Neural Networks and Artificial Intelligence - Science topic

I'm curious to know what you think about this? This kind of solution based on an intelligent publication search system and an intelligent content analysis system of retrieved publications on an online scientific portal could be of great help to researchers and scientists. In my opinion, the creation of a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built solely on the basis of online scientific knowledge bases, online scientific portals and online scientific publication indexing databases makes sense if basic issues of copyright respect are met and such tools use continuously updated and objectively and scientifically verified knowledge, data and information resources. With such a solution, researchers and scientists conducting research on a specific topic would have the opportunity to review the literature within the millions of scientific publications collected on specific online scientific portals and scientific publication indexing databases. Besides, what is particularly important, the mentioned partially automated literature review would probably be realized in a relatively short time. Thus, an intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications would, in a short period of time, from among the millions of texts archived in specific scientific publication indexing databases, select those publications in which other researchers and scientists have described analogous, similar, related, correlated, related, etc. issues, results of scientific research conducted, selected publications within the same scientific discipline, the same topic or in the interdisciplinary field. Besides, an intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications could also categorize the retrieved publications into those in which other researchers and scientists confirmed analogous conclusions of conducted similar research, polemicized with the results of other researchers' research on a specific topic, obtained other results from conducted research, suggested other practical applications of obtained research results realized on the same or similar topic, etc. However, for ethical reasons and properly conducted research, i.e., respecting the research results of other researchers and scientists, it would be unacceptable for this kind of intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of many publications available on specific databases for indexing scientific publications to enable plagiarism, i.e., to provide research results, provide retrieved content on specific issues and topics, etc., without accurately providing the source of the data, description of the source data, names of the authors of the publications, etc., and some unreliable researchers would take advantage of this opportunity. This kind of intelligent system for searching and analyzing the content of scientific publications should give for all searched publications full bibliographic descriptions, source descriptions, footnotes containing all the data that are necessary to develop full source footnotes for possible citation of specific studies, research results, theses, data, etc. contained in other publications written by other researchers and scientists. So, building this kind of intelligent tool would make sense if ChatGPT-type tools were properly improved and the system of laws for their use appropriately supplemented so that the use of ChatGPT-type tools does not violate copyrights and that these tools are used in accordance with ethics and do not generate misinformation. Improving these tools so that they do not generate disinformation, do not create "fictitious facts" in the form of descriptions, essays, photos, videos, etc. containing nicely described, presented never and nowhere seemingly facts is to keep Big Data systems updated, update data sets and information, based on which they create answers to questions, create descriptions, photos, companies and so on. This is important because current online tools like ChatGPT often create "nicely described fictitious facts," which is used to generate fake news and misinformation in online social media. When all that I have written above would be corrected and the use completed, and not only in some parts of the world but on a global scale, then the creation of a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built solely on the basis of online scientific knowledge bases, online scientific portals and online indexing databases of scientific publications would make sense and could prove helpful to people, including researchers and scientists. Besides, the current online ChatGPT-type tools are not perfect, as they draw data not directly in real-time online from specific databases and knowledge contained in selected websites and portals, but draw information, knowledge, data from an offline database created some time ago. For example, currently the most popular ChatGPT still relies on a database of data, information, etc. contained in many publication texts downloaded from selected websites and web portals but not today or yesterday downloaded only in 2021! So these are data and information already outdated on many issues. Hence the absurdities, inconsistencies with the facts, creation of "fictitious facts" by ChatGPT in a significant part of the answers generated by this system to questions asked by Internet users. In view of the above, in a number of issues, both technological, organizational, formal, normative, etc., such intelligent systems should be improved so that they can be used in open access in the applications I wrote about above.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hello people, I have a dataset of inhibitors as binary labels ( Zeros - Inactive , Ones - Active ). I have my ML/AI model working, now I would like to know how many are the best inhibitors out of these. Could anyone help me what should I do and what can be done to resolve my problems?

TIA

#DrugDesign #ML #AI #DataScience #DrugDiscovery

All these terms are so confusing! I want to understand these terminologies in a very crisp and simplified manner. Can someone help me out with this confusion explaining their differences and real life examples? Any authorized books of reputed publishers? Thanks in advance.

How to create a system of digital, universal labelling of different types of works, texts, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, innovations, patents, etc. performed by artificial intelligence and not by humans, i.e. works whose legal, ethical, moral, business, security qualification .... etc. should be different for what is the product of artificial intelligence?

Two days earlier, in an earlier post, I started a discussion on the question of the necessity of improving the security of the development of artificial intelligence technology and asked the following questions: how should the system of institutional control of the development of advanced artificial intelligence models and algorithms be structured, so that this development does not get out of control and lead to negative consequences that are currently difficult to foresee? Should the development of artificial intelligence be subject to control? And if so, who should exercise this control? How should an institutional system for controlling the development of artificial intelligence applications be built? Why are the creators of leading technology companies developing ICT, Internet technologies, Industry 4.0, including those developing artificial intelligence technologies, etc. now calling for the development of this technology to be periodically, deliberately slowed down, so that the development of artificial intelligence technology is fully under control and does not get out of hand? On the other hand, while continuing my reflections on the indispensability of improving the security of the development of artificial intelligence technology, analysing the potential risks of the dynamic and uncontrolled development of this technology, I hereby propose to continue my deliberations on this issue and invite you to participate in a discussion aimed at identifying the key determinants of building an institutional control system for the development of artificial intelligence, including the development of advanced models composed of algorithms similar or more advanced to the ChatGPT 4.0 system developed by the OpenAI company and available on the Internet. It is necessary to normatively regulate a number of issues related to artificial intelligence, both the issue of developing advanced models composed of algorithms that form artificial intelligence systems; posting these technological solutions in open access on the Internet; enabling these systems to carry out the process of self-improvement through automated learning of new content, knowledge, information, abilities, etc.; building an institutional system of control over the development of artificial intelligence technology and current and future applications of this technology in various fields of activity of people, companies, enterprises, institutions, etc. operating in different sectors of the economy. Recently, realistic-looking photos of well-known, highly recognisable people, including politicians, presidents of states in unusual situations, which were created by artificial intelligence, have appeared on the Internet on online social media sites. What has already appeared on the Internet as a kind of 'free creativity' of artificial intelligence, creativity both in terms of the creation of 'fictitious facts' in descriptions of events that never happened, in descriptions created as an answer to a question posed for the ChatGPT system, and in terms of photographs of 'fictitious events', already indicates the potentially enormous scale of disinformation currently developing on the Internet, and this is thanks to the artificial intelligence systems whose products of 'free creativity' find their way onto the Internet. With the help of artificial intelligence, in addition to texts containing descriptions of 'fictitious facts', photographs depicting 'fictitious events', it is also possible to create films depicting 'fictitious events' in cinematic terms. All of these creations of 'free creation' by artificial intelligence can be posted on social media and, in the formula of viral marketing, can spread rapidly on the Internet and can thus be a source of serious disinformation realised potentially on a large scale. Dangerous opportunities have therefore arisen for the use of technology to generate disinformation about, for example, a competitor company, enterprise, institution, organisation or individual. Within the framework of building an institutional control system for the development of artificial intelligence technology, it is necessary to take into account the issue of creating a digital, universal marking system for the various types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, films, innovations, patents, etc. performed by artificial intelligence and not by humans, i.e. works whose legal, ethical, moral, business, security qualification ..., should be different for what is the product of artificial intelligence. It is therefore necessary to create a system of digital, universal labelling of the various types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, etc., made by artificial intelligence and not by humans. The only issue for discussion is therefore how this should be done.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Currently and prospectively, generative artificial intelligence, a ChatGPT-type language model, is finding various applications helpful in analyses carried out for business purposes. ChatGPT can be helpful, for example, in quickly drawing up a competitive analysis against a specific company, enterprise, start-up or other type of business entity. This kind of real-time analysis can be helpful in the effective management of a business entity. However, an issue for the time being may be the outdatedness of the data and information contained in the database that ChatGPT uses to answer questions. The aforementioned database is a kind of Big Data database built from data and information collected from a selection of multiple websites, but not now only in 2021. Large corporations, including large technology companies, have the financial capacity to create research and development departments within their company structures, where they develop technological innovations, new technologies, technology standards, etc., in order to be technologically at the forefront and maintain their strong position in specific markets. Consequently, large technology companies also have an interest in ensuring that emerging new technologies and innovations are quickly incorporated into their business. This also applies to the currently developing Industry 4.0 technologies, including machine learning, deep learning and artificial intelligence. On the other hand, companies and enterprises operating in the SME sector, including above all micro-enterprises and start-ups, have much more limited financial possibilities to finance the creation of research and development departments within their organisations, where new technologies, innovations and technological standards would be created. Of course, SME companies are also interested in incorporating new technological solutions and innovations into their businesses. However, the new technologies that they implement are not mainly the result of their research activities, but are bought and then implemented as ready-made solutions, already proven technologies or patents applied in other companies. However, some technological solutions for new technologies and/or specific applied and open-access technological solutions for information Internet services are also available for use by companies and enterprises operating in the SME sector already in the early stages of business development and with relatively small financial investments. For example, these are the Internet-accessible new online media, social media and online information services offered by large Internet-based technology companies, which have created specific standards in the implementation of certain Industry 4.0 technologies and have established a strong position in the market for certain online information and other services. Consequently, the currently rapidly developing artificial intelligence technology, including specific solutions of it made available on the Internet such as ChatGPT, can be used in specific business development support applications by various types of business entities, including companies and enterprises in the SME sector. For example, ChatGPT can be used in carrying out market and other analyses that are helpful in managing a business entity also operating in the SME sector. However, the applicability of both this kind of shared technological tool, a kind of language model of generative artificial intelligence made available on the Internet under an open access formula, and other technological solutions of artificial intelligence, which will probably soon be offered by the technology companies creating them, is much greater.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please answer,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The development of artificial intelligence may in the future lead to the creation of digital surrogates that mimic thought processes, artificial consciousness, emotional intelligence, etc. Many technology companies developing their business on the basis of new information technologies and Industry 4.0, which are being created and implemented in business, are conducting research to create new generations of artificial intelligence, which will be enriched with thought processes, artificial consciousness, emotional intelligence, etc. Some large technology companies that are also active online are working on creating their equivalents of generative artificial intelligence built in an advanced language model as ChatGPT. Internet users, companies and institutions are currently exploring the possibilities of practical applications of ChatGPT. The generation of this tool currently available online is already the fourth ChatGPT 4.0, but this is probably not the end of the development of this technology and its applications. In addition to this, some technology companies that are at the forefront of the development of artificial intelligence technology using various machine learning and deep learning solutions in conjunction with access to large sets of information and data collected on Big Data platforms are teaching artificial intelligence to perform various activities, jobs, solving increasingly complex tasks that until now have only been performed by humans. As part of these learning processes and the continual technological advances within ICT and Industry 4.0, leading technology companies are attempting to create a highly advanced artificial intelligence that will be capable of carrying out what we know as thought processes that have so far only taken place in the human brain (and perhaps in some animals). Perhaps in the future, an artificial intelligence will be created that is capable of simulating, digitally generating what we call human emotions, emotional intelligence. Perhaps in the future, an artificial intelligence will be created equipped with digitally generated artificial consciousness. What if, in the future, autonomous robots are created that are equipped not only with artificial intelligence, but also with digitally generated reactions that symbolise human emotions, are equipped with digitally generated thought processes, are equipped with artificial consciousness and behave as if they are also equipped with artificial emotional intelligence? Perhaps this will happen in the future. But the solutions that are currently being developed and the increasing applications of artificial intelligence that are emerging are devoid of typically human characteristics, i.e. thought processes within the framework of, among other things, abstract thinking, are devoid of emotional intelligence, human emotions and feelings, consciousness and so on. Will the rapidly developing artificial intelligence technology and also the rapidly appearing new and more numerous different applications of artificial intelligence technology solve many problems or will more new problems be generated? Perhaps a kind of thinking artificial intelligence will soon emerge, but one that does not have human feelings, e.g. empathy, in addition to having no digital equivalent of emotional intelligence. New applications for this kind of enhanced artificial intelligence will probably quickly emerge. Will it then be associated with the possibility of solving a multitude of problems, or could this kind of AI development generate new risks and dangers for humans? Technology companies pursuing this kind of technological advancement and improved artificial intelligence assume that a thinking artificial intelligence without human feelings can be a more effective 'employee' in a company. On the other hand, a thinking artificial intelligence being a more efficient and effective 'employee' may perhaps also be a more dangerous tool employed by a competitive company. The developers of these technological solutions usually start from the assumption that the development of artificial intelligence technology will help in the field of management of business entities, public institutions, financial institutions, etc. and will help to achieve the strategic business objectives of certain commercially operating companies and enterprises and perhaps also public sector institutions. However, we do not know whether this will be the case, whether the technological advances taking place in the field of artificial intelligence, the emergence of new generations of these technologies will generate only safe and positive applications for people, or whether new risks and threats will also emerge.

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to the discussion of scientific issues and not the ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

In view of the above, I address the following questions to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The progressive digitization of data and archived documents, digitization of data transfer processes, Internetization of communications, economic processes but also of research and analytical processes is becoming a typical feature of today's developing developed economies. Currently, another technological revolution is taking place, described as the fourth and in some aspects it is already the fifth technological revolution. Particularly rapidly developing and finding more and more applications are technologies categorized as Industry 4.0/5.0. These technologies, which support research and analytical processes carried out in various institutions and business entities, include Big Data Analytics and artificial intelligence. The computational capabilities of microprocessors, which are becoming more and more perfect and processing data faster and faster, are successively increasing. The processing of ever-larger sets of data and information is growing. Databases of data and information extracted from the Internet and processed in the course of conducting specific research and analysis processes are being created. In connection with this, the possibilities for the application of Big Data Analytics supported by artificial intelligence technology in terms of improving research techniques, in terms of increasing the efficiency of the research and analytical processes used so far, in terms of improving the scientific research being conducted, are also growing rapidly.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think on this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

On my profile of the Research Gate portal you can find several publications on Big Data issues. I invite you to scientific cooperation in this problematic area.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In my opinion, it makes sense to create a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built solely on the basis of continuously updated data, information, objectively verified knowledge resources, a kind of online business advisor, using defined business websites and portals, financial and economic information portals, which will answer the questions of entrepreneurs, businessmen, managers in charge of companies and enterprises, who will ask questions about the future development of their business, their company, enterprise, corporation. Such intelligent systems drawing on large data and information resources, processing large sets of economic and financial information and data in real time on Big Data Analytics platforms, providing current analytical data to business intelligence systems supporting business management processes, can prove very useful as tools to facilitate organizational management processes, forecasting various scenarios of abnormal events and scenarios of developments in the business environment, diagnosing escalation of risks, supporting early warning systems, diagnosing and forecasting opportunities and threats to the development of the company or enterprise, providing warning signals for contingency and risk management systems.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

There is a growing body of data suggesting that innovative startups may be created using the next generation of ChatGPT-like smart tools and/or whose business activities would be helped by such smart tools and/or certain new business concepts would be based on such smart tools. On the one hand, there are already emerging Internet startups based on artificial intelligence systems specialized in specific areas of creating textual, graphic, video, etc. elaborations that are variants of something similar to ChatGPT. On the other hand, arguably, some of these kinds of solutions may in the future turn into a kind of online business advisors generating advice for entrepreneurs developing new innovative startups.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

This "philosophical" thought by Rabelais "Wisdom cannot enter into an evil spirit, and Science without conscience is but ruin of the soul", taken from Pantagruel, his major work (own translation from French), can be considered as the keystone of what would be called "Scientific Morality". What if we discuss this paramount issue for the scientific community? Contributions on the topic are welcome.

Science is a neutral, rigorous, systematic endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. Modern science is typically divided into three major branches: natural sciences (e.g., biology, chemistry, and physics), which study the physical world; the social sciences (e.g., economics, psychology, and sociology), which study individuals and societies; and the formal sciences (e.g., logic, mathematics, and theoretical computer science), which study formal systems, governed by axioms and rules".

Excerpt from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

"Conscience” translates the Latin “conscientia”, which refers to sharing “knowledge” (scientia) “with” (con-), and which in turns translates the equivalent Greek term suneidenai (see Pierce 1955 and Sorabji 2014 for an etymological analysis of the term). The literal meaning of the term does not specify the type of knowledge involved and whom that knowledge is shared with. However, the concept has traditionally been used to refer to moral knowledge (we talk indifferently of conscience and moral conscience) that is shared with oneself. This reference to the self does not rule out that the source of the morality in question be external to the self. ... Reference to the self indicates that, from a psychological point of view, conscience involves introspection, awareness of one’s behavior, and self-assessment..."

Excerpt from: " Conscience (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conscience/ 1/16, First published Mar 14, 2016

In my opinion, it makes sense to create a new generation of something similar to ChatGPT, which will use databases built exclusively on the basis of continuously updated data, information, objectively verified knowledge resources, and which will use exclusively those Internet databases, knowledge bases, portals and websites that individual Internet users themselves will select, define, define. This kind of solution, which would allow personalization of the functionality of such generative artificial intelligence systems, would significantly increase its functionality for individual users, Internet users, citizens. In addition, the scale of innovative solutions for practical applications of such personalized intelligent systems for analyzing content and data contained in selected specific Internet resources would increase significantly.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The theoretical basis for the concept of the essence of artificial intelligence has been developing since the 1960s. Since then, black scenarios of futurological visions, in which autonomous robots equipped with artificial intelligence will be able to reproduce themselves, self-improve, become independent of human control and become a threat to humans, have been created in literature and film of the genre of scence fiction. Nowadays, in the situation of dynamic development of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies, the above-mentioned considerations return to topicality.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In the current era of rapidly developing information technology, the technology of Industry 4. 0, the era of the fourth or perhaps already fifth technological revolution, in the situation of rapidly developing artificial intelligence technologies, building more and more perfect robots and androids, which, equipped with artificial intelligence, can perform a variety of activities until recently performed only by humans and until recently widely recognized as such, which only humans can perform, many new concepts are emerging, full of admiration for the modern technology of new applications of artificial intelligence, but also many new or well-known for many years but now growing in importance concerns about the development of artificial intelligence, including concerns about the consideration of the possibility in the future that the development of artificial intelligence will escape human control. In the context of, on the one hand, admiration and, on the other hand, concerns about the effects and directions of artificial intelligence development in the future, new intriguing questions are emerging. New questions, which, having the character of intriguing questions, activating creative reflection, motivating critical thinking, play a special role in the development of science. For example, this kind of question:

Imagine the situation that a new different but much more perfect version of something similar to ChatGPT is built, for which each person can ask only one question, what would this question be like?

Does this question have such a character, does it activate creative reflection, does it motivate critical thinking? I hope it does.

Please give an example of a question you would ask for a built new much more perfect version of something similar to ChatGPT, for which each person could ask only one question.

Please answer,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Join, and show advocacy to the European Brain Council (EBC) which comprises nine member organizations, which are two of them are patient groups, and the other seven groups represent the research community, including the EAN and those working in mental health dedicated to overcoming socioeconomic burden on society from brain-related problems worldwide embarking from the EBC humanity efforts:

“We want to speak with one voice […] the individual funding organizations were all trying to do their advocacy, reaching out to the commission,” she said. “But it’s hard to meet politicians. If you have a common goal that all these organizations would support, it’s great to have one voice and one representative.”

“We want to translate that knowledge into new breakthroughs that can really help the patient,” she said. The Re-Thinking series, which is a follow-on from the value of treatment studies, offers to rethink diseases such as migraine, schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis. “Our target audiences are those involved in policies, to tell them where we’re at.” The Brain Innovation Days will take place on 26-27 October and are meant to be a platform where the community can interact with innovators. The EBC is also leading a global partnership in brain research, to move its activities outside of Europe and to a broader scale.

European advocacy in the brain space

If consciousness is simulated, such as simulating a neuron, will there be conscious artificial intelligence, certainly not like human consciousness, but conscious in another way?

Uncontrolled development of AI - artificial intelligence is a very dangerous thing!

👉 Dangerous to humanity, really, I say that as a person from the IT sector, as someone who spent the first half of his life (39 years) well, the last 25, spent in IT, passed all levels of formal education, passed university teaching positions... etc. .

To learn robots write and walk, and not our children, or gave them smartphones instead of time in nature? So sad ... and most people doesn't have time really?!

‼️ I think most people are not aware...

• One does not need to be overly intelligent to see what is happening, that we need to react and slow down or indeed put a moratorium on the uncontrolled (I will add insane) development of AI.

Of course, such development (if it is development at all?!) humanity does not need, except for those with a bad ultimate intention for all of us as a human species.

Imagine if, as a side effect of all this, it would be the "end of the world", and we would then call ourselves the most intelligent beings on Earth? We!? 😡

"Should we allow machines to flood our information channels with propaganda and untruths? Let chaos ensue.

Should we automate all jobs, including those that fill people's lives with meaning?

Should we develop non-human minds that could eventually outnumber, outsmart, outdate and replace us?

Should we risk losing control of our civilization?

👉 The letter has so far been signed by more than 27,500 people, including the author of several bestsellers such as Sapiens Yuval Noah Harari, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn and numerous artificial intelligence researchers such as Stuart Russell, Yoshua Bengio, Gary Marcus and Emad Mostaque." IndexHr

‼️ Personally, I would sign this letter and topics without thinking, because we are not even aware that at some point even that will be impossible.

👉 This is not a conspiracy theory, these are the facts today!

Also, take part in discusion and thank you. 🙏

💕 Let's think about the future in time, please. 🙏

More and more frequently, call centre employees calling us with various product and service offers turn out to be a specific form of usually already relatively simple, no longer latest-generation artificial intelligence technology on the basis of which bots are created to replace humans in the call centre departments of companies, enterprises and institutions. Increasingly, simulations, forecasts of future consumption of specific fixed utilities, electricity, water, gas, etc., and invoices for periods of future consumption of energy and other utilities are being produced by artificial intelligence as part of the predictive analyses carried out. Increasingly, tools of a certain generation of artificial intelligence are being used to create memes posted on social media websites. The development of artificial intelligence generates opportunities for its application in various spheres of activity of companies, enterprises and institutions; in various industries and services; improving the efficiency of business activities by increasing the scale of automation of processes; increasing the scale of business efficiency, increasing the capacity to process large sets of data and information; increasing the scale of implementation of new business models based on large-scale automation of manufacturing processes, etc. However, developing artificial intelligence in an uncontrolled manner generates serious risks, such as an increase in the scale of disinformation, the appearance of fake news, including banners, memes containing pictures, graphics, animations, films prepared by artificial intelligence, presenting 'fictitious facts', i.e. in a seemingly very realistic way, depicting events that never happened. There are risks of a potential increase in the scale of influence on public opinion, of the formation of a general social awareness by organisations operating without respect for the law. On the one hand, it is necessary to create digital computerised and standardised tools, diagnostic information systems, to build a standardised system of labels informing users, customers, citizens using certain solutions, products and services that they are the products of artificial intelligence and not of humans. On the other hand, regulations should be introduced obliging people to inform them that a particular service or product is the result of work done not by humans, but by artificial intelligence.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to the discussion of scientific issues and not the ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The scale of the development of disinformation on the Internet including, among other things, fakenews has been growing in recent years mainly in social media. Disinformation is mainly developing on social media sites that are popular among young people, children and teenagers. The growing scale of disinformation is particularly socially damaging in view of the key objective of its pursuit by cybercriminals and certain organisations using, for example, the technique of publishing posts and banners using fake profiles of fictitious Internet users containing fakenews. The aim is to try to influence public opinion in society, to shape the general social awareness of citizens, to influence the assessment of the activities of specific policies of the government, national and/or international organisations, public or other institutions, to influence the ratings, credibility, reputation, recognition of specific institutions, companies, enterprises, their product and service offerings, individuals, etc., to influence the results of parliamentary, presidential and other elections, etc. In addition to this, the scale of cybercriminal activity and the improvement of cyber security techniques have also been growing in parallel on the Internet in recent years. Therefore, as part of improving techniques to reduce the scale of disinformation spread deliberately by specific national and/or international organisations, computerised platforms are being built to detect fake news and other forms of disinformation on the internet built using Big Data Analytics, artificial intelligence and other Industry 4.0 technologies. Since cybercriminals and organisations generating disinformation use new Industry 4.0 technologies in the creation of fake profiles on popular social networks, new information technologies, Industry 4.0, including but not limited to Big Data Analytics, artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning, etc., should also be used to reduce the scale of such harmful activities to citizens.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what do you think about it?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The lockdowns and national quarantines introduced during the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) caused a strong decline in sales and turnover generated in traditionally, physically functioning shops and service establishments. The lockdowns imposed on selected service industries and on traditionally operated trade also resulted in an acceleration of e-commerce, the sale of products and services conducted via the Internet. When the coronavirus pandemic was no longer interpreted in terms of high health and economic risk, a significant proportion of traditionally operated trade and physical service establishments also returned to traditionally operated business, customer service, product or service sales. On the other hand, emerging new ICT and Industry 4.0 solutions are being implemented and support the economic activities of companies, enterprises, service establishments and shops producing and/or offering their products or services in both traditional and Internet-based formats. when the pandemic was considered to be over and did not generate major risks for the economic activities of service establishments and shops, new ICT and Industry 4. 0, including artificial intelligence technologies, are being implemented in information systems to support the sales processes of product or service offerings, including improving tools for activating potential consumers, getting customers interested in new product or service offerings, and encouraging customers to visit stationary shops and service establishments. In this regard, startups have been rapidly developing over the past few years, which, using anonymous mobile user identifiers and accurate location and internet user data available in various applications installed on smartphones, are able to precisely locate where a smartphone user is at any given time and diagnose whether he or she is by chance making a purchase in a specific stationary shop, walking down the street passing by an establishment providing specific services and perhaps considering using those services. In a situation where a technology start-up has data on a specific Internet user downloaded from a number of different Internet applications and, on the basis of this data collected on Big Data Analytics information processing and analysis platforms, has drawn up information-rich characteristics of the interests and purchasing preferences of a kind of digital avatar equivalent to a specific Internet user, then, in combination with analysis of current customer behaviour and GPS-based geolocalisation, it is able to make real-time predictions about the subsequent behaviour and/or purchasing decisions of individual potential customers of specific product or service offerings. Some technology start-ups conducting this kind of analytics based on large sets of customer data and on geolocalisation, use of specific apps and social media available on the smartphone and knowledge of the psychology of consumer behaviour are first able to precisely locate consumers in real time with reference to specific shops, service establishments, etc. They are able to firstly locate consumers in real time and precisely identify specific shops, service providers, etc., and then display information on advertising banners appearing in specific applications on the smartphone about the current offer, including a price or other promotion for a specific product available for sale in the shop where the Internet user and potential customer is currently located. Thanks to this type of technological solutions, more and more often an Internet user available on a smartphone in a situation when he/she is in the vicinity, next to specific stands, shop shelves, specific shops in shopping centres, and is thinking about buying a specific product, then at that moment he/she receives information on the smartphone, an advertisement appears with information on a price or other promotion concerning that particular product or a similar, highly substitutable product. At the aforementioned point in time when the customer is in a specific shop or part of a shop, online advertisements are displayed on his or her smartphone, e.g. on social media, the Google ecosystem, third-party web browsers or other applications that the potential customer has installed on his or her smartphone.

When such technological solutions are complemented by artificial intelligence analysing the consumer behaviour of individual customers of different product and service offers, it is possible to create intelligent analytical systems capable of predicting who will visit a specific shop, when they will do so and what they plan to buy in that shop. Statistically, a citizen has several applications installed in his or her smartphone, which provide the technology-based analytical companies with data about their current location. Therefore, thanks to the use of artificial intelligence, it may not be long before Internet users receive messages, see online advertisements displayed on their smartphones showing the products and services they are about to buy or think about tomorrow. Perhaps the artificial intelligence involved in this kind of analytics is already capable of predicting our consumer behaviour in real time and will soon be able to predict which shop we will go to and what we will buy tomorrow.

In view of the above, I would like to address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please answer,

I invite you all to discuss,

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

It used to be that people remembered the tel numbers of people they called frequently. Nowadays, tel no.'s are entered into smartphones and do not need to be remembered. Various online information services are available on smartphones and we are using them more and more. In many countries, taxi drivers are increasingly using GPS navigation and no longer have to pass an exam to know the topography and the names of all the streets in a city. Technology is increasingly relieving people of various tasks and the need to remember a lot of data. On the other hand, threats are emerging in the form of the generation of disinformation on online social media by posting pictures and videos showing 'fictitious facts' created by artificial intelligence. As deepfake is now recognised as one of the greatest threats arising from artificial intelligence applications, so it is urgently necessary to create legal regulations that regulate the proper use of artificial intelligence-based tools, including respect for copyright, when artificial intelligence creates new works, texts, graphics, etc. using various publications taken from Internet resources. How much the development of artificial intelligence and its applications will change labour markets in the future is suggested by the results of predictive and futurological analyses, according to which up to half of human jobs globally could disappear by 2050. On the other hand, surveys of a number of companies and enterprises show that over the next few years, the majority of businesses plan to carry out investment processes involving the implementation of new Industry 4.0 technologies, including artificial intelligence, into their operations. Predictive analyses and futurological visions created on their basis show that with the technological progress, along with the emergence of successive generations of artificial intelligence, more and more perfect artificial intelligence systems will be created in the next few years. In addition to this, a tool is already available on the Internet in the form of an intelligent language model based on generative artificial intelligence, which, by generating answers to questions, creates texts in an automated way, based on knowledge resources taken from a large number of Internet sites, Internet article databases, Internet book libraries, etc. On the other hand, a kind of ChatGPT creativity is not yet applied perfected, because within this creativity, "fictitious facts", i.e. nicely described events that never happened, may be described by ChatGPT in the created texts. Arguably, these imperfections in the next generations of this tool and in other ChatGPT-like intelligent, automated, digital chatbots created by subsequent technology companies will be corrected. When they are corrected, it will then become increasingly common for people to use such tools made available on the Internet by commissioning artificial intelligence to write specific texts, which will be created by the artificial intelligence in an increasingly creative manner and successively making fewer and fewer mistakes in this creative process. Consequently, humans will commission more and more complex tasks for the artificial intelligence to perform and increasingly require the use of creativity, innovation, artistry, etc. Thus, there may be another threat to humanity which may be the abandonment of performing creative activities when these activities can be performed by artificial intelligence. Thus, a new category of threat to humanity may emerge from the technological advances made by artificial intelligence. It may therefore happen in the future that the development of artificial intelligence is a threat to people's creative and critical thinking.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Hoping to hear your opinions, to get to know your personal opinion, to have an honest approach to discussing scientific issues and not ChatGPT-generated ready-made answers, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.

The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.

I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.

Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In recent years, more and more perfect robots equipped with artificial intelligence have been developed. New generations of artificial intelligence and/or machine learning technologies, when equipped with software that enables the creation of unique works, new creations, creative solutions, etc., can create a kind of artwork in the chosen field of creativity and artistry. If we connect a 3D printer to a robot equipped with an artificial intelligence system that is capable of designing and producing beautiful sculptures, can we thus obtain a kind of work of art?

When a robot equipped with an artificial intelligence system paints beautiful pictures, can the resulting works be considered fully artistic works of art?

If NO, why not?

And if YES, then who is the artist of the works of art created in this way, is it a robot equipped with artificial intelligence that creates them or a human being who created this artificial intelligence and programmed it accordingly?

What is your opinion on this topic?

What do you think about this topic?

Please reply,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

On the one hand, artificial intelligence technology is developing rapidly due to emerging new applications and dynamic technological advances. The very conception, definition and development of artificial intelligence on the basis of the third technological revolution already started several decades emu. However, the significant acceleration of the development of various solutions and applications of artificial intelligence in the context of the current fourth technological revolution has occurred over the last few years. In contrast, a significant increase in public interest in this issue has occurred in the last few months, i.e. since November 2022, when the company OpenAI made available in open access to Internet users an artificial intelligence built in the formulation of a generative language model as ChatGPT, i.e. an automated chat that learns and improves itself based on the answers given to Internet users who ask questions in relation to this system. Many citizens, through a kind of conversation with ChatGPT, i.e. a conversation with an artificial intelligence, began to experience something that could be compared to what they saw many years ago in, for example, Stanley Kubrick's 1968 Oscar-winning science fiction film '2001: A Space Odyssey'. The film's plot was inspired by the novel by Arthur C. Clarke.

However, this development also generates potential risks and dangers of inappropriate application of as much advanced artificial intelligence technology. An example is the already developing disinformation in the new online media, including mainly social media, generated by the creation and posting in these media of texts, photos, films created by artificial intelligence, which look as if they were created by a human being and present a kind of "fictitious facts", i.e. very credibly and precisely depict, describe events that in reality never happened. And what if, as part of the technological advances taking place, artificial intelligence is taught the thought processes typical of humans? What if something that could be described as artificial consciousness is created? What if, as part of the aforementioned thought processes carried out by artificial intelligence enriched with artificial consciousness, autonomous, thinking robots are created that acquire characteristics hitherto considered typical only of humans? What if these are also features of the human psyche, and which artificial intelligence could use as a tool for self-improvement, to escape human control? Would then a scenario like the one we know from the Terminator series of films, in which the main character is an autonomous, intelligent robot played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, be possible? Is it possible that highly intelligent machines, which humans will teach to think and equip with what will be described as artificial consciousness, will completely spin out of control and turn against their creator, i.e. humans? for the moment, these are questions that inspire paraphilosophical considerations. But it cannot be ruled out that soon these questions could be more substantively justified.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In the context of the development and successive but also relatively fast emerging new applications of artificial intelligence technology, reflections on the essence of creativity, which until recently was considered an exclusively human trait, are emerging. However, rapidly emerging new applications of increasingly refined artificial intelligence, which can be taught to process increasingly creative and much more efficient multi-criteria processing of ever larger data sets, is becoming the basis for consideration of creative task solving by specific artificial intelligence solutions, including generative language models, i.e. ChatGPT 4.0. Among the many different fields in which humans develop their capacity for creativity is the arts. Within the framework of artistic activity, humans have been developing several key artistic fields such as painting, sculpture, architecture, literature, theatre, music and singing since ancient times. On the other hand, modern artistic fields such as photography and film are also developing, thanks to the technological revolutions that have taken place over the past two centuries. In recent years, a large proportion of the artworks collected in art galleries, libraries etc. have been digitised and have their digital counterparts, which are made available on the Internet. During the Coronavirus pandemic of 2020, the processes of digitisation of various types of artistic works and other products of human activity and creativity accelerated significantly. New ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0 have become of great help in the processes of digital processing, analysis and use of increasingly large amounts of data, including artistic works. Artificial intelligence technologies currently under development, after the application of specific learning processes, i.e. the application of machine learning and/or deep learning technologies, are capable of combining different types of data, including on different types of digitised media and digitised artistic works, to create something new, which can be considered a kind of new form of creativity. Sometimes, the effects of this kind of creativity realised by artificial intelligence are such a new field of application of this technology that the relevant legal regulations, including but not limited to copyright, have not yet been established. Well, if with the help of artificial intelligence it is possible to create pictures of an event that did not happen, i.e. as if one were to photograph a media-famous person in a situation and place where he or she has never really been, one can create a film with a cast of people who are no longer alive or who did not really exist at all, etc., then where does the creativity of those using artificial intelligence end? where does the creativity of people using artificial intelligence as a tool to achieve a specific goal end and where does the creativity of this technology begin, which, understanding the commands of humans, more and more precisely creates a kind of innovative solutions, more and more efficiently performs specific tasks and more and more creatively creates a kind of artistic works that are difficult to distinguish from their analytical works created traditionally, i.e. without the use of advanced information technology by humans. One particularly interesting thing that has already happened is the creation, with the help of artificial intelligence, of a new musical work of a song, in which the voice of a certain real existing singer is used, combined with new music and new song lyrics, and in this way a recording of a song sung by a singer who in reality never wrote the music and never sang the song is created. And if a song created in this way finds its way to the top of the charts, how will the question of honouring copyright be resolved, who is and to what extent the creator of such a work, to whom should the key part of the creativity in such a creation of a musical work be attributed? But of course, this is only an example, as similar, as yet unregulated complex processes for the creation of artistic works with the involvement of artificial intelligence in this process can and probably will be applied in other fields of art as well. In addition, the question of the creativity of artificial intelligence in the context of human creativity, in which also thought processes, consciousness, emotions, etc. are involved, also remains to be resolved.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about it?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I have a proposal to the ResearchGate team to include in all author profiles as a new feature the link on ChatGPT to provide answers to questions.

In this case we will haven't any questions without answers.

For several years, scientists have been refining artificial intelligence technology to think the way humans think. The coronavirus pandemic accelerated the digitalisation of remote, online communication, economic and other processes. During this period, online technology companies accelerated their growth and many companies in the sectors of manufacturing, commerce, services, tourism, catering, culture, etc. significantly increased the processes of internetisation of their business, communication with customers, supply logistics and procurement processes. During this period, many companies and enterprises have increased their investments in new ICT technologies and Industry 4.0 in order to streamline their business processes, improve business management processes, etc. The improvement of artificial intelligence technologies also accelerated during this period, including, for example, the development of ChatGPT technology. New applications of machine learning, deep learning and artificial intelligence technologies in various industries and sectors are developing rapidly. For several years, research and development work on improving artificial intelligence technology has entered a new phase involving, among other things, attempts to teach artificial intelligence to think in a model like that of the human brain. According to this plan, artificial intelligence is supposed to be able to imagine things that it has not previously known or seen, etc.

In the context of this kind of research and development work, it is fundamental to fully understand the processes that take place in the human brain within what we call thinking. A particular characteristic of human thinking processes is the ability to separate conscious thinking, awareness of one's own existence, abstract thinking, the formulation of questions within the framework of critical thinking from the selective, multi-criteria processing of knowledge and information. In addition, research is underway to create autonomous human-like robots, androids equipped not only with artificial intelligence, but also with what can be called artificial consciousness, i.e. a digitally created human-like consciousness. Still not fully resolved is the question of whether a digitally constructed artificial consciousness, which is a kind of supplement to a high generation of artificial intelligence, would really consist of a humanoid cyborg, a human-like android built to resemble a human, being aware of its own existence or merely behaving as if it were thinking, as if it were equipped with its own consciousness. Highly humanoid, autonomous androids are already being built that have 'human faces' equipped with the ability to express 'emotions' through a set of actuators installed in the robot's 'face' that imitate human facial expressions, human grimaces, representing various emotional states. Androids equipped with such humanoid facial expressions combined with the robot's ability to participate in discussions on various current issues and problems could be perceived by the humans discussing them as not only highly intelligent but also as aware of what they are saying and perhaps aware of their existence. But we still don't know that even in such a situation it could be 'just' a simulation of human emotions, human consciousness, human thinking, etc. by a machine equipped with highly advanced artificial intelligence. And when, in addition, an autonomous android equipped with an advanced generation of artificial intelligence is connected through Internet of Things technology, cloud computing to knowledge resources available on the Internet in a real-time formula, and is equipped with the ability to multi-criteria, multi-faceted processing of large sets of current information performed on Big Data Analytics platforms, then almost limitless possibilities for applications of such highly intelligent robots open up.

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Should the development of artificial intelligence be subject to control? And if so, who should exercise this control? How should an institutional system for controlling the development of artificial intelligence applications be built?

Why are the creators of leading technology companies developing ICT, Internet technologies, Industry 4.0, including those developing artificial intelligence technologies, etc. now calling for the development of this technology to be periodically, deliberately slowed down, so that the development of artificial intelligence technology is fully under control and does not get out of hand?

To this, should the development of artificial intelligence be under control? - the answer is probably obvious, i.e. that it should. What remains debatable, however, is how the system of institutional control of the development of advanced artificial intelligence models and algorithms should be structured so that this development does not get out of control and lead to negative consequences that are currently difficult to foresee. Besides, if the question: should the development of artificial intelligence be controlled? - is answered in the affirmative, i.e. YES, then who should exercise this control? So, how should an institutional system of control over the development of advanced artificial intelligence models and algorithms and their applications be constructed, so that the potential and real future negative effects of dynamic and not fully controlled technological progress do not outweigh the positive ones. Well, at the end of March this year 2023, a number of new technology developers, artificial intelligence experts, besides businessmen, investors developing technology start-ups, including, among others, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and the founder or co-founder of such technology companies as PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink and the Boring Company, i.e. Elon Musk, Stability AI chief Emad Mostaque (maker of the Stable Diffusion image generator) and artificial intelligence researchers from Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and other AI universities and labs have called in a joint letter for at least a six-month pause in the development of artificial intelligence systems more capable than the GPT-4 published in March. The aforementioned letter acting as a kind of cautionary petition was published on the Future of Life Institute centre's website, advanced artificial intelligence could represent "a profound change in the history of life on Earth" and the development of this technology should be approached with caution. In this petition of sorts, there are warnings about the unpredictable consequences of the race to create ever more powerful models and complex algorithms that are key components of artificial intelligence technology. The aforementioned developers of leading technology companies suggest that the development of artificial intelligence should be slowed down temporarily, as the risk has now emerged that this development could slip out of human control. The aforementioned petition warns that an uncontrolled approach to AI development risks a deluge of disinformation, mass automation of work and even the replacement of humans by machines and a 'loss of control over civilisation'. In addition, the letter suggests that if the current rapid development of artificial intelligence algorithm systems gets out of hand, then the scale of disinformation on the Internet will increase significantly, the process of work automation already taking place will accelerate many times, which may lead to the loss of jobs for about 300 million people within the current decade and, as a consequence, may also lead to a kind of loss of human control over the development of civilisation. Developers of new technologies point out that advanced artificial intelligence algorithm systems should only be developed when the development of artificial intelligence is under full control, the effects of this development are positive and the potential risks are fully controllable. Developers of new technologies are calling for a temporary pause in the training of systems superior to OpenAI's recently released GPT-4 system, which, among other things, is capable of passing tests of various kinds at a level close to the best results passed by humans. The aforementioned letter also calls for the implementation of comprehensive government regulation and oversight of new models of advanced AI algorithms, so that the development of this technology does not overtake the creation of the necessary legal regulations.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think?

What is your opinion on the subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Some commercial and investment banks are already creating their cryptocurrencies. Some investment funds are also allocating part of their funds for the purchase of certain investment financial instruments and other investment assets as part of building their investment prortfolio to the purchase of selected cryptocurrencies. It may therefore be that in the future, financial or para-financial institutions will be established that will accept selected cryptocurrencies for deposits and, on the other hand, will also lend cryptocurrencies. Related to this issue will be an increase in the level of institutionalisation of cryptocurrency trading platform markets. As part of a potential increase in the level of formalisation of procedures and institutionalisation of markets in which citizens and businesses use cryptocurrencies, supervisory institutions should also be created, thanks to which the level of security of the use of cryptocurrencies should increase and also the level of investment risk of investing in cryptocurrencies should decrease significantly. Thus, with a higher level of security in the use of cryptocurrencies, more citizens will be willing to use cryptocurrencies both as payment instruments and as alternative investment instruments. With certain financial institutions or para-financial firms lending cryptocurrencies in a formula similar to bank lending transactions, the importance of the credit risk management process of cryptocurrency lending will increase. Since new information technologies and Industry 4.0, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning and analytics conducted on computerised Big Data Analytics platforms, are already being used in the credit risk management process occurring in the context of banks' lending and investment transactions in securities and other capital markets assets, so in the future such new technologies may also be applied to improve the credit risk management processes of cryptocurrency lending.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The ChatGPT artificial intelligence technology generates answers to questions based on an outdated set of data and information downloaded from selected websites in 2021. In addition, the learning algorithms contained in ChatGPT technology are not perfect, which means that the answers to questions generated by this form of artificial intelligence may contain factual errors and a kind of fictitious 'facts'. A serious drawback of using this type of tool is that the ChatGPT-generated answers may contain serious factual errors. When people ask about something specific, they may receive an answer that is not factually correct. ChatGPT often answers questions eloquently, but often its answers may not relate to existing facts. ChatGPT can generate a kind of fictitious 'facts', i.e. the generated answers may contain stylistically, phraseologically, etc. correctly formulated sentences containing descriptions and characteristics of certain objects presented as real existing but not actually existing. In the future, a ChatGPT-type system will be refined and improved, which will be self-learning and self-improving in the analysis of large data sets and will take into account newly emerging data and information to generate answers to the questions asked without making numerous mistakes as is currently the case.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this subject?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

If the ChatGPT, with the passage of time and the receipt of successive questions using machine learning and/or deep learning technology, were to continuously and successively improve its answers, i.e. the texts generated as an answer to the questions asked, including the same questions asked, then the answers obtained should, with time, become more and more perfect in terms of content and the scale of errors, non-existent "facts", new but not factually correct "information" created by the ChatGPT in the automatically generated texts should gradually decrease. But has the current, next generation of ChatGPT 4.0 already applied sufficiently advanced, automatic learning to this tool to create ever more perfect texts in which the number of errors should decrease? This is a key question that will largely determine the possibilities for practical applications of this artificial intelligence technology in various fields, human professions, industries and economic sectors. On the other hand, the possibilities of the aforementioned learning process to create better and better answers to the questions asked will become increasingly limited over time if the knowledge base of 2021 used by ChatGPT is not updated and enriched with new data, information, publications, etc. over an extended period of time. In the future, it is likely that such processes of updating and expanding the source database will be carried out. The issue of carrying out such updates and extensions to the source knowledge base will be determined by the technological advances taking place and the increasing pressure on the business use of such technologies.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Year after year, microprocessors will be developed to process ever faster and ever larger data sets. More and more perfect artificial intelligence solutions will also be built, and successive generations of artificial intelligence will be created, e.g. much more perfect than what is currently offered, for example, by the technology on which ChatGPT was developed, which is offered on the Internet in open access. However, the ever-increasing computational capabilities of ICT information technology and the ever-larger, multi-terabyte datasets that can be efficiently processed do not yet ensure the success of a specific, highly intelligent outcome. An important issue is the use of increasingly sophisticated, multi-criteria, complex analytical models, including models composed of multiple algorithms and equipped with the capacity for self-learning and self-improvement using large amounts of data and information retrieved from, for example, the Internet. But it cannot be ruled out that perhaps in the future, a constantly improved artificial intelligence equipped with new Big Data Analytics solutions and full access to data on the Internet may prove to be more intelligent, but it will not be smarter than humans even if it is equipped with a kind of artificial awareness in the future. Perhaps citizens will receive on their smartphones in the future a kind of much more enhanced personal advisors than those currently in use, who will provide highly professional answers to the various questions asked by smartphone users on the basis of data available on the Internet and processed in real time on the Big Data Analytics platform and on the basis of the new generations of machine learning, deep learning and artificial intelligence technology used in these automated advisory solutions. And beyond that, whether such solutions can significantly deepen the issue of new cybercrime techniques and new cyber security systems.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Does the application of specific artificial intelligence technologies for the automation of risk analysis processes, the execution of credit scoring processes for potential individual credit transactions, the ongoing monitoring of open credit transactions and the analysis of changes in the level of credit risk significantly allow the improvement of credit risk management processes and the optimisation of credit processes in the context of improving the profitability of commercial banks' lending activities?

Commercial banks operating according to the classic deposit and credit banking model generate revenues and profits mainly from lending activities. On the one hand, the formation of the quality of the bank loan portfolio and the level of financial results are determined by external factors, i.e. the economic situation in the economy, the economic environment of the bank's customers, borrowers taking bank loans and depositors placing their financial surpluses on bank deposits. On the other hand, the efficiency of the lending business and the development of financial results are also influenced by internal factors, which primarily include the efficiency of the credit risk management process. The credit risk management process is carried out on a stand-alone basis in terms of examining the creditworthiness of the potential or current borrower (ongoing monitoring of the loan granted) and the credit risk the bank accepts in the situation of granting a loan. The credit risk management process is also carried out in banks on a portfolio basis with regard to the entire portfolio of loans granted and by type of loan. Both in terms of the individual and portfolio risk management process, banks are seeking to improve and optimise these processes through the involvement of new information technologies and Industry 4.0. Thanks to these new technologies, banks have the possibility to transfer part of their risk management processes to the bank's internal IT systems and to offer loans also and increasingly via the Internet. Loans of relatively low amounts, consumer loans, instalment loans, i.e. mainly granted to the public, and working capital loans to businesses can already be entirely remote communication with the customer via the Internet. In the case of home and business loans, including investment loans, banks require the borrower to provide various business-related documents to carry out a creditworthiness analysis and examine a number of different economic, financial, operational, investment risk factors, etc., which can be used as a basis for the creditworthiness analysis. As a result, the process of granting these types of business, investment and housing loans, which are usually also for relatively higher amounts, is not yet fully feasible via the Internet when the process of granting these loans itself is not expected to generate high operational risks for banks. However, ongoing technological advances may also change this significantly in the future. At present, banks are trying to implement new Industry 4.0 technologies into their lending activities in order to improve and optimise their costs. The use of new Industry 4.0 technologies in banks is also determined by the need to improve computerised cyber-security systems with a view to constantly improving cyber-security. Recently, key Industry 4.0 technologies that banks are implementing into their operations include artificial intelligence, machine learning technology, deep learning, Big Data Analytics, cloud computing, Internet of Things, Blockchain, multi-criteria simulation models, digital twins, etc. Particularly new opportunities arise in terms of improving both remote marketing communication techniques, optimising banking procedures, reducing the scale of the bank's operational risks and also improving credit procedures and the credit risk management process by involving artificial intelligence in the bank's operations.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

In large corporations characterized by a complex, multi-level organizational structure, the flow of information can be difficult. New ICT and Industry 4.0 information technologies are proving to be helpful in this regard, improving the efficiency of the flow of information flowing between departments and divisions in the corporation. One of the Industry 4.0 technologies that has recently found various new applications is artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence technology is finding many new applications in recent years. The implementation of artificial intelligence, machine learning and other Industry 4.0 technologies into various business fields of companies, enterprises and financial institutions is associated with the increase in digitization and automation of processes carried out in business entities. For several decades, in order to refine and improve the flow of information in a corporation characterized by a complex organizational structure, integrated information systems are being implemented that informationally connect applications and programs operating within specific departments, divisions, plants, etc. in a large enterprise, company, corporation. Nowadays, a technology that can help optimize remote communication and information flow in a corporation is artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence can help optimize information flow and data transfer within a corporation's intranet.

Besides, the technologies of Industry 4.0, including artificial intelligence, can help improve the cyber security techniques of data transfer, including that carried out in email communications.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of researchers and scientists:

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

This kind of vision involving the transfer of the consciousness and knowledge of a specific human being to a computer system equipped with a suitably highly advanced artificial intelligence was depicted in a science fiction film titled "Transcendence" (starring Jonny Deep) It has been reported that research work is underway at one of Elon Musk's technology companies to create an intelligent computerized system that can communicate with the human brain in a way that is far more technologically advanced than current standards. The goal is to create an intelligent computerized system, equipped with a new generation of artificial intelligence technology so that it will be possible to transfer a copy of human knowledge and consciousness contained in the brain of a specific person according to a concept similar to that depicted in a science fiction film titled "Transcendence." In considering the possible future feasibility of such concepts concerning the transfer of human consciousness and knowledge to an information system equipped with advanced artificial intelligence, the paraphilosophical question of extending the life of a human being whose consciousness functions in a suitably advanced intelligent information system is taken into account, while the human being from whom this consciousness originated previously died. And even if this were possible in the future, how should this issue be defined in terms of the ethics of science, the essence of humanity, etc.? On the other hand, research and research-implementation work is already underway in many technology companies' laboratories to create a system of non-verbal communication, where certain messages are transmitted from a human to a computer without the use of a keyboard, etc., only through systems that read people's minds, for example. through systems that recognize specific messages formulated non-verbally in the form of thoughts only and a computer system equipped with electrical impulse and brain wave sensors specially created for this purpose would read human thoughts and transmit the information thus read, i.e., messages to the artificial intelligence system. This kind of solution will probably soon be available, as it does not require as advanced artificial intelligence technology as would be required for a suitably intelligent information system into which the consciousness and knowledge of a specific human person could be uploaded. Ethical considerations arise for the realization of this kind of transfer and perhaps through it the creation of artificial consciousness.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of researchers and scientists:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What do you think on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

(Matlab, R, Python, ...??)

taking into account the current evolution of artificial intelligence

Please I want to clarify something. I trained a machine learning algorithm with a data set and tested it and I received as a good result but if possible write an algorithm just for the test to test the new data to avoid learning phase? Thanks.

The new trend of transportation Engineering Activities enrolled different technologies. These technologies include: Computer Vision, GIS, Neural Network, Artificial Intelligence; Digital Photogrmmetry, Unmanned drones, Expert and Knowledge-based systems, Digital Mapping, cellular phone usage, 3D-mapping; etc.

What do you thing the second era for the new millennium will be?

Please consider and discuss any or all of the following questions:

1. Can AI be used in Decentralized Autonomous Systems (DAO)? How?

BEST ANSWERS

Arez Wazwaz

- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9036152

- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353515227_no1s1_-_a_blockchain-based_DAO_prototype_for_autonomous_space

2. Would the AI be a platform, a DAO member, manager of the DAO or have some other role?

BEST ANSWERS

Arez Wazwaz

- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353515227_no1s1_-_a_blockchain-based_DAO_prototype_for_autonomous_space

3. What are the advantages and risks of using AI in a DAO?

NOTE: Please share any sources you may be aware of. Thanks for any contribution.

Can anyone provide me with PSO MATLAB code to optimize the weights of multi types of Neural Networks?

Like other meta-heuristic algorithms, some algorithms tend to be trapped in low diversity, local optima and unbalanced exploitation ability.

Naseer Bhat asked "What is consciousness? What is its nature and origin?" We do not know. We can speculate about nature and origin but for what should this be good? I think there is a necessitiy in data processing which forced the evolutionary process to create this phenomenon. I am sure anticipation, association and social interaction are part in this process. May be the analyssis of wet brains will bring some light in this question, but we should follow this question step by step in bottom up manner asking what an organism needs to process the environmental and inner data. To decide if there is consciousness we need a significant prove method. This would be a much harder problem then creating a consciousness automata.

Hello everyone,

Could you recommend papers, books or websites about mathematical foundations of artificial intelligence?

Thank you for your attention and valuable support.

Regards,

Cecilia-Irene Loeza-Mejía

If artificial intelligence that mapped human neurons was built, then it would be a very advanced artificial intelligence. If artificial intelligence was built in such a way that all human neurons would be reconstructed in digital technology, it would mean the possibility of building cybernetic structures capable of collecting and processing data in a much larger database capacity than at present. However, if it would only be the reproduction of simple neural structures and their reproduction to the number of neurons contained in the human organism, then only or mainly quantitative and not necessarily qualitative factors that characterize the collection and processing of data in the human brain would be achieved. Without achieving all of the qualitative variables typical of the human nervous system in a cybernetic counterpart, it might be doubtful to create in this cybernetic structure an artificial nervous system of cybernetic consciousness which is the equivalent of human consciousness.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Will artificial neural structures become such advanced artificial intelligence that artificial consciousness will arise? Theoretically, such projects can be considered, but to really verify this, artificial neural structures should be created. From research on the human brain, it appears that this is a very complex and yet not fully understood neural structure. The brain has various centers, areas that manage the functioning of specific organs and processes of the human body. In addition, Sylvia is also complex and consists of elements of emotional, abstract, creative, etc. intelligence that also function in separate sectors of the human brain.

In view of the above, does research on the human brain and progress in the construction of ever more complex structures of artificial intelligence lead to synergy in the development of these fields of science? Will the development of these fields of science lead to the integration of research into the analysis of human brain activity and the construction of more and more complex structures of artificial intelligence equipped with elements of emotional, creative intelligence, etc.?

Besides, does the improvement of artificial intelligence lead to the emergence of artificial emotional intelligence and, consequently, to autonomous robots that will be sensitive to specific changes in environmental factors, factors of the surrounding environment? Will specific changes in the surrounding environment trigger programmed reactions of advanced artificial emotional intelligence, ie activation of pre-programmed algorithms of implemented activities and learning processes as part of improving the learning processes of machines.

Therefore, another important question arises in this area:

Is it possible to create an artificial consciousness that will function with the structure of an artificial electronic neural network built in such a way as to reflect the structure of the human brain? In this way, the structure of advanced artificial intelligence will be able to improve on the basis of acquired knowledge eg from external internet databases?

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

What kind of scientific research dominate in the field of Artificial intelligence?

Please, provide your suggestions for a question, problem or research thesis in the issues: Artificial intelligence.

Please reply.

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

Please discuss/ suggest best workable strategies to get desired results with VQGAN+CLIP for improving upon the generative outcomes.

U-net Neural Networks are similar to GAN and consist of a contracting path and an expansive path.

In this regard can we consider that U-Net a part of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) Architecture? Can be GANs use for Segmentation pictures similar to U-Net?

I think that Generative Adversarial Networks can be used as Data Farming Means. What do you know about such an approach? Can you give another example of means for Data Farming?

As I have observed, if we increase window size then it increases accuracy which in turn slowdowns the training. Contrarily, if we decrease input window size then accuracy decreases, and the network gets trained faster. Need suggestions for obtaining the best results from LSTM network with optimal window size.