Science topic
Ocean - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Ocean, and find Ocean experts.
Questions related to Ocean
Climate Change and Oceanography
1. Are we marching towards enhanced ocean acidity resulting from climate change?
Whether the uptake of atmospheric CO2 and its subsequent increases in dissolved CO2 has significantly lowered ocean pH?
Has it significantly reduced carbonate ion concentrations below critical calcium carbonate saturation thresholds for marine and aquatic organism growth?
Whether lowered pH has paved way for more favorable conditions for toxic algal blooms?
2. Are we marching towards significant variations in ocean salinity resulting from climate change?
Whether, changes in currents, sea ice brine rejection and net freshwater flux in the ocean has significantly altered ocean salinity with effects on mixed layer structure, density stratification and the vertical movement of nutrients and marine organisms?
3. Whether climate change has led to a significant warming of ocean, and in turn, led to an increased stratification that essentially has reduced the oxygen content of the ocean?
Has it led to an expansion of oxygen minimum zones in the open ocean?
4. Whether the fundamental structure of ocean warming has been affected so far significantly from climate change; which in turn, has impacted the intensity of upper-ocean stratification and the timing and strength of coastal upwelling?
Has it altered the vertical transport of oxygen-rich and nutrients-rich waters that affect fishery and marine ecosystem productivity?
5. Have we ended up with marine heat waves, so far, resulting from climate change, which essentially push water temperatures above critical threshold values; and eventually, leading to (a) coral bleaching episodes; (b) undesirable algal blooms that significantly disrupts ecosystems, tourism and human health; (c) species shifts?
6. As on date, do we have a significant shift in thermal zones that affects the suitability of fisheries and marine/coastal species habitat and migration-routes in any ocean resulting from enhancement in mean ocean temperature (associated with climate change)?
Suresh Kumar Govindarajan, Professor [HAG]
IIT Madras 22-Dec-2024
The following in English translations are suggested, recent ones first, which are specially important for the present epoch of history. Can you suggest some more or comment on any?
Bengali Poet Rabindranath Tagore (1861 -1941, A.D.). English Trans., A.M.
“The ones you put down by force
Will tie you down in recourse!
The ones you left behind in neglect
Are, for ever, pulling you back”!
German Philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770 – 1831, A.D.)
“There can be no Matter without Motion and no Motion without Matter”.
German Polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 – 1832, A.D)
“All that Exists Deserves to Perish” (Alles was Entesteht, ist Wert, dass es Zugrunde Gehet, The words of Mephistopheles in “Faust”)
Persian Poet Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī - جلالالدین محمّد رومی (1207 – 1273, A.D.)
“You are not a Drop in the Ocean, You ARE the Entire Ocean in a Drop”!
Greek Philosopher Heraclitus of Ephesus (Ἡράκλειτος, Herakleitos; ~ 535 – ~475, B.C.)
“Everything Changes due to Inner Conflict”
At the end of October, 42 climate scientists sent an open letter to the Nordic Council of Ministers, urging them to draw attention to the major ocean circulation change in the Atlantic. “A string of scientific studies in the past few years suggests that this risk has so far been greatly underestimated”, they write. ICOS Ocean stations in the North Atlantic monitor the situation closely and can provide near-real-time data on any possible changes in the AMOC strength.
The risk of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) collapsing is higher than previously estimated, warns a group of 42 climate scientists in their open letter to the Nordic Council of Ministers. The AMOC is a system of ocean currents that transports warm water into the North Atlantic and provides Europe its mild climate. The latest IPCC report in 2021 estimated with medium confidence that the AMOC “will not collapse abruptly before 2100, but if it were to occur, it would very likely cause abrupt shifts in regional weather patterns, and large impacts on ecosystems and human activities.”
How can instruments and systems for the conservation of nature, the biosphere, the highly biodiverse coral reef ecosystems of the seas and oceans be improved?
The ongoing process of global warming is also causing, among other things, an increase in the temperature of the seas and oceans. This increase in temperature and the increase in the scale of water pollution in the seas and oceans is causing the death of coral reefs, which have formed over millions of years and have developed the most biodiverse ecosystems of the seas and oceans.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of researchers and scientists:
How can instruments and systems for the conservation of nature, of the biosphere, of the highly biodiverse coral reef ecosystems of the seas and oceans be improved?
What is your opinion on this?
What do you think about this topic?
Please reply,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
I am working on a thesis project where I have to quantify the impact of independence for isalnds among various sectors (energy, water, mobility, waste) for some aspects (direct economic impact, employment, co2 emissions). The main difficult is to fidn data about costs and quantity. Not finding data water costs I would like to elaborate a simple model to estimate them aproximately identifying some specificality for different islands (ex. for desalination technology I could insert some parameter considering temperature and salinity of ocean water in different regions because these factors impact energy consumption of the process and costs consequently). Estimating costs for different technologies I could estimate savings switching from actual technology (often tank shipped from mainland) to an indipendent scenario.
Hello
Can anyone suggest me ideas and methods to improve underwater wireless optical communications in seas and oceans? It includes everything that can be implemented now and ideas that can be implemented with future research and development.
Dear educators,
It is with great appreciation that I address you. The role of educators is fundamental in the formation of individuals and in the construction of a more just and conscious society. The dedication, commitment and passion that you demonstrate daily are inspirations for many.
Understanding the carbon cycle in the oceans is essential to face the challenges of global warming.
The oceans play a vital role in the carbon cycle, absorbing approximately a quarter of the carbon dioxide (CO₂) emitted into the atmosphere. This process is carried out through marine photosynthesis, where phytoplankton and marine vegetation convert CO₂ into oxygen and organic carbon, which serves as food for countless species. Thus, preserving marine biodiversity is essential for the healthy functioning of this cycle.
Furthermore, ocean acidification, resulting from increased CO₂, threatens not only corals and other marine species, but also the oceans’ ability to act as a carbon sink. Therefore, research and education on the biogeochemical processes that occur in the marine environment are essential.
The Blue Amazon, with its vast marine wealth, needs to be valued and protected. The adoption of public policies aimed at protecting the oceans and promoting sustainable development practices are crucial steps to ensure that the carbon cycle continues to function efficiently.
The importance of educating and engaging society on this issue cannot be underestimated. Understanding the marine carbon cycle and its implications helps us develop more effective strategies for mitigating climate change, ensuring a healthier and more sustainable planet for all.
Captain Cintia Cardoso
Specialist in Marine Sciences
Master's student in Marine Science and Technology
Postgraduate student in Marine Biology
Physical Education - Bachelor's and Bachelor's degrees CREF 016036 G/SC
Postgraduate degree in Physical Education Teaching Methodology
CFAQ (MAC/MOM) - CFAQ (MOP/POP) - CFAQ (PEP) 2023 MB
In the EC-Earth3-Veg model, all land-atmosphere datasets have a spatial reference of GCS_WGS_1984. However, the ocean datasets, such as sea surface temperature (tos) and sea surface salinity (sos), do not have any spatial reference assigned. What steps can I take to resolve this discrepancy and assign a proper spatial reference to the ocean data?
I want to develop the figure like attached figure. How can I get, peak period and significant wave height at any given location.
In an ocean-continent convergent setting, after initiation of the descent of oceanic crust under the continental crust:
1. How deep would the oceanic crust sink before slab rollback occurs?
2. How much time does it take for slab rollback to begin?
The genesis of hydrocarbons has been debated for more than 300 years and continues to the present. The discussion of the problem led to the formation of organic and inorganic scientific schools. Over time, the hypothesis of polygenesis was also formed. With the development of engineering and technology, new concepts on the genesis of hydrocarbons and diamond-bearing structures were presented. One of these is the concept proposed by us, according to which hydrogen, hydrocarbons and diamonds are formed not only at great depths of the mantle, but also at different depths of the Earth's crust in different regions of the Earth, due to dehydration of serpentinized rocks. Dehydration of rocks occurs in both oceanic and continental crust. Under the continental slope, due to the collision of the continental and oceanic crust, dehydration of serpentinized rocks of the 3rd layer of the oceanic crust occurs. Dehydration of rocks also occurs at various depths of the continental crust, both in geosynclinal and platform areas. The formed hydrocarbons and geofluids migrate to the upper horizons of the crust, differentiate and accumulate in fractured granites and sedimentary layers. Based on the proposed concept, the genesis of some giant deposits of the Earth, the Gulf of Mexico, the Caspian Basin, and Western Siberia is proposed. According to laboratory studies, dehydration of rocks in the earth's crust causes extremely high pressures and temperatures. Kimberlites and explosive tubes are formed from carbon-containing components present in the medium. The proposed concept is characterized by more than 17 criteria that are used in prospecting and exploration work in different regions of the Earth. The results obtained cover a wide range of issues of geology and geophysics. Further research is presented to the author in close cooperation with specialists from these fields of science from around the world.
Dear all,
Clarivate recently published the first impact factor of Frontiers in Remote Sensing (IF = 3.4), which is very promising for a first value.
The journal targets both technical aspects (instrumentation, new retrieval techniques in the whole frequency domain, experiments, etc.) and applications over land surfaces (water and carbon cycle, LUCC, etc.), atmosphere, ocean, urban and ice-covered areas, with specific sections each supervised by an Editor-in-Chief and an associated board.
etc.
Do not hesitate to visit the website to join us as a reviewer or associate editor, and to submit manuscripts (research papers and reviews).
We may have a 50% discount waiver for reviewers and editors this year.
Contact me for any specific question, thank you!
I have 6 ecosystems, 3 of which are substrate A and the other 3 are substrate B. each ecosystem has about 10 species. I have calculated a simpsons value for each ecosystem and a simpsons value for each substrate. I would like to statistically compare the two index values of substrate A and B, is this possible in any way? Since I would like to statistically compare the biodiversity between the two substrates, what is the best way to go about this?
I have six ecosystems in two substrate categories (Triplicates essentially). I have determined shannon wiener index values for each ecosystem and also for the two categories separately. I have done this for two separate sets of data that were sampled in two separate years. Is it possible to statistically compare the development of the biodiversity between each of the categories i.e., the development of biodiveristy in ecosystem 1 between the two years, using the shannon wiener values somehow? Are there any other tests that could work? I am aware of the hutcheson t test however, some of my data is not normally distributed.
I would really appreciate some help!
Maritime transport, also known as sea or ocean transport, is the process of moving goods and passengers over water using ships and other vessels. It is a crucial component of international trade, accounting for the majority of global trade by volume. Key aspects include:
1. Types of Ships. There are various types of ships used in maritime transport, including container ships, bulk carriers, tankers, passenger ships, and specialized vessels.
2. Major Shipping Routes. Significant shipping routes include the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal, and major international trade lanes like the Asia-Europe and Trans-Pacific routes.
3. Port Infrastructure. Ports are critical hubs in maritime transport, providing facilities for loading, unloading, and storage of cargo. Major ports include the Port of Shanghai, Port of Singapore, and Port of Rotterdam.
4. Regulations and Safety. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) sets global standards for the safety, security, and environmental performance of international shipping.
5. Environmental Impact. Maritime transport has environmental implications, including emissions from ships and potential pollution from oil spills. Efforts to mitigate these impacts include adopting cleaner technologies and stricter regulations.
6. Economic Importance. Maritime transport is vital for the global economy, enabling the efficient movement of large volumes of goods, which supports trade and economic development.
The "blue economy" refers to the sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of ocean ecosystems. It encompasses a wide range of activities, including:
- Marine Renewable Energy: Harnessing wind, wave, and tidal energy.
- Fisheries and Aquaculture: Sustainable practices that avoid overfishing and encourage responsible farming of aquatic species.
- Maritime Transport: Shipping goods and services efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
- Tourism: Coastal and marine tourism that supports conservation efforts and local economies.
- Biotechnology: Exploration and commercialization of biological materials found in marine environments for pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and other products.
Can we stop global climate change? Does human scientific power reach the world's climate change? What is the response of the researchers?
As you know, humans are very intelligent and can predict the future climate of the world with hydrology, climatology and paleontology. But don't countries, especially industrialized countries, that produce the most harmful gases in the earth's atmosphere and think about the future of the earth's atmosphere? Do they listen to the research of climatologists? What would have to happen to get them to listen to climate scientists?
Miloud Chakit added a reply
Climate change is an important and complex global challenge, and scientific theories about it are based on extensive research and evidence. The future path of the world depends on various factors including human actions, political decisions and international cooperation.
Efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change continue. While full recovery can be challenging, important steps can be taken to slow progression and lessen its effects. This requires global cooperation, sustainable practices and the development and implementation of clean energy technologies.
Human scientific abilities play an important role, but dealing with climate change also requires social, economic and political changes. The goal is to limit global warming and its associated impacts, and collective action at the local, national, and international levels is essential for a more sustainable future.
Reply to this discussion
Osama Behnas added a reply:
Global climate change is impossible to stop. Human scientific power cannot reach the climate changes of the world.
Borys Kapochkin added a reply:
Mathematical models of planetary warming as a function of the argument - anthropogenic influence - are wrong.
Alastair Bain McDonald added a reply
We can stop climate change, but we won't! We have scientific knowledge but no political will. One can blame Russia and China for refusing to cooperate, but half of the US population (Republicans) deny that climate change is a problem and prefer their promiscuous lifestyles to the answer:
All climate change is loaded on CO2 responsible for the greenhouse effect. Therefore, scientific experiments from several independent scientific institutions around the world should be conducted to determine what the greenhouse effect is at different concentrations of CO2. Then, a conference of a reputable and professional organization with the participation of all independent scientific bodies should be held to establish standards on CO2 concentrations and propose policy measures accordingly.
The second action that can be taken is to plant as many trees and plants as possible to breathe CO2 and release oxygen. Stop any deforestation and immediately plant trees in any tree-filled areas.
Lucy George added a reply:
We have the knowledge, tools and resources to ensure a livable and sustainable future for all. Carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases are major contributors to global warming. Therefore, reducing greenhouse gas emissions is very important and should be done as soon as possible to achieve zero greenhouse gas emissions. Both forests and oceans play an important role in regulating our climate, so increasing their natural ability to absorb carbon dioxide can also help prevent global warming.
Reply to this discussion
Ilan Kelman added a reply:
Yes, we can address and stop human-caused climate change. See extensive details in the full technical reports of ipcc.ch
Mohamed Sarmoum added a reply:
I think it is difficult to stop global climate change, but, on the other hand, we can develop adaptation mechanisms with this change
Mrutyunjay Padhiary added a reply:
The challenge of combating global climate change is complicated and multidimensional, involving scientific, technological, political, economic, and social initiatives. Even though we may not be able to "stop" climate change entirely at this time, we can surely lessen its worst consequences and adjust to the changes that are already occurring. It is true that advances in science have allowed us to gain an in-depth knowledge of the mechanisms causing climate change as well as the tools and techniques that can be used to slow it down. Scholars from diverse fields such as ecology, engineering, economics, climatology, and social sciences are actively investigating climate change and devising remedies for it.
Sudhir Shukla added a reply:
Global climate changes are at Macro- Mega scale changes basically induced by the continuing geological processes, hitherto invisible to present human generation because of their slow pace. The modern human race might have accelerated this change by adopting industrial expansion and ever-growing greed for conventional energy. Human effect is most visible in weather changes and weather anomalies more profoundly visible now-a -days when compared to global climate changes.
Think of climate changes in the past / geological history when human did not exist at all?
Reply to this discussion
Hong Yin added a reply:
Talking about global climate change without time and space scale is not science. The earth has its own rules to change while human is relatively nobody. What human could do is to try best to understand and respect the earth and find the balanced way to survive better.
Does the concentration of CO2 gas in the atmosphere cause warming of the earth's atmosphere? Or does it lead to less rainfall when it warms up? Or does the warming of the earth's atmosphere lead to an increase in rainfall on the earth's surface?
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) is the global mean change in surface temperature for a doubling of CO2 from the pre-industrial (PI) value. ECS is one of the key metrics used in assessing future global warming, and therefore plays a very important role in climate change related policy-making. One important question in this regard is how ECS changes in a warmer world. Several studies found that ECS increases at higher CO2 concentrations (e.g., Bloch-Johnson et al., 2021; Colman & McAvaney, 2009; Gregory et al., 2015; Meraner et al., 2013). And, more recently, Mitevski et al. (2021) found a non-linear and non-monotonic dependence of ECS on CO2 concentrations. In addition to the surface temperature response, the precipitation response is another critical aspect of climate change. To evaluate precipitation changes, the key metric used is Hydrological Sensitivity (HS). HS is defined as the difference in global mean precipitation per one degree of global mean temperature change from the PI control state. Previous studies have explored the response of the hydrological cycle to global warming by examining HS in terms of the global energy budget, and have described the mechanisms affecting it (e.g., Allen & Ingram, 2002; Held & Soden, 2006; Jeevanjee & Romps, 2018; O'Gorman et al., 2011). The fact that HS is energetically constrained means that the precipitation response can be separated into fast and slow components. The fast response depends only on the CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, before the surface temperature has time to warm, and results in a decrease in precipitation. The slow response, in contrast, is associated with surface warming, and results in an increase in precipitation (Andrews et al., 2010).
Reply to this discussion
James Garry added a reply:
Mr Kashani,
You have written two rather facile queries, and part of a third.
"Or doe"
Abbas Kashani added a reply:
Does the concentration of CO2 gas in the atmosphere cause warming of the earth's atmosphere? Or does it lead to less rainfall when it warms up? Or does the warming of the earth's atmosphere lead to an increase in rainfall on the earth's surface?
James Garry added a reply:
Abbas,
1) Yes, the rising carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere does lead to an increase in the surface and globally-averaged air temperature.
2) As the partial pressure of water vapour is a strong function of temperature (and that vapour is also a 'greenhouse gas') we expect to see a rise in the global humidity - that in various locales should result in more rainfall.
Neither of these are contentious matters and are well-addressed in the literature.
2)
Article More rain, less soil: Long-term changes in rainfall intensit...
I recommend Google Scholar.
Very useful.
Mrutyunjay Padhiary added a reply:
Through the greenhouse effect, the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas in the atmosphere is a significant contributor to global warming with many other greenhouse gases. Heat from the sun is trapped in the atmosphere when CO2 and other greenhouse gases build up, preventing it from escaping back into space. Global warming is the term for the total rise in temperature that results from this. Rainfall patterns can be impacted by Earth's atmosphere warming, while there is a complex relationship between CO2 concentrations and rainfall that varies based on local climate dynamics. Higher temperatures generally have the potential to alter the rates of evaporation and atmospheric circulation, which in turn can affect the patterns of precipitation. higher moisture can be held by warmer air, which could result in higher evaporation from lakes, oceans, and land surfaces. In certain areas, the increased moisture in the atmosphere may be a factor in the intensity of rainfall events. Higher temperatures, however, can also bring about modifications to weather patterns, including adjustments to air circulation and modifications to precipitation distribution. Also, variables including local geography, atmospheric stability, and variations in cloud cover can all have an impact on changes in rainfall patterns. While some places might have more rainfall than others, other regions might see less rainfall or changes in the frequency and severity of precipitation events. The ecosystems, agricultural practices, water supplies, and human societies may all be significantly impacted by these modifications in rainfall patterns. All things considered, even while the rise in CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere is the main cause of global warming, temperature variations that follow can have an impact on precipitation patterns, which can have complicated and varied impacts on the distribution and intensity of rainfall.
Michael Girimay Gebremedhine added a reply
Yes, the concentration of CO2 gas in the atmosphere does cause warming of the Earth's atmosphere. This is due to the greenhouse effect, where CO2 and other greenhouse gases trap heat from the sun, leading to an increase in the overall temperature of the Earth.
As for its effect on rainfall, the relationship between CO2 concentration and rainfall is complex and can vary depending on regional and global climate patterns. In general, however, a warmer atmosphere can lead to changes in precipitation patterns, including shifts in rainfall distribution and intensity. These changes can result in both increased and decreased rainfall in different regions.
Alexander Kolker added a reply
The statement such as "Increase in carbon dioxide gas in the air ... prevents the flow of long-wave radiations through the atmospheric layers thus retaining it. As a result, the atmosphere warms up leading to 'global warming'." can be found in 1000's of posts, blogs, papers, reports, etc, etc.
However, if one looks at simple physics and the energy balance in the atmosphere, it would become obvious that it is nonsense, of course setting aside the politics behind all global warming screams and alarmism.
Yes, it is well known that CO2 molecules have an absorption band of the infrared radiation (IR) around ~15 um that comes out of the Earth's surface, although the water vapor in the atmosphere is a much more potent IR absorber.
However, that absorbed energy cannot stay in the excited molecules for long and is radiated back in all directions. But even if we neglect all that radiation and look simply at the energy balance we can find that the excitation energy absorbed by CO2 must be transferred somewhere, i.e. to heat the entire atmosphere. A process of transferring the excitation energy (rotational, vibrational, and momentum) to the surroundings through molecular (mostly elastic) collisions is called thermalization. From the simple balance, we could see
Cp(co2)* M co2 *deltaTco2 = Cp air *Mair *deltaTair.
The ratio of the heat capacities of the CO2 and the air is about 0.89 in the temp range 300 - 350 K.
The content of CO2 in the air is about 420 ppm or ~0.05% weight, while the rest of air (N2, O2, Ar, and traces of other gases) is about 99.95% weight.
Hence, delta T air = 0.89 *0.05/99.95 * deltaT co2= 4.45 *10^-4 * deltaT co2 C.
If CO2 heats up due to infrared absorption by, say, deltaT co2 ~1 C, then the air (the entire atmosphere) will heat up to ~4.45.10^-4 C, that is an absolutely negligible amount.
In order to get the air (atmosphere) to increase the temperature to, say, 1.5 C, the amount of CO2 in the air must be about ~63% weight, i.e. the ratio CO2/air must be about 1.7 !!. In other words, the atmosphere must consist of about 2/3 of pure CO2. This takes place on Venera, or some other distant planets but will never happen on Earth in any scenario for 100000 years.
Of course, the above energy balance is oversimplified, and the physics of heating up or cooling down the atmosphere is much more complex and non-linear. However, the bottom line is that a minuscule amount of CO2 cannot result in global catastrophic warming. Assuming that human-produced CO2 is the only factor affecting the entire atmospheric temperature is a total nonsense and a typical alarmism which is fed by politics and financial interests.
Surface water samples were collected in middle of the country. Very far from the ocean. Samples were collected just after the North East Monsoon.
Why the snow cover of the Tibetan Plateau in winter and early spring has the least effect on the intensity of monsoons? Does the temperature and climate change conditions in the Tibetan Plateau affect the monsoon climate?
Asian monsoon systems affect some of the world's most densely populated regions and affect large parts of Asia and the surrounding oceans. This massive air circulation is mainly due to the significant temperature difference caused by how the land of Eurasia and the seas around the Indian Ocean and the western Pacific are heated differently.
Both land and sea influence play a vital role, but disentangling the influence of each has been very difficult. For example, the length of time that current atmospheric conditions affect future climate (the "memory effect") is known to be less than a week: while land and oceanic memory effects are important for seasonal prediction, the condition-specific effect The land has not yet been determined. understood
During that time iron from weathering will enter the oceans and presumably form soluble compounds.
As you know, nitrogen and oxygen are useful for us humans, but they are gases that are effective in changing the climate of the planet, and one of the gases is the only percentage of carbon dioxide that destroys the ozone layer. CO2 emission as a result of human activities is one of the basic factors controlling the physical and chemical processes of the atmosphere. The human population has increased the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere and changed the thermal budget by releasing pollutants. The increase in pCO2 of the atmosphere compared to the pre-industrial period leads to a greater absorption of atmospheric CO2 and a decrease in the release of oceanic carbon dioxide. Therefore, more of the absorbed carbon dioxide remains in the oceans and affects the composition of ocean water. The heterogeneous distribution of landmasses and as a result the unequal distribution of population in the two hemispheres of the earth has caused the difference in the emission of pollutants and atmospheric compounds in the two hemispheres of the earth. The temporal-spatial distribution of pollutants shows that there is an increasing trend of CO2 and it has been uniform during the recent periods, and despite the difference in amounts, it has had a similar trend in the two regions of the earth. It can be seen that the future contracts in northern temperate latitudes have increased compared to other latitudes of the globe.
Of course, carbonated soft drinks use CO2 gas, which is very useful for digestion, but on the other hand, it is harmful for osteoporosis and causes arthritis. Coca-Cola is also used as a powerful tire cleaner. And also some things are used for cleaning.
In general, greenhouse gases can be classified into two large groups. The first group of gases specified in the Kyoto Protocol includes methane, (CH4) and nitrogen oxide (N2O), hydrofluoric carbon (HFCS) and hexafluorosulfur (SF6). The second group is the gases specified in the Montreal Protocol and includes carbon chlorofluorocarbons (CFCS), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCS), and halons.
The effect of each gas in increasing the greenhouse effect depends on the concentration of the gas, the wavelengths absorbed, the amount of absorption per molecule and the presence or absence of gases that absorb the same wavelength.
Where does the air we breathe every day come from?
As you know, air circulates on the planet and wherever there is living space on the planet, it needs oxygen. So if we are by the sea. Day and night, we get oxygen from the sea side with air circulation. If we are next to the mountain, we get oxygen from the flow between the mountain and the plain and the foothills. If we are by the river, the flow of the river and the river breeze will bring us oxygen air. And if we are in the middle of the forest, the breeze of forest trees and parks will bring us oxygen. and most importantly at the beginning of the morning every day due to the rotation of the winds from the higher latitudes of the earth to the lower latitudes of the earth; That is, from polar regions to tropical regions during the day and night; We humans smell arctic air. It means that every day the pollution moves from the hot and tropical regions of the earth towards the pole of the earth on both sides of the north and south and at night this clean air returns to us humans and we eat the polar air every morning. And enjoy it, let's go. But this pollution remains in the poles and the earth's atmosphere has a hole in the ozone layer, and its restoration depends on the activities of us humans. Of course, oceans, especially phytoplanktons and corals, play an important role in establishing the Earth's atmosphere. But is it always like this? Doesn't climate change affect our weather? Isn't the earth's oxygen decreasing? Are 19 gases increasing in the Earth's atmosphere: Are ozone-depleting gases such as CO2 increasing? Is it because of a forest fire? Will CO2 increase? If the ozone layer is destroyed more? Don't we humans suffer? Can we live on this planet anymore? What does the life of the planet depend on? If it wasn't for James Wallen Allen's layer. Didn't the solar winds evaporate all the oceans of this planet, and the planet Earth is like the planet Venus, which used to have an ocean but now doesn't? So how happy we humans should be right now. Was there oxygen after the creation of the planet Earth? Several of Earth's atmospheres were toxic due to the presence of volcanoes. Now that the volcanoes are extinct and much less active, should we poison the atmosphere of the planet by producing smog cars? Can we breathe in this planet despite the smoke and pollution of cars and factories? Aren't we like fishes who are stuck at the bottom of the air ocean and need oxygen? But have we deprived ourselves of it? And the interesting thing is that we all know what we are doing and we are not doing it the right way. So let's think about our own smoky cars and smoky factories for ourselves.
The primary factor that prevents people from entering and exploring the marine environment is fear of the unknown and not being able to process how humans are capable of maneuvering the ocean realm. With human impacted climate change destroying our oceans at an accelerated rate, it is essential to address adult fears to reconnect them to the ocean. Cultural insight and dispelling fears will help to eliminate the disinterested humans and the ocean.
I think it belongs to Eusiriidae, probably a juvenile Eusirus but I'm not sure. The specimens (pelagic) were collected in the Antarctic Ocean.
I need help, doing a paper on the plastic pollution of our oceans.
Hello,
I study the impact of activities on Oceans.
1. Ecoinvent is mistakingly considering the "infinite dilution" hypothese, forgetting that the dilution of pollution is usually done through its absorption by biological entities, and so with consequences on the ecosystemic services (O2 production, CO2 absorption, water filtration, etc.).
2. For example, "water, cooling , in ocean" has no impact according to EF 3.1, whereas it has a 42,95 m3 of water depriv per m3 of "water, cooling" impact in many other compartments. In any case, water cooling has an impact on ecosystems and on water ( pumping water through a heat exchanger , warm it up by 5-20°C possibly, then release it) on rivers, so has an impact on ocean life, I presume.
=> I need to go and read the reports which detail the hypotheses of this 42,95 m3/m3
Many thansk for your help !
Dom.
In the real ocean, mesoscale eddies typically undergo a growth phase followed by a decay phase. However, in an idealized model, a single Gaussian-shape mesoscale eddy always undergoes a process of continuous decay without growth. So all I can think of at the moment is that the lack of eddy growth process is due to the lack of eddy-eddy interaction. What are the physical phenomena of eddy-eddy interaction? Eddy-merge events may be a classic example.