Science topics: LinguisticsPhonology
Science topic
Phonology - Science topic
Phonology is a branch of linguistics concerned with the systematic organization of sounds in languages.
Questions related to Phonology
Journal Manager is seeking editorial board and reviewers to process manuscripts for the journal.
Lisanudhad ISSN: 2356-1998 (P) |2527-6360 (E) is a scientific journal specializing in the Arabic language studies ranging from the Arabic teaching, linguistics and literatures. Lisanudhad seeks theoretically engaged work at the forefront of the field, written for a global audience comprised of the specialist, the researcher, the teachers and the student alike. The Lisanudhad is a scientific journal which focuses on the theme and topic of 1) Arabic Language and its Teaching and 2) Arabic Linguistics and Literature, including:
- Methodology of Arabic teaching for non-native speakers;
- Teaching for Arabic Competences;
- Strategy for teaching and learning Arabic for non-native speakers;
- Models of Arabic teaching for non-native speakers;
- The Technology of Arabic teaching;
- Design of Arabic teaching for non-native speakers;
- Evaluation in Arabic teaching for non-native speakers.
- Arabic Morphology and Syntax;
- Arabic Phonetic and Phonology;
- Arabic Applied Linguistics;
The Journal Manager welcomes you to join us to be Editorial Board or Reviewer of Lisanudhad.
Status : Part time
Working language : Arabic & English
Working style : Internet-based (web: https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/lisanu/about)
Payment : Voluntary job, no payment
This apllication are valid until June 2024. The selected applicant would be contacted by Journal Operational Manager (Haniatul Mabruroh +62 813-2741-5886)
I am going to find out the different approaches and then measure each one effectiveness of teaching alphabet. It would be regarding phonology awareness, phenom learning, and so on.
Are there any notable open-access journals with a rapid review and publication timeline in the field of phonology?
What recent studies have proposed changes to the traditional theory of optimality in phonology?
Is there anyone who could refer me to a phonology research team? I would appreciate any information or advice.
Are there any phonological journals that are Scopus-indexed and well-known for their quick publication?
What are some innovative approaches to data analysis and visualization in phonology research?
What should a researcher do immediately after obtaining a doctorate?
What are the most effective methods and technologies for collecting biological data, such as articulatory movement or vocal tract imaging, to analyze and model the production and perception of phonological features in human speech?
Which evaluation instruments are available for phonological awareness testing?
How are researchers using experimental methods, such as eye-tracking or neuroimaging, to investigate phonological processing and perception?
What are some emerging trends in the application of Praat in phonological research?
How can mathematical modeling and formalism contribute to the development and refinement of phonological theories, such as Optimality Theory or Government Phonology?
Phonetic - What is progressive and regressive assimilation and dissimilation in the Romanic Languages (especially Spanish) and how do you recognize it? Was ist progressive und regressive Assimilation und Dissimilation in den Romanischen Sprachen, besonders im Spanischen? Que es la asimilación progresiva y regresiva y la disimilación fonética en las lenguas románicas (especialmente en el español)?
I am searching for an explication, a good source recommendation, where I could read more about this topic and some examples for the assimilation or dissimilation in the romanic languages, especially in the Spanish language. Thank you for helping me!!
Use illustrations and examples to discuss this assumption.
Use illustrations and examples to discuss this assumption.
It seems that to date, there is not solid evidence for parallel phonological processing reflected by phonological POF effects. Why?
As a doctoral student specializing in phonology, I want to know the most important and newest theories in my field, and then try to apply it on Arabic language and other languages.
Thank you to everyone who participated in answering my question.
I am working on loan phonology. I am particularly interested in the morphophonological features/structures of English loanwords in Yoruba, especially within Optimality Theory (OT).
Studying one of the varieties of Persian, it is assumed that, regardless of the stress position, all the short (mono-moraic) vowels are reduced to schwa in all of the open syllables. More clearly, all long (bi-moraic) vowels are kept intact and the short vowels have a surface representation only if they are the nucleus of closed syllables. Has any research provided any evidence of a language or a variety which can fit a similar phonological pattern?
Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Dear Friends,
Greeting.
Happy New Year. I wish everybody a prosperous New Year.
I'm thinking of a project for checking the sound (phonetics) that will lost or promoted while switching from one set of alphabet to another. For example switching from Arabic letters to Latin in Turkey; does the set of Latin letters saved all Turkish phonetics (sound)? What is the advantages and/or disadvantages of such switching?
Did such work carried out anywhere?
Best Regards,
ABDUL-SAHIB
In most of the existing cotton crop simulation models, the phenological events or developmental rate processes are not parameterized as a function of CO2. I wanted to investigate this since it will impact model results in case if the phonology is affected by atmospheric CO2 levels.
My two favourite courses are Phonetics and Phonology and General Linguistics with its other interrelated sub-divisions. I have been teaching them for over 35 years.
can anyone tell me which part of cognitive phonology is suitable and rich enough to be used as a sample for a descriptive analytic study?
I was trying to determine whether there are differences in the frequencies of words (lemmas) in a given language corpus starting with the letter K and starting with the letter M. Some 50 000 words starting with K and 54000 words starting with M altogether. I first tried using the chi-square test, but the comments below revealed that this was an error.
I am asking for the new trends in writing researches in English phonology.
I seek your guidance on the methodology that I should use to collect, analyse and document false friends. My research concerns false cognates in Lusoga and Luganda.
This is so far the procedure I was trying upon and then I couldn't fix it
As per my understanding here some definitions:
- lexical frequencies, that is, the frequencies with which correspondences occur in a dictionary or, as here, in a word list;
- lexical frequency is the frequency with which the correspondence occurs when you count all and only the correspondences in a dictionary.
- text frequencies, that is, the frequencies with which correspondences occur in a large corpus.
- text frequency is the frequency with which a correspondence occurs when you count all the correspondences in a large set of pieces of continuous prose ...;
You will see that lexical frequency produces much lower counts than text frequency because in lexical frequency each correspondence is counted only once per word in which it occurs, whereas text frequency counts each correspondence multiple times, depending on how often the words in which it appears to occur.
When referring to the frequency of occurrence, two different frequencies are used: type and token. Type frequency counts a word once.
So I understand that probably lexical frequencies deal with types counting the words once and text frequencies deal with tokens counting the words multiple times in a corpus, therefore for the last, we need to take into account the word frequency in which those phonemes and graphemes occur.
So far I managed phoneme frequencies as it follows
Phoneme frequencies:
Lexical frequency is: (single count of a phoneme per word/total number of counted phonemes in the word list)*100= Lexical Frequency % of a specific phoneme in the word list.
Text frequency is similar but then I fail when trying to add the frequencies of the words in the word list: (all counts of a phoneme per word/total number of counted phonemes in the word list)*100 vs (sum of the word frequencies of the targeted words that contain the phoneme/total sum of all the frequencies of all the words in the list)= Text Frequency % of a specific phoneme in the word list.
PLEASE HELP ME TO FIND A FORMULA ON HOW TO CALCULATE THE LEXICAL FREQUENCY AND THE TEXT FREQUENCY of phonemes and graphemes.
This is so far the procedure I was trying upon and then I couldn't fix it
As per my understanding:
- lexical frequencies, that is, the frequencies with which correspondences occur in a dictionary or, as here, in a word list;
- lexical frequency is the frequency with which the correspondence occurs when you count all and only the correspondences in a dictionary.
- text frequencies, that is, the frequencies with which correspondences occur in a large corpus.
- text frequency is the frequency with which a correspondence occurs when you count all the correspondences in a large set of pieces of continuous prose ...;
You will see that lexical frequency produces much lower counts than text frequency because in lexical frequency each correspondence is counted only once per word in which it occurs, whereas text frequency counts each correspondence multiple times, depending on how often the words in which it appears to occur.
When referring to the frequency of occurrence, two different frequencies are used: type and token. Type frequency counts a word once.
So I understand that probably lexical frequencies deal with types counting the words once and text frequencies deal with tokens counting the words multiple times in a corpus, therefore for the last, we need to take into account the word frequency in which those phonemes and graphemes occur.
So far I managed phoneme frequencies as it follows
Phoneme frequencies:
Lexical frequency is: (single count of a phoneme per word/total number of counted phonemes in the word list)*100= Lexical Frequency % of a specific phoneme in the word list.
Text frequency is similar but then I fail when trying to add the frequencies of the words in the word list: (all counts of a phoneme per word/total number of counted phonemes in the word list)*100 vs (sum of the word frequencies of the targeted words that contain the phoneme/total sum of all the frequencies of all the words in the list)= Text Frequency % of a specific phoneme in the word list.
PLEASE HELP ME TO FIND A FORMULA ON HOW TO CALCULATE THE LEXICAL FREQUENCY AND THE TEXT FREQUENCY of phonemes and graphemes.
I need research material on Brazilian Portuguese phonology.
I am looking for a good journal with sufficient ranking level for publishing a paper on a dialectology phonological processes. Can any one suggest me a good journal?
a phonological
i am working on the phonological system of a language and now i want to analyze the phonology of this language using Autosegmental and Lexical phonological framework . if there is anybody who can help that would be appriciated.
Some language learners believe that some languages are too hard to learn due to their sound system (phonetics and phonology). Which language, do you think, is the most difficult one for learners, and why?
Hi there,
Me and my colleague are interested in developing experimental tasks to investigate lexical access in bilinguals speaking French and Turkish. We thus wonder if a Turkish lexical database exists in order to select materials according to lexical frequencies, phonological and orthographical neighborhood of words.
We know about "TELL project" but it does not provide the information we need.
We will be very grateful for your precious help.
Best regards.
Stéphanie Bellocchi
I have this project for school with my students and we are trying to create a list of the non-native accents in English that are the most difficult to understand (by natives or non natives). In other words, I'm trying to establish if it is English spoken in France, Poland, or Liberia etc. Also, what are the deviant phonological features that make comprehension more difficult? (other than word stress on the wrong syllable). If anyone has thoughts or knows a study regarding these topics, I would be very glad to hear about it. Thanks for your help!
English phonetics and phonology
I am a student of Comparative Literature (Persian and English) and I am reading about the prosody of the English language. To master its metrical system and prosody, I think I should read more about the English phonetics more in the first place. So I would be extremely grateful if you recommend any advanced book on this subject.
To study the phonological processing abilities with non-word repetition task in children who stutter, we performed three non-word repetition tasks in two groups of children who stutter and who don't stutter. Responses from the nonword repetition task were scored into two different methods in below:
First, the per cent correct nonwords were scored based each nonword as a correct or error response.
Second, the overall per cent correct phonemes (the total number of phonemes that were correctly produced in each nonword divided by the total number of phonemes ∗ 100).
Each of these tasks has been made taking into account some of the factors affecting the non-word repetition performance. Each of these assignments includes sub-scales (one to five syllable). The aims of our study were:
1) To compare the performance of the two groups in three tasks to identify the task that distinguishes better between the two groups.
2) To identify items from each sub-scale for each task that could better differentiate between the two groups and put them in the form of a non-word repetition list.
I want to know which statistical methods I should use. Please guide me about the above issues.
I need an explanation of the Optimality Theory and hw I can use it as a framework for my study of the phonological features of Swazi English.
I need information on the Optimality Theory and how I can use it as a framework for my research on the phonological features of Swazi English. Can anyone recommend sites/ sources where I can get information on OT.
Do you know any implication research studies on American Sign Language phonological alterations on lexicon of "1st-person" or "self-possession"?
(Ex: Me, I, and We)
I am working on a paper trying to investigate the advisability of using animated charts in teaching phonetics and phonology for non-native speakers of English.
Hello,
Any article recommendations on Spanish learners of Russian, particularly — the acquisition of the Russian sound system?
In English, AdSD is characterized by hyperadduction during phonation on vowels. AbSD, is characterized by prolonged voiceless consonants before vowel onset.
Also the perceptual quality of SD in English is different than French perceptual qualities as you will find in the Pearlmann-Lorch & Whurr 2009 study.
I was wondering if you found any differences in perceptual qualities or specific phonological instances where AdSD symptoms arise during the reading passage in Mandarin? I would really appreciate any feedback since I am assisting a professor with related research and I am trying to look for research that has addressed SD symptoms in other languages. Thank you so much
I am looking for recordings of "The North Wind and the Sun" in Romanian for a research about the phonetics and phonology of this language.
Do you know whether I can find any on the web?
Dr. Mann.
So glad you are working in a school! Your research about morphology and literacy has been an important influence.
While I continue to publish, my main focus is working directly with schools and educators to help them understand English orthography so that they can target that understanding in literacy instruction from the beginning of formal instruction. My 2018 article with my brother, Jeff Bowers (https://tinyurl.com/y9gh6l8e) addresses this issue. Morphology is key, of course, but it's really about the interrelation of morphology, etymology and phonology. The evidence from meta-analyses of morphological instruction is that it brings the greatest benefits to younger and less able students.
However, few have an image of what morphology instruction can look like in early literacy instruction let alone orthographic instruction. I thought you might be interested in
Some practical examples from schools I've been working with. This recent piece shares examples from pre-school to Gr. 2 that may interest you. https://tinyurl.com/y7oan9wz.
If you find that useful, I'd be delighted to discuss any aspect of this kind of instruction further with you. I'm not good at Research Gate. Feel free to email me at peterbowers1@mac.com
You can see the practical work I'm doing at my website www.wordworkskingston.com
Regardless, I'm always excited to see researchers diving into schools!
Phonetics is the science concerned with the study of the sound system in the human language in general. Phonology, however, is the science concerned with the study of the sound system in particular languages. What are the main differences that can be added between the two disciplines?
Hi, I am trying to construct a receptive phonology task (i.e., odd-one-out: "bli" "bli" "bla", which sounded different?) for 3-year old children with various language backgrounds. As I want to compare kids with speaking different languages, I need to construct parallel tests with comparable item difficulty. I have found consonant and vowel confusion matirces for German and French (sadly only adult's data) but not (yet) for Italian and Turkish. Can anyone help me out?
Kind regards,
Jessica
I am interested in investigating the phonological development for children speaking Arabic (Saudi-Hejazi in particular), and I developed a word list to conduct a single naming task on children to have their speech sample. So, do I need to collect some sample from children as connected speech to complete my data and get a full picture of their speech skills? If you think it is important, could I have some references that support this idea?
Thank you.
This article was brought to my attention by my good friend, Firmin Ahoua. Congrats to the authors for this research but they could have done it without framing it as if they found something contrary. In so doing they are being dishonest with their framing of this issue. They refer to my CSLI book the Structure of Dagaare and claim that I say the vowle /a/ is neutral to ATR harmony, but there is nowhere in my book that I say this. On page 23 of my book I acknowledge that /a/ occurs in both + and - ATR. They claim they see variants of /a/ but of course we all who work on vowel harmony systems know that as this low vowel is influenced by its ATR environment in each phonological word. So I really find the contestation here dishonest. It looks like an attempt to embellish their finding to sound as if it is a breakthrough but they are only providing evidence through instrumental analysis (which was not available in earlier studies) to confirm what myself and others say about ATR harmony in Dagaare and other Mabia languages.
My aim is to morph two sounds (e.g., light-right) so that they become an ambiguous sound (i.e., sometimes you'll hear it as 'right', sometimes 'light').
I have been practicing with a MATLAB based software called STRAIGHT-legacy and have had some success with the coding (non-GUI) side of it. However, there is very limited guidance available online, and I would like some more guidance:
Q1. Preferably, some UG students can use the GUI version of the software. From reading Hideki Kawahara's (2009) manual, this can be done by typing “TandemSTRAIGHThandler” in the Matlab command window (after setting path to src). However, this does not work. Since the manual was written some time ago, I'm wondering if the GUI for morphing is still operational, or has it been phased out? If anyone is still using it successfully, I'd appreciate if you can let me know how you activate it (i.e., which version of STRAIGHT did you download, and what version of MATLAB do you use?)
Q2. There are still some minor aspects of the coding interface I have trouble with, too. If anyone has experience of using STRAIGHT for morphing, please get in touch.
Many thanks,
Ryan
Dear Colleagues,
Perhaps you could help me find answers to several questions on the neural organization of alphabet and number recitation:
1. Could recitation of numbers and letters rely on phonological long-term memory without accessing lexical information? Alternatively, could lexical information be accessed only for numbers (since they are words) but not letters (that are not words)?
2. Several neuroimaging studies (including clinical reports) have shown a dissociation between letter and number sequencing (recitation, reading and writing). Why do you think this is the case?
3. A patient could not recite the alphabet but could sing it upon electrical brain stimulation. Any suggestions why this happened?
Help with any of the questions will be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
Monika
The mapping of word-level accentual phenomena and musical prominence and melody in text-setting is well-known. This leads to the question as to whether higher-level prosodic constituents are also mirrored in music, and if so how.
Hello,
I would like to see the full-version of the article " Short-term Memory and Language Processing: Further Evidence for the Existence of Separate Phonological and Semantic Short-term Memory Components " from MAJERUS S., VAN DER LINDEN M. & RENARD C.
Is it possible to publy it ?
Thank you
MINDER Camille
Below are the case:
30 students to answered 4 types of questions : spelling, reading, writing and phonology test. I need to know which instrument is the most correct answered and the most worst instrument? My data have a few outlier due to 0 marks in a few instruments which resulted non-normalize distribution. Therefore I cannot simply use the mean ans the SD as in normal distribution. Then what types of statistical test should I used?
impact of regional prosody on severity and Which parameter varies ?
I suppose impact on prosody on patients living in Aix les Bains is different from Aix en provence, since regional prosody is different...
Thanks for your opinion.
Denis
I'm creating an artificial language that consists of auditorily presented CV nonwords. Because there are not that many CV nonwords that meet my criteria (neither in English nor in German, both of which I've considered using), I was wondering whether I could include letter names along with some actual nonwords.
Is there any evidence (ideally, from EEG/ERP studies, but not necessarily) for letter names (for example, /di/ in English) being processed as real words? My hint is that I shouldn't use them but I'm hoping that perhaps if all my items have an identical phonological structure (i.e., CVs starting with a plosive), and if most of them (~85%) are nonwords, then the letter names (~15%) won't be processed differently compared to the nonwords. I'd be thankful for any advice/references!
early years children researchers
Language learning strategy researchers
Refugee education
We are doing research about a gesture system called Visual Phonics. The hand shapes, corresponding to sounds, can be useful in literacy instruction with young children, both with and without disabilities. The individual hand shapes are fairly abstract initially, but, with repetition, do take on meaning. Does this indicate a shift from one type of gesture to another?
What is assessment for you as a teacher. How do you improve your students learning? Which assessment way do you follow?
Now a days, I'm teaching "literary pedagogy" subject to my BS-4 students. I have prepared a teaching program and have divided my few lectures into two-two phases. In my last class, I involved my students into different works, including group discussion to judge their capacity to work in team, leader participation to judge their role as a leader, written task to evaluate their writing ability and critical thinking.. as well as I focused on their minor grammatical mistakes in writing and speaking etc. After one phase, I gave feedback to the works of my students. I gave them scores on the basis of group discussion, leader participation, individual participation and their critical thoughts.
How do you assess your students' task..
I welcome you to join this discussion and I thank you, in advance for your intellectual contribution.
Best Wishes,
Sabah Zaib
In reading research, a frequently used dependent variable (DV) is the response/reaction time (RT). How sure are that we start uttering the word (thus triggering the response capture device (i.e., mic)) ONLY after accessing the full phonology of the word to be read?!
Or put in simple words, how sure are we that the entire word is processed before we utter the word, in a reading experiment task?!
Regards..
G. Krishnan
The aim of my study was to see the effectiveness of my selected literature teaching method in my classroom. There were 24 students in class so I divided them into four groups of six members each. I narrowed down my purpose and gave to my students several tasks to see the effectiveness of this method with regards to 1. students' creative writing skills 2. their Critical thinking strategy, 3.their other language skills like reading, discussing, 4. and their general opinion about this method. The response of my students are open ended. I first noted down the response of my students collectively with respect to their groups as "Group A said about this method "fantastic", G-B, innovative, etc. I also got their individual responses.
Now the data provides me in-depth knowledge. I'm confused how should I analyse my data systematically.
I need your guidance to analyse and interpret my data.
Thanks in advance.
Mean syllable duration, Number of filled pauses, Number of silent pauses, Mean duration of silent pauses, Number of corrections, and Number of repetitions. I do really need suggestion as I am not sure whether PRAAT can measure all of that. Maybe there are someone who knows well about PRAAT and how to analyze that. I would be very thanksful. Thank you
We are looking for a French text in which speech sounds are selected such as to obtain a fixed proportion of voiced and unvoiced sounds (or more degrees of sonority). This text would we used in a contrastive multilingual experiment on vocal load.
In addition, we are interested in phonetically balanced corpora for French.
Thank you!
I am looking for the frequency average values of RP consonants in order to compare this with the accented English consonants pronounced by the students
Genealogically, some languages may be attributed to a single source referred to as their proto-language. Similarly, dialects of the same language are related in a number of aspects but may differ phonologically.
In my doctoral thesis I am comparing the pronunciation of different types of toponyms in Switzerland. I am wondering whether there is similar research being done in other projects at the moment.
Length, tone and intonation can be distinctively used like phonemes, especially in the African languages. Therefore, they function as phonemes in such languages.
Have asked in Statistical Area. Am interested in identifying probabilistic and statistic distributions of Mandarin tones [either in general or in specific corpora].
I have developed some very general data eg Tone 1 occurs around 18% of the time, Tones 2 and 3 slightly higher than Tone 1, Tone 4 occurs > 40%, and the neutral is relatively low. But I'd like to obtain more detailed data and also theories as to how experts view tones in probability [if this style can even be accomplished]. Would Bayesian probabilities not be appropriate?
Dialect levelling is the phenomenon where there is a loss of localised features in urban and rural variaties of English in Britain, to be replaced with features found over a wider region.
How does one examine whether this has taken place or not, considering only Lexis and Grammar? Extensive research in the past has been done on Accent and Phonology, but Lexical and Grammatical diffusion seem to be overlooked.
I'm working on a research idea related to the mispronunciation of some Arabic words such as "Islam" and "Assalam" by native speakers of English. I noticed that these two words in particular are often mispronounced, especially the syllable -lam which is pronounced as /lɑm/ as explained above instead of /læm/ as in "lamb" which is the closest English equivalent to the native speaker of Arabic's pronunciation of this syllable.
Therefore, I'm trying to trace the syllable /lɑm/ in English to see if it actually exists in the English phonological inventory.
So far I found these results on urbandictionary.com.
UPDATE 11/11/2015: I have found more examples, "llama," "lama (a Buddhist priest of Tibet or Mongolia)," and "Lombard".
Thanks in advance for your help :)
Do neurolinguists have any suggested model for phonological transfer direction ?? I want to know if there is any neurological support for the process through which phonological transfer happens. To be exact i want to know how different parts of brain work when phonological transfer happens?? Any idea? Any model??any sources??
I am working with intonational bilingualism, but I am addressing the linguistic issue in a general way and answers from segmental phonology are welcome:
if on one hand I have a pair of synonymous (due to bilingualism), phonetically similar but phonologically distinct patterns that converge phonetically in a gradient way, creating a continuity of in-between forms without creating new phonological categories (gradent phonetic fudging), thus progressively (in time) eliminating their phonological distinction, and on the other hand I have another synonimous pair which creates a third intermediate fusion-form but also a fusion-category associated to it (phonological discrete fudging), am I allowed to say that (or is there a possible way to assess, and in this case, are there studies assessing whether) the first process is a more "below the level of awareness" than the second one (and therefore, is more bound to result in permanent change)?
Probably the very definition of phonological implies a "more" conscious process, but I mean specific self-awareness tasks, which in intonation may be of the kind "have you said it with an accent?" giving clearly polarized answers in some cases and many "I don't know"s or "sort of"s in others.
Is apraxia of speech (AOS) the same as language delay? and what are the most featured phonological patterns that characterize apraxic people?
Is there a specific battery used to diagnose apraxia of speech? and in case there is not, what are its symptoms?
Given my rudimentary knowledge in phonology, I am somehow struck by this question of phonological rule condensation.
There are three phonological rules:
a. A → B / C__D
b. A → B / __DE
c. A → B / C __E
Now can you help me to collapse these three rules into a single rule schema? I would appreciate your help!
I am currently working on English / Arabic contrastive phonology. I need a tool for doing automatic Arabic speech segmentation. Can you recommend one, please?