Science topic
Personality Traits - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Personality Traits, and find Personality Traits experts.
Questions related to Personality Traits
I recently wrote an article:
What are your thoughts on the subject? Does the area need further investigation? Sometimes I think the psychological aspects are under- investigated in business/entrepreneurial research. Your thoughts? Warm wishes and Happy Easter
Henrik
Dear ResearchGate Community,
I’m Romeo Brancu, a master’s student at the Triagon Business School, and I’m currently researching "the impact of subclinical sadism, transference, and countertransference on executive recruitment processes under German data protection laws".
I’m looking for HR professionals with experience in executive hiring to participate in 60–90 minute interviews. Your expertise will help uncover how subtle personality traits influence recruitment and how HR professionals navigate psychological and legal challenges.
If you’re interested in contributing to this study or would like more details, please contact me at here on ResearchGate, and I will give you all the relevant details.
Your insights will remain confidential and anonymised.
Thank you for supporting academic research!
Best regards,
Romeo Brancu
MBA Candidate
Dear Colleagues,
Professor Tim Bogg and I are currently conducting a meta-analysis evaluating the associations between dietary behaviors and Big Five/Five-Factor personality traits at Wayne State University.
We are seeking relevant unpublished research and conference presentations on this topic, including unpublished data, manuscripts in progress, and/or papers that have been accepted for publication but are not yet in press. Studies that focus on operationally defined “healthy” or “Unhealthy” eating behavior or bivariate correlations between consumption of specific food items (e.g. fruit, meat, sugar) and the Big Five personality traits are welcome!
For inclusion in our meta-analysis…
A measure of the Big Five personality traits was used.
Specific food items or well defined food categories
Correlations for the above relationships should either be reported or be able to be computed.
To submit your work for consideration in our meta-analysis, please email paula.harrison@wayne.edu with (a) either a paper describing the study and its results or your raw data, and (b) the reference for your work.
We greatly appreciate any information you are able to share! Please provide any additional contact information in the event that we may need to ask follow-up questions regarding the characteristics of the sample, your measurement approach, or other methodological factors.
Best,
Paula Harrison, M.A.
Tim Bogg, Ph.D.
According to epistemic virtue theory, a purpose-driven mindset, diligence, cognitive resilience, and related personality traits are considered intellectual values. These psycho-moral virtues, as existential weights, fill the emptiness of a nihilistic life, bringing an empowering sense of joy, inner strength, and unwavering determination. In your perspective, what are intellectual values?
The topic of my study can be described as “Appraisal of Artificial Intelligence: Testing and comparing the relation between hindrance and challenge appraisals with well-being, motivation, and personality traits”. One of my objectives is to create a scale to measure this relation. Where can I find the examples of a scale measuring similar relationships?
Hi! My research partner and I are currently under a lot of pressure right now. We're looking for free personality tests to use in our undergraduate research, short form (must be 35 items and below), can be used for ages 16 and above, and personality traits. Any ideas?
Synopsis: Exploring the Neurological Underpinnings of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) through MRI Scans and Potential Research Opportunities
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) has long been studied as a psychological condition characterized by a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy. However, a growing body of research suggests that there may be a neurological basis for these traits. By comparing MRI and brain scans of individuals diagnosed with NPD to those without the disorder, researchers can potentially uncover structural or functional differences in the brain, contributing to our understanding of the condition. This article aims to explore the current research on the brain's role in NPD, while also proposing future research opportunities that could help clarify whether these differences are present from birth or develop over time, and whether NPD exists on a spectrum.
Current Research on Brain Structure and NPD
Studies that utilize MRI scans and other neuroimaging technologies have begun to reveal insights into the brain abnormalities linked to NPD. Existing research shows that people with NPD often exhibit reduced gray matter in areas of the brain associated with empathy, such as the anterior insula and prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex, which governs decision-making and social behavior, and the insula, which plays a key role in emotional regulation, seem to be less active or underdeveloped in individuals with narcissistic traits. These findings suggest that the difficulties individuals with NPD have in experiencing empathy and remorse may have a biological component.
A 2013 study led by Schulze et al. utilized fMRI scans to observe brain activity in individuals with NPD while they were exposed to emotional stimuli. The results showed less activity in the regions associated with empathy and emotional processing. Additionally, a 2016 study published in *Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment* revealed abnormalities in the structural connectivity between brain regions responsible for emotional regulation and self-referential processing in those with NPD.
Brain Abnormalities or a Continuum?
A critical question is whether these observed neurological differences represent actual brain deformities or exist on a spectrum of personality traits. Some researchers propose that narcissistic traits could lie on a continuum, ranging from healthy narcissism to pathological narcissism, and potentially corresponding to varying levels of brain dysfunction. This would imply that people with subclinical narcissistic traits may share some, but not all, of the brain abnormalities seen in individuals diagnosed with NPD. To understand whether this is a spectrum or a binary distinction, future research should aim to include a wide range of participants with varying levels of narcissistic traits.
The Origins: Nature or Nurture?
One of the most debated aspects of NPD is whether these brain abnormalities are present from birth (nature) or develop because of environmental factors (nurture). Some studies suggest that early childhood experiences, particularly those involving trauma or attachment issues, may influence the development of NPD and its neurological correlates. Future research could focus on longitudinal studies, examining individuals from birth through adulthood to assess whether these brain differences are innate or if they emerge in response to external factors. Genetic studies could also contribute to this understanding by investigating familial patterns of NPD.
Research Opportunities and Future Directions
To push the field forward, more comprehensive studies that utilize a combination of brain imaging, genetic analysis, and psychological assessments are needed. One potential avenue of research could be conducting large-scale studies comparing brain scans of individuals across a spectrum of narcissistic traits, including those diagnosed with NPD, individuals with subclinical narcissistic tendencies, and a control group with no significant narcissistic traits. This could help determine whether certain brain abnormalities exist in a graded fashion.
Additionally, interdisciplinary research could examine the role of early childhood interventions in altering brain development in individuals at risk for NPD. For example, could therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing empathy in early childhood affect the brain regions associated with emotional regulation in narcissists? Finally, machine learning and artificial intelligence could be used to analyze MRI data, potentially identifying patterns that are too subtle for traditional methods to detect.
Conclusion
While research on the brain structure of individuals with NPD is still in its early stages, the data collected so far points to significant neurological differences that may explain some of the hallmark traits of the disorder. Understanding whether NPD exists on a spectrum and whether these brain abnormalities are innate or acquired is crucial for developing new treatment strategies. By combining neuroimaging, psychological assessments, and longitudinal studies, future research can provide deeper insights into the origins and manifestations of NPD, opening up new avenues for prevention and intervention.
If AI can match diseases with corresponding genes, how matchable are the other traits with genes? Why?
I have been going through some ideas that seem to suggest a serious notion that there are some individuated identities in the afterlife. Although I take it serious at times, but I have some problems with this notion because although this notion covers the issue of heaven and hell existence, it however undermines; (a) reincarnation (except one has to accept the change of identity upon decision to come back), (b) the idea of all suffering ending at death (because as 1 person one must be subject to same kind of issues that cause suffering), (c) the idea of falling into nothingness at death which is common in Budhism, and (d) the idea of two personality traits of existence in the afterlife ie that of heavenly saints and hell twigs to burn forever. Perhaps I need some religious fellows to have a deep talk with me
Blessed regards
Mohammed X
I've compiled a database of S&P 1500 firms from 2005-2023, along with a dataset of all quarterly earnings call statements, which I'll analyze using LIWC to measure CEOs' Big Five traits. However, finding or creating high-quality dictionaries for the Big Five personality traits has proven challenging to me.
If anyone is able to send me in the right direction, I would be immensely grateful! Thank you in advance.
We want to conduct exploratory analyses on the influence of personality (Big Five) on health trajectories in humanitarian aid workers. The health trajectories are unevenly distributed with a vast majority of staff being in the healthy trajectory. The internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory is fine and most personality traits correlate significantly with our health outcomes. Yet, the distributions of the personality traits are skewed and have a rather low standard deviation (e.g., agreeableness mean 4.15 out of 5 and SD 0.52). We were wondering if it statistically makes sense to enter these skewed and rather homogeneous data as a covariate in the growth mixture model. I cannot find any information on statistical requirements of covariates for GMMs. Does anyone have information on this or an advice? Thanks!
I'm planning on conducting a research on the correlation between video game dependency and personality traits.
The scale that I use to measure video game dependency gives a dichotomous result of whether or not an individual is likely to be dependent on video games whereas the scale for personality games gives an interval rating as Low, Medium Low, Medium High, or High for each of the 5 personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) separately. I want to explore whether there is any relationship between the two variables: video games and personality.
What statistical test would be most suitable to get the job done?
Thank you.
The study of personality traits has been a prominent area in psychology, and various theories and models have been proposed to understand and categorize these traits. What are these theories?
Hi, we are researching a Comparative Analysis between Personality Traits among Career Interests and Self- determination. We've been trying so hard to find a related literature for personality traits and self-determination. Unfortunately, we still can't find one and we need it. I hope that you can help us thank you so much
Dear friends.
Im setting up an online event on nov 18th where I will talk about personality traits and entrepreneurship. In other words, what makes entrepreneurs different from other people. Is there anyone here who would like to be a participant in a panel discussion? Warm wishes Henrik
We are seeking insights from experts in the field of neuropsychology, traumatic brain injury, and related disciplines to understand the potential influence of personality traits and pre-accident beliefs on the duration of PCS. Specifically, we aim to investigate the relationships between personality traits (such as neuroticism, extraversion, and resilience), pre-accident beliefs (such as perceived vulnerability, self-efficacy, and locus of control), and the severity and duration of PCS symptoms.
Your expertise and perspectives on this topic would be invaluable in enhancing our understanding of the psychological factors that may contribute to prolonged PCS. Additionally, your insights can help guide the development of personalized interventions and treatment strategies targeting specific personality traits and pre-accident beliefs to potentially mitigate the duration of PCS symptoms.
We welcome any contributions, suggestions, or collaboration opportunities to advance our research and improve clinical outcomes for individuals with PCS.
Going with the definition that "Individual differences are the unique characteristics and traits, which distinguish us from others", would you consider sexual orientation an ID? When researching literature connected to the term "individual difference" sexual orientation does not come up very often in my experience. Mostly values, personality, intelligence or temperament. While sexual orientation does fit a broad definition of an ID, it does not seem to be often connected with the term. Do you consider sexual orientation an ID in the same category as personality or intelligence? Is it perhaps related to tradition, that we do not use ID that often as a descriptor of sexual orientation?
To Whom It May Concern
Kindly, if anybody there is interested in collaborating with me as well as other psychology researchers on the topic of personality, please let us know. Right now we are investigating "Narcissistic Personality Traits" in correlation to age, gender, perception, causal attribution, culture, PNI dimensions, etc.
Please, if interested send me/ us a CV to:
I am trying to conduct a replication study (Hierarchical multiple regression), evidently I cant find anything to replicate. (I have found a number of overseas studies or studies involving other demographics).
It appears a gap exists in the literature.
If anyone can find a study for my research I would be much obliged.
In your experience, is it necessary to collect the same data in both measuring points in longitudinal studies and if not, what criteria or reasoning do you follow? For example, if personality traits are considered relatively stable (and present predictors in our models), could we omit them in the second wave?
I'm planning on conducting a linear regression analysis with 5 moderator variables (Big 5 personality traits) but couldn't find any example. I know that it's theoretically possible to include that many moderators, though it would be very helpful to read how other people dealt with it.
Any publication (in any field of research) with more than 2 moderators would be helpful! Thank you :-)
Do you know of any online resources that help with that? Thank you very much in advance!
Influence of personal traits on compliance with COVID restrictions: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Systematic-review-on-the-mediating-role-of-individual-differences-on-COVID-19-guidelines-adherence-in-healthy-populations
Send PM to myself in case of interest
I took up the study of social intelligence. I plan to test its relationship to various personality traits. Also, it is interesting to study social intelligence in different groups of workers. Whoever is interested, let's study it together!
What is measurable impact of the culture on the home environment, that helps in creativity nurturing of a child?
- How does culture affect environmental sustainability?
- How is culture and environment related?
- Is culture an environmental factor?
- How does culture affect or influence an individual?
- Is culture a part of environment?
- Why is culture and environment important?
- What is the impact of culture on society?
- How culture affects the society?
- How does culture affect our behavior?
- CULTURE IS Defined : the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society:" e.g.Afro-Caribbean culture" .
- civilization · society · way of life · lifestyle · customs · traditions · heritage · habits · ways · mores · values are other words for culture.
- creativity is inherent to culture. Simply speaking, if culture is the “background,” then creativity is the “object” that is likely to become a new “background” for emerging and forthcoming “creativity (objects).” Nobody can live well and be creative without the involvement of culture.
- Cultural factors clearly have a profound influence on appropriate outlets for creative expression, on the nature of the subject matter and form of expression, on the functions that various forms of expression serve, and on the types of individuals selected for, or engaged in, creative activity.
- Cultural Creativity 1 Everyday Life, Anthropology of. Another research tradition in which the notion of everyday life became very important was the emerging field of Cultural Studies. 2 Liminality. ... 3 Ethnonationalism: Cultural Concerns. ... 4 Creolization: Sociocultural Aspects
- Additionally, tight cultures are less receptive to foreign creative ideas. But we also found that in certain circumstances—when members of a tight culture do creative work in their own or culturally close countries—cultural tightness can actually promote creativity success.
- (PDF) The Impact of Culture on Creativity (researchgate.net)
- In addition culture is a driver of sustainable development. The cultural sector promotes economic growth through cultural tourism, handicrafts production, creative industries, agriculture, food and medicine, and fisheries. Traditional agriculture and food preparation practices enhance food security.
- A culture may over-exploit the environment, and support a population of similar size. A cul- ture may be perfectly adjusted to a given environment, but still have a small population and be simple in form.
- Culture, alongside economic factors, is probably one of the most important environmental variables to consider in global marketing. Culture is very often hidden from view and can be easily overlooked
- Relationships: Culture influences how you enter into and maintain relationships. … Personality traits: Culture influences whether and how you value traits like humility, self-esteem, politeness, and assertiveness. Culture also influences how you perceive hardship and how you feel about relying on others.
- The intersection between environment and culture is undeniable, from agriculture to art to the industries and professions that dominate different societies.
- They are important for the identities and well-being of people. Cultural environments and the features particular to them provide a unique edge to regions and places, serve as the foundation of the development of local communities and create business opportunities.
- In addition to its intrinsic value, culture provides important social and economic benefits. With improved learning and health, increased tolerance, and opportunities to come together with others, culture enhances our quality of life and increases overall well-being for both individuals and communities
- Our culture shapes the way we work and play, and it makes a difference in how we view ourselves and others. It affects our values—what we consider right and wrong. This is how the society we live in influences our choices. But our choices can also influence others and ultimately help shape our society.
- If culture fosters a more extroverted personality style, we can expect more need for social interaction. Additionally, Individualistic cultures foster more assertive and outspoken behavior. When the general population encourages these gregarious behaviors, more ideas are exchanged and self-esteem increases.
- What are your views on this ?
- please share.
Hi all,
I've been having some issues coming across general guidelines for what an appropriate response rate would be during the item analysis phase of a low-stakes questionnaire.
I'm currently working with a dataset of just under 600 cases that have submitted responses for a 5 option Likert scale-based questionnaire, the responses of which will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of a program. There are a total of 30 questions that measure certain personality traits.
The problem I'm running into is, there are some cases who only answered 28 out of 30 questions, or 15 out of 30, or 18 out of 30. My question is, can I include missing responses in my analysis? If so, what would the cut-off be? Could someone who completed 70% of the questionnaire be included? Just having trouble tracking down some empirical evidence for this situation.
Thank you in advance!
For a Meta-Analysis, we are looking for articles or unpublished data in which there is a correlation between:
- group creativity, measured by indicators such as number of ideas, originality, and usefulness of ideas, and
- personal factors such as personality traits, emotional intelligence, or cognitive factors (sense of self-efficacy, thinking style, motivation, need for cognition or closure).
If you only have raw data that have not yet been analyzed, we would be happy to help analyze it for inclusion. In such a case, please send us the dataset and a description of the key variables described above relevant for the analysis.
We are hoping to include as many studies as possible, so any additional data is greatly appreciated.
If you are interested in more information, we would be happy to answer any further questions and keep you posted on the project as we make progress and finalize the submission.
Hi all! I’m conducting a study where we test to see if our personalities affect how we each perform on certain tasks and react. This study involves an anagram task, and then will give you feedback on your performance. You will be asked to give your opinions on this feedback you received. And finally, you will be asked to fill out a short series of questionnaires! This will only take 20 minutes max to complete
The Ethics Committee has approved this study of Sheffield Hallam University. Please note: you need to be 18 or over to take part. I am in need of at least 180 participants please and thank you
Link below to take part!:
To Whom It May Concern,
To Whom So Ever Interested..
We are a research group from different countries (Palestine, Jordan, India, Malaysia, Germany, Turkey, UK, USA) who are interested in investigating personality traits as well mental disorders from different perspectives, biological, psychological, and socio-cultural domains.
For those who find themselves having the potential to collaborate in data collection (in some cases already we have a plenty enough bulk of raw data), surveying and reviewing the related literature reviews, writing per the APA style, analyzing, interpreting results and drawing conclusions, etc..
Please, send your statement letter of interest to: wael.abuhasan@aaup.edu, and kindly determine where you are most fitting to play a role in such a research project.
Sincerely yours,
Wael M. F. Abuhasan
Hello,
I have several IVs (6 facets of a personality trait) that are assumed to predict two different DVs. The DVs are measured with two different questionnaires (because there are two different constructs) at two different time points. I want to investigate if the 6 IVs predict DV1 (at time point 1) and DV2 (at time point 2). I could just use multiple regression analysis to measure each of them separately but without the time considered. Is there also another way to investigate how the IVs predict both DVs and if there is a relationship between the two DVs? A simple way would be to add a correlation between DV1 and DV2 to the multiple regression but I wonder if there is a more elegant solution to this.
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
I'm currently conducting research to see how much personality traits contribute to vaccine hesitancy. The big five personality traits are my independent variables, and three antecedents of vaccine hesitancy are my dependent variables (Confidence, calculation, and collective responsibility).
I have been advised that total scale scores can be treated as interval data and that regression is appropriate. Should I run three different multiple regressions for each dependent variable and report them separately, or should I use a multivariate regression analysis?
I tried using multivariate regression in SPSS, but I wasn't sure if I was doing it right or if the same assumptions apply to multivariate as they do to multiple regression, and if so, how do I investigate these? (Collinearity, residual normality, linearity, homoscedasticity)
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
The question is basic relation of human mind with war in history
I am looking for the personality traits of inventors, and their needs In the field of creativity.
Can I run a moderation analysis, by using Process, for a model including 3 independent variables, 3 moderators (which influence the relation IV-DV for each IV), and 1 dependent variable?
my independent variables are goal orientation (performance, learning, and refusal) and moderator are personality traits, and independent variable are post-training score
Can I run a moderation analysis, by using Process, for a model including 3 independent variables, 3 moderators (which influence the relation IV-DV for each IV), and 1 dependent variable?
my independent variables are goal orientation (performance, learning, and refusal) and moderator are personality traits, and independent variable are post-training score
Hello all!
I am currently working on my undergraduate dissertation project which uses the BFI scale to assess personality traits in students.
Would an expert in this field please be able to let me know if I am doing my scoring correctly (I am doing this manually without SPSS for now).
I have currently reversed the items as listed on the original BFI eg. Extraversion: 1, 6R, 11, 16, 21R, 26, 31R, 36.
I will then add these up for each participant eg. Extraversion: 5, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4 = 30
Is the next step to average this total?? eg. 30 / 8 = 3.75
Thankyou
Dear Community,
I'd like to ask if you know any studies on the predictive validity of certain individual differences and/or personality traits as predictors for job performance. I'm interested in very specific occupational group (an this group only), that is the quality assurance specialist (software testers).
I struggle with finding such studies, and I believe this is due to the issue with key-words selection. If you happen to know any study from I/O psychology field (or any other similar field) on that matter, I'll be grateful for a recommendation.
Best regards,
Jaroslaw
Hey everyone, I am looking for a comprehensive overview of all variables that the big five personality traits (OCEAN) have been correlated with. I know some isolated reviews for the big five and depression or academic success but I was wondering if there is one overview of all correlations reported in scientific publications?
Im using the BFFM 50-item, likert scale to compare personality traits for online dating users and non-users, I'm unsure what kind of statistical analysis to use? These are my hypotheses:
Hypotheses 1: Non dating sites users score lower for openness, agreeableness, neuroticism, extraversion and higher for conscientiousness.
Hypotheses 2: Dating site users score higher for neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, openness and lower for conscientiousness.
Is it possible that a person is both highly conscientious and highly open also? I conducted factor analysis on responses of personality traits namely conscientiousness and openness to experience and they came out to be as one factor.
Anybody interested in a colaboration and co-authorship? We are looking for a person who can help with statistical analysis on the topic of personality and its relation to other variables. You should be familiar with analysis techniques and softwares. If of interest, please leave your email address. Thank you.
My research question is predicting whether personality traits (the Big 5) will predict loneliness.
I have a score from each participant about how they score overall in each personality trait.
Do I do a linear regression between each personality trait affecting loneliness separately? for example:
- regression analysis between extraversion (IV) and loneliness (DV)
- regression analysis between openness (IV) and loneliness (DV)
etc and do this for all 5 traits
OR do a multiple regression with all the IV's at the same time? for example:
- regression analysis between extraversion, openness, consciousness, agreeableness and neuroticism (IV's) and loneliness (DV)
thank you
Hi everyone,
I’d like to know if there is a way to compare dependent partial correlation coefficients.
I used partial correlations to test, in a single sample, whether three personality traits (X,Z, W) were associated with a series of variables (let’s just call them Y), controlling for 4 control variables + the other personality traits. So, when I tested the correlation between X and Y, I controlled for the 4 control variables + Y and Z. All measures are continuous.
I’d like to test whether the rXYis significantly different from rZY or rWY. I found this equation to compare dependent correlation coefficients:
tdifference =(rxy-rzy ) √(((n-3)(1+rxz))/(2(1-rxy2-rxz2-r_zy2+2rxy rxz rzy)))
However, I am not sure I can use it with partial correlations coefficients.
And if I can use it with partial correlations, what should I use as the correlation between X and Z (rxz)? The zero-order correlation coefficient? Or the partial correlation one (controlling for the 4 control variables and the third personality trait)?
Thank you in advance for your help!!
I am in design phase of conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) focusing on "personality" and internet usage(use of internet). Me and my colleague proposed two different search strings, based upon main and alternative search terms, and we are working to find the best solution in this regard. Moreover, our focus is on non-problematic use of internet. While we are yet to reach an agreement of best solution towards the search string, I thought to make use of collective wisdom from experienced researchers this forum.
Which one of the following is the better string for conducting a SLR:
Option 1: (Personality OR “Personality Traits” OR “Personality Type”) AND (Internet OR “The Internet” OR Web OR Cyberspace)
And to remove studies related to problematic use of internet manually going through returned results.
Option 2: (personality OR "personality traits" OR "personality type") AND ("internet" OR "web") AND (use OR activities OR usage OR functions OR using) NOT (problematic OR excessive OR pathological OR addiction OR disorder)
Your comments/suggestions are of great value for us.
Thanks,
Ali
Sandra Bem's famous Bem Sex Role Inventory has been used since the 1970s to profile masculine and feminine gender roles. Bem argued that those scoring above the median of a sample for BOTH masculinity and femininity are classified as Androgynous and that these are the paragons of mental health because they can adapt to the needs of diverse demands. By contrast, those scoring below the median for both masculinity and femininity are considered undifferentiated and at the highest risk of mental health problems. This is because they score below the social status quo for positive personality traits that predominate the behaviors and expressions of both sexes. So my question is: "who are undifferentiated people"? What characterize them? What contributes to this profile? What can we do to help them? Any thoughts and/or articles would be most appreciated!
I have multiple IVs (4 personality traits, age, gender and frequency use of social media and my DV is whether participants contributed to the circulation of fake news online. I had 3 news posts in the questionnaire (1 real news story and 2 fake news stories).
The participants answered on a scale of 1-5 and for each of the 3 posts, they were asked 'are you likely to like or comment, are you likely to discuss with others online, are you likely to share.
I then combined the answers into 1 variable labelled 'engagement'. So I now have an 'engagement' variable for each of the 3 news posts. This means I now have 3 DV's.
I am really unsure which analysis to run for this data, as I can't find how to analyse the effect of the IV's on each DV and then see if there were differences between each DV.
Any help on this would be really appreciated as I'm at a loss. Thanks in advance!
I am running 3 separate multiple regression analyses to see the differences in how much variance personality traits account for in subjective well being over time. I will then report the r-squared values for each analysis and if they are different. Is this ok?
Currently, I am doing an academic research and want a data set in order to use it in my deep learning algorithms. In order to understand well what I am "asking" for, below there is an example.
Part A | Part B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure = 0.7 (Heavy) |
Slant = 0.2 (Left) | Personality Trait
Baseline = 0.7 (Ascending) |
Greetings,
I plan to use the NEO-PI3 to measure Opennes to experience, but I'm not sure if I can only use the scales of this trait while discarding the others, in order to shorten my full questionnaire...
Is it a psychometrically valid use of the tool?
It's important to me to get a round and detailed look of the concept of Openness to experience, including it's aspects, such as aesthetics and ideas. If I can't use the NEO for that, can I use another questionnaire?
Thanks
I have applied a personality trait questionnaire to the students, which follows the big five theory. Now, I have the score for the five traits of each student in the class. I am trying to group the students according to their strongest personality traits. Does anyone know whether there is a standard metric or procedure I could use to do it? I am also looking for references who have done that to base my works on formal definitions. Any help is welcome. Thank you all in advance.
I would appreciate any information about the research of personality using the objective, behavioral tests as measures of personality traits or dimensions.
Since Cattell's work on so called T-data (personality data collected by objective tests) this approach to measuring personality has been almost completely abandoned. Nevertheless, the data obtained by fully objective measures can serve as important basis in research of personality structure, which is not underlying the biases of prevalent self-report or other-report measures.
The links for more recent published empirical results are especially desired.
Most studies use the NEO-PI-R- 240 item scale by Costa & McCrae (1992) OR NEO-FFI- 60 item scale by Costa & McCrae (2003). Despite being the literature has many other shorter and new scales. The newest and shortest one is the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) by Gosling, Rentflow & Swann (2003). I am looking for an explanation on why using the NEO scale and why not using other scales like TIPI.
Human interactions in the context of Gen Z, what is your opinion?
Good day, everyone!
I'm doing a research on Personality Traits, Reading Habit, and Writing Achievement. My data were collected using Likert-scale questionnaires (for personality traits and reading habit) and a writing test. My purpose is to find the correlation between personality traits and reading habit, personality traits and writing, and reading habit and writing.
Does anyone know what kind of statistical analysis I should use? Thank you, have a nice day!
Hello,
My friend is seeking an collaborator in psychology-related statistics. Current projects including personality traits and their relations to other variables (e.g., age). You will be responsible for doing data analysis for potential publications. Preferbably you should have some knowledge about statistics and is fimaliar with software that is used to do analysis (e.g., MATLAB, R, SPSS). 10 hours a week is required. Leave your email address if interested.
Hello,
We are looking for experts in psychology-related statistics who can provide advice in data analysis and modeling. We have a couple projects avaliables. You will be listed as one of the co-authors depending on yor contribution. Leave your email addrss if you are intrerested.
Hello,
My friend is seeking an collaborator in psychology-related statistics. Current projects including personality traits and their relations to other variables (e.g., age). You will be responsible for doing data analysis for potential publications. Preferbably you should have some knowledge about statistics and is fimaliar with software that is used to do analysis (e.g., MATLAB, R, SPSS). 10 hours a week is required. Leave your email address if interested.
My research is aiming to find out how extraversion and neuroticism personality traits are related to engaging with proactive social behavior (when individuals are forced to work from home due to Covid-19 pandemic) in regard to low or high social connectedness, as well as low or high perceived professional isolation.
I ask kindly everybody who faced the situation of shifting to remote work because of the pandemic to fill out my survey here: https://hwsml.eu.qualtrics.com/Q/EditSection/Blocks?ContextSurveyID=SV_4Mk3a5Ra3OOYqbz
Thanks in advance,
Dobrina
science fiction, fantacy, animation series and movies are watched by children and a specific group of adults. does it signify any relationship with the personality type/ personality of the adult watching it?
I am writing a thesis rationale about the influence of personality traits on employee engagement and turnover intentions and would like to know whether collecting absenteeism and turnover data from the selected organisation is necessary, in conjunction with collecting data from a survey design. If so, how does one go about analysing those reports?
I collected data from 35 participants. Each participant completed the Big Five personality test and took part in a simple visual search task. The aim of the study is to investigate whether there is a relationship between the Big Five personality traits and reaction time in the visual search task. Every participant has a score for each personality trait (there are 5 personality traits) and four scores for reaction time (measured in milliseconds). The reason why there are four scores for reaction time is because the visual search task involved finding the letter T among distractors. There were 5, 10, 15 and 20 distractors hence the four scores.
Overall, I have 5 personality scores and 4 reaction time scores for all 35 participants. I'm not sure how to handle the data since I don't have much experience. Which statistical test would be best to test whether there's a relationship between the IV (Personality scores) and DV (reaction time on visual search task)? Thank you.
I'm a student researcher from the Philippines and I'm looking for a free manual of the Torrance Test for my research about the relationship between personality traits and creativity. I kind of need it immediately. I'm hoping someone can help me.
Hi all, I'm not an very statistically minded so am wondering if anyone who is more familiar with statistical analysis would be able to suggest a statistical analysis to suit this study that I can run on SPSS. My hypothesis is that a medium amount of stressful life events will predict psychological flexibility. I will have 3 categories of high, medium, and low stressful life events and 2 categories of psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility.
I will also be controlling for certain personality traits in subsequent hypotheses. I believe this may require hierarchical regression, but will need to establish the first hypothesis first.
If anyone has any ideas or even if you aren't sure but have some thoughts on it I would love to hear.
If you do have a statistical analysis you believe is suitable please explain why you think it would work as I'd really like to understand more about this.
Thank you!
I'm going to investigate whether personality traits can affect performance on a visual search task. The independent variable is personality (based on participants' answers from the Big Five Inventory questionnaire). The dependent variable is reaction time (from the visual search task). I want to find out whether personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) have an influence on people's performance on a visual search task. I want to see whether there's a relationship between the variables.
What statistical test should I use?
Thank you
I am thinking of looking into understanding the personality makeup of individuals who are more accepting towards others of different races, religion, culture. Will appreciate if anyone can recommend a good scale that specifically measures acceptance of differing opinions, worldviews of perceived "outgroups". Thanks.
I have been advised to run a MANOVA for the data I have collected for my thesis. In trying to do this, I have encountered some issues.
I am analyzing 4 IVs: Personality trait X, split into two levels (high and low), writing type (narrative and informational), emotional content (positive and negative) and gender (male, female and nonbinary). All IVs are between subjects. I have two scale DVs. I have been trying to run a multivariate analysis. However, each time I do, the output shows error: post-hoc tests are not performed for *insert variable* because there are fewer than three groups.
I am really not sure what to do, and would appreciate any advice on this matter. I am wondering if I should be using a different type of analysis instead of Multivariate? Additionally, my output is not displaying any analysis for the "informational" groups, likely because they were measured on only one of the DV's and not the other. I am confused about how to conduct this analysis.
Hello everyone:
What does it mean when a variable is significant in one step but then in the next step it's no longer significant? For example, in this article (https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/1102972.pdf) neuroticism is a significant predictor of well-being in the first step when the Big Five personality traits are introduced, but in the second step neuroticism is no longer a significant predictor when new variables are added. The authors in the discussion seem to interpret step 1 and step 2 of the model independently (concluding that neuroticism is a predictor of well-being even though it is not in the last step of the model). Would this be an acceptable way to interpret a hierarchical regression?
Thank you!
Over the last few month I am surprised that whether their is any relation of personality traits with their learning style? Their are so much of research available on this aspect but I am not reaching to conclusion as research points out learning style impact on academic achievement and personality traits impact on academic achievement but hardly any conclusive research on learning style relation with personality traits.
Secondly, which inventory (Questionnaire) is best to measure learning styles & personality traits?
Hello everyone.
I am looking at conducting my dissertation research around what influences an individual's pro-environmental behavious. From looking at recent research, including meta-analyses, I have decided to look at the effects of personality traits and environmental motives on an individual's pro-environmental behaviours. I can easily find the Big Five scale to measure personality however I am struggling to find the following:
-Environmental Motive Scale (EMS) - recognised as one of the most effective scales to look into this but I cannot find it anywhere;
-The best scale to measure pro-environmental behaviours.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you so much :)
Dear All,
I would like to write up a hypothetical experiment where I would need to manipulate participants perceptions of the following personality traits:
Faithful, Conscientious, Trustworthy, Agreeableness, Openness, Feminine.
I have previously read about Greitemeyers status manipulation and I was hoping to find something similar for personality traits. I would be very happy for suggestions of, or references to, a similar manipualtion.
Kind Regards,
Anna
I am struggling with what analysis to use for my data, I am currently looking at the effect of the 5 different personality traits (independents) on overall psychological well-being (dependent) with both being continuous variables. My sample size is quite small at 73. I have looked at normality, with neuroticism and overall psychological well not being not normally distributed.
I have done a pearsons correlation test finding every personality trait apart from conscientiousness to have a significant correlation with PWB (p<0.05). Then from this, I did a multiple regression analysis, but then the significance of all the traits is completely different to findings from the correlation, (e.g. extraversion and neuroticism had sig values of over 0.2, extraversion had a sig of 0.8)
How do I interpret this, am I doing the right analysis? data is not my strong point!
I'm looking for meta analyses or reviews, summarizing which knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAOs, especially personality traits) are most frequently researched in scientific papers. Thanks
I have to write the theoretical framework for the course project regarding the relationships of personality traits, optimism and somatic symptoms disorder? Can anybody guide me that which which theory will relates?
Hi ,
We are investigation whether Syaesthesia score across has a significant difference across the four groups av individuals (male/female respective high/low in opennennss to experience personality traits). This is a very small sample size just in order to try the process and we needed to exclude a part of sample where synaesthesia test has not been valid which has result that now we have only 2 participants left in one of our four groups.
My question is if it is technically possible to run a ANOVA one-way in this case? Will ANOVA accept only 2 participants in one of 4 groups?
Thank you in advance!
I am in need of a dataset that features stream-of-consciousness essays/texts for a user and his/her Big-5 personality score. Right now I have the Pennebaker and King (1999) dataset, from http://mypersonality.org, which has 2400 instances and binary value for each five of the big five personality trait. Is there any larger or extended version of the dataset available ?
The literature regarding gender and the distribution of personality traits ( Big five personality traits model as a reference,; McCrae & Costa) are pretty clear. Women score higher on traits such as agreeableness and openness for example. There are some examples in the literature regarding why there is a difference between men and women in terms of personality traits. However how does sociological factors such as the influence asserted by the individuals belonging to social group, ethnic group, culture etc. Can we say that women across the spectrum are more agreeable or open and men are less agreeable according the the big five personality traits model (McCrae & Costa 1985 etc) or are there other markers that also influence out traits...can it be that in some cultures women are less agreeable than men for example or do you think the big five model and the distribution of traits in terms of a gender perspective is universal? Are there any identifiable research gaps in your view? Best wishes Henrik
H1 - It is hypothesised that individuals with poorer mental health will be associated with increased offending behaviours.
H2 It is further hypothesised that Dark triad traits will moderate the relationship between mental health and offending behaviours.
Can someone please tell me what the IV/DV are for each hypothesis.
Hi there I am seeking some help at the moment with analysing my dissertation data.
I am investigating the effect of personality traits on psychological well being and physical activity levels in office workers.
I have done psychological well being as an overall rating as a continuous variable. With a Pearson’s correlation with the Big Five Personality traits.
Physical activity however is ordinal, low-moderate. So I cannot do correlations?
I would ideally like to analyse PA and PWB separately with their relationship to the traits?
The big five personality trait model ( McCrae & Costa) describes 5 bipolar dimensions of personality. The model received some criticism but is still generally accepted and perhaps it is the only descriptive model of personality that is "widely" accepted. What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of this model? Is it complete or not? If not, what is missing?
Best wishes Henrik
I am doing my study on the employees working in private sector banks with a sample size of 300. I wants to test moderating effect of personality traits on the relationship between technostress creators and job outcomes, in correlation analysis i found that, only one dependent variable is significantly correlated, now should run regression analysis with all dependent variable or only one variable which is correlated?
He is interested in collaborating in a multicultural project of psychometric network models on the multidimensional concept of the light triad (humanism, faith in humanity and Kantianism) and dark personality traits, to date we have collaborators from Brazil, Poland, Peru, Nigeria and Colombia. The first multi-country study is presented as evidence (DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4347559), and several similar cross-cultural projects are being developed simultaneously with other mental health and personality concepts (if you accept your participation you can consult the OSF for the most current network research). Some of the work being done on these personality concepts also includes data from South Africa, Turkey, Slovakia, United Kingdom, El Salvador and the United States. Therefore, we invite interested researchers who can survey in their respective countries, who will co-author SCOPUS Q1 articles with the contribution of their respective surveys (minimum 400 participants per country).
Study mentioned
My profile demonstrates correlational, comparative and longitudinal network studies with new methodological contributions.
Hello everyone,
Currently I'm conducting a systematic review and meta analysis of Attachment and Personality. I have 15 different comparisons between the different attachment styles (3) and personality traits (5).
Does anyone have any suggestion how to write the results section presenting so much data?(i.e. what to write on the text? what to present as forest/funnel plots etc.)
I'm quite desperate and drowning in data and would highly appreciate any help I could find (if you could refer me to similar articles that could be great).
Thank you everyone
i am planing to conduct an experimental research on advertising effectiveness. i am a bit confuse that whether i should go for within effect or between effect experimental design? the experiment consist of six different manipulation type in advertising and its effect on two personality trait.
Some recent research has established this difference is it useful to be aware of this, in the study and treatment of patients?
Some motives/strategies (e.g. affiliation, achievement, power) are assumed to be stable personality traits and strategies to attain rank in social groups. Also, the Dark Triad or the Big 5 are assumed to be kind of stable.
However, does the motives/strategies influence/define and come before Personality (e.g. Dark Triad or Big 5) or is the other way around?
Also, are motives more stable personality traits compared to DT, and the Big 5?
What do you think?
What do you think?
Level of openness:
Level of Ambivalence
Motivation for change
Level of efficacy
Should you be willing to take part in the validation of a questionnaire to measure readiness, Please email be on svc@usb.ac.za
I've found quite a few scales for vicarious and personal embarassibility as a personality trait so far (i. e. Kelly & Jones, 1997; Maltby & Day, 2000; Uysal et al., 2014...). As I'd like to have a larger sample rate specific contents on their capability to evoke a state of embarassment, I was wondering if there was a good instrument for this specific task. Your response is greatly appreciated.
Looking for suggestions of actual tests, not methods nor processes (like ECD).
Are there any recent articles (2018-2020) reviewing Zimmerman's (2008) meta-analysis?
Hello All, I am not even sure if this is possible, but I have used this dataset for several publication -albeit with different constructs-and have not seen such low t-values. For example, I have a model with all the BFI personality traits as constructs related to an established construct measuring the intensity of Facebook use. All the loading and other measurement model statistics are spot on, but the t-statistics of the outer loading related to Neuroticism are all nonsignificant. Removing some of the items does not improve the situation. Interestingly, the outer loadings are all above 0.7 and the other constructs are good. The AVE, CA and CR are also good. What could be cause of this? I am using SmartPLS 3 and running native bootstrapping.
My topic is "the Influence of Personality Traits on Smartphone Usage" and this is for my thesis as I am a final year student at university. I calculated Pearson's r for Extraversion and smartphone usage. The r= .084 and the two tail was .471 and n=75. What is the p value and your interpretation of these results?
Hi,
I'm looking to calculate the overall correlation based on correlations in subgroups.
To give an example, i've made scatterplots in the pictures attached. In the first picture (figure 3), looking at all data points, the correlation seems to be positive, but when limited to within a the subgroup (the circles) the correlation seems to be negative.
So my question is whether there is a test in SPSS or R that i can use to determine the overall correlations within the two categories.
I am researching about how the personality characteristic of each internet user impact their mindset and decision in facing cyber security threats e.g.: phishing. Please guide me how to defines/classify the points scores vs big 5 characters groups? I know it is based on reverse points, but not sure how to match it and do not have the scores board formula. Thank you very much in advance.
My research these days is focused in agressive behaviour and hostility at work, and i would like to read more about how informal hierarchies are build through dynamic interaction of the people involved. What i am wondering right now is if some kind of personalities enjoy this hierarchical competition or how personality traits can predict behavior in this kind of enviroment.
Hello everyone,
I have started my PhD at Helmut Schmidt University, I am doing my research in Germany, Hamburg and my research topic is "Do family characteristics influence the personality of parents and offspring?" I am looking for;
- A comparison of the influence and the impact of family characteristic in offspring and parent's personality traits
- To investigate the probability of personality disorders affecting the offspring and whether it is predictable from their parents and/or family characteristics.
Family characteristics are alcoholic parents, parental medical/psychiatric illness, parental separation/loss, abusive parents, unemployment, parental education status, teenage mother, large family size.
Sample size- 200 dyads (100 parents and 100 offspring),.
Variables- Independent variable- 8 types of family characteristics. Dependent variables- Personality traits, gender, age.
Tools- For personality traits, NEO-FFI, 60 items questionnaire(german version) and for predicting personality disorder - (need suggestion)
Currently, I am confused about using the Actor Partner Interdependence Model, am I correct on this, if not, what other models I can use?
Some motives/strategies (e.g. affiliation, achievement, power) are assumed to be stable personality traits and strategies to attain rank in social groups. Also, the Dark Triad or the Big 5 are assumed to be kind of stable.
However, does the motives/strategies influence/define and come before Personality (e.g. Dark Triad or Big 5) or is the other way around?
Also, are motives more stable personality traits compared to DT, and the Big 5?
What do you think?
Is there any scientific study showing the development of fluency in relation to the personality traits of a learner in the acquisition of English as a second language?
Hello
I think I can study this behavior with some actions like:
following the trend challenges
posting on Instagram about trend news (to have a reaction about trend news I mean)
What do you think?
would you please inform me about this?
Thanks
I am trying to see if there is a relationship between personality traits and level of support for vigilantism using survey data. All the survey responses are likert scale and I am not sure what test would be best.
An example question for the independent variable: Here are a number of personality traits that may or may not apply to you. Please let me know the extent to which you agree or disagree that these traits describe you. You should rate the extent to which the pair of traits applies to you, even if one characteristic applies more strongly than the
other. - Critical, quarrelsome (strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree)
An example question for the dependent variable: A group of villagers spots three men illegally harvesting rosewood in the bush. They gather their weapons to confront the men about the crime. During the confrontation tempers flare and the rosewood harvesters are killed. - Thanks to people like the villagers, at least something is done about crime. (strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree)
I am going to use R to conduct the analysis so any coding advice is appreciated!
Hello All. I have completed a PLS model and was wondering which combinations of the Big Five I should consider to use when performing interaction analyses. I was initially told to combine two traits that have similar polarity in terms of their correlation coefficients. My question now is which combinations make sense?
1) Extraversion x Neuroticism
2) Openness x Extraversion .... etc ....
Also, I believe in learning from example, so would appreciate it if someone could recommend a good article where this type of interaction analysis has been performed.
Thanks.
