Science topic
Mental Competency - Science topic
The ability to understand the nature and effect of the act in which the individual is engaged. (From Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed).
Questions related to Mental Competency
Dear Researchers,
I hope you are in perfect condition. I am conducting a study on ICC of English learners. While I have garnered and sieved through materials from different resources, still I am dubious regarding the validity of my material. What materials could I utilize to improve my EFL learners' Intercultural Communicative Competence? My students are Pre-intermediate English learners.
I will be more than appreciative if I could receive your illuminating answers at mardaneh@znu.ac.ir
Yours truly,
Farhad Mardaneh
Ph.D. candidate in TEFL, IKIU, Qazvin, Iran
Hi. Where can I possibly get the full copy of these following tools for my research: Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Competence ( ICCN-CS-1) and Nursing Caring Behavior Scale ( NCBS). Thank you.
Que pensez vous des compétences numériques dans le domaine éducatif?
I am conducting a study on the professional competencies of social workers working with children exposed to domestic violence. Are there standards, studies, or researchers that can assist me in my study?
Hello everyone,
I had some plasmids synthesized by TWIST. I transformed them into homemade chemically competent NEB-stable. During the outgrowth, I accidentally grew them at 37C instead of 30C, as recommended by NEB. I did the final plating/incubation at 30C, as recommended.
I don't believe my inserts are particularly unstable; they're just E. coli K-12 genes under the T7lacI promoter. I wanted them in NEB-stable due to the Laciq mutation that NEB-stable has to make lacI even stronger at repressing.
My question is, would the 37C outgrowth have that big of an impact on transformation efficiency?
Hi all
I was wondering if anyone ever came across a scenario where S aureus ΔRM Systems were working for electroporation and all of a sudden stopped. I had a batch stop working, so I threw it out streaked a new plate from the glycerol stock and redid the competent cells multiple times including the 1 I primarily used for the cells I used for a full year. All conditions were met the cells were stored in a -80, removed as needed and thawed on ice, DNA ranging 0.1 - 1.5 ug was used but no colonies, the Abx was tested on non plasmid carrying bacteria and its working when the cells themselves are grown with no selection pressure they grow, can anyone give any opinions as to what could be wrong?.
Ps the electroporator was tested on E coli and it works,
Need to consider different aspects: new generations, digitalization and new skills and competencies.
Hi Everyone,
My PhD research focuses on developing an assessment model to evaluate employees' competencies.
I’m currently facing two key challenges:
- Model Reliability: I need to validate my model's reliability, but I'm uncertain about the best approach to computing this. Are there specific methods or best practices you'd recommend for assessing reliability in such competency models?
- Threshold Setting: I'm also struggling with how to define thresholds for competency levels (e.g., "Not Competent" under 20%, "Somewhat Competent" between 20% and 40%, etc.). What are some systematic ways to set these thresholds to ensure they are meaningful and actionable?
I'd greatly appreciate any insights, resources, or experiences you could share. Thank you so much for your time and support!
Best regards,
Marco
Why are some people keen to continue their efforts without pausing every now and then to reconsider their priorities, and they may be surprised that someone who was less competent and experienced than them has achieved greater achievements?
It is claimed that there are plenty of advantages in having a functioning competency model in a company. But what are potential or actual drawbacks of a competency model that may have negative impact on organisation and its employees?
Mach1 are competent E. coli cells. Mach1 is obviously an abbreviation. What does it stands for?
Одной из наиболее фундаментальных (и, в то же время, не всегда заметных) проблем современного образования, является неопределенность смысловых и, как следствие, категориальных оснований понимания современной ситуации. Разумеется, нет недостатка в публикациях, характеризующих те или иные «тренды» и «тенденции»; не менее популярны и статьи, определяющие модели и алгоритмы проектной, исследовательской и управленческой деятельности, однако сведение воедино объективированных последовательностей событий и сюжетов и субъективированных стратегий и моделей деятельности в этих условиях представляет существенную и пока неразрешенную проблему.
Вероятно, возможной концептуализацией этого феноменологического, по сути, отношения (ноэзис как коррелят базовых установок – исследовательских, управленческих, инновационных и ноэма – как предметная характеристика самой реальности образования), является категория «трансформации». Одним из её несомненных достоинств является возможность сопряжения «естественных» (натурализованных) и «субъектных» (культурных, деятельностных) аспектов происходящих изменений.
В этой связи, возникает несколько взаимосвязанных вопросов об актуальной сущности трансформации образования, включающих:
1. Какова онтология трансформации образования: в каких историко-культурных, научных и религиозно-философских традициях мы можем рассматривать происходящую трансформацию образования? Имеем ли мы дело с неким процессом, либо совокупностью феноменов, либо еще каким-то иным объектом?
2. Каковы методологические предпосылки основных стратегий познавательной (исследовательской), управленческой и профессиональной деятельности в условиях трансформации? Как меняется институциональный и инструментальный ландшафт образования в условиях трансформации?
3. Каковы системные последствия трансформаций в когнитивной, институциональной, политико-экономической сфере? Как связаны различные аспекты трансформаций в современном образовательном пространстве?
4. Кто является субъектом трансформации, и с точки зрения, реального участника трансформационных процессов, и с точки зрения того, какой субъект формируется внутри трансформирующейся образовательной реальности?
Вполне очевидно, что ответ на каждый из поставленных вопросов представляет собой отдельное направление исследований. В этой связи позволим себе кратко представить материалы, которые могут оказаться полезными для их обсуждения.
1. Историко-культурные основания и опыты трансформаций в образовании.
· Мидраш и софизм в контексте трансформации научно-образовательной традиции в XXI веке https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370040978_Midras_i_sofizm_v_kontekste_transformacii_naucno-obrazovatelnoj_tradicii_v_XXI_veke
· Рецензия на книгу «Адольф Тренделенбург. Элементы логики Аристотеля» https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385822668_RECENZIA_NA_KNIGU_ADOLFA_TRENDELENBURGA_ELEMENTY_LOGIKI_ARISTOTELA
· Антропологический проект в образовании: опасности и перспективы (к 200-летию К.Д.Ушинского) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360371769_Antropologiceskij_proekt_v_obrazovanii_potencial_i_opasnost_po_proctenii_Opyta_pedagogiceskoj_antropologii_KDUsinskogo
· Принцип целостности: от педагогической идеи В.С.Ильина – к феноменологии образования XXI века https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385789146_Princip_celostnosti_ot_pedagogiceskoj_idei_VSIlina_-_k_fenomenologii_obrazovania_XXI_veka
· 12 этюдов о рациональности. Заметки на полях «Пропорциональности и современного мира» Ивана Иллича/ «Общество без школ?». Перечитывая Паоло Фрейре и Ивана Иллича https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385825176_12_etudov_o_racionalnosti_Zametki_na_polah_Proporcionalnosti_i_sovremennogo_mira_Ivana_Illica
· Инновации, традиции и проблема «Другого» в образовании https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380035700_INNOVACII_TRADICII_I_PROBLEMA_DRUGOGO_V_OBRAZOVANII
· Дидактика как историческая система знания: современность и перспектива https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380165568_Didaktika_kak_istoriceskaa_sistema_znania_sovremennost_i_perspektiva
2. Теоретико-методологические проблемы познания/исследования трансформаций.
· Научно-педагогическое познание как онтологический феномен https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385738286_Naucno-pedagogiceskoe_poznanie_kak_ontologiceskij_fenomen
· К проблеме пространственно-полевой парадигмы исследований в образовании https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385738023_K_probleme_prostranstvenno-polevoj_paradigmy_issledovanij_v_obrazovanii
· К проблеме программирования научных исследований непрерывного образования в полевом подходе https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340493392_TO_THE_ISSUE_OF_SCIENTIFIC_RESEARCH_PROGRAMMING_IN_CONTINUOUS_EDUCATION_FIELD_APPROACH
· Проективная модель исследовательского дискурса в сфере образования «постковидного мира» https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385788499_Proektivnaa_model_issledovatelskogo_diskursa_v_sfere_obrazovania_postkovidnogo_mira
· Хронотополингвистический (ХТЛ) подход к исследованиям трансформаций образования https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371829475_Stata_Bermusa_AG_Hronotopolingvisticeskij_HTL_podhod_k_issledovaniam_transformacii_obrazovania
· Основы топологической модели реализации компетентностного подхода https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385823968_OSNOVY_TOPOLOGICESKOJ_MODELI_REALIZACII_KOMPETENTNOSTNOGO_PODHODA
· Академическое мошенничество и имитации в высшей школе как онтологический вызов образованию XXI века https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369362121_AKADEMICESKOE_MOSENNICESTVO_I_IMITACII_V_VYSSEJ_SKOLE_KAK_ONTOLOGICESKIJ_VYZOV_OBRAZOVANIU_XXI_V
· Трансформация поля исследований и инноваций в сфере педагогического образования (по итогам IX Международного форума по педагогическому образованию) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375343270_Transformacia_pola_issledovanij_i_innovacij_v_sfere_pedagogiceskogo_obrazovania_po_itogam_IX_Mezdunarodnogo_foruma_po_pedagogiceskomu_obrazovaniu
3. Проблемы и перспективы подготовки исследователей и инноваторов в сфере образования в условиях трансформации
· К проблеме разработки паспортов научных специальностей по педагогическим наукам https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355034503_K_PROBLEME_RAZRABOTKI_PASPORTOV_NAUCNYH_SPECIALNOSTEJ_PO_PEDAGOGICESKIM_NAUKAM
· Designing research programs in the field of teacher education in the global context https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347162078_Designing_Research_Programs_in_the_Field_of_Teacher_Education_in_the_Global_Context
· The Project of the Research Master’s Degree Program in the Education Sphere https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349168397_The_Project_of_the_Research_Master's_Degree_Program_in_the_Education_Sphere
· Исследовательская магистратура в сфере образования как центр развития региональных научно-образовательных кластеров https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348443780_ISSLEDOVATELSKAA_MAGISTRATURA_V_SFERE_OBRAZOVANIA_KAK_CENTR_MODERNIZACII_REGIONALNOGO_UNIVERSITETSKOGO_KLASTERA
· Phenomenology of Research Experience as the Basis for the Design of Pedagogical Master’s Programs https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375922245_PHENOMENOLOGY_OF_RESEARCH_EXPERIENCE_AS_THE_BASIS_FOR_THE_DESIGN_OF_PEDAGOGICAL_MASTER%27S_PROGRAMS_FENOMENOLOGIA_ISSLEDOVATELSKOGO_OPYTA_KAK_OSNOVANIE_DIZAJNA_PEDAGOGICESKOJ_MAGISTRATURY#fullTextFileContent
4. Системные аспекты трансформации педагогического образования.
· Репрезентация стандартизации педагогического образования в полевом подходе https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385736981_REPREZENTACIA_STANDARTIZACII_PEDAGOGICESKOGO_OBRAZOVANIA_V_POLEVOM_PODHODE
· Разработка локальных образовательных стандартов как стратегия модернизации педагогического образования https://eandsdjournal.kpfu.ru/ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/10/ESD60-14.pdf
· Качество образования как проблемы трансформации научно-образовательной инфраструктуры https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376308210_Kacestvo_obrazovania_kak_problema_transformacii_naucno-obrazovatelnoj_infrastruktury
· Компетентностно-ориентированная стратегия развития профильных педагогических классов в муниципальном образовательном пространстве https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385738015_KOMPETENTNOSTNO-ORIENTIROVANNAA_STRATEGIA_RAZVITIA_PROFILNYH_PEDAGOGICESKIH_KLASSOV_V_MUNICIPALNOM_OBRAZOVATELNOM_PROSTRANSTVE
· Борисенков В.П., Бермус А.Г., Берил С.И., Гукаленко О.В. Международный опыт развития педагогического образования https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385828354_Mezdunarodnyj_opyt_razvitia_pedagogiceskogo_obrazovania_na_sovremennom_etape
· Стратегия развития педагогического образования в современной России https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385823172_Strategia_razvitia_pedagogiceskogo_obrazovania_v_sovremennoj_Rossii
· Содержание педагогического образования в современном мире: смыслы, проблемы, практики и перспективы развития https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357458007_Soderzanie_pedagogiceskogo_obrazovania_v_sovremennom_mire_smysly_problemy_praktiki_i_perspektivy_razvitia
· Development of human capital of educational institutions in the context of competence approach https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338020509_Development_of_Human_Capital_of_Educational_Institutions_in_the_Context_of_the_Competence_Approach
· The value fundamentals for the development of the corporate culture of faculty members in a digital society https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339432118_The_Value_Fundamentals_for_the_Development_of_the_Corporate_Culture_of_Faculty_Members_in_a_Digital_Society
· Обеспечение конкурентоспособности профессионального образования в условиях цифровой образовательной среды https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353480936_Obespecenie_konkurentosposobnosti_professionalnogo_obrazovania_v_usloviah_cifrovoj_obrazovatelnoj_sredy
· Актуальные проблемы педагогического образования в эпоху трансформации: теоретический обзор https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385788807_Aktualnye_problemy_pedagogiceskogo_obrazovania_v_epohu_cifrovoj_transformacii_teoreticeskij_obzor
Цифровая трансформация высшего образования с позиций междисциплинарного подхода: обзор гуманитарных исследований https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359618280_Cifrovaa_transformacia_vyssego_obrazovania
Научно-образовательный проект развития педагогической кафедры ЮФУ
Концепция развития педагогического образования в федеральном многопрофильном университете (на примере ЮФУ) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385900052_Koncepcia_razvitia_pedobrazovania_v_federalnom_mnogoprofilnom_universitete_na_primere_UFU
What are the conditions for developing legal competence in students of technical specialties? What is the importance of studying law?
Service-related businesses are seeking for opportunities to expand globally, but what indicators should be considered in order to compete in global markets and gain advantage? Is there any specific model they should take into account? What papers would you recommend to read?
I would be grateful if you could share your insights with me
regards, Amin Shahinpour
In many real-world scenarios, we need to optimize more than one objective function simultaneously. For instance, in engineering, we might want to minimize cost while maximizing performance. The challenge lies in finding a solution that balances these competing objectives.
My questions is how can we efficiently solve multi-objective optimization problems with a large number of objectives?
I need all information about communicative competence
Hi everyone. I'm actually doing a study on the teaching of sociolinguistic competence. I'd like to know what you think of research on the area of sociolinguistic competence.
I noticed that more people focus specifically on speech acts. I understand that speech acts also falls under pragmatic competence. I have an opinion that maybe people prefer to do studies on speech acts (and not other aspects of sociolinguistic competence) because they are more easily measurable and observable.
What do you think?
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
Which tools are used in curriculum mapping of e.g. certain competences (subject-specific or transferrable) across the curriculum to ensure coherence?
I'm interested primarily in tertiary education.
Tools can be common office applications (MS Office etc.) or specific purpose tools (curriculum mapping tools). I would also be interested to learn if any university developed their own curriculum mapping tool.
I've been experiencing challenges ligating a promoter sequence into my vector. My vector size is approximately 7.5 kb, and the promoter sequences I’m working with range from 58 bp to 171 bp (GC content: 28-31%). These promoters were synthesized as ultramer duplexes.
For ligation, I always use the same dual restriction enzymes (KpnI and SpeI) to cut both my vector and insert. After restriction digestion, I heat-inactivate the enzymes at 80°C for at least 30 minutes. I dephosphorylate the vector using shrimp alkaline phosphatase for at least 60 minutes, followed by gel purification. For my inserts, I have tried several approaches: direct column purification, gel purification, and even using the unpurified digestion product in the ligation reaction. I do **not** dephosphorylate the insert.
My ligation attempts have involved various ratios and conditions:
- 1:3, 1:5, and 1:7 vector-to-insert ratios
- Overnight ligation at 16°C
- 26-hour ligation at 4°C
- 1-hour ligation at room temperature
I then perform chemical transformations into *E. coli*. Unfortunately, I haven’t obtained any colonies.
My experimental setup includes several controls:
1. **Positive control** using pUC19 to confirm the competency of my cells.
2. **Negative control** with vector-only (restriction digested + dephosphorylated) to check for residual or recircularized plasmids.
All my controls work as expected:
- The pUC19 transformation yields colonies, confirming my competent cells are functional.
- The vector-only control yields no colonies, suggesting successful restriction digestion and dephosphorylation.
Interestingly, using the same conditions but different restriction enzymes, I have successfully ligated and inserted two other sequences (103 and 114 bp, GC content 52% and 46%) into the same vector. What could I be missing or overlooking with the promoter sequences?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
I'm a student of Psychology. I'm currently doing a research on perceived competence in young adult men. I need "sense of competence questionnaire" by Wagner and Morse(1975). I couldn't get access to it directly. If anyone have this questionnaire plz provide me here. I assure it is just for academic purpose. I'll be highly grateful.
• Students will participate in role-playing activities to apply language skills in various simulated scenarios. could anyone suggests any role playing activities
How can social protection systems in developing countries be designed to effectively balance the competing demands of fiscal sustainability, social equity, and economic efficiency?
This study focuses on the instructional competencies of the master teachers in the Philippines
Can I apply heat shock transformation method for Gram positive competent Bacteria?
I need to transform a plasmid of 10 kbp in Gram positive competent Bacterial. Right now, I do not have electroporation facility. Is there any successful record of heat shock transformation in Gram positive Bacteria? If yes, does it require any modifications in procedure?
The literature on Supply Chain Integration (SCI), Supply Chain Management (SCM), and collaborations, spanning several decades, deserves special attention. This topic, although addressed for a long time, remains contemporary and continues to be the subject of in-depth studies. The interest lies in understanding why collaboration in the supply chain remains a highly studied research topic, particularly concerning supplier relationships.
To achieve this, this study is organized around SCM and SCI, then purchases intended for sale in general, followed by strategic purchases, and finally the purchasing function in SMEs and its contribution to performance. The aim is to understand the purchasing behavior and competencies of SMEs, focusing on practices and examining their impact on value creation and long-term competitive advantage.
For this reason, this study aims to analyze supply chain management in a disrupted context. The objective is to discover how to optimize the purchasing function within an Extended Enterprise. This optimization seeks to identify actions to undertake to enhance its competitiveness and help it address the difficulties it faces, particularly against powerful suppliers who hold negotiating power, while considering its limited resources and competencies.
What is your perspective on this topic, both in terms of its relevance and the scientific validity of the potential results, and why?
Thank you
Nicolas
Is there a competent body to certify and judge whether a new anti-seismic technology makes a positive contribution or whether it is dangerous?
and chloroformate. But it takes 10 days to compete the reaction. How can I shorten the time of the reaction?
i am trying to clone a lentiviral vector. After the transformation and purification, i see some structural changes where i am not able to digest the lentiviral plasmid with any enzyme. Can someone guide me through the critical step for transformation into a competent E.Coli?
"How do we understand special relativity?"
The Quantum FFF Model differences: What are the main differences of Q-FFFTheory with the standard model? 1, A Fermion repelling- and producing electric dark matter black hole. 2, An electric dark matter black hole splitting Big Bang with a 12x distant symmetric instant entangled raspberry multiverse result, each with copy Lyman Alpha forests. 3, Fermions are real propeller shaped rigid convertible strings with dual spin and also instant multiverse entanglement ( Charge Parity symmetric) . 4, The vacuum is a dense tetrahedral shaped lattice with dual oscillating massless Higgs particles ( dark energy). 5, All particles have consciousness by their instant entanglement relation between 12 copy universes, however, humans have about 500 m.sec retardation to veto an act. ( Benjamin Libet) It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form. Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles. 6 David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave". John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real "Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction. Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum. However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes.
Reply to this discussion
Fred-Rick Schermer added a reply
Abbas Kashani
A lot to work with, Abbas.
However, I am standing in a completely different position, and want to share my work with you. I hope you are interested about this completely distinct perspective.
My claim is that Einstein established a jump that is not allowed, yet everyone followed along.
Einstein and Newton's starting point is the behavior of matter through space. As such, one should find as answer something about the behavior of matter moving through space, and yet Einstein did not do that.
To make the point understandable quickly, Einstein had not yet heard about the Big Bang yet. So, while he devised his special relativity, he actually had not incorporated the most important behavior of matter through space.
Instead, he ended up hanging all behaviors of matter on spacetime. It does not matter that his calculations are correct.
--
Let me find a simple example to show what is going on.
We are doing research on mice in a cage, and after two years we formulated a correct framework that fully captures all possible behaviors of these mice in the cage. That's the setup.
Now comes the mistake:
The conclusion is that the cage controls the mice in their behaviors.
Correctly, we would have said that the mice are in control of themselves, yet the cage restricts them in their behavior. We would not say that the cage controls the mice.
Totally incorrect of course, and yet that is what Einstein did. He established a reality in which matter no longer explains the behavior of matter through space, but made it space (spacetime) that explains the behavior of matter. It is a black&white position that has to be replaced by the correct framework (which is a surprise because it is not based on one aspect, but on both aspects).
--
I know I am writing you from a perspective not often mentioned, and it may not interest you. I'll find out if you are interested in delving deeper into this or not.
Here is an article in which I delve into this matter more deeply:
Article On a Fully Mechanical Explanation of All Behaviors of Matter...
Wolfgang Konle added a reply
"Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum."
Richard Feynman's idea is perfect, and there is no reason to reject it. The existence of vacuum energy, or better dark energy is consistent with Einstein's field equations with a positive cosmological constant.
The energy gain from mass or energy in motion leads to an increasing dark energy density.
The only idea which is missing, is the answer to the question: What happens with the additionally gained energy density?
As an answer to that question I propose the following working hypothese:
This energy is used to recycle star fuel from black holes.
On a first glance, this answer looks as being pure madness, because black holes with their unconvincible gravity seem to be a deposit of matter for eternity.
But in fact there is a plausible possibility. This has to do with the negative energy density of gravitational fields and the non-existence of a negatively definite energy density.
But we need open minded thinking in order to delve deeper into details.
Sergey Shevchenko added a reply
"How do we understand special relativity?"
- the answer to this question, which is really fundamental one, since is about what is some physical theory as a whole; what really means – why and how the postulates of a theory, in this case of the SR, really are formulated, and why and how the postulates
- which in any theory fundamentally – as that happens in mathematics, where axioms fundamentally cannot be proven – aren’t proven; while are formulated only basing on some experimental data, which fundamentally prove nothing, though one experiment that is outside a theory prediction proves that this theory is either wrong, or at least its application is limited.
Returning to the SR, which is based on really first of all four postulates – the SR-1905/1908 versions relativity principle, SR-1905 also on the postulate that light propagates in 3D XYZ space with constant speed of light independently on light source/ an observer’s speeds; and, additionally,
- in both theories it is postulated (i) that fundamentally there exist no absolute Matter’s spacetime, and (ii) - [so] that all/every inertial reference frames are absolutely completely equivalent and legitimate.
In the standard now in mainstream physics SR-1908 additionally to the SR-1905 it is postulated also that observed contraction of moving bodies’ lengths, and slowing down of moving clocks tick rates, comparing with the length and tick rates when bodies and clocks are at rest in “stationary” frames, is caused by the “fundamental relativistic properties and effects”, i.e. “space contraction”, “time dilation”, etc..
Really from yet the (i) and (ii) postulates any number of really senseless consequences completely directly, rigorously, and unambiguously follow, the simplest one is the Dingle objection to the SR;
- from this, by completely rigorous proof by contradiction completely directly, rigorously, and unambiguously it follows , first of all, that
- Matter’s spacetime is absolute, that so some “absolute” frames that are at rest in the absolute 3DXYZ space can exist, while applications, i.e. measurements of distances and time intervals, of moving in the space inertial frames aren’t completely adequate to the objective reality; and
- there exist no the “relativistic properties and effects”.
Etc. However really the SR first of all is based on the indeed extremely mighty Galileo- Poincaré relativity principle.
That is another thing that
- according to SR-1905 relativity principle there is some extremely potent entity “light”, the constancy of which for/by some mystic reasons/ways forces moving bodies to contract and moving clocks to slow down tick rates; and
- the SR 1908 relativity principle is practically omnipotent, so the moving frames, bodies, clocks for/by some mystic reasons/ways really contract/dilate even evidently fundamental space and time.
All that above in the SR really is/are only postulated illusions of the authors, nonetheless, again, the Galileo- Poincaré relativity principle is really . extremely mighty, and the SR indeed in most cases at everyday physical practice is applied in completely accordance with the objective reality. The fundamental flaws of the SR reveal themselves only on fundamental level.
The post is rather long now, so here
Cheers
Sergey Shevchenko added a reply
So let’s continue about what is “special relativity”
In the SS post above it is pointed that Matter’s spacetime is fundamentally absolute, however to say more it is necessary to clarify - what are “space” and “time”, just because of the authors of the SR – and whole mainstream physics till now - fundamentally didn’t/don/t understand what these fundamental phenomena/notions are, the really mystic and simply fundamentally wrong things in the SR were/are introduced in this theory.
What are these phenomena/notions, and what are all other really fundamental phenomena/notions, first of all in this case “Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Information”,
- and “Matter”– and so everything in Matter, i.e. “particles”, “fundamental Nature forces” – and so “fields”, etc., which is/are fundamentally completely transcendent/uncertain/irrational in the mainstream philosophy and sciences, including physics,
- can be, and is, clarified only in framework of the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s philosophical 2007 “The Information as Absolute” conception, and more concretely in physics in the SS&VT Planck scale informational physical model, in this case it is enough to read
More see the link above, here now only note, that, as that is rigorously scientifically rationally shown in the model, Matter absolutely for sure is some informational system of informational patterns/systems – particles, fields, stars, etc., which, as that is shown in the model, is based on a simple binary reversible logics.
So everything that exists and happens in Matter is/are some disturbances in the Matter’s ultimate base – the (at least) [4+4+1]4D dense lattice of primary elementary logical structures – (at least) [4+4+1]4D binary reversible fundamental logical elements [FLE], which [lattice] is placed in the Matter’s fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, fundamentally continuous, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, (at least) [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct); FLE “size” and “FLE binary flip time” are Planck length, lP, and Planck time, tP.
The disturbances are created in the lattice after some the lattice FLE is impacted, with transmission to it, by some non-zero at least 4D space, momentum P[boldmeans 4D vector] in utmost universal Matter’s space with metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z). The impact causes in the lattice sequential FLE-by-FLE flipping, which, since the flipping cannot propagate in the lattice with 4D speed more than the flipping speed c=lP/tP [really at particles creation and motion c√2, more see the link, but that isn’t essential here].
Some FLE flipping above along a direct 4D line can be caused by a practically infinitesimal P impact; but if P isn’t infinitesimal, that causes flipping FLE precession and corresponding propagation of the “FLE-flipping point” in the 4D space above along some 4D helix,
- i.e. causes creation of some close-loop algorithm that cyclically runs on FLE “hardware ” with the helix’s frequency ω, having momentum P=mc above, mis inertial mass, the helix radius is λ=λ/P;
- and the helix’s 4D “ axis” is always directed along P – particles are some “4D gyroscopes”.
The post is rather long already, so now
Sergey Shevchenko added a reply
So let’s continue about what is “special relativity”.
In the SS posts above it is pointed that everything that exists and happens in Matter is/are some disturbances in the Matter’s ultimate base – the (at least) [4+4+1]4D dense lattice of FLEs, which [lattice] is placed in the Matter’s fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, fundamentally continuous, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, spacetime,
- and that happens always in utmost universal “kinematical” Matter’s space with metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z), and corresponding spacetime with metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z ct), where ct is the real time dimension.
At that particles, most of which compose real bodies, at every time moment exist as “FLE –flipping point” that move along some4D helixes that have frequencies ω, having 4D momentums P=mc, m are inertial masses, a helix radius is λ=λ/P;
- and the helix’s 4D “ axis” is always directed along P – particles are some “4D gyroscopes”.
So in Matter there exist two main types of particles – “T-particles”, which are created by momentums that are directed along the cτ-axis [more generally – by 4D momentums cτ-components, but here that isn’t too essential], and so, if are at rest in the 3DXYZ space, move only along cτ-axis with the speed of light, and at that a T- particle’s algorithm ticks with maximal “own frequency”, the particle’s momentum is P0=m0c, where, correspondingly, m0 is the “rest mass”.
If a such T-particle, after some 3D space impact with a 3D space momentum p, moves also in 3D space with a velocity V, having 4D momentum P=P0+p, its speed along the cτ-axis decreases by the Pythagoras theorem in (1-V2/c2)1/2 , i.e. in reverse Lorentz factor,
- and, at that, despite that the helix’s frequency increases, the algorithm is “diluted by “blank” 3D space FLEs flips. So the “own frequency above” decreases in Lorentz factor, so the algorithm ticks slower; and so, say, moving clocks that are some algorithms as well, tick slower in Lorentz factor as well; if a particle algorithm has some defect, and so at every its tick it can break with some probability, so the particle is unstable and decay, such moving in 3D space particles live longer.
Nothing, of course, happens with time, there is no any the SR’s “time dilation”.
The post is rather long already, so now
Cheers
Roggers Waibi added a reply
As proposed by Albert Einstein, Special relativity fundamentally transforms our understanding of space, time, and the nature of reality. At its core, special relativity postulates two key principles: the constancy of the speed of light and the relativity of simultaneity. The former states that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This principle defies common intuition but has been rigorously confirmed by experiments. The latter principle, the relativity of simultaneity, suggests that events that appear simultaneous to one observer may not be simultaneous to another observer in relative motion. Special relativity introduces the concept of spacetime, wherein space and time are intertwined, and observers in relative motion will experience time dilation and length contraction effects. These phenomena have been validated through numerous experiments, such as the famous Michelson-Morley experiment and subsequent tests involving particle accelerators and high-speed particles. Special relativity forms the basis for modern physics, influencing fields ranging from particle physics to cosmology, and challenging our intuitive notions of space and time.
Christian Baumgarten added a reply
Article The Simplest Form of the Lorentz Transformations
Waibi's answer is correct. However, the postulates of SR do not generate understanding. The referenced paper provides evidence that the math underlying SR can mostly be obtained from Hamiltonian notions. Since Hamiltonian concepts are universal in dynamical systems, the mathematical relations of SR are universal as well.
Sergey Shevchenko added a reply
Rather detailed consideration of what the SR is see in series of SS posts in this thread sister https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_do_we_understand_special_relativity/2, pages 1,2;
So here only a few notes to
“…Special relativity introduces the concept of spacetime, wherein space and time are intertwined, and observers in relative motion will experience time dilation and length contraction effects. ..”
- really the concept of spacetime, wherein space and time are intertwined is fundamentally wrong.
Matter’s spacetime is fundamentally unique, fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, fundamentally continuous, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, ( [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct), where all dimensions fundamentally are independent on each other; utmost universal – “kinematic” spacetime has metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z,ct),
- and, of course, fundamentally there cannot be any intertwining of any dimensions, any “time dilations”, “space contraction”, etc.
So that
“….These phenomena have been validated through numerous experiments, such as the famous Michelson-Morley experiment and subsequent tests involving particle accelerators and high-speed particles… “
- really is quite incorrect. No any “intertwining” , “time dilations”, “space contraction” weren’t experimentally observed – that is fundamentally impossible. All what indeed is observed is/are real contraction of moving bodies lengths, slowing tick rates of moving clocks and intrinsic processes rates in unstable particles,
- but bodies aren’t “space” – though, of course are in space; clocks aren’t “time” though, of course tick in time, which [space and time] compose fundamentally only an empty container where everything in Matter exists and changes.
Though that
“….Special relativity forms the basis for modern physics, influencing fields ranging from particle physics to cosmology, and challenging our intuitive notions of space and time…”
- is essentially correct, since the SR is based on the indeed extremely mighty Galileo-Poincaré relativity principle; and so in everyday physical practice the fact that in the SR the relativity principle is absolutized up to absurd/illusory real interactions of particles, bodies, reference frames, etc., with space/time/spacetime is inessential. Again more see the pointed above SS posts in the linked sister thread.
Branko Mišković added a reply
Please read the file uploaded.
… Read more
- 380.76 KBijpsr-1000117.pdf
Opinion Article
Orientation in Space
Branko V. Miskovic
Independent Scientist, Novi Sad, Serbia
Abstract
The position, motion and acceleration of physical objects in the natural laws understand a relevant reference frame. In this sense, the two extreme solutions have been mutually confronted: an absolute cosmic frame or certain equivalence in a class of the frames at least. The imagined formal frames need be connected to evident material bodies. Owing to the complex mutual motions of all celestial bodies, none of them deserves a privileged status. Not only that the vacuum medium is inaccessible by instruments, but its nature and existence are questionable. On the other hand, even the limited equivalence of the formal frames, in the special relativity, does not obey some exceptional technical situations. A few restrictions of relativity in the mechanical and EM processes are here presented. As the synthesis of the two extreme theses, Mach understood a local orientation, in relation to the dominant material surroundings. In the technical practice, such a frame is connected to Earth. The astronomy and astronautics are tacitly referred to the local surroundings, just determined by nearby celestial bodies or their gravitations.
Aim: The solution of one of the crucial questions in physics.
Study design: Comparison and relation of known physical facts.
Methodology: Exhaustive reexamination of these relations.
Study duration: Throughout the author’s working life.
Results: Instead of the absolute or arbitrary orientation, the local preferential frames are finally affirmed and applied.
Keywords: Absolute, Relative, Local, Frame, Motion
Introduction
Physical laws describe the object interactions, in the form of the forces or energies determined by the kinematical quantities. The material bodies or particles, as the objects, represent the concentrated amounts of respective substantial quantities. The static, kinetic and dynamic forces are respectively determined by the positions, motions and accelerations of such objects [1,2]. The three mentioned kinematical quantities need be determined in a relevant reference frame, connected to an evident material body. With respect to the perpetual mutual motions, rotations and revolutions of all celestial bodies, the relevant reference is very questionable. Not only that such a frame is due to determine all the forces and energies, but also the object trajectories. Though theoretically simplest, the absolute reference frame has not been identified. At least approximately, the local technical orientation usually concerns Earth. Even after substitution of the terrestrial by solar orientation, it is not adequate in the wider cosmic space, out of the solar planetary system.
With respect to the limited former sights, the initial problem took the cosmological sense. Irrespective of the physical laws, a comparative body played the role of the cosmic center. In the first view, Earth seemed to be such a center. However, the paths of the other planets in this frame are extremely complex and illogical. Instead of the irregular planetary paths in relation to Earth, their concentric, circular or slightly elliptical orbits around Sun, obeying the three Keppler’s rules, were the bases for reliable formulation of the law of gravitation. On the other hand, such Moon’s orbit around Earth appears similarly complex in relation to Sun. Overlooking this fact, the traumatic transition from the narrower into wider references gave the impression of a great scientific revolution. In the final instance, none of these two references is applicable in the wider cosmic space, pointing to the predominant material surroundings, in the given spatial domain or respective level of observation.
A similar problem appeared in electrodynamics. Though the terrestrial orientation satisfies the usual technical practice, the reference of light propagation in the wider space is problematic. In the aim of confirmation of the expected absolute reference, connected to the rigid vacuum medium, Michelson made the known experiment, proposed by Maxwell. The difference of the two relative speeds of light in the longitudinal and transverse directions in relation to the orbiting Earth had been calculated in advance. However, the negative practical result pointed to the local preferential frame, connected to Earth. With respect to the traumatic Copernican U-turn, this fact has not been noticed nor emphasized. The later more accurate results, in amount of a few percent of the calculated value, have not been explained but are tacitly neglected or even forgotten by the time. Instead of the preferential local frames, the arbitraryorientation is proposed and imposed, as the provisory alternative at least.
In the absence of a unique reliable frame, the attention is paid to the mutual relations between two arbitrary frames, which needed equivalence is expressed by the principle of relativity. However, this principle is strictly satisfied by the static forces only, dependent on mutual distance of two interacting objects (Fig. 1), as the difference of their positions in the two frames. The kinetic force in Ampere’s law depends on the speed product [1], inexpressible by the relativity. Including one speed into the field expression, the relativity concerns mutual motion of the magnet and conductor. The dynamic forces, without the other explicit object, are especially problematic. The relativity must be thus restricted to uniform rectilinear motion. The obtained relations of the distances and times pushed back the orientation itself, and the geometrically expressed gravitation did not at all exceed the restrictions of relativity. The two unresolved problems are thus shadowed by the two useless theories.
Restricted Relativity
With implicit idea of relativity, Newton made the wellknown experiment for checking the needed frame equivalence. Rotating a container with water, he observed the radial forces manifest by the concave water surface. Comparing the stationary and transitional kinematical states, he reliably excluded the force dependence on the container rotation, but referred it to the undetermined wider surroundings. In the absence of the precise answer, he assumed a unique and rigid cosmic frame. Not being theoretically determined nor practically confirmed, this frame is the subject for the further reexamination.
Looking for a better solution, E. Mach asked the known double question. Would the water surface shape be influenced by the more massivecontainer, or even by the rotating cosmos? The former part suggested the hierarchy and fractional sum of more local frames, but latter one expected the equivalence of the two extreme frames, already denied by Newton. However, the known fact calls in question the former thesis at least. The forces acting on its satellites do not depend on the rotation of Earth, as the container carrying their orbits around Sun.
A similar result Faraday obtained in electrodynamics. Rotating a conducting disc in the front of cylindrical magnet, he noticed the kinetic induction [1] between the sliding contacts placed in the center and rim of the disc (Fig. 2). However, the magnet rotation was ineffective at all, so that the common rotation gave the same former result. Touching the magnet by the contacts directly, its conducting body took over the role of the disc, with the same induction. Alike the celestial case, this one does not satisfy the relativity. Unlike the former example, not strictly reconsidered, this one can be explained.
Figure 2. Faraday’s kinetic induction
The relativity here concerns the difference of the kinetic and dynamic inductions (1). The former of them is ascribed to the object motion (v) through the present magnetic field (B).
The speed of the causing electricity is implicitly contained in the field expression. On the other hand, the speed (U) of the field itself determines the dynamic induction.
v × B + B × U = (v – U) × B (1)
However, the objects and domains of appearance of the two inductions essentially distinguish. Unlike the kinetic induction affecting the moving electricity only, dynamic one affects all the present electricity. Moreover, the former induction concerns all the object motion perpendicular to the field, but latter one is also conditioned by the field gradient [1]:
∇ × E = U · ∇B = – ∂B/∂t (2)
Figure 3. Kinetic and dynamic inductions
Figure 3 compares the two EM inductions. The current in the central conductor is followed by the circular magnetic field. The transverse motion of a parallel or perpendicular object conductor causes the kinetic induction. Such motion of the carrier, along the field gradient, causes the dynamic induction in the parallel objects only. In the transverse (or circular directions Fig. 2), the field gradient equals to naught. Similar relation may be ascribed to the gravitation on the celestial orbits. The field rotations transverse to their gradients are irrelevant.
Light Propagation
All waves, from the mechanical, via sound up to EM ones, as the medium disturbances, propagate at the speeds determined by the elasticity and inertia of respective media [1]. Unlike the former two waves, concerning matter consisting of the particles, the last wave type also propagates through the vacuum medium. Though not explain this medium, the waves demand its existence. The addition of matter, increasing the medium density, causes the slower propagation. The explanations of various physical forces [2] finally rely on respective media. Though light consists of photons, as the energetic particles, it propagates at the wave speed, determined by Maxwell’s relation (9b). The negation of vacuum medium – by special relativity, does not offer any other explanation of the above phenomena. The propagation of each disturbance is referred to the medium, irrespective of motion of passive observers or their instruments.
The same speed of light relative to the moving devices, or to their formal frames and passive observers, cannot be understood nor explained. Michelson’s result, just being referred to Earth, can be generalized to the other celestial bodies, but not at all to the arbitrary (inertial) frames. Apart from such the exaggerated generalization of the result, this opinion may be also conditioned by some cosmic relations [3]. Owing to the cosmic expansion, two bodies are mutually moving away at the speed (v) proportional with their distance. Despite this fact, the light starts from its emitter, propagates through space and arrives to the detector at the same speed (c) – relative to the local surroundings. In fact, it propagates accelerating in relation to both mentioned devices: from the speed c up to c + v, or from c – v up to c, respectively. The apparent difficulty is thus exceeded.
Doppler’s effects, at motion of the signal emitter or detector (3), respectively, strictly obey the frames connected to the local media. The ratios of the propagated and emitted frequencies – in the former, or of the detected and propagatedones – in latter cases, accord with the ratios of respective speed pairs [3]. If the two relative speeds, (c – u) & (c – v), were equal to the absolute one (c), these two effects could not arise. At common motion of the two devices, the two effects compensate each other, with the detected equal to emitted frequencies. The same result arises at opposite motion of the medium, irrespective of the propagation itself corrected for the medium speed.
wc/wu = c/(c – u) wv/wc = (c – v)/c (3)
However, at light propagating through running water Fizeau obtained the result (4), dependent on the factor k, as the ratio of the material and total field components [1,2]. Apart from the slower propagation, the frame is drawn in the direction (v) of the water flow, as the moving material stratum.
c = co/er + kv k = P/D = 1 – 1/er (4)
The similar Faraday’s effect, twisting the polarization of light propagating along magnetic field lines, is caused by circulation of the static (F), in the form of kinetic (A) potentials. The former of them plays the role of the moving stratum.
A = emVF ∇·A = – em∂F/∂t (5)
The factor of the frame draw in the cosmic space may be similarly determined. Apart from the slower propagation in the present gravitation, the frame draw is determined by the ratio of the moving and dominant potentials.
Though applied in practice, the direct negation of the arbitrary orientation by Sagnac’s effect is ignored in the theory. Namely, two opposite light beams, propagating along the perimeter of a rotating figure, give the evident phase difference, according to the different relative speeds of light. This effect is multiplied by application of a solenoidal light conductor, instead of the figure perimeter. Such device is applied for registration of the angular airplane deviation, instead of the mechanical gyroscope. The references of the observer, in a resting laboratory or the rotating airplane, do not at all influence the result. This practical argument exceeds all the alleged relativistic proofs.
Transformations
The kinetic and dynamic inductions (1) added to the central static field [1] give the summary field around a moving charge (6). The longitudinal speed (V= v) of electric, and transverse (U) – of magnetic fields, obey the principle of relativity [1]. Alike the static field – at rest (E), the summary result (E’) is also centrally symmetric, tending to naught approaching the speed of light propagation. Apart from the magnetic field not affecting resting objects, the axial dynamic induction – subtracted from the radial static field, gives the ellipsoidal result.
E’ = E + (v – U) × B = (1 – emu2)E (6)
Missing the dynamic induction or understanding the object-field motion (u= v – U), H. A Lorentz formulated the summary force (7a). Expecting the similar and paralel magnetic phenomena [1], the symmetric magnetic relation was understood (7b), with the opposite mutual motion of magnetic poles and electric field. In fact, these two equations express the same relations, with the two equal and opposite mutual speeds. Not only that the free magnetic poles do not exist [1], but the field actions on the magnetic moments are essentially distinct. Apart from the former conditionalequation, latter one is fictional.
E’ = E + u × B B’ = B + emE × u (7)
The inverted set (8,9) exchanges the causes and effects. The opposite motion of the frame is understood. The set determinant (8b), as the factor (6) restricted to the transverse plane, points to the privileged frame, connected to the medium. For the sake of the frame equivalence adopted in advance, this value is arbitrarily distributed between the two sets: by 1/g in each of them. The formal inversion only is thus kept.
E = (E’ – u × B’)/g2 g2= 1 – emu2 (8)
B = (B’ – emE’× u)/g2 em = 1/c2 (9)
This action implies the explicit negation of vacuum medium at least. To push back the media, the product of the two constants is usually substituted by the speed c (9b).
By the factor distribution, the transverse field components (7) are arbitrarily increased, calling in question the mathematical form of Maxwell’s equations. Owing to their huge authority, the problem has been avoided by the complementary deformations of the two remaining 4D axes, longitudinal and temporalones!! (10). The former relation divides the position transformation (Fig. 4) by the factor g less from unit, but latter one also transforms the time. Owing to the limited relativity, these transformations are restricted to the uniform rectilinear speed u, in relation to the still unknown relevant reference frame!
x’ = (x – ut)/g t’ = (t – ux/c2)/ g (10)
Figure 4. The position transformation
The equations (10) somehow distinguish lengths and times in the two frames, depending on their mutual motion. Not only that this dependence cannot be physically explained, but lengths and times would depend on the speed, as their ratio! Moreover, the lengths depend on a given time beginning, as well as times – on the adopted frame position. Unlike the time possibly calculated from the frame overlap, the position of a chosen frame cannot be referred to any privileged location. The relative time, dependent on the object position – in the arbitrary frame, is undetermined!! Not only that the reference frames are arbitrary, but represent the mere mental constructs. There is not any logic by which their mutual motion can influence lengths and times, irrespective of any motion of the passive observers.
The ratio of the two equations (10) gives the relativistic speed transformation (11). Here v & v’ denote the object speeds in the two frames, and u – their mutual motion. The usual speed difference is here divided by the nominator less from unit, thus being artificially increased. Applied to light – as the object, this equation turns into the identity: c’ = c. Following through the sequence of inconsistencies, this is the pretext for the same speed of light at all (inertial) frames. This opinion is here already denied by the sequence of empirical facts.
v’ = x’/t’ = (v – u)/(1 – vu/c2) (11)
Avoiding or exceeding all these speculations, Hobble’s ratio of the distance and speed at the mutual motion away of two celestial bodies just understands the unique cosmic time. Some local times, deviating from the absolute one, are theoretically inconceivable and practically impossible. The real transformation of the position (Fig. 4), concerning the absolute time, is the only acceptable alternative. Namely, the positions of an object in the two frames differ no more or less but for the mutual distance covered after the initial frame overlap. In the unique space and time, this is the only reasonable relation.
General Relativity
Despite the sequence of formal inconsistencies above clearly presented, the restriction to a uniform rectilinear motion is the unique declared difficulty of special relativity. Alike inertia being generalized to the force action, Einstein tried to generalize his special to general theories. After some wander through chaotic speculations, he lost from view the initial problem. Owing to the kinetic and dynamic forces out of relativity, he returned to the static laws. On the basis of their possible balance, inertia is reduced to gravitation!? The radial field around a body is copied into the super-spherical space, along t-axis.
Alike gravitation projected on a slope, it itself is thus treated as the similar projection of some super-force acting from the cosmic center (Fig. 5). The field around a body is illustrated by the spatial curvature, as the local deformation of space, in the form of the funnel. At the interstellar space of the regular spatial curvature, such the projection equals to naught.
Figure 5. Local and global curvatures
Without any valid criteria, this concept is widely taken as the theory of gravitation. In the equivalent form, it speaks nothing about the essence of gravitation, but only further mystifies this phenomenon. If the formal mistakes and/or inconsistencies be excluded, there is no any reason by which its results will differ from the classical ones. At least accidentally, this analogy announces the radial cosmic expansion along temporal axis [3], irrespective of the red shift lately noticed.
Albert Einstein
In these times failing in the authorities of any kind, Einstein is an unquestionable scientific authority, if not in general, then in the modern physics at least. Instead of the resort to the praise, a brief and unbiased, as much as possible adequate valorization of his scientific contributions need be here presented. Avoiding unnecessary repetitions, the arguments rely on the above text and its references, also having in view the scientific criteria. Unlike majority of the other scientists, being famous concerning their unquestionable contributions, Einstein is celebrated with respect to his controversial views.
Apart from the photo-electric effect, Einstein deserved the leading position by the three ideas at least: the fourth dimension, curvilinear space and equation: w = mc2. Although the former two ideas were not originally his, Einstein emphasized and affirmed them self-confidentially. The indirect and complicated derivation of his equation seems to be accidental, resulted from the random formal procedures. Apart from the considerable simplification of this derivation, a direct its inference has been also presented in [2]. Not only that this equation is thus affirmed, but its convincing interpretation is finally enabled.
Unfortunately, none of the three mentioned ideas or results had been fully elaborated and applied by Einstein. At least in principle, the fourth axis is directly colliding with relative time. According to the tensor form of Maxwell’s equations [1], time is a real metrical axis. The probable restriction of the medium of light to the spatial gravitation excludes its temporal propagation. The relative time calls in questions its physical sense and reality. Not only that this concept is fantastic and arbitrary, but cannot be argued by any physical reason. At least some of its contradictions are here already clearly presented.
The idea of curvilinear cosmic space has been also unfinished. Though the Riemannian frame excludes the surrounding cosmic background [3], the modern cosmologists understand it. Even the surrounding cosmoses are expected in the background thus tacitly predicted. This inconsistency of the followers, not trying to finalize Einstein’s principal ideas, may be understood: the famous authorities would not make logical mistakes or give incomplete ideas. His equation has not been interpreted so far. Instead of its undefined application, it can be ascribed to the massive particles, unlike similar Plank’s relation for photons.
At least a part of Einstein’s fame relies on the arbitrary spatial orientation, as the main his failure. It implies the same speeds of light at all so called inertial reference frames, declared equivalent by the principle of relativity. Without sufficient vision of physical processes, as the corrective criterion, the formal calculations are prone to various mistakes or inconsistencies. In the final instance, the relativities of lengths and times are unacceptable at all. As the needed condition for these views, the vacuum medium had been explicitly negated. Imposed by the authority, this view still hinders the further development.
Let us also emphasize some Einstein’s methodological errors, mainly reducible to typical inconsistencies. Such is the arbitrary substitution of two similar math expressions by their geometric average. The average of two Doppler’s effects he applied to the cosmic red shift of light [3]. The opposite signs in the two field tensors he substituted by the imaginary unit [1]. In the opposite sense, the set determinant (8b) has been distributed between the two sets. The parallel EM phenomena (7b) were already understood. By the explicit negation of the medium, Einstein imposed the kinematical relativity.
The incomplete or doubtful principal views may be added. Apart from the static interactions, the relativity can be applied to the special cases of some distinct forces. Concerning two Mach’s ideas, Einstein chose the frame equivalence as the worst one. The unexplained kinetic induction was neglected. The lengths and times dependent on the moving observers fail in any explanation. The dependence of the relative time on the adopted spatial frame has not been noticed even by the numerous opponents!? The wide acceptance of relativity is not strictly founded, but imposed in the absence of the competent critiques.
By mess of the notions, Einstein confused the opponents. He substituted the two EM constants by the abstract speed of light, thus pushing back a vacuum medium at least. The absolute light propagation through the medium, irrespective of the instruments and observers, he substituted by the invariant relative speed. The temporal cosmic process, independent of the transverse spatial motion [3], he ascribed to the light propagation in a given spatial direction. The same speeds of light in the local cosmic situations imposed the additional confusion. All these facts taken together made the full mess in the theory.
Substitution of some theses is also frequent. The ellipsoidal electric field deformation around a moving charge, caused by the longitudinal dynamic induction [1], he ascribed to the increased transverse fields, by distribution of the factor g. The incomplete medium draw by the running water he ascribed to the relativistic speed transformation. Instead of the stronger structural stability, the shorter lives of speedy mesons are ascribed to the relative time. The two former cases at least do not obey the numerical relations. In the final instance, there cannot be even enumerate all Einstein’s inconsistencies.
Results
The relativity, as a postulate, is valid for the static forces only. Owing to various reasons, it cannot be applied to the kinetic and dynamic processes. The relativities of distinct physical forces are restricted to the special technical situations.
The same speed of light in a class of the frames, implied by the relativity principle and additional inconsistencies, cannot be anyhow understood nor explained. The generalization of the local to arbitrary orientation is exaggerated.
A sequence of the wave effects somehow contradicts to the relativistic views. At least one of them directly denies the arbitrary orientation of light. The navigational system (GPS) could not take into account the relativistic views.
The relativistic transformations are founded on the sequence of theoretical mistakes and inconsistencies. The dependence of the relative time on the adopted spatial frame is especially unacceptable and must be refuted forever.
Imposing relativity of lengths and times, the special theory lost from view the orientation. Reducing gravitation to geometry, the general theory did not generalize special one. These two theories only mystify the physical relations.
Not only that the restriction to so called inertial frames has not been exceeded, but its definition understands in advance a relevant reference frame. Going into the opposite direction, this opinion terminates in the local orientation.
Starting from the unique (absolute) reference – as the thesis, and arbitrary orientation – as antithesis, Mach’s local orientation in relation to the predominant material surroundings – as the synthesis, satisfies all the practical situations.
Conclusion
Between Earth and Sun, Copernicus chose the latter referent body. Newton similarly preferred the wider surroundings to the water container. Amongst the two Mach’s theses, of the local or arbitrary orientation, Einstein took the latter one. Not only that the orientation is thus overlooked, but disabled. The remaining local orientation, relative to a dominant mass, with some draw of the frame by other masses, satisfies all the practical situations. Although the rotation of Earth does not influence the satellites, its revolution firmly carries their orbits around Sun.
References
1. Miskovic BV. Foundation of Electrodynamics. Int J Phys Stud Res. 2023; 4(1): 98-103. doi: 10.18689/ijpsr-1000116
2. Miskovic BV. Unity of Physics. Int J of Theor and Math Physics. 2024; 2(1).
3. Miskovic BV. Curvilinear Cosmology. Int J Cosmol Astron Astrophysics. 2023; 5(2): 231-236. doi: 10.18689/ijcaa-1000143
4. Mišković B. A Brief Review of Special Relativity. Int J of Theor and Math Physics. 2019; 9(2): 36-40. doi: 10.5923/j.ijtmp-20190902.02
Hi.
I am currently validating a measure on public mental illness stigma in the workforce , and have found a relatively high correlation between the two constructs: “work-related beliefs/competency” and “responsibility for having a mental illness“ and also the two constructs “work-related beliefs/competency” and “perceptions of dangerousness and unpredictability“
I am probably just not good enough to search or smart enough, but I cannot find any previous research on this relationship or any theories that can help me explain my explain this relationship. Anyone who can be off assistance?
What is the minimal education competency for use of insulin engineered safety needles
Dear research community,
I would like to move forward with a toy startup based in South Australia or the Northern Territory and am looking for a potential co-founder with industrial design competencies.
Since the startup should be essentially based on utilising research principles, I would prefer co-founders from the academic community.
Please let me know if you are interested or have any tips.
Thanks and best,
Tim
I am writing to let you know that Journal of E-Learning And Knowledge Society (SCOPUS Q2, SJR Q3) is currently welcoming submissions of original research to "VOLUME 20 | SPECIAL ISSUE CALL 2024" with title “Digital Transformation in Educational Research: Competencies, Resources and Challenges in the Context of ICT”. As the Guest Editor of this CfP, I hope you will consider this as an outlet for a future research paper.
As a result of these reflections, different questions arise.
• Are teachers digitally trained in research skills?
• What skills do teachers have to use digital resources developed for the research context?
• What factors influence the digital competencies of teachers in their research work?
• How do AI tools impact the digital skills of teachers in research work?
For this reason, we welcome studies that cover topics related to:
• digital skills in research work;
• analysis of the use of digital resources and AI tools for the research process;
• factors incident to the digital competencies associated with the research process;
• infrastructure of university institutions on digital resources for the research process.
What do you do if your educational technology startup is struggling to compete in today's market?
Cities compete with each other in a globalised environment. How does this affect the design of urban space and the community?
Colleagues #question, or rather three questions that have been tormenting me for many months and even preventing me from sleeping. Maybe you can answer them:
#1. Do creative people (artists, writers, sculptors, etc.) have entrepreneurial competencies?
#2. Do they need them or not in their professional career?
#3. Do they use them or not? The answers are simple: 1-yes or no, 2-yes or no, 3-yes or no. Can you please answer, it’s very, very important.
Why contemporary art business conditions should change the meaning/importance of entrepreneurial competences?
"I am conducting advanced research to determine the extent of the influence of a church leader's competence on religious moderation."
Are current scientific views propped up by censorship of competing ideas and mutual complacency?
I am asking this controversial question because I cannot get a single astronomer, physicist, cosmologist, or astrophysicist to take the other side of my arguments.
I hope some of the outstanding scientists here will accept to talk shop.
I made a special request to Dr. Brian Keating.

I am looking for study participants who are instructional designers, business faculty, and business experts.
Dear colleague, I am looking for assessment tools for Military Leadership Style and Competences. However, I am finding difficult to get information on the same. Can anyone help me?
Thanks in anticipation.
How do creative and critical thinking affects the development of 21st-century competencies?
Hi, I have to perform a ligation reaction between a PCR fragment and a plasmid, in order to transform competent E. coli strain to amplify the plasmid. I will also make a gel to check the correct size of the plasmid+insert.
Is it possible to purify the plasmid DNA with a kit from the reaction where I performed the ligation reaction, and then transform my E. coli cells, or I have to purify it from the gel? I would like to skip the step of purification of the plasmid from the gel, if possible.
Thank you for your help.
Dear colleagues,
According to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Chapter 12, Article 60, especially 60.3 entitled "Junior homonyms without synonyms"), the substitutes for homonymous names lacking valid synonyms, are designated with the new “author name” and a “new date”
A representative example is the following paper:
Kittel, R.N. 2016. Eighty-nine Replacement Names for Braconidae and Ichneumonidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 22 (2): 161–174.
I believe this approach is not logical. Those who describe a new taxon, such as a genus or species, invest considerable effort in specimen collection, taxon study, proving the novelty of the taxon, taxon description, illustration, identification key, and distinguishing it from closely related taxa. Moreover, during the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, communication systems and the availability of scientific publications were not as advanced as they are today. Therefore, some of the scientific names become homonymous, especially at the species level.
Article 60.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-code-online) is as follows:
60.3. Junior homonyms without synonyms
If the rejected junior homonym has no known available and potentially valid synonym it must be replaced by a new substitute name, with its own author and date; this name will then compete for priority with any synonym recognized later.
It simply dedicated an authorship to someone who simply suggested the new name. Do you find this article logical?
What is your opinion on this matter?
Kind regards,
Ali Asghar Talebi
p.s.: I mentioned Dr. Kittel's paper as an example, and I know that she is a distinguished expert on the systematic of Ichneumonoidea.
As there is globalisation and the digital revolution in every aspect of future learners who are so-called new millennium learners, how the Innovative Learning Environments fulfil the purpose. Also, there is a need to look into the well-being of the learners and how the pedagogy and curriculum can be designed for the community needs of every learner.
If you are a teacher/educator/instructor, please answer or share this question.
Are there any specific characteristics or competencies that you truly love to obtain?
Greetings, fellow researchers and industry enthusiasts,
Are you intrigued by the potential of Skill-Based NFTs in revolutionizing industries? I'm passionate about exploring this transformative concept and seeking like-minded collaborators to dive into its possibilities.
My Expertise: I specialize in Blockchain Development, Industry Insight, Tokenomics and Economics, AI and Data Science, Legal and Compliance, User Experience (UX) and Design, Collaboration and Project Management and hold PhD in Computer Engineering. I'm driven to innovate and leverage Skill-Based NFTs to elevate industries through cutting-edge technology.
The Vision: Imagine a future where industries harness the power of NFTs to represent skills, competencies, and professional achievements. I'm eager to assemble a collaborative team to explore and develop this vision further.
Collaboration Opportunities: I'm open to various collaboration avenues, such as: • Joint research initiatives • Co-creating innovative NFT solutions • Sharing insights, resources, and expertise • Mentorship and support for passionate individuals in this realm
Get in Touch: If you're engaged in NFTs, industry transformation, or simply excited about shaping the future of skills representation, let's connect! Reach out to me at henry@elu.nl to explore potential collaborations or discuss ideas.
Let's unite our expertise, ignite innovation, and create impactful Skill-Based NFT solutions for industries. I'm eager to embark on this journey together.
Warm regards,
Henry Ukwu, PhD
My scrutinizing the literature on MS for decades failed to spot any concrete archetypal or milestone documents or the results of some topical statistical investigation that might support at least one of the repeatedly updated clinical definitions of the disease.
Isn't there some expert in neurology, neuropathology, or the history or philosophy of medicine who feels competent to explain, even lend some helping hand for overcoming, this conceptual deficit?
What justifies the characterization of MS in terms of neurological disorders being disseminated in space and in time?
Dear colleaques
I have a problem with cloning of my PCR product (829 bp) into pET101 TOPO vector (5753 bp) by Invitrogen™ Champion™ pET101 Directional TOPO™ Expression Kit. I performed a PCR reaction to obtain my product, which I purified from the gel. The forward primer contains the CACC sequence as recommended. For PCR reaction I use Phusion Plus DNA polymerase whitch generates blunt ends. I got strong band with corect size and purified my DNA by Nucleospin kit. The concentration of my PCR product was 35,2 ng/ul.
For cloning reaction I follow the instructions in manual. It is important to use 0,5:1 to 2:1 molar ratio of PCR product:TOPO vector. So if I used 1 ul of vector (15-20 ng) I dilute my PCR product to concentration 3,52 ng/ul and add 0,82 ul of them into the cloning reaction (molar ratio 1:1) and incubated for 5 min (first time and 20 min second time with the same results). As control I used reaction only with vector (without PCR product). With reactions I transform One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent E. coli and incubated on the agar plates with ampicilin (100ug/ml) owernight at 37°C. But the results were the same on both plates, where I got hundreds of colonies.
Then I took some 20 colonies and used them as templat in control PCR wth the same primers which I used at the beginning of the process. Reasults were negativ. This was also confirmed by restriction analysis after DNA isolation (miniprep).
Where could be mistake? Thank you very much for any advice.

May I get some recommendations and Literature?
So I am currently titrating a ligand (A, 12 µM) which is a dimer (in syringe) to a monomeric protein in cell (B, 61 µM). The experimental conditions are 20 mM Sodium Phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, and 2 mM TCEP at 20 C. I observe reasonable heat change after titration but the stoichiometry is consistently lower than 1. Though on the literature, I have observed a N~1 for the same binding proteins (though the titrations are done in reverse orientation).
I believe it is due to the low C value that I am not observing a sigmoidal binding curve. Unfortunately, I am limited by protein and can not further increase the concentration without precipitation of my protein. the
Would a low N value mean only a fraction of my protein in the cell are binding competent/active? If so is there any way to diagnose using any other method and correct it? Below are the attached thermograms and binding isotherm for more clarity.
Thank you.

What is entrepreneurship competence for people? Can we build a entreprenuership competence framework for people, for students? Can we train this competecnce for students?
- Observational Analysis: Researchers observe and record conversations to study how individuals from diverse linguistic backgrounds interact.
- Transcription: Spoken language is transcribed into written form for detailed analysis, including pronunciation, intonation, and pauses.
- Coding and Categorization: Linguistic patterns and sociolinguistic variables are identified in transcripts, such as code-switching and language choices.
- Quantitative Analysis: Statistical techniques may quantify sociolinguistic phenomena like code-switching frequency or linguistic feature distribution.
- Qualitative Analysis: Researchers explore the meaning and context behind linguistic behaviors and language choices.
- Questionnaires and Surveys: Self-reported data from participants, including language preferences and attitudes toward languages, can be collected.
- Corpus Linguistics: Large collections of texts or spoken data are analyzed to uncover linguistic patterns.
- Experimental Studies: Researchers design experiments to manipulate variables related to peer interactions and sociolinguistic competence.
- Interviews: Semi-structured interviews provide insights into participants' experiences and perceptions.
- Audio and Video Recordings: Recordings capture spoken and nonverbal aspects of communication, such as gestures and facial expressions.
I have AGL1 agrobacterium, it's not competent. i need to do it competent. any recommended protocols. i tried the TSS we use for E.coli but not working. also i tried the cacl2 protocol and don't get the +ve colonies in transfromation.
thanks
Specifically, general education teachers' competence in identifying and assessing disability in an mainstream setting. Thank you so much.
can you have a recent study about competency acquisition in home econmics
Practical skills
and Suggest activities to enhance competencies acquisition and Practical skills through utilization in home economics.
"The value of a degree is in its RELIABILITY: when ill in a foreign country you can bet the MD has minimal competence. Like a driver's license.
HUMANITIES/SOCIAL SCIENCE degrees offer no reliability.
If you don't know what you get, degrees are worthless.
The market punishes BS"(Taleb 2018).
In this study I wanted to find out what factors that can be change milk yield of dairy farmers and do farmer’s attitudes, skills on farming, knowledge on farming relate with yield of milk production in cows. Further, living environment of the animals and nutrition of animals relate with milk production of cows.
The farmers’ attitudes can be affecting the way farmers treat their animals and it could be affecting the milk production. This study is focusing this context as we could be improving our milk production with the resource available with our farmers if their attitudes are contributing to milk production.
The Metropolitan Autonomous University, Iztapalapa Unit, is seeking professionals with a doctorate degree 🎓 to compete for Full-Time Visiting Professor positions in the area of Chemical Engineering.
🔥 You will have the opportunity to compete for a permanent, full-time and open-ended position through a competitive examination 🏆. 🚀
Check out the convocation document! 👇👇👇👇
Catano, V. M., Darr, W., & Campbell, C. A. (2007). Performance appraisal of behavior based
competencies: a reliable and valid procedure. Personnel Psychology, 60(1),
201-230
According to M. Fountopoulou, the 21st century teacher needs powerful tools and techniques for developing and cultivating personal skills, which are both exciting and significantly relevant:
- connecting theory with practice, - medium and long-term view of learning and teaching
- evaluation of the information
- the transformation of knowledge, the - - - the management of the school unit
- the combined application of scientific and pedagogical principles
"The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong" is a satirical book written by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull, published in 1969. The book presents a humorous and thought-provoking perspective on organizational dynamics and the challenges that arise when individuals are promoted to positions of incompetence. The central thesis of the book is the Peter Principle itself, which suggests that people in a hierarchical organization tend to be promoted to their level of incompetence.
Here's a summary of the key ideas and concepts explored in the book:
- The Peter Principle: The authors propose that in a hierarchical organization, employees are promoted based on their performance in their current roles. However, as they continue to excel, they eventually reach a point where they are promoted to positions that require skills, competencies, or expertise different from what they have demonstrated. This results in individuals functioning at a level where they are no longer effective due to their incompetence in the new role.
- Incompetence and Promotion: The book humorously discusses how the process of promotion can lead to a cycle of incompetence. Individuals who perform well in their current roles are rewarded with promotions, which continue until they reach a position where they are no longer successful due to a lack of relevant skills or abilities.
- Humorous Examples: The authors use entertaining anecdotes and case studies to illustrate the Peter Principle in action. These examples demonstrate situations where employees with specific skills are promoted into roles where those skills are no longer relevant.
- Hierarchy and Bureaucracy: The book critiques hierarchical organizational structures and the bureaucratic nature of promotions. It highlights the tendency for promotions to be based on previous achievements rather than future potential.
- Impact on Organizations: The authors explore the consequences of the Peter Principle on organizational efficiency, effectiveness, and morale. They suggest that this phenomenon can lead to inefficiencies, mismanagement, and frustration among employees.
- Suggestions for Improvement: While the book is primarily satirical, it does offer some lighthearted suggestions for addressing the issues raised by the Peter Principle. These include promoting employees randomly, promoting only those who show incompetence in their current roles, or encouraging a culture of lateral movement instead of upward mobility.
- Satirical Tone: "The Peter Principle" uses a witty and satirical tone to highlight the absurdity of organizational practices. It pokes fun at the idea that people are promoted to positions for which they are ill-suited, creating situations that can lead to comical or frustrating outcomes.
- Reflection on Human Nature: The book invites readers to reflect on the nature of human competence, the challenges of organizational management, and the ways in which well-intentioned systems can sometimes lead to unintended consequences.
Overall, "The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong" is a humorous exploration of organizational dynamics and human behavior within hierarchical structures. While it should be read with a sense of satire, it offers insights into the complexities of promotions, leadership, and competence within organizations.
What is peter principle in management ?
The Peter principle states that a person who is competent at their job will earn a promotion to a position that requires different skills. If the promoted person lacks the skills required for the new role, they will be incompetent at the new level, and will not be promoted again. If the person is competent in the new role, they will be promoted again and will continue to be promoted until reaching a level at which they are incompetent. Being incompetent, the individual will not qualify for promotion again, and so will remain stuck at this final placement or Peter's plateau.
Hello Science community,
I am working with several Agrobacterium strains (GV3101 pMP90, GV3101 pMP90 & EHA105). All of these strains are sensitive to the expected antibiotics when using only glycerol stocks of the strains for inoculation of solid and liquid media. However, after I made them chemically competent for transformation, the selection of the strains no longer works.
I have repeated the competenting with freshly made solutions to rule out contamination and changed the antibiotics used, but the problem remains the same.
Perhaps someone of you can give me an explanation?
- I have been preparing competent dh5alpha cells in the lab with good competency not excellent. however, have not been able to transform my CRISPR plasmid yet. I am following all the desired steps still unable to attain the correct colonies. plz, throw some light where I can be making mistakes. Plasmid is from addgene (pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0)
What is education for sustainable development competencies?
Where i should add the following in the manuscript file?
(1) Competing Interests
(2) Author's contribution statement
(3) Ethical and informed consent for data used.
You need to make high level practically actionable proposal that will help RMG industry create a collaborative culture of ‘competing together rather than
competing with each other’ among the various supply chain stakeholders.
Essentially i am looking for material on the debate between the need for a PHD in higher education vs the competencies of other sorts of practitioners/educators/teachers.
Who is the ideal learner? Is it the learner who works hard and memorizes everything he is responsible for in the exam and gets high grades, or the one who can't get high grades in the exam because he doesn't have the ability to memorize, but has creative, critical and analytical thinking competence?
What makes parents want to control their grown-up children even when they are competent professionals
I am in the process of conduction my dissertation research at Liberty University and would appreciate being able to utilize Professor "César Leal-Costa's" developed instrument for nursing communication competency. Does anyone know how I may contact him to procure written permission to be able to use it? I would greatly appreciate any assistance
Thank you
Pat
Overtime, there have been many methods , approaches and strategies being used and adopted in the teaching and learning of English Language ranging from grammar method, audio-visual, communicative competence teaching , etc.
However, most of these approaches, strategies and methods are usually being referred to as being traditional or something, significantly at the advent of technological advancements and information-driven economy.
There have been many new methods, approaches and strategies infused with technology principles and practicals in the 21st century.
Kindly tell me the ones that you know or have applied before or have read about before.
Thank you for you for your time and help.
What is the disparity between emotional intelligence and emotional competence?
I am currently working with a study titled "Knowledge, Competency, Adoptability and Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology Among Physician Entrepreneurs in GCC Countries". I am in dilemma that which SEM model AMOS/SmartPLS will suit for the study. The total responses received so far is 220 out of the population size of 400. The main objective is to find out knowledge , competency, adoptability and sustainability of Artificial intelligence among Physician entrepreneurs.
I will be much thankful to you, if you can extend your kind feedback on this.
Regards
Dr.Sharfras Navas
For my Ph.D. project, I am looking for the attitudes and practices of EFL teachers and students towards peer review in enhancing strategic competence. The aims to investigate the attitudes and practices of EFL teachers and students towards peer review in enhancing strategic competence in selected secondary schools.
please dear share your idea to concerns,
Thank you very much.
Hello, Respected researchers. What theoretical framework could be appropriate for a teachers‘ perception study regarding the application of AI in the evaluation of teachers' competence?
I have to perform the genomic integration of a gene, would it be better to use E.coli cells made competent by chemical method or by electroporation?
Thank you
Which type of pulmonary medicine competencies are included in undergraduate training of medical students in your medical school.
key skills and competencies
successful tourism internships
I am doing a paper study on movement competency and need resources to be cited and as resources too.
ACM and IEEE-CS Release Computing Curricula 2020, Global Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degrees in Computing. The Association for Computing Machinery and the IEEE Computer Society have issued Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Global Computing Education. Developed by a 50-member task force drawn from 20 countries, CC2020 outlines international recommendations for baccalaureate degrees in computing.
CC2020 is designed to be comprehensive, delineating the latest curricula for computing disciplines including computer engineering, computer science, information systems, information technology, and software engineering. CC2020 builds upon a CC2005 report by including new disciplines such as cybersecurity and data science, as well as other significant “add-ons” to reflect the changing dynamics of computing, computing education research, and the workplace. These additions include:
- Transitioning from knowledge-based learning to competency-based learning
- Expanding curricular and competency diagrams and visualizations
- Establishing an interactive website that will bring CC2020 results to public use
- Charting a framework for future curricular activities
“A key theme of the CC2020 report is that students must have the requisite knowledge and skills but that their education must go beyond these important building blocks to foster competencies.”
source: ACM and IEEE-CS Release Computing Curricula 2020, Global Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degrees in Computing
Which models/frameworks are people using for curriculum evaluation?
Do you think employees who THINK that they are more competent will be more engaged in their work, or less? Or this perception will not have any influence on their engagement?
Does anyone have access to a PDF version/link for Berlin questionnaire for competence assessment in EBM?
I`m conducting a Ph.D. dissertation and looking forward to identifying the effectiveness of Web 3.0 in developing EFL teaching competencies.
I have a group of 16 students in my sample. 14 students evaluated themselves (anonymously) on 24 competencies prior to an intervention. Following the intervention, 12 students evaluated themselves (again, anonymously) on the same set of competencies. Because I can't compare each individual's pre and post score, I want to compare the means of each of the competency self-evaluation scores, pre and post. I can't figure out what to do.
From various research, the aspect of competencies is viewed from the 4 Cs: communication. Cooperation, creativity and collaboration. The issue from my point of view is, do you consider entrepreneurship and innovative competencies as important factors for the 21st-century world of work and businesses? If these two competencies are important, what are their similarities and differences as compared to the 4 cs
SMEs need to build its resilience to survive in turbulent times. Identifying core competencies and factors that build resilience are challenging for SMEs. The question persists, what makes SMEs resilient in turbulent times?
There is a trouble for me that when I was purified the antibody the rat's Fc included using protein G, but I want to keep the activity of the antibody, so I want to using another antibody mouse' Fc included to compete with the rat's Fc antibody to get the free antibody with rat's Fc, does this idea available?
I work with a thermophilic enzyme, its optimal temperature is 50 C. From some assays at 50 C and at 35 C, I was able to construct two lineweaver burke plots.
I want to ask you if my interpretation and understanding sounds correct. Comparing the Km/Vmax from either set, it appears that 35 C is a better temperature for activity. However, this enzyme experiences strong product inhibition and the higher temperature must be beneficial in reducing inhibition.
So....higher temperature = more energy = less binding efficiency = greater Km at 50 C ?
Since the product competes for binding to the active site, by reducing binding efficiency the exchange rate of product/substrate is improved and overall production is improved?
How would you report/identify the kinetic values for this enzyme? The true Km / Vmax would be at 50 C? How accurately should one describe "optimal" conditions before considering the Km / Vmax values for an enzyme? Would temp, pH and salt conc. be the main three conditions or are there others?

Respected colleague,
This question does not seek answers in the sense that both competence and loyalty are important.
For example: imagine you own a company and have two candidates for CEO. One is competent, but you know he / she is not loyal. You trust others, but you know that he / she is not competent.
If you had to decide between them, which one would you choose?
I am interested in reviewing research or hearing opinions based on the subject of adhering to the BACB Ethics Code when it comes to providing services solely within one's scope of competence while also acknowledging cultural responsibility. How can BCBAs provide ethical services to clients whose culture drastically differs from theirs? Is there ever a situation where a person's culture would present an issue outside of someone's scope of competence? If so, how would a BCBA reconcile these two issues?