Politics - Science method

Dear Viola Tsing,

Finding SSCI journals in Politics or International Relations that are both relatively easy and fast to publish in can be challenging, as it often depends on the journal’s scope, review process, and the quality of the submission. However, some journals are known for their faster turnaround times and openness to a wider range of topics. You might consider journals like Global Governance, International Politics, or Foreign Policy Analysis, as they cover broad areas in international relations and politics. Additionally, Review of International Studies and The Hague Journal of Diplomacy might also be worth exploring.

I recommend checking each journal’s website for specific submission guidelines, acceptance rates, and average review times. Also, networking with peers in your field or contacting editorial teams directly can provide insight into their publishing process.

Damian, all my articles have a list of operation concepts if you read the article covering the concepts being used to help readers GO BEYOND TRADITIONAL DEMOCRACY THINKING.... in the case of rule of law:

11) Independent rule of law system, the factual based system that ensures that the laws of thecountry are respected no matter who is in power or may come to power.

12) Non-independent rule of law system, the system that overlooks facts if needed to place ormaintain or preserve a specific movement or ideology in power (PDF) Rethinking democracy 105: Stating the structure of authoritarianism and democracy-based systems in terms majority rule driven voting systems under biding present-absent effective targeted chaos and independent rule of law qualitative comparative boundary conditions. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386345334_Rethinking_democracy_105_Stating_the_structure_of_authoritarianism_and_democracy-based_systems_in_terms_majority_rule_driven_voting_systems_under_biding_present-absent_effective_targeted_chaos_and_ind [accessed Jan 11 2025].

Amel, thank you for taking the time to comment.

Take a look at this article when you have time, it has the founding theory behind a series of articles on the structure, working, and dynamics of exism movements born inside liberal democracies ausing effective targeted chaos to induce full true majority complacency as the point of original entry, and then while in power focus attention on dismantling democratic institutions and the rule of law to remain in power in case they fail to sustain effective targeted chaos permanently,,,and normal democratic thinking keep making the original mistake since 2016 UK, THINKING THEY ARE COMPETING AGAINST ANOTHER NORMAL DEMOCRATIC OUTCOME,,,And issue I am addressing currently systematically with my series RETHINKING DEMOCRACY....

I enjoy your perspectives.

Dear Seda H. Bostancı

Thanks for the opportunity!

It seems you’re expressing a mix of views about Tommy Robinson, Sharia law, and interpretations of Islam. It’s important to consider that discussions around these topics can be complex and sensitive, with a range of perspectives.

Tommy Robinson is a controversial figure who has been involved in discussions around immigration, Islam, and free speech, and opinions about him are deeply divided. Supporters often view him as someone standing up for free expression and safety, while critics accuse him of promoting Islamophobia and division.

Regarding Sharia law, it’s essential to recognize that interpretations of Sharia can vary widely among Muslims around the world. Many view it as a guiding framework for ethical and moral conduct, while others associate it with more extreme interpretations that can lead to harmful practices.

It’s crucial Fatema Miah to differentiate between the actions of individuals or groups claiming to represent a religion and the beliefs of the broader community. Many Muslims advocate for peace, understanding, and coexistence, emphasizing that the actions of extremists do not reflect their faith.

Engaging in constructive dialogue and seeking common ground can help bridge divides and foster understanding among diverse perspectives.

The notion of a unified world underpinned by industrial primacy while sidelining commercial interests poses profound questions about the future of global cooperation, the balance of power, and the potential for conflict in an increasingly multipolar world. The outcomes of these dynamics could reshape international relations and influence economic models for decades to come.

The transition from the U.S.-Soviet rivalry to what you're describing as the "era of the Warring States" reflects a complex geopolitical landscape characterized by fragmented power dynamics and the rise of emerging economies. In this new world order, traditional superpower rivalries have given way to a multipolar framework where various nations pursue their own interests, often leading to competition and conflict.

In this context, the concept of a country prioritizing industrial development while suppressing commercial interests can be interpreted through the lens of nationalism and state-driven economic models.

Nations that prioritize heavy industrialization and seek to centralize control over their economies may aim for self-sufficiency and greater global influence. These countries might invest heavily in technology, infrastructure, and human capital, viewing industrial prowess as a means to enhance their international standing and attract global partnerships.

This approach might involve limiting foreign competition, protecting domestic industries, and implementing policies that favor state-owned enterprises or public-private partnerships. By doing so, these nations could aim to create a strong internal market that fosters economic growth and innovation.

As countries pursue industrialization aggressively, the potential for conflict increases. Nations might compete for resources, markets, and influence, leading to tension and rivalry. This competition can manifest in trade wars, military conflicts, or ideological clashes.

In this scenario, countries like China or India could be viewed as potential unifiers in a fragmented global landscape. Their large populations, growing economic clout, and strategic initiatives (like China's Belt and Road Initiative) reflect attempts to assert influence over global trade routes and bolster their geopolitical interests.

The rapid advancement of technology can serve as both a catalyst for industrialization and a factor that disrupts traditional commerce. Innovations in automation, artificial intelligence, and manufacturing processes may allow nations to achieve unprecedented levels of productivity, potentially reshaping global supply chains and economic relationships.

Good morning Harry, thank you for writing. The reasons you provide justifying silence of the part of scientists have merits as they are direct or indirect pressures, be it professional, economic, and political, which is why the world needs now more than ever INDEPENDENT SCIENTISTS so that the record of the history of economic thought and development does not leave out the fact that since 1987 WCED we started a process of trying to manage sustainability problems instead of fixing the root cause creating then with continued with UNCSD 2012 Rio + 20 conference where instead of creating and implementing green markets they continue with the ideas of managing the consequences of environmentally distorted traditional markets, a green market paradigm avoidance process that continues today 2024...

Harry, you may appreciate the following set of articles written with a simple goal of pointing out the irony of promoting non-science based ideas to solve sustainability problems as science based.

SuSustainability thought 170: What happens to the Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm evolution loop under willful academic blindness? What are the implications of this?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364694521_Sustainability_thoughts_143_Pointing_out_the_different_roads_towards_sustainability_markets_when_placing_the_traditional_market_model_of_Adam_Smith_under_the_Thomas_Kuhn's_paradigm_transformation_loopstainability thought 170: What happens to the Thomas Kuhn’...

Some may be interested in the food for thoughts found in this article, related to the question:

Some may be interested in the food for thoughts found in this article, related to the question:

Some may be interested in the food for thoughts found in this article, related to the question:

Some may be interested in the food for thoughts found in this article, related to the question:

Elections are about filling offices (parliamentary and executive). People and parties filling those offices grow stale or show their competence or otherwise; and other potential officials and parties appear.

So yes, we want them to be accountable to regular (re)election !

A referendum in contrast is issue deciding. Usually either binding (eg constitutional amendment) or at least of such social importance as to warrant the cost of referring to the whole electorate. So referendums are more like a significant bill or motion in a legislature.

Some legislatures prevent a bill, once defeated, being put back to a vote in the same session of parliament. Eg the UK Commons has that rule. But a 'session' is eg just one year.

So yes there is good reason to debate about why a narrow referendum result should 'shut down' an issue for a generation. The rationale is often said to be something like the legal rule of 'stare decisis': where an apex court will not re-hear the same matter for many years after a key decision. That analogy is inexact, as the deliberative nature of judging is sprinkled with the idea that the judges are unearthing the 'best' deep principle to resolve the matter.

A more political analogy is with a contentious social issue under a bill of rights (eg abortion in USA). There the best explanation for not 're-rolling the dice' regularly is that the decision should settle the issue, to allow society to move on. A similar idea of 'finis litium' (battles over law should have an end) lies behind avoiding repeat referendums.

Ghalib, good day. Thank you for taking the time to write. If you take the time to read the article shared above you can support your comments with academic facts, the most important part of this question is WHY?; and you can use that framework to articulate the why.

I appreciate the time taken to comment;

Lucio

You may find the following article interesting

You may find the following article interesting

You may find the following article interesting

You may find the following article interesting

By distinguishing between Zionist and Jewish people

Demeter gets my vote. De-meter. The mother. She is goddess of earth's fertility, distinct from Athena, goddess of "wisdom" as practiced by warrior Athenians. (Athena's also goddess of war, as is evident from the helmet she wears, and her spear). Athena is no sweetie pie. She's a virgin (anti-fertility?) obedient to her father-mother Zeus, from whose "mind" she was born, via another godly act of parthenogenesis. Demeter is a much more "measured" goddess, as are the seasons she is linked to "naturally."

Apollo also does not get my vote, despite his priestly philosophical posturing. He's a killer of the feminine in nature (Python, symbol of primitive female), and one thing he doesn't really want to discuss (or perhaps know about himself) is his 19 episodes with lover boys. Yes, boys. Not men.

It's all very...complex....

Maybe you can find some Objectivists willing to engage with you at this site: https://forum.objectivismonline.com/index.php?/portal/

The Stroop Effect, illustrating how conflicting information can delay cognitive processing, is evident in today's culture through various means. In advertising, brands use color-text discrepancies to capture attention and aid memorability. Digital interfaces leverage color-coding for user guidance, where unexpected combinations can cause confusion. Educational tools incorporate Stroop-like tasks to enhance cognitive skills, while traffic and safety signals rely on intuitive color-text alignment to ensure quick, accurate responses. Additionally, psychological assessments use Stroop tasks to evaluate cognitive function, demonstrating the effect's relevance in both practical applications and scientific research.

Sure, if Jesus had come as a billomaire, salvation would have been for the rich and not for all. Alexander Ohnemus

Your project presents a comprehensive exploration of the concept of reincarnation, blending insights from various disciplines including philosophy, hard sciences, engineering, and softer sciences. The structured approach, delineated in the table of contents, facilitates a thorough examination of the topic, guiding readers through different layers of analysis.

However, it's crucial to ensure that each section contributes cohesively to the overarching argument. While the incorporation of differential equations adds an intriguing dimension to the discourse, it's essential to elucidate its relevance and application within the context of reincarnation.

Moreover, attributing the belief in reincarnation solely to white supremacy is a bold assertion that warrants meticulous substantiation. Providing concrete evidence and nuanced reasoning to support this claim will enhance the credibility of your argument and foster deeper engagement with your thesis.

Furthermore, the inclusion of suggestions for fostering social justice through specific metaphysical frameworks, such as a Universalist Christian Heaven, adds depth to the discussion. Nonetheless, ensuring clarity and feasibility in implementing these suggestions will be paramount for their effectiveness.

Overall, your project exhibits a commendable interdisciplinary approach and ambitious scope. By refining your argumentation, providing robust evidence, and ensuring clarity in your proposals, you can elevate the discourse and foster meaningful dialogue on the improbable belief in reincarnation and its societal implications.

Yes

According to different sources consulted, Niccolò Macchiavelli was an Italian philosopher, politician, and writer born in Florence on May 3, 1469. He is often accused of being cynical, but his legacy in political history is significant. Let's look at some key aspects:

1. Political Realism: Machiavelli emphasized the importance of state stability and the need to understand politics as it was, not as it should be. His work "The Prince" is a treatise on power and governance, where he argues that leaders must make pragmatic decisions based on reality, even if that involves morally questionable actions.

2. The End Justifies the Means: Machiavelli maintained that, in politics, the end justifies the means. Leaders must be willing to take drastic measures if it benefits the state or the ruler. This idea has influenced political leaders and theorists throughout the centuries, although it has also been very controversial.

3. His Role in History: Machiavelli was an official of the Florence Republic and held the second chancellor position. Despite not always being successful in politics, he managed to reconquer Pisa in 1509, a vital port for the Florentine republic.

In short, Machiavelli was a keen observer of human nature and a defender of political realism. His legacy endures in political thought and continues to be the subject of study and debate today.

god means a set of good qualities if you have a patience courage responsibility you can see god in your near about

I don't see a question, but there is a relevant observation to be made: Dealing only with genetics any black or white males are closer than any male and female. By the way, the color pigeonhole society employs are simplistic to the point of stupidity. 'Whites' are pink, not white unless they happen to be albinos. 'Blacks' are almost always some shade of brown,and Asians have a remarkable range of color tones.

could you pls explain it in a little more detail -- what exactly is meant by the last derivative?

I don't think we can answer this question.

We don't know why the word "TO" is all uppercase.

We probably can think of novels, movies, stories, stage plays, children's book, where "Don';t look suspicious" is actually written. We need more detail about the conditions that it is "unwritten."

Subvert what?

"Get destroyed" sounds like a conflict between active antagonists and protagonists, but you've presented it in passive voice, so nobody can actually interpret what you mean.

Please rewrite and resubmit.

Partiendo desde.el concepto mismo de izquierda y su presencia en el mundo moderno ,global y tecnológico tendríamos que sugerir que ya no podría ser usada como tal si no con algunos cambios estructurales para que pueda ser.aceptado como tal ,el pensar como antes ya no aplica a.estos tiempos la izquierda no está bien vista en estos tiempos tiene que cambiar su concepto radical y ser flexible ya que de no ser así estaría.condemada a desaparecer , adaptarse a tiempos donde el crecimiento económico de los países son prioridad y que debe de.mantenerse un equilibrio para brindar mejores servicios a los ciudadanos por parte del estado son manejos de gobierno , es en este punto donde la riqueza de los países debe de ajustarse para que el ciudadano pueda sentir que si estado se preocupa hace cosas como disminución de las.brechas sociales ,pero si no lo hace solo logrará descontento y esto genera rechazo por parte de la.poblacion ,considero que loas.dificil es.ser justo sobre todo porque nunca se está conforme con lo que se brinda.como estado

What could your "political inclinations" possibly have to do with the scientific issues discussed on this website?

That modern liberalism will still dominate in the US does not mean the country is getting it right globally. The country's think-tanks must learn to work with the aphorism that says :

"We must change with the changing times". Modern liberalism has dented America's image in the international arena and created for her more enemies.

Dear Alexander, my long-term researches on original Strategic Self-Management enables to conclude:

Many thanks, for your points and contributions to this discussion!

If someone will moderate then we could have a more formal debate about political persuasions.

Trust in various aspects of life can be subjective and context-dependent. Each of the mentioned elements has its own considerations:

Ultimately, trust is a nuanced concept influenced by personal experiences, evidence, and individual judgment. It's essential to assess each situation independently and be mindful of potential variations and uncertainties.

Robert, thank you for taking the time to write.

This is an academic question, not a political one: your description of the canadian problem in your view is the same as the description of the problem by holders of exism views like in the USA, Brazil, UK, Italy, Argentina,.,,,, My work explains how exism movements can come out of liberal democracies and how they can come to exist and persist or the condition needed for then to fade away.... From 2016 Brexit and 2016 USEXIT/Trumpism to the present, the expectations documented in my work seem to be consistent with the coming and goings of exism movements that come from majority rule liberal democratic thinking under independent rule of law rule.

Not to desviate, Robert, Do you have a view on the answer to this specific question: When can permanent authoritarianism take hold under majority rule liberal democracies?

As all of you may know, we can take the experience of Trumpism(November 2016-January 2021) in the USA to explore questions such as when a democratic contest can lead to partial and permanent authoritarianism. The failure of the USEXIT/Trumpism to persist by losing reelection means that we just witness temporary authoritarianism, but it could have been worse as one more step was needed to move towards permanent authoritarianism in the USA and the lost of the most relevant normal democratic system in the world. Which raises the question, When can permanent authoritarianism take hold under majority rule liberal democracies?. Any ideas about what the missing step was to transition from temporary to permanent authoritarianism in the USA in 2020. Feel free to share your ideas.

Respectfully yours;

Lucio

As for the critical point in maintaining conditions favorable for life on Earth, it is possible that it has already been exceeded. The idea that a larger community, or even all people on Earth, will come to a common conclusion and make politically effective decisions that something needs to be stopped and something needs to be started on a global scale is fundamentally wrong, because people are not capable of overcoming the currently existing political structures. The decisions you wrote about could only be made by people in power and in the event of a disaster that directly threatens them. But by then, of course, it will be much too late to avoid it. What is the deepest motivation of people in power is the desire to gain and maintain it, and not some common good serving all people in a given community, in a given country, or around the world. So there is no hope for the future for us, because decisions about arming and preparing for further wars have already been made and the current political structures are capable of doing so. And they are not suitable for actions, at least on a similar scale, to save the natural environment on Earth. I don't know what we should do in this situation. Protests and appeals to politicians do not work. The world is ruled by people like Putin or not much better.

ZJ

All my best wishes Sir!

Surely, the relations with the Russian side or affiliated with them have to be neglected and cut down.

It is not appropriate for scientific journals and publishers to involve themselves in political matters. As scientific publishing is expected to be impartial and objective, it is not acceptable for publishers to take sides in any political conflict. Such actions can undermine the credibility of the scientific community and compromise the integrity of the publishing process. Scientific research and publishing should be based solely on the principles of academic merit and peer review, and should not be influenced by political considerations. It is important to maintain fair play principles and adhere to ethical standards in all aspects of scientific research and publishing.

The United Kingdom does not have a formal leadership role within the Commonwealth of Nations, commonly known as the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth is an association of 54 member countries, including the United Kingdom, that are predominantly former territories of the British Empire. Each member country is considered equal and sovereign, with no hierarchical structure or formal leadership.

However, the British monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II, holds a symbolic role as the Head of the Commonwealth. This role is largely ceremonial and represents the historical connection between the member countries and the British Empire. The Head of the Commonwealth does not have any direct political power or authority over the member countries.

In terms of political, cultural, commercial, and touristic relations, the Commonwealth provides a platform for member countries to engage in various forms of cooperation and collaboration. It promotes dialogue, shared values, and mutual understanding among member nations. The Commonwealth offers opportunities for diplomatic exchanges, trade agreements, cultural exchanges, and other forms of engagement.

While the United Kingdom does not have a formal leadership position within the Commonwealth, it holds influence as one of its prominent members. The UK often plays an active role in Commonwealth activities and initiatives, and its historical ties and global standing contribute to its influence within the organization.

It's important to note that the Commonwealth is an evolving organization, and the dynamics of its interrelation in political, cultural, commercial, touristic, and other senses can vary over time and depend on the specific circumstances and priorities of the member countries involved.

Plants can be destructive too. For example, an invasive plant species may be introduced by seeds in bird droppings with the result that a waterway may become choked off. Or an invasive plant may force out a native species that provided better protection against erosion. Such possibilities could have deleterious effects on local ecosystems.

Dear David, I provided you my definitions so as to share the ideas behind the question to help you provide your view/answer to the current questions, NOT to comment on the concepts: Should woke populations under majority rule be expected to tend towards a more perfect democracy through time? yes, why you think so? No, what you think so?

Dear Omobhene, thank you for taking the time to write.

If you know the core values of normal liberal democracies you can find the core values of extreme liberal democracies/EXISM MOVEMENTS just by inverting them, which means that they are the inverse opposite, which explains why the competition between normal democratic outcomes and extreme democratic outcomes during election or reelection may not follow traditional prediction tools.

So inversion provides the link normal liberal democracy vrs extreme liberal democracy and this give you an idea about the expected antidemocracy front and the expected anti-exism front, but not many politicians know that yet.

The site's question format has a severe word limit and the description space beneath a questions risks boring folks if it is too long, so thanks Brett A. Diaz for providing fuller context-setting beyond the complete sentences I provided.

However, the claim that we are confronted with, as you say, "a continuity of a principle, not direct contradiction" is quite contentious.

Do we really want to say that the fallacy of two-wrongs-make-a-right reasoning is admissible/permissible temporarily, until we (somehow and at some undefined point) deem that one particular wrong disappears? Can we not see how dangerous -- and self-defeating -- such an exemption for the sake of utopia is?

Of course, to see those dangers, one must have some familiarity with history. As the historian Niall Ferguson explains, to understand the human condition, one must broaden one's window beyond the 7% slice of humanity that is currently alive:

Even comedians can see the parallels between today's social justice militant mob hysteria and past atrocities:

Our best story-tellers have a clearer grasp than our academics that two wrongs don't make a right. When Batman resolves to combat the bad guys in, the first thing he does is toss his gun a river: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U45yQGwFmqQ

Heeding that moral, I submit that, if one truly resolves to fight evil, one resolves to never do the very evil one purports to fight.

Show what you do and I shall tell you what you truly believe...

Dear Dr.Taher,

People today expect cities to be livable, cultural hubs with sustainable lifestyles. Interest in urban planning and development is growing in this setting. This curiosity has given rise to a new perspective on the goals and operations of cities. Cities should be enjoyed more as "culture havens" than as just places to live. To fulfill these desires, cities can be developed and renewed through cultural planning. Cultural planning has been a concept for more than 30 years, and many city planners are familiar with it. The goal is to involve locals in the planning process of how they want their cities to be, rather than just creating spaces where people can display art or host other cultural activities. Speaking with residents of the city or region where cultural planning will begin will help with this. In order to better understand the local cultural environment, this fosters cooperation between local residents and communities. Urban social innovation strategies, among other things. Interactions between citizens and cities are at the heart of everything. All members of a community will participate in the development of their city under this model, but the process will mostly be cultural rather than political. In order to improve living conditions, people from various political perspectives can come together. This actually occurs, and individuals have come together at the local level in their desire to better people's quality of life.

“Simply expanding reading resources is not enough,” write psychologists Sakshi Ghai, Lee de-Wit and Yan Mak after they revealed a striking lack of voices from under-represented groups and regions in their university’s undergraduate psychology reading material. The team has four recommendations for others wanting to do similar audits: tailor the definition of diversity to your field, start by dissecting the curriculum’s foundational courses, gather diversity data while remaining aware of its limits, and place people from minority ethnic groups at the heart of the audit...

I posted this question after reading the fascinating account of Dilke's career by Roy Jenkins, Sir Charles Dilke: A Victorian Tragedy, because I saw that a number of researchers on RG had posted material about Dilke. Is there no current interest in the Dilke issue?

Yusuf, if you look at exism movements from the point of view of an paradigm shift from normal democratic outcomes to extreme democratic outcomes you need an outside the box thinking model to solve the problem of the paradigm shift knowledge gap created, you need new concepts/ideas no found in dictionaries that how the growth of knowledge works if you remember thomas kuhn's paradigm evolution loop.

If you know what exism movements are you can point out to the answer without looking at the specific concepts.

What is your view on the answer to the question?

In the United States, another culture war is flaring up around encyclopedias.

Under pressure from liberal activists, the popular Merriam-Webster dictionary changed the definition of a woman. This is now an individual who has the opposite gender identity of a male.

By itself, characterization through negation is already original. It cannot be determined otherwise in the era of the deconstruction of the cultural foundations of society. No wonder even Biden's candidate for the Supreme Court at the hearing stated that she was not a biologist - and therefore did not know who women were.

Another war has unfolded around the term “recession”. Wikipedia began to feverishly make changes, until they completely removed the presence of two consecutive quarters with a fall in the economy from the definition of a recession. Just to help Biden deny the fact that the US economy has already fallen into recession for a longer time.

This kind of Orwellianism - with the twisting of the most basic concepts - will become more and more as we continue to be dragged into the abyss of the cultural revolution.

For starters, let's call social justice what it really is: activism. Activism should never be the goal of a university. Now, that is not to say that activism has no place in the academic community, but it should never be the goal of a university.

The primary reason social justice should not be the goal of a university is because it is motivated by ideology, not understanding. The moment an educational institution shifts it's focus from truth to ideology, we've effectively transitioned from education to indoctrination.

In my humble opinion , due to its accountability, a democratic government is superior than other types of governments. The quality of decisions is enhanced by democracy. A way to resolve conflicts and differences is provided by democracy. The dignity of citizens is increased by democracy.

Regards

Student unions the world over have often been a political force to be reckoned with – not least when the core issue at stake is the cost of higher education. In 2010, for example, the UK's National Union of Students managed to rally tens of thousands of students on to the streets in opposition to the Westminster governments plans to triple tuition fees in England while other countries – such as South Africa – have also seen their fair share of protests over fees from student groups. However, these days some student unions seem mired in an endless culture war stand-off with minsters over free speech, while in the UK and elsewhere others are questioning whether the shift of student interest towards single-issue campaigning has made such organisations irrelevant...

🥰🥰🥰ok

Big Data platforms allow government agencies to access large volumes of information that are essential for their daily operations. With real-time access, governments can identify areas that require attention, make better and more timely judgments about how to proceed, and enact the necessary changes.

Lucio Muñoz H.G. Callaway ,

Lucio Muñoz , I would like to correct your impression, as follows: "If she would have thought that my answer was lacking, she would have said so including why she thought my answer was lacking so I have the change to reply, but she did not say so…

For academics, this leaves a somewhat-muddied role in society and students' lives. As a student, an academic is not only a mentor but a guide through the various areas of our subjects of study, and this often means working with material typically seen as less pertinent to current society.

Hi Dr Zin Mar Khing . Since politics is taught in universities and colleges then it is a science by itself . So anything from politics especially the questions should be treated scientifically to have the best results .

The SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic has changed a lot in our daily functioning. The pandemic increased the scale of digitization and Internetisation of remote communication, economic and other processes. The pandemic gave hope for an increase in the scale of implementation of the sustainable development goals, for an increase in the general social awareness of pro-environmental and acceleration of the pro-environmental transformation processes of the classic economy to a sustainable, green circular economy. Unfortunately, not much has changed in this regard so far. On the other hand, people will follow the rules and recommendations of anti-pandemic and sanitary safety to a greater extent. The pandemic also changes the sectoral structure of the economy, because during the pandemic, some companies and enterprises operating in some, mainly service sectors of the economy, recorded a decrease in revenues from the sale of services and / or products, and others, operating mainly in some production sectors of the economy, recorded an increased interest of customers in their offer. and profit growth.

Greetings,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I fully agree and support the opinions of colleagues Janet Lane, Chinaza Godswill Awuchi. Thank you so much!

With the departure of Donald Trump, new president has entered the Paris climate agreement.

An Augustinian monk, the Austrian Abbot Gregor Mandel (1822-1884) found time beyond his spiritual and administrative duties - admittedly with the help of assistants - to devote himself to the study of botany, especially peas. Forgotten for a long time - fame and recognition came long after his death -, even because of the discrediting of some of the results of his research, today he is considered the father of "genetics".

Since Bertolt Brecht was a self-professed Marxist, he would probably have been pleased with contemporary world politics today!

Thanks; I agree with you, we need to leave here.

Have a nice evening.

Mohamed

Characteristic postmodern society information capitalist economy that is, the so-called speculative economy which is imbued with neoliberal ideology whereby most states democratic arranged except the USA where liberal is present politically arranging. A society in which we live it is also post-industrial in which agriculture and industry are losing the role they once had. In fact, not correct to say that these two sectors go out, but the service sector has already gained importance in which it opens a vast number of jobs, while in the previous two we have a considerable reduction of the same. Economic globalization enabled the transfer of production units from developed countries to underdeveloped countries where employees do the same job as their colleagues for 8 to 10 times fewer wages. Globalization processes have affected all world societies, not only society Western Europe and the US but also the rest of the world.

I believe the 2019-2021 timeframe is enough. The legal framework must provide efficacious procedures and remedies for protecting electoral rights at all stages, including voter registration, parties and candidates, resource allocation and access to the media, campaign activities, voting, counting, tabulating and declaring results.

Sharing here final draft of paper about the 2016-2020 rise and fall of Trumpism using the thinking of the road from normal liberal democracies to permanent authoritarianism from within, it has some good food for thoughts: