the State is important in applications. So every verification method for DI should aim „Scoping”. Maybe in mentioned paper the Scope is some kind of meta-condition?

Anyway, the scoping implies that the bean to be a context-sensitive type. Under these circumstances, I recommend papers like [1]. The paper targets verification of safety properties for functional programs. However, this paper can be useful to understand how to define a good verification strategy using a compositional technique. In the context of this approach, to handle cases such as scoping, many modules, etc, You should focus on the dependent types (with refinements). Good injections! :)

[1] He Zhu, Suresh Jagannathan, Compositional and Lightweight Dependent Type Inference for ML, Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (14th International Conference, VMCAI 2013, Rome, Italy, January 20-22, 2013. Proceedings), DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35873-9_19, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2013), pp 295-314

It is true that each software is a little bit orianted to a speciality (Adina : dynamic) (Abaqus : cevil engeneering) (Ansys : mecanics).

You need some one have been using them all to say which one could get your job easier.

Hey Peter, I will just describe my thought with the function below.

void foo(int x)

{

int y=3;

int p=x+y;

int z=y*3;

if(p==0)

z=y-1;

}

So the forward slices for input parameter x are as follows: (Please forgive me that I use the word forward again.)

int p=x+y;

if(p==0)

z=y-1

However, if we use taint analysis to track the impact of x, you will also find variable p needs to access the memory address of x. And since the value of p could determine the value of z, so z is also indirectly impact by x. So the results of taint analysis are similar with the above one.

I cannot tell the difference and when I should use taint analysis or I should use forward slicing. So would you please talk about their usage when doing program analysis? And it would be better if you have good papers that is related to them,

Prof.Peter T. Breuer, Thank you very much for your answer.

What I mean by control dependence between transitions is based on many articles like " Dependence Analysis in Reduction of Requirement Based Test Suites",

Control Dependence captures the notion that one node in program control graph may affect the execution of another node. This definition is extended on the above article to Extended Finite State Machine "EFSM".

Control dependence in EFSM exits between transitions and captures the notion that one transition may affect traversal of another transition.

The article states that control dependence between transitions is defined similarly as control dependence between nodes of program control graph, i.e, in terms of the concept of post-dominance.

Node Z post-dominates node Y iff Z is on every path from Y to the exit node.

However there is another type of dominance called pre-dominance

Node Z pre-dominates node Y iff Z is on every path from the initial node to Y.

Therefore, as I understand, post-dominance is on a relation with exit node wile pre-dominance is with initial node.

My question is " can we use pre-dominance instead of post-dominance in EFSM control dependency? If yes, what are the conditions for determining the control dependence between two transitions in EFSM". Thank you in advance.

There is a really good (and very straighforward book titled "Cost Effectiveness Analysis 2nd edition" by Henry Levin and Patrick J McEwan that answers a lot of those questions.

When I was still actively using C, I did use cflow for control flow analysis. It is useful for a coder in some cases. (There are also variants like bsdcflow, gnucflow.)

CodeViz looks good, but I have too limited experience, just tried it once. Also google for egypt and for CCTree, these are often named in relation to CFA.

I cannot help for data flow analysis.

By the way, I do not see any reason for connecting analysis to compilation. Control and data flow analyses a are just additional tools for a developer or an architect, in my opinion. What is your rationale for binding them together?

Good luck!

Have a look at the ProCos work from Tony Hoare in the early 90s. I cannot remember the precise details but the language mixed contracts with statements in a clear algebraic fashion, and was compiled by bootstrapping.

Are you logged into Win7 as an Administrator? This might be necessary.

You can google "cygwin1.dll installation troubleshooting" for many hints and tips.