Legal Cases - Science topic

I read somewhere that Ulema in British India agreed to Shafei provision of Khula which was not granted under Hanafi Law because Muslim women had started converting to Christianity to seek divorce. Does anyone know any source providing more information and evidence on this?

In practice, Social Work acts from different professional perspectives. For example, the legal case perspective must be methodically related to other case perspectives such as anamnesis and diagnosis within the framework of casework, ideally in a concrete way and with appropriate methodological awareness. It would be conceivable, for example, to subject the results of an introductory anamnesis and diagnosis to subsequent legal monitoring.

Are there scientific concepts or legal requirements for this methodological challenge in your country? Or do you tend to leave the meaningful linking of different case perspectives to the professional actors? What seems to make sense to you?

Most of the current laws within this sphere were designed before the rapid progress of digital agriculture and therefore they can be interpreted differently. Most of the farmers using benefits of digital agriculture are concerned about data use (or theft) since they are no ICT experts and the data can be used for various reasons. Is it really a data theft then, since some of that data could (and should?) be used by the local (of national) agriculture authorities to monitor the agricultural process or production of the farmer (in case of governmental incentives)? For what else can it be used in that case? What if the software is freeware as a part of the agricultural incentives for farmers? To what level the farmer should be informed about it since there is no possibility to guarantee what will happen with that data in practice?

How do you see the advancement of the law in this field? How do you assess the current situation? Let me know what do you think.

I can't find many studies regarding gallbladder emptying times in dogs. In particular, I wonder if this observation has ever been used as a contribution in legal cases, for example to speculate on the time of the last meal. I am examining a dog killed by a gunshot wound: the stomach is full of food only partially digested, but the gallbladder is not empty (the bile duct was normally patent). Can I infer something about the time elapsed since eating its meal?

I have come across a number of PhD thesis and Research articles where 'the data has been obtained from analysis of Arbitration cases, law cases or some other reports. Often such data collection and analysis is combined with expert opinion as well.

Should this method of data collection and/or analysis be called Case Study Research or some other method like (Content Analysis, Document Analysis, etc.).

By Case study research I understand methodology proposed by Robert Yin (Case Study Methodology), Eisenhardt, and few others.

Please suggest references for your comments. Thanks.

National Laws are particular to each country and it is often a reflection of country economic and political status. Laws generally are evolving based on Legal Cases. The Legal Case will often introduce new Legislation(s) that may translate in new Law(s).

I was wondering if anyone had any expertise on the fourth amendment pertaining to electronic surveillance.

Would prospective warrantless StingRay searches that track a criminal to their own private residence be constitutional. Under the public movement doctrine, public roads are arguably covered, however if we follow Karo, it states that once the tracking invades the residence of an individual it violates the fourth amendment.

Thank you,

Dr. Sartre 

In February 2014, the Belgian parliament voted to extend the euthanasia law to include children under the age of 18. Do children have capacity for agency? Are they able to make decisions concerning their health? Are children mature enough to make such grave decisions? Is there a difference between adult euthanasia and child euthanasia? 

Im trying to develop a tool-kit for the courts for adjudicating climate change justice.

A pregnant lady with poly trauma due to assault admitted in hospital and she complaint to pain in abdomen as she was hit in her abdomen, during her course of treatment she aborted.

Dear all,

On 30 September 2010 the Ukrainian Constitutional Court ruled upon the unconstitutionality of the Constitutional amendments made by Yushchenko. Whereas there are several comments available in Ukrainian (which I understand), I do not find any discussions upon the topic in any other language (as they might reflect a different point of view), apart from the statement of the Venice Commission (http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2010/CDL-AD%282010%29044-e.pdf).

I searched Google Scholar and all I find are translated newspaper articles (i.e. the ones by ME Sharpe).

As I am updating an article from 2009, such articles would be very helpful!

Thank you in advance!

I am writing an article about the comparison of the regulations of the french référé procedure (in english: summary interlocutory proceedings) and the Hungarian small claims proceedings. The only thing that I can not find is in which cases the french people like to turn to the president of the court to initiate a référé proceding. In Hungary these procedings are initiated in the case of a claim under 1 milion HUF (approximately: 4761$ or 3000 euros). Is there a limit in the french system like in the Hungarian?

The realization of the budgets to be viabilize torts vary by event type harmful as the active subject that provokes so. A manager of a company that civil liability should take? A commercial company may sue for damages caused by mismanagement of the agency?

Whatever the origin and history of this protection, it is surely obsolete with modern technology, especially with recording or videoing of police interrogations and the ubiquity of mobile phones. Someone on the radio this morning said that nowadays suspects have seen so many TV cop shows that they just turn their backs on the police and refuse to answer any questions. This obviously greatly benefits wrongdoers and frustrates the police, but does it even protect the innocent? Even if it does, is this not out of all proportion to the mischief it causes?