Science topics: Methodology
Science method
Methodology - Science method
Methodology are emergent methodologies in soft and hard sciences
Questions related to Methodology
The above questions are necessary when it comes to modelling description under the methodology section.
Hello dear researchers,
I need the right and best methodology to write a narrative review.
Thank you!
Greetings everyone.
During my master's research, I focused on exploring the potential of a specific bacterial strain to produce antibacterial compounds. To achieve this, I used the technique of liquid-liquid fractionation (Extraction) using butanol for the bacterial culture broth. Then, I subjected the supernatant to freeze-drying and further dissolved a portion of the butanol crude extract in methanol for analysis using GC-MS. The results revealed the presence of two secondary metabolite compounds, notably beta-carboline and cyclo-l-proline-l-leucine.
I investigated the genes and enzymes of the bacteria, and it appears that the genes and enzymes that synthesize beta-carboline and related compounds were not present in the bacteria. I have the genomic sequence date of the bacteria. I have searched the genome database to identify any genes or enzymes associated with the production of beta-carboline. Unfortunately, no such gene or enzyme seems to be directly related to the synthesis of beta-carboline in this bacterium. Also, my investigations regarding the McbB enzyme (which is an enzyme that works for the production of beta-carboline) have unfortunately provided no evidence of its presence in my bacterial strain.
So my question Is there an alternative methodology or approach by which I could clarify the mechanisms used by this bacterial strain to produce these compounds? For instance, the synthesis of beta-carboline usually involves the enzymatic action of tryptophan decarboxylase, which catalyzes the conversion of tryptophan to tryptamine. However, my bacterial strain seemingly lacks this specific enzyme. I am hoping that if any practical strategies or methodologies exist, I will try them as a first step to finding some answers for the synthetic pathway.
I sincerely appreciate any insights or directions you can provide.
Dear community,
I want to ask you a methodological/statistical question.
We performed ten independent hierarchical linear regressions divided by gender for an article writing (N=1502 participants, 39.9% men and 60.1% women). Could Type I error significantly arise through ten independent hierarchical linear regressions? Or do we have enough statistical power for each subgroup to guarantee that we have enough statistical power? I would also appreciate references that can help us make clear this matter.
Thank you so much!
Hi all,
My question is that,
Performing the analysis with the same data, with two different methodologies but still getting statistically insignificant results. Is it okay? If yes, how can this be justified.
Thank you!
August 25th, 2023
Those methodologies, we have to assume that are not the better ones, are being used to claim humans are 'making progresses' with regards the 2030 SDGs agenda.
As the ongoing human-sparked climate crisis and the huge Earth's ecology breakdowns seem unstoppable, scientists must ask what are the methodologies that are being used by other scientists to support those claims.
A generalized optimism keep asking time we (humans) do not have to fulfill those goals.
The 21st century science will be all about try to avoid a major planetary disruption sparked by just the biology-based dominant species.
We need metrics to avoid groundless discourses. That task will imply to create a system of systems regarding Earth observation in all scales.
It is relevant to say that the problem is not suitable for a technological perspective only... The problems we are facing are behavioral in nature.
Hernan L. Villagran
According to the journal cited below, methodology should be investigated whenever zone diameters are consistently not within the mean range because there might be an error. Control charts such as Shewhart Diagram, and Westgard rules were mentioned to be helpful in interpreting changes and monitoring the performance, aside from those two, what are the other useful methods that we can utilize to assess the zone diameter issues?
King, A., & Brown, D. F. J. (2001). Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 48(suppl_1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.71
I am doing some research in terms of Integrated Management Systems. And this topic is relevant in the research.
I am seeking papers elucidating the methodologies employed in addressing the intricacies inherent in the multi-index transportation problem and the multi-stage transportation problem. My objective is to compile a selection of papers that expound upon these techniques straightforwardly and methodically. This compilation aims to nominate them to benefit a fledgling researcher venturing into this domain. I am open to receiving recommendations that align with the above criteria, enhancing the material I intend to present to the aspiring researcher. Your valuable suggestions in this regard would be greatly appreciated.
Which sequence should be ideal to follow.
1. Research gap
2. Research question
3. Research objectives
4. Research methodology
or
1. Research question
2. Research methodology
Secondly in which sections of the paper (introduction or Literature review) the above should be placed. I find some people place in introduction while others put in the end of literature review section.
Looking for expert advice.
I am in the process of finalizing my individual grant proposal.
I really need your recommendation and your suggestions.
I have a question regarding my research, which will include interviews with experts and scientists. To ensure methodological reliability, I need at least two intercoders to participate in data analysis.
Could you advise how I can include these people in the project as intercoders?
Could these be the scientists who signed the LoI to collaborate on the project?
What is the correct way to describe this thing?
I will be grateful to you for any recommendations and advice.
Best regards,
Sabina
DOES THE WORLD HAVE A CLEARLY HOLISTIC FUTURE IN SCIENCE, SOCIETY, POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHY?
The world is used to thinking in terms of emotions and thoughts. But the stark difference between acts of emotion and acts of thought at the theoretical and practical levels can be bridged. The reason suggested is the following.
EVEN IF THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY AND CONNECTION BETWEEN EACH ACT OF THOUGHT AND EACH ACT OF EMOTION, THERE EXISTS PARTIAL CONTINUITY BETWEEN ANY FINITE NUMBER OF SUCH PROCESSES, AND HENCE, ALL OF THEM ARE SOMEHOW CONNECTED. THIS CONNECTION IS CAUSAL, AND NOT MERELY MATHEMATICAL OR QUANTUM-PHYSICAL.
As a result, even esthetic acts can be connected to the acts of thinking in the sciences, philosophy, literature, music, etc., both theoretically and practically. Neuroscience too can profit out of this paradigm change.
Further, when emotions, imaginations, reasonings, etc. are brought under the ambit of acts of logical reasoning, what would change in the theoretical acts of logical conclusions in the sciences, philosophy, literature, and other disciplines?
Naturally, also the character of the persons who are supposed to express thoughts, emotions, etc. in various ways for the good of humankind will take precedence. This is what value epistemology insists on.
As a result, the personalities behind and within the sciences, philosophy, literature, music, other performing arts, and also in the fields of teaching and other services, will be influenced and transformed substantially.
DOES THE WORLD HAVE SUCH A FUTURE? IF IT HAS, IT IS BETTER TO PRECIPITATE SUCH A FUTURE.
I am conducting my MSc in Organisational Psychology and my thesis is centred on how managers support their teams various needs (across both short- and long-term and with regard to wellbeing or performance).
In my analysis, I am observing codes which differ in the managers style when meeting their teams short term needs compared with their long term needs as the managers talk differently / use different language to explain their actions.
Would this be an example of discursive analysis, and if so, is it then inappropriate to refer to if using a IPA methodology?
Many thanks in advance!
I am developing a research model because I have identified a dearth of frameworks and models in a specific area. The examiners have requested that I include in the problem statement the absence of guidelines in that specific area. Are there differences between the terms 'guideline,' 'model,' and 'framework' in the context of research, particularly when referring to methodologies and approaches?
Hii !! Every one it would be great if you can suggest me links or can let me know about reflective methodology and thematic analysis in research ?
The materials science dissertation did not conduct experimental studies. What is the name and how to search on the Internet for this type of dissertation, in which, for example, they simply applied some method or developed some approach, but did not directly experiment, for example, to change the structure, did not create any materials, substances and etc. among the sciences where it is usually required to do this (materials science, chemistry)? Give examples of such dissertations. Thank you!
Methodology of developing language reflection of philology students - this is the theme of my dissertation work. So now I have been writing the last chapters. I need some information about new methods on how to reflect the students linguistic peculiarities.
Hello,
Greetings. I would like to measure the recovery percentage of the organic pollutants by spiking the samples with certain working standard concentrations. My samples were air dried and homogenized prior to extraction for GC. How do I spike the sediment samples? Should I directly add standard solution in the dried sediments and then follow the extraction procedure? Or by adding water with the dried sediments along with standard solution and let it air dried before following the extraction procedure?
Thanks for your time and consideration. I am looking forward to your insightful answers.
Greetings,
Hello everyone, I designed a boat hull in Catia V5. I want to define ply sequence and direction for that structure. I did lots of research but I couldn't find the appropriate solution for defining the fiber direction for that part.
Is there any particular methodology to define the ply sequence and direction for a give composite part to achieve desired mechanical properties.
Seeking insights into the forefront of agricultural extension research, this question aims to explore the novel methodologies that have recently emerged in the field.
Hello!
I am validating an adapted tool which suposly has 4 factors. The EFA agrees with it, but the CFA show bad fit indices (to make it work I need to free 3 items). Why is this happening? is it correct to fere this much items (scale has 14 items).
My article focuses on the changes in Land surface temperature, vegetation, and waterbodies over a long time in an area by using Landsat and Modis data with a new methodology.
Dear community,
I am planning on conducting experiments for which I need to obtain a plasma-free platelet suspension from an aliquote of a platelet concentrate. Do you now any methodology/protocol that allows for washing without extensive cell activation? I need the cells to be a "functional" as possible.
Yours sincerely,
Michael
i want to deduce the right methodology to understand reform impact on compliance behaviors and tax collection.
Hi, all
First of all, thank you so much for reading my question.
I am writing a manuscript, scoping review paper that includes quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method articles.
As methodological limitations, I have to describe drawbacks and solutions due to reviewing qualitative, mixed, and quantitative studies in one study.
In other words, I want to address the limitation and advantages of collecting and reviewing papers based on various research methods.
I need experienced researchers' precious opinions and thoughts.
Thank you so much for your comments in advance.
Jung
I need a methodological way to analyse an thesis or aticle
Let's discuss about whether you will prefer this methodology while writing a research paper or choose to modify/include/exclude any section or subsection from this methodology below.

My Awesomest Network, I have a methodological question. Should a scope of Ph.D. dissertaiton be maximally broad and wside in mentioned field of subject or rather be focused on deepening of very precise and tight problrems in detailed field?
The QCA (qualitative comparative analysis)method is a very popular qualitative research method. Now we are going to do a case study on a company and we can use 8 of its projects as sub-cases.
Question: Is the QCA methodology applicable to a single case study of this company?
Influence of political parties in tertiary, Using University of Ghana as a case study as research proposal with it methodology.
I have discovered a unique protein expressed in various tissues, yet its function remains unknown. To gain insight into its role, I seek your expertise in the latest techniques and verified methodologies in biological sciences. Please contribute your knowledge and perspectives to this thread on how to find a function of a gene.
The contents in the area of methodologies and literature review
Compliance costs are involved in the estimation of the marketing aspects of cattle milk.
Highlighting the different methodologies and data requirements involved.
I know spectrophotometer can be used for this work.Want to know about specific methodology.
Hi all, I have finished a methodological review protocol that we think should be published, because it proposes several new definitions for evidence synthesis. I was thinking in submitting it to BMJ Open, but I have no funding at the moment to pay for an Open Access journal. Do you know any non-open access journal where I could publish my protocol?
Paradigm shifts in social research refer to significant changes in the underlying frameworks, assumptions, and methodologies that guide the study of social phenomena. These shifts often occur when existing paradigms fail to adequately explain or account for new empirical findings or when alternative theoretical perspectives gain prominence. Paradigm shifts have profound implications for knowledge production and research practices, impacting the way researchers conceptualize, study, and interpret social phenomena.
One of the key implications of paradigm shifts is the reevaluation of existing knowledge and the creation of new knowledge. When a paradigm shift occurs, it challenges the established theories, concepts, and methodologies within a particular field. Researchers are compelled to critically reassess existing knowledge and reframe their understanding of social phenomena. This process can lead to the rejection or modification of previously accepted theories and the emergence of new theoretical frameworks that better capture the complexity of the social world. Paradigm shifts, therefore, drive the advancement and evolution of knowledge in social research.
Furthermore, paradigm shifts often result in changes in research practices and methodologies. As new theoretical perspectives gain traction, researchers may adopt different research methods and techniques that align with the new paradigm. For example, a paradigm shift from a positivist to a constructivist perspective may lead to a shift from quantitative research methods to qualitative approaches that focus on exploring subjective experiences and meanings. Researchers may also employ new tools and technologies to collect and analyze data, allowing for innovative and more nuanced investigations.
Paradigm shifts can also have implications for interdisciplinary collaborations and the integration of diverse perspectives. As new paradigms emerge, they may bridge different disciplinary boundaries and encourage interdisciplinary research. This can lead to the exchange of ideas, theories, and methodologies across disciplines, enriching the overall knowledge production in social research. Paradigm shifts also promote the incorporation of diverse voices and perspectives, as alternative theories and paradigms challenge the dominance of certain viewpoints and promote a more inclusive understanding of social phenomena.
However, it is important to note that paradigm shifts are not always readily accepted or smoothly implemented. They can be met with resistance from established researchers who are invested in the existing paradigm. The process of paradigm shift can be disruptive and unsettling, requiring researchers to reexamine their beliefs, assumptions, and research practices. This resistance can slow down the adoption of new paradigms and hinder the progress of knowledge production.
In conclusion, paradigm shifts in social research have far-reaching implications for knowledge production and research practices. They challenge existing theories and methodologies, leading to the reevaluation and creation of new knowledge. Paradigm shifts also influence research practices, shaping the selection and application of research methods. They encourage interdisciplinary collaborations and the incorporation of diverse perspectives, but can also face resistance from established researchers. Embracing paradigm shifts is crucial for advancing social research and ensuring its relevance and rigor in understanding and addressing complex social phenomena.
How is AI applied in basic education?I'll appreciate if you can provide specific activities or methodologies on how it is applied to teaching- learning.
I am currently engaged in the modeling of a membrane packed bed reactor, specifically in its initial stages where only a packed bed reactor is considered, and the model has not yet incorporated a membrane or its associated effects.
Regrettably, I have encountered a challenge during the modeling process.
In my current model, the desired total concentration is expected to remain constant, while the velocity should vary accordingly. However, I have observed the opposite effect, which is contrary to my expectations.
I kindly request your esteemed insights regarding the potential reasons behind this discrepancy. Despite thoroughly reviewing my methodology and variables, I have been unable to pinpoint the root cause. Any suggestions or recommendations you could offer to assist me in resolving this issue would be highly appreciated.
Thank you sincerely for your attention and expertise. I eagerly look forward to receiving your invaluable input.
More and more students are using AI to aid their bibliographic research. But to what extent in fact is there a real dedication to using the tool as an auxiliary tool and not as your way of writing.
Generally we use different methodology according to our subject requirement but some time we feel same methodology is used by 2 different authors and the finding are totally different.
I am doing a study on electrical supply in NZ. I have many contacts but not everyone took part so I can only use those who say yes to taking part. I am struggling to name this approach to data collection to put in my methodology chapter. Please can someone help me? in other words, I could only use what I could get.
Thank you - I know someone will have come across this as well.
Must a review paper in the Robotic include a section on methodology and conclusion? Is there a requirement for the selection of search data-base?
Hi everyone,
I am working on studying the perspectives towards persons with disabilities among a small sample of secondary students (n=12). I have come across a very interesting questionnaire called the "New Scale to Assess Attitudes and Perspectives Toward Persons With Disabilities". However, I have concerns about the meaningfulness of administering the questionnaire to such a small sample size. I am considering transforming the questionnaire's questions into discussion items for a focus group. However, I am unsure if this approach is methodologically appropriate."
I wan to design a knowledge management cycle model for a specific area . which methodology is usefull?
Studying the various philosophers, even the contemporary thinkers, is a matter of study and analysis. Whatever our stage of development is, such study and analysis can only be educating ourselves in the strict sense. Thinking for ourselves is also part of the process, which should have greater weightage as the educative phase is had long enough.
Now what about forgetting for some time the contributions of the many philosophers of our time or of the past, especially the kind whom we all mention habitually, and then theorizing philosophically for ourselves without constant references to their works and notions, as doctoral students do?
Why do I suggest this? Such dependence on the works of the stalwarts and of the specialists on them may veil our abilities to see many things for ourselves. Thus, we can avoid becoming philosophical technicians and even the slightly better case of becoming philosophical technologists or philosophical experts.
I believe that synthesizing upon some good insights from the many thinkers and from the many disciplines would require also the inevitable conceptual foundations that we would be able to discover beyond these notions.
Suppose each of us looks for such foundations, and then share them on a platform. If the discussion is on these new foundations, something may emerge in each of us as what we could term genuine foundations. These need not remain forever, because philosophy and science show grow out of whatever we and others have done. But, as a result of the effort, we will have effected a better synthesis through such personal efforts than when without seeking foundations.
I think the conceptual foundations on which the concept of synthetic philosophy works may thus gain a lot. I for one consider the whole history of analytic and linguistic philosophy as lacking such rigour. You all may differ from what each one of us suggests. That is the manner in which deeper foundations can be sought. I am on such a journey.
I believe that in the journey to find deeper and more general foundations than those available, we will already have created a manner of doing philosophy independently, and if done in conjunction with the sciences, we will have a new manner of doing the philosophy of science. Fell trees from their roots, and we have the place to plant a new tree.
Let me suggest a question. All these 2.5 millennia of western philosophy, we have not found the question of the implications of existence (to exist, To Be) being discussed. Plato and Aristotle have tried it, and thereafter we do not see much on the implications of To Be. Now if some implications of To Be are found, these could be a strong foundation for philosophy of any kind. I hope we cannot find such implications of Non-existence for doing philosophy or science. The definitions of the implications of To Be will change in the course of time, but some core might continue to remain, if we do something validly deep and general enough.
Let me suggest an interesting manner in which many philosophers evaluate their peers. (This may also be applicable in all other fields.) This is here brought to a historical context, not merely theoretical. This I do in order to make the example very clear.
Suppose you (say, A) speak of space, time, entities, matter-energy, etc. in a special context. The peer (say, B) gets hold of the text and starts criticizing A’s notion of space, time, entities, matter-energy, etc. B starts from the concepts of space and time. He says, Kant and thereafter almost all thinkers have placed space and time merely as epistemic categories. This has been done in the context of phenomena. If you (A) hold the epistemic variety of notions of space and time, then they are phenomenal. In that case, you should have studied in the text what phenomena meant in Kant and analyze the scientific and philosophical consequences of those concepts.
B continues. If you wanted to make space and time metaphysical concepts, then you are speaking of the noumena. For Kant these are unknowables. Hence, you need to first show that the noumena are knowables. In that case you are rightful in suggesting epistemic / epistemological concepts of space and time. If not, you need to take recourse to other relevant philosophers or scientific disciplines to demonstrate the metaphysical meaning of space and time that you have introduced. And so on.
Absolute dependence upon the traditions and unpreparedness to think differently from the past or present thinkers is what is exhibited here. Not that B is not intelligent enough. B is. But the preparedness to think for years and decades differently comes not merely from the desire to think differently, but from the desire to SOLVE ALL THE PROBLEMS OF THE WORLD TOGETHER. We know we are being overambitious. If we demonstrate such an attitudes in our behaviour to others, then it is due to an intellectual sense of preponderance. But if we remain receptive to all new inputs from all others and all sciences, we will continue to be enabled to persevere in methodological obverambitiousness.
The peer had already decided how the author should write. It seems that the author should have written on all sub-themes within the title a separate book or part in the book....! Or, should he have cited from all sorts of authors on all possible sub-themes in his book in order to be approved by the peer?
Yet another systematically dominative and other-debilitating manner of peers is this: Say, I submit to you the publisher a book. The publisher sends it to the peer/s. Without even taking time for a good reading of the text, the peer suggests some opinions to the publishers, which the publisher relates to the author in a day or two: Your work may be very good, but its title is too broad. An author cannot do justice to the whole breadth of the subject matter!
Have you heard or read psychologists, neuroscientists, medical doctors, etc. discussing some symptoms and their causes? A book in psychology says: ‘According to the bio-psycho-social approach in psychopathology, one mental disturbance CAN have many causes.’ But a person trained and enthusiastic about philosophy (also of the philosophy of the sciences) would wonder why there should not be many causes, at least some of which one could seek to find...! Discovering ‘only the immediate, exact, and unique cause’ is not their work because any reason can tell us that nothing in this world has an exact cause.
This directs our attention to a basic nature of philosophy: Not that a philosopher should only generalize. But a philosopher should study any specific thing only in terms of the most generalizable notions. Here ‘generality’ does not directly indicate only abstraction. It demonstrates the viewpoint that philosophy always takes. Hence, speaking only of the linguistic formulation of notions and arguments, formulating arguments only of life-related events in order to prove general principles that belong to the whole of Reality, etc. are not philosophical. The philosophically trained reader can recognize which recent trends in philosophy I have in mind here.
I may be talking strange things here, especially for those trained mainly in analytic philosophy and the philosophy of science in a narrow manner. If you do not find such suggestions interesting, just ignore this intervention. I continue to work on this. I do have some success. Each of us has our own manner of approaching the problems.
I am aware that I may be laughed at. Since I have left the profession of teaching, I do not lose much. Moreover, getting great publishers is out of reach for me, but that too does not compound to much consequence if eventually one succeeds to do something solid.
Bibliography
(1) Gravitational Coalescence Paradox and Cosmogenetic Causality in Quantum Astrophysical Cosmology, 647 pp., Berlin, 2018.
(2) Physics without Metaphysics? Categories of Second Generation Scientific Ontology, 386 pp., Frankfurt, 2015.
(3) Causal Ubiquity in Quantum Physics: A Superluminal and Local-Causal Physical Ontology, 361 pp., Frankfurt, 2014.
(4) Essential Cosmology and Philosophy for All: Gravitational Coalescence Cosmology, 92 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 2nd Edition.
(5) Essenzielle Kosmologie und Philosophie für alle: Gravitational-Koaleszenz-Kosmologie, 104 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 1st Edition.
Dear scientists and researchers,
If you have any kind of experince or knowledge on flood risk mapping in urban areas (i.e., methodology, risk estimation, map preparation, etc), please kindly share your findings and knowledge.
Thank you in advance and looking forward to collaborating together.
Naser Dehghanian
What is the "snowball technique" or "snowball sampling" in research?
[1]Rameshwar Gupta*,
Research Scholar,
Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension
CSJM University, Kanpur, U.P. India
Email id: rameshwargupta775@gmail.com
Mobile: +918630831266
The "snowball technique" or "snowball sampling" is a research method used to identify and recruit participants for a study when the target population is difficult to access or locate. It is particularly useful in cases where the population being studied is small, hidden, or marginalized.
In the snowball technique, researchers begin by identifying and recruiting a few initial participants who meet the criteria for the study. Once these participants are involved, they are then asked to refer other individuals who they believe also meet the study's criteria. This process continues, with each new participant referring additional participants, hence the term "snowball," as the sample size grows.
The technique relies on the assumption that individuals within the target population have social networks and can provide referrals to others who share similar characteristics or experiences. This method is commonly used in qualitative research, particularly in fields such as sociology, anthropology, and psychology.
Snowball sampling can be advantageous in accessing hard-to-reach populations, as it relies on existing social connections and networks. It is often used when studying sensitive topics or marginalized communities where it is challenging to obtain a representative sample through traditional sampling methods. However, it is important to note that snowball sampling may introduce biases, as participants are typically connected through existing relationships and may share certain characteristics or perspectives.
Researchers using the snowball technique should exercise caution in interpreting the findings, acknowledging the limitations of the sampling method and potential biases. It is also important to ensure participant confidentiality and obtain informed consent throughout the research process.
References:
Few references that provide more information on snowball sampling in research:
- · Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1-4. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html
- · Biernacki, P. (1986). Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Temple University Press.
- · Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141-163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205
- · Bock, M. A., & Harel, O. (2010). Sampling Hard-to-Reach Populations With Snowball Sampling Methodology: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. In M. L. Tatum (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (2nd ed., pp. 3-20). Routledge.
- · Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2010). Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 285-327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x
- · Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170.
- · Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174-199. doi:10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m
These references cover various aspects of snowball sampling, including its methodology, strengths, limitations, and applications in different research contexts. You can access these articles and books through academic databases or university libraries to gain a more in-depth understanding of the snowball sampling technique.
[1]Ph.D. Student, Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension, CSJM University, Kanpur, U.P., India, Email id: rameshwargupta775@gmail.com, Mobile: 8630831266
*Single author
It's just a more general question. I understand that the objectives and methodology must be considered
I am planning a MSc Dissertation but I am not quite sure on how to go about the methodology. I will appreciate any hints or recommendation on how to go about this.
Is there any resemblance in how "information flow" happens in humans (Molecular Biology/Neurology) and computers (Computer Networking)?
This question came to be after a note was made by a Computer Networking (CN) lecturer that no new methodologies for information flow in CN to be discovered.
I got interested to look for the answer in the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, and still awaits further insights.
Require Sampling Methodology and Testing Methodology to find out the results about interaction between heavy metals, microorganism and microplastics in sediments of mangroves
Any source/s to refer to on identifying methodological gaps/methodology gaps in research?
Please mention the links.
Hi everyone. Currently, I'm writing a research paper in which I'm working on a paper similar to a paper published. In my paper, I changed only one variable. So my question is that should I copy his methodology? Well, obviously I know that I can copy their methodology but my real question is that I'm writing the paper and if I'm copying their methodology and their reasons should I cite him again and again? My second question is doesn't this makes my paper dull and duller... Share your thoughts
Hybrid project management methodology is helping many project managers around the world improve their achievements. However, can hybrid methodology guarantee better results on Oil and Gas industry?
Is it possible to quantify the degree of synergy between two or more companies? What methodologies can be used for this? For example, between companies where the activity of one has an qualitative impact on the others.
the methodology for this type of study (studying historical buildings in terms of the architectural style)
Including assessment of the robustness of results.
Hi all,
I am a student working towards gaining my nursing Master's degree. I am conducting qualitative research to explore the nursing Students’Experiences of Electronic Medical Records During Placements. My question is: Is it correct to use constructivist theory approach,interpretative phenomenology and thematic analysis for my methodology/approch/data analysis?
Thank you.
Is it methodologically possible to conduct and interpret descriptive analyses in rotational panel data?
Dear fellows,
Maybe you have done interesting measurements to test some model?
I can always use such data to use as examples and tests for my regression analysis software, and it's a win-win, since I might give you a second opinion on your research.
It's important that I also get the imprecision (measurement error/confidence interval) on the independent and dependent variables. At this moment, my software only handles one of each, but I'm planning to expand it for more independent variables.
Thanks in advance!
Existing book Software Engineering Methodologies:
1. Waterfall Model
2. Prototyping Model
3. Automatic Programming
4. Reusable Model
5. Incremental Model
6. Spiral Model
7. Fountain Model
Existing most commercial Software Engineering Methodologies:
1. Agile Software Development Methodology
2. DevOps Methodology
3. Scrum Development Methodology
4. Waterfall Model
5. Prototype Methodology
6. Feature-Driven Development
7. Rapid Application Development (RAD)
8. Spiral Model
9. Dynamic Systems Development Model Methodology
10. Extreme Programming Methodology
11. Joint Application Development Methodology
12. Lean Development Methodology
We will address several questions about the above books and commercial methodologies later and provide a Unified and Stable Methodology to replace all these existing methodologies.
Existing Software Engineering Methodologies. Good, Bad, and ugliness, and please do not be fooled by several propagandas about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_development_philosophies (Contain flawed information about software engineering) which include many named existing paradigms and models, such as UAP, XP, RAD, RUP, DSDM, MBSE, and other methodologies and Frameworks, Supporting Disciplines, Practices, Tools, Body of knowledge, and Glossaries. We will address all this propaganda and more in evidence and empirical studies.
Check the. Software engineering References – We will look at some references (bizarre). We will also provide critical looks at course notes and exciting books.
All the SWE Methodologies have the following phases Explicitly and Implicitly, with the amount of work allocated per each phase according to the
Software Engineering simplified Guidelines:
Requirements (Functional and Non-Functional) 35%
Design 25%
Coding or Programming & Code Testing 10%
Testing 30%
In Practice:
Requirements (Functional and Non-Functional) 0
Design 5%
Coding or Programming & Code Testing 95%
Testing 0
See Attachments
Major Problems:
[1] Sequential
[2] Testing in the wrong place in the lifecycle
{3] Requirements and Design (60% of the lifecycle) 60% of the lifecycle.
In reality, there needs to be a trace of the requirements and design.
[4] The professors, lecturers, teachers, gurus, Deans, and Chairs need to learn about Requirements, Design, and Testing, and they are poor coders.
[5] All SWE Books, leading authors, and SWE Gurus need to learn about Requirements (Functional and Non-Functional): a) Do not know how to do it and b) it needs to be addressed.
[6] Design / Architecture ---
a) The majority of the professors, lecturers, teachers, Guru, and authors are poor modelers
b) Most professors, lecturers, teachers, gurus, and authors have yet to learn what they are doing.
Software Lifecycle with no Testing Stage
A proposal for a software methodology includes Testing with 1) Functional & non-functional Requirements, 2) Design & Architecture, and 3) Coding instead of having the Testing at the end of the lifecycle.
The leading authors in Software Engineering and software testing indicated that Testing starts from or makes it part of the requirements (functional and non-functional), design, and coding.
Tkachenko indicated five primary and four secondary attributes of requirements for software testing:
+ Five primary attributes of requirements testing are Completeness, Clearness, Correctness, Consistency, and Testability.
+ Four secondary attributes of requirements testing are Necessity, Priority, Traceability, and Conciseness.
Evgeny Tkachenko, “5 key attributes of requirements testing: Know before you code.” TechBeacon, 2022
Major Problems
[1] There are no functional and non-functional not exist. How do we test if something is not existing?
[2] Indicating the attributes of requirements Testing without telling what to test and how to test each one of the attributes within the requirements, how to assess or measure such attributes, and others.
The reality did not change, and still, the design was 5% and coding 95%
See attachments.
Conclusions:
Each of the existing books and commercial software engineering methodologies has Good and Bad, but unfortunately, the Ugly (disastrous evil) of all the existing software engineering methodologies exceeds its Bad.



What are the ways to prepare metal oxides composite with activated carbon (metal oxides + activated carbon) ? Any preferred methodology?
How can I develop a methodology for communicating the experience of how space alters our perception of time in architecture, specifically by using drawing techniques to diagram or codify the difference between the perception of time in space and the passage of time in space, for my thesis in architecture?
Dear all,
What are the best methodologies to find out the ectomycorrhizal colonization on roots? I am looking for a publishable methodology to have a tuber sp. percentages of my seedlings.
Digital Transformation is not only about technology but more about people and their mind-sets.
Would like to study the topic in organizational context.
Any suggestions on how to proceed? What should be the methodology?
Any researchers working in this area who would like to collaborate?
Greetings!
I hope this message finds you well. I would be very grateful if you please provide your valuable feedback regarding the scope, feasibility, and methodology of the following research topics:
1. Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion.
2. Mobile Financial Services and Financial Inclusion.
Thank you.
1. Ideas in points will be appreciated
2. Methodology will be greatful.
In social studies, comparative studies are common and attract many researchers to follow this approach. Methodology and sampling might encounter a researcher when he has just started to plan for such a study.
So how can we design a proper sampling structure for a comparative study?
I'm starting a PhD and considering various methodologies for this research and getting a bit bogged down!