Law and Courts - Science topic

In AI pandemic applications, the online automatic AI recording apparatus for official councils such as court trials, business conferences and commercial meetings will become imperative because it could let the opinion identification and consensus of participants be synchronically available to implicitly diminish social costs such as follow-up dispu...

Following Indonesian criminal law, courts may not find defendants or offenders guilty for various grounds known as illegal abolition reasons. There are two justifications and grounds for forgiveness for abolishing crimes under the Indonesian Criminal Code. The justification for abolishing this punishment is solely applicable to human legal subjects...

This chapter addresses the issue of Trade Secret Protection within the East African Region. It focuses its perspective, more so, on Uganda, with a few common law court precedents, bearing in mind that Uganda is the only country within the East African region that has specific legislation on the protection of Trade Secrets. The chapter thus gives a...

This research aims to provide a prescription regarding criminal objections regarding possession of narcotics. This research is normative research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials are laws, court decisions, and other official legal publications. The results of this research answer that legal advisors need efforts to bui...

The main goal of this research is to test the association between trust in institutions—e.g., police, law courts, property rights, government regulations, and public and private organizations—and entrepreneurial internationalization. The longitudinal analysis uses data obtained from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), the Heritage Foundation...

This paper outlines three broad models that have informed the relationship between the law and children’s involvement in decision making—the property/instrumentalist approach, the welfare approach, and a rights-based approach. It identifies and critiques contemporary legal practices that regulate children’s decision making against the standards req...

1. Introduction.-2. Problems of defining and understanding of property rights.-2.1. Definition of property rights under civil laws and codes.-2.2. Understanding and methods of protection of property.-3. Protection of property rights in Kosovo.-3.1. Actio rei vindication.-3.2. Actio publiciana (the lawsuit from the alleged property right).-3.3. Acti...

The government plays a role in protecting all forms of children's rights and providing education about the dangers of sexual exploitation on social media. This study uses the normative legal writing method which refers to the principles, norms, rules of law, court decisions, agreements and doctrines of the technique of collecting legal materials by...

This special issue brings together scholars from multiple disciplines and with varied research and geographic expertise to study the historical role played by the law in governing the political, social, and cultural life of twentieth-century South Asia. These articles have not emerged in a vacuum, but rather build on an exciting turn in South Asian...

Violence may happen anywhere. One of the ways to know and oversee the violence in some places is by installing Closed-circuit Television (CCTV). The recorded video captured by CCTV can be used as proof in a law court. Violence video classification is also one of the topics being discussed in deep learning. The latest violence video dataset is RWF-2...

For a long time the settlement was considered a “separate” institute of contract law in Croatian and comparative legal theory. Some authors considered it as a special contract (agree- ment), while others considered it just a change in the content of the existing contract. In addition, the institute of settlement was viewed as a strictly separate in...

In recent decades, jurisdictionally separate common law commercial courts have emerged alongside existing civil law judicial systems, particularly in the Middle East. Although these unique common law judicial outposts are creating complex jurisdictional dynamics with their local civil law counterparts, their existence is also inspiring innovative s...

Gabbeh carpets; The Persian (Iranian) word Gabbeh means something raw or natural, uncut or “rough”. Gabbeh is the world’s best known coarse Iranian weaving. Carpets and rugs woven in the mountains and plains of central south Zagros have been woven for the Gabbeh tribe for centuries. Another feature of Gabbeh carpets is the coarse carpets woven with...

We ought to rethink how we understand the conflict of laws in Australia with respect to forum statutes. This is an important issue: the proper treatment of ambiguous statutes is the focus of many, if not the vast majority of cases, including cross-border cases. Statutory interpretation is the primary means by which Australian courts must resolve cr...

The introduction to the ‘Condition Critical’ symposium explains the background to the series on the climatic and pandemic crises at the beginning of the 2020s. What is the role of the law in times of crisis? How does this force for continuity, predictability and order react to the discontinuity characteristic of disasters? The suspension of the law...

The study on the role of the arbitrator in finding out the truth aims to highlight the specific elements of the arbitration procedure, considering that it must be carried out with the application and observance of the principles of the civil process dictated by the Code of Civil Procedure for all judicial procedures. The principle of finding the tr...

To be sure, the more productive field of the international research on Protestantism is related to the subject of social history. In the case of the Calvin studies, for instance, readers will see, much has been written about the operation of the Genevan civil-church administration, consistorial discipline, sexual sins, and family-marital life. Thei...

Bullying is an event that is so worrying because it occurs in educational institutions such as Islamic boarding schools. The background to the occurrence of bullying is due to the different characters of the students, their age or level of education, and the culture of their family origin. With these various differences in the background, life in I...

This article addresses the issue of the representation of the German language status in legislative texts of the Federal Republic of Germany in the absence of the category «state language». The research methodology is based on the E. S. Kubryakova's understanding of the nominative aspect of the speech activity, who distinguishes two ways of designa...

This article explores how colonial law in India interacted with the construction of caste rank (varna) between 1860 and 1930. It specifically tracks contestations over Kayasthas' legal varna rank in northern and eastern India through various inheritance disputes, threading them together to shed light on how courts sought to anchor their interpretat...

After centuries of informal methods of dispute resolution in Nigeria, the judiciary as the third arm of government became the formal institution for settling disputes with the advent of the colonial masters. This led to high public expectation that the courts would always dispense justice with utmost effectiveness and swiftness; the court is thus s...

Recent studies of ancient documents illuminate how writing transformed governance, law, and culture in the two earliest regions where writing emerged: Mesopotamia and China. By 3000 BCE the profession of scribes had emerged in Sumeria, with scribes soon becoming central in finances, accounting, government, administration, law, courts, astronomy, ag...

Substantial research has demonstrated that the police are critical agents in dealing with the problem of DV and reducing its overall prevalence. The passage of the DV laws in Ghana and Nigeria made the police the primary agency to respond to DV: however, there is limited research on how police handle domestic violence in the two countries. This stu...

The position of individual creditors over the collateral in syndicated loan is represented by security agent as the recipient of collateral and the holder of material collateral. It is the legal consequence of agency relation as regulated in Syndicated Loan Facility Agreement. Therefore, the security agent in this syndicated loan, for the sake of l...

The judiciary is the executor of judicial power in charge of administering the judiciary in order to enforce law and justice based on Pancasila, with other tasks assigned to it based on the applicable law. In the framework of the rule of law, the existence of a state administrative court is essentially a logical consequence of the principle of gove...

Precedent is the cornerstone of the Common law system. Even in jurisdictions that follow Civil law, precedents constrain decisions when case law is sufficiently uniform. A systematic disregard of precedents makes judgments less coherent and the law less just. Nevertheless, relying on precedents can also make courts more efficient, whereas recent ad...

Electroencephalogram-based evidence was accepted in a UK law court for the first time in 1939. This paper gives an account of that case, not previously clinically reported, and the individuals involved. Why it was not published in the literature at the time is explored and parallels with more recent technologies are highlighted.

Çalışmada 1930’lar ve 1940’larda yazılan Cemal Refik’in Mahkeme Röportajları ve Sait Faik Abasıyanık’ın Mahkeme Kapısı isimli çalışmalarında yer alan mahkeme röportajları incelenmiştir. Temel amaç, iki yazarın röportajlarının özelliklerini belirlemek ve karşılaştırmasını yaparak aralarındaki benzerlik ve farklılıkları ortaya çıkarmaktır. Temel tez,...

Topic modeling is widely used in various domains for extracting latent topics underlying large corpora, including judicial texts. In the latter, topics tend to be made by and for domain experts, but remain unintelligible for laymen. In the framework of housing law court decisions in French which mixes abstract legal terminology with real-life situa...

Punishment is the bulwark that steers the effectiveness of the criminal law. The kind of punishment inflicted for a committed crime determines the level of crime control and compliance with the law. This work therefore attempts to scrupulously assess how the Ghanaian courts have developed and applied the basic principles of criminal punishment incl...

Issues on choice of law are sometimes very complex, and the resulting outcome may be determinative of most litigations. This is especially true where the litigation concerns cross-border transactions involving states with diverse laws and di erent legal traditions. Thus, it is important for parties to be able to accurately predict the applicable la...

The 1963 Republican Constitution of Nigeria was adjudged by scholars as the only post-independence constitution that put Nigeria on the threshold of a true federation. However, it is often argued in scholarship that military incursion into politics between 1966 and 1999 at various intervals torpedoed Nigeria's democratic journey towards federalism....

Food waste is an inefficiency problem that needs to be reduced significantly to achieve a sustainable food system. Best practices and knowledge are available on how to reduce waste but large volumes of food are still wasted every year, so policies that support or enforce broader implementation of best practices are needed. One policy that could be...

In this article four photographs of mixed law courts (landraad) in nineteenth-century colonial Indonesia are approached as a window to study the materiality and meaning of cloth in courtrooms. The photos grant access to a careful colonial curation as well as complex Javanese hierarchies that were translated onto and through cloth, and its colors an...

This study discusses the Criminalization of Homosexual acts. This research uses normative legal research. It is legal research that places law as a building system' of norma. The system' of Norm build include principals, norms, rules of law, court decision, agreements, doctrins (teachings). The author finda the conclution on this study that the leg...

Much is being written about feminist lawyering in the West, but what is the purpose of feminist lawyering in the patriarchal context in third-world nations? While reflecting on case laws and activism in India, this essay argues that feminist lawyering in a profoundly hierarchical society is a much broader concept than that of traditional lawyering...

Brief comparison of civil law and common law courts towards religion and religious organizations in sex abuse litigation.

There is an unacknowledged disagreement on what kind of dialogue best supports democracy. Many view democracy as analogous to a law court and so view "democratic dialogue" as a contest between competing advocates who have acquired the kind of "steel trap" critical thinking skills that are ideal for winning in the external marketplace of ideas. Othe...

The distinction between rights and remedies is a traditional and undebatable premise. It supports the classic account of civil law and common law as an inference from the role played by law in protecting rights and providing remedies. While civil law systems protect individual rights to the extent they are previously laid down by the legislature, c...

Background: Forensic taphonomy is the use of decomposition timeline estimation to unravel mystery behind time of death confirmation in homicide cases involving the law court. The Guinea forest-savannah vegetation is one of the vegetations in Nigeria characterized by short trees, grassland, very hot temperatures almost round the year, speedy wind, e...

This study analysed the dialectics of alleged murder and media trial of Chidinma Ojukwu on social media. The objectives of the study were to examine the Youtube and Facebook comments tied to Chidinma Ojukwu"s alleged murder case; ascertain the frames of Youtube and Facebook comments on Chidinma Ojukwu"s alleged murder case; and examine if the Youtu...

Violence may happen anywhere. One of the ways to know and oversee the violence in some places is by installing Closed-circuit Television (CCTV). The recorded video captured by CCTV can be used as proof in a law court. Violence video classification is also one of the topics being discussed in deep learning. The latest violence video dataset is RWF-2...

Violence may happen anywhere. One of the ways to know and oversee the violence in some places is by installing Closed-circuit Television (CCTV). The recorded video captured by CCTV can be used as proof in a law court. Violence video classification is also one of the topics being discussed in deep learning. The latest violence video dataset is RWF-2...

Digital Forensics investigation is the science and legal process of investigating computer/cybercrimes and digital media or objects to gather evidence. This new and fast evolving field encompasses computer forensics, network forensics, mobile forensics, cloud computing forensics, and IoT forensics; and for this reason have digital evidence distribu...

The study analyses the Hungarian and Austrian adoption laws that inspired lawmakers of the Czechoslovak Act No. 56 of 1928 Coll. As the Hungarian and Austrian laws, the Czechoslovak Act of 1928 on Adoption recognised adoption as a contract to ensure an heir. It advocated compliance with the principle adoptio naturam imitatur. Therefore, it helped t...

The relationship between criminal law and morality is multi-layered and complex. This relationship is marked by the relationship between criminal and moral wrong, which this paper deals with. Its goal is to perceive and analyze the similarities and differences between a crime and a moral offense. This could contribute to answering the question of w...

The statute of limitations in terms of criminal liability constitutes a subject of intense debate as a result of the Romanian Constitutional Court issuing Decision no. 358/2022. This judgement cannot be disassociated from a previous ruling of the same body, namely Decision no. 297/2018. The present article sets out to analyse the leading theoretica...

This article examines the ways in which Finnish courts co-construct families and the legality of immigration in their decisions over the facilitation of ‘illegal immigration’. Building on scholarship that stresses the central role of migrant social networks and family ties in cross-border mobility, it challenges the placing of transnational organis...

I write to speak of silencing and the suffering of survivors of domestic abuse in the family courts of England and Wales and the struggle to find a voice to articulate the hardship faced in this lockdown through court. It has taken the whole period of lockdown to find the words, the courage to keep writing, even as tears stream down my face, even a...

Background: Decomposition timeline is the interval from death to complete decay of a carcass. Accuracy in the estimation of this interval helps to confirm the testimony of an alibi or suspect in homicide investigations especially at the law courts. Objectives: This study investigated the early and late visible post-mortem changes of porcine analog...

We examined participants' attachment styles based on criminal attitudes. ◆ Attitudes toward the court predicted three types of attachment, including dependent, anxious, and close attachment. ◆ Identification with criminal others predicted dependent and anxious styles of attachment. ◆ Tolerance for law violations predicted anxious style of attachmen...

Communal and ethnic conflicts have been endemic in Tiv-land and these have underdeveloped the area. In order to check the menace of the crises, the paper attempted to unravel the causes and effects of the phenomena and also proffer solutions to their causes so that the Tiv nation can grow and develop. Information for the study was got through prima...

This study aims to analyze the apparatus of customary justice and the code of ethics in dispute resolution and how the dispute resolution model is used in the Gampong customary court. For some cases, a husband and a wife who are divorced in customary court are officially divorced according to customary law, but they do not have formal legality so o...

Edward Coke’s Prohibitions del Roy (1608) at first sight seems a typically English discourse: a common law judge arguing for the independence of the common law courts from his king and from the conciliar courts and civil law jurists. A closer look from a European position reveals another picture, however. Compared with discussions by his (near) con...

The protracted chieftaincy conflict in Dagbon in the Northern Region of Ghana was recently resolved through an interplay of formal and informal resolution mechanisms, where the latter dominated the peace-making process with home-grown peace mechanisms. In the past, the state through formal liberal peace mechanisms like the law courts, committees an...

Forensic accounting is a new trend that goes beyond normal audit approaches and procedures for fraud identification. The practice applies reliable principles and methods to obtain sufficient facts or data that provide basis for prosecution in the law court. Forensic accountants characteristically need adequate know-how and skills for investigation...

This article examines the relationship between oral traditions of cursing and the oldest Greek curse tablets from Selinous and Himera in western Sicily. As much early Greek writing is thought to record or reflect the spoken word, it is perhaps unexpected that these early Sicilian texts carry few signs of orality or speech. There are no verbs of spe...

The case law of the CJEU and the ECtHR enhances the recognition of a status acquired abroad. The German legislative and judicative have consequently reacted, especially in the field of international name law. While the case law of the CJEU has fundamentally changed private international law approaches, the case law of the ECtHR so far has only been...

This article refines a common narrative about eighteenth-century commercial law and its relationship to economic development. It looks at a specific doctrinal strand of English common law–promissory notes–and argues that their recognition by statute without regard to common law’s requirements led to a serious destabilization and a crisis for the le...

How do courts root themselves in traditional tort principles and policies and also develop tort common law in ways that befit contemporary values? This essay argues that judges should weave classic tort aims of harm prevention and redress with contemporary norms of equality of persons, to provide a fuller accounting to people foreseeably risked and...

This study employed empirical, case, and comparative analysis methods to examine how Hong Kong’s courts have judicially interpreted the concept of human dignity. It aimed to understand the concept of human dignity in Hong Kong law and its role in judicial adjudication and to explore the contributions that Hong Kong’s courts have made to interpretin...

The literature study of this article aims to analyze the challenges that must be considered by financial regulators, especially for Islamic financial institutions (Islamic banking). Literature study through content analysis by discussing the book Intermediate Islamic Finance by Nabil Maghrebi, Abbas Mirakhor, and Zamir Iqbal Wiley publisher in 2016...

Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) has a long history and has stagnated since the Middle Ages, whose impact is still being felt today. Various innovations have been braved enough to violate the boundaries of doctrine between schools of thought in Islamic judicial decisions in its development. It is this issue that Noel J. Coulson describes in Conflict an...

Purpose This research aims to examine and compare differences in waṣiyyah wājibah (obligatory bequest) (WW) practices in Malaysia and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach This is an exploratory qualitative research, employing a thematic analysis approach. Six Muslim Wills (State) Enactments [Enakmen Wasiat Orang Islam (Negeri)] in Malaysia, Isla...

This study analyzed readers’ comments on select social media sites on Chidinma Ojukwu’s alleged murder case. Examine the sensitivity of Youtube and Facebook users on Chidinma Ojukwu’s alleged murder case; examine the direction of Youtube and Facebook readers’ comments on Chidinma Ojukwu’s alleged murder case; and examine the impacts of Youtube and...

Appointed in 1959 adviser to the Ministry of Justice, of which he was in reality the main architect for fifteen years, Guillaume Gillet (1912-1987) was called on to tackle two of the most important programmes mandated by the “garde des Sceaux” (French equivalent of “Lord Chancellor” or “Attorney General”) Michel Debré: the construction of new priso...

This open access book analyses the practice of banishment and what it can tell us about the values of late medieval society concerning morally acceptable behaviour. It focuses on the Dutch town of Kampen and considers the exclusion of offenders through banishment and the redemption of individuals after their exile. Banishment was a common punishmen...

The most obvious difference between civil law and the common law system is that the civil law system is a codified system, followed by legislation covering this area, while common law is based mainly on case law. The basic principle that applies is that earlier court decisions, usually of higher courts, made in a similar case, should be followed in...

Much is being written about feminist lawyering in the West, but what is the purpose of feminist lawyering in the patriarchal context in third-world nations? While reflecting on case laws and activism in India, this essay argues that feminist lawyering in a profoundly hierarchical society is a much broader concept than that of traditional lawyering...

This study demonstrates that self-interpretation does indeed occur in Kenyan courtroom proceedings, a situation that necessitates the use of a language other than the regular and official languages of Kenyan courts. Such language use rendered mostly in terms of self-interpretation has far-reaching ramifications on the content, facts, style, and mea...

Ethnic groups exist almost everywhere. Generally, each group is related to uniformly, although it may comprise several subgroups. An example is Israel’s Palestinian-Israeli population, which consists of three ethnic–religious subgroups: Muslims, Christians and Druze. They coexist in nearly all domains of life, but maintain separate schools and fami...

Court of Cassation, Joint Sessions, no. 16601/2017 has opened the doors to the recognition of punitive damages, thus sparking a debate about the role of punishment in private law. The idea lying at the heart of the judgment is that it is possible to adopt a model in which the task of repressing or deterring socially harmful conduct is no longer per...

This article aims at promoting a new approach regarding criminal law and crimes that include a provision that relates to pregnancy. We thus try to set a starting point for future debates on the manners in which European countries criminalise offences related to pregnancies. We lay an emphasis on how the criminal legislation might have a considerabl...

This thesis investigates Finnish criminal trials that involve people from cultural minorities through the use of ethnographic methods. The study examines how those involved in criminal trials actively mobilise the notion of culture, on one hand, yet reproduce an image of law and its subjects as acultural and without context, on the other. Through a...

The very foundation of any democratic society entirely rest on the ability of the law courts to administer true justice and restore peace. The continuous maintenance of the dignity of the law courts and public confidence in their ability to perform these twofold vital duties makes the progress of every nation sustainable. And it is the exercise of...

It has long been noticed that there is no predetermined meaning of legal terms. Rather, meaning depends on the context and the interpreter (Engberg in Brook J Int Law 29:1135, 2003. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol29/iss3/6). While this assertion holds true for both unilingual and multilingual legal environments, the Court of Justice of...

Following the assassination of Henri IV in 1610, the political turbulence of Louis XIII's early reign led to renewed efforts to police the book trade. Yet this period also witnessed a golden age of so-called 'libertine' literature, including a plethora of sexually explicit and irreverent poetry as well as works of free-thinking that cast doubt on t...

Common law courts have struggled to offer a consistent basis for sentencing in cases concerning civil disobedience. This case note examines the recent Court of Appeal decision Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd v Persons Unknown, concerning individuals convicted of contempt for defying injunction orders to refrain from continuing their direct‐action protests at...

The Paper reports on the challenges on the exposition of Traffic signs and symbols to Lagos State roads users. The result has proven that there is low exposition of traffic signs and symbols to road users most especially the Drivers in Lagos State, Nigeria. The overall average percentage of road users who correctly interprets the regulatory signs w...

In this study, survival analysis was used to determine the mean time to justice delivery in the District, Circuit and High courts in Tamale Metropolis of the Northern Region of Ghana. Three main models, namely; Kaplan-Meier estimator, Cox regression, and gamma distribution were utilized in the analysis to explore all useful information that can hel...

Background. In the era of global transformation, affecting the sphere of state building, the importance of complex, federal systems is increasing. To describe them, it is advisable to use unified approaches in the form of models, an important component of which is such a structural unit as the constitutional federal process. The purpose of the arti...

This paper reviews the urgent need for all the key Iganga district stakeholders to unite against the escalation of the current dangerous community mental health problems in the eastern region of Uganda. The main objectives of the paper are to ascertain the main causes, sources, and users of the psychoactive drugs by different members of the local c...

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2 nd October 1869 at Porbandar in Gujarat. His parents were Karamchand Gandhi and Putilibai. Gandhi founded the Natal Indian Congress into a homogenous political force and also evolved the nonviolent Satyagraha which later became a potent method in fighting for Indian Independence. Gandhi asked the people to w...

This study firstly analyses the general approaches of EU and US laws to the right to be forgotten. Then, basing on the right to be forgotten, a variety of dimensions from comparative law, court practice, doctrinal views and different legal sub-branches are considered from the aspect of Turkish law. Although there is no specific provision on the rig...

Peer2Peer communication can take place in the traditional way via e-mail, forums or social media. One also finds dedicated apps for communication or organized in groups, such as WhatsApp, Telegram or Discord, the latter being particularly popular with digital gamers. Online games are another medium which can foster communication between people over...

In June 2021, an Employment Tribunal accepted the claim from the complainant that the UK regulator, the General Medical Council may have discriminated against a doctor based on his race, ethnicity or religion in their processes and outcomes. [1] This is perhaps the first time that such a claim of discrimination based on race, ethnicity or religion...

Courts play a significant role in the human life. What is the history of the court? What are the characteristics of early development of the United States court system? What are the milestone cases of the supreme court history? What is the history of the courts in England and Wales? What are the types of the courts? What is the role of the courts?...

The study deals with the person and the activity of György Igyártó, whose carrier had a major influence on the judicial system of Cluj in the late 16th century. The analysis points out some interesting features concerning the possibilities, challenges and difficulties of an early modern procurator’s life. First in the service of the citizens, then...

It seems paradoxical that facts, data and science are still considered controversial despite the harrowing death of a multitude of people from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an unparalleled health care crisis of our lifetime. In addition, while scientists are desperately attempting to produce a vaccine for COVID-19, a large segment of the pop...

Addressing climate change globally requires significant transformations of production and consumption systems. The language around climate action has shifted tangibly over the last five years to reflect this. Indeed, thousands of local governments, national governments, universities and scientists have declared a climate emergency. Some commentator...

The author in this paper, focuses on the legal situation in which one party (real debtor) encumber his real estate to secure monetary debt of second party (personal debtor), (srb. hipoteka za tuđi dug). In practice, this legal effect is most often achieved through the security purpose agreement or declaration of will with an enforcement clause obli...

Олійник О.М. Розвиток трудових відносин і законодавства про працю в Україні (1917-1929 рр.). – Рукопис. Дисертація на здобуття наукового ступеня кандидата юридичних наук за спеціальністю 12.00.01 – теорія та історія держави і права, історія політичних та правових вчень. – Національний університет внутрішніх справ. – Харків, 2003. У роботі досліджен...

"The proliferation of hadiths spawned a parallel body of law, believed to be “equal” to the law based on revelation. The prophet tried to prevent the proliferation of traditions. But people proceeded to record and disseminate them regardless. The result was a parallel system of law. This requires attention. The elevation of hadiths to revelation su...

Introduction INTRODUCTION-OBJECTIVES. Similar to philosophy (regina-scientiarum) is psychiatry fundamental-discipline for all-medical&social sciences. Immanuel KANT: Primus inter pares of ARISTOTELES&PLATON considered over 200years ago physiological and pragmatic anthropology-[1]. Social physiology is given-[3-4]. Consideration of social-psychopath...

In March 2020, the family law courts, like other Australian courts, moved to hearing proceedings ‘remotely’, by phone, audio-visual link or software platform. This article examines the particular circumstances of family law cases that likely impact on whether it is appropriate for remote procedures to be used. Giving context to these themes, the ar...

Background: Although social media was designed with the aim of bringing good, it has however taken negative trajectory in societies of the world which has resulted in unpleasant outcomes such as conflicts, lack of Ubuntu, family disintegration and even death of some people. All sectors of the society that include media, government departments, the...

Background Very few studies have investigated the effect of the process of litigation on the mental health of litigants. In Ghana, not much is known about the stress that litigants encounter and how they cope during the process of litigation. Methods This study used a mixed-method sequential explanatory design to explore the stressors people litig...

Introduction: Maternal mental health problems and substance misuse are key risk factors for child neglect or abuse and court-mandated placement into care. Linkage between mental health records and family court data could raise awareness about parent mental health needs and inform approaches to address them. Objectives: To evaluate data linkage b...

It has come to notice how the prosecutors abandon their statutory duty which is to see that just verdict is reached at the end of the trial process and not to strive for conviction at all cost, however they abuse their power and subject the accused to rigorous, chaotic, demoralizing and inexplicable situation in law court. The duty of a prosecution...