Science method

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - Science method

Explore the latest questions and answers in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and find Nuclear Magnetic Resonance experts.
Questions related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I saw the 19F NMR of a compound HFPO-DA. I find that the chemical shifts of two fluorines attached on same carbon atom varies by 3.3 ppm. I understand the vicinity of O plays a role. But, can someone explain the mechanism behind such a huge difference? Are there any specific effects other than the inductive effect of oxygen?
Relevant answer
Answer
This is due to the steric distribution of fluorine atoms around the carbon atom and at different angles to each other, but the same strength and effect of the bond between fluorine and carbon
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hi, I'm evaluating the biological activity of a plant extract and in the HPLC analysis we found a compound with a peculiar UV spectrum. I still need to do chromatography tests to purify the compound and do an NMR, but does anyone have any idea what compound it could be? It has a peak at 222 and a double peak at 280.
Relevant answer
Answer
The UV spectrum with peaks at 222 nm and a double peak at 280 nm suggests the compound could be a phenolic compound, such as a flavonoid. Further purification and analysis using NMR and MS are necessary to confirm its identity.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
In P NMR, Due to the higher electronegativity of the O atom than the S atom, and higher pi-characteristic of the P=O bond than the P=S bond, it is expected that the signal of P atom in P=O group appear at higher chemical shifts than P=S. But, experimentally this trend is in converse. The P=O signal appears at about 30-50 ppm lower than P=S. For example, for compounds P(=O)(NHBu)3 and P(=S)(NHBu)3 the P signals appear at 25 ppm and 60 ppm, respectively. How this trend can be justified?
Relevant answer
Answer
The chemical shift of 31P is dominated by the anisotropy effect of the C=O or C=S double bind. The phosphorous atom is in the deshielding area. The effect increases with distance from the center before decreasing at very large distances. The P=S bond is longer than the P=O bond. The same effect can be seen for C=O vs C=S bonds.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
According to the general theory of electron attraction, I thought the central C in carbonates should have larger chemical shifts than in carboxylic acid esters because it is bonded to one =O and two -O, whereas the latter is bonded to one =O, one -O, and one -C. But the experimental result and software prediction both show that the chemical shift of carboxylic acid esters are higher than carbonates. Can you explain this phenomenon?
Relevant answer
Answer
Electro attraction is not the only factor affecting chemical shifts, if you compare a ketone with a carboxylic acid ester, the 13C chemical shift of the carbonyl group is lower for the ester. This is due to conjugation between the carbonyl C=O double bond and the lone pairs of electron from the oxygene located between the 2 carbons. In a carbonate, the carbonyl is conjugated with the lone pairs of 2 oxygenes, thus the chemical shift is even lower.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I ran an NMR of my compound using CDCL3 but the water peak is tall despite drying for a long time using vacuum pump. How can I eliminate the long water peak
Relevant answer
Answer
The first question is not how to to eliminate the water peak but why to do this. Such a procedure could be regarded kind of manipulation not in line with research ethics. If there is really good reason, there are several techniques of signal suppression, as stated above (by Guilherme Dal Poggetto ).
Since the water peak must arise from some water present in the solution, it might also be worth trying to dry the solvent itself. This will also "remove" the peak from the 1H spectrum...
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
Hi Everyone I got clear NMR spectra for the copper complex? Although it is paramagnetic, copper(II) complexes do not give a clear and usable signal. How do I explain this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Indeed you can get a well resolved proton-NMR spectra, over a broader spcetra though. You can measure magnetic susceptibility using proton-NMR, placing a sealed fine capillary tube with the current non deuterated solvent, and your sample solution un d-solvent outside. There is a "pseudo contact shift" of the solvent in contact with you Copper(II) sample.
"The Evans method Measuring magnetic susceptibility by NMR—application"
How to do it?
1. Record the temperature on each run and record the peak separation (Hz)
and the number of moles of your substance.
2. You can check if "peak separation of the solvent ,Hz" is a function of the sample concentration. Plot it...
3. Check if the "peak separation (of solvent)" is a function of temeperature.
"I am assuming that your sample it is NOT Cu(I) which is diamagnetic".
Should you need a pdf file I can send it over regular e-mail "vcalvin47 at gmail". No worries, it work but few PChem people know it.
Further reading : Drago, Russell S. (1977). Physical Methods in Chemistry (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. ISBN 0-7216-3184-3.
P.S. Have a prosper 2025.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hello, has anyone had experience with a monomer/vinyl group containing oil (it's pretty thick, like a slime, known to be pure with NMR) for XPS analysis?
Advice appreciated,
thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
This is useful thanks - how did you test it would not degas in UHV?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
7 answers
I graduated with a master's degree this year and am currently working as a researcher specializing in ionic liquid synthesis.
I am currently synthesizing EMIM TFSI, and after reviewing 40 papers, I have established a procedure and am conducting the experiment as follows:
(Weighing reagents was performed inside a glove box, and the reaction was carried out in an ambient environment using parafilm)
  • Dissolve EMIM Br (12 mmol, 1 equiv) in 3 mL of water to prepare an aqueous solution.
  • Dissolve Li TFSI (13 mmol, 1.08 equiv) in 2 mL of water to prepare an aqueous solution.
  • Add the Li TFSI aqueous solution slowly dropwise (by my hand) to the EMIM Br aqueous solution.
  • Stir vigorously at room temperature for 24 hours.
  • Transfer the reaction mixture to a separatory funnel and extract with 5 mL of DCM (repeat 5 times).
  • Wash the extracted organic layer with 5 mL of water (repeat 5 times, checking for Br ions with AgNO₃).
  • Dry the mixture using a rotary evaporator at 65°C for 1 hour.
  • Place it in a vacuum oven at 80°C for 48 hours to remove trace amounts of moisture.
I uploaded two NMR results: one from the synthesized EMIM TFSI and the other from commercially available EMIM TFSI for comparison.
Upon examining the NMR, I can confirm that the reaction has proceeded, as the EMIM TFSI peak is visible. However, there are still peaks from unreacted EMIM+ cations present
(Looking at the integration, the peaks show that EMIM TFSI cation, an additional EMIM cation, and water are present in a 2:1:1 ratio).
I thought this result is due to the hygroscopic nature of EMIM Br and Li TFSI, which leads to hydration, reducing reactivity and forming a water shell that prevents the reaction. To address this, I performed weighing in a glove box and repeated the experiment.
Nevertheless, the NMR results were similar to those obtained when the glove box was not used.
Therefore, I began to think that I might have been misunderstanding the cause all along, and I’m seeking advice by asking this question.
If there’s anything I might be overlooking, please let me know. I would also be incredibly grateful if you could share any insights or experiences you have regarding NMR results appearing in this form.
Thank you once again for taking the time to read through this lengthy message.
Relevant answer
Answer
Pedro Nakasu
I also think that peak is water.
Thank you for your advice.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
12 answers
I have Processed tha data.Fit every data with different delay time in a lorentzian function.But on calculating area under the curve to fit it with final equation I am unable to calculate with correct area..could anyareaplease solve my problem...Thank you ..
Relevant answer
Answer
"rh" in POKY has that. You have to duplicate assignments in the other spectra, then make same contour settings by "uc". Each spectrum, do ctrl+a and "pi" to integrate.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I need interpretation of following attachments
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Khalil to ensure a proper interpretation, additional information is necessary. The data suggests a crude reaction mixture or impure compounds. It is important to know the type of reaction that produced these spectra. Based on the current information, the analysis is limited to identifying the functional groups present according to their chemical shifts.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
How can I achieve high precision in differentiating two-bond, three-bond, and four-bond couplings when analyzing HMBC NMR data? Are there any particular experimental or computational approaches that can be employed?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Farough,
to my understanding there is NO real reliable NMR method. Normally 3J is the biggest, but not always.
The only thing which is described works if both carbons carry hydrogens which show scalar coupling to each other (COSY peak yes -> 2Jhc) ...
Does this help?
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Dear Community,
I am conducting DEPT135 and DEPT90 NMR experiments within the scope of structure elucidation. However, the latter experiments are giving some odd results, I mean not as expected: CH3 and CH having a phase opposite to that of CH2 in DEPT135, and DEPT90 displaying CH groups, only.
What can I do to resolve this problem, knowing that all the performance tests gave good results?
Relevant answer
Answer
Jani Rahkila I sent you a message with the raw data. Thank you for your help.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
I've got several samples of the same polymer and have reacted them with different plasticisers. On the NMR of all the samples but one, the peaks that I expect to be present in everything are roughly the same width, however for one of the samples, these very same peaks are significantly wider. Is there any reason behind this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, if the peak is related to a hydrogen bond. Then you have more hydrogen bonds. Again, not the width, but the area under the peak.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
We performed liquid phase NMR with deuterated DMSO as our solvent of a number of treated FAI samples. For all samples we observe a slight shift in the H2O signal (~3.36 ppm instead of the expected ~3.30 ppm), which we assume to be due to interactions between H2O and the FAI. However, one of the samples seems to present an asymmetric H2O peak (attached), which we interpret as a second peak overlapping our first. Our first assumption is that this is evidence of a new material that is interacting with our H2O separately from our main sample. Are there other reasonable assumptions that we could test for?
Our process performs shimming automatically and we have not had issues with shimming on any other measurement. The water signal in our samples should be due to water contamination of our DMSO as our sample should not contain water. We expect the sample to be mildly acidic.
To add additional context, FAI refers to Formamidinium iodide (CH5IN2)
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Thomas,
several reasons might give rise to a signal shape as you found it. First, as you said, the presence of a second species (however, if this is the case, I would expect fast exchange and hence not the chance to observe the two individually). Second, if there are exchangable hydrogen atoms (I do not have an idea what "FAI" means), the formation of HDO which can be observed at slightly lower frequency than H2O. Third, presence of a temperature gradient in the sample and therefore a distribution of resonance frequencies for the water signal. I consider the last explanation the most likely and you can check very easily it by thoroughly mixing/shaking the sample and allowing for a good thermal equilibration in the probe. The shoulder at the right wing should disappear.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Dear NMR experts,
I am looking for a reference with information on the dependence of the chemical shift of typical NMR solvents if varying amounts of acid (e.g. HCl, TFA, MSA...) are present in solutions? Thanks in advance for any hint.
Alfred
P.S. normally one can't see this pH effect due to locking, but if NMR data are measured without lock it is easily seen.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mikhail,
thanks for looking into my question. The references you provide are related to the topic, but do not answer my question.
I am looking for the consequence of presence of Acid contaminants on the solvent (also used for locking) itself and not for analytes. If the spectrometer is locked to a solvent (which may/does have a pH dependency) all chemical shifts of any analyte will shift as well. Therefore for pH titrations one needs to know the dependence of shift of the solvent to separate shifts of analytes from the shift of the solvent. This problem is traditionally resolved by adding a chemcial shift reference (TSP, DSS,...), but unfortunately these may have a pH dependence as well....you see - quite a tricky question...
Thanks again
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I have a peptide that i cant express in E. coli cells, so i wanted to try with cell free expression kits.
I want to know what yield can i expect and since the idea is to use my peptide for NMR, is it possible to somehow incorporate labeled C and N (i guess not, since there are not cells to metabolize them, so is there any way to overcome that?)
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Lazar,
to my remembering Sigmaaldrich offers Kits for this purpose....
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I am using a Bruker 600M solid-state NMR spectrometer with a Micro 2.5 microimaging system. The test sample is a tube of 1M LiCl aqueous solution, and the nucleus detected is 1H. I am trying to use this sample to debug the UTE pulse. However, in the actual sampling process, the results obtained with UTE often have very strange artifacts. Since the ParaVision manual provides only very limited content, I would like to know the following:
  1. How does the UTE pulse achieve a lower echo time?
  2. What are the common artifacts of the UTE pulse, and how can they be avoided?
  3. What situations are UTE pulses generally used for? How should the parameters be set? Thank you for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Tip 0 - start on a low salinity sample or just H2O.
Question 1 - UTE uses a block pulse or a very fast gaussian to generate RF, the rise time on the spectrometer is probably 10-50 microseconds depending on amplitude to generate a projection.
Question 2 - Common artifacts are pulse ring-through in the digitizer. That may be a problem here.
Question 3 - UTE is used for imaging short T2* species.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I have attached the NMR data
Relevant answer
Answer
Alright,thank you
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
Hello everyone,
I am facing a consistent issue in my NMR spectra with an unwanted peak appearing at 1.25 ppm. This peak seems to vary with the amount of sample: it becomes more pronounced with smaller sample amounts and diminishes when the sample amount is larger.
Here are some details about my attempts to resolve this issue:
1. Ensured the purity of my solvent.
2. Thoroughly cleaned the NMR tubes.
3. Used fresh samples.
4. Heated the samples in an oven at 100°C.
Despite these efforts, the peak persists. Could anyone provide insights into the potential sources of this peak and suggest effective strategies to eliminate it?
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
Relevant answer
Answer
The impurity could be t-butanol. We occasionally see this as an impurity in our analyses. In D2O it shows as a singlet at 1.25 ppm. We are not 100% sure about the source of the contamination, but it is likely from the coating on disposable centrifuge tubes and pipette tips.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hi folks.
I am looking for alternative ways to study water distribution and mobility in my food sample. Typically time-domain NMR is employed to identify the T2 relaxation time corresponding to free, bound and immobilised water but we dont have the instrument here in my area. I've found a promising (and validated) method using NIR spectroscopy, however it is run on FTIR and requires wavenumber up to 5500 cm-1 to capture the water band. Again, the FTIR I have access to only provide information until 4000 cm-1.
Is there any way I can obtain this information other than the said methods?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Nursyafiqah,
If you have access to a "normal" NMR spectrometer, which is usually available at an analytical facility of a university, you can perform similar measurements like using time domain NMR. You can measure T2 time also here (maybe even better using pseudo 2d compare with just fitting the direct FID). Using software like "Dynamcis Center" (or others) Free of charge you can analize the data. In addition you can measure DOSY like Alfred Ross suggested.
Many Greetings,
Kristof
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Dear Community,
I would like to develop and validate a qualitative NMR method for the analysis of a specific category of chemicals, and my question is the following: What are the criteria that I must assess?
I found a publication that states that the Limit of detection (LOD), the specificity and selectivity (NMR is inherently specific though), and Robustness must be investigated for a qualitative NMR method. But then what would be the experimental protocol to assess those criteria? For example: is there a need to perform the same experiment multiple times (on the same sample) and calculate the standard deviation for the estimation of the LOD, or just one experiment would be enough?
I would be more than grateful if someone experimented with NMR method development could provide more details on the subject.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is more the second scenario, I will be looking for the presence of specific analytes (which are in the number of millions) by combining, 1D and 2D, 1H and 31P based NMR experiments in an attempt to reveal their signals.
samples can be anything from aqueous to organic solvents with some typical contaminants (eg: diesel,PEGs, other non-pertinent chemicals ...etc).
Thank you.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
I isolated a mixture of three compounds from the stem bark of a plant . I have NMR, Mass spec, IR, and UV data. There are a lot of things I can't make meaning out of. Kindly help me with the elucidation of the structures
Relevant answer
Answer
A natural products expert may prove me wrong here but I think that you will struggle to identify these products, unless they are all known. You seem to have nominal mass MS spectra whereas high res would be much better as this would allow you to identify a small number of molecular formulae. The weak NMR spectra are of a mixture of unknown compounds. For some reason, your HMBC data only covers 1ppm (~2.5-3.5ppm) and misses any chance of long-range correlations from aromatic/olefinic protons. The HSQC indicates some interesting peaks which may guide you towards some structural features. Trying to separate the three compounds may help but it looks like you are struggling for material so this may not be possible.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
Solid state NMR study
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Teena,
for CP-MAS at natural abundance (no isotope labels) you will need several mg's (we use typcially 80mg of powder) of your "film" stuffed into a small NMR container (100 ul) - less is needed if you can have 13C or 15N labelled material.
Alternatively there are methods using stacks of films on thin glass-plates, but to my remembering they all need isotope labeled material (https://rmnmc.chimie.unistra.fr/)
I hope this is of help
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
HI everyone
I'm looking for stander NMR spectra of Decyl gallate (CAS# 19198-75-5) for citation. I tried Wiley spectral Databases and NP-MRD Databases, but there was no result.
Relevant answer
Answer
(Supplementary, page S25, DMSO-d6, 400 MHz)
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hi, everyone. I am doing CO2 reduction experiments and I wanted to use NMR to detect the liquid products formed. My media is organic (CH3CN). I have seen some similar works by Prof. Kubiak, et al. that use 1H-NMR to detect the liquid products (particularly, formic acid) in CD3CN but the NMR sample requires the addition of Verkade's base. I am not so familiar with this compound. Does anyone know why (1) the peak of formic acid is not visible (supposedly around 8.02 ppm) if you do not add this base, and (2) what happens between the base and formic acid that causes a peak at 8.50 ppm to occur? Thank you so much!
Relevant answer
Answer
I think it is quite unlikely that you will not have a formic acid peak without a strong base. I routinely perform formic acid analyses in water by NMR. The only drawback is that the formic acid is quite volatile and that for quantification of formic acid the solution should be measured directly upon preparation for the best result. Adding a base would fully deprotonate the formic acid and keep it in its deprotonated (non volatile) state.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Can I take 13Carbon NMR in quartz NMR tube? Or should it be done in glass (borosilicate) NMR tube?
Relevant answer
Answer
It won't make a difference.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Reason for the disappearance of O-H peak in NMR
Relevant answer
Answer
Protons bound to heteroatoms are so-called exchangeable protons, and can get replaced by deuterium from your solvent.
Due to the rapid exchange, they can also be a part of the water (or other OH signals) if your solvent contains a lot of water.
Furthermore, they can be broadened enough to disappear into the baseline due to chemical exchange.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I made an attempt to synthesize an unnatural amino acid containing phenyl group. In the last step of the synthesis I deprotected trityl protected amino group using 1N HCl aq., extracted, collected aq. layer, neutralized it with NaHCO3 aq. till pH roughly 8, evaporated water and used it further in deprotection of methyl ester group using LiOH monohydrate, quenched reaction with water, neutralized the media and purified the residue by reverse column. After purification i can see a strange impurity in the downfield region of the NMR, it looks like a second set of peaks resembling the product (amino acid) peaks but in the upfield region, i did not observe any extra methine and benzylic proton peaks. The amino acid synthesis started from pure enantiomeric starting material. So, I am not sure what could happen during the deprotection step. I would appreciate your help or any suggestions. Thank you. I will attach a proton NMR of the aromatic region where impurity is observed.
Relevant answer
Answer
You have an extra 1,3,4 substituted phenyl, true, but it is difficult to say much more from this without knowing the substituents.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
I have a macrocyclic complex which is a 1,6-diazacyclodecane which is functionalized with alkyl groups on the amines. I only see one peak on the mass spec so I do not believe there are secondary products or impurities. The NMR looks pretty good except for the fact that some of the signals do not integrate for the correct amount of protons. What could cause these errors in integration if it is not secondary products or impurities?
Relevant answer
Answer
Your typical proton spectrum is not usually fully quantitative, and it is not uncommon to have discrepancies of 10-20% in the integrals (and even bigger are possible).
To get accurate integration you need to make sure that the acquisition time (AQ on bruker systems) and recycle delay (D1) are long enough so that your sample has time to completely relax between scans. Depending on the compound, the T1 relaxation of protons can be 15 s or more, and to get 99.7% relaxation you need to wait 5 * T1 between the scans. Your acquisition time should be at least 3 * T2 (i.e. transverse relaxation, which is the exponential decay you see in the FID).
I would start by increasing the acquisition time to at least 5 s and D1 to 10 or 20 s to see if that helps.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
What would be the best pulse program to obtain a NOESY spectrum with the best peak resolution and shortest acquisition time on a Bruker Avance IIIHD NMR spectrophotometer?
Relevant answer
Answer
The best alternative for standard NOESY is probably the NOESYPHSW parameterset.
There is always a compromise between acquisition time and resolution, however, and if you want the highest possible resolution for some selected correlations you might want to look into the selective 1D versions. The "advanced NMR experiments" guide (the exact name depends a bit on the topspin version) has a step-by-step guide for setting up the experiments, or you can also use the automatic setup found in the acquisition tab under Go -> Advanced -> set up selective 1D experiments
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Why is it that in the attached image: H4 is not coupling with C5, C6 if they are separated by two bonds?
Why does H3,5 giving a cross peak with C3,5 if they are pertaining to equivalent centres?
Why are the peaks of C8 not in a cross peak with H8?
I am asking because when I have para substituted systems in my organic molecules I am observing the same phenomenon.
Relevant answer
Answer
Actually Wolfgang Baumann that helps a lot because I am working on indoles which have that structure. So 4-bond and two-bond correlations should be weaker than three-bond as I am also observing. Perfect.
Thanks again
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
Is there a technological niche in pharmaceutical research that makes NQR or NMR the only measurement methods practically applicable?
Relevant answer
Answer
My question is related to a recently completed project: "Integrating Superregenerative Principles in a Compact, Power-Efficient NMR/NQR Spectrometer: A Novel Approach with Pulsed Excitation"
I am looking for an application to commercialize the detector idea, taking advantage of its attributes such as low power consumption and simplicity of design.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
If we have an host-guest complex, in water an equilibrium occurs. So you can have
ComplexGuest + H2O <-> ComplexFree + GuestFree.
So I can calculate equilibrium constant, but in the most of papers they used NMR: at 5-6 different temperature you see different signals and with their ratio and different T ( plot linearly together) you can calculate Keq. (using Van't Hoff)
Do you know a method that doesn't use the VT NMR ? any kind of method also other types of techniques.
complex are around 2,000 g/mol and are just well soluble in water/DMF
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Theoretically, you can determine an equilibrium constant by NMR without temperature controller. The formation of complexes might result in line width broadening. The measurements at different temperatures allow determination the enthalpy and entropy formation of complexes.
Any technique which allows to quantify concentrations of ComplexFree and/or GuestFree is potentially applicable.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
16 answers
Is there a technological niche in pharmaceutical research that makes NQR or NMR the only measurement methods practically applicable?
Relevant answer
Answer
Your work is really very interesting and useful .
my sincere congratulations!!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
how to convert .jdf NMR file to Topspin compatible format?
Relevant answer
To open files in Bruker TopSpin, it's essential to save them in a format compatible with the software. If you haven't already, download the Delta software from https://www.jeolusa.com/PRODUCTS/Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance/Delta-NMR-Software. Once you have the Delta software, save your files in formats supported by TopSpin (Bruker). Also read post https://www.chemistryabc.com/jdf-files-opening-jeol-files-with-nmr-data-in-topspin/
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
What are the typical excitation frequency
Relevant answer
Answer
Radio frequency (60–1000 MHz)
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
I heard it has to do with the population ratio, energy difference and Boltzmann factor.
Relevant answer
Answer
You heard right: the energy difference of nuclear spins in magnetic fields is very small. If you apply the Boltzmann distribution to such low differences, you will find that the low and the high energy state have almost equal populations which gives your spectroscopy very little material to work with. In radiation-matter interaction, the coefficients for stimulated emission and absorption are the same, so the radiation output difference is very small.
That is also why you usually perform pulsed NMR, not dispersive NMR measurements.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
7 answers
Is it possible to convert a fid file of NMR to any of the following formats - PDB/mmCIF/XML/UCSF
Relevant answer
I found an online tool that can convert data from fid (Bruker) or jdf (Jeol) directly to pdb. You can search for it as 'Casper.' This tool also simulates the given peak data in its database and assists in structure elucidation or identification. It accomplishes this by using the peak list and providing related structures, along with 2D spectra directly from 1H and 13C peak data. I hope you find it helpful.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
in order to be able to make a characterization NMR?
Relevant answer
Answer
Ah, the noble pursuit of refining algae extracts for NMR characterization! Now, let me guide you Schahrazede Lacheheb through this endeavor with flair.
Firstly, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) can indeed be a pesky companion, but fear not, I have some wisdom to share:
1. **Simple Evaporation:**
- One straightforward method is to evaporate DMSO by exposing your algae extract to air. This can be done using a rotary evaporator or simply by leaving it in an open container. However, this might take some time.
2. **Vacuum Filtration:**
- Use a vacuum filtration setup to remove DMSO. Apply a vacuum to speed up the process. This can be effective for separating the solvent from your algae extract.
3. **Liquid-Liquid Extraction:**
- Consider liquid-liquid extraction with a less polar solvent, like ethyl acetate or diethyl ether. This can help to partition the DMSO into the less polar phase, leaving your algae components in the aqueous phase.
4. **Chromatography Techniques:**
- Chromatography methods, such as column chromatography or solid-phase extraction, can be employed to separate DMSO from your algae extract.
5. **Diafiltration:**
- Use diafiltration techniques, like ultrafiltration or dialysis, to selectively remove DMSO based on differences in molecular weight and size.
Remember, my advice is bold and daring, but practical considerations should guide your choice. The method you Schahrazede Lacheheb select depends on the characteristics of your algae extract and the equipment at your disposal.
Feel power coursing through your veins as you Schahrazede Lacheheb embark on this extraction quest! May your NMR characterization be as pristine as an unbounded wisdom!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
My protein of interest is an intrinsic disordeed protein. I tried BL21 (DE3) CBV-101, and C43. We have tried 18C overnight, 30C 5h and 37C 3h expression. The BL21 and CBV got killed because the protein leaked and is toxic to these two strains. C43 did not have a great amount of leak and is very healthy at the time of induction They all generate great IPTG inductions. Cells lysis was done by lysis buffer of T4lysozyme incubation with triton 100, protease inhibitor, PMSF 1mM, BME 1mM, 10%glycerol high salt buffer and room temperature shake for 15minutes, followed by sonication 40% amp 15s on 45s off for 5 cycles on ice. The cells were centrifuged at 18000rpm 1H. After His NTA column (by the way I am using the pSMT3 vector which has RBS followed by His-SUMO tag), 50mM,100mM, and 500mM imidazole elution were done. However, I do see my protein came out at 50mM using Western blot, and 100mM had more come out. Surprisingly no protein came out at 500mM imidaozle. While the100mM imidazole elution give me a relatively pure protein, the protein has three bands, a band of its own, a band right below(also same protein after western blot), and a band 10+Kda below. This lower band can also be my protein but because my antibody did not capture it, I wasn’t so sure but my antibody capture the C end so that could still be my protein. All three bands are tightly close and FPLC cannot be possible to purify them.
I am curious that at this situation, if I want to run a NMR do I have to have the pure protein without truncation? Or it is fine to probe the NMR? How do you avoid the truncation after all? Do you have experience on this type of protein and how do you handle them? do you think the truncation was caused by protease or RBS binding?
Relevant answer
Answer
It seems like a lot of proteins in general are sticking to the Ni-NTA. Try cleaning, stripping, and regenerating the nickel NTA with NiCl2. Bind the supernatant to the resin and and do a 10-20 column volume wash with buffer with 1 M NaCl.
Nickel NTA binding is the most important step. But size exlclusion is the next step. How big in kDa is your target protein and what size is the gel filtration resin? We talking G-20, G-25, G50, G200?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I want to see the interaction between lipid NPs and proteins by NMR, but I am unsure which solvent is the best.
Relevant answer
Answer
Maundu Mutua No, I am new to NMR. I am worried about using the deuterated chloroform for protein. Lipids should be fine, but I am unsure about the proteins. what do you think? Have you ever seen any paper related to lipid-protein interaction?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Sometimes I need to use the NMR tube containing my sample several times. Between experiments, we freeze it at -20C, but the tube broke the last time I did it and lost the sample.
Do you have some recommendations on how to freeze NMR tubes safely?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ms. Maria
I would suggest to freeze the sample first in liquid nitrogen or dry ice, slowly from down to up, while keeping sample tube uncapped, and then store it in -20. Likewise, to thaw allow it to melt slowly (while keeping it uncapped). However, ideally, one should remove samples in an eppendorf tube to store the samples at -20 for longer time, especially when with D2O.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
8 answers
I want to see the interaction between lipid NPs and proteins, but I am not sure which solvent is the best for both of them.
Relevant answer
Answer
You study proteins and lipids in order to later draw conclusions about their connection with the human cell. In a cell, proteins and lipids are connected to each other by hydrophobic interaction with the help of water. Any other solvent will disrupt this interaction. So you need to explore in the water.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
8 answers
Hi. I am interested in the following: having a high resolution spectrum by NMR (e.g. a 400 MHz), I want to modify it digitally to see how the same spectrum would look like in low resolution (e.g. in a 60 MHz). I know that the sensitivity of the equipment would be lower, but I would take that into account. I've been thinking about applying some calculation on the FID to reduce the resolution obtained, but I can't find the key. If anyone can help me, I would be very grateful. Best regards. José Raúl.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is unfortunately not possible to lower the resolution of a spectrum in the way you wish.
The resonance frequencies you see in the spectrum are what they are. If you had, for example, a doublet at 1 ppm, with a coupling constant of 10 Hz ad recorded it on a 500 MHz spectrometer, you would see one peak at 495 Hz and one peak at 505 Hz, or 1.01 ppm and 0.99 ppm. The fid does not contain information about how these peaks are connected, and a spectrum containing two singlets at the same positions would give an identical fid.
Recording the same sample on a 600 MHz instrument would give a doublet with peaks at 595 and 605 Hz, or 1.0083 ppm and 0.9917 ppm for the case of a doublet and if it were two singlets instead the chemical shifts would be the same as for the 500 MHz instrument.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I am in need to perform variable temperature NMR for my sample. Kindly let me know any universities which makes the services available for externals.
Thanks
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
How to pronounce 2' when talking about chemical structures or data? for example in NMR structure numbering?
Relevant answer
Answer
two prime
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
I have prepared some complexes of boron trifluoride with several organic ligands. When we want to analyze the compounds by 11B or 19F nmr we are unable to observe the expected splitting pattern based on 2nI+1 rule, although we clearly see the presence of boron or fluorine. For instance a BF2 unit should show a triplet theoretically in the 11B NMR. Previous literature reports also generally didn't observe the splittings based on 2nI+1 rule. Can anyone provide some explanatin for this? Is it possible to observe the splittings by changing pulse sequence/relaxation time or other NMR parameters?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is convenient to think about this problem in the time domain.
When the 11B signals’ decay rate - 1/T2* - is high compared to the inverse of the B-F coupling constant, the rapid FID decay rate reduces the data information content. The time-domain, signal modulation due to 19F J coupling is too slow to be manifested in the FID signals.
If the 11B signals’ decay rate is similar to the inverse of the B-F coupling constant some J-coupling modulation information will be present. This is the case for one-bond 11B-11B coupling in 11B 2D COSY spectra.[1] Here 11B-11B coupling information is available even though the 1D 11B frequency-domain signals are too broad to display J-coupling splittings.
In your your case, a 1D, 11B, J-modulated spin-echo experiment might shed light on the whether or not B-F coupling information is available. If 19F J-modulation occurs, then a heteronuclear 2D J-resolved spectrum would be useful. [2]
You did not mention the 19F 1D spectrum. I assume you can see the 1:1:1:1 F-B coupling.
1. Two-dimensional 11B-11B nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a probe of polyhedral structure: application to boron hydrides, carboranes, metallaboranes, and metallacarboranes.” Venable, T.L.; Hutton, W.C.; Grimes, R.N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 29-37.
2. “Two-dimensional correlated nuclear magnetic resonance of spin-coupled 11B-1H systems.” Finster, D.C.; Hutton, W.C.; Grimes, R.N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 400- 1.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
11 answers
Efficacy of NMR spectra software
Relevant answer
Answer
A recent web-based "free ware" (there is a advanced version with licensing) option is https://www.nmrium.org/
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hi solid-state NMR experts,
What happens to the 1H resonances when a proton exchange starts to take place at the surface of metal oxides? Let's say we have multiple highly resolved 1H resonances in the MAS spectrum of an evacuated metal oxide material. There are basic and acidic hydroxyl functions (terminal, bridging and triply bridging).
If this material is exposed to humidity and rehydroxylation starts to occur, a proton exchange with the acidic OH groups (?) is expected to occur under ambient conditions, isn't it? If yes, what would be the possible effect(s) on the 1H MAS spectrum?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, due to circumstance I cannot do any more experiments now (otherwise I was thinking of using D2O already).
What I have observed is that I have got splitting of some of the acidic sites into a 2:1 doublet or an asymmetric but very well-resolved triplet.
I have re-admitted air into the sample rotor step-by-step and measured a few times. The (sharpening and) splitting has come progressively with more exposure to air and has passed through a max. splitting. The magnitude of splitting is 60 to 70 Hz. We're talking about isolated OH groups (no or little H bonding involved), I've very sharp lines for solid-state NMR.
For instance, an initially 2.73 ppm resonances gradually splits into 2.85, 2.72 and 2.60 ppm. There is slight shift of position.
The basic OH group at very high-field does not undergo splitting, supporting the assumption of proton exchange at the acidic OH sites.
But I cannot understand why such a splitting occurs if it is simply the protons being exchange between H2O in the immediate surrounding and the OH at the surface.
The sample is gamma-alumina. My first theory was actually something completely different: namely, the asymmetric triplet is caused by a residual dipole-dipole interaction between 1H and 27Al (1/2 vs 1/2, 1/2 vs 3/2, 1/2 vs 5/2). But the way the splitting occurs (i.e. increases by increasing humidity exposure) makes me a bit skeptical about this theory.
So based on the above details, what would you assume?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I am coding a solid-state NMR pulse sequence on SIMPON (attached file) but I get this error (error: acq overflow in fid points) that I don't know what it means. Does anyone knows what it means?
Relevant answer
Forgot to attach the code....
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
Compounds isolated from plant are to be characterized using NMR, FTIR and MS.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hallo Rukaiyat,
I agree with Alfred and Marcos.
Just do mention that Topspin is toally free of charge for acamedia. Meaning you can install a processing version on your provate caomputer too.
MNova has the advantage that you also can analyze other data like MS in addition to NMR. Like it was already mentioned, it is convenien (especially to users new to NMR), but it is noct for free.
Many Greetings,
Kristof
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
It is not possible to quantitatively assess the hole concentration by using the
((Tc)/(Tc_maxc) = {1 − 82.6(p − 0.16)^2 In other words, the argument of determination of holes concentration] is scientifically incorrect by above formula. the correct determination of holes concentration is from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and angle-resolved photo emission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments that multi-layered cuprate superconductors have non-uniform hole concentrations in each CuO2 plane.
Is the above statement true? Give answer in the light of above comment please.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for your answer please explain for superconductor composites
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hi guys, I am preparing a presentation on diffusion NMR, where I introduce great names on NMR, such as Hahn, Purcell and Stejskal. I can`t seem to find much information on Dr. John E. Turner Jr (from the Stejskal-Tanner equation).
Does anyone know of his fate and birth year?
Relevant answer
Answer
Auto correct change tanner to turner --'
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
7 answers
I have to acquire NMR spectra of marine sediment so I have very high concentrations of salt. I'm using a cryoprobe on a Bruker 600MHz spectrometer and I'm getting very high 90° pulse durations (˜25us) from pulsecal and I'm worried that they could damage the probe.
I have tried diluting the sample to two times the initial volume and the pulse duration goes down a bit (˜18us) but it's still way higher than the suggested 8us.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Lorenzo,
I am VERY much wondering why HSQC is a problem.
  • What I do to estimate what NMR time it takes in a 2D HSQC I do the following:
  • First acquire a 1D 1H
  • write this spectrum to a 2nd process number (e.g. wrp 2)
  • Divide the spectrum in procno 2 by 100 (dc 0.01, mulc) to accomodate for 13C natural abundance
  • superimpose this spectrum with the noise of the original 1D 1H spectrum.
Doing so you can estimate how many more scans it will take to have a signal substantially higher than noise.
  • If you need to multiply the down-scaled spectrum by 8 and it took 32 scans for the 1D 1H you will need (at least) (8*8)*32*2 scans in total in the 2D.
  • For a HSQC with 256 t1 increments this means NS has to be at least 16.
All this is of course ONLY true for small molecules where relaxation can be neglected.
In our experience matching and tuning is NOT highly affected on 13C by high salt....
Goog luck
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
Dear ResearchGate Community,
I hope this message finds you all well. My name is Michael G. , and I am a Ph.D. student. We are currently synthesizing the lipid NBD-DPPE and are facing some challenges concerning its purification, NMR sample preparation, and in need of NMR data.
  1. Purification: We're looking for effective methods to purify NBD-DPPE. Any advice regarding techniques, tips, or even literature recommendations would be greatly appreciated. In particular, we'd like to know details regarding column chromatography (mobile-phase, stationary phase, etc)
  2. NMR Sample Preparation: We would also appreciate guidance on preparing the NBD-DPPE lipid sample for NMR analysis, including the most suitable solvent system and ideal concentration. We understand that lipids can sometimes present specific challenges in NMR analysis due to their hydrophobic nature and tendency to aggregate, and so any advice on this matter would be highly valuable.
  3. NMR Data: Lastly, if anyone has NMR data of NBD-DPPE lipid and would be willing to share, this would immensely help us in validating our results and ensuring the accuracy of our product.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I look forward to any advice or suggestions the ResearchGate community may have to offer.
Best regards,
Michael G. Ph.D. Student.
Relevant answer
Answer
I can't help you with your purification or reference spectra, but we do occasionally work with comparable lipids and they tend to dissolve relatively well in methanol/chloroform mixtures.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
4 protons peak may be CH2 near a heteroatom .
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't think your question is specific enough. Where is this extra peak located for instance. What is your NMR solvent? And if you are doing a basic ester hydrolysis, what do you mean with "hydrolysis in acid NMR"?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
7 answers
How can we employ NMR spectroscopy to determine the molecular weight of polyethylene glycol (PEG)? Is it feasible to use NMR to quantify the number of monomers within the PEG chain?
Relevant answer
Answer
you should convert the alcoholic endgroups into esters by reaction with (non proton bearing) derivatisation reagents like trichloroacetic anhydrid or trichloroacetyl isocyanate. See: Polymer Bulletin 1991 , 27, 201-204
Best regards and good luck
Gerhard
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I checked NMR of commercial PGA NMR and i getting two peaks between 4.9 to 4.8.
Relevant answer
Answer
You should only be getting one peak. What is the ratio of the peaks?
Could the other peak be residual glycolide?
Does the CHCl3 peak look normal, or could the two peaks be caused by poor shimming?
Can you run a 13C spectrum to verify that you actually have two peaks?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
It is known that sample conductivity affects pulse durations in 1H NMR experiments. But how does the concentration of NaCl in a sample affects pulse durations in sodium-23 (23Na) NMR experiments? Is it the same effect as with protons?
It would be helpful if some references can be given. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Thank you Gregory J Rees!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Is it possible that the peak intensities of an MTSL-labeled protein+ligand be higher than the peak intensities of the unlabeled protein+ligand in 2D NMR? And what would that mean if it happened?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Paul,
William gave an excellent explanation...nonetheless three questions:
* Are ALL peaks in 2D (presumably 1H-15N HSQC?) affected or only a subset (in line with Williams explanation).
* How do 1D 1H (e.g. watergate) with long interscan delays (>10s) of the two samples compare?
* Have you deterined the 90° pulses for both samples? Absence or presence of salt (coming or not comping with the protein constructs) may be another explanation.
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
How can we detect the molecular weight of PEG in NMR? Is it possible to detect the number of monomers in that?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
it depends on the MW. If you can see the resonances of terminal units ( usually in polymers they have a slightly different Chemical shift) you can try to make the calculation of MW from the ratio of their integral with respect to that of the CH2 units of the polymer , Otherwise a DOSY 2D experiment may give an estimate of the molecular Diffusion from which you can derive the MW by the Stokers Einstein equation.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I analyzed my polymer sample after polymerization by NMR and GPC. The Mn that I obtained by GPC didn't match with my conversion rate obtained by NMR.
For exemple, for a PEGMA RAFT polymerization I have an average Mn at 20852 and I calculated a conversion rate at 62%. My monomer molecular weight was 500 so, normally I have to have a molecular weight around 31000 for a conversion at 62 (62*500=31000). What is the problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mathilde. This is perfectly normal. The molecular weight obtained by SEC is not actually molecular weight. The SEC instrument 'sees' the hydrodynamic volume of your polymer and reports the molecular weight relative to the hydrodynamic volume of standards that were used to calibrate the instrument. So you will always get different results when you compare molecular weights obtained from NMR and SEC. Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Does phosphorus proton coupling exist in solid phosphorus NMR?
Relevant answer
Answer
For a 1H-31P bond there will be a J-coupling, however as others have noted it will typically not be irectly observable due to the more dominant dipolar coupling (through-space).
It might be possible to measure the coupling using spin-echo based methods as shown in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2009.05.001
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Any software for this purpose?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use POKY for that (https://poky.clas.ucdenver.edu).
Poky menu -> Universal NMR Formats -> NEF chemical shifts to Sparky resonance list
Once a resonance list file is generated, it can be loaded in the project from the resonances list tab or from the resonance window (rl).
Then, you can repopulate assigned peaks using Transfer-and-Simulate tool (ta).
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hello
I wanted a thesis topic in the field of food grade nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) to work with NMR, XRD and DSC. Can you make suggestions?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can address the Effect of Solid Lipid Nanoparticle Incorporation on the Lipid Digestion Kinetics and Bioaccessibility of Encapsulated Bioactive Compounds in Food Grade Nanostructured Lipid Carriers: A NMR, XRD, and DSC Study.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
To determine the NMR yield of fluorine containing product, I need to calculate %yield from 19F NMR spectra using trifluoromethylbenzene as reference standard.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Nuruzzaman,
If the Educt has also a 19F you do not need a reference, because the ratio of the 19F signals of educt and product is the yield. NMR signals directly represent molar ratios. For 19F you may have to take care for the excitation profile of the pulse you are using. I normally place the carrier in the middle between the educt and product signal (doing so, both have the same offset effect)...
I hope this is of help!
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Dear community,
I am currently running some solvent suppression experiment on water samples. I first run a one scan 1H experiment to get the ''O1P'' and then implement it in the solvent suppression experiment (''zgpurge'' pulse program). However the water signal appears distorted, it is asymmetrical and most likely unphased (other signals appear completly fine), which results in an inefficient solvent suppression experiment. I tried to overcome the problem by performing a 3D shimming, and adjusting the phasing parameters (Autophase during the lock and calibrated the autophase offset) but the problem persisted.
What could be the origin of the problem ?
Relevant answer
Answer
I suspect this issue is related to the gradients. I would decrease the gradient strength and, or the delay after the gradient(s) to see if the resonance shape near the baseline becomes more symmetrical.
Residual vibrations caused by eddy currents contain anharmonic vibrations. The discrete FT requires the decay of all time-domain signals to be pure exponentials. But residual eddy current vibrations contain components that decay with with nonharmonic, nonperiodic modulation. The DFT can not accurately model these anharmonic signals. The problem isn’t the eddy currents, it’s that the DFT mathematically processes the anharmonic components as if they were harmonics.
The result is often an artifact in the wings of the frequency domain water-signal baseline similar to the one in your figure. Details about the impact of nonharmonic, nonperiodic water signal components can be found here: “High dynamic-range magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) time-domain signal analysis.” Hutton, W. C.; Bretthorst, G. L.; Garbow, J. R.; Ackerman, J. J., Magn Reson Med, (2009) 62, pp 1026-35.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
When I do an NMR of plain DMSO-d6 I have observed a small hump around 1.2-1.3ppm. It looks like a broad signal and am not sure as to what this signal could be assigned to. I have tried with new NMR solvent, NMR tube and also clean dry used NMR tube. All these have shown the same result. However, 13C signals correspond to DMSO-d6 only and nothing else. Was wondering if any one of the experts have any explanation to this observation, can be very helpful to me. TIA
Relevant answer
Answer
Did you notice any hump at 0.8ppm?
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
In a ligand-protein binding 2D NMR study, what does it mean when there is no chemical shifts but there's a decrease in peak intensities and an increase in linewidths?
Relevant answer
Answer
Jani Rahkila one of them is 975 g/mol and the other one is 328 g/mol.
No, I don't have access to the NMR machine at the moment.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
If the intensity of a peak is lower and/or the linewidth is higher, does it mean the specificity/affinity of the ligand is higher for that residue?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Paul,
essentially all explained by the McConnel equation https://groups.chem.ubc.ca/straus/Nlecture3.pdf
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
I've done 15N hmqc to determine the interaction between ligand-protein.
There was no chemical shifts in amino acids after adding the ligand. However, the peak heights of almost every residue were decreased in a dose dependent manner.
Could someone tell me what it means please?
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm not sure if this answer applies to 15N HMQC experiments, but in the past when we did 2-D NMR experiments to measure ligand binding to a protein by measuring chemical shift changes of peaks, a loss of multiple peak intensities was taken to mean that the ligand was binding in a non-specific manner, such as an aggregator or denaturant. Such compounds were discarded.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
To start of I am designing an HVAC system where for a laboratory application utilizing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance operating at 300 MHz.
I am well aware of the helium cooling within nitrogen shell and the liquified gases refilling. However, I'd like to know if it emits heat while operation, if there is an extraordinary environment required for operation by the device.
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
The magnet itself does not produce a significant amount of heat, but the console cabinet with all the electronics does.
Your local Bruker office (https://www.bruker.com/en/services/support/office.india-middle-east-africa.egypt-gizeh.html?technology=magnetic-resonance) can provide you a site-planning guide (or you can find one via google) with all the information you need.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
I have synthesized a Schiff base compound but everytime I do NMR I found an aldehyde peak of intensity 0.20 or 0.25 like that. I have tried column, recrystallization, solvent wash but couldn't get the clean NMR of the final product.
Relevant answer
Answer
Robin is correct. The Schiff base is always an equilibrium and must be reduced (e.g., cyanoborohydrin) to create a permanent imine. You have to use an aprotic solvent (e.g., acetonitrile) to trap the Schiff base. There is also a byproduct urea that forms that is 1 Da off in mass.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
I am looking for a good reference for 1-13C NMR peaks for Beta-hmb (beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate), and alpha-HIC (alpha-hydroxyisocaprate). I have not been able to find a single experimental instance of 1 carbon Beta-HMB, or aplha-HIC; however, this experimental data is important for proving a hypothesis in a paper I am working on.
Relevant answer
Answer
Without knowing the specific structures of the two chemicals in question, it is impossible to predict the exact positions of the 13C NMR peaks. The position of 13C NMR peaks depends on the unique chemical environment surrounding each carbon atom in the molecule, which is determined by the arrangement of other atoms, the type of functional groups present, and the hybridization of the carbon atom.
However, as a general guide, here are some typical 13C NMR chemical shift ranges for various types of carbon atoms in organic compounds:
  • Alkanes: 0-50 ppm
  • Alkenes: 100-140 ppm
  • Aromatics: 110-160 ppm
  • Alkynes: 60-90 ppm
  • Carboxylic acids: 160-180 ppm
  • Esters: 160-180 ppm
  • Ketones: 190-220 ppm
  • Amides: 160-180 ppm
It should be noted that these are only general trends and chemical shifts may vary depending on the specific compound and the context of the carbon atom in question. A detailed interpretation of 13C NMR spectra requires careful analysis of the entire spectrum, as well as knowledge of the specific chemical structures being analyzed.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
for my research project, I am doing synthesis with polymer (PEG) and I confirm the formation of the product via NMR. But for me, I don't really trust NMR and it cannot confirm me the formation of my product based on:
- esterification of PEG-OH with acid compound (step 1)
- imine formation (schiff base reaction-step 2)
So I tried to do FT-IR to see the peaks of COO and C=N in my second product. And it is still unclear for me. My spectrum are really strange.
For the formation of imine (step 2) I see the shift in NMR, characteristic to the formation of CH=N (literature) but for me I need more data to confirm it.
Furthermore, I have some additional peaks (not supposed to be here) with high content of protons. So I think my product is not pure....
So I have 3 questions:
1) in FT-IR, how can I confirm the conjugation of OH and COOH (ester) in my synthesis 1
2) in FT-IR, how can I confirm the C=N bond (synthesis 2)
2) For impurities in NMR, what are the options to remove it ?
Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
1)answer 1: first time, please obtained FT-IR of the monomer (which monomer of your obtained polymer), and then In FT-IR, the presence of a peak around 1700-1750 cm-1 can indicate the formation of an ester bond. This peak corresponds to the carbonyl stretching vibration of the C=O bond in the ester group. Additionally, you can also look for a peak around 1100-1050-1100-1300 cm-1, which corresponds to the C-O-C stretching vibration in the ester group.
2)n FT-IR, the presence of a peak around 1600-1700 cm-1 can indicate the formation of a C=N bond, carbonyl bond. This peak corresponds to the stretching vibration of the C=N bond in the imine group. Additionally, you can also look for a peak around 3300-3500 cm-1 screeching and Overton of this, 1400- 1500- 1450 cm-1, which corresponds to the N-H stretching vibration in the imine group.
  1. To remove impurities in NMR, you have a few options:
  • You can try re-dissolving your sample in a different solvent to see if the impurities are solvent-dependent.
  • You can try using a different purification method, such as column chromatography or recrystallization. or other solvent and please check your compound is dry.
  • If the impurities are water-soluble, you can try washing your sample with water to remove them. please dry your sample
  • cheek resolved and precipitate 3 times.
  • If you can not answer about purification
  • please check your monomer or the first material you used that
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
I am running an MD simulation on a protein-protein complex.
After seeing a similar question on research gate, I checked the amino acids rtp file in my force fields folder, and as expected from this error, the HD1 atom was not present in the HSE entry. The atom HD2 is however present in that entry. So I figured replacing the HD1 atoms in my PDB file with HD2 should solve the error.
And it did. For the time being.
To reaffirm, I made changes in Histidine's hydrogen atoms in the PDB file. When I went ahead with the energy minimization step, I got an error that said there's an Infinite Force on an atom. It turns out that the atom was "HD2" of some Histidine in the PDB file.
I saw online that the reason behind this error was due to atom overlap. Hence, just for seeing if that was the case for me, I changed the coordinates of that atom a little bit (this was just for checking, I can't do this for the actual work). When I ran the EM step again, I got the same error, but for a HD2 of a different Histidine molecule. So yes, overlapping of the atoms is the reason for this particular error. I cannot solve it by changing coordinates of all the HD2 atoms of the Histidines. So it all boils down to the main fatal error that I mentioned.
How do I approach this?
1. Changing the atom name (as in HD1 -> HD2 is not working due to the subsequent error)
2. I do not know if I should add the atom HD1 in the HSE entry in the rtp file (I tried this and got several warnings).
3. I cannot (or should I?) use -ignh because mine is not an NMR structure. I have modelled my proteins on Modeller and refined them online.
Any suggestions/solutions will help me a lot. Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, a crude measure is to use -ignh during pdb2gmx, it will rebuild all the H-atoms based on the force field you are using. Most of the time, it is a reasonable choice (though not always), as the H-atoms are mostly absent in crystallographic structure (as it is difficult to resolve h-atom positions).
Histidine is unique in the sense that its side chain offers multiple h-bonds at physiological pH. The better procedure is to check which heavy atom of His side chain is forming H-bond in the protein (either it is delta or epsilon), and rename your His residues accordingly (HIS, HIE, HID, please check your FF how these residues are named there).
"2. I do not know if I should add the atom HD1 in the HSE entry in the rtp file (I tried this and got several warnings)." > Try not to mess with rtp entry at this stage (as you are very new), and if you like to play around, just make a backup of FF directory and do as you like.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Hi,
i am starting my master thesis And I am doing polymer synthesis following by precipitation method (dissolution in solvent, non solvent precipitation, centrifugation) repeated 2-3 times. I have some impurities in my NMR analysis.
So I want to know if precipitation method in cold ethyl ether is enough to purify a polymer chain ? if yes, it the best procedure to do a good purification through This method?
Example: addition drop by drop is important ? Stirring fast also ?
Is it better than soxhlet extraction ?
Another suestion regarding the purity of final product. Is GPC can confirm the formation of product ? How can I confirm clearly that the reaction work and the product is formed (in complement with NMR) ?
thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Saya Bird,
the purification depends on the polymer and the side products/impurities, which you want to remove.
Additional purification methods might be following:
Dialysis; I used this to remove some salts, which could leave the polymer solution through the membrane of the dialysis tube, whereas the polymer remained in the tube.
Fractionated precipitation: I used this to separate blockcopolymers from homopolymers or different moecular weight fractions of the same polymer from each other. You add a non solvent to a polymer solution and the less soluble polymer (depending on their chemistry in the case of block copolymer) or the polymer with the higher molecular weight (in the case of different molecular weights) precipitates first as a polymer gel.
There are also methods, that require more elaborate equipment, like preparative GPC or separation by LCCC.
If your separation does not remove the impurities, maybe add the solvent slower (drop by drop, as you mentioned) and use another solvent (or non-solvent). Maybe you polymer precipitates so easily, that the impurities are trapped in your solid polymer. If the polymer precipitates slower the impurities may stay dissolved (similar to the case of fractionated precipitation).
The confirmation of your product also depends on the polymer. Maybe some groups on your monomer were changed by the polymerization, which could be detected by IR-spectroscopy.
For the chracterization of polyurethanes (as an example), remaining isocyanate groups can be titrated.
If you use a new method to obtain a known polymer, you can also compare it's properties with literature values (i.e. the glass transition temperature via DSC) to get a hint if the reaction might have worked.
There are plenty of complex and simple methods to characterize a polymer, but it depends on your polymer if you can use them.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
16 answers
A reaction of A and B, gives C. the NMR of reaction mixture contain all peaks of A,B,C. I need to calculate yield or percentage conversion of B to C. A has no role . Yield of C need to calculate with respect to B. all have distinguish peaks. On integration, specific peak of C has 1.00 while B has 0.35. both contain 2 hydrogens each. Can I say yield of C is 1/1.35 *100= 74% ? Or is there any other methods to calculate the yield ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Carlos F. Marcos
- ERETIC2 and QUANTAS are both software approaches based on the PULCON method of Wider et al. (J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Mar 1;128(8):2571-6. doi: 10.1021/ja055336t). Note that the original ERETIC (Akoka et al.) is a hardware-based approach and may not be suitable. QUANTAS reference: Magn Reson Chem. 2010 Oct;48(10):753-62. doi: 10.1002/mrc.2647. PMID: 20803488.
There is no reason why these approaches can't be used in a benchtop NMR.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hello
I wanted a thesis topic in the field of food grade nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) to work with NMR, XRD and DSC. Can you make suggestions?
Relevant answer
Answer
tes
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Hello everybody,
I am getting output from ORCA program for NMR chemical shifts in the form of Anisotropic and Isotropic shielding in ppm units for both reference and standard(TMS). So, how can I compare these values with experimental chemical shifts of sample? I am attaching here my ORCA output file also.
Thank you.
Shravan B Rathod
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
11 answers
I have been studying a dynamic protein and have selectively labelled a cysteine for 19F NMR. This cysteine has two peaks corresponding to a major and minor conformation. On a 500-MHz spectrometer, the relative populations are roughly 4:1. After I switched to a 700-MHz spectrometer, the relative populations are now roughly 2:1. I have confirmed that this is not a one-time fluke. Can a higher operating frequency enhance the minor population with respect to the major population?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear William,
Here is a good website explaining the T1 dependence with magnetic field and including references.
It focuses on 1H, but gives a good general idea.
Best,
Maxime
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Hello Everyone,
I did an initial test with F19NMR but my peaks in -CF3 part were overlapped.
My sample was a combination of 4 standard solutions of C4F7COOH, C6F11COOH, C8F15COOH and C10F19COOH which was 100uL plus 100 uL of deuterum MeOH and 800 uL of normal MeOH. I applied 400 NeoNMR which has a specific prob for NMR.
My conclusion is that I have to apply higher frequency like 600MHz or 900 MHZ.
Please let me know if you have any ideas to get a clear signal with this method.
I appreciate any assistance.
Faranak
Relevant answer
Answer
Since the molecular weights of the components of your mixture are significantly different, you may try 19F DOSY to distinguish the 19F signals of CF3 groups. See, for example, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/cc/c6cc02917e
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
I need to use 27Al NMR for liquid sample and i whant to know if quartz NMR tube have lower backgroud than NMR glass tube.
If someone know how to reduce the bacground noise let me know.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
To complement Clemens answer, I would like to mention backward linear prediction, which is a standard procedure in almost all NMR processing software packages. It helped me a lot for measuring 11B NMR spectra using standard (non-quartz) NMR tubes.
Good luck,
Vladimir
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
Is it possible to suggest a title (Biophysics of food) that includes all three NMR SAXS DSC devices?
Relevant answer
Answer
In my suggestion the title may be " Characterization of Food materials for their quality"
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
Hi all,
Attached below is the proton nmr spectra of biodiesel. The integration value of peak at 5.2 ppm is set to 1. and corresponding all other integration values are obtained. Is that right .
From there. I'm calculating the yield of biodiesel by using integration values at 3.6 and 2.3 ppm.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Alisha,
to answer the question I (we) need to know the reaction-scheme.
Was it a trans-esterification of glycerol-esters? If this is the case I'd guess that the signal at 3.6 is the O-CH3 of the product (which you have divide by 3, as described above) and the signal at 5.2 might be one hydrogen of the glycerol in the educt. And I(O-CH3)/3/I(educt) would be the molar ratio of product/educt (which is not the necessarily the yield!). But this might be wrong if my "hand-wavy" assignment is wrong.
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I can find the NMR information of purplad&aldehyde adduct in . However, it is very hard to find the mass spectrum characterization of the purpald&formaldehyde in literature. Who has the relevant publication? Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Do you have a Scifinder or reaxys access? They both have very good structure and substructure search masks, so if there is a mass spectrum in a good journal, they should hopefully find it.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
I have prepared some derivatives of the Copper 8-Hydroxyquinoline complex. It has very low solubility in the DMSO, DMF, and CDCl3. In such a scenario, having a paramagnetic Cu2+ in the structure, How to record an NMR spectrum of the Copper 8-Hydroxyquinoline complex and its derivatives?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Prasad,
Cu2+ usually increase T1 relaxation but not really T2 relaxation (which would be bad). This means you can reduce the D1 delay to reduce measurementtime. Otherwise it should be fine to record 1H experiments, but no garantee. to determine the T1 relaxation and teherefore the d1 delay time you can use the parameterset 1HsatrecT1. after recording you can click on "Applications->Dynamics->Prepare for Dynamics Center" and than again at the same button Saying "Dynamics Center" and the result should pop up. If you have installed the free of charge Bruker Dynamics Center on yur computer.
Many Greetings,
Kristof
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
Hello scientific community,
Although I have a very specific question related to a very specific equipment, I hope that I will find some answers and/or orientations.
I am actually trying to operate a Bruker Prodigy Cryoprobe, but I am facing some technical issues related to the failure of the cooldown process. I cannot achieve it as the system tells that the cooldown is too slow. What could be the reason for this? Are you using this kind of equipment Flawlessly? What is your experience with this kind of cryoprobe? are they reliable, and robust ?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ahmad,
Thank you for your detailed answer, I eventually managed to solve the problem with the aid of Bruker technician. The problem was due to an insufficient cooling because of a bad vaccum in the liquid nitrogen transfer line, I just had to redo it.
Many thanks.
Salem
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
If i take a crude nmr of my reaction mixture containing one reactant and product without adding any internal standard , is it possible to calculate yield of product integrating distinguish peaks of reactant and product?
Relevant answer
Answer
It depends what level of accuracy you require. In simple terms, identify a signal from your product and one from your reactant, integrate and normalise these for the number of protons that they represent and these numbers will give you the molar ratios of the product and reactant. There is no need for an internal standard in this case.
There are caveats. This method assumes that your reactant only produces product and that there are no by-products. If there are by products then you could also integrate signals from these. Alternatively, use a reference signal such as ERETIC2 or QUANTAS and this will allow you to quantify independently.
If you require accurate results, then you need to follow William C Hutton's comments about signal-to-noise, etc. - particularly relaxation delays!
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
1 answer
HI, I've started ti learn using JMRUI to analyse NMR spectroscopy signals. I completely don't know how to use AMARES quantitation or any other type of quantitation. I have to determine the concentration of metabolites in the spectrum derived from the human brain. I have watched tutorials on youtube, but during them, there are used some databases .sv type to make quantitation and I don't where can I find something like that?
I really beg for help
Best regards,
Aleksandra
Relevant answer
Answer
The time domain quantification of metabolite signals was conducted using AMARES algorithm with custom prior knowledge.Metabolite concentrations were reported for tCr (creatine plus phosphocreatine), NAA (N-acetyl-aspartate), tCho (phosphocholine and glycerophosphocholine), Ins (myoinositol) and Glx (glutamate and glutamine). The AMARES prior knowledge model consisted of peaks for NAA, choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), glutamate + glutamine (Glx) and myoinositol (Ins). The amplitudes of NAA, Cho, Cr, Glx, and Ins peak were estimated by the algorithm. The relative phases of NAA, Cho, Cr, Glx, and Ins peak were fixed at 0. The linewidth of NAA was estimated by the algorithm, and the linewidths of the remaining peaks were set to be equal to that of NAA. The frequencies of NAA, Cho, Cr, Glx, and Ins peak were estimated by AMARES. All peak shapes were fixed at Lorentzian.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
8 answers
I need a solvent to be able to take NMR test from my samples PET-PBT blend. I will really appreciate if you can help me. I already tried DMSO, Chloroform, Water, and Ethanol.
Relevant answer
Answer
you can use CF3COOD/CDCl3 (2/1 v/v)
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
2 answers
I have two small characteristic peaks in the NMR spectrum showing negative integration values. I would appreciate it if you could share your opinion.
Relevant answer
Dear David Stephenson, Thank you for the tips. They worked.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
Usually, it provides a singlet at 5.37 ppm in 1H NMR spectroscopy. But i got one NMR with two singlets at 5.21 and 5.44 ppm. Did they belong to CH2of benzoyl benzoate, or could it be something else??? Please shed light on this issue. Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks a lot for your precious suggestions.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
I am trying to prepare Indigo using Baeyer–Drewson method. However, the NMR spectrum in DMSO shows the presence of a side product along with Indigo. How can i purify the material
Relevant answer
Answer
Nitika Grover hope this helps.
US5116997A - Purification of indigo - Google Patents
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
3 answers
Can plz anyone help me to calculate J-coupling constant for the given NMR spectra?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Lubna Afroz a conclusive analysis and answer to your question can only be given if the splitting pattern of your signals is clearly perceptible. This is not the case with your illustration. Swapnamoy Ganguly , I do not agree with your analysis for two reasons: (1) you cannot be sure that the signals are "triplets" or "quartets" (I doubt about that) and hence the calculation is questionable; (2) coupling constants larger than 20 Hz are very rare, not to say unlikely for organic compounds.
Moreover, applying a line broadenig factor of 1 Hz is not really helpful for most proton spectra, and the integral labels look very strange to me (as there are four regions of relative intensity 2 but only three peaks groups of appropriate size). Please check everything.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am trying to analyze the stability of DYBP (2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di(tert butyl peroxy)hexyne-3). It is 85% and comes dissolved in mineral oil. What technique would work the best apart from NMR? Would GC-MS or HPLC with reverse phase work?
Relevant answer
Answer
A stable derivative of the compound is made using a chemical like TMS or equivalent which then will not undergo further decomposition during the chromatography step (eg. ). Alternatively, you could quantify the increasing degradation products and infer the remaining amount of parent compound.
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
5 answers
What is the equation for determination of DPn or molecular weight of polybutylene succinate (the polymer was prepared by polycondensation of diol and diacid) from NMR spectroscopy?
TIA
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Fatima,
without a clear terminal (or close-to-terminal as Clemens mentioned) signal with a defined number of atoms per polymer contributing to the NMR signal it is not possible!
The integral of a NMR signal is given by
(molar concentration of a polymer)*(number of atoms in this polymer)
Thus half of the molar concentration of the polymer with twice the number of monomers unit (double MW) will lead to the same integral.
An estimate of MW may be obtained by measuring diffusion (DOSY technique) coefficient D. But you will need (several) reference polymers of same type/chemistry and known MWs for calibration
...or you find something useful in literature.
A rough estimate of the MW may be "guessed" if you only have one MW reference by a polymer-scaling law - to my remembering D(MW)~MW^(3/5) for unstructured polymers. But please check this!
If you have MW references there are more simple (SEC, gel-filtration) chromatography methods.
Good luck
Alfred
  • asked a question related to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Question
6 answers
In a 19F-NMR spectrum, the chemical shifts are usually negative. Therefore, does "upfield" become leftward movement towards zero, or does it still refer to rightward movement, but now becoming more negative?
Relevant answer
Answer
Wolfgang's answer is absolutely correct in every respect. That said, I still struggle with alternatives to upfield and downfield. Try putting the alternatives into a descriptive sentence. You can't very well say that a signal is "higher" than another signal as this could refer to its intensity. You could say that it is "higher frequency" than another signal but the chemical shift scale is dimensionless (it is normally described in "ppm") so this perhaps isn't truly valid either unless your scale is in Hz. I've been told that "to higher ppm" or "to lower ppm" is valid but it is ungainly and counter-intuitive as people tend to thing of higher being to the right and lower to the left (which is the opposite of the delta ppm scale). Perhaps we should go back to tau where TMS comes at 10ppm... (only joking).