Science topic
Neolithic Archaeology - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Neolithic Archaeology, and find Neolithic Archaeology experts.
Questions related to Neolithic Archaeology
Apart from outdated sources, all of the scholarly literature I have been able to come across asserts that agriculture was discovered in China independently. Are there any studies which suggest that agriculture arrived in China from another region such as India?
For hundreds of thousands of years human society was confined to the life style of the subsistence hunter gatherer. Small bands of people, based largely around family groups spent countless generations living in this manner.
After the last Ice Age, at the beginning of the current interglacial that we are living in today humans developed agriculture and animal husbandry within a very short time and began living in fixed or semi-fixed settlements. Some of these found in archaeological sites are around 11,000 years old such as those at Göbekli Tepe & Çatalhöyük show a sophisticated type of architecture and artwork we would feel comfortable in today.
What pressures and influences initiated this drastic change in individual and group behaviour and why had it not happened before?
I raise this as a point of discussion.
Two days ago I heard a news story about newly found ca. 6,000 year old hillfort at Khirbet Abu al-Husayn in the Jordan desert. The remarkable stonework at Goblekli Tepe are 9,000 years old. While in Malta there are sophisticated ruins dating back to 4,000 BC. The old tradition of civilisation arising in Mesopotamia and Egypt is looking fragile.
Is anyone working on consolidating this new archaeological evidence to redraw the time line of human history?
And what other recent archaeological finds should be added to this picture?
X-Ray Diffraction analyses made on Neolithic beads from Sudan have identified them as Natrolite, a silicates aluminum and variety of Zeolite. Does anyone know any analogy please? And where are the sources of this material in Africa? Many thanks!
Does anybody know support-pots with a rectangular shape such as those from the attached picture dated in Neolithic or other prehistoric periods?
In Romania, they are specific to Boian culture, final phases (ca. 5000-4500 BC).
Thanks in advance.
I am interested in relevant archaeological evidences from any areas and periods.
Do you believe in portable XRF dating of desert varnish?
Do you think that associated dates for single component sites spatially associated with the rock art are reasonable?
What techniques have you used?
How have you attempted to obtain chronological controls?
Does anybody know Lithoglyphus pygmaeus specimens (or ornaments manufactured from this gastropod) discovered in prehistoric sites?
I need some literature about Linear Pottery ceramics and its impact on the neolithisation of Central and Western Europe?
The Thera eruption destroyed most of the island today known as Santorini.
Akrotiri, located on the eastern tip of the island, was destroyed as the archaeological excavations show at present..
Nevertheless, no human remains have been found wit the exception of a few skeletons.
The primary question is: What happened to the Akrotiri population of which no remains have been found?
I would be very grateful if anybody was interested in my research about the clay balls - rounded handy sized clay objects. I am trying to distinguish among them, sort them according to the dimensions, weight and shape. I will compare them with the artefacts assigned as sling balls from the sites where they are attested. If anybody has a good database (e.g.. xls data sheets) of clay balls from Halafian sites and wants to share it, please contact me.
I need this for my master thesis.
Greetings,
Donald E. Brown's book, "Human Universals", explores and describes physical and behavioral characteristics that can be considered universal among all cultures, all people. I have not been able to get my hands on a copy of that work. Can someone who has read the book tell me if Brown employed a systematic cross-cultural analysis? Or did he employed a different methodology? If so, what was the procedure he used to determine which traits are ubiquitous in human societies? Are his findings robust and reliable? Or are they based on a somewhat haphazard survey of regionally isolated studies?
I have discovered these objects from a 3rd millennium BC site.
Iron Age, Scotland, Subterranean, Cave, ritual, not including Souterrrains. Thank you. A site name would help, an excavator name would help more, links to papers or details of publication would be best.
I'm looking for evidence for bone projectile points in Neolithic pre-pottery and pottery of the Near East. Can anybody point out relevant literature?
Has anyone tried converting data obtained with a Bruker Tracer III-V+ pXRF to be comparable to data obtained with the new Tracer III-SD? I'm working on obsidian and I have tried both compressing and expanding the spectrum but the numbers do not even come close to being comparable.
This zoomorphic figurine - a lion - alabaster made, is a fortuitous find on a chalcolithic tell settlement (Gumelnita, ca. 4000 BC) in Teleorman county, southern Romania. This is a quite unusual representation for this period.
In the summer of 2014, we discovered a new Eneolithic cemetery at Sultana (Romania), and near one of the skeletons we identified a fragment of red ocher bead.
Does anybody know other similar artefacts from prehistory or other time periods?
Thanks in advance.
I am looking for a relevant archaeological synthesis on the Neolithic periods of Corsica, South France, Italy and Sicily, possibly with data on lithic material consumption.
a) My interest in Neolithic face (NF) began by serendipitous observations along 1000 miles long Sepik River of Papua New Guinea in 1971. I noted a consistent basic difference between the face depictions in the art the frequently visited and missionized (literate) Middle Sepik region as against the exclusive NF representation in drawings as well as in the ritual sacred art of the pre-literate Upper Sepik River region (that had only been opened since the late 1960’s Even then it was rarely visited, since the Swiss expert Alfred Buehler had written:“there is virtually nothing in the way of art in the Upper Sepik region”.
However, by chance , shortly after the completion of a ritual, I came across Upper Sepik sacred ritual woodcarvings and clay figures.which were all destroyed after one use, since they had lost their “mana”. Such ritual objects presented “neolithic faces” and were very rarely revealed to strangers not even to the expert Dr. Douglas Newton . (He graciously acknowledged the authenticity of my collection in writing and told me that he had spent 3 x 6 months each looking in vain specifically for such art for the then Rockefeller Museum of Primitive Art in New York City).
b) After having tested many face drawing with the DAPF, I identified certain “ visual or spatial” dyslexics (from a Heidelberg School, where 3rd grade students had not yet been taught how to draw a face (in contrast to schools in USA, where Sesami Street had also already been on TV) .
c) The face drawing test, was later supplemented by culture-fair modifications of the Kohs Block Design test and administered to pre-literate “stone-age” Amazonian Auca Indians (Brain & Cognition l989;10:54-75) and to various hunter-gatherers on 3 continents, eg. Experientia (was available in the HMS Reference Room) 1976;32:1431-1435 – same, 1980;36:83-86 – same, 1982;38:579-587..
Note: Many drawings of the human body by various tribes people, photo copies of the 30 Upper Sepik River ritual objects (Figs 1 & 2, JAMWA 1974;29:434-444) reprints on NF and travel diary are available on HOLLIS : http://www.radcliffe.edu/schlesinger_library.aspx (Click on HOLLIS Classic and search on Pontius, Anneliese Alma.). ”
d 1) Using NF and control masks, I tested newborns’ reflex-like wide-open mouth “smiling response” (disappearing after c. 4 months of life) . The newborns “smiled” significantly faster ( p< 0.001) to “neolithic face“ patterns than to 4 control masks, including my natural face (Experientia 1975;31:126-128).
. d2) As an example of the very short time widow of the “smiling response” (probably fostering bonding between newborn and care giver) consider my accidental observations of one- year- olds, who happened to enter the test situation while NF masks were worn .These infants screamed with fright and clang to their nurses’ legs.
Such fright reaction to “NF” by persons older than 4 months has also been reported to me by the Upper Sepik art expert Dr. Douglas Newton, who graciously explained to me that my 5 small clay-faces with NF (JAMWA 1974 29: 435-44, Fig’s 1 & 2) were used to frighten children into weaning. Further, shields with NF, he said, were used during fights to frighten the enemies.
(Not by accident, it seems, do certain modern artists, and particularly advertisers etc show NF’ patterns to catch attention).
Supporting the innateness of the neuro-developmentally early pattern of NF are the following findings (as listed in the Encyclopedia of Human Biology 1997:Vol. 3:513-527).
a) NF is reacted to preferentially during the brief-lasting period of the reflex-like wide-open-mouth “smiling response” existing only up to 4 months of age (Pontius., Experientia 1975;31:126-128 (above).
b NF resurfaces regressively in the pathological dysfunction of the posterior neocortex in prosop-agnosia, where specifically the familiar face is no longer recognized, since it appears to the patient as “flattened out”, “without any relief” (J.Bodamer ,Arch .Psychiatrie & Nervenkrankheiten 1947:179:6-54) . Such a dysfunction erases precisely the subtle visuo-spatial processing of the root of the nose area (as tested by the DAPF).
Such rare patients’ few published face drawings also show mostly NF.
c) NF also re-appears regressively in the drawings of US-educated “skid row” alcoholics (Pontius, Ann. New York Academy Sci’s, 1985;444:475-477.)
d) Strikingly, the NF resurfaces as an apparently unchanging global schema, persisting even in a patient suffering from “unilateral neglect” of one side of the visual field due to a unilateral parieto-occipital tumor, as unwittingly depicted by A.R. Luria (“Higher Cortical Functions in Man”, Basic Books, 1980, Fig. 41). This patient “copied” from samples only one half of all non-human objects. However he “copied” even from normal face samples both(!) sides of NF.
Consistency between Hypothesizing on “amygdalar shortcut” processing (Pontius 1998) and that proposed by neuroscientists (2003)
Intriguingly and independently recent research by neuroscientists using fMRI & ERPS (Science 2003;300:568-569, Fig. 1) has engendered the same hypothesis of a second , i.e. amygdalar visual pathway with faster (by c. 250 msec) but cruder processing, by-passing refined neocortical processing., exemplified by their “blurred face” in Fig. 1.
Their “blurred face” is consistent with NF: both omit any indication of the suble visuo-spatial relations of the root of the nose area
Correspondingly, I too had hypothesized in regard to NF the existence of “amygdalar shortcut” processing, by-passing refined neocortical processing, to explain the crude NF (HMS Research Day Poster Session 1989).
That such a coarse processing is also faster and might be life-saving was supported by significant results of the two tests (above) with pre-literate tribes peoples living in constant fear for life due to warring neighbors in remote areas on 3 continents. By contrast, non-NF face drawings were produced by peaceful and largely literate controls living nearby (Aggression & Violent Behavior (Elsevier) 2005:10:363-373.
Thus, future use of NF patterns may prove valid and meaningful within its naturalistic context in certain sophisticated research designs related to the human face pattern.
