Science method

Molecular Docking - Science method

Explore the latest questions and answers in Molecular Docking, and find Molecular Docking experts.
Questions related to Molecular Docking
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
I used AlphaFold to predict the 3D structure of a protein target that is not available in PDB. However, the prediction has low confidence values (low pLDDT scores). Should I proceed with molecular docking using this structure, or should I refine it first? If refinement is necessary, what are the best approaches to improve its reliability for drug design? Any recommendations or relevant research papers would be greatly appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
it means that your model has low confidence
try to Evaluate the pLDDT Scores
as there is this limit which suggests thet the pLDDT < 50: These regions are highly unreliable and shouldn’t be used for docking or further analysis. pLDDT 50–70: These regions are moderately reliable but might need refinement before use. pLDDT > 70: These regions are generally trustworthy and can be used for docking or other studies.
or avoid performing molecular docking on such low confidence protein model try to develop a new one, hope it helps ;]
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
I am having problem in the selection of monomeric human insulin pdb structure for the development of aptamer via molecular docking and molecular dynamics. How should I select the best suit one which represent the native structure of active insulin in human body. Which technique is preferred, is it X-ray diffraction or NMR structure? Based on the validation report, I found out that there are outliers in all the pdb structure, how should I fixed it. Before molecular analysis, the pdb structure should be properly checked and repaired, is there any detailed guidelines/protocol on this? I have no idea on how to identify the errors (things to be investigated) and the way to fix it. Your opinion is highly appreciated, thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Chong your very welcome:) and always feel free to inquire further!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
Excuse me, I am learning how to do molecular docking and some targets I have docked have resulted with many favorable bonds but also with many unfavorable bonds in red. My question is, is there any criterion to know if the simulation, despite the unfavorable bonds, could allow molecular docking and induce or inhibit some biological mechanism? Thank you very much for your help.
Relevant answer
Answer
yes, there will be always a possibility for the ligand to form weak bond interactions along with desired strong bond interactions, but it does not mean that the interactions formed during the molecular docking are irrelevant. but as always if you want to ensure that it is showing inhibition or not you need to validate the process by superimposing the existing reference molecules as standard with your hit molecule and then establish the interaction fingerprint. after this, you can proceed with Molecular dynamics simulation studies to validate the stability of the small molecule and protein complex.
hope it solves your doubts, good luck with your research :]
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Is it common practice to do multiple trials of your molecular docking simulation? For example, you want to check binding affinity of a certain phytochemicals with an enzyme. Do you have to perform the same molecular docking algorithm thrice (for three trials) or is just once enough? This is using Autodock Vina.
Relevant answer
Answer
Once is enough. 😊
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
this is need for molecular docking
Relevant answer
Answer
If it is a Ligand/small molecule, then use openbabel. If it's a protein then use MGLtools.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
Hello, do you need basic programs for molecular docking?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, common programs include AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, SwissDock, and Dock6.
All of which can we easily done at mdsim360.com, a new platform that lets you run MD simulations entirely online without local installation.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Dear colleagues,
I have conducted an experimental study on NO production using RAW 264.7 cells and obtained promising results. I am now looking to deepen my understanding of the underlying mechanisms through in silico approaches, such as molecular docking, pathway analysis, or ADME/Tox predictions.If you have expertise in in silico methods or are interested in collaborating on this project, please feel free to contact me. I would greatly appreciate your insights and guidance to advance this work.Thank you in advance for your time and consideration!
Best regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
Key Aspects of In Silico Analysis on NO Production Mechanisms:
  1. Pathway Analysis:NO is primarily synthesized by nitric oxide synthases (NOS), including endothelial (eNOS), neuronal (nNOS), and inducible (iNOS) isoforms. In silico tools can model the enzymatic pathways, study substrate-enzyme interactions (e.g., L-arginine with NOS), and analyze cofactors like tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) and oxygen.
  2. Gene and Protein Interaction Networks:Computational methods like gene ontology (GO) analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks can identify genes and proteins regulating NO production. Tools like STRING or Cytoscape help map these networks and reveal potential regulatory mechanisms.
  3. Simulation of NO Dynamics:Mathematical modeling can simulate NO production under various conditions, such as hypoxia, inflammation, or oxidative stress. Tools like MATLAB, COPASI, or CellDesigner can be used to create dynamic models of NO production.
  4. Drug Screening and Binding Studies:Molecular docking and dynamics simulations can predict how small molecules or inhibitors interact with NOS enzymes. This is useful for identifying potential drugs that modulate NO production.
  5. Omics Data Integration:Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data can be integrated to understand how different stimuli (e.g., cytokines or stress) influence NO production. Databases like KEGG, Reactome, and BioCyc provide pathway information for analysis.
  6. Impact of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS):NO interacts with ROS to form reactive nitrogen species (RNS), impacting cellular signaling and damage. Computational tools can model these interactions and their downstream effects.
  7. Disease Mechanisms and Therapeutic Insights:NO is involved in various physiological and pathological processes, such as vasodilation, immune response, and neurodegeneration. In silico analysis can help identify how dysregulated NO production contributes to diseases like hypertension, diabetes, or neurodegenerative disorders.
Tools and Software Commonly Used:
  • Pathway Databases: KEGG, Reactome, BioCyc.
  • Molecular Docking: AutoDock, Schrödinger, MOE.
  • Modeling and Simulation: COPASI, MATLAB, CellDesigner.
  • Network Analysis: Cytoscape, STRING, GeneMANIA.
  • Omics Analysis: DAVID, MetaboAnalyst, IPA.
By combining computational approaches with experimental data, in silico analysis provides a powerful framework to study the mechanisms of NO production, predict regulatory dynamics, and explore therapeutic strategies.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
11 answers
Hi researchers,
I have downloaded 20,000 compounds from databases in .sdf format in a single file (size: 108 GB).
Could someone guide me on splitting the enormous single ligand file into separate files? In the past, I've used open babel to convert the file from .sdf into .pdb. But, I wish to split this vast database ligand file into separate ligand files for molecular docking. Can I use the Open babel, command prompt for this work? Kindly do give suggestions on this issue.
thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi!
Sorry for jumping into this discussion.
I have a combined SDF file containing 31561 molecules, which I want to split into separate pdbqt structure, and energy minimize them, with their original IDs being retained.
My combined SDF file has structures starting with CMNPD, followed by some random number, and not exactly in the serial order.
I command i used to convert SDF to PDBQT is,
obabel -isdf my-input.sdf -osdf output_{}.sdf --split all
giving all autogenerated numbers like 1,2,3,.... and not the original IDs.
Any suggestion on how to retain the original IDs from the SDF file while converting them?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
this technique is very important to research can any one help me for my research
Relevant answer
Answer
Its time saving and support by evidence in research. Consequently provide direction.
Its free software also and most acceptable, reliable autodock vina
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hi
Can anyone suggest free and easy-handling AI-assisted software or web servers for protein-ligand molecular docking and molecular dynamics? f
Relevant answer
For Docking, MzDock and LightDock
For Simulations, MDsrv and MDWeb
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I am using HDOCK to perform molecular docking, but HDOCK has a limit of 500 nucleotides for the receptor. However, we want to perform docking on the entire 3' UTR region. Can anyone suggest a solution to this problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
While AutoDock is primarily designed for protein-ligand docking, it's not the ideal tool for docking microRNA (miRNA) and mRNA.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I downloaded the ligand file in SDF format from the ZINC database, then converted it into PDB format using OpenBabelGUI. This file was then opened in AutoDock Vina and converted into PDBQT format, and finally, it was docked with the enzyme's active site. After docking in the command prompt and splitting via vina_split.exe, different poses of the ligand in the enzyme's active site were found. When this ligand file is opened in Biovia Discovery Studio for visualizing ligand interactions, I face difficulties with the ligand breaking apart. If anyone can help me resolve this problem, I would be grateful.
Relevant answer
Answer
To solve this problem:
  • Open the original SDF or PDB file of the ligand in Biovia Discovery Studio or PyMOL to ensure that the bond connectivity is intact.
  • Use OpenBabel to reconvert the ligand back to PDB and check if any bonds are missing or broken.
  • Ensure Biovia is set to "rebuild" or "infer" bond connectivity when loading files. This option can sometimes correct broken segments automatically.
  • If the ligand breaks apart, you can manually edit the PDB file in a text editor to merge fragments. Ensure each segment has the same chain ID and residue number
  • Use PyMOL or Chimera as alternative visualization tools if Biovia Discovery Studio does not handle the split poses well
  • Also you can do energy minimization to avoid this problem
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Dear all,
I am working with five proteins and would like to investigate their interactions when present together in a single solution. Could you suggest any online tools or platforms capable of performing molecular docking for multiple proteins simultaneously?
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
You can try HADDOCK which is a great platform for multi-protein docking. It is powered by molecular mechanics and even allows coarse-graining for larger complexes.
To refine your docking setup, PeSTo (Protein Structure Transformer) is useful for predicting protein binding sites on your proteins which can then be defined as active residues for docking with HADDOCK.
If you're exploring beyond traditional docking, AI-based tools like AlphaFold are worth considering for predicting multi-subunit protein assemblies even though they are not docking tools.
Here is another tool that integrates AlphaFold with Monte Carlo tree search which can be beneficial in predicting the structure of protein complexes.
Hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
I was doing blink docking using AutoDock Vina. All the parameters are same, ligand and receptor also the same, just that the grid box center is a little bit different (I did at different time frame, so I set the grid box twice with autodock tools). By principle, isnt it both the results should be the same, since the grid box have covered the whole receptor. Can any one explain why I get different results? And which one should I take?
Relevant answer
Answer
Chong Qi In theory, you could have several poses energetically similar and the program will give you a different pose each time. You could perform several runs and see if certain poses appear more often than others. We proposed a way to perform these blind dockings and have an idea of what the program is doing and why it is picking certain poses. Have a look here:
hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
Please suggest me how to select a protein in U-87 cell line for molecular docking study of isatin derivatives against cancer cell.
What is the criteria to select a suitable protein for docking study?
Relevant answer
To select a target different parameters must be taken into consideration
First, according to types what type of your compounds belong to type I, type 1.5 or type II or type III, or type IV because all type has pharmacophore features if determine the type you can know the cancer-specific for and determine the suitable enzyme and select the best ligand, and then you can select the best PDB
Second from the structure of your compound prepared and what functional groups you added polar or non-polar and so on
So to design type I kinase inhibitors
There are common pharmacophore features for type I inhibitors according to the Traxler pharmacophore model.
1-Heterocyclic ring system
Heterocyclic ring system core that occupies the purine binding site which maintains on hydrogen bond interaction and shares at least one or two hydrogen bond donors or acceptors. 2-Head Hydrophilic substituents extend in the solvent-exposed area.
3-Tail Aryl ring occupies the hydrophobic pocket.
To design type II inhibitors
Type IIA kinase inhibitors are designed around four key pharmacophoric features,
1. Hinge Region: This region contains a flat heteroaromatic moiety that
interacts with the residues Glu917 and/or Cys919, which is crucial for
binding.
2. Linker Region: A properly sized linker is needed between the ATP-binding
domain and the DFG domain to ensure a good fit.
3. DFG Domain: The residues Glu885 and Asp1046 are essential for forming
hydrogen bonds, playing a key role in the inhibitor's activity.
4. Allosteric Region: There are hydrophobic interactions between the terminal hydrophobic group and the allosteric region of the inactive receptor, which strengthens the binding.
so you can draw your structure we can assist you in determining the target and the cancer cell related to an sha allah
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
I want to check the antioxidant activity of a organic derivative on xanthine oxidase enzyme using molecular docking . For this I have downloaded the Bovine milk XO enzyme from PDB. The active site of the enzyme contains molybdopterin cofactor. Autodock4 shows some errors when I try to run it. I think this may be due to the Mo atom. Anyone please help me to resolve this problem.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Prof Renjith Raveendran Pillai,
We also encountered this problem. I am wondering whether you finally tackle this Mo issue. Thank you.
Best wishes,
Hong
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
9 answers
This is what it shows on my computer.
Please help
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
I am getting back to docking. I am having issue in running autodock after doing autogrid. I have all the .pad files and my .dat files in my working directory. I am able to start the autodock run but it gets done within seconds and I can not see delta G values. Do you know how to change this?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I have predicted (human) resistin structure using modeller, phyre and itasser and none of the structures I received showed suitable binding energy with known drug (eg-masoprocol) after docking, and I am unable to complete the study.
Relevant answer
Answer
Rajeshwari Ganapathy : You could use AlphaFold2. Please note that AlphaFold3 could be even better, but the user policy for AlphaFord3 currently does not allow its use for predicting structures that would be employed subsequently as docking targets.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Hi guys, I am trying to design an aptamer for insulin via in silico methods.
I used aptcad webserver for docking but kept showing failed, stated to try again with smaller molecule. Is it because the insulin structure too big? But my target is insulin, how should I do in this case?
Anyone can help with this situation?
Relevant answer
Answer
In such a case select one chain at once rather than the entire structure of insulin receptor. If the co-crystallized ligand is present in all chains lets say A and B, in that case, docking can be performed on any one chain. If not, then check the chains contributing to interactions with co-crystallized ligand. If no co-crystallized ligand is available, perform binding site prediction and then continue with docking on one particular binding cavity of one chain.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
The screenshot of the error has been added. It popped up while the receptor molecule was adding just in the beginning of the process.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
Sure, I will try it. Thanks. Jobin Thomas
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
After greetings...
Can I get the full molecular docking program...
I downloaded the 2015 version but it doesn't work...
I hope anyone with a full and activated version can help me...
Thank you very much
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much...
I shall experiment the methods that's you mentioned...
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
I am not a specialist in molecular docking, but the applications interest me. I would like to know if it is possible and interesting to perform molecular docking of a mixture of molecules on the same target? And is there a computational technique to predict the assembly of molecules in the most stable state before starting the docking?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks very much
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
It’s always exciting to see how computational tools are revolutionizing drug design and discovery. Techniques like molecular docking, pharmacophore modeling, ADME Study and DFT simulations are not only speeding up the process but also allowing for more precise predictions of molecular behavior. These advancements enable us to dive deep into molecular interactions and predict therapeutic potential with greater accuracy. It’s fascinating to witness the fusion of chemistry, biology, and technology in the development of innovative solutions for real-world challenges.
#DrugDiscovery hashtag#ComputationalChemistry hashtag#MolecularModeling hashtag#PharmaceuticalResearch
Relevant answer
Answer
I completely agree! These computational tools are truly streamlining the drug discovery process, enabling faster and more accurate predictions. It's fascinating to see how technology is transforming the way we approach complex biological and chemical challenges.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hi all, I am working on the protein-protein interaction study. The homology modeling protein structure was in good quality which Ramachandran plot shown more than 97% of aa are in the most favoured region. In addition, the sequence similarity is high which is about 70% similarity to the reference crystal structure. Hence, I proceed to protein-protein docking, which docked the homology protein structure (receptor) with another protein crystal structure (ligand). I have generated a set of molecular interaction data and is going to publish the works. However, I found that most of the journal will require MD. Is there any journal that can accept the molecular docking data without MD?
Relevant answer
Answer
It would be difficult to publish a study that involved only docking without substantial additional computational and/or experimental laboratory results. Moreover, protein-protein docking is particularly problematic, especially if one of the docking partners is a homology model. Regarding the assessment of the quality of protein structures, there are additional criteria to consider beyond a Ramachandran plot -- I suggest using the Molprobity server to get a more complete evaluation. In addition, for protein-protein complexes, consider using AlphaFold multimer or AlphaFold3.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Could you please advise on how to perform molecular docking for polysaccharides (large molecules)? I have previously used Glide in Schrödinger for small molecule docking, but what would be the most appropriate software or approach for handling polysaccharides?
Could you provide any further guidance or recommendations on this matter?
Relevant answer
Answer
Molecular docking of polysaccharides, which are large, complex carbohydrates, presents unique challenges compared to small molecules due to their size, flexibility, and the presence of multiple hydroxyl groups that can participate in hydrogen bonding. Here’s a general approach and some software recommendations for performing molecular docking with polysaccharides:
Software Recommendations:
  1. GROMACS with HADDOCK: HADDOCK is a software for macromolecular docking, and it can be used in conjunction with GROMACS for molecular dynamics simulations. It is capable of handling large and flexible molecules like polysaccharides.
  2. Rosetta: Rosetta is a suite of software for macromolecular modeling, which includes a protocol for carbohydrate docking called CARDS (Carbohydrate Docking with Rosetta and Dynamics). It is specifically designed for the modeling of carbohydrates and their interactions.
  3. AutoDock: Although primarily used for small molecules, AutoDock can be used for larger molecules if you have a powerful enough computer. The newer version, AutoDock4, has some capabilities for handling larger ligands.
  4. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment): MOE has tools for handling large and flexible molecules and can be used for docking polysaccharides to proteins.
  5. CHARMM: CHARMM is a comprehensive molecular modeling package that can be used for simulating and analyzing biological macromolecules, including carbohydrates.
Approach for Docking Polysaccharides:
  1. Preparation of Polysaccharide Structure:Use software like CHARMM, GlycanBuilder, or other carbohydrate modeling tools to build the 3D structure of the polysaccharide. Perform energy minimization and molecular dynamics simulations to refine the structure and account for flexibility.
  2. Receptor Preparation:The protein or receptor target should be prepared in a similar way to small molecule docking: protonation, energy minimization, and removal of any unnecessary solvent molecules or crystallographic waters.
  3. Docking:Define the binding site on the receptor where the polysaccharide is expected to bind. Use the chosen software to perform the docking. With software like HADDOCK or Rosetta, you can use information from experiments (e.g., NMR or X-ray crystallography data) to guide the docking process. Account for the flexibility of both the polysaccharide and the receptor. This might involve sampling different conformations of the polysaccharide and using ensemble docking techniques.
  4. Scoring and Selection:Evaluate the docked poses using appropriate scoring functions. For polysaccharides, scoring functions that include terms for hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions will be particularly important. Select the best-scored poses for further analysis.
  5. Post-Docking Analysis:Perform molecular dynamics simulations on the docked complexes to assess their stability and to refine the binding mode. Analyze the interactions between the polysaccharide and the receptor using tools like MDAnalysis or PyMOL.
Additional Recommendations:
  • Parameterization: Ensure that the force fields and parameters used in your simulations are suitable for carbohydrates.
  • Computational Resources: Docking polysaccharides is computationally intensive. Make sure you have access to sufficient computational resources.
  • Validation: Validate your docking approach with known structures of carbohydrate-protein complexes if available.
  • Expertise: The process of docking large, flexible molecules like polysaccharides often requires a deep understanding of both the software and the biological system. Collaboration with experts in computational biology or bioinformatics can be beneficial.
Keep in mind that molecular docking is a complex process with many variables, and it often requires iterative refinement and validation to obtain reliable results.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I am currently working on a molecular docking project and have obtained results that I need help interpreting. I would greatly appreciate any guidance on how to analyze these results effectively, including insights about RMSD (Root Mean Square Deviation), binding affinities, binding poses, hydrogen bonds, and the amino acids involved in these interactions.
Any resources, tips, or personal experiences you could share would be immensely helpful!
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Interpreting and analyzing molecular docking results involves several key aspects, including evaluating binding affinities, analyzing binding poses, and understanding the interactions between the ligand and the target protein. Here’s a proposed guide (that I personally use) to effectively analyze your results:
1. Binding Affinity
  • Understanding ΔG: The binding affinity is often represented as a free energy change (ΔG). A more negative ΔG indicates a stronger binding affinity, suggesting that the ligand binds more tightly to the target protein. Conversely, a less negative or positive ΔG suggests weaker binding.
  • Comparing Ligands: When comparing different ligands, look for differences in their binding affinities. A significant difference in ΔG can indicate which ligand may be more effective at binding to the target.
2. Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD)
  • Definition: RMSD is a measure of the average distance between atoms of superimposed proteins. In docking studies, it is often used to evaluate the stability of the docked conformation compared to an experimental structure.
  • Interpreting RMSD Values: Lower RMSD values (typically <2 Å) indicate that the docked pose closely resembles the experimental structure, suggesting a reliable docking result. Higher RMSD values may indicate that the docking pose is less reliable or that the ligand may adopt a different conformation in solution.
3. Binding Poses
  • Visual Inspection: Use molecular visualization software to examine the binding poses of your ligands. Look at how well the ligand fits into the binding pocket of the target protein.
  • Key Interactions: Identify key interactions such as hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and ionic interactions. These interactions can provide insights into how well the ligand binds and its potential efficacy.
4. Hydrogen Bonds and Amino Acids Involved
  • Analyzing Hydrogen Bonds: Check for hydrogen bonds formed between the ligand and specific amino acids in the binding site. The presence of multiple hydrogen bonds typically indicates a stronger interaction.
  • Identifying Key Residues: Note which amino acids are involved in these interactions. Specific residues may be critical for binding and can be targets for mutagenesis studies to further explore their roles.
5. Additional Considerations
  • Cluster Analysis: If you have multiple docking poses, consider performing cluster analysis to identify common conformations and interactions across different runs.
  • Comparison with Experimental Data: If available, compare your docking results with experimental data such as IC50 values or binding assays to validate your findings.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Being a newbie, i want to eqip myself with the necessary Bioinformatic tools including molecular docking...Important materials, videos to introduce me to these tools are welcome..I really have a knack in this field.
Relevant answer
Answer
Every tool has a tutorial video or file; try to find them and follow their instructions to get your information. Be aware that bioinformatics is a wide world, so you have to read an article about your interest, then do the analysis one by one. 
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
I have tried many times to dock ubenimex n (Compound CID: 72172) with a protein but every time the ligand breaks into two pieces. Kindly help. i have used chemdraw, 3d sdf file, gaussian fchk file, mol2 file to convert the ligand into pdb file but every time Autodock splits the ligand. Hydrogens and charges were added. ligand is neutral.
Relevant answer
Answer
Ya there was some problem and it was now solved. Thanks for your answer.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
6 answers
Can multiple instances of the same ligand be docked to one macromolecule? For instance, can one ligand be docked and then the output used as input for a second docking of the same ligand, and so on?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yogesh Gaikwad Thank you for your answer Yogesh Gaikwad
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
I want to use ReverseDock for off-target analysis in molecular docking. How authenticate and reliable are the results of ReverseDock and can I put those results in my research paper ?
Relevant answer
Answer
ReverseDock is a computational tool designed for blind docking of ligands to multiple protein targets, based on AutoDock Vina. It ranks and predicts protein-ligand interactions, which makes it valuable for tasks like drug discovery and target identification. Its predictions are reasonably accurate, with successful identification of binding sites in 75% of cases and top-three ranking of complexes in 50% of cases in validation tests. However, like other docking tools, ReverseDock's results depend on the quality of input data and the conformational space sampled. It is recommended to complement its predictions with experimental validation, such as binding assays or structural studies​
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
7 answers
Hi every one
I have a peptide library (around 300 peptides) that I would like to dock peptides to its target while I want a high throughput molecular docking webserver or software to do this. Does anyone know any web server or software for this purpose?
Relevant answer
Answer
thanks for your answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Hi
I would like to do molecular docking for my protein with metalloids such as arsenate, nitrate, selenate. I am able to dock for nitrate and selenate on the CB dock website. However, I am getting errors when I try to do that for arsenate. Is there a way to find why the error message and how to fix it in CB dock? or please suggest good and reliable free software for docking in Mac OS? I have the latest version of OS software (Monterey).
Please suggest or recommend, how to perform this work.
Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone, I'm currently working on an autodock4 and I've received those warning in my running process. I don't know how to fix or how it affects to my final results. Attached below are my dpf file and cmd warning.
Thanks for your advices.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
10 answers
I use the free version of PyRx. It is bugging me for quite some time that every time I try to dock a specific ligand with a specific protein, the binding affinity differs. Sometimes, the difference is too much. For your convenience, I am giving an overall idea of how I do that.
1) At first, I prepare the ligand and protein and minimize their energies with different softwares.
2) Then I dock them in PyRx.
I follow the the procedure every time. However, the results are not the same. Can anyone help me out?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
what are informations that we extract from DLG file of autodock4 and what conclusion can we get
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I have performed multiple ligand molecular docking using AutoDock Vina in windows. There is any way to extract lowest binding energy value from all log files rather than copying value by opening each file one by one?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have made a java software program for that. If you need send an email to jlabhelper@gmail.com
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I am beginner in molecular docking field. I have read a lot research papers and books but I wanted a suggestion about any material that could help me clarify ideas about the biophysical basis of molecular docking.
Many thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
i would like to learn drug design specially docking but i dont know how to start since i have no previous experience in this field as being a polymer chemist
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
6 answers
Good evening Ma/Sir, trust you all are in good health. I am interested in learning docking using Autodock and UCSF chimera. Please where can I get materials (videos) that can guide me especially in the area of active/binding site determination. Thank you.
Kind Regards
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
7 answers
I am trying to see whether there is an interaction between a specific virus protein and a natural compound (which will serve as my ligand), however I have no experience in molecular docking. I am aware that there are certain steps that need to be undertaken for me to get my protein and ligand both ready before I run molecular docking, but I am not sure where to start or how.
Some guidance would be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
How can I prepare a hydrophobic ligand for molecular docking? Is there any tool for hydrophobic ligands?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Which tools are best for prediction of binding pocket or active site of protein to perform molecular docking?
Thanks!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
9 answers
What are off-targets and how to perform off-target analysis in molecular docking ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
How can we select the best ligands among more than 60K compounds for a protein based on their binding affinities?
These compounds are from an antiviral library and I performed molecular docking using autodock vina.
Should I select by ranking them on the basis of high to low binding affinity and then taking the top 10 or 100 ligands from it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Collaboration possible
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
I am trying to dock a small ligand into a protein containing three Mg2+ ions that are essential for ligand binding using AutoDock Vina. However, when I prepared the receptor pdbqt file via the Autodock tool, the charge of Mg2+ was zero. Can you guide me on how to address this problem? Thank you so much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
I have done molecular docking for 70 pdb comprises 30 pdb with ligand and 40 pdb without ligand against 418 ligand compounds from Drugbank. So, for each pdb, there are 70 different results for each 70 pdb. So, how can I visualize the interaction for each pdb against 418 ligands automatically by using Biovia Discovery Studio without manual method? The criteria that I am looking for are the position of ligand inside the binding site and the 2D diagram interaction.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I am attempting to convert several .sdf ligands (2D) into .pdbqt files using the Open Babel program for molecular docking. I have followed the steps below:
  1. Add Hydrogens
  2. Generate 3D Structures
  3. Perform Energy Minimization
  4. Convert to Mol2 Format
  5. Convert to PDBQT Format
After completing these steps, I encountered a fragmented structure, as shown in the picture. What could be the reason for this output, and how can I rectify it? Please provide your suggestions. Thank you.
Comandline I used:
obabel -isdf *.sdf -h -osdf -O*.sdf --gen3d
obminimize -ff MMFF94 -sd -n 10000 *.sdf
obabel *.sdf -omol2 -m
obabel *.mol2 -opdbqt -m
I have not used script based method yet I have seen some people have the same problem with script as well.
Note: This problem is coming with 2D.sdf files not with the 3D.sdf files.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I was wondering if there is a procedure available for implementing and running an exhaustiveness setting of 24 in Autodock 4.
My goal is to conduct a comparative analysis between the pose results obtained from Autodock Vina and Autodock 4 while maintaining consistent control parameters, including exhaustiveness, for both programs. Is running exhaustiveness = 24 possible in Autodock 4 just like in Vina? If so, how does one go about it?
Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
Hi RG colleagues,
Wondering if there are any researchers with expertise in molecular docking who would be interested in a small collaborative project? I am interested in predicting if a small selection of natural products are active against specific nociceptive receptors (such as TRPV1), and investigating the features responsible for their activity. I am hoping that we could get a publication out of the project.
Kind regards,
Joel
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
I am Sai Pavithra doing research in Biotechnology related to herbal medicine. I did molecular docking using Autodoc Vina software. I am preparing for my viva voce. Kindly can anyone please tell me how should I present my molecular docking data for viva.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Dear All,
I downloaded ZINC000000001115 (Leukeran) in SDF 3D structure from Pubchem, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/2708#section=3D-Conformer (figure 1).
Then I converted the ZINC000000001115.sdf into bdbqt files, with the use of Openbabel and AutodockTools, then I got the ZINC000000001115.pdbqt and checked its structure with Discovery Studio 2020 (figure 2). However, ZINC000000001115.pdbqt looks like a broken structure. Is the ZINC000000001115.pdbqt file good for further molecular docking or there is a problem during conversion?
Looking forward to your opinions and solutions.
Thank you and best wishes,
Xiaohua
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Dear scientists, I need help with molecular docking with Autodock.
- When I upload the Protein or Ligand structure, the command "swig/python detected a memory leak of type 'BHtree *', no destructor found" appears on the screen (Picture 1).
- Then, I can't Run AutoGrid or AutoDock. When I press the Launch command (with files created), it only results in a window like this and sometimes nothing happens and The error log says "Sorry, I can't find or open Grid Parameter File "C:/Users/..." . I have everything in one folder already so it should find the files (Picture 2).
Can anyone tell me what have I done wrong and how to correct it? I tried a few times and it is still the same.
I look forward to receiving help from you.
Thanks very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
Dear Docker community,
I'm a beginner at using molecular docking, and I'm facing a problem when I want to open or drop a pdb file on Autodock tools. The folder is saved with the extension.pdb; however, it cannot be run on ADT because it generates an error message.
I don't know how I can deal with such a problem; I need your urgent help.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
8 answers
Molecular docking software/ websites?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
6 answers
HI All,
I'm performing energy minimization for all 31,000 ligands from the CMNP Database. The file I downloaded is a single SDF containing all the structures. I'm using the OpenBabel module in PyRx for the energy minimization, but the program keeps getting stuck and exits automatically before completing the task. When I try to rerun it, the process starts from the beginning and gets stuck again. Could you suggest a solution to this problem, or recommend an alternative method to complete the energy minimization?
I want to do energy minimization for all the ligand and save each as PDBQT.
I have attached a screenshot of the error I'm getting from PyRx.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
There is a Tool for minimization of multiple molecules.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
What softwares can I use and how do I start it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Use MultiDock Screening Tool
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Molecular docking Software or online application compatible with Mac OS Sonoma 14. Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Have you found any relevant tool/software? for mac sonoma?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
After performing the molecular docking of ligands containing chlorine atoms, the .pdb files of the complex of the conformers of interest and the respective receptor were generated from the .dlg.pdb output file using the Maestro program. When trying to visualize ligand-receptor interactions, Discovery Studio shows alkyl-type interactions with the chlorine atom.
Does anyone know how this error can be fixed?
Relevant answer
Answer
Open your AutoDock complex file then go to detail description of ligand click on chlorine atom then go to chemistry >element>chlorine. After that check interaction.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
8 answers
I've done molecular docking experiments with both AutoDock Vina and AutoDock. Now I'm interested in running molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the interactions between the docked ligands and their target proteins. Could you kindly suggest a suitable software for this task?
Relevant answer
Answer
Several free software packages are available for Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, each with different features and capabilities.
1. GROMACS
  • Platform: Linux, macOS, Windows
  • Description: GROMACS is one of the most widely used MD packages due to its high performance, especially for simulations of biomolecules. It is open-source and includes a wide range of tools for pre- and post-processing of simulation data.
  • Website: GROMACS
2. LAMMPS
  • Platform: Linux, macOS, Windows
  • Description: LAMMPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) is highly flexible and scalable, suitable for simulating a wide variety of materials and systems. It supports parallel computing and can handle large-scale systems.
  • Website: LAMMPS
3. NAMD
  • Platform: Linux, macOS, Windows
  • Description: NAMD is designed for high-performance simulations of large biomolecular systems. It is known for its efficiency in parallel computing environments and is often used in conjunction with the visualization tool VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics).
  • Website: NAMD
4. AMBER (AmberTools)
  • Platform: Linux, macOS
  • Description: AmberTools is a suite of programs for preparing input files, analyzing simulations, and performing various other tasks related to MD. It includes a free version of the sander module for small-scale MD simulations.
  • Website: AMBER
5. OpenMM
  • Platform: Linux, macOS, Windows
  • Description: OpenMM is a flexible library for MD simulations that can be used as a stand-alone application or as a library to add MD capabilities to other software. It’s particularly optimized for running on GPUs.
  • Website: OpenMM
6. HOOMD-blue
  • Platform: Linux, macOS, Windows
  • Description: HOOMD-blue is designed for executing particle-based simulations on GPUs. It is efficient for systems with complex interactions and is widely used in soft matter research.
  • Website: HOOMD-blue
7. CP2K
  • Platform: Linux, macOS
  • Description: CP2K is a program to perform molecular dynamics, quantum chemistry, and solid-state physics simulations. It is suitable for a wide range of simulations, including classical MD, ab-initio MD, and hybrid methods.
  • Website: CP2K
These tools cover a broad range of MD applications, from biomolecular simulations to materials science.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Good afternoon!
I am new to molecular docking. I have watched lessons on youtube, read forums, but still have questions about the algorithm of the work. I hope to find answers here. Sequence of work in AutoDock4: 1. protein preparation 2. ligand preparation 3. gridbox construction 4. map calculation 5. docking calculation 6. analysis In tutorial of molecular docking on known systems is considered. We know in advance where ligand binds to the protein. But what is the step-by-step algorithm of non-directed docking? And I have no prior knowledge. I think I need to create a gridbox as large as possible (126x126x126, 1 A). If the protein does not fit entirely in the gridbox, then move the center of the gridbox so as to capture the entire structure. That is, at the first step of molecular docking I will have several gridboxes created and calculated. Then I will gradually refine the gridbox values. For example, the next step will be for 126x126x126, 0.375 A maps. And so repeat until the map reaches a size, for example, 50x50x50 0.375A. And if my thoughts are correct, this is where my questions arise. 1. Should the maps overlap with each other in order to cover the whole space? 2. How should I decide which regions of my protein is less favorable? So I can further forget about them and focus only on the most favorable? I look forward to your answers and recommendations. Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
If you really want to do blind docking, I suggest quickvina-w that was specially tailored for this task.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
Dear researchers,
I am working both in silico and in vivo in my doctoral thesis. In my in silico studies, I do molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation and analyzes are performed on the protein. However, I am working on gene expression profiling in vivo. However, the gene I am working on is the gene of the protein I am working on in silico. My question to you is: Is it right to look at gene expression profiling in vivo? Or should I also study protein in the in vivo study? Are there any studies you can recommend on this subject?
Relevant answer
Answer
Merhabalar Fatma Kübra Hocam,
In certain instances, it may be more informative to examine protein levels in conjunction with gene expression profiles. This is because mRNA levels may not always align precisely with protein levels, potentially exhibiting discrepancies due to translational and post-translational regulations. If possible, it seems useful to conduct preliminary trials to identify possible differences and act according to the results. ,
Perhaps you can benefit from these two studies
Soru çok açıklayıcı olmamış tam olarak anlamadım ama mRNA seviyesini ölçerek protein ekspresyon seviyeleriyle korelasyon bakıyorsanız protein seviyelerine de bakmalısınız. Umarım yardımcı olur.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
For molecular docking of an organic compound with Bacillus megaterium which protein should choose?
Because the organic compund was tested its antimicrobial activity with "Bacillus megaterium" on Kirby-Buyer disc diffusion method.
When searching for the protein structure of "Bacillus megaterium" in RCSB PDB database, exactly it can't find "Bacillus megaterium " in this case which protein should take for molecular docking?
I have attached a screenshot of my search result of RCSB PDB website.
Relevant answer
Answer
maybe you can use this software to identify a probable target:
GitHub - BenderGroup/PIDGINv4: PIDGINv4
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I have conducted virtual screening using Schrödinger on a database of 17,000 molecules. Unfortunately, I cannot use the system with the Schrödinger license at the moment. I am trying to find a way to extract the binding energy from the PoseViewer .pv.maegz file generated by the screening on my local computer without using Schrödinger.
I attempted to convert the .maegz file to .sdf and then extract the binding energy, but this approach did not work. I would greatly appreciate any guidance or suggestions from those who have encountered and resolved a similar issue.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Nilanjana Mani , have you tried looking into the csv file that docking generates? It might have your energy values in tabulated format.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
Good day,
I am a student trying to work on Autodock for a project regarding Ligand-DNA interaction so i am quite new to molecular docking. i have followed tutorials and did all the steps recommended for the docking to work with PDBQT files for both the ligand and DNA, but every time i run AutoGrid the window for the process opens for less than 1 second and then shuts down immediately with no output file. i made sure the previous steps were working correctly and to open the ligand and DNA files in their respective input category and the paths for each part in the run window right before the launch have no spaces and are correct. Same problem happens with Autodock.
Does anyone know if there is a fix for this problem?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Uninstall all the docking related files..and also delete their source files from C drive..Then again download and install the software properly...I think the problem will be resolve
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
A molecule shows the -11.6 kcal/mol and second one -8.0 kcal/mol so why molecule (A) revealed higher binding score. Please explain major factor involve in it.
Relevant answer
Answer
Does it having no Hydrogen Bonds, too? If it's having no interactions, neither hydrogen bond nor any other interactions, then check the structure of your ligand. Is it in 2D form?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
6 answers
I am a beginner in molecular docking. And I want to know is the active pocket of the receptor the same for all ligands? Or will there be different active pockets for different ligand receptors? I want to do a hydrolase docking with a small carbohydrate molecule, I want to know exactly (or roughly) which part of the active pocket is in (I hope that the binding energy will be lower after docking), so how do I determine which range the active pocket of the receptor is in before docking? Looking forward to your response!
Relevant answer
Answer
Using PDBSum and CASTp
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
My ligand is a metal complex conatining Ag (Silver). So when i tried to run Molecular docking using Autodock vina as well as PyRx, it shows error as
"Parse error on line 15 in file "Methioninesilver.pdbqt": ATOM syntax incorrect: "Ag" is not a valid AutoDock type. Note that AutoDock atom types are case-sensitive."
Any necessary recommendation to overcome this error.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Suraj, you will have to the edit the 'atom_constants.h' file in the vina install directory (given that you have installed vina from source). You will have to add the parameters of Ag in 'atom_constants.h' .
Adding new atom type in atom_constant.h is tricky.
To make things easy, you can rename Ag in your ligand to any metal which is recognized by vina (say, Zn, Mg, Fe etc.). Then you can change the parameter values of these metals in atom_constant.h file with that of Ag. The docking should then work fine. This is quite like dummy-atom approach.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
7 answers
Need help regarding Molecular docking for publications, Authorship and due credit will be given. Looking for a purely non funded and academic collaboration, interested people can reach me.
Relevant answer
Answer
That seems pretty reasonable, will get back to you if possible. Thanks for the information
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
selected 3 compounds I identified from medicinal plant and did some insilico metabolic analysis using an online molecular docking software. This is what I generated.
The Beta sheet- is a Breast cancer type 1 protein molecule
The thick substances are my 3 compounds. Their binding affirnity score range are:
1st one is: -3.9
Second: -4.9
3rd: -4.1.
I can conclude this preliminary results can be a starting point of novel anticancer drugs. Minimal acceptable binding affinity score is -3.2.
Relevant answer
Answer
May I know how did you choose pdb and which pathway did you targeted and why?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I have to perform molecular docking on 2 ligands (A structure-absent in literature and B structure-sourced from PubChem) therefore, is energy minimisation necessary for both?
Relevant answer
Answer
use this app which automatically energy minimized the ligands while preparing https://sourceforge.net/projects/mzdock/
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
If a 3D protein is obtained with the inhibitor complex, its wild-type size may change completely. In this case, it seems correct to investigate the binding mode with the inhibitor molecule. If the protein to be investigated has only an inhibitor complex, what protein should I select in the PDB and in my activator molecule research, and what path should it follow?
Relevant answer
Answer
Nail Besli Yes you are absolutely correct about the change in conformation of the protein when bound to two different molecule types. However, if you have no structural information available for the conformation with the activator, but have the information for the inhibitor binding.
Molecular dynamics can be a good way to gain some insights of how these conformations change when your protein is unbound (WT), bound to inhibitor and bound to the activator.
This comparative analysis of the structural transitions on a free energy landscape may provide you with detailed conformational transitions that are playing roles. It might be external factors too like salt concentration, pH temperature and so on.
Further, you may use this information to validate your results experimentally and if the changes are adequate you can measure them using fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy experiments.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for some open source software for molecular docking with constraints based on distances or interactions. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use AutoDockTools for the same
Regards
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
When I run autogrid4 it says: autogrid4: ERROR: Unknown receptor type: "Se" -- Add parameters for it to the parameter library first!
How do i handle it? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Sorry my silly question, where should I add "atom_par Se 4.21 0.291 14.000 -0.00110 0.0 0.0 0 -1 -1 4 # Non H-bonding"?
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
Hi
I am practicing molecular docking using PyRx software. In articles, mostly Gaussian software is used to publish the molecular docking of any compound. Can be publish any molecular docking using PyRx (studying docking) and Discovery studio (studying ligand protein interaction, etc). Infect I am a beginner, and it is difficult to use Gaussian.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yeah absolutely! Gaussian is used for optimizations and theoretical chemical reactivity parameters. As per your concern, you can publish an article using Pyrx-based docking with valid explanations.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
I have a glycosylated protein and i want to dock it to another protein through the glycans not the amino acids. I have tried HADDOCK but the glycans were broken from each other and from the protein.
Are there specific webservers for docking of glycosylated protein to another protein through the glycan molecules?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use Zdock and ClusPro server as well to see if the results are useful.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
molecular docking, aptamer
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Hi all,
I am trying docking protein-protein interaction. Is it necessary that i should remove heteroatoms from the protein structure, since its making main bonds between the amino acids?pls let me know.
Its ending up with the results like non-resideus ACE, clean the structure and apply charmpolar force.
Relevant answer
Answer
It depends, if those het atoms are necessary for your proteins to interact, then nope, otherwise remove them. If these het atoms are part of crystallization process, you should remove them.
You need to prepare your system as well, make sure all atoms are present, geometry is optimized and protein is minimized. Pay attention to missing parts and secondary structure mismatch, just in case.
Once your proteins are ready, then go for docking.
Last point, avoid blind docking, search literature and see if binding residues are reported (if not for this protein, may be for homologous protein), and used them as starting point.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
What are some good journals to publish molecular docking studies with no article processing charges?
Thanks and Regards
Aaryan Gupta
Relevant answer
Dear Aaryan,
There are many journals that include docking studies as part of their aims and scope; however, some of them are certainly behind paywalls. Therefore, if you wish to find one without APCs, you must first eliminate some journals from these publishers, namely MDPI and Frontiers.
Some other journals, such as Elsevier, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley, may allow you to publish your paper without paying APCs. Here are a few examples:
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (Elsevier, ISSN: 1093-3263)
- Journal of Molecular Structure (Elsevier, ISSN: 0022-2860)
- Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics (Taylor & Francis, ISSN: 0739-1102)
- Molecular Simulation (Taylor & Francis, ISSN: 0892-7022)
- Journal of Molecular Recognition (Wiley, ISSN: 0952-3499)
However, bear in mind that nowadays, conducting docking studies alone is not usually sufficient for publication, especially in these prominent publishers. Unless you add further validation to your results, such as performing in vitro experiments or carrying out MD simulations, your manuscript will most likely be rejected. Therefore, I suggest you consider employing these approaches or look for another journal (preferably Q3-Q4) that might be able to publish your work in its current state.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
What are the steps to implement Dynamic Molecule with GROMACS using the results of molecular docking, and what programs are used?
Relevant answer
Answer
Please follow this link: GROMACS Tutorials (mdtutorials.com)
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Hello,
What are the methods for validating the outcomes derived from molecular docking along with their associated protocols?
Relevant answer
Answer
Experimental Validation:
  • Method: Experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, or other biophysical methods can be used to validate the predicted binding modes and affinities.
  • Protocol: Obtain experimental data for the same protein-ligand complex and compare it with the docking results.
Redocking Studies:
  • Method: Redocking involves re-docking a ligand into its binding site using the same parameters as in the initial docking.
  • Protocol: Compare the redocked conformation with the crystallographic or experimental structure of the complex. A good docking program should reproduce the experimental binding mode.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
I am doing molecular docking of the molecules that I synthesize and I am wondering how many poses would be necessary. I am doing this in maestro with glide and in the beginning by default I put 10 poses, but why not 50 poses. What would be the reason to get 50 poses instead of 10 or to get 100 poses instead of 50 ?
Relevant answer
Answer
It probably mainly depends on the surface area of your substrate and/or how many ligand binding sites there are. Hopefully, literature can help you with this information. Either way, I suppose the aim is to obtain as many ligand conformations for each bound pose. After a generating a certain number of docked poses, you might notice that the ligand conformations and their binding energies start to appear similar. In my opinion, this is where you stop generating more poses.
If I were you, I would read the literature first. If that does not provide me with sufficient information, I would take an approximate guess on the number of poses (preferably a high number) by looking at the surface area and electrostatics of the substrate and ligand, and also the time / resources required to perform this calculation.
All the best.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
I have designed 100 derivatives of indole and conducted molecular docking, MD simulation studies, ADMET analysis, and physicochemical analysis. Can this data be published as a research article? I would appreciate your suggestions on this matter.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dr. Punet Kumar , You can use network pharmacological analysis to get your target protein.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
I have docked some chemical probes into my enzyme of interest Using CB-Dock2 services. I get multiple cavities detected but i know the one i want to dock in so only select 1 cavity. then it produces a protein-ligand complex when docking is complete.
However it only shows me one possible pose for the docked ligand in each cavity. Is there a way to be able to view multiple binding modes/poses in the same cavity? I tried downloading the protein-ligand complex pub and the ligand mol2 file but cant seem to find where to see other options for the same cavity? I was told there were multiple options for each cavity and it is possible to view them but i am unsure.
Relevant answer
Answer
Few ligand docking software allows you to explore multiple poses for a given ligand in a specific binding site. While CB-Dock2 might not provide this feature directly, you can try other docking tools like AutoDock or GOLD, which allow for flexible ligand docking and can provide multiple poses.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
I am currently looking for any tools to analyze the probable docking sites intead of going for blind docking. Is there any bio-informatics tools or webserver that can help me further analyze the pockets present in my protein of interest and export the co-ordinates.
Relevant answer
Answer
Here are some popular tools you can consider:
  1. CASTp (Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins):Website: http://sts.bioe.uic.edu/castp/ CASTp is a web server that calculates and analyzes pockets on the protein surface. It provides information about the volume, area, and coordinates of the pockets.
  2. SiteMap:Website: https://www.schrodinger.com/sitemap SiteMap is a part of the Schrödinger Suite and is widely used for predicting binding sites on proteins. It analyzes the electrostatic and hydrophobic properties of the protein surface.
  3. PocketPicker:Website: https://www.pkoukos.gr/?page_id=15 PocketPicker is a standalone software for identifying ligand-binding sites on protein surfaces. It employs a geometric algorithm to identify potential binding pockets.
  4. DoGSiteScorer:Website: https://dogsite.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/ DoGSiteScorer predicts ligand-binding sites based on conservation, geometry, and hydrophobicity. It provides a score for each predicted site.
  5. Fpocket:Website: http://fpocket.sourceforge.net/ Fpocket is an open-source tool that identifies and characterizes binding pockets in proteins. It uses Voronoi tessellation and alpha spheres for pocket detection.
  6. MetaPocket:Website: http://projects.biotec.tu-dresden.de/metapocket/ MetaPocket is a meta server that combines the prediction results from multiple pocket prediction methods to improve accuracy.
It is important to carefully analyze the results from these tools and consider using multiple tools to cross-validate the predicted binding sites.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
What to do if ChimeraX software doesn't recognise the .chimerax file downloaded from SwissDock after docking?
Besides, the zip file of prediction done was empty.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
I had this issue - I used 7-zip to unpack teh folder instead and then it was fine
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hi, how can one achieve protein-protein interaction through molecular docking, in brief?
Should I prepare both my molecule and my receptor in advance of using the Cluspro server, or should I use the protein's PDB format directly?
With gratitude
My best wishes.
Relevant answer
Answer
To achieve protein-protein interaction through molecular docking, the following steps are involved:
1.Preparation: Prepare the protein structures to be docked by removing water molecules, adding any missing atoms, and optimizing the structures.
2.Selection of Docking Software: Choose appropriate molecular docking software or tools that utilize algorithms to predict the best possible binding conformations between the proteins.
3.Docking Algorithm: Apply the selected docking algorithm, often based on scoring functions and search algorithms. These algorithms explore the possible orientations of the proteins and evaluate their compatibility based on various criteria, such as shape complementarity, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding.
4.Binding Site Identification: Identify the binding sites or regions on the proteins where interaction is likely to occur. These sites can be determined through experimental data, protein structures, or predictive algorithms.
5.Docking Simulation: Run the docking simulation by allowing the proteins to move and explore different conformations to find the most energetically favorable or probable binding configuration.
6.Scoring and Analysis: Evaluate and score the generated docking poses to identify the most promising protein-protein interaction models. Higher scores typically indicate better binding affinity and stability.
7.Validation: Validate the predicted protein-protein interactions using experimental techniques like biochemical assays, mutagenesis studies, or structural analysis (e.g., X-ray crystallography, NMR) to confirm the accuracy of the predicted complexes.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I need a help regarding the molecular docking of a ligand which contains Ag or Fe as an atom, as I use Autodock vina and Autodock 1.5.7 and it doesn't contain their parameters. If someone knows the solution please can you explain me that.
Relevant answer
Answer
In autodock you have to change the parameter file and add the metal and its coordinate in parameter .dat file, I've attached below the parameter link for metals.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
7 answers
I have a 3D-structure of a protein, but it is an apoprotein. I am using Maestro for molecular docking. I want to find out the protein binding site in my protein.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have a similar question here. After generating the binding sites using sitemap and lets say l get 5 binding sites. From these 5 binding sites how do l know which one is the best site and select that one?!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
1 answer
Dear researchers
I want to ask about molecular docking in research. I have a complete research in which I isolated an enzyme. Any researcher can complete my research with theoretical calculations of the isolated enzyme against bacteria. I am waiting for the answer in order to complete the research. Greetings to all.
Relevant answer
Answer
I am virtual docking serine/ threonine kinase and bcl2 apaptosis at the momment it can be useful for you ?!
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
2 answers
Dear RG Community,
I am validating my docking protocol by re-docking the co-crystalized ligand into a defined pocket.
After docking, I am getting a pose which is flipped around its axis in 180 degree than that of the co-crystalized one.
Surprisingly, RMSD was also very less (below 1.2 Angstrom) between docked and the co-crystalized poses.
Could you please suggest possible reasons and the solution on it.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Vishal Zambre,
Make sure about your PDB and ligand preparation before Docking. Issues in ligand preparation, such as incorrect atom typing, atom order, or charges can lead to flipped poses. Also check symmetry and chirality, because in some cases, docking algorithms may produce inverted chiral centers. Ensure correct stereochemistry in both co-crystallized and docked poses.
Adjust flexibility, scoring, and search parameters for accurate poses and also avoid over-optimization to prevent false positives. If the binding pocket undergoes substantial conformational changes upon ligand binding, prefer flexible docking or induced fit docking approaches.
You can verify input coordinates and formats for both co-crystallized and docked structures. Additionally, try alternative docking software to assess if the issue persists, as different algorithms may yield varied results.
Conduct post-docking minimization or molecular dynamics simulation to refine docked poses and address inaccuracies introduced in the docking process.
Carefully examine these aspects to identify the cause of flipped poses and implement necessary corrective measures.
Thank You
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hello, I've recently started exploring molecular docking applications, and I'm still in the early stages. I'd like to ask Can I choose a ligand by giving the amino acid sequence and then do docking? Which applications would you suggest?
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello. In order to dock a protein whose 3D structure is not available on the uniprot site, you must model its 3D structure, for this there are many servers such as Itasser, Quark, and Robetta, and after evaluating and measuring your 3D structure, you can do the docking by Servers like Cluspro, Zdock or Hdock
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Hello, I've recently started exploring molecular docking applications, and I'm still in the early stages.I'd like to ask which proteins should be considered when examining the antimicrobial effects of certain molecules.
Is there a list of these proteins(that I should use as a docking protein), or are there general rules for proteins that should definitely be examined?
Also, can I perform docking not with a molecule but directly with an organism? If so, what should I look for to predict antimicrobial effects?
Could you please guide me on this?
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
it's important to consider specific proteins that play crucial roles in the survival and reproduction of microorganisms. Enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis: Proteins like penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are crucial for bacterial cell wall formation.
DNA gyrase and topoisomerases: Involved in DNA replication and repair, these are essential targets for antimicrobial compounds.
Ribosomal proteins: Targeting bacterial ribosomes can disrupt protein synthesis. Utilize databases like the Protein Data Bank (PDB) to find crystal structures of your selected proteins. Molecular docking predictions should be validated through in vitro and in vivo experiments.for in vitro evaluation you can use microorganisms directly.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I'm allowed to ask how to describe the results of molecular docking and interpret the results. then whether the results of molecular docking can determine the biological activity of a compound and how
Relevant answer
Answer
Approach to describing and interpreting the results of molecular docking:
1. Binding pose analysis: The docking software typically generates multiple binding poses, representing different orientations and conformations of the ligand within the binding site. Analyze the binding poses to identify the most favorable or energetically favorable pose based on scoring functions, such as binding affinity or energy.
2. Interaction analysis: Investigate the specific interactions between the ligand and the target protein. This involves examining hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and other non-covalent interactions. Identify key residues in the binding site that contribute significantly to ligand binding.
3. Binding affinity estimation: Docking programs often assign a scoring or energy value to each pose, which can be used to estimate the binding affinity. Lower energy or more negative scores generally indicate stronger binding. However, it's essential to interpret these scores cautiously and consider their limitations, as they may not always correlate perfectly with experimental binding affinities.
4. Validation and comparison: Validate the docking results by comparing them with experimental data, if available. This can involve comparing known ligand-protein complexes or experimental binding affinities. Assess the accuracy and reliability of the docking predictions based on their agreement with experimental findings.
Regarding determining the biological activity of a compound, it's important to note that molecular docking alone cannot definitively determine biological activity. However, it can provide valuable insights and hypotheses regarding potential ligand-target interactions. The docking results can guide further experimental studies, such as binding assays, biochemical assays, or in vivo experiments, to validate and confirm the predicted binding interactions and assess the compound's biological activity.
In summary, molecular docking results provide information about ligand binding modes, interaction patterns, and estimated binding affinities. While they can offer valuable insights into ligand-target interactions, experimental validation is required to confirm the biological activity of a compound. Molecular docking serves as a useful tool in the early stages of drug discovery and optimization, aiding in the design and selection of potential lead compounds for further development.
Hope it helps:credit AI
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
Modelling the results of receptor-based molecular docking or virtual screening methods by explicitly targeting the portion of the protein to which the activator binds indicates whether new candidate molecules will have an activator or inhibitor effect in binding to relevant residues. We know that “Competitive inhibitors disrupt the progress of the reaction by binding to an enzyme, usually at the active site, and preventing the actual substrate from binding.” Considering this, my question is, would the candidate molecules likely have an inhibitory effect?
Relevant answer
Answer
The situation you describe is distinct from a competitive inhibitor. It would be an allosteric inhibitor that competes with an allosteric activator, but is not itself an activator (like a receptor antagonist). These compounds would bind somewhere other than in the substrate binding site. Compounds that bind in the substrate binding site are almost always competitive inhibitors.
Alternatively, the inhibitor could compete with a co-substrate that is required for the reaction but is not converted into the product. An example would be with certain metal ions. A metal ion such as Mg2+, Zn2+ or Mn2+ might be involved in the reaction. This is often the case when the substrate is a nucleotide or nucleic acid, for example. Other metal ions, such as Cd2+ might act as inhibitors by displacing the normal metal ion but not making the appropriate interactions to act as the co-substrate. However, this is not a likely scenario when you screen so-called drug-like molecules, because they are much larger than metal ions. A more realistic possibility would be competition with a noncovalently bound organic cofactor.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Hello fellow researchers,
I am currently working on molecular docking using CB-Dock2, and I encountered an issue where I received a message stating "The chains of the uploaded protein are broken." As a result, the docking process was not completed. I would greatly appreciate your insights and suggestions on how to improve the structure of the protein to overcome this problem.
Thank you in advance for your valuable input!
Best regards,
Tahmineh
Relevant answer
Answer
Have you checked the protein structure and have you energy minimized it???
Is there any particular reason for using CB DOCK2 for initiating the docking protocol???
You can use AutoDockTools for the same which is an open source software.
Regards
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
4 answers
The molecular docking was performed by redocking the co-crystallized ligand and validating the protocol by finding the RMSD of the docked ligand by superimposing it on co-crystalized ligand. Afterwards the docking was performed on new set of ligand library. But can we justify the results of docking without doing md simulations? If yes, then please provide a reference from article.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is possible to present docking results without additional support from the results of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. However, increasingly, reviewers of manuscripts under consideration for publication in journals are requesting MD simulations to help bolster conclusions derived from docking results. It is, of course, also helpful (and often necessary) to have experimental results pertaining to the binding of ligands to macromolecular targets and to use docking and/or MD simulations to provide explanations for the observed experimental results.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
5 answers
I have done protein -protein docking using hdock server. however the interaction cannot be viewed using ligplot as shown in the attached photo. does anyone has the same experience? Thanks !
Relevant answer
Answer
To visualize a protein-protein docked complex in LigPlus, you need to first rename the chains of the proteins. As, initially, both chains are named 'Chain A', before visualization, you need to change the chain names. To rename the chains, PyMol can be used.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
I am working on a protein-ligand molecular docking techniques. And am stuck in the process of generating 2d as well as 3d protein-ligand interaction images. I tried using LigPlot and Pymol for 2d & 3d images respectively, but the results are not matching. So i also want to know whether it is human error by me or some software issues. The images are attached herewith for you to know the issue. Amino acid Met42 in 3d image is not correlating with amino acid Val35 in LigPlot. I tried generating the 3d interaction in PLIP webserver as well even there Met42 is having H-bond with protein.
So, is the LigPlot output is showing false results?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much Nor Farrah Wahidah Ridzwan & Mokhamad Fahmi Rizki Syaban had been confused for quiet a long time without knowing this. I will do the needful and try generating the interactions.
  • asked a question related to Molecular Docking
Question
3 answers
Schrödinger is one of the most prominent software for molecular docking. Is MOE also reliable for ligand docking.
regards,
Pratik
Relevant answer
Answer
MOE is also a very reliable software for protein-ligand docking, I've used it several times and I use Schrodinger too. So u can use it if you need an alternative to Schrodinger