Names - Science topic

Abdulfatai B. Rufai

Image 1 & 2: It is Tacca leontopetaloides (L.) Kuntze of Dioscoreaceae family.

Image 3: It seems to be Cochlospermum planchonii Hook.f. ex Planch. of Bixaceae family.

Thanks!

Identifying the name of a co-citation cluster in VOS Viewer involves several steps. Here’s a general guide on how to do it:

Data Import:

Import your bibliographic data or co-citation matrix into VOS Viewer. Ensure that the data is formatted correctly with relevant citation information.

Visualizing Clusters:

Once the data is loaded, VOS Viewer typically performs clustering based on the co-citation relationships.

Use the visualization options to generate a map that displays clusters. These clusters are usually represented by different colors or shapes.

Cluster Identification:

Inspect the map for clusters of nodes (representing citations or documents) that are visually distinct from others. They often form groups with shared connections or similar themes.

Look for areas where nodes are densely connected within a specific region of the visualization.

Naming the Clusters:

VOS Viewer might automatically assign numbers or labels to clusters. However, you can assign names manually based on your understanding of the content or topic represented by each cluster.

To name a cluster, click on it or select the nodes within it. Then, use VOS Viewer's interface to add a label or description to that particular cluster.

Analyzing and Refining:

Explore the content of each cluster by examining the citations or documents it contains. Identify common themes, keywords, or prominent works within the cluster to help in naming it appropriately.

Refine your clusters by adjusting parameters such as the minimum number of citations for a cluster or the cluster density threshold. This can help in getting more accurate and meaningful clusters.

Remember, naming co-citation clusters is a subjective process that requires an understanding of the content and context of the documents being analyzed. It often involves a mix of automated clustering algorithms and manual interpretation to assign meaningful names to the clusters based on their thematic content or subject matter.

Is it always at the tip or sometimes on edges? Could be too much salt build up in soil or anthracnose or black spot.

You may add your maiden name to your profile as an alternative name. See "How do I add an alternative author name?" in https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292898263057 for instructions.

See "Another researcher has claimed my publications" in https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292798510993 for instructions how to correct this. But unlike this help page suggests, most probably it was not the other author himself who wrongly claimed authorship, but ResearchGate's automatic algorithm wrongly identified him as the author and assigned your publication to his profile. This is a frequent problem in ResearchGate in case of similar names.

Mirelle Carvalho Improving control over the quality of suppliers in bigger organizations can be achieved through several strategies. Here are a few suggestions:

1. Clearly define supplier requirements: Develop detailed and specific criteria for evaluating suppliers. This can include factors such as product quality, delivery time, pricing, compliance with regulations, and sustainability practices.

2. Implement a rigorous supplier selection process: Establish a systematic process for selecting suppliers that includes thorough background checks, reference checks, and site visits. This helps ensure that only high-quality suppliers are considered.

3. Establish performance metrics: Define key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure supplier performance. This can include metrics like on-time delivery, product defects, customer satisfaction, and responsiveness to issues. Regularly review and communicate these metrics with suppliers to drive continuous improvement.

4. Conduct supplier audits: Regularly audit suppliers to assess their adherence to quality standards, compliance with regulations, and overall performance. These audits can be conducted internally or by third-party organizations.

5. Implement supplier monitoring and feedback mechanisms: Set up a system to monitor supplier performance on an ongoing basis. This can involve regular communication, feedback sessions, and performance reviews. Promptly address any issues or concerns that arise.

6. Foster open communication: Establish a collaborative relationship with suppliers based on open and transparent communication. Encourage suppliers to share any challenges they face and work together to find solutions.

7. Implement supplier development programs: Provide support and resources to help suppliers improve their quality management systems. This can involve training programs, sharing best practices, and offering guidance on quality improvement initiatives.

8. Use technology and data analytics: Leverage technology solutions, such as supplier management software and data analytics tools, to track and analyze supplier performance. This can help identify trends, areas for improvement, and potential risks.

By implementing these strategies, organizations can enhance control over supplier quality and drive continuous improvement in their supply chain processes.

Here’s what I’ve done: when I have a pub that is in my maiden name, I have listed it and added my married name in brackets, as in Francis Harper [Barchi]. I’ve never encountered any difficulties handing the problem of attribution in this way.

Influenza viruses have 8 gene segments each. The serotype is based on hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes (H1N1, H5N1, H3N2, etc) but the segments re-assort quite often.

The Influenza A serotypes that circulate in humans are less diverse than those that circulate in wild birds. For example, we don't see many H7 viruses in humans, we see more H3N2 and a few other prominent lineages in humans.

I downloaded over 5,000 PB1 gene segments from H7 Influenza A from GISAID database and aligned them and built a phylogenetic tree. Then I colored H7N2 orange, H7N3 blue, and H7N3 green leaving the rest black to make the attached figures. In Fig 1 you see a lineage of PB1 segments that seem to get around into various N virus serotypes (remember these are all H7 to begin with). While in Fig 2 you see a lineage of PB1 that has been associated almost exclusively with the N9 serotype.

Some common methods for collecting feedback:

1. Course Evaluations: Course evaluations are a widely used method for collecting feedback from students. These evaluations typically include a set of standardized questions that assess different aspects of the course, such as the instructor's teaching style, course content, organization, and student engagement. Course evaluations can be conducted online or through paper-based surveys.

2. Anonymous Surveys: Anonymous surveys allow students to provide feedback without revealing their identity. This can encourage honest and open responses. The surveys can be administered electronically using online survey tools or distributed as paper-based forms. Anonymous surveys can cover a range of topics, including specific assignments, classroom activities, or overall teaching effectiveness.

3. Focus Groups: Focus groups involve gathering a small group of students to have a discussion about their experiences in the course. This method allows for more in-depth feedback and facilitates group interactions and brainstorming. A facilitator guides the discussion using a set of predetermined questions or prompts. Focus groups can be particularly useful for exploring specific topics or gathering qualitative data.

4. One-on-One Meetings: Individual meetings with students provide an opportunity for personalized feedback. Professors can schedule brief meetings with students to discuss their experiences, concerns, and suggestions. This method allows for a more personal and detailed conversation, which can uncover valuable insights. However, it may not be feasible for large class sizes.

5. Online Discussion Boards: Online discussion boards or forums provide a platform for students to share their feedback and engage in discussions asynchronously. Professors can create dedicated discussion threads for feedback or allow students to provide feedback in existing course-related discussions. Online platforms can facilitate peer-to-peer feedback as well.

6. Mid-semester Feedback: Mid-semester feedback is a formative assessment method where professors solicit feedback midway through the course. This allows for timely adjustments and improvements. Professors can use anonymous surveys or class discussions to gather feedback on specific aspects of the course and address any concerns while the course is still in progress.

It's important to consider a combination of methods to gather comprehensive feedback.

Hope it helps

No dear Rasool.

There are many different bacteria that can give red colonies, so you shouldn't make any assumptions from the color. For example Staph aureaus can give red colonies, Serratia marscens, some Halobacter species, and according to Jakub Grzesiak some Fusarium species.

How do I edit my research item's details? is well described topic at R^G Help Center page:

@Wolfgang R. Dick

Thank you. Then for me, the fast publication is better.(I will send it to the journal where previous works of that journal cited). There is at least a guarantee that will be published after peer review. Otherwise others journals will keep it for 6 months and reject finally.

See "A publication in my profile doesn’t belong to me" in https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292798510993 for instructions how to remove this publication from your profile.

Thanks Forhad for sending the document. However, please note that she passed two examinations, viz. LICENCE ÈS SCIENCES PHYSIQUES AND LICENCE ÈS MATHÉMATIQUE . I am confused whether each of this degree (LICENCE ÈS SCIENCES or LICENCE ÈS MATHÉMATIQUE) is equivalent to Bachelor of Science or Master of Science. I consulted many documents but unable to find consensus view. Many authors have mentioned this as Bachelor of Science, others as Master of Science. I sent few mails to the experts on this issue and expecting reply from them.

Thank you once again for your cooperation.

With best wishes

Bidhan

within provided code, it seems that you are creating a reference point called `myRP` at coordinates (150.0, 10.0, 0.0) in the part named 'PART-1'. Then, you attempt to find the reference point at the same coordinates using `r.findAt((150.0, 10.0, 0.0),)` and store it in `myRP_Position`. Finally, you create a set named 'RP' with the reference point `myRP_Position`.

The issue in your code lies in the creation of the set. Instead of passing the reference point `myRP_Position` directly to `Set(referencePoints=refPoints1, name='RP')`, you need to pass the actual reference point object `myRP`. Here's the corrected code:

```python

myRP = mdb.models[name].parts['PART-1'].ReferencePoint(point=(150.0, 10.0, 0.0))

refPoints1 = (myRP,)

mdb.models[name].parts['PART-1'].Set(referencePoints=refPoints1, name='RP')

```

By using `refPoints1 = (myRP,)`, you create a tuple with the reference point object `myRP` as its only element. Then, this tuple is passed to `Set(referencePoints=refPoints1, name='RP')` to create the set named 'RP' with the reference point `myRP`.

Make sure to verify that the part named 'PART-1' exists in the model named `name` and that you have the necessary permissions and access to create reference points and sets in that part.

Hope it helps

When you export a citation, e.g. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374925263/citation/download, the title of the journal is indicated. (See https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_I_easily_export_my_publications_from_ResearchGate_into_citations for this export method.) However, I guess you mean that a journal is generally missing in ResearchGate's database. See my reply to https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_add_a_new_journal2 for an explanation and a recommendation what you can do.

See "How do I edit my research item's details?" in https://explore.researchgate.net/display/support/Reviewing%2C+featuring%2C+and+editing+your+research for instructions.

See "A researcher has wrongly claimed co-authorship of my publication" in https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292798510993 for instructions how to correct this. But unlike this help page suggests, most probably it was not the other author himself who wrongly claimed authorship, but ResearchGate's automatic algorithm wrongly identified him as co-author and assigned your publications to his profile. This is a frequent problem in ResearchGate in case of similar names.

You may have a look at 2021 question/ answer

cite: ... rings were first introduced as Dedekind domain in number theory ...

Please note that you wrote to the ResearchGate community, not to the RG team. However, it is not worth writing to them because they do not have the capacitiy to add millions of publications by hand - the individual authors are expected to do this. See this help page ("How to add research") for instructions how to add published or unpublished research to ResearchGate: https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293005132305

First of all, you should search whether some of your publications are already there; in these cases, you just have to claim your authorship. See my reply to https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_undo_the_removal_of_recent_publications_that_belong_to_me for three search possibilities.

As I work with Mendeley, the reference style for Bulletin of Materials Science does not exist in Mendeley.

So, is there a journal that uses the same referencing style :

[1] auteur1 initial1, Auteur2 initial2, ...., auteur6 initial6 et al year journal name (abbreviation) volume (bold) page

''There is a real Bharatvarsha—a complete India. Unless we establish ourselves there, we can’t absorb its true living essence into our minds and hearts. Therefore I say, forgetting all else, discarding book-learning, the lure of prestige, and the temptation of odd profits, we must set sail for that very port, whether we drown or perish. No wonder I can never forget the true, complete image of Bharatvarsha.''

--Rabindranath Tagore

antconc maybe? https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

Mrs Emesi

Of course! When searching for reputable journals to publish your research, it's crucial to take into account your particular academic discipline. It's not uncommon for scholars to possess high-quality research articles but lack the knowledge of how to navigate the process of publication, such as identifying fast-responding journals or understanding the submission procedures. To assist with this, I've included a list of links to SCI and Scopus journals for your reference

SCI journals: https://researchbrains.com/fast-publishing-sci-journals/

Scopus journals: https://researchbrains.com/fast-responding-scopus-indexed-journals/

Please note that you wrote to the ResearchGate community, not to the RG team. You may try to contact them at https://www.researchgate.net/contact.

Several years ago, it was possible to add journal names manually. Then they changed this, although many journals are missing in RG's database. See https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293139566353: "Due to resourcing constraints, please understand that we cannot accept requests to manually add journals to our database. Currently, we only import journal data from CrossRef. ..." - When a journal is missing in RG's database, I add the bibliographic data to the abstract field (like in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268925009 or https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344474227).

Dear friend: indeed, you need to know what grammatical gender the final part of the compound belongs to in Latin, when establishing the agreement of the adjective. So, for example, if the species to be cataloged is a tree, you should know that trees are normally feminine in Latin, so the ending of the adjective must be feminine. In the case of "Pseudempleurosoma" the word is of neuter gender (because its ending word is a greek neuter one), so the adjective should be "guanabarense", which is neuter, and not "gunabarensis", which is either masculine or feminine. And yes, the dictionary clarifies these things, but it is much better to go to a Latinist at your university: he will know very well how to correctly describe that species in Latin.

@petrajohannabrzank Getting that resolved is simple. Leaving one's name out of a scheduled presentation might be an oversight from the publisher or the agency that is assigned with such a responsibility. Call for a re-publication or for a re-scheduled presentation.

Rizal M Suhardi, Aahed Alhamamy & Muhammad Azhar Kholidi

It is Lepidagathis inaequalis C.B.Clarke ex Elmer of Acanthaceae family.

Thanks!

MEDIP is a recent launched apps which is amazing

Genera and species names should be in italics when referring to the organisms, but words (or abbreviations) like "species" should not. Thus, if saying Rhizoctonia spp., the genus is in italics while the abbreviation for species is not. Similarly, for a single, unknown species, one would not have the abbreviation in italics, like Fusarium sp. If you are specifying a known species, that also would be in italics, like Colletotrichum coccodes.

See "Another researcher has claimed my publications" in https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292798510993 for instructions how to correct this. But unlike this help page suggests, most probably it was not the other author himself who wrongly claimed authorship, but ResearchGate's automatic algorithm wrongly identified him as the author and assigned your publications to his profile. This is a frequent problem in ResearchGate in case of similar names, caused by an automatic algorithm which is far from being perfect.

Meticulously engineered better by developing.

Click on "Add more authors" below the authors box, type in a name and select the correct author from the drop-down menu which will appear. Your own name appears in the authors box by default when you start creating a new research item page. But you can also add is as described.

ITP,

DENGUE HEMORRHAGIC FEVER

MALARIA

LEUKEMIA

APLASTIC ANEMIA

TTP

I can help.Don't hesitate to contact me via email : prosper.languages@kp.ac.rw or murwaprosper17@gmail.com or prosper.educ.produce@gmail.com

Unfortunately, I am not able to answer at this question. But I suggest, you should agree it with the editors of your papers. Obviously one should need a variant in Latin characters and another one in Greek characters.

Brajamohan Sahoo, you are welcome, and certainly other recent MCDM papers include 2023 "New distributed-topsis approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems in a big data context" - good luck.

Dear Ashraf Magableh As indicated by Wolfgang R. Dick (re)claim the paper:

Best regards.

Harry Sumartin Sumartin The pictured organisms resemble sea cucumbers.

The second image may be of a Black teatfish (Holothuria (Microthele) nobilis) (https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=210835).

Consult these for further information;

- https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/invertebrates/facts/sea-cucumbers

- https://www.fao.org/3/i2741e/i2741e07.pdf

- https://library.sprep.org/sites/default/files/34_0.pdf

-

Vahid Hajiloo

This plant is Prosopis farcta (Banks & Sol.) J. F. Macbr. of Fabaceae family.

Thanks!

Thank you Alex ! It is important that were YOUR photos, to put you in the credits of the figure, since we don't take photos from Internet to avoid author rights.... They were taken by you? Do you have them separated ? Can you send to me to aleferreira1245@gmail.com?

Scott Gordon-Wylie

I gave a short answer to a simple question, although it could be lengthened. Your answer sparks a discussion that will be helpful to students. We have divided the concepts of dissolution and chemical reaction. Why then again mislead students with the phrase “you dissolve gold in aqua regia”. This is not a dissolution, but a redox reaction. You replace the term chemical reaction with 'transformation'. Your sentence "For strong bonds, 'dissolution' is not really the right concept" is difficult to understand.

The copper atom is surrounded by four oxygen atoms and has a distorted planar configuration in the elementary crystal lattice. The bonds between the copper atom and oxygen are covalent. This configuration is repeated throughout the copper oxide grain. This elementary crystal lattice cannot be distributed in a solvent (water) with a gain in changing the Gibbs energy. Kitchen salt sodium chloride spontaneously distributes in water to form sodium and chlorine ions, since the system benefits in Gibbs energy compared to the components crystalline salt and water.

as a rule, a credit card is a type of credit, so scoring is also checked with this form of financing.

See this instruction how to merge duplicate profiles: https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292803187473

See "How do I edit my research item's details?" in https://explore.researchgate.net/display/support/Reviewing%2C+featuring%2C+and+editing+your+research for instructions how to change titles of papers and other details.

Ands see https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14292798510993 for instructions how to change the names of (co-)authors.

Okay, have you checked the disk space?

See these related discussions, particularly my replies:

The current research environment, characterised by hyper-competition and a relentless drive for research output, has placed unique pressures on research authors and peer reviewers. Part of the solution, lies in how publishers can combine technology and human resources in just the right way. Many research publishers believe that putting researchers at the heart of publishing is an essential part of our work to add trust and value to the research system. This includes doing our best to relieve some of the pressure researchers face, in part by making everything we do for them more streamlined. That is why we are investing in systems to help researchers to publish their peer-reviewed research as quickly as possible, and to communicate it in the most effective ways...

I presume that you are not looking for something to conceal plagiarism!

The best way to deal with plagiarism is to add a reference to any fact, statement or idea that is not your own. Do not alter text from other writers – they did their best to express themselves as clearly and accurately as possible, so rewriting it can only make it less clear and/or less accurate.

Copyleaks.com is a good site for troubleshooting your work.

Thank you

Postmodern authors like Kurt Vonnegut in "Breakfast of Champions" and Milan Kundera in "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" introduce themselves as characters or narrators in their works.

In the Theater of the Absurd, playwrights like Samuel Beckett in "Krapp's Last Tape" and Eugène Ionesco in "Exit the King" incorporate elements of self-reflection and self-exploration through characters who bear similarities to the authors themselves

Here is the SDS of methyl orange - I have no clue whether it has lambda max 418 nm but if you have a spectrophotometer (dual) then that does not matter

Patient-Centric Healthcare 4.0: Exploring Blockchain’s Role in Enhancing Patient Experience

There are many ways to do it. But for almost all of them, the sequence names will have to be created with labels that will then be used to color each OTU by some aspect of the name.

The Interactive Tree of Life project is one good resource:

The HIV Databases at LANL provides another simple tree coloring service:

The Augur and Auspice tools are also very helpful:

In Figtree, you can select individual OTUs, groups of OTUs based on a character set in the names, or select clades, and then color the brnaches, the OTU names, or both.

Tekabe Seifu The error message you're encountering, "Error Number: 91 - Error Message: Object reference not set to an instance of an object," is a common runtime error in programming and GIS software. It typically occurs when the software is trying to access an object or variable that hasn't been initialized or doesn't exist.

Here are some steps to troubleshoot and potentially resolve this issue:

1. Check Data Sources: Ensure that all the necessary data sources and layers required for watershed delineation in ARCSWAT are correctly specified and accessible. Verify that the DEM (Digital Elevation Model) data is correctly linked.

2. Data Integrity: Make sure the DEM data is in the correct format and is not corrupted. Errors can occur if there are issues with the DEM file itself.

3 Software Version Compatibility: Ensure that the version of ARCSWAT you are using (2012) is compatible with ARCGIS 10.7.1. Sometimes, using versions that are not fully compatible can lead to errors.

4. Environment Settings: Check if any required environment settings or variables are missing or misconfigured. This can include paths to data directories or temporary storage locations.

5. Updates and Patches: Make sure you have applied any necessary updates or patches for both ARCSWAT and ARCGIS. Sometimes, software updates address known issues.

6. Permissions: Ensure that you have the necessary permissions to access and modify data and files related to your project. Lack of permissions can lead to errors.

7. Documentation and Support Consult the official documentation for ARCSWAT and ARCGIS for troubleshooting guidance. You can also reach out to their support or user community for assistance. They may have specific solutions or workarounds for this error.

8. Debugging: If you have programming experience, you can try to debug the specific line of code mentioned in the error message (Procedure: error line). This may provide insights into what's causing the issue.

9. Backup and Restore: Consider restoring your project to a previous state if you have a backup. Sometimes, this can help if the error was introduced due to recent changes.

Remember to back up your project and data before making significant changes or modifications. Additionally, provide as much detail as possible when seeking assistance from forums, user communities, or technical support. Information about your project setup, data sources, and the steps leading to the error can be invaluable in diagnosing and resolving the problem.

The simplest the best. Stick with the chk file and eventually convert it to fchk with formchk.

I have found an answer in an old paper by Misislav Demerec and Ugo Fano (Genetics 1943;30:119).

The Greek-named phages α and γ (so called because these symbols were available in Luria's typewriter) have been named T1 and T2, respectively.

The T3 to T7 came from other laboratories.

What are Q, B and M depicting, if you may clarify that. I feel that will help in understanding the image and its name.

no suggestions

Hi, Ajit. Thank you for your advice. How create a new category - technically? I cannot figure out how to do it. Thanks. H

Yes :)

Most probably it is Penicillium spp.

Hello David Schad

Rac1 was originally identified in 1989 in human platelets as a substrate of the botulinum toxin from which its name derives as Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate.

Please refer to the article attached below for more information.

Rac1 belongs to the Rho family of small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and is ubiquitously expressed. It exists in two conformational states, an inactive GDP-bound form and an active GTP-bound form. The transition from one form to another occurs upon stimuli and depends on GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which inactivate Rac1, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which convert Rac1 to its active form.

Rac1 has diverse and broad cellular functions. It serves as a conformational switch in several signal transduction pathways. One of its primary functions identified, far away the most characterized, is the regulation of actin cytoskeleton organization and dynamics, in the migratory structures such as filopodia and lamellipodia. Other functions include the role in cell polarity, gene expression, cell-cycle progression, and cell survival.

You may want to refer to the article attached below.

Best.

Usually, if the address (URL) of a page has changed, it may take from hours to weeks until Google finds it again. They are not able to scan the complete Internet each day. The problem is that the ResearchGate ID of your publication has changed. One of the reasons may be that there were two pages for this publication (one created automatically by RG, one created by you), and a RG algorithm merged these two. See the section "Why are there duplicate research items on my profile?" in the help page https://help.researchgate.net/hc/en-us/articles/14293005132305-How-to-add-research for explanations. The old URL was https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372956372, the new one is https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373865347. You just have to wait until Google will find the new page. However, if someone searches for the title of you publication, the second search result is your profile (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joaquin-Montes-2), and the correct link to your publication is there. Thus, it is possible to find your publication even now.

Even here, on RG net. Seek and you shall find.