Science topic
Mindfulness - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Mindfulness, and find Mindfulness experts.
Questions related to Mindfulness
Background Summary:
The relationship between science and spirituality has long been a subject of debate, often framed as a dichotomy—science grounded in empirical evidence and logical reasoning, and spirituality rooted in faith, intuition, and transcendence. Historically, the two have been seen as separate, with science focusing on the material world and spirituality addressing the metaphysical. However, recent advancements in various fields of science, particularly quantum physics, neuroscience, and cosmology, have begun to blur the lines between these traditionally distinct realms.
As science continues to uncover the mysteries of consciousness, the nature of reality, and the origins of the universe, new questions arise: Can spirituality, which encompasses the search for meaning and the experience of the divine, be reconciled with scientific inquiry? Can modern science, in its pursuit of understanding the fundamental laws of nature, leave room for concepts such as God, purpose, and interconnectedness?
Furthermore, many contemporary thinkers and scientists argue that spirituality could be incorporated into modern scientific frameworks. Practices like meditation, mindfulness, and consciousness studies have already demonstrated measurable impacts on human health and cognition. The exploration of how spiritual experiences can be understood and validated within scientific paradigms opens exciting opportunities for interdisciplinary research.
I would like to know the difference between Meditation and Mindfulness.
ABSTRACT
The study explored the relationship between mindfulness levels and academic performance among
prospective teachers in the subject of Technical Writing and Presentation Skills at the university
level. The population comprised morning and evening semester prospective teachers from a selected university. Using convenient sampling, an intact group of 80 students (42 from the morning session and 38 from the evening session) was selected, representing diverse academic backgrounds and including both genders for comprehensive analysis. Mindfulness levels were assessed using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), which evaluated Observing, Describing, and Acting with
Awareness, Non-Judging of Inner Experience, and Non-Reactivity to Inner Experience. Academic
performance was measured by the Grade Point Average (GPA) system. The study revealed considerable mindfulness levels across the five facets, with no significant gender differences, and a significant positive correlation between mindfulness and academic achievement. This study's results
underscore the significant outcome of mindfulness interventions in improving academic portfolios.
The results further recommend that incorporating mindfulness activities/practices within an
educational setting will enhance cognitive development and academic achievement.
Keywords: Mindfulness levels, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Prospective
teachers, Grade Point Average, Academic performance
One of my scholars is about to complete a thesis on mindfulness, resilience, and wellbeing. This university requires thesis examiners from different parts of the globe. Should be an associate professor or above. Kindly send me details through a message and (your mail id, and contact number) I will communicate the invitation. Thank you and regards
We are gathering the research on Inner Development Goals! If you have published - let us know, let's create an open access list of publications together?
Please add it here, if your published paper contains IDGs in the Title, Abstract and Keywords.
As per topics:
Sustainability and Climate Change
Well-being and Social Frameworks
Education and Pedagogy
Leadership and Transformation
As per IDG Dimensions:
I want to seek input on the idea of mindfulness as a moderator or a mediator.
Trait mindfulness if it exists is a trait and so is innate for the most part. It exists prior to an individual's experiences later in life. As such it should be considered a moderator that exists a priori. The idea of trait mindfulness as a mediator just doesn't seem correct. An IV causes the mediator which, in turn, causes the DV. How can something like a traumatic event cause trait mindfulness? I am thinking of the theoretical approach I am going to take in an upcoming analysis. I believe that I am going to argue trait mindfulness is a moderator. Any ideas or discussion on trait mindfulness as a mediator or moderator is welcome. I use the FFMQ to measure mindfulness.
I am currently working on a service evaluation proposal as part of a new psychology groups pathway in a perinatal psychology service. The groups pathway involves patients attending a number of different groups depending on their psychological needs. These groups include topics such as mindfulness, intrusive thoughts, low mood, anxiety etc. We are unaware of this type of pathway ever being used in a perinatal service before, so we are new to this particular type of service evaluation.
We are currently unsure as to whether MANOVA or T Tests would be more suitable for this evaluation. Usually we would use MANOVA to evaluate groups within the service, however we are not sure that it will be appropriate for this new pathway for the following reasons: not all patients will complete all groups; patients will be completing different measures, which do not correlate, depending on group attendance (for example one may complete PCL-5 and one may complete OCI); patients will be completing a different number of groups in addition to different combinations.
We considered multiple t tests to account for each group, but this also doesn't really evaluate the pathway as a whole, only the effectiveness of the individual groups.
Please let me know what you would choose for this particular study! Happy to provide more information if required.
#Stress management
#Academics Performance
Here is how I would update Mindfulness in the theory of the Liquid (Holobiont) Learner:
Zhuangzi's philosophy, rooted in Daoism, offers a unique perspective on the mind and consciousness that differs from Cartesian thinking. While Cartesian dualism posits a separation between mind and body, Zhuangzi's ideas suggest a more integrated and fluid understanding. To update mindfulness from Zhuangzi's point of view, consider the following concepts:
1. Flowing with Dao:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi emphasizes flowing with the Dao, the natural way of things, rather than imposing a rigid structure on experience.
- Mindfulness Update: Instead of a static focus on the mind, encourage individuals to cultivate a state of flowing mindfulness. This involves being attuned to the present moment, allowing thoughts and sensations to flow naturally, and aligning with the spontaneous rhythm of the Dao.
2. No Fixed Center:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi challenges the notion of a fixed self or center. He uses the metaphor of the "pivot" to suggest that there is no permanent center.
- Mindfulness Update: Shift the focus from a fixed center of awareness to a dynamic, ever-changing awareness. Mindfulness, in this sense, becomes an exploration of the fluid nature of consciousness without clinging to a fixed point of reference.
3. Harmony with the Whole:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi's philosophy advocates for living in harmony with the entire cosmos.
- Mindfulness Update: Expand the scope of mindfulness to include not only individual thoughts and sensations but also the interconnectedness with the external world. Mindfulness becomes a practice of aligning one's with the larger flow of existence.
4. Spontaneous Naturalness:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi values spontaneous naturalness and criticizes artificial efforts to control or manipulate reality.
- Mindfulness Update: Encourage a mindfulness practice that embraces the natural spontaneity of thoughts and experiences. Rather than trying to control the mind, individuals learn to observe and accept the ebb and flow of thoughts without judgment.
5. Embracing Transformation:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi emphasizes the inevitability of change and transformation.
- Mindfulness Update: Shift mindfulness from a static state to a process of constant transformation. Mindfulness involves embracing the ever-changing nature of thoughts, feelings, and experiences without resistance.
6. Non-Attachment to States:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi discourages attachment to particular states or experiences.
- Mindfulness Update: Instead of seeking a particular state of mindfulness, encourage a non-attached awareness. Mindfulness becomes a state of being open to whatever arises in the present moment without fixating on achieving a specific mental state.
7. Dynamic Stillness:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi speaks of a dynamic stillness, where one can find tranquility even in the midst of activity.
- Mindfulness Update: Redefine stillness as a dynamic state within mindfulness. Even in the midst of the mind's activities, individuals can find a tranquil center by cultivating an awareness that is not disturbed by external or internal fluctuations.
8. Egoless Awareness:
- Zhuangzi's Influence: Zhuangzi challenges the ego-centric view of the self.
- Mindfulness Update: Shift mindfulness from an ego-centric awareness to an egoless awareness. Mindfulness involves observing thoughts without reinforcing a strong sense of a separate and enduring self.
Updating mindfulness from Zhuangzi's point of view involves moving away from a Cartesian dualistic perspective and embracing a more integrated, flowing, and dynamic understanding of consciousness. It encourages individuals to cultivate a mindfulness practice that aligns with the spontaneous nature of the Dao and the interconnected web of existence.
Mindfulness based interventions in neurodevelopment disorders
with data sets and
tables
As educator i´m wondering if is it possible to improve students and teacher´s well being practising regularly mindfulness.
I am looking to conduct a study to address whether mindfulness has an effect on stroop inteference and spatial frames of reference. Therefore, I will conduct 2- two way Anova's. This will be 2(Mindfulness, Control) x 2(Pre, Post) Mixed anova as the groups are between subject but the measures will be repeated. How could I analyse this if parametric assumptions are not met?
The research question explores the effects of a mindfulness and compassion practice intervention on individuals' well-being and social relationships over an extended period. It aims to understand the long-term impact of mindfulness and compassion practices on various aspects of individuals' lives. The question investigates explicitly how these practices influence participants' overall well-being, including their mental, emotional, and physical health and their relationships with others.
The research question also seeks to uncover the underlying mechanisms contributing to the observed effects. This involves exploring the psychological, physiological, and behavioural processes involved in the changes experienced by individuals who regularly engage in mindfulness and compassion practices. These mechanisms could include changes in emotional regulation, increased self-awareness, enhanced empathy and compassion towards others, reduced stress levels, and improved social skills.
A long-term study with a well-designed intervention and control group would be necessary to answer this research question. Participants would be engaged in a structured mindfulness and compassion practice program for an extended period, while another group would serve as a control, receiving no intervention. Data would be collected periodically to assess changes in well-being and social relationships, and researchers would conduct statistical analyses to determine the significance of any observed effects.
The research can contribute valuable insights into psychology, health, and well-being by understanding the long-term impact and underlying mechanisms of mindfulness and compassion practices. It can inform the development of more effective interventions to enhance individuals' overall quality of life and promote positive social connections. Additionally, the findings may have implications for various settings, including healthcare, education, and community-based programs, where mindfulness and compassion practices are increasingly being integrated to improve the lives of individuals and communities.
What is the appropriate way to report the relationships among three interrelated variables in an observational study using GLM or mediation models?
Variables: Depression, Neuroticism, Mindfulness
Regression models - All of the relationships are statistically significant and passed assumption checks.
Mindfulness predicts Depression: R2 = .247, unstandardized coefficient = -5.32
Mindfulness predicts Neuroticism: R2 = .503, unstandardized coefficient = -3.88
Neuroticism predicts Depression: R2 = .732, unstandardized coefficient = 1.02
Should I simply report all findings, starting with the "strongest" relationship, Neuroticism predicts Depression?
Multiple Regression models - All of the relationships are statistically significant and passed assumption checks. Is there a benefit to reporting these model results beyond what is gained from the above regression models?
Mediation models - All of the relationships are statistically significant. All Sobel test results are statistically significant.
See attached file with results of mediation models and Sobel tests. Would I report all models or only that Neuroticism mediates the role of Mindfulness on reducing Depression, and Depression mediates the role of Mindfulness on reducing Neuroticism?
In my first hypothesis, I calculated a mixed anova with repeated measures to find out whether perceived stress (recorded at t1, t2, t3) is reduced after participation in a mindfulness intervention compared to a control group over the course of the three time points. The effect was not significant. Now I would like to test in my second hypothesis whether the reduction of the perceived stress score is moderated by the mindfulness score (recorded at t1, t2, t3) over the course of the three measurement points. Can I test the hypothesis even if I actually know that the reduction (tested in hypothesis 1) is not significant?
And if so, how can I proceed?
I have been looking for days to no avail! Looking for a 1-item assessment for the measurement of mindfulness (as in mindfulness mediation).
We are two third year bachelor of psychology students looking into using PsychoPy for a continuous performance task. (CPT)
Our project is about the interactions between boredom proneness and sustained attention in the context of mindfulness meditation.
If you have any references or tips for us, we would gratefully take in account your advices.
I want to measure the effect of a kind of mindfulness training on stress. For this purpose, I want to create stressful conditions for the participants in the pre-test and post-test by using VR and measuring their stress before and after the mindfulness exercises by measuring their body temperature and heart rate. For such research, what kind of video or task should I show the participants on the VR device, and for how long?
The direct relationship between wellbeing and social media addiction is -. 33 (p=.0026)
The indirect relationship between these two via mindfulness is -.28 (Lower CI-Higher CI were both negative).
What does this mean?
Hey there,
I have collected data to answer the question “Does Neuroticism Mediate the effect of a Mindfulness Intervention?” I Have collected pre-intervention Mindfulness Score and a post intervention measure (both scale). I also took a neuroticism score before the intervention to estimate the level of trait neuroticism (also scale). There was no control group.
So far I have managed to demonstrate with a paired-samples t-test that there is a significant difference between pre and post-mindfulness scores, I have used Pearson correlation to show that mindfulness and neuroticism are negatively correlated at baseline (both of these are a replication of the existing findings).
For the mediator part, I intended initially to use the model from another study which divided the neuroticism score into low, low/medium, medium high and high as a quasi-independent variable. However, the scores in my data were too clustered together without much of a range in the group (there was a high attrition rate ~45%) so these 4 groups are not possible. I have tried running a repeated measures ANOVA, where I dichotomize neuroticism into low/high, which I know is not the best idea as I will artificially restrict the variance in my data. This does however produce quite a sensible looking plot and desirable output for my study but I know it's not sound practice.
I have also tried doing what I think is a repeated measures ANCOVA, with time at 2 levels as a within subjects factor (pre and post-intervention score) and neuroticism as a covariate but I have nothing to put into the between subjects factor so I’m not sure if it’s accurate. It is giving neuroticism a value of 3.45 in the model but I have no idea what that number means or how to interpret it. It also produces a sensible looking plot showing the increase in mindfulness pre to post-intervention. I have also tried is computing a mindfulness score difference and correlating that with the level of mindfulness which also gives me a medium size positive correlation <0.05.
Any help would be greatly appreciated as I am really desperate!
I am doing research exploring the relationship between mindfulness and burnout, with a mediator of physical activity. Is ANCOVA the most appropriate method for data analysis?
IV: mindfulness (numeric variable); mediator: physical activity (categorical variable); DV: burnout (numeric variable/ categorical).
Hi, I'm not sure if it is suitable to use One Way Repeated Measure ANOVA for my research. My research's purpose is to see if online mindfulness intervention is effective in improving subjective well-being (SWB) and quality of life (QOL) of university staff. The situation here is, I have collected data through questionnaire at 4-time points (T1, T2, T3, T4). After T4, only 31 (n=31) subjects remained with the study. The questionnaire contains items about mindfulness, SWB, and QOL. Meanwhile, the subjects were receiving treatments through online mindfulness intervention. So, I want to analyze if the intervention is really effective by comparing their mindfulness, SWB, and QOL scores at T2, T3, and T4 with the score at T1.
Our paper is about adaptations of practices from the East in the West, including yoga, mindfulness and other forms of meditation. We are looking for references that support that practices are compromised when not applied in full. This could be because of people or organisations 'cherry-picking' what suits them while ignoring the philosophy in which they are embedded, or other examples that have been soundly explored, or a related theory.
Thanks in advance, scholars!
Hi,
Does anybody know of a self-report measure indexing the "runner's high" phenomenon (outside of flow scales)?
The term “runner’s high” (RH) is commonly used to describe the feeling of euphoria experienced by athletes engaged in endurance running. This state is usually characterized by (decreased) anxiety, relaxation, analgesia, euphoria, effortless running experience, and a “lost sense of time”.
Thanks!
Damien
Good Morning,
i am writing my master thesis about the work strains in german hospitals and the role of mindfulness as a moderator in the work strain- stress relationship.
Therefore I use process. In the HLR I controlled for the influence of Covid-19 for their working conditions, but the beta wasn't significant.
Now I am wondering if I should implement this control Variable in the moderation analysis as well? I guess one disadvantage would be one more predictor which could reduce the power?
What would you do?
Kind regards,
Nora
I request interviews with professors and researchers on the following components
Reflective thinking
Border discourse
Mindfulness
mushfake
Help me thank you
Hello.
I am trying to find out efficacy of cognitive remediation intervention in patients of depression and schizophrenia. Can you please help me in finding out what will be the appropriate sample size for my study.
Regards
Sarah Javed.
This is my first attempt at a meta-analysis. Advice would be much appreciated!
I am looking at the effects of a specific mindfulness intervention on emotion regulation looking at the DERS questionnaire as the measure of emotion regulation.
I am analysing both the subscales scores and total scores.
I have 5 out of 10 papers that have provided the pre and post means and SDs for the subscale scores and 8/10 papers who have provided the pre and post means and SDs for the total scores.
How would I go about analysing this data? 3 studies have more than one mindfulness intervention condition and one has no control group but multiple mindfulness intervention conditions.
HI everyone,
I would be interested in getting in touch with professionals who are working with adults and have used Emotional Intelligence activities, Social and Emotional Learning activities and Mindfulness tasks.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Carmen
Hello everybody,
I am looking for a scale measuring dependence on your supervisor to reach your target (e.g., reaching a good grade in your dissertation).
I already found the perceived power scale by Hinkin and Schriesheim (1989), but this doesn't really fit to what I am looking for.
I am really thankful for any advice given.
Best wishes,
Paul
Mindfulness is included in 3º therapy generations, but maybe the Principal MBI instructors (or MBSR, MBCT) are using a cognitive model.
Hello together,
I am searching for a cut-off of the FFMQ (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire).
I have read a few papers and it still puzzles me how a threshold for being mindful (or not) is derived.
Thank you!
Dilek
Being resilient in life, our work, and what we do has always believed to foster organisational success. There can be physical resilience, emotional resilience/psychological resilient.
Is being physically and psychologically resilient healthy for our well-being?
Are there limits to being resilient? How much is too much of being resilient and how does this affect our well-being?
Good morning everyone, I'm looking for documents that explain the use of OLBI instrument for burnout. Specifically how your results are interpreted.
Thank you very much!
Huge and vague inquiry from a non-professional active in mental health social work: I have read that there is not much evidence for the value of "I-messages." This leads me to ask about a lot of things I use:
-mindfulness in trauma reactions-
-reflective listening/validation-response
-challenging questions to people [in therapy, although I am not a therapist]
-I-statements/I messages
-Broken-record technique to avoid arguments
-Application of motivational interviewing to misinformation, e.g. "I don't want to have therapy because only crazy people need therapy."
-very simple screening questions
-scaling questions
-miracle questions
Il Seminario SSIP è un think tank autonomo e indipendente istituito a gennaio 2020 sull'esperienza di un precedente istituto di studi e ricerche denominato "Istituto europeo per le Nuove Professioni". Il Seminario SSIP ha le seguenti finalità (come da Statuto):
a) sostenere e promuovere ogni azione di ricerca, studi, alta formazione, anche attraverso la piattaforma e-learning,intesi alla sviluppo della coscienza internazionale ed europea, in particolare la trasmissione dei valori comuni dell’Organizzazione delle Nazioni Unite (ONU), dell’Unione europea (UE), della partecipazione democratica e civica, dei diritti di cittadinanza italiana ed europea, della libera circolazione, della mobilità giovanile e del turismo; nel settore della comunicazione, privata e pubblica, favorire lo scambio di best practice tra addetti ai lavori della comunicazione istituzionale; delle nuove professioni emergenti a livello internazionale e dell’Unione europea;
b) aderire a progetti pubblici e privati finalizzati alla comprensione tra i Popoli con l’obiettivo di contribuire a raggiungere un livello di conoscenza quantomeno minimo di istruzione e di formazione; contribuire al benessere della persona attraverso un’ambiente più salubre e ecologico, attraverso la cultura, il progresso umano, economico, ambientale e sociale,ilrispetto della dignità umana, della libertà, della democrazia, dell'uguaglianza, dello stato di diritto e del rispetto dei diritti delle persone appartenenti a minoranze in una società fondata sul pluralismo, sulla non discriminazione, sulla tolleranza, sulla giustizia, sulla solidarietà, sulla parità tra donne e uomini e sul pluralismo religiosoin particolare nello spazio euro-mediterraneo;
c)affermare eincoraggiare nei giovani laureati la conoscenza del multilateralismo e delle organizzazioni internazionali, governative e non governative, nella prospettiva della carriera diplomatica, delle carriere internazionali e dei concorsi nelle organizzazioni internazionali e in particolare nell’Unione europea;
d) partecipare a progetti pubblici e privati relativi al mercato digitale per accrescere la competitività digitale ed economica di enti, imprese e persone nonchè la coesione digitale in tutta l'Unione europea e nella prospettiva mondo, in particolare nelle zone più svantaggiate e in ritardo di sviluppo;
e) aderire a progetti interculturali e realizzare scambi internazionali, gemellaggi, azioni concrete di volontariato internazionale finanziati da enti pubblici e privati, nazionali ed internazionali incluse le tematiche dell’immigrazione e dell’integrazione;
f)predisporre studi e ricerche, convegni, seminari, simposi di studio, corsi di formazione e/o aggiornamento professionale e dei docenti della scuola, intesi a favorire la consapevolezza delle problematiche e delle dinamiche internazionali, europee, della geopolitica e del fenomeno della globalizzazione.
Hello everyone,
I've got a question regarding deciding whether the short vs full questionnaire is better at predicting or showing an association with a variable of interest. I've used the full and the short form of the Five Facets of Mindfulness (FFMQ) to look into its association with various variables of interest (ranging from ordinal to continuous). I get not only different magnitudes of associations (e.g., rho = .3 vs rho = .5) but I also get different number of significant factors (there are five factors in the FFMQ) depending on whether the short of the full version of the questionnaire was used. This suggests that the addition or removal of some of the questions in having quite a significant difference. What tests would you propose I use to get to the bottom of this? Is there a test that can tell me with some assurance whether the short or the full FFMQ is more appropriate?
P.S To complicate things further, the full FFMQ questionnaire has around 500 participants while the short form has around 1000.
Regards,
Achilleas
I have conducted an experimental design on exploring the effectiveness of mindfulness skills on students' psychological wellbeing. I aim to test if there is a significant change on students' levels of depression ,anxiety, emotion regualtion and mindfulness skills, depending on the intervention they have received.
The control group received no intervention and the intervention group trained and practiced mindfulness for 21 days. I test my sample twice, pre-intervention (to get a baseline) and post intervention (one group have received the intervention whereas other group is not received but tested).
In this case, I am confused if I need to use time as independent variable or not. Which ANOVA would work best ?
MAny thanks in advance.
Hello,
I am looking for a mindful parenting scale to use with a cohort of parents (predominately mothers) who have personality disorder related difficulties, with a preference for measures with less than 20 items.
I have thought about using the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting (IEM-P) scale (10 items) and would appreciate hearing anyones experiences with using this scale, or suggestions for an alternative.
Thank you,
Kayla
Hello there!
Have you ever wondered if you’re making the right decisions? Or, if your choices reflect who you are and what you want from life?
Well, help me find it out.
If interested, you need to fill in this survey: https://lnkd.in/gAT44GK It’s quite intense as it unravels a quite complicated matter. Still, your participation is not only going to help me but the entire scientific community willing to understand how we can be our better versions.
For your attention, thank you! And, for your participation, double thank you! - Don’t forget to share this survey with your family and friends. With more people involved, better to predict correlations!
Happy Holidays!
Kindest Regards,
Ingrid de Moraes
Hi Everyone,
I am an MSc student at The University of Edinburgh. My team and I are in the process of designing an observational study in which participants psychological well-being will be measured pre and post a tree planting activity in the Scottish Borders. We are interested in using the State Mindfulness Scale.
Has anyone worked with this?
Thanks
Richard
For my undergraduate research project, my experimental group is watching a mindfulness meditation video (15 minutes) to relax them. I want a control group to watch a video as well, but one that isn't too exciting or relaxing, but neutral. Any suggestions?
Let's have a starter discussion about this topic and see which areas people are most interested in.
I am considering a hypo-egoic mindset (e.g. Leary & Terry, 2012) to mediate the effects of mindfulness meditation on a cognitive outcome. Simply using a mindfulness scale seems insufficient to me, because a hypo-egoic mindset captures more than any existing conceptualization of mindfulness.
The conceptually most near scale that I´ve found is the Quiet Ego Scale (Wayment, Bauer & Sylaska, 2015), but it doesn´t really fit my purpose for several reasons. Particularly, the growth subscale is contrary to the present-focused quality of a hypo-egoic mindset.
I would be very grateful, if you have any suggestions :)
I am currently recruiting for research study participants for my dissertation. The topic is "The experience of practicing mindfulness meditation among African American female doctoral students.
Terry Badey-McClelland
Since I am a leadership student, i had looked at
1. Implementation and its impact on experienced teachers.
2. Mindfulness for leaders and teachers
Could you help me to frame my research question? Any suggestions and critiques on both the topics are also welcome.
There are some studies on effectiveness of mindfulness for improving sleep.
Hi, I have a very basic question, so I'm sorry for wasting your time. I conducted a 2-way IM ANOVA on the moderating effects of ethnicity (as a dichotomous variable - we are very limited in what variables we had data for) on the relationship of mindfulness and identity exploration in emerging adults. I was very surprised to receive a non-significant result for all my analyses, particularly given the established relationship between mindfulness and identity exploration, but I can't work out why. Could someone point me in the right direction to obtain answers, please? I did have very unequal group sizes, which I couldn't correct, based on the limitations set by the assessment.
I've been testing a mindfulness scale consisting of 6 variables. (n=375). I tried all factor retention and extraction methods and their combinations with promin rotation. BIC suggests 2 dimensions, while all others (PA, MAP, HULL) suggest 1. However, when I run the EFA for 1 and 2 factors the two factor solutions always result in a better fit (RMSEA) and the cumulative proportion of variance based on eigen values is over 75% whereas for the 1 factor models it is always under 55%. The inter-factor correlation in the 2 factor model is 0.62. Factor loadings in the one factor model are between 0.6-0.7 while in the 2 factor model 0.7-0.8 . So, should I believe the factor retention methods or the EFA results to choose between the 1 and 2 factor model? I am using FACTOR software by Lorenzo Seva.
I'm writing a protocol to assess the influence of MBSR (8-week) on patients diagnosed w/chronic illness. I'd like to assess pre- and post mindfulness trait.
Lot of research has been done by psychologists as well as medical personnel but there is thin body of research on impact of mindfulness on work related outcomes. Let's us delve upon the importance of being mindful at workplace
My personal experience has been positive with a mindfulness based application on my cell phone. I was wondering if there is availability, or rather potential to develop such applications in more languages to cater to larger population of people.
I'm looking for a suitable protocol in mindfulness-based biofeedback for athletes anxiety and stress management.
I would really appreciate a copy of the FMI-13/14 in the Japanese language version. I would like to continue my mindfulness research using a Japanese speaking population for my next study. Any and all assistance obtaining this is greatly appreciated. I’ve read studies that used it; but, I cannot seem to find a copy of it.
Hello Deep Thinkers,
Would like to invite you to become involved in a discussion related to my research on wage-earners/blue-collar workers and their avoidance of Mind-Body Practices (i.e., yoga and meditation) to manage stress. More specifically, why are wage-earners so under-engaged in meditation and/or yoga for stress relief in or out of the workplace, in-spite of re-enforcing positive health literature on Mind-Body Interventions?
Thank you in advance for your time and attention,
MC Palasi
Hi everyone,
I have conducted a research and have some data of mindfulness scale, it's reliable and valid. Lower total score means people are more mindful, and I want to see its relationship on people's choice on employee choice for a company. Which analysis should I use? Any help will be appreciated!
Hin
I don't seem to find any further details on the project. I'm quite curious about the project as I've been practicing regular (1-2 hours / day) meditation for many years and have find it immensely helpful in personal, professional and social life. So I would be very interested to know bit more about the project. Many thanks.
Asta
Hello,
I am writing my thesis on the effects of mindfulness meditation on reading in dyslexic children and I am looking for research on how reading works in the brain (what areas of the brain are activated, what mechanisms are involved...) that I would like to relate to the areas of the brain that are activated during meditation.
I know that now, thanks to neuroimaging, we have more accurate data but I can't find any solid documents on it.
Thank you for reading my message and I hope to find answers here.
Good continuation in your work and research.
Sandrine BRASSE
Bonjour,
Je fais mon mémoire sur les effets de la méditation de pleine conscience sur la lecture des enfants dyslexiques et je cherche des recherches sur le fonctionnement de la lecture dans le cerveau (quelles zones du cerveau sont activées, quels mécanismes sont mis en jeu ...) que j'aimerais mettre en relation avec les zones du cerveau qui sont activées pendant la méditation.
je sais que maintenant, grâce à la neuro imagerie, nous avons des données plus précises mais je ne trouvent pas de documents solides là dessus.
Merci d'avoir lu mon message et j'espère trouver ici des réponses.
Bonne continuation dans vos travaux et vos recherches.
Sandrine BRASSE
Does anyone know of research comparing smaller vs longer doses of mindfulness training effects? In many populations (e.g., surgeons, parents with children, etc.) attending a weekly 2.5 hour MBSR class for 8 or 9 weeks is not feasible. What about more shorter duration classes?
I'd like to complete a meta-analysis of studies and/or data relating to the effectiveness of mindfulness in reducing suicidal thoughts for those at risk.
I am curious about the relationship between mindfulness and motivation. Is there research specifically addressing this?
The first question indicates towards experience of an individual as an employee and his/her interactions with a peer, senior, boss, or the organization (norms/rules/regulations) itself.
The second question indicates to share various factors that contribute building the perception of employees.
Do you know any intervention program that performs aerobic exercise with teachers to improve their wellbeing or similar variables related to your health (stress, anxiety, burnout, depresion?
There are numerous intervention programs that use techniques like yoga or mindfulness but I have not found one that is based on aerobic exercise.
I am conducting research on the subject and I would like to document myself. Thank you.
1. Intra-personal level (or individual level)
2. Inter-personal level (e.g., peer level, subordinate level, boss/supervisor level, and organization level)
Dear Daniel and Philipp, I would appreciate a bit more information about this project. I wrote my Phd about Mindfulness for injuries prevention and treatment. My e-mail is silviasole@dif.udl.cat
Thank you, best regards!
Silvia
I would like to expand on research by Chang, Kuo, Huang and Lin (2018), who used the AX version of the continuous performance test to assess the effect of mindfulness training on participants' abilities to shift between reactive (bottom-up stimulus-driven processes) and proactive (top-down goal oriented processes) modes of cognition.
However, I don't think the CPT provides a good assessment of how the modes are shifted in day-to-day life. To clarify, it doesn't take into account the role of context in influencing which mode is most likely to be dominant at a particular time.
Thus, I would like to assess these dual modes of cognition in a way that takes into account the influential role of situational demands in governing how people switch between both modes.
I need a research paper/theory related to fear of flying anxiety (aviophobia) and mindfulness. Can anyone guide me?
In this study there are two groups (experimental and control group). The experimental group did a mindfulness intervention and both groups completed 3 different mindfulness questionnaires (each with sub scales) pre and post intervention. After the intervention (and treatment as usual for the control group) both groups were assessed on three different questionnaires that assess risk of violence.
So, I have four IVs (group and pre-test mindfulness scores on three different questionnaires) and six (!) DVs (post-test mindfulness scores on three different questionnaires and post-test risk of violence scores on three different questionnaires). One of the risk of violence questionnaire scores is categorical data; all other variables are continuous. Age is a control variable.
I want to find out:
a) if the mindfulness intervention significantly increased mindfulness versus treatment as usual
b) if risk of violence was significantly lower in the experimental versus control group
c) if a) and b) are true then is the reduced risk of violence in the experimental group due to increased mindfulness.
Is the best way to analyse this with three separate analyses e.g.
a) Repeated-measures ANCOVA with group & all 3 mindfulness pre-test scores as IVs and post-mindfulness scores as DVs?
b) One-way MANCOVA with with group as the IV and the risk of violence scores as DVs?
c) Not sure what comes next??
If you read to the end and can advise, thank you!
In this study, one group of ex-offenders did a mindfulness intervention (there was no control group). They completed three mindfulness questionnaires before and after the intervention. Their risk of offending and several other demographic variables (e.g. age, length of sentence) were also recorded before the intervention.
I've been asked to analyse the effect of the intervention on mindfulness scores and look at whether any of the independent variables predict this.
What's the best analysis for this? I have multiple independent variables and dependent variables but only one group and I can't work out the best statistical test.
Is it possible to conduct Correlation analysis between variables that has pretest and posttest measures? If yes, how? And if no, what kind of analysis should I be conducting?
I would like to see if mindfulness correlates well with psychological wellbeing and perceived stress. However, I collected the data in a pre and post intervention manner (for mindfulness, psychological wellbeing and perceived stress) whereby mindfulness teaching was the intervention. Seeing that I have both pre and post scores, I was confused as to how should I conduct Pearson's correlation to see the relationship between mindfulness and perceived stress as well as mindfulness and psychological wellbeing.
***Some researchers suggested averaging the Pretest & Posttest scores while some have suggested using repeated measures correlation (rmcorr).
The literature so far ensues the probable discrepancies in the present mindfulness instruments either at conceptual level or psychometric level. I am going to be conducting my doctoral research in Pakistan and I am very much excited to introduce this phenomenon as an intervention or as a clinical endeavour. But i believe that this construct needs to be studied and understood as by the population it is being intended for and for that I was thinking of establishing an instrument that captures the Buddhist flavor ( having a more religious or faith-based tinge) as well as the Western psychological perspective (being relatively more tangible) .I was concerned about where to start, should I start from scratch (by first developing a working conceptual model) or should I use some earlier developed instruments as my baseline, like FFMQ ?
Any feedback or suggestions would be appreciated!!
I am very interested in understanding the specific benefits of practicing mindfulness in nature as well as the associated mechanistic aspects.
Are there any studies comparing the impact of the same mindfulness technique practiced in indoor vs. outdoor settings? For example a study comparing a group that practices Open Monitoring meditation indoors to a group that practices Open Monitoring meditation in a park or wild natural area.
Many thanks!
Catherine Baumgartner
Hi,
I was wondering if you have any results which you could share?
I am conducting MSc research on brief mindfulness and displaced aggression. I'm curious whether similar mechanism can govern both types of aggression and whether mindfulness affects them similarly.
How long is your mindfulness intervention?
Best wishes,
Dorota
