Pollution - Science topic

What are the types of pollution?

Ocean pollution, including plastic pollution, is a serious problem that threatens marine ecosystems and human health worldwide. Millions of tonnes of plastic end up in the oceans every year, where it breaks down into microplastics that pollute the water, settle on the seabed and enter the food chain. Plastic threatens the lives of marine animals that mistake it for food, leading to death by suffocation, entanglement or damage to the digestive tract. Microplastics that enter the food chain can also end up in the human body, where they can cause health problems. In addition to plastic, the oceans are polluted with other substances such as heavy metals, pesticides and sewage, which also endanger marine ecosystems and human health. An effective solution to the problem of ocean pollution requires action on many levels, such as reducing plastic production, recycling plastic, cleaning up the oceans and promoting sustainable fishing. Scientific research plays an important role in solving this problem by providing the knowledge and analysis necessary to develop effective strategies.

I have described the key issues concerning the problem of the ongoing process of global warming, the negative effects of this process and, consequently, the need to increase the scale and speed up the process of the green transformation of the economy, climate protection, the biosphere and biodiversity of the planet in the following article:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

I invite you to scientific cooperation,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The answer to this question is linked to the third development thinking blunder since 1987 "the going circular economic thinking to solve critical socio-environmental sustainability problems with solutions that do not match the sustainability nature of the problem. Keep the history of sustainable development(1987 to now) and of dwarf green market development(2012 to now) in mind.

What do you think?

The question is: Was or is the inefficient use of resources the root-cause of the pollution production problem associated with the working of traditional economies?

If you think the answer is yes, then why you think so? and what is the implication if this?

If you think the answer is no, the why you think so? and the implications of this?

pollution exerts a multifaceted and detrimental impact on parasite communities within coastal ecosystems. By compromising host immune systems, disrupting host behaviors, degrading habitats, and directly affecting parasites, pollution disrupts the delicate balance of parasite-host interactions. This can lead to increased disease prevalence, loss of biodiversity, and significant economic repercussions for coastal communities reliant on fisheries and aquaculture.

Which emerging topics will dominate the field, and which traditional areas might see a decline in research interest?

Muñoz, Lucio, 2020. Sustainability thoughts 105: An overview of the externality structure of all possible markets and of the specific market illusion under which each of them operates, Boletin CEBEM-REDESMA, Año 14, No.6, November, La Paz, Bolivia.

Have you ever read this article related to solving the environmental sustainability problem?

Muñoz, Lucio, 2020. Sustainability thoughts 106: Can we solve an environmental sustainability problem by managing the consequences of that problem? If not, why not?, Boletin CEBEM-REDESMA, Año 14, No.5, May, La Paz, Bolivia.

algal genera and species

Has the World Health Organization defined foundations or criteria for determining visual pollution, or are there other international standards?

north carolina enviromental pollution 1982

How do fireworks pollute the atmosphere?

But still we are indirectly or directly doing the pollution. Please discuss for more awareness

In a world of environmentally dirty markets, how we treat the pollution problem determines the nature of each market and its structure, which raises the question: Can you see the similarities and differences between Pollution production markets, Pollution reduction markets, and Pollution management markets?

Think about it, what do you think?

International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (ISSN Online: 2328-7667, ISSN Print: 2328-7659) discusses technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, principles in the design of monitoring systems, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management and pollution risks.

Dear Professor/Researcher, I am pleased to inform you that we are currently editing a 6-volume book on Plant Genome Editing for potential publication by Springer. We aim to gather contributions from a diverse array of international authors, including esteemed scientists such as yourself. Given your expertise in the field, we invite you to submit a chapter on a topic from the provided list of titles or propose an alternative topic that aligns with the book's theme without duplicating existing titles. Please confirm your interest in participating within a week. Send a provisional title, a rough outline or abstract, and a list of potential co-authors after confirmation, as these details can be tentative at this stage. We eagerly await your confirmation email and, ultimately, your manuscript. Thank you very much for your interest in writing a book chapter for our book series Genome Editing for Sustainable Agriculture Book Series Volumes 1 through 11 (Springer)". The series consists of 11 volumes, and you are welcome to choose any of them to contribute a chapter. Please note that I have not yet updated the list. So you can select more than one chapter per volume. Volume 1 13Genome editing in plants via CRISPR/Cas9 21Plant Genome Editing examination of technological developments and difficulties 22Plant genome editing: Prospects, Progress, Implications, and Cautions 17Perspectives on social, ethical, policy, and governance issues for CRISPR-edited plants’ Volume 2 still has the following available chapters: 8  Plant genome editing without PAM by utilizing a CRISPR-SpRY toolkit 13 An extensible vector toolkit and parts library for advanced engineering of plant genomes Volume 3 still has the following available chapters: 6  Quantifying on and off-target plant genome editing 7   Quantitative assessment of genome editing 8 Deep learning improves the prediction of plant genome editing. 11  Plant breeding using orthogonal genome editing and transcriptional activation facilitated by CRISPR-Combo 16    Monitoring footprints CRISPR-mediated genome editing Volume 4 still has the following available chapters: 2   Genome editing translational research in plants 4 Genome editing patents worldwide 8 Genome editing in dicot: opportunities and challenges 14 Risk of off-target plant genome editing 15 Using CRISPR-TSKO technology for tissue specific Plant genome editing 19 Commercialization of technology for genome editing Plant Genome editing and future prospects of molecular marker Volume 5 still has the following available chapters: 7 Genome editing for toxicity 8 Genome editing for flooding 9 Genome editing for radiation 10  Genome editing for natural disaster Volume 6 still has the following available chapters: 7 Genome editing for toxicity 8 Genome editing for flooding 9 Genome editing for radiation 10 Genome editing for natural disaster Genome editing for pollution Kind regards Khaled

The Zarrouk culture-medium was used，and cultured in an outdoor openpond for about half a month, and the picture was taken under 400 times the lens.

l want to help reduce land pollution in urban areas in my city lagos , this may include waste products in sewages, gutters and land. I am looking at creating an automated robotic machine that could filter out waste in sewages or gutters, and pick up waste on urban roads and streets.

My Ph.D. research topic is microplastic pollution in soil Mobilization and immobilization I will study the effect of microplastic pollution in soil with PFAS, Are there any advanced and new methods for PFAS in Soil and plants besides GC Chromatography?

1) How do public perceptions vary regarding environmental impacts of face masks post-COVID-19?

2) What are the global geospatial patterns of facial mask-related pollution?

3) Should disposable face masks be included in Single-use Plastics Prohibition regulations?

Research topic is "Perceptions, Global Scope, and Criteria for the Control of Micro-Plastics Pollution from Disposable Face Masks"

The current trend appearing to have come from nowhere in 2024 promoting economic circularity to solve a sustainability problem embedded in it is mind boggling, which leads to the question: If a linearly polluting society is not sustainable, how can a circularity polluting society be sustainable?

Perhaps someone promoting economic circularity can explain

Note:

This question is academic, not political.

What simple ways do we humans pollute our vegetation without knowing? Just simple behavioural patterns that looks normal but when properly assessed actually harm plant biodiversity. Thanks.

What is the solar system like? And how does it work?

The building blocks of the Universe is a Panpsychist Quantum phenomenon. This unprecedented statement places us to where Quantum Mechanics become obsolete. To claim this spectacle of a statement, it would change our perception of an unintelligent mechanical universe to an evolutionary universe with a journey. This point of view would apply to every single element of our universe and suns cannot be an exception.

The knowledge that we have of our sun and its ingredients is all physical. We know our Sun has over 98% Hydrogen and Helium, but the Hydrogen and Helium that we know here on Earth cannot produce heat of millions of degrees, continuously, for billions of years. The reality is, the hydrogen that we know, cannot survive for a moment in such heat. Another question is the gravity of the sun. If the Sun has massive gravity, then why can it not hold the whole of its body at the same rate of velocity, because each section of its body rotates at many different speeds. Or, if it is the heaviest planet, then why is it made of the lightest elements known of the periodic table? The formation of a sun is another mystery and the rotation of planets in a plane is another big question mark. But by using the Panpsychist Quantum principles all these questions can be answered.

Key words: Sun-hydrogen, Sun formation, sun’s gravity, sun’s energy, planet rotation, sun rotation, quantum photon energy.

THE SUN

If we ask a toddler to draw a sun, he or she will draw a circle with some lines sticking out around the circle. The lines are representing the sunlight that is coming out of the sun and nothing is going in. This is the exact character of any sun; energy is coming out of the sun and nothing goes into the sun.

We ought to accept the fact that the Universe has been designed to create and survive the old-fashioned way, in a sense, we are duplicating the Universe. We are both made of the same chemical elements and each chemical element must have the same structure to follow, and that without temperature does not exist. Therefore, it brings us to the concept of creating life and supporting life.

To investigate the foundation of life (all species and vegetation), we would end up that life consists of a few atoms and molecules, and these atoms and molecules wouldn’t exist without temperature. The deeper explanation of life is the visibility of all mass conservation of energy. Simply nothing exists without temperature. The ‘life’ is started with a composite of the smallest complete entity unit of the universe, it is pronounced ATOM.

The chart of all the elements of the periodic table is hard evidence that each atom is presenting the exact character of that specific atom. Each atom is carrying its own mass, number of electron(s), size, color, taste, odor, the boiling/freeze point, chemical reaction, performing certain characteristic behavior, and each is holding specific information, and each has an evolutionary journey to create heavier atoms or molecules and ultimately life. Therefore, to achieve their consistency, they need environmental stability with some sort of support, nothing but right energy or temperature. Each atom conserves energy through nature where friction is no subject in an atom’s body. Simply, an atom does not work mechanically. This unprecedented statement discards Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentally.

As we know the strongest, smallest ancestor of every chemical element is the hydrogen atom, where each hydrogen atom is the composite of many unknown numbers of panpsychist quantum particles. Fortunately, we are aware of many types of isotope hydrogen. Yet the hydrogen that we know on earth has a natural journey to make heavier elements (PT). This hydrogen can not be in two places at the same time; therefore, it has the complementary partner to support its expedition. This duality exists in everything in the Universe.

SUN-HYDROGEN

Or

S-H

When and how is a Sun created?

We are going to determined how a sun appears in the Universe and how it is holding itself to survive for hundreds of billions of years with the harmony of the universe quantum nature concept. Suns are the only source of energy in a galaxy, in a sense, it is supporting life in the galaxy.

Sunlight or photons, the product of a sun, is mass-less and travel on a straight line; not forever, because, the nature of the space of the Universe is cold and absorbs energy as it is traveling. Therefore, the high frequency and short wavelength of the sunlight as it’s traveling, loses its energy in the course of billions of miles. The frequency and wavelength of sunlight is designed to support all its planets in its system; thus, finally it is exhausted on the rim of the galaxy. For the same reason the planets in the system are visible, and for the same reason each galaxy in the space of the universe is observed separately.

Suns are smart by nature. As the planets are circling a sun, the sun provides them energy. Sunlight’s duty is to carry and transfer photons (energy) from a sun to each of its planets by different wave lengths. Since it is mass-less it is not affected by anything, not even by the *gravity that most scientists think of; it is, however, affected by going through the long journey of cold space. The Sun is giving visibility and energy to all its surrounding planets, and for the same reason we are able to see and observe the most remote planets.

*See my Gravity is a Myth article or Gravity Is Internal.

But deep inside any sun there are tremendous functions at play that connect all the elements of the atoms in the Universe together, which is way beyond our imagination, because suns are creators of something that we never thought of before.

How much do we know scientifically about a sun? Or are the things that we think we know about the Sun true?

Well, there are some facts that no one can deny, such as: The Sun’s diameter is about 109 times bigger than the Earth and the rotation of the Sun is different from the Earth because it consists of more than 98% of the lightest known elements such as hydrogen and helium. It is like a large hot air balloon of light gas without the balloon itself. The surface of the Sun does not have a boundary; therefore, each part of the Sun has a different speed of rotation, due to its ingredient of a large fragile cloud of a light element.

For instance: the spot on the equator (the large circle) of the Sun, takes 24.47 Earth days to rotate once around or come to the same position; but as you go north or south from the equator, the rotation goes slower. The Sun’s South and North Poles take 38 days to rotate one cycle. These two speeds of rotation are telling us that the Sun does not have a solid body like the Earth, instead it is a hollow sphere with very light gas inside. So, the Sun’s skin is like a flaming ocean that at the equator runs faster than any other area of the Sun. These two speeds have been observed and measured, by an optical telescope, as sunspots that are moving across the Sun’s surface.

The Sun’s temperature varies in different sections; it can reach 6000 to 20,000 degrees centigrade on the surface depending on the region. The temperature of the outer surface of the Sun (corona) is about 1,000,000-2,000,000K, and some parts even go up to about 8,000,000K. This is all fact.

But, when it comes to when the Sun was created, how the Sun was born, what is inside the Sun, or how the sun is generating its energy with golden sunlight, then everything becomes speculation because no one knows for sure, when, how or what is going on inside a Sun.

Let me bring up a few examples and then you will realize how complicated the Sun is for scientists.

The most common one is that we assume that our Sun formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and that it has not changed dramatically in its existence. Scientists also think that our Sun is now about middle-aged and has another 5 billion years to go.

Since 1904 until now, there are so many variations of theories that exist, that when you want to know about the Sun, you get confused; because each scientist has his/her own theory and when you compare them to each other, each one contradicts the other.

One of the main theories would be that a nuclear fusion reaction in the Sun’s core creates the powerful energy of the Sun. Most scientists believe that most of the Sun’s life energy is produced by this nuclear fusion in the core region. This theory is supported by a group of top scientists around the world, including Albert Einstein. Mr. Einstein has related that the source of the Sun’s energy output to be equivalent to his mass-energy formula of E=mc2. How this nuclear fusion is taking place though is a mystery and no one can explain it.

They believe that the core is the only region in the Sun that produces a substantial amount of thermal energy through nuclear fusion. 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by the time it reaches 30% of the radius, the fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers. Finally, it is transferred to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space as sunlight or the kinetic energy of particles. The core has a density of about 150 times the density of water and temperatures can reach close to 15.7 million degrees Kelvin. By contrast, the sun’s surface temperature is about 5800K at the equator.

This is one of the major theories that have existed for more than one hundred years and most cosmologists believe it strongly. Also, by recent studies, they believe that the Sun is composed of two of the lightest chemical elements of the periodic table. Hydrogen is holding 74.9% and helium accounts for 23.8% of the mass of the Sun. The remaining elements, which consist of less than 2%, are Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively.

Furthermore, the nuclear fusion in the Sun's core has modified the composition by converting hydrogen into helium, so the Sun’s innermost portion is now roughly 60% helium, with the abundance of heavier elements unchanged. The Sun’s death will occur after the hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped. Then the sun will collapse into itself.

All this that has been mentioned about the nuclear fusion inside the Sun and the life expectancy is just speculation and not definitive; but scientists strongly believe all the above because there is no other strong theory that exists. One thing is certain however, the content of the Sun is hydrogen and helium. All this information is just about our Sun that has been collected in the last few decades.

Unfortunately, there is so much information out there about our Sun, which in many ways contradicts each other, and many of which do not follow the laws of physics that we know, and they all have theoretical problems.

Theoretical Problems

The biggest problem of all is that the hydrogen element that we know here on Earth cannot survive at such high temperatures. It would rip apart in a fraction of a second at such temperatures. The question arises, how could a hydrogen atom in a sun create this tremendous energy (high temperature of millions of degrees) for billions of years? It does not fit into the physics that we know.

For producing photons, the electromagnetic force in the atom must generate these photons, but the inside of the Sun does not show any evidence of a large electromagnetic force. This is another reason why the electromagnetic force in the atoms has stayed put as a theory for more than half a century.

Also, the scientists think that the Sun is over 99% of the entire mass of the solar system because they believe our Sun is made of heavy-elements. But the Sun has more than 98% of two of the lightest elements in the periodic table, hydrogen and helium. So, what are these considered heavy-elements? No one has any clue.

Scientists think that the Sun’s energy is creating a lot of mass, because of Albert Einstein’s theory of E=mc², in which the energy of photons is producing mass, (a photon has no mass), while the mass itself is a mystery in our Universe. The scientists don’t know how matter got in the Universe, or how the Universe is gaining and producing a mass. But most important of all, is that they don’t know how the photon is created by the hydrogen atom continuously for billions of years, and how the hydrogen atom is surviving at that temperature of millions of degrees. Another theoretical problem is with the energy that the Sun has been producing for more than 4 billion years continuously through nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun. This does not make any scientific sense, because nuclear fusion that we know creates tremendous heat, with ultraviolet rays not photons, and the energy is accrued one time not continuously, but there is no such color or indication of action of nuclear fusion in the sun. Also, if a sun has tremendous gravity, then why does it have different speeds in different sections of its body? Or why are comets and asteroids rejected by the sun through its flaming?

As you can see, the Sun is a very complicated star that we really don’t know much about, because everything that the scientists are thinking reveals that one side of the equation does not match with other side of the equation.

How the Sun was formed

(According to today’s scientists)

At first, I would recommend you go to social media and search for “how the Sun was formed” then you will get more familiar with our Sun. Not to mention that most of the theories are about ourSun, not any other suns, because the scientists didn’t go that far.

Here is a concise belief and general idea of how our Sun was created from the scientist’s point of view.

The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a large gravitational collapsing cloud of gas inside an interstellar cloud. This cloud was pulled by a supernova for several million years before the collapse, and then it became a rotating disk with a large central knot where most of the mass is concentrated in the center. With high gravity and pressure in the region it flattened out into a disk and eventually it created planets and our Solar system’s body was shaped. And later, all the planets were formed.

The central knot continued to collapse under its own strong gravity force; it caused the interior of the Sun’s temperatures to soar, more than several million degrees. The hydrogen became deuterium atoms and started to fuse through nuclear force and created thermonuclear energy and it became the Sun that we know.

The scientists believe the Sun is about halfway through its life’s expectancy. By nuclear fusion reactions in its core, it fuses hydrogen into helium. The Sun is gradually becoming hotter during this time of its main development, because the helium atoms in the core occupy less volume than the hydrogen atoms that were fused. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, and make a stronger gravitational force.

Today’s scientists observed and believe that our sun has 74.9% hydrogen, and 23.8% helium, and has 700 million times more mass than all other planets added together in our solar system. Also, Einstein whispered that the Sun’s mass puts more dent in the space-time curvature.

As you can realize, everything that you have read above is all mechanics with no explanation of any source. It’s all speculation, with no sign of evolved nature. It is unrealistic for scientists of physics to describe the forming of our Sun differently from the other suns.

NOTE: Accretion’s law of quantum physics does not support creation of the universe as an accidental event by the four dumb forces of the Big Bang theory. When the BB theorists pronounced it, it was for a one galaxy universe, not for billons of galaxies of the universe we know today. Thus, the theory of the formation of the sun is limited to our Sun only.

How the Sun was formed

(My version from a panpsychist quantum perspective)

Everything in the Universe is following the nature of panpsychist quantum law, because the Universe is made of the fundamental building blocks of panpsychist elementary particles. This is the law of physics that we know. There are no flaws, no exceptions, no mistakes, and no improper functions in the law of quantum physics. If there is something that is a mystery to us, it is just because we don’t know the proper version of the source of the quantum particle of it; otherwise it is not hard to understand. The suns with their massive bodies are created from the same principle of quantum accretion that created the whole Universe, and therefore they cannot be an exception when the whole Universe started from Panpsychist Quantum Constituent Elementary Particles (PQCEP).

My perception of the creation of a sun is not just limited to our sun, or our solar system, it is applied to all several hundred billion galaxies’ of suns, where each galaxy is hosting several billions of suns or solar systems. Each sun must pass through a precise routine to become a complete sun. Suns at their very first moment are formed from one atom and, based on the accumulation of the suns’ hydrogen, they become hotter and larger.

It is like us, at the first moment in our mother’s womb, one DNA multiplied itself repeatedly to create us. And for the sun’s version, it gathers its atoms one by one to create a sun.

In the future we will learn that each solar system is forming very much the same way and even the galaxies are formed in a similar outline, because the elements of each galaxy are the same and they are all inside the Universe. Imagine the Universe as a tree and all the galaxies are its fruit, and all the fruit grow the same way, yet none of the fruit are the same.

The personality and character of any sun is described as follows: All suns are collectors and are attracted to a particular hydrogen of its own kind of atom that is special for that specific sun only. Suns are the lightest component in the Universe, because they are made of the lightest elements. They are the creators of unprecedented spacewaves and temperature. They are made of their own hydrogen and they create their own helium. Their hydrogen creates photons and the photons are accumulated inside the sun’s body to create their high temperature with high frequency and short wavelengths to become denser energy “gamma rays”. Suns are in the center of numerous planets which are going around them to protect the sun (the queen) from any intruders. They are situated in such a manner to support and protect all the life in their region. They have a negative gravity force, or reverse gravity, which does not allow any intruder to come into their territory because of this negative gravity personality.

As you can see, everything I’ve mentioned for a sun’s personality is different from what you’ve heard before. In two or more occasions they are exactly opposite of all that the scientist’s axiom implies. First, that all suns are the lightest mass component in the Universe, and second, that the sun is carrying a negative gravity. These unprecedented statements are the precise opposite of what the scientists taught us, and it even contradicts Albert Einstein’s theories as well. Additionally, suns are the creators of all the waves in the space of the Universe, not to mention that the S-H is different from our hydrogen here on Earth as is generally thought.

Don’t forget that all the planets in the Universe are weightless anyway, because of the Universe’s rotation, but they are still carrying their own mass and the mass of a sun is actually less than any planet.

The reason I mention the sun is the lightest mass is because it is made of a special hydrogen atom; also, we know a hydrogen atom has the lightest mass of any atom that mankind knows. It will scientifically be proven one day that the sun is made in such a way that it matches with all the laws of quantum physics, based on accretion of PQCEP as well as synchronicity of duality.

Let me briefly explain each of the Sun’s characters that I mentioned above.

Collector of the Special Hydrogen Atom

The structure of our hydrogen atom has brought a lot of tension and conflict among scientists because the normal hydrogen that we know cannot survive in the high temperature environment of a sun; therefore, there is uncertainty of what causes the sun to generate such high temperatures of energy for so long a period of time (billions of years). Yet we know the majority of the Sun’s volume is occupied by hydrogen.

The suns hydrogen atom is therefore different from the Earth’s hydrogen atom, because our Earth’s hydrogen atom cannot produce light with high temperature, nor can it survive in a sun’s high temperature. It breaks apart in a fraction of a moment in the million degrees of the temperature of a sun. Therefore, the Sun’s hydrogen must have a stronger gravity quark force inside the hadron to hold its electron, because if an atom loses its electron(s), it would not be an atom anymore, and the electron wouldn’t be an electron any longer. Not to mention that based on duality and the nature of the Universe, there must be a hydrogen atom to complement and support the hydrogen atom that is creating life.

The sun-hydrogen (S-H) atom has one electron and one major duty to perform, which is just producing photons to protect the life-hydrogen (L-H) that we know. This is the law of synchronicity of duality. The S-H is attracted to each other based on their *long gravity. At first the long gravity collects them and puts them together to make a cluster of a cloud of S-H. Since this cluster of S-H is in the “space” of the Universe it becomes a spherical shape and a sun is born. All the chemical elements in gas or liquid form, create a spherical shape anywhere in the space of the universe, due to the rotation of a spherical hollow universe and characteristics of space that make wave through temperature, i.e. raindrops, bubbles or atoms.

If we place some gas elements is a square glass container, we will see, the gas forms a spherical shape.

*Long Gravity in an atom is connecting or holding similar atoms like O2 of our atmosphere.

As the little sun is growing, the speed of collecting the S-H in the region gets faster and the layer of the spherical shape of the S-H inside the sun gets thicker and the temperature rises.

This process is following the law of accretion of S-H atoms, and all suns must follow this procedure to become a sun. This process takes a long time to become a larger sun. The S-H can produce sunlight for tens of billions of years, because the content of the hadron’s duty is to just produce heat to support life for all the planets in the galaxy

Suns are the Lightest element in the Universe

At the very first moment of creation, a special S-H atom started to create light. The S-H is very similar to our hydrogen here on Earth that we know, because it has just one electron; but inside the hadron, the elementary particle of strong gravity is performing with electrons in different forms to create photons. Since it has just one electron, it is considered as the lightest complete unit of the Universe. The S-H has a different characteristic behavior from the Earth’s hydrogen in quantum physics, therefore it is the lightest unit in the Universe.

The difference between L-H and S-H is the performance of one or more quarks of the elementary particles in the hadron; otherwise it has the same mass. In chemistry there are many atoms that have the same mass, but different characters in the hadron. It is called an Isotope.

This S-H seems that it has only one offspring which is carrying strong gravity force as well and can survive in the sun, it is called sun-helium (S-He). There is no indication of heavier elements other than the S-He atoms in the sun. The characteristic of both S-H and S-He also are different. S-H’s duty is to only make photons continuously. While the S-He’s duty is to protect the stability of the S-H by its positioning over the S-H in a sun, and additionally it is filtering and inspecting the sunlight for quality perfection before radiating out of the sun which in different sections of the sun releases different frequencies and wavelengths.

To demonstrate accretion of massless photons, using a magnify glass to unify or compact sunlight is a good example.

Creator of Space Wave

The source of the wave in the Universe is unknown by today’s science. In addition, we think the impact of the Big Bang created a wave that can travel at the speed of light to expand the space. In general, the “wave” in the Big Bang theory has never been mentioned before as a primary element that has a direct relationship to the life of an atom in the Universe.

The notion of any mechanical wave should be that it will fade or disappear after 14 billion years of traveling and expanding in the Universe’s space in an infinite platform. Even still, we are observing that there is no indication of a spreading or traveling wave in all directions in space.

Meanwhile, we are continuously witnessing that a variety of waves exist in the space of the Universe that makes us think that the wave is still being produced in the space of the Quantum Universe.

When we reconcile these two paragraphs above, it makes it clear that wave and temperature exist in a galaxy together and they are corresponding to each other. Fundamentally, there is no spot in the galaxy without wave, even in an atom, because an atom occupies the space of a galaxy.

In the earlier 1900’s, some physicists had become reconciled with wave-particle duality and proposed that particles such as an electron or nuclei would have wavelike properties; but unfortunately, all these exhibits have been forgotten for more than half a century. The quantum wave length should be studied further, because these waves in the atom do exist. I am very optimistic that in the near future science will reveal many unknown concepts in the quantum field; but in particular the discovery of the communication tools of the wave inside an atom will be one of the most unprecedented remarks that my theory has presented.

Furthermore, we really don’t know much about the source of this phenomenon of the wave in space, but it is the source of all the communication between everything in the Universe. For example, all our senses are transmitted with wave inside our body, and all the atoms in our body survive with wave through pressure and temperature. Therefore, this natural remark of wave must be involved with everything and even the creation of all spherical shapes in the Universe including the atom.

The existing wave in the hadron must be one of the first primary functions in the hadron after the creation of space. My belief is that all atoms are carrying a wavelike property in the hadron for a communication tool between the center and the electron(s). Our bodies, which collectively are created by atoms and molecules, and that are the source of our existence, are controlled by wave.

There is no doubt that the sun is creating a variety of high frequency waves with short wavelength for the photons to travel at high speeds for long distances to deliver life support for far away planets (like from our Sun to the planet Neptune) that the actual heat of the Sun cannot reach directly as it does for our Earth.

Scientists think that the sunlight can travel at the same speed of light to infinite. But the sunlight would be exhausted eventually, because nothing can travel to infinite. Even the gamma ray, as it is traveling, would lose its energy through the cold space in the long run and will convert to sunlight (visible light) in the far distance in the galaxy. This phenomenon, that sunlight will be exhausted after a long distance of travel, is unprecedented and has never been mentioned and tested, though scientists detected gamma-rays billions of miles away from the sun, but logically it makes scientific sense that, as heat is traveling through cold space, it loses temperature.

Photons are energy in the form of temperature and any energy that travels with the wave releases its energy through friction with the very cold space between the planets. The reality is that as soon as the high frequency and short wavelength reaches out from the direct region of a sun, it would start to lose its original frequency and wavelength.

The science of physics has proven that any wave will lose its oscillation after a while of traveling. Think of a radio wave that would fade as it is traveling. This is the law of physics that any wave with friction will lose speed, and any heat wave will lose temperature as it travels. Any speed with wave will exhaust itself ultimately. It would be a disaster if the sunlight could travel to infinite, because then there would not be that many galaxies in the Universe. The whole Universe would be one huge unorganized, one-galaxy,Universe. Furthermore, to extend this thought, if the sunlight could travel to infinite, the Universe would not have an inside or an outside.

To put the sun’s energy in laymen’s terms, a cooler box is a good example. After a certain period of time, a heated object loses temperature and ice will gain temperature, or both of them will adapt to the environments’ temperature. Think of the ice as the space of the Universe and the photon as a hot object.

Negative Gravity

It is a shocking statement for the world of cosmology to say that the suns have a negative gravity, while all the scientists are saying that the sun’s strong gravity is holding all the planets around it. But, in reality, the only way for the sun to stay alive for billions of years, is that it must have negative gravity to survive.

When it mentions gravity, it means the unification in the atoms which sorts the elements in the formation of the planets or suns; because we have already rejected Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of gravity. Read my book for detail.

So, the gravity of the Sun (or suns) is opposite the Earth’s sorting element gravity. It means the suns’ gravity would place all the lightest elements in the center of the sun as opposed to the heavier elements that center themselves in the earthlike planets.

If we cut our Sun into two halves, from the center to the crest of the skin, the order of progression would be: photons (no mass), S-H, S-He, and the remaining heavier elements which are less than 2% such as Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively would be at the outer surface.

Therefore, anything heavier than the S-H or helium is rejected and expelled out of the region by the high temperatures of the sun. Sometimes we can even see with special filtered lenses the Sun-flares miles (Km’s) above the surface of the Sun because of this reason. The Sun’s nature is to get rid of elements such as carbon, oxygen, neon, and iron or any other heavier element out of its surface or its territory. Any element besides the S-H and S-He in a sun represents an impurity or an infection of the sun. The main reason is because any chemical element that we know would kill the sun’s function if it reached the center. Suns are very smart and sensitive regarding the impurity of our chemical elements. They know that if any heavy elements reach inside of them, it would kill them. This is the nature of a sun, anything that L-H is making, is poison for them.

Each photon, as S-H, is creating just has fractional part of the photon is not as complete as sun rays, and it does not have enough temperature to travel very far away nor does it have high frequency or wavelength to keep its high temperature; therefore, it takes a long time to be inclusive in the sun for the accretion’s process. The sun wants to make a comprehensive variation of sun beams that all the planets around it can get the equal benefit from. The high heat mysteriously is compacted in very high frequency and very short wavelengths that can skip through S-H at first, and then can pass through more compact atoms of the S-He and finally come out of the sun.

The strangest part of this event is the accretion of the photons. It is when most of the photons are packed by millions of degrees of temperature into a single form, where the heat becomes invisible into the very high frequency and very short wavelength that can pass through S-He. Yet some would not be able to do this task and are left behind, but they still hold very high temperature. The only reason this occurrence is happening is because of the synchronicity duality principles that even exist in the photons. The photons are divided into different forms.

One version can get the heat of millions of degrees of temperature in invisibleform into high frequency and short wavelengths that can carry heat for billions of miles (km) to the most remote planet in that solar system. The second version of the photons would get very high heat in visibleform in its mass-less form that we call photons. The idea of very high frequency and short wavelength is that the heat is sitting inside the wave, and this wave can carry its heat for a long journey.

The sunlight that we observe daily must go through thousands of procedures and thousands of years to be complete. Then with so much inspection and filtering, finally after it passes these qualifications then it can be released from the Sun.

These two (visible) photon and wave-photon (invisible), are synergistic and complement each other all the time. The most common one is when wave sunlight is coming out of the sun. First, the visible photon is escorting it until it loses its energy and then, secondly, the wave photon alone runs its energy for the long journey in the cold space of the Universe.

The Sun is the Creator of Wave-Temperature

The source of wave in space surely originates from the suns, because wave and temperature always are together and these two cannot be separated from each other. As we know the sun is creating temperature and therefore also creating wave. This topic has its own explanation in my book.

How the S-Hydrogen is situated in the Sun

The best metaphor to picture the inside of the sun is a coconut. The dark shell of the coconut is layers of S-He, the white part (meat) is S-H, and the hollow inside of the coconut is occupied by photons.

As the number of S-H is increased by accretion, the sun is growing, but when the heat rises to a certain point then the S-H needs more protection. The intelligent sun will start to make a special helium atom from two S-H to protect the sun’s heat and keep the S-H uniform inside the sun for three major reasons.

The most important one is that as the heat is going up, the heat makes the S-H unstable and it is hard for S-H to stay in the proper position while it is making photons. Here the nature of the sun’s growth creates helium atoms from two S-H atoms to stay over the sun’s surface to manage the S-H. The helium atom has two electrons and these two electrons are bonded together by a stronger gravity force; therefore, it is a more compacted atom than a hydrogen atom, furthermore, the space inside the helium is thicker where S-H cannot escape, due to the size of helium. Since the sun has reverse gravity, the helium atom with more mass, is staying above the S-H like a net around the S-H to hold them consistently. Earlier I mentioned suns are like a coconut. So, the sun’s skin (helium atoms) is getting thicker and stronger for more protection and to filter sunlight accurately for longer distances.

The second reason is that the helium is playing as a protector of S-H and it does not let anything interfere with the S-H’s duty. Therefore, the sun does not let any comets or foreign objects land on its surface, because the sun’s gravitation is calibrated through the surface’s flame and incinerates the intruder comets or others before they can reach the sun’s surface.

The third reason is that the sun will not allow any incomplete photons to go out of the sun, and that is controlled by certain layers of the helium through a filtering process for longer distance planets and moons.

The color of a sun is an indication of many things, the most important one is that the S-H has a high variation for different purposes. Another indication of the color of a sun is the age of the sun, or impurities, layers of S-H, S-He and many other unknown factors. However, no purple sun has been observed if nuclear fusion in a sun exists. As you are perceiving, suns are made of specific atoms that have never been mentioned anywhere before.

My observation of our Sun, for the size and energy that our Sun is producing, is that it is actually very calm; but scientists are saying that in the sun’s center, there is nuclear fusion that creates the sun’s heat, and which has enormous mass and gravity.

It is very easy to rejectthe theory that a nuclear fusion is happening in the center of the sun, and that the sun has a tremendous mass and gravity in the center. It is obvious that such hydrogen nuclear fusion cannot exist in such a high temperature environment for billions of years without any initiative, nor will it keep doing so for another four billion years or more without any source and motivation. There is no strong endorsement in the science of physics to back up such a nuclear fusion theory to power a sun such as:

* Nothing in the Universe is working mechanically, as Einstein is stating. The strong gravity theory of Einstein would attract heavy elements into the sun and kill the sun right away.

* A strong gravity does not make any scientific sense in a sun. Or mechanical gravity as it is described as a pulling force that applies at certain distances, and not by multi-distances for all the planets and moons in our solar system.

* A big mass in the center of a sun does not make any sense, when over 98% of the Sun is made of hydrogen and helium atoms.

* Big mass and strong gravity (conventional thinking) would not let the Sun’s equator move faster than its two poles; according to Einstein’s theory of gravity, each part of a planet is pulled by the same gravity source equally.

* The strong gravity would not let any heavier element, such as iron, stay on the top surface of the Sun moving freely. The strong gravity would pull heavier elements into the Sun’s center, i.e. heavier elements on the earth sink to the center.

* The nuclear fusion in the center of the sun is not following the law of physics; because nuclear-fusion can produce heat once but can not survive in that heat. Nuclear-fusion in the sun’s core would have such impact that it would show many things; such as, expansion or contraction of the sun’s body for short periods of time. It should show these effects on the surface, but it does not.

* Scientists have recorded a sonogram of the Sun, and the energy that it is generating, is actually considered to be a quiet, calm star.

The only conclusion and practical theory would be that the Universe is a complete well-organized universe in which its suns are following quantum accretion of photons that is created by S-H utilizing quantum principles.

My speculation is that from the center of the sun, about 45% of its radius is occupied by photons, no mass. The remainder would be about 35% hydrogen and the rest of the 20% would be all helium and heavy elements on surface.

This is the actual structure of the Sun. If there are any other elements, besides hydrogen and helium, they are not part of the sun. They are polluting the sun and the sun wants to be liberated from them.

Suns are situated somehow that all the planets around a sun want to protect it; therefore, it is rare for an intruder such as a comet or asteroid to reach the sun. However, it is not completely unheard of either for a comet to get to the sun. As much as the planets around the Sun are protecting the Sun, the Sun as well, is protecting them by a variety of wave frequencies and wavelengths of sunlight.

For example: The gamma-ray or X-ray is a tool of the sun to destroy big comets from far away in space, because most of the comets have ingredients of water or light chemical elements inside, destroyed by gamma-rays. The same gamma-ray can travel to the farthest planet to support life as visible light.

The north and south poles above the sun’s surface have higher temperatures than the middle surface of the sun. Any comet is rejected and dissolved by the corona’s high heat and the gamma rays disrupting the atoms and molecules in space before contact with the sun. This is the way that an intelligent sun is protecting itself, so to speak. This is the best scenario, but sometimes they reach the sun anyway; for example, our sun has some residue of these comets over its surface. However, our Sun has less than 2% of infectious elements.

But it is very interesting that, if any S-H or cluster of S-H is within the territory of a sun, it would tend to go towards the hotter sun or to the bigger sun’s direction without any interference because eventually it would merge with the sun through accretion and make the sun hotter and bigger. How these S-H is going inside of the sun, my speculation is from the coronal area, where the single photon is generated.

The indication of planets going around a sun, or moons around planets is the hard evidence that the Universe is well organization with accurate structure to place everything in an orderly fashion to its will. Simply the Universe is an intelligent entity with an evolutionary journey, not an accidental explosion.

What is a Sun’s obligation?

The sun’s compulsion is to provide life for all the planets in its orbit, it does not matter how far they are from the sun. The planets are never formed until the host sun can provide and guarantee the life support for them.

The nature of a solar system is this: as the sun is getting bigger, more heat generates, and at the same time mysteriously more planets start to form and go around the sun. This is the nature of growing.

There are many factors that exist, but one of my strongest hypotheses is that the friction of a galaxy’s rotation with space would create two electromagnetic fields in which the two positive and negative fields would pull each other constantly. Furthermore, the original shape of all the galaxies is flat when they are formed in the Universe. (Further details are in my book).

Although all the complete and organized solar systems are flat and all the planets are going around a sun in this flat plane, my instinct is telling me, the reason that all the planets form on one plane around a sun is very simple, to stay alive. All the suns have a short window region located at the equator area; this is the only area where all the sun’s energy, complete photons and high frequency and short wavelengths are emitting out from the sun, which supports and sustains all life in the region.

The Suns’ Equatorial Window of Photons

As we know the photon is a bifurcation of two different categories. First, it is traveling by waves and second, it is traveling by a unity-photon to escort the sun’s wave.

The temperature on the surface of our Suns’ corona is millions of degrees different from the equator. Only the photon itself can get over a million visible degrees of temperature. But only the wave-photon can come out of the sun’s equatorial window; therefore, all the planets place themselves within this trajectory window.

When planets get this heat, they distribute it to the center of their body. This is the nature of the survival of planets. If the heat is more than enough, the planets store the excess energy inside the core for other usage, such as creating other elements or for future needs.

For example: if a planet is a gaseous planet, it is using the heat to create heavier elements in the core. Like Saturn, Jupiter or any gaseous cluster, at first, the light elements are pushed to the surface, and ultimately, they become a regular planet like Earth. For a better understanding of a comet read my book, The Quantum Mechanics Universe, in the corresponding chapter on H2O.

Why nature made the sun to function this way is proving the perfectionism of the Universe to bring this detail to our mind. Of course, it is hard to believe, but this is the best scientific explanation for all the solar systems in the Universe. Albert Einstein thought the flatness of our solar system is because of the Sun’s mass; therefore, he proposed his space-time platform, but the reality is, solar systems are formed on the equatorial line of their galaxies sun. This is very important to remember; each galaxy has a line that separates north from south. For the same reason every so many thousand/millions(?) of years, our earth changes its Polarity, due to the galaxies somersault movement within the Universe. (Details in my book).

How the Planets go around a Sun

When a sun starts to become a sun, the nature of atoms and molecules want to be close to the heat to stay alive. As the sun gets bigger, the heat is increased, and the dust ring of matter increases and starts to move around the sun keeping some distance. This cloud of dust would collapse and form a ring surrounding the young sun and eventually by weak and long gravity in the atoms it will collect dust in the pathway, and make a little planet, while the microgravity will sort all the matter and become a natural planet that goes around the sun. As the sun is getting bigger and creating more heat, the accretion of micro gravity and the accretion of spin make the rotation of the planets coordinate with the rotation of the Universe…and naturally planets are born. Again, as the sun is getting bigger, other planets form.

This is the very basics of forming a solar system that eventually create a larger solar system, which is following the natural law of quantum physics and accretion. There are thousands or millions of combinations accrued during the intercourse of the billions of years needed to form a solar system, but the basic ingredient is the accretion of panpsychist quantum elements.

The best example in our solar system, would be that the planet of Mercury was created first, and as the Sun got larger and hotter the planet of Venus formed second, and then the Earth…etc.

At one time the planet of Mercury may have had living species, like our Earth; but as the sun grew bigger, all the light elements such as water and the ingredients for life’s chemistry evaporated to Venus. And as the Sun grew bigger and hotter, the same scenario might have happened to Venus, and created the life on Earth. You never know, if the sun grows even hotter or bigger in the next few billion years, it might transfer all the light elements from Earth such as water, oxygen, and life organism to Mars.

This testimonial, that as the sun is getting bigger and hotter it makes the next planet develop living conditions, makes common sense. Additionally, it is making my theory that the suns have reverse gravity even stronger.

This is the standard of creation of a solar system. As the sun is getting larger and hotter, the electromagnetic force is getting stronger, and as a result the numbers of the planets are increased. The Sun has a little electromagnet force. Because of it the outer side has friction with the space wave.

It seems all the Big Bang fans believe that all the suns in the Universe are not more than 14 billion years old; but some of the suns are a million times bigger than our Sun and therefore, by the law of accretion, the Universe must be much older than we think.

How can Heat travel a long distance?

The sun is creating a variety of sun beams with low to high frequency and from long to short wavelengths. Each frequency belongs to certain planets or is traveling for a certain distance. For example: Gamma-ray can travel a longer distance than the X-ray. I believe they are quantum, non-electromagnetic waves, but this is beside my point, and I believe that in the future we will find the real quantum wave property inside of atoms.

NOTE: If quantum physics thinks that the electron with an electromagnetic field is creating photons, then all the rays must have electromagnetism and it would bring the speed of the photon to a halt by its polarity’s force.

The sun makes a variety of rays. Some are visible (very small proportions) that we are experimenting with on our Earth, but the majority of them cannot be seen by the naked eye such as ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays (extremely energetic with radiation); but they are all carrying light in different forms. These rays have high frequency and a very short wavelength, but still they are traveling at the speed of light with the body of wave while holding temperature inside.

Generally, sunlight is slowed down when it is coming into the Earth’s atmosphere, or into water; therefore, it is also slowed down in the very cold of space and when it is traveling for long distances (billions of km or miles). It is the nature of the sun’s beam to lose its energy or convert into another variation of energy.

NOTE: If any of us were exposed to just one second of high frequency and short wavelengths (gamma-rays), we would not notice it for a minute, but then we would feel as though it was burning through our skin to our bones.

Thus, the ultraviolet light becomes visible for some planets, and the X-ray gives life to the long-distance planets, and ultimately the Gamma-rays would support life for even more remote planets. This means that some of the planets that are the farthest away from the Sun get the same benefit from the sunlight that the closer planets are getting. This principle would apply to even farther away planets such as the blue planet of Neptune and Pluto.

FYI: Life is created by the right size of an atom, and sometimes the distance from a sun is not the subject, but the size of an atom matters.

Conclusion: The principle of each sun in a solar system is based on the equilibrium between producing energy and conserving energy. Suns create a product that has no-volume, no-mass, and no-shadow, but have visible/invisible properties called Photons. Photons are the creation of S-H. At first this photon has a little energy that shows itself by a golden color. This photon mysteriously merges with other photons and they condense themselves to a very high frequency and very short wavelengths and inexplicably come out of the sun in an invisible form, while some unify and show themselves with high temperature and are visible. The Sun’s duty is to use these two kinds of photons to deliver them in the right manner to support all the atoms in all its planets and moons.

On the other hand, all the planets are receiving this energy. They conserve it by absorbing it through their surface and sending the heat to the center of the planet or moon.

The equilibrium of this production and conservation of energy is the principle of each solar system, whole galaxies, and ultimately the whole universe. Simply, nothing is wasted in a quantum intelligent universe.

Sofia Williams added a reply:

The solar system is defined as a system of the Sun and the celestial bodies under its gravitational influence. These include the eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets and cosmic dust and gas. As the primary star, the Sun accounts for 99.86 per cent of the total mass and exerts a gravitational influence that binds the surrounding celestial bodies in orbit.

The fundamental principle underlying the operation of the solar system is the law of gravity. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths that adhere to the principles set forth by Kepler. The planets exhibit disparate periods of rotation and revolution, which are shaped by a range of factors, including their own mass and their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, the material within the solar system is maintained in dynamic equilibrium by the combined forces of gravity, kinetic energy and orbital mechanics.

Furthermore, the solar system is subject to external influences, including the interstellar medium and the gravitational influence of other galaxies. In summary, the solar system is a sophisticated and dynamic astronomical system that exemplifies the fundamental laws of celestial motion and gravitational interaction.

Arne Andersen added a reply:

Your post seems to lack a basic understanding of modern physics? To take the very simplest: Hydrogen atoms can fuse together to form helium. It is what keeps the sun warm. The helium atom is lighter than the hydrogen atoms that formed it. The difference in weight has become energy, in accordance with the well-known formula E=MC2. A colossal pressure is required to push hydrogen into helium. Such a pressure exists quite naturally in a star due to gravity. On Earth, we have achieved the same thing inside an atomic bomb, which acts as a primer for a hydrogen bomb. Where much of the explosive power comes from atoms being pressed together. (Unlike the atomic bomb, atoms are shot into pieces. The pieces are lighter than the starting atom, the rest becomes heat energy) There are constant attempts to force hydrogen together in a "peaceful way", the difficulty is to create the same pressure and temperature as in the interior of the sun.

What is the solar system like? And how does it work?

The building blocks of the Universe is a Panpsychist Quantum phenomenon. This unprecedented statement places us to where Quantum Mechanics become obsolete. To claim this spectacle of a statement, it would change our perception of an unintelligent mechanical universe to an evolutionary universe with a journey. This point of view would apply to every single element of our universe and suns cannot be an exception.

The knowledge that we have of our sun and its ingredients is all physical. We know our Sun has over 98% Hydrogen and Helium, but the Hydrogen and Helium that we know here on Earth cannot produce heat of millions of degrees, continuously, for billions of years. The reality is, the hydrogen that we know, cannot survive for a moment in such heat. Another question is the gravity of the sun. If the Sun has massive gravity, then why can it not hold the whole of its body at the same rate of velocity, because each section of its body rotates at many different speeds. Or, if it is the heaviest planet, then why is it made of the lightest elements known of the periodic table? The formation of a sun is another mystery and the rotation of planets in a plane is another big question mark. But by using the Panpsychist Quantum principles all these questions can be answered.

Key words: Sun-hydrogen, Sun formation, sun’s gravity, sun’s energy, planet rotation, sun rotation, quantum photon energy.

THE SUN

If we ask a toddler to draw a sun, he or she will draw a circle with some lines sticking out around the circle. The lines are representing the sunlight that is coming out of the sun and nothing is going in. This is the exact character of any sun; energy is coming out of the sun and nothing goes into the sun.

We ought to accept the fact that the Universe has been designed to create and survive the old-fashioned way, in a sense, we are duplicating the Universe. We are both made of the same chemical elements and each chemical element must have the same structure to follow, and that without temperature does not exist. Therefore, it brings us to the concept of creating life and supporting life.

To investigate the foundation of life (all species and vegetation), we would end up that life consists of a few atoms and molecules, and these atoms and molecules wouldn’t exist without temperature. The deeper explanation of life is the visibility of all mass conservation of energy. Simply nothing exists without temperature. The ‘life’ is started with a composite of the smallest complete entity unit of the universe, it is pronounced ATOM.

The chart of all the elements of the periodic table is hard evidence that each atom is presenting the exact character of that specific atom. Each atom is carrying its own mass, number of electron(s), size, color, taste, odor, the boiling/freeze point, chemical reaction, performing certain characteristic behavior, and each is holding specific information, and each has an evolutionary journey to create heavier atoms or molecules and ultimately life. Therefore, to achieve their consistency, they need environmental stability with some sort of support, nothing but right energy or temperature. Each atom conserves energy through nature where friction is no subject in an atom’s body. Simply, an atom does not work mechanically. This unprecedented statement discards Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentally.

As we know the strongest, smallest ancestor of every chemical element is the hydrogen atom, where each hydrogen atom is the composite of many unknown numbers of panpsychist quantum particles. Fortunately, we are aware of many types of isotope hydrogen. Yet the hydrogen that we know on earth has a natural journey to make heavier elements (PT). This hydrogen can not be in two places at the same time; therefore, it has the complementary partner to support its expedition. This duality exists in everything in the Universe.

SUN-HYDROGEN

Or

S-H

When and how is a Sun created?

We are going to determined how a sun appears in the Universe and how it is holding itself to survive for hundreds of billions of years with the harmony of the universe quantum nature concept. Suns are the only source of energy in a galaxy, in a sense, it is supporting life in the galaxy.

Sunlight or photons, the product of a sun, is mass-less and travel on a straight line; not forever, because, the nature of the space of the Universe is cold and absorbs energy as it is traveling. Therefore, the high frequency and short wavelength of the sunlight as it’s traveling, loses its energy in the course of billions of miles. The frequency and wavelength of sunlight is designed to support all its planets in its system; thus, finally it is exhausted on the rim of the galaxy. For the same reason the planets in the system are visible, and for the same reason each galaxy in the space of the universe is observed separately.

Suns are smart by nature. As the planets are circling a sun, the sun provides them energy. Sunlight’s duty is to carry and transfer photons (energy) from a sun to each of its planets by different wave lengths. Since it is mass-less it is not affected by anything, not even by the *gravity that most scientists think of; it is, however, affected by going through the long journey of cold space. The Sun is giving visibility and energy to all its surrounding planets, and for the same reason we are able to see and observe the most remote planets.

*See my Gravity is a Myth article or Gravity Is Internal.

But deep inside any sun there are tremendous functions at play that connect all the elements of the atoms in the Universe together, which is way beyond our imagination, because suns are creators of something that we never thought of before.

How much do we know scientifically about a sun? Or are the things that we think we know about the Sun true?

Well, there are some facts that no one can deny, such as: The Sun’s diameter is about 109 times bigger than the Earth and the rotation of the Sun is different from the Earth because it consists of more than 98% of the lightest known elements such as hydrogen and helium. It is like a large hot air balloon of light gas without the balloon itself. The surface of the Sun does not have a boundary; therefore, each part of the Sun has a different speed of rotation, due to its ingredient of a large fragile cloud of a light element.

For instance: the spot on the equator (the large circle) of the Sun, takes 24.47 Earth days to rotate once around or come to the same position; but as you go north or south from the equator, the rotation goes slower. The Sun’s South and North Poles take 38 days to rotate one cycle. These two speeds of rotation are telling us that the Sun does not have a solid body like the Earth, instead it is a hollow sphere with very light gas inside. So, the Sun’s skin is like a flaming ocean that at the equator runs faster than any other area of the Sun. These two speeds have been observed and measured, by an optical telescope, as sunspots that are moving across the Sun’s surface.

The Sun’s temperature varies in different sections; it can reach 6000 to 20,000 degrees centigrade on the surface depending on the region. The temperature of the outer surface of the Sun (corona) is about 1,000,000-2,000,000K, and some parts even go up to about 8,000,000K. This is all fact.

But, when it comes to when the Sun was created, how the Sun was born, what is inside the Sun, or how the sun is generating its energy with golden sunlight, then everything becomes speculation because no one knows for sure, when, how or what is going on inside a Sun.

Let me bring up a few examples and then you will realize how complicated the Sun is for scientists.

The most common one is that we assume that our Sun formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and that it has not changed dramatically in its existence. Scientists also think that our Sun is now about middle-aged and has another 5 billion years to go.

Since 1904 until now, there are so many variations of theories that exist, that when you want to know about the Sun, you get confused; because each scientist has his/her own theory and when you compare them to each other, each one contradicts the other.

One of the main theories would be that a nuclear fusion reaction in the Sun’s core creates the powerful energy of the Sun. Most scientists believe that most of the Sun’s life energy is produced by this nuclear fusion in the core region. This theory is supported by a group of top scientists around the world, including Albert Einstein. Mr. Einstein has related that the source of the Sun’s energy output to be equivalent to his mass-energy formula of E=mc2. How this nuclear fusion is taking place though is a mystery and no one can explain it.

They believe that the core is the only region in the Sun that produces a substantial amount of thermal energy through nuclear fusion. 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by the time it reaches 30% of the radius, the fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers. Finally, it is transferred to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space as sunlight or the kinetic energy of particles. The core has a density of about 150 times the density of water and temperatures can reach close to 15.7 million degrees Kelvin. By contrast, the sun’s surface temperature is about 5800K at the equator.

This is one of the major theories that have existed for more than one hundred years and most cosmologists believe it strongly. Also, by recent studies, they believe that the Sun is composed of two of the lightest chemical elements of the periodic table. Hydrogen is holding 74.9% and helium accounts for 23.8% of the mass of the Sun. The remaining elements, which consist of less than 2%, are Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively.

Furthermore, the nuclear fusion in the Sun's core has modified the composition by converting hydrogen into helium, so the Sun’s innermost portion is now roughly 60% helium, with the abundance of heavier elements unchanged. The Sun’s death will occur after the hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped. Then the sun will collapse into itself.

All this that has been mentioned about the nuclear fusion inside the Sun and the life expectancy is just speculation and not definitive; but scientists strongly believe all the above because there is no other strong theory that exists. One thing is certain however, the content of the Sun is hydrogen and helium. All this information is just about our Sun that has been collected in the last few decades.

Unfortunately, there is so much information out there about our Sun, which in many ways contradicts each other, and many of which do not follow the laws of physics that we know, and they all have theoretical problems.

Theoretical Problems

The biggest problem of all is that the hydrogen element that we know here on Earth cannot survive at such high temperatures. It would rip apart in a fraction of a second at such temperatures. The question arises, how could a hydrogen atom in a sun create this tremendous energy (high temperature of millions of degrees) for billions of years? It does not fit into the physics that we know.

For producing photons, the electromagnetic force in the atom must generate these photons, but the inside of the Sun does not show any evidence of a large electromagnetic force. This is another reason why the electromagnetic force in the atoms has stayed put as a theory for more than half a century.

Also, the scientists think that the Sun is over 99% of the entire mass of the solar system because they believe our Sun is made of heavy-elements. But the Sun has more than 98% of two of the lightest elements in the periodic table, hydrogen and helium. So, what are these considered heavy-elements? No one has any clue.

Scientists think that the Sun’s energy is creating a lot of mass, because of Albert Einstein’s theory of E=mc², in which the energy of photons is producing mass, (a photon has no mass), while the mass itself is a mystery in our Universe. The scientists don’t know how matter got in the Universe, or how the Universe is gaining and producing a mass. But most important of all, is that they don’t know how the photon is created by the hydrogen atom continuously for billions of years, and how the hydrogen atom is surviving at that temperature of millions of degrees. Another theoretical problem is with the energy that the Sun has been producing for more than 4 billion years continuously through nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun. This does not make any scientific sense, because nuclear fusion that we know creates tremendous heat, with ultraviolet rays not photons, and the energy is accrued one time not continuously, but there is no such color or indication of action of nuclear fusion in the sun. Also, if a sun has tremendous gravity, then why does it have different speeds in different sections of its body? Or why are comets and asteroids rejected by the sun through its flaming?

As you can see, the Sun is a very complicated star that we really don’t know much about, because everything that the scientists are thinking reveals that one side of the equation does not match with other side of the equation.

How the Sun was formed

(According to today’s scientists)

At first, I would recommend you go to social media and search for “how the Sun was formed” then you will get more familiar with our Sun. Not to mention that most of the theories are about ourSun, not any other suns, because the scientists didn’t go that far.

Here is a concise belief and general idea of how our Sun was created from the scientist’s point of view.

The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a large gravitational collapsing cloud of gas inside an interstellar cloud. This cloud was pulled by a supernova for several million years before the collapse, and then it became a rotating disk with a large central knot where most of the mass is concentrated in the center. With high gravity and pressure in the region it flattened out into a disk and eventually it created planets and our Solar system’s body was shaped. And later, all the planets were formed.

The central knot continued to collapse under its own strong gravity force; it caused the interior of the Sun’s temperatures to soar, more than several million degrees. The hydrogen became deuterium atoms and started to fuse through nuclear force and created thermonuclear energy and it became the Sun that we know.

The scientists believe the Sun is about halfway through its life’s expectancy. By nuclear fusion reactions in its core, it fuses hydrogen into helium. The Sun is gradually becoming hotter during this time of its main development, because the helium atoms in the core occupy less volume than the hydrogen atoms that were fused. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, and make a stronger gravitational force.

Today’s scientists observed and believe that our sun has 74.9% hydrogen, and 23.8% helium, and has 700 million times more mass than all other planets added together in our solar system. Also, Einstein whispered that the Sun’s mass puts more dent in the space-time curvature.

As you can realize, everything that you have read above is all mechanics with no explanation of any source. It’s all speculation, with no sign of evolved nature. It is unrealistic for scientists of physics to describe the forming of our Sun differently from the other suns.

NOTE: Accretion’s law of quantum physics does not support creation of the universe as an accidental event by the four dumb forces of the Big Bang theory. When the BB theorists pronounced it, it was for a one galaxy universe, not for billons of galaxies of the universe we know today. Thus, the theory of the formation of the sun is limited to our Sun only.

How the Sun was formed

(My version from a panpsychist quantum perspective)

Everything in the Universe is following the nature of panpsychist quantum law, because the Universe is made of the fundamental building blocks of panpsychist elementary particles. This is the law of physics that we know. There are no flaws, no exceptions, no mistakes, and no improper functions in the law of quantum physics. If there is something that is a mystery to us, it is just because we don’t know the proper version of the source of the quantum particle of it; otherwise it is not hard to understand. The suns with their massive bodies are created from the same principle of quantum accretion that created the whole Universe, and therefore they cannot be an exception when the whole Universe started from Panpsychist Quantum Constituent Elementary Particles (PQCEP).

My perception of the creation of a sun is not just limited to our sun, or our solar system, it is applied to all several hundred billion galaxies’ of suns, where each galaxy is hosting several billions of suns or solar systems. Each sun must pass through a precise routine to become a complete sun. Suns at their very first moment are formed from one atom and, based on the accumulation of the suns’ hydrogen, they become hotter and larger.

It is like us, at the first moment in our mother’s womb, one DNA multiplied itself repeatedly to create us. And for the sun’s version, it gathers its atoms one by one to create a sun.

In the future we will learn that each solar system is forming very much the same way and even the galaxies are formed in a similar outline, because the elements of each galaxy are the same and they are all inside the Universe. Imagine the Universe as a tree and all the galaxies are its fruit, and all the fruit grow the same way, yet none of the fruit are the same.

The personality and character of any sun is described as follows: All suns are collectors and are attracted to a particular hydrogen of its own kind of atom that is special for that specific sun only. Suns are the lightest component in the Universe, because they are made of the lightest elements. They are the creators of unprecedented spacewaves and temperature. They are made of their own hydrogen and they create their own helium. Their hydrogen creates photons and the photons are accumulated inside the sun’s body to create their high temperature with high frequency and short wavelengths to become denser energy “gamma rays”. Suns are in the center of numerous planets which are going around them to protect the sun (the queen) from any intruders. They are situated in such a manner to support and protect all the life in their region. They have a negative gravity force, or reverse gravity, which does not allow any intruder to come into their territory because of this negative gravity personality.

As you can see, everything I’ve mentioned for a sun’s personality is different from what you’ve heard before. In two or more occasions they are exactly opposite of all that the scientist’s axiom implies. First, that all suns are the lightest mass component in the Universe, and second, that the sun is carrying a negative gravity. These unprecedented statements are the precise opposite of what the scientists taught us, and it even contradicts Albert Einstein’s theories as well. Additionally, suns are the creators of all the waves in the space of the Universe, not to mention that the S-H is different from our hydrogen here on Earth as is generally thought.

Don’t forget that all the planets in the Universe are weightless anyway, because of the Universe’s rotation, but they are still carrying their own mass and the mass of a sun is actually less than any planet.

The reason I mention the sun is the lightest mass is because it is made of a special hydrogen atom; also, we know a hydrogen atom has the lightest mass of any atom that mankind knows. It will scientifically be proven one day that the sun is made in such a way that it matches with all the laws of quantum physics, based on accretion of PQCEP as well as synchronicity of duality.

Let me briefly explain each of the Sun’s characters that I mentioned above.

Collector of the Special Hydrogen Atom

The structure of our hydrogen atom has brought a lot of tension and conflict among scientists because the normal hydrogen that we know cannot survive in the high temperature environment of a sun; therefore, there is uncertainty of what causes the sun to generate such high temperatures of energy for so long a period of time (billions of years). Yet we know the majority of the Sun’s volume is occupied by hydrogen.

The suns hydrogen atom is therefore different from the Earth’s hydrogen atom, because our Earth’s hydrogen atom cannot produce light with high temperature, nor can it survive in a sun’s high temperature. It breaks apart in a fraction of a moment in the million degrees of the temperature of a sun. Therefore, the Sun’s hydrogen must have a stronger gravity quark force inside the hadron to hold its electron, because if an atom loses its electron(s), it would not be an atom anymore, and the electron wouldn’t be an electron any longer. Not to mention that based on duality and the nature of the Universe, there must be a hydrogen atom to complement and support the hydrogen atom that is creating life.

The sun-hydrogen (S-H) atom has one electron and one major duty to perform, which is just producing photons to protect the life-hydrogen (L-H) that we know. This is the law of synchronicity of duality. The S-H is attracted to each other based on their *long gravity. At first the long gravity collects them and puts them together to make a cluster of a cloud of S-H. Since this cluster of S-H is in the “space” of the Universe it becomes a spherical shape and a sun is born. All the chemical elements in gas or liquid form, create a spherical shape anywhere in the space of the universe, due to the rotation of a spherical hollow universe and characteristics of space that make wave through temperature, i.e. raindrops, bubbles or atoms.

If we place some gas elements is a square glass container, we will see, the gas forms a spherical shape.

*Long Gravity in an atom is connecting or holding similar atoms like O2 of our atmosphere.

As the little sun is growing, the speed of collecting the S-H in the region gets faster and the layer of the spherical shape of the S-H inside the sun gets thicker and the temperature rises.

This process is following the law of accretion of S-H atoms, and all suns must follow this procedure to become a sun. This process takes a long time to become a larger sun. The S-H can produce sunlight for tens of billions of years, because the content of the hadron’s duty is to just produce heat to support life for all the planets in the galaxy

Suns are the Lightest element in the Universe

At the very first moment of creation, a special S-H atom started to create light. The S-H is very similar to our hydrogen here on Earth that we know, because it has just one electron; but inside the hadron, the elementary particle of strong gravity is performing with electrons in different forms to create photons. Since it has just one electron, it is considered as the lightest complete unit of the Universe. The S-H has a different characteristic behavior from the Earth’s hydrogen in quantum physics, therefore it is the lightest unit in the Universe.

The difference between L-H and S-H is the performance of one or more quarks of the elementary particles in the hadron; otherwise it has the same mass. In chemistry there are many atoms that have the same mass, but different characters in the hadron. It is called an Isotope.

This S-H seems that it has only one offspring which is carrying strong gravity force as well and can survive in the sun, it is called sun-helium (S-He). There is no indication of heavier elements other than the S-He atoms in the sun. The characteristic of both S-H and S-He also are different. S-H’s duty is to only make photons continuously. While the S-He’s duty is to protect the stability of the S-H by its positioning over the S-H in a sun, and additionally it is filtering and inspecting the sunlight for quality perfection before radiating out of the sun which in different sections of the sun releases different frequencies and wavelengths.

To demonstrate accretion of massless photons, using a magnify glass to unify or compact sunlight is a good example.

Creator of Space Wave

The source of the wave in the Universe is unknown by today’s science. In addition, we think the impact of the Big Bang created a wave that can travel at the speed of light to expand the space. In general, the “wave” in the Big Bang theory has never been mentioned before as a primary element that has a direct relationship to the life of an atom in the Universe.

The notion of any mechanical wave should be that it will fade or disappear after 14 billion years of traveling and expanding in the Universe’s space in an infinite platform. Even still, we are observing that there is no indication of a spreading or traveling wave in all directions in space.

Meanwhile, we are continuously witnessing that a variety of waves exist in the space of the Universe that makes us think that the wave is still being produced in the space of the Quantum Universe.

When we reconcile these two paragraphs above, it makes it clear that wave and temperature exist in a galaxy together and they are corresponding to each other. Fundamentally, there is no spot in the galaxy without wave, even in an atom, because an atom occupies the space of a galaxy.

In the earlier 1900’s, some physicists had become reconciled with wave-particle duality and proposed that particles such as an electron or nuclei would have wavelike properties; but unfortunately, all these exhibits have been forgotten for more than half a century. The quantum wave length should be studied further, because these waves in the atom do exist. I am very optimistic that in the near future science will reveal many unknown concepts in the quantum field; but in particular the discovery of the communication tools of the wave inside an atom will be one of the most unprecedented remarks that my theory has presented.

Furthermore, we really don’t know much about the source of this phenomenon of the wave in space, but it is the source of all the communication between everything in the Universe. For example, all our senses are transmitted with wave inside our body, and all the atoms in our body survive with wave through pressure and temperature. Therefore, this natural remark of wave must be involved with everything and even the creation of all spherical shapes in the Universe including the atom.

The existing wave in the hadron must be one of the first primary functions in the hadron after the creation of space. My belief is that all atoms are carrying a wavelike property in the hadron for a communication tool between the center and the electron(s). Our bodies, which collectively are created by atoms and molecules, and that are the source of our existence, are controlled by wave.

There is no doubt that the sun is creating a variety of high frequency waves with short wavelength for the photons to travel at high speeds for long distances to deliver life support for far away planets (like from our Sun to the planet Neptune) that the actual heat of the Sun cannot reach directly as it does for our Earth.

Scientists think that the sunlight can travel at the same speed of light to infinite. But the sunlight would be exhausted eventually, because nothing can travel to infinite. Even the gamma ray, as it is traveling, would lose its energy through the cold space in the long run and will convert to sunlight (visible light) in the far distance in the galaxy. This phenomenon, that sunlight will be exhausted after a long distance of travel, is unprecedented and has never been mentioned and tested, though scientists detected gamma-rays billions of miles away from the sun, but logically it makes scientific sense that, as heat is traveling through cold space, it loses temperature.

Photons are energy in the form of temperature and any energy that travels with the wave releases its energy through friction with the very cold space between the planets. The reality is that as soon as the high frequency and short wavelength reaches out from the direct region of a sun, it would start to lose its original frequency and wavelength.

The science of physics has proven that any wave will lose its oscillation after a while of traveling. Think of a radio wave that would fade as it is traveling. This is the law of physics that any wave with friction will lose speed, and any heat wave will lose temperature as it travels. Any speed with wave will exhaust itself ultimately. It would be a disaster if the sunlight could travel to infinite, because then there would not be that many galaxies in the Universe. The whole Universe would be one huge unorganized, one-galaxy,Universe. Furthermore, to extend this thought, if the sunlight could travel to infinite, the Universe would not have an inside or an outside.

To put the sun’s energy in laymen’s terms, a cooler box is a good example. After a certain period of time, a heated object loses temperature and ice will gain temperature, or both of them will adapt to the environments’ temperature. Think of the ice as the space of the Universe and the photon as a hot object.

Negative Gravity

It is a shocking statement for the world of cosmology to say that the suns have a negative gravity, while all the scientists are saying that the sun’s strong gravity is holding all the planets around it. But, in reality, the only way for the sun to stay alive for billions of years, is that it must have negative gravity to survive.

When it mentions gravity, it means the unification in the atoms which sorts the elements in the formation of the planets or suns; because we have already rejected Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of gravity. Read my book for detail.

So, the gravity of the Sun (or suns) is opposite the Earth’s sorting element gravity. It means the suns’ gravity would place all the lightest elements in the center of the sun as opposed to the heavier elements that center themselves in the earthlike planets.

If we cut our Sun into two halves, from the center to the crest of the skin, the order of progression would be: photons (no mass), S-H, S-He, and the remaining heavier elements which are less than 2% such as Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively would be at the outer surface.

Therefore, anything heavier than the S-H or helium is rejected and expelled out of the region by the high temperatures of the sun. Sometimes we can even see with special filtered lenses the Sun-flares miles (Km’s) above the surface of the Sun because of this reason. The Sun’s nature is to get rid of elements such as carbon, oxygen, neon, and iron or any other heavier element out of its surface or its territory. Any element besides the S-H and S-He in a sun represents an impurity or an infection of the sun. The main reason is because any chemical element that we know would kill the sun’s function if it reached the center. Suns are very smart and sensitive regarding the impurity of our chemical elements. They know that if any heavy elements reach inside of them, it would kill them. This is the nature of a sun, anything that L-H is making, is poison for them.

Each photon, as S-H, is creating just has fractional part of the photon is not as complete as sun rays, and it does not have enough temperature to travel very far away nor does it have high frequency or wavelength to keep its high temperature; therefore, it takes a long time to be inclusive in the sun for the accretion’s process. The sun wants to make a comprehensive variation of sun beams that all the planets around it can get the equal benefit from. The high heat mysteriously is compacted in very high frequency and very short wavelengths that can skip through S-H at first, and then can pass through more compact atoms of the S-He and finally come out of the sun.

The strangest part of this event is the accretion of the photons. It is when most of the photons are packed by millions of degrees of temperature into a single form, where the heat becomes invisible into the very high frequency and very short wavelength that can pass through S-He. Yet some would not be able to do this task and are left behind, but they still hold very high temperature. The only reason this occurrence is happening is because of the synchronicity duality principles that even exist in the photons. The photons are divided into different forms.

One version can get the heat of millions of degrees of temperature in invisibleform into high frequency and short wavelengths that can carry heat for billions of miles (km) to the most remote planet in that solar system. The second version of the photons would get very high heat in visibleform in its mass-less form that we call photons. The idea of very high frequency and short wavelength is that the heat is sitting inside the wave, and this wave can carry its heat for a long journey.

The sunlight that we observe daily must go through thousands of procedures and thousands of years to be complete. Then with so much inspection and filtering, finally after it passes these qualifications then it can be released from the Sun.

These two (visible) photon and wave-photon (invisible), are synergistic and complement each other all the time. The most common one is when wave sunlight is coming out of the sun. First, the visible photon is escorting it until it loses its energy and then, secondly, the wave photon alone runs its energy for the long journey in the cold space of the Universe.

The Sun is the Creator of Wave-Temperature

The source of wave in space surely originates from the suns, because wave and temperature always are together and these two cannot be separated from each other. As we know the sun is creating temperature and therefore also creating wave. This topic has its own explanation in my book.

How the S-Hydrogen is situated in the Sun

The best metaphor to picture the inside of the sun is a coconut. The dark shell of the coconut is layers of S-He, the white part (meat) is S-H, and the hollow inside of the coconut is occupied by photons.

As the number of S-H is increased by accretion, the sun is growing, but when the heat rises to a certain point then the S-H needs more protection. The intelligent sun will start to make a special helium atom from two S-H to protect the sun’s heat and keep the S-H uniform inside the sun for three major reasons.

The most important one is that as the heat is going up, the heat makes the S-H unstable and it is hard for S-H to stay in the proper position while it is making photons. Here the nature of the sun’s growth creates helium atoms from two S-H atoms to stay over the sun’s surface to manage the S-H. The helium atom has two electrons and these two electrons are bonded together by a stronger gravity force; therefore, it is a more compacted atom than a hydrogen atom, furthermore, the space inside the helium is thicker where S-H cannot escape, due to the size of helium. Since the sun has reverse gravity, the helium atom with more mass, is staying above the S-H like a net around the S-H to hold them consistently. Earlier I mentioned suns are like a coconut. So, the sun’s skin (helium atoms) is getting thicker and stronger for more protection and to filter sunlight accurately for longer distances.

The second reason is that the helium is playing as a protector of S-H and it does not let anything interfere with the S-H’s duty. Therefore, the sun does not let any comets or foreign objects land on its surface, because the sun’s gravitation is calibrated through the surface’s flame and incinerates the intruder comets or others before they can reach the sun’s surface.

The third reason is that the sun will not allow any incomplete photons to go out of the sun, and that is controlled by certain layers of the helium through a filtering process for longer distance planets and moons.

The color of a sun is an indication of many things, the most important one is that the S-H has a high variation for different purposes. Another indication of the color of a sun is the age of the sun, or impurities, layers of S-H, S-He and many other unknown factors. However, no purple sun has been observed if nuclear fusion in a sun exists. As you are perceiving, suns are made of specific atoms that have never been mentioned anywhere before.

My observation of our Sun, for the size and energy that our Sun is producing, is that it is actually very calm; but scientists are saying that in the sun’s center, there is nuclear fusion that creates the sun’s heat, and which has enormous mass and gravity.

It is very easy to rejectthe theory that a nuclear fusion is happening in the center of the sun, and that the sun has a tremendous mass and gravity in the center. It is obvious that such hydrogen nuclear fusion cannot exist in such a high temperature environment for billions of years without any initiative, nor will it keep doing so for another four billion years or more without any source and motivation. There is no strong endorsement in the science of physics to back up such a nuclear fusion theory to power a sun such as:

* Nothing in the Universe is working mechanically, as Einstein is stating. The strong gravity theory of Einstein would attract heavy elements into the sun and kill the sun right away.

* A strong gravity does not make any scientific sense in a sun. Or mechanical gravity as it is described as a pulling force that applies at certain distances, and not by multi-distances for all the planets and moons in our solar system.

* A big mass in the center of a sun does not make any sense, when over 98% of the Sun is made of hydrogen and helium atoms.

* Big mass and strong gravity (conventional thinking) would not let the Sun’s equator move faster than its two poles; according to Einstein’s theory of gravity, each part of a planet is pulled by the same gravity source equally.

* The strong gravity would not let any heavier element, such as iron, stay on the top surface of the Sun moving freely. The strong gravity would pull heavier elements into the Sun’s center, i.e. heavier elements on the earth sink to the center.

* The nuclear fusion in the center of the sun is not following the law of physics; because nuclear-fusion can produce heat once but can not survive in that heat. Nuclear-fusion in the sun’s core would have such impact that it would show many things; such as, expansion or contraction of the sun’s body for short periods of time. It should show these effects on the surface, but it does not.

* Scientists have recorded a sonogram of the Sun, and the energy that it is generating, is actually considered to be a quiet, calm star.

The only conclusion and practical theory would be that the Universe is a complete well-organized universe in which its suns are following quantum accretion of photons that is created by S-H utilizing quantum principles.

My speculation is that from the center of the sun, about 45% of its radius is occupied by photons, no mass. The remainder would be about 35% hydrogen and the rest of the 20% would be all helium and heavy elements on surface.

This is the actual structure of the Sun. If there are any other elements, besides hydrogen and helium, they are not part of the sun. They are polluting the sun and the sun wants to be liberated from them.

Suns are situated somehow that all the planets around a sun want to protect it; therefore, it is rare for an intruder such as a comet or asteroid to reach the sun. However, it is not completely unheard of either for a comet to get to the sun. As much as the planets around the Sun are protecting the Sun, the Sun as well, is protecting them by a variety of wave frequencies and wavelengths of sunlight.

For example: The gamma-ray or X-ray is a tool of the sun to destroy big comets from far away in space, because most of the comets have ingredients of water or light chemical elements inside, destroyed by gamma-rays. The same gamma-ray can travel to the farthest planet to support life as visible light.

The north and south poles above the sun’s surface have higher temperatures than the middle surface of the sun. Any comet is rejected and dissolved by the corona’s high heat and the gamma rays disrupting the atoms and molecules in space before contact with the sun. This is the way that an intelligent sun is protecting itself, so to speak. This is the best scenario, but sometimes they reach the sun anyway; for example, our sun has some residue of these comets over its surface. However, our Sun has less than 2% of infectious elements.

But it is very interesting that, if any S-H or cluster of S-H is within the territory of a sun, it would tend to go towards the hotter sun or to the bigger sun’s direction without any interference because eventually it would merge with the sun through accretion and make the sun hotter and bigger. How these S-H is going inside of the sun, my speculation is from the coronal area, where the single photon is generated.

The indication of planets going around a sun, or moons around planets is the hard evidence that the Universe is well organization with accurate structure to place everything in an orderly fashion to its will. Simply the Universe is an intelligent entity with an evolutionary journey, not an accidental explosion.

What is a Sun’s obligation?

The sun’s compulsion is to provide life for all the planets in its orbit, it does not matter how far they are from the sun. The planets are never formed until the host sun can provide and guarantee the life support for them.

The nature of a solar system is this: as the sun is getting bigger, more heat generates, and at the same time mysteriously more planets start to form and go around the sun. This is the nature of growing.

There are many factors that exist, but one of my strongest hypotheses is that the friction of a galaxy’s rotation with space would create two electromagnetic fields in which the two positive and negative fields would pull each other constantly. Furthermore, the original shape of all the galaxies is flat when they are formed in the Universe. (Further details are in my book).

Although all the complete and organized solar systems are flat and all the planets are going around a sun in this flat plane, my instinct is telling me, the reason that all the planets form on one plane around a sun is very simple, to stay alive. All the suns have a short window region located at the equator area; this is the only area where all the sun’s energy, complete photons and high frequency and short wavelengths are emitting out from the sun, which supports and sustains all life in the region.

The Suns’ Equatorial Window of Photons

As we know the photon is a bifurcation of two different categories. First, it is traveling by waves and second, it is traveling by a unity-photon to escort the sun’s wave.

The temperature on the surface of our Suns’ corona is millions of degrees different from the equator. Only the photon itself can get over a million visible degrees of temperature. But only the wave-photon can come out of the sun’s equatorial window; therefore, all the planets place themselves within this trajectory window.

When planets get this heat, they distribute it to the center of their body. This is the nature of the survival of planets. If the heat is more than enough, the planets store the excess energy inside the core for other usage, such as creating other elements or for future needs.

For example: if a planet is a gaseous planet, it is using the heat to create heavier elements in the core. Like Saturn, Jupiter or any gaseous cluster, at first, the light elements are pushed to the surface, and ultimately, they become a regular planet like Earth. For a better understanding of a comet read my book, The Quantum Mechanics Universe, in the corresponding chapter on H2O.

Why nature made the sun to function this way is proving the perfectionism of the Universe to bring this detail to our mind. Of course, it is hard to believe, but this is the best scientific explanation for all the solar systems in the Universe. Albert Einstein thought the flatness of our solar system is because of the Sun’s mass; therefore, he proposed his space-time platform, but the reality is, solar systems are formed on the equatorial line of their galaxies sun. This is very important to remember; each galaxy has a line that separates north from south. For the same reason every so many thousand/millions(?) of years, our earth changes its Polarity, due to the galaxies somersault movement within the Universe. (Details in my book).

How the Planets go around a Sun

When a sun starts to become a sun, the nature of atoms and molecules want to be close to the heat to stay alive. As the sun gets bigger, the heat is increased, and the dust ring of matter increases and starts to move around the sun keeping some distance. This cloud of dust would collapse and form a ring surrounding the young sun and eventually by weak and long gravity in the atoms it will collect dust in the pathway, and make a little planet, while the microgravity will sort all the matter and become a natural planet that goes around the sun. As the sun is getting bigger and creating more heat, the accretion of micro gravity and the accretion of spin make the rotation of the planets coordinate with the rotation of the Universe…and naturally planets are born. Again, as the sun is getting bigger, other planets form.

This is the very basics of forming a solar system that eventually create a larger solar system, which is following the natural law of quantum physics and accretion. There are thousands or millions of combinations accrued during the intercourse of the billions of years needed to form a solar system, but the basic ingredient is the accretion of panpsychist quantum elements.

The best example in our solar system, would be that the planet of Mercury was created first, and as the Sun got larger and hotter the planet of Venus formed second, and then the Earth…etc.

At one time the planet of Mercury may have had living species, like our Earth; but as the sun grew bigger, all the light elements such as water and the ingredients for life’s chemistry evaporated to Venus. And as the Sun grew bigger and hotter, the same scenario might have happened to Venus, and created the life on Earth. You never know, if the sun grows even hotter or bigger in the next few billion years, it might transfer all the light elements from Earth such as water, oxygen, and life organism to Mars.

This testimonial, that as the sun is getting bigger and hotter it makes the next planet develop living conditions, makes common sense. Additionally, it is making my theory that the suns have reverse gravity even stronger.

This is the standard of creation of a solar system. As the sun is getting larger and hotter, the electromagnetic force is getting stronger, and as a result the numbers of the planets are increased. The Sun has a little electromagnet force. Because of it the outer side has friction with the space wave.

It seems all the Big Bang fans believe that all the suns in the Universe are not more than 14 billion years old; but some of the suns are a million times bigger than our Sun and therefore, by the law of accretion, the Universe must be much older than we think.

How can Heat travel a long distance?

The sun is creating a variety of sun beams with low to high frequency and from long to short wavelengths. Each frequency belongs to certain planets or is traveling for a certain distance. For example: Gamma-ray can travel a longer distance than the X-ray. I believe they are quantum, non-electromagnetic waves, but this is beside my point, and I believe that in the future we will find the real quantum wave property inside of atoms.

NOTE: If quantum physics thinks that the electron with an electromagnetic field is creating photons, then all the rays must have electromagnetism and it would bring the speed of the photon to a halt by its polarity’s force.

The sun makes a variety of rays. Some are visible (very small proportions) that we are experimenting with on our Earth, but the majority of them cannot be seen by the naked eye such as ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays (extremely energetic with radiation); but they are all carrying light in different forms. These rays have high frequency and a very short wavelength, but still they are traveling at the speed of light with the body of wave while holding temperature inside.

Generally, sunlight is slowed down when it is coming into the Earth’s atmosphere, or into water; therefore, it is also slowed down in the very cold of space and when it is traveling for long distances (billions of km or miles). It is the nature of the sun’s beam to lose its energy or convert into another variation of energy.

NOTE: If any of us were exposed to just one second of high frequency and short wavelengths (gamma-rays), we would not notice it for a minute, but then we would feel as though it was burning through our skin to our bones.

Thus, the ultraviolet light becomes visible for some planets, and the X-ray gives life to the long-distance planets, and ultimately the Gamma-rays would support life for even more remote planets. This means that some of the planets that are the farthest away from the Sun get the same benefit from the sunlight that the closer planets are getting. This principle would apply to even farther away planets such as the blue planet of Neptune and Pluto.

FYI: Life is created by the right size of an atom, and sometimes the distance from a sun is not the subject, but the size of an atom matters.

Conclusion: The principle of each sun in a solar system is based on the equilibrium between producing energy and conserving energy. Suns create a product that has no-volume, no-mass, and no-shadow, but have visible/invisible properties called Photons. Photons are the creation of S-H. At first this photon has a little energy that shows itself by a golden color. This photon mysteriously merges with other photons and they condense themselves to a very high frequency and very short wavelengths and inexplicably come out of the sun in an invisible form, while some unify and show themselves with high temperature and are visible. The Sun’s duty is to use these two kinds of photons to deliver them in the right manner to support all the atoms in all its planets and moons.

On the other hand, all the planets are receiving this energy. They conserve it by absorbing it through their surface and sending the heat to the center of the planet or moon.

The equilibrium of this production and conservation of energy is the principle of each solar system, whole galaxies, and ultimately the whole universe. Simply, nothing is wasted in a quantum intelligent universe.

Sofia Williams added a reply:

The solar system is defined as a system of the Sun and the celestial bodies under its gravitational influence. These include the eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets and cosmic dust and gas. As the primary star, the Sun accounts for 99.86 per cent of the total mass and exerts a gravitational influence that binds the surrounding celestial bodies in orbit.

The fundamental principle underlying the operation of the solar system is the law of gravity. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths that adhere to the principles set forth by Kepler. The planets exhibit disparate periods of rotation and revolution, which are shaped by a range of factors, including their own mass and their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, the material within the solar system is maintained in dynamic equilibrium by the combined forces of gravity, kinetic energy and orbital mechanics.

Furthermore, the solar system is subject to external influences, including the interstellar medium and the gravitational influence of other galaxies. In summary, the solar system is a sophisticated and dynamic astronomical system that exemplifies the fundamental laws of celestial motion and gravitational interaction.

The harmful Dye pollution from industrial processes such as textile generated how to remove with magnetic biochar ?

Future of all on earth in year 2050 to 2100...

All negative trends for example

Pollution contamination thought pollution broken societies toxins in food

MATERIALISTIC BLIND RACE...?

How do soil microflora respond to environmental stressors like climate change, pollution, and land degradation? This question might have several answers based on each different locations with same soil analysis report so let us list them all

I suppose there have been questions of this kind, but I do not know how to find them. (Maybe somebody can tell me.)

A task: to transport one ton (1000 kg), at the distance of 100 km, by sped of 100 km/h.

How much pollution is produced, and how much energy is spent to perform this (or similar) task by: (1) steam locomotive, (2) electrical car?

In case (2), the pollution must include the production and decommissioning of batteries, as well as the fact that most electricity is produced by fossil fuels (such as coal). The consumption must include all the losses of energy in transformations, from the power plant to batteries, and from the batteries to electrical engines in the car.

Clean vehicles are surely good for cities, but I do not know how good they are for the planet.

How does the above items impact the goal towards net zero emissions? What might be the role of the emerging scientists, leaders and professionals for achieving sustainability in agriculture sector? What are the policy loopholes that high polluting industries are still doing the same levels of pollutions although facing sanctions against carbon emissions? What consumers can do to reduce emissions from agricultural sector: Is it by consuming low processed foods or eating less?

What are the potentials of these emerging concepts like Carbon farming, Biochar and agroforestry in achieving sustainability?

How does the above items impact the goal towards net zero emissions? What might be the role of the emerging scientists, leaders and professionals for achieving sustainability in agriculture sector? What are the policy loopholes that high polluting industries are still doing the same levels of pollutions although facing sanctions against carbon emissions? What consumers can do to reduce emissions from agricultural sector: Is it by consuming low processed foods or eating less?

What are the potentials of these emerging concepts like Carbon farming, Biochar and agroforestry in achieving sustainability?

Since 1987 WCED report "Our Common Future" pollution has been increasing, not decreasing, as no pollution reduction markets have been set up yet to transition towards pollution-less markets, which raises the question: Why should we expect pollution management markets to lead us increasingly away and away from pollution-less markets?.

Any ideas to the why?

Note: If you understand the difference between how pollution management markets and pollution reduction markets in terms of pollution-less market transition friendliness work, you may be able to see why.

In my next papers I will focus on the fact that past development assumptions made affecting system stability have complicated policy correction and action in terms of system stability problems, like the assumption that market dynamics and population dynamics are independent factors affecting system stability.

What do you think?

Market approaches and population dynamics approaches to system stability issues like environmental problems assume market and population dynamics independency. In other words, they assume market impacts work under population dynamics neutrality: they do not have population dynamics impacts; and population dynamics impacts work under market dynamic neutrality: they do not affect markets,

And this raises the question: Does the market and population dynamics independency assumption used by development practitioners explains the origin of the over population problem?

I think No, what do you think? Why?

Thank you for you help!

tradable pollution

Imagine the WCED 1987 would have set only one sustainable development goal, closing the renewable energy technology gap to make renewable energy a permanent substitute of non-renewable energy as soon as possible and address pollution production head on by transitioning out of dirty economies.

Imagine 2012 RIO +20 would have made only one goal to support the implementation of green markets, to set up a system around implementation, financing, and monitoring of the closing of the renewable energy technology gap in each country as soon as possible to address pollution reduction head on by making pollution reduction a profit-making opportunity.

Imagine the 2015 Paris agreement had only one goal implemented in a socially friendly manner, to close the renewable energy technology gap as soon as possible to lead the dirty economy behind and stop providing benefits to those making money from dirty development.

Instead, attention has been placed on managing the consequences of pollution production markets which keeps renewable energy as a permanent complement and send dirty markets under permanent dirty market failure.

And this raises the question, should making renewable energy a permanent substitute be a clear and practical SDG goal?

What do you think?

Why electric vehicles are called non polluting, when the electricity they are using is being produced from coal?

Hello colleagues,

I am currently researching solar photovoltaic modules and am particularly interested in the development and implementation of pollution monitoring systems. These systems are crucial for maintaining the efficiency and longevity of solar panels by detecting dust and other pollutants that can impede performance.

I have a few specific questions and would greatly appreciate your insights:

Thank you for your time and expertise.

Best regards, Narek Badalyan Ph.D. Student, National Polytechnic University of Armenia

Imaging a world under perfect red market thinking or under perfect socially friendly capitalism since 1776 had Adam Smith giving us that model then instead of the perfect traditional market, would that have created environmental sustainability problems too by 1987/WCED?

What do you think?

Yes, and why do you think so? No, and why do you think so?

Note:

This requires a little thinking outside the box

Which is more polluting to the environment, extracting crude oil and its derivatives or extracting lithium, and how to get rid of it?

I would like to understand how we can apply electrochemistry in minimizing pollution and waste

Do exposure to environmental pollutants and endocrine disruptors negatively affect men's fertility?

The project is on establishing the relationship between the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) pollution and the bioavailable fractions in oil polluted soils

I am having trouble grasping why the Arctic has so much mercury. It seems to be a big deal, since Northern countries fund a lot of research on it, such as the 2018 UN technical report on mercury. Is it only due to Permafrost thawing and releasing mercury? Does atmospheric mercury tend to deposit in the Arctic over other regions?

Due to heavy industrialization pollution is inevitable phenomena around the world and most pollutants are accumulated by soil, air and water. Specially soil pollution directly influencing soil eco-diversity and crop production system. Is it possible to detect soil pollution using GEE machine learning technique?

Concrete batching plant and construction area bring so much pollution to ambient air, such as PM or TSP and some are toxic. Apparently, build barrier wall or plant some vegetations still the better option to prevent air pollution spread out from plant or construction area. 

Do you know what technology is compatible for construction or batching plant areas? Or do you have some idea on how this reactor works (link)? It was UTEC air purification technology.

How many protective belts does the earth have around it? And what's the point?

1 Earth's atmosphere due to the presence of a resistant core that is made up of heavy elements that acts as a strong engine inside the earth and has caused a strong gravitational force and gravity of the earth and the moon.

2 Earth's magnetism, which exists due to the resistant core and the presence of iron in the earth's interior, and due to the currents of electrons in the earth's atmosphere that have come to the earth from solar activity and solar winds, and these electrons revolve around the earth's iron. And like an electric wire that is connected to a battery, they are placed around the planet and have caused a magnetic belt around the planet. And it was created by the magnetism of the Wallen-Allen belt:

3- Wallen Allen, which was created for the first time by James Wallen Allen. which makes the solar winds go away and saves the earth from the calamity of the intense solar heat and also prevents the solar activities that sometimes cause a lot of damage to radio waves and radio waves. Now the question is, why are there so many protectors around the planet? But aren't there protective belts for other planets? Why is the planet Earth located exactly in a place and at a distance from the sun that is called the green or life zone? Does that mean that if it was one bit farther or one bit closer to the sun, life would not have appeared on the planet? Isn't it the wisdom of God that has brought so much prosperity and comfort to us humans? And we have a kind and good God. But we humans don't appreciate it and we are destroying the planet with pollution and pollutants? And do we destroy our environment? And will we change the climate? And we destroy this beautiful world with our own hands. Let's think a little ....?

What is the pollution caused by urea?

How do limitations in multi-element analysis impact the comprehensive understanding of heavy metal interactions in a given environment?

Acid mine drainage AMD

I need help, doing a paper on the plastic pollution of our oceans.

How to apply the 40 inventive principles to mitigate pollution?

A key premise for formulating such questions is the adage that a drop beats a rock. Often, when we wonder whether to choose a bicycle instead of an internal combustion car as a means of transportation in a situation of driving to a nearby store, the answer appears that, after all, with this one gesture, this action performed only by us in a situation where many other people, including neighbors, friends, etc. do not do it, we ourselves will not save the climate and the biosphere. But, after all, this is what many people think. And each individual, if this thinking would change and replace the car with a bicycle then one drop will turn into thousands and then into millions of drops, into rain, into a river and large-scale changes will be realized. The same applies, for example, to the issue of segregating waste, to the use of pesticides in the home garden, to the creation of a flower meadow instead of mowing the lawn, to changing consumption habits to more prudent and sustainable ones, on the reuse of used products and recyclables in the sharing economy, etc. Of course, green financial subsidies, regulatory change are key instruments to motivate this kind of change, to systemically address the issue of smoothly carrying out the green transformation of the economy to build a sustainable, zero-carbon, green closed-loop economy. However, the adage that a drop drills the scale is valid. In this regard, it is particularly important to change the consciousness and mentality of individual people individually and, at the same time, of many people in society.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite you all to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

It is not easy to justify that making traditional economic thinking circular is a win-win economy and environment move as then you would need to use ALTERNATIVE ACADEMIC FACTS, and perhaps that may be the reason I see researchers in Researchgate pushing or promoting this idea, but I have not seen it yet in ACADEMIA.

And this raises the question, Is circular economic thinking currently a purely European/researchgate phenomenon?

Do you see the same thing? What do you think?

The WCED 1987 documented traditional economic thinking as the source of social and/or environmental sustainability as it turned out to be socially and/or environmentally unfriendly.

This is because traditional market pricing only account for the economic costs at a profit, and hence, traditional markets are externalizing social and/or environmental cost associated with economic activity. AS TRADITIONAL MARKET EXPANDS, THE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AND THEIR SUSTAINABILITY GAPS EXPAND.

Hence, Making traditional economic thinking circular still has the social and environmental externality problem associated with it SO IT CAN NOT BE THE SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS IT CREATES. This means that selling circular economic thinking as the solution of sustainability problems requires either paradigm shift knowledge gaps or willful academic blindness as the drivers of willful academic tunneling as the mean to present it or promote it.

And this raises the question; Can we make circular economic thinking the solution of critical problems like the environmental unsustainability without the use of alternative academic facts?

I think No, what do you think? Yes, why you think so? No, why you think so?

In research where the objective is to study the impact of microplastics on soil properties, is it necessary to evaluate the original microplastic concentration of the test soils?

If the soils are polluted with microplastics, are they unsuitable for exposure treatments where additional microplastics (of known characteristics and concentration) will be added to the soil?

I have a few old papers which I believe should be still interesting to some researchers, now. Namely,

1. "On Modeling Incentive Systems which Utilize Pollution Charges for Pollution Abatement" , in J. Environmental and Resource Economics 2: 593--604, 1992,

2. On necessary and sufficient conditions for uniextremality in nonconvex mathematical programming problems", Soviet Math. Dokl., v 30, 1984, No2 , 457 - 459.

The second one is an US translation of my paper, published first in Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences - and there is no USSR, anymore ..

Can I add these papers to my profile - and what type of privacy should I use? I would like to make them readable to other researchers.

Also, I believe long time ago I have profile with my name (Anatoliy Rikun) but another email (Anatoliy_rikun@yahoo.com). Is it possible to merge these profiles?

Finally, a questions - have problem, trying to edit my profile - working at Merck, now - bat cannot change my title "Analyst" - but do not mind to keep it like that.

Thanks,

Anatoliy Rikun, PhD

I want equation that describe the pollution transport to programe it via matlab code

Microplastic pollution

Does anyone know any Internationally reputed Research Journal, that publishes 'Research Papers' in multiple languages together? I have a high-quality, ready-to-publish paper (presented at a national-level conference) in Maithili language (in Devnagri script) that highlights the importance of indigenous Indian Crafts to solve pollution issues in India; and am interested in publishing it as soon as possible. Kindly let me know.

To be able to deal head on with the social and environmental sustainability failures linked to NON-CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY thinking the Brundtland Commission in 1987(WCED) led us away from that type of thinking by recommending sustainable development tools....The WCED did not recommend then to go CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY THINKING to solve the social and environmental problems created by traditional economic thinking as in both economies you are not accounting for the social and environmental costs of doing business.

To be able to deal head on with the environmental sustainability failures linked to NON-CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY thinking the United Nations Commission on Sustainabiled development in 2012(UNCSD) was leading ust the way of circular green markets through green markets, green growth and green economies, away from business as usual.....The UNCSD did not recommend then to go CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY THINKING to solve the environmental problems created by traditional economic thinking as in both economies you are not accounting for the environmental costs of doing business.

In other words, the WCED was trying to fix a social and environmental sustainability problem by using sustainable development means to leave traditional thinking behind; and the UNCSD was trying to fix an environmental sustainability problem using green market thinking.

If the circular economy thinking has the same problems as the non-circular economic thinking of Adam Smith in social and/or environmental terms, how can circular economy thinking be presented today as the solution to the problem that the circular economy is also contributing to?

And this raises the question, Does CIRCULAR ECONOMY THINKING means a WORLD living under permanent social and environmental market failure?

What do you think? If you think No, why do you think so? If you think Yes, Why do you think so?

The Brundtland Commission told us in 1987 in "Our Common Future" that the traditional development model has failed us as it has brought with it deep social and environmental sustainability problems, and to leave TRADITIONAL ECONOMIC THINKING BEHIND they recommended sustainable development thinking, sadly they did not set priorities such as to focus sustainable development thinking to fix the social sustainability problem first, then the environmental sustainability problem or to focus on the environmental sustainability problem first, and then the social sustainability problem or focus on solving both problems, the social and environmental sustainability problems at the same time.

Notice, the WCED did not recommend to go CIRCULAR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT to lead traditional thinking behind.

This lack of foresight led to a very active competition between different sustainable development schools of thoughts, where in 2012 Rio +20 the WIN-WIN ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENTA MODEL or the ECO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL OF THOUGHT WON the sustainable development contest; and they indicated the need to go green market, green growth, and green economies in THE FUTURE WE WANT(UNCSD 2012) as now, there was a priority, to solve the environmental sustainability problem first through green market circularity as WIN-WIN meant that now the environmental cost associated with economic activities were going to be reflected in green market prices.

Notice, that RIO +20 conference did not recommend to go CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY then because they knew it is not pollution reduction friendly as it only account for economic cost of production; and hence it is not consistent with the environmental responsibility priority they had set to advance now environmentally friendly development models.

Both the WCED 1987 approach and the UNCSD 2012 approach are approaches leading the world away from BUSINESS AS USUAL as both of them knew that the sustainability issues they were tasked to solve are driven by irresponsible market behavior in social and/or environmental terms.

Now like if the WCED 1987 process and the UNCSD 2012 process never took place, out of no where the world is systematically pushing the idea of CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY to solve the development problems IT HAS CREATED as documented by those 2 different but linked processes.

They are presenting the idea of the CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY as a solution to the environmental market failure the WCED and the UNCSD linked to traditional market thinking under broken circularity in practice, but circular in theory by the environmental externality neutrality assumption given to us by Adam Smith in 1776 and under which his market can expand for ever without producing environmental externalities. Hence, it seems like the market supporting this CIRCULAR TRADITIONAL ECONOMY is no longer a traditional market, and hence, it is no longer AN ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION PRODUCTION MARKET.

And this raises the question, What type of market and price structure is behind this current push on traditional economy circularity?

What do you think?

If the dwarf green markets implemented through permanent government intervention tends toward extreme environmental policy failure, should you expect governments to deal with environmental protest, through policy or force? If Policy, Why? If force, Why?

What do you think?

The flipping from traditional perfect market thinking to imperfect dwarf green market thinking instead of shifting to perfect green market thinking in 2012 RIO + 20 transformed the role governments play when dealing with market failures and the way they would react when facing democratic and huma rights protest in response to the market failure,....

Which raises the currently important question:Did 2012 Rio +20 transform all governments in the Paris agreement from environmental externality policy correctors and enforcers INTO environmental externality cleaners and enforcers?. If Yes, why? If not, Why?

What do you think?

My major is not atmosphere research, it is inconvenient for me to use the professional model, e.g., GEOS-chem or WRF-chem. Though I know these models could measure the pollution from crop residue burning or other biomass sources with the help of related emission inventory. Are there simple ways to quantity the pollution of this part? Hope your response!

The Brundtland Commission knew or should have known in 1987 they were dealing with a sustainability problem when they concluded that we needed to go beyond business as usual to solve the social and environmental crisis associated with business as usual since 1876, they knew or should have not that this needed a sustainability fix not a sustainable development patch.

If they would not have mixed up a sustainability problem with a sustainable development problem they would have had 3 choices: a) to recommend going red markets if they were giving priority to the social sustainability problem they documented; b) ) to recommend going green markets if they were giving priority to the environmental sustainability problem they documented; and c) ) to recommend going sustainability markets if they were giving priority to the socio-environmental sustainability problem they documented. Instead, they recommended sustainable development, a patch to the issues, that does not take us neither close to the beyond business as usual model they asks us to go.

Then, the Rio + 20 process came along settling the sustainable development discourse by prioritizing the environmental issue and hence, deciding to go green economies, green growth, and green markets.

And this raises the question, Will the period 1987 to 2012 be known in the history of economic thought as a great sustainability thinking failure period?

What do you think?

In 2012 Rio + 20 conference(UNCSD) we were going to go green markets, green growth and green economies, which means we were going to go the way of environmental pollution reduction markets, but we know today that we did not go that way.

We chose to go the way of a patch through environmental pollution management markets instead of going for the fix, green markets, knowing or perhaps failing to know that in environmental pollution management markets the root cause of the pollution production problem is still not fixed.

No wonder, the environmental situation now is worse than it was in 2012, which raises the question: Will the period 2012 to now and perhaps into the foreseeable future be known in the history of economic thought as the green market paradigm shift avoidance period?

What do you think?

Polluted leaves research

Recommend a topic pls.

One of the ways for sequestration of CO2 from the atmosphere is, after somehow separating it from the air, to react it with H2 - to get CH4 that can be used as an energy source. The H2 is obtained mainly by water electrolysis, using for that -electricity.

OBTAINING THAT ELECTRICITY - creates, in principle - CO2 that goes to the atmosphere

So the true amount of CO2 sequestration has to take that CO2 creation into the calculation. (Usually, it is said that "green", not from a polluting source will be used, but, since in principle, green H2 could be used directly as an energy source - reducing the amount of energy from polluting sources - it is not really an answer)

So I will be very grateful if you can give that number - How many moles of CO2 are created in a "dirty" electrical plant Coal/gas/ hydrocarbons for producing the electricity amount needed to produce a mol of H2 - say by electrolysis

thanks all for the attention

Yosi scolnik

What are the solutions to the problem of plastic pollution in the coastal environment? How we can reduce plastic usage in coastal ecosystems? what material we can use instead of plastics?