Media Research - Science topic

We often warn the dependence of empirical research on humans for fear that it will cause future effects on him because when we deal with humans, we deal with a mass of feelings and feelings that may be affected to the point of changing their behavior and outlook on life, and this may threaten the nature of his life and social relations and it is difficult to remove these influences from him Contrary to applied research in pharmacology and drugs that can remove the effect by stopping the drug

📷

Please check the following article with the 4 philosophical foundations for social media:

"Theories of Social Media: Philosophical Foundations"

available at:

This is a novel job of farm broadcaster, especially in agriculture, it's simply a call of the day. We need to take technologies to farm to raise individual farm productivity for those countries whose economy is agriculture driven and so dependent upon vagaries of monsoon

I cover this topic briefly in courses where discussion of the history of the film business occurs - or when talking about sound design. Check out these references:

Clague, M. (2004). Playing in'Toon: Walt Disney's" Fantasia"(1940) and the Imagineering of Classical Music. American Music, 22(1), 91-109.

Cook, N. (2000). Analysing musical multimedia. p. 251-268. UK: Oxford University Press.

Culhane, J. (1983). Walt Disney's Fantasia. Harry N. Abrams, Inc..

Marks, M. M. (1997). Music and the silent film: Contexts and case studies, 1895-1924. Oxford University Press, USA.

Donnelly, K. (2001). Film music: critical approaches. Edinburgh University Press; Continuum.

Giroux, H. A. (1994). Animating youth: The Disneyfication of children's culture. SOCIALIST REVIEW-SAN FRANCISCO-, 24, 23-23.

Hi,

Maybe this paper could help:

integrating Theoretical Traditions in Media Effects: Using Third-Person Effects to Link Agenda-Setting and Cultivation

By: Jeffres, Leo W.; Neuendorf, Kimberly; Bracken, Cheryl Campanella; et al.

MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY Volume: 11 Issue: 4 Pages: 470-491  2008

Have you tried reading Marshall McLuhan's Laws of Media? I think the standard 4 quadrant of McLuhan's perspectives could be used to derive your typology of media effects.

Dear Ingy,

if you are sure that the wire inside the electrode is indeed silver, and you are filling the electrode with reasonably pure KCl solution, then you need to answer the question: what is that black deposit on the wire?

Please check the color of all possible silver salts / oxides, then ask yourself: how is this possible that I am making this salt/oxide on my reference electrode wire? Possibly the connections to your potentiostat are mixed up. Maybe the potentiostat itself is broken.

If this black color appears immediately when you fill your RE with KCl solution - this is either not silver, or not KCl (or both).

In any case, it is a good idea to check if there is any significant current flowing through your RE (this should never be the case), and at which potential your RE is with respect to your CE. A multimeter connected between the RE and CE will tell. If this voltage is very high (over one volt) - your potentiostat is not working properly, or there is a problem with your CE. Also check the voltage between WE and CE - if this one is very high, the capillary at the bottom of your RE may be blocked. Placing it in a beaker with hot ultrapure DI water usually unblocks it.

Always rinse your RE after use with pure water, then store in a beaker with aqueous KCl solution of the same molarity as you use inside the RE.

I was assuming that you would have counts of how often each source mentioned various things about terrorism, and that these would serve as the DVs. Can you share some examples of what your DVs are and how they are measured?

Dear Nazia,

Shanma is correct but I think may be of some use in helping you make your question clearer. 

1) What is hate speech? What you may think is I or others may not. Just as what I may feel is hate speech you and others may not.  Please define so reader can know what it is you are looking for.

2) Limit your question! What media source? It will be impossible to monitor every television channel, radio station, news papers,magazines, ect.  You may want to focus in on one but more than that you would need a team.

3) Methodology approach. In your study it may just be watching, listening, or reading and counting the number of times statements met your defined requirements for statement to be considered hate speech. Or listening to prime time shows and comparing them to one another. Many such methodologies are a valid approach to your question.

4) Have a statistical method or approach can be done much the same as #3. 

I hope this helps and I look forward to your reply,

Douglas

In my resent research in the area of metacognition (published in an Ebook called Adjunct Life by me, Maryann DiEdwardo, I talk about how students need to think about thinking. If you search databases in area of research on metacognition, there is evidence of lack of ability to think in areas of Africa due to cultural issues. These are only a part of strife and results of other issues that we all face such as neurological damage to children who are exposed to violence. 

The classic way to demonstrate the quality of the coding process is through inter-rater reliability. But that is mostly about showing that your procedures can be used "objectively" by different coders. As the name implies, this addresses reliability rather than validity.

Beyond that, you'll need to clarify what kind of validity your are seeking. Within survey research, validity usually refers to the measurement process: did the respondent understand the question in the same way that you meant it? If not, you have an invalid answer. This is also known as construct validity.

Alternatively, in experimental research, the typical issue is whether you have made an appropriate interpretation of the results. In particular, are there competing alternatives that could explain your results just as well? This is also known as internal validity.

It depends what you want to do. I think using form of discourse analysis - if you focus on particularly important or influential interactions is useful. You might have a look at something like if you don't know them already

Ekström, M., & Patrona, M. (Eds.). (2011). Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural perspectives on political interviewing, journalism and accountability (Vol. 42). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Hutchby, I. (2006). Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting Maidenhead: Open University Press.

O'Rourke, B. K., & Hogan, J. (2013). Reflections in the eyes of a dying tiger: Looking back on Ireland’s 1987 economic crisis In A. De Rycker & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives. (Vol. 52, pp. 215-238). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Sampling units will vary depending on how the researcher makes meaning; they could be words, sentences, or paragraphs. In the mission statements project, the sampling unit was the mission statement.

Context units neither need be independent or separately describable. They may overlap and contain many recording units. Context units do, however, set physical limits on what kind of data you are trying to record. In the mission statements project, the context units are sentences. This was an arbitrary decision, and the context unit could just as easily have been paragraphs or entire statements of purpose.

Recording units, by contrast, are rarely defined in terms of physical boundaries. In the mission statements project, the recording unit was the idea(s) regarding the purpose of school found in the mission statements (e.g., develop responsible citizens or promote student self-worth). Thus a sentence that reads "The mission of Jason Lee school is to enhance students' social skills, develop responsible citizens, and foster emotional growth" could be coded in three separate recording units, with each idea belonging to only one category (Krippendorff, 1980).