Science topic
Latin America - Science topic
The geographic area of Latin America in general and when the specific country or countries are not indicated. It usually includes Central America, South America, Mexico, and the islands of the Caribbean.
Questions related to Latin America
Using present-absent effective targeted chaos and independent rule of law theory where the true majority view(T) competes with the true minority view(M) for access to power, the structure of two forms of liberal democracies and permanent authoritarianism can be stated as follows,
where
E = effective targeted chaos present,
e = effective targeted chaos is absent,
I = Fully independent rule of law system is present,
i = fully captured independent legal system = Fully non-independent legal system
Normal liberal democracy = NLD = (T.M)(eI)
Extreme liberal democracy = ELD = (T.M)(EI)
Permanent authoritarianism = PA = (T.M)(Ei)
So the question: Can you see how the structure of the death of liberal democracies can be stated in terms of effective targeted chaos and fully captured independent legal systems?
What do you think?
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2016. Perfect Green Markets vrs Dwarf Green Markets: Did We Start Trying to Solve the Environmental Crisis in 2012 With the Wrong Green Foot? If Yes, How Can This Situation Be Corrected? In: International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research (IJAEMR), Vol.1, Issue 6, Pp 389-406, August, India.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2016. Beyond Green Market Thinking: What would be the Structure of the Perfect Sustainability Market?, In: International Journal of Science Social Studies Humanities and Management (IJSSSHM), Vol. 2, No. 5, May, Ed. Dr. Maya Pant, India.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2016. Understanding the Death and Paradigm Shift of Adam Smith’s model: Was Going Green the Only Option? If not, Is This Option the Most Sustainable One?, Weber Economics & Finance (ISSN:2449-1662 ), Vol. 2 (3) 2016, Article ID wef_169, 540-546.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2015. Did Adam Smith Miss the Chance to State the Goal and Structure of Sustainability Markets in His Time? If Yes, Which Could Be Some of the Possible Reasons Behind That?, Boletin CEBEM-REDESMA, Año 8, No. 11, November 30, 2015, La Paz, Bolivia.
Muñoz, Lucio, 1999. Understanding Sustainability Versus Sustained Development by Means of a WIN Development Model, In: Sustainability Review, Warren Flint/PhD(ed), Issue 1, September, USA.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2015. Towards True Sustainability Step By Step Is Fine While There Is Time: Pointing Out The Unifying Nature Of True Sustainability With The Help Of The True Sustainability Wheel, Weber Economics & Finance (ISSN:2449-1662), Vol. 1 (3) 2015, Article ID wef_150, 321-329.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2013. Utilitarianism, Raw Liberalism, Moral Liberalism, and True Sustainability: Basic Paradigm Foundations, Changing Assumptions, and the Evolution of Development Paradigms, In: The Mother Pelican Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, January, Ed. Luis Gutierrez, PhD, USA.
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2012. Complex and Man-Made Markets: Are We Currently Approaching Sustainability in a Backward and More Chaotic Way in Terms of Economic Thinking?, In: The Mother Pelican Journal, Vol. 8, No. 8, August, Ed. Luis Gutierrez, PhD, USA.
Have you read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2011. From Dying to Eternal Economies: When Should the Paradigm Shift from the Non-Renewable Resource Based to the Renewable Resource Based Economy Take Place?, En: Desastres Naturales, REDESMA, Vol.5(2), October, La Paz, Bolivia.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2012. From Traditional Sweatshops to Green Sweatshops: Is this a More Socially Friendly Strategy? In: The Mother Pelican Journal, Vol. 8, No. 6, June, Ed. Luis Gutierrez, PhD, USA.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2011. The Present versus the Future in development thinking: Towards Agricultural Sustainability, Journal of Sustainability, Issue 3, Number 3(Winter), Rio Rancho, New Mexico USA.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2010. Where Should Donors Place Their Monetary and Trade Incentives to Encourage Developing Countries to Implement Balanced Pro-Rich/Pro-Poor Development Programs?, Journal of Sustainability, Issue 3, Number 2(Fall), Rio Rancho, New Mexico USA.
You read current ACADEMIC PAPERS on sustainability written like if the concept never existed before despite being available with just a simple RESEARCHGATE SEARCH OR ACADEMIA SEARCH OR GOOGLE SEARCH since before and after WCED 1987 called for moving away from business as usual. Ignoring the past to advance concepts as new is not consistent with Thomas Kuhn's paradigm evolution loop. And this raises the question, Is the current sustainability research agenda in support of business as usual based on academic tunneling?
I think Yes, what do you think?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2003. Building the Basic Foundations of Global Sustainability, Sustainability Outlook, Warren Flint(PhD)(Ed), Issue 29/July, Washington DC, USA
Are you familiar with the lessons learnt from the coming and going of BREXIT/Brexism and USEXIT/Trumpism in 2016-2024?
Here is a simple academic way of looking at the NEW LIBERAL DEMOCRACY LANDSCAPE where you have normal democratic outcomes competing for power against extreme democratic outcomes….
Muñoz, 2024. Rethinking democracy 102: What are the 3 fundamental lessons learned from facing exism movements and dictatorship threats 2016-2024?. In: CEBEM-REDESMA Boletin, Año 18, Nº 11, La Paz, Bolivia.
Here some good food for thoughts!
Muñoz, Lucio, 2010. What If Markets Have Always Been Distorted? Would It Then Be a Good Fix to Add Fair Trade Margins to Correct Distorted Agricultural Market Prices?, Journal of Sustainability, Issue 2, Number 4(Spring), Rio Rancho, New Mexico USA.
These days, when talking about the circular economy, they use talking points without even mentioning the pollution production problem associated with the working of the traditional market or with economic activity which it is also present in the working of circular markets or circular economic activity...See how the UN CLIMATE CHANGE PROMISE talks about a circular economy with no link to its pollution production problem nature and with no mention of the need to move one day to pollution-less economies....
" What is circular economy and why does it matter?
And this raises the question: Imagine you are the environment, can a circular pollution production solution/circularity fix the linear pollution production problem/linearity you face?
What do you think? If you think Yes, please indicate why. If you think No, please indicate why no.
Note;
This is an academic question, not a political one.
Article in English and in Spanish
Muñoz, Lucio, 2009, How Do Agricultural Development Benefits Actually Spread: Is it the Trickle-Down Effect or the Embudo Effect? In: Environment and Society, Special Edition, No. 372, January 8, ECOPORTAL, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2009, ¿Cómo son los Beneficios del Desarrollo Agrícola Actualmente Distribuidos: Es el Efecto Goteo o el Efecto Embudo?, En: Ambiente y Sociedad, Edicion Especial, No. 372, Enero 8, ECOPORTAL, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Look at today 2024 and compare it to the ideas shared here and you may see what it should have been from 2008 towards RIO + 20 UNCSD 2012 and after if we were REALLY INTERESTED in slowly transitioning POLLUTION PRODUCTION ECONOMIES to the fully renewable energy-based economy.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2008. Renewable Energy Vrs Social Needs: What Do Environmentalists Must Do to Induce the Development of a Sustainable Market fueled only by Renewable Energy?, In: Agrocombustibles, REDESMA, Vol 2(1), Section VII, March, La Paz, Bolivia.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2003. Eco-Economic Development Under Social Constraints: How to Redirect it Towards Sustainability?, In: THEOMAI, Issue # 8, October, Argentina
Muñoz, Lucio, 2003. “Stakeholders, Attitudes, and Sustainability: The Need for Attitude Convergence”, Sustainability Outlook, Warren Flint (PhD)(Ed), Issue No. 22, February, Washington DC, USA
Muñoz, Lucio, 2000. Unprotected Areas, Protected Areas, and Sustainability Under Green Development Policies: Which are the Expected Impacts?, In: THEOMAI, No. 2, Argentina
The current trend appearing to have come from nowhere in 2024 promoting economic circularity to solve a sustainability problem embedded in it is mind boggling, which leads to the question: If a linearly polluting society is not sustainable, how can a circularity polluting society be sustainable?
Perhaps someone promoting economic circularity can explain
Note:
This question is academic, not political.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2002. Non-Traditional Research Methods and Regional Planning Needs in Developing Countries: Is There An Ideal Methodology?, In: THEOMAI, Issue 6, Second Semester, Argentina
Muñoz, Lucio, 2002. "The Meso-American Biological Corridor and Regional Sustainability: An Overview of Potential Problems and Their Policy Implications", Issue 32/August, DHIAL Journal, IIG/Spain
Muñoz, Lucio, 2002. “Are We Appropriately Assigning Causes to Global Warming?”, In: Sustainability Outlook, Issue 16, November 13, Warren Flint(PhD)(Ed), Washington, DC, USA.
Think about willful academic blindness(ACADEMIC TUNNELING) vrs willful democratic blindness(POLITICAL TUNNELING)....
The first type/academic tunneling seems now normal, taking place at universities, thinktanks, international organizations, governments....which will lead to the death of science in a way that THOMAS KUHN was not expecting, BUT IT IS NOT BEING SEEN AS A THREAT TO THE SURVIVAL OF SCIENCE as it seems we are now in a non-science based world as science or not, they still will push what they want to push.....
The second type/political tunneling is SEEN as an existential threat to liberal democracy as political tunneling does not work under democratic rules just see the political dynamics under political tunneling processes under exism movements like Trumpism....
Hence, willful political tunneling with the support of alternative facts is seen as a serious threat to democracy from within, but willful academic tunneling with the support of alternative academic facts is not seen apparently as a serious threat to science from within, which makes you wonder, why.
And this raises the question, Why willful blindness is taken as a serious threat to the survival of democracy, but not the survival of science?
What do you think?
Note:
This is an academic question, not a political one.
The Traditional Market and the Sustainability Market: Is the Perfect Market Sustainable?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2000. " An Overview of Some of the Policy Implications of the Eco-Economic Development Market", In: Environmental Management and Health, Prof. Walter Leal Filho/PhD(ed), Vol. 11, No. 2, Pp. 157-174, MCB University Press.
You have seen the comings and goings now of Trumpism, Brazilianism, and Brexism, 2016 to 2024 and the common theme is why they failed to persist in power ONCE THEY CAME TO POWER. You have seen the direction that exism movements take towards permanent authoritarianism. And you may be familiar with the environment in countries with permanent authoritarianism.
If you look at the evolution of democracy theory since 2016 paradigm shift from normal to extreme liberal democracies in some countries you and you adjusted your previous democratic thinking as now EFFECTIVE TARGETED CHAOS and THE NATURE OF THE COURT SYSTEM IN A CONJUNCTURAL CAUSALITY MODE play a key role. And you compare this environment to the one found in countries UNDER permanent authoritarianism you may see some similarities in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions for them to keep power for ever between the structure of permanent authoritarianism from within and well as from outside.
If you take into account this, then you may be able to see that the necessary and sufficient conditions for permanent authoritarianism to stay in power for ever using this new thinking has technically not changed, it is the same before 2016 and it is now in 2024..
And this raises the question: What is the necessary and sufficient condition for permanent dictatorships to remain in power regardless of opposing democratic movements?
What do you think the necessary and sufficient condition is?
Note: The answer is short.
If you understand what is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements like Brexism, Trumpism, Brazilianism.... to persist at all cost in power once they have power are within a liberal democracy under independent rule of law system you should not be surprised by ideas like USA Project 25 to come up as once exism players realized why they can never be in power for ever inside the democracy they are born into they will try to, if possible, proactively, create the conditions for staying in permanently in power once back in. And this raises the question: Should ideas like USA PROJECT 25 be expected to come up in places where exism movements came and went like in the UK or Brazil in the future?
I think Yes, what do you think?
You are families with coming and going of exism movements like Brexism 2016-2024, Trumpism 2016-2020, Brazilianism 2019-2023, and other exism movements still active out there, and this raises the question, Can exism movements gain power and/or remain in power without the existence of effective targeted chaos?
I think No. What do you think?
Since 2016 Brexit, the world needed to change the thinking behind traditional democracy as the democratic landscape changed, yet traditional democratic thinkers and actors have been acting as if the competition for power is STILL BETWEEN NORMAL DEMOCRATIC OUTCOMES that are happy to live within an independent rule of law system, when it is no longer the case as now a new variable came into play, legal targeted chaos, that when effective it is a game changer as it leads to extreme democratic outcomes that should be expected to be unhappy living under an independent rule of law system. To be able to answer general questions as the one here, we need to rethink democracy thinking.
And this raises the question: In terms of chaos, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for authoritarianism, permanent or temporary, to come to exist and persist?
What do you think is the answer to this question is from the point of view of just CHAOS?
Exism movements after gaining power within liberal democracies under majority rule and independent rule of law system become permanent dictatorship threats, but why this is the case is not clear yet apparently neither to politician's pro and contrary to exism movements, and this raises the question: Why do exism movements once in power become permanent dictatorship threats within liberal democracy thinking under majority rule and independent rule of law system?
What do you think is the reason why?
Note;
This is an academic question, not a political one.
You see internal and external dynamics in majority rule-based countries with actual extreme democratic outcomes at play and in countries with want to be extreme democratic outcome around, all majority ruled based countries, but even though this has been going on since just before 2016 BREXIT and 2016 USEXIT and continues today with the coming of an extreme democratic outcome in Argentina...
Yet politicians in normal democratic outcome run countries have not yet CLEARLY figured out that the idea that DEMOCRACY is a mess within democratic competitors like NORMAL DEMOCRATIC OUTCOME AGAINS NORMAL DEMOCRATIC OUTCOME, where both are normal democratic outcomes with the best interest of the majority at hand but different approach has CHANGED as when competition is between A NORMAL DEMOCRATIC OUTCOME VERSUS AN EXTREME DEMOCRATIC OUTCOME the nature of the MESS changes as the extreme democratic outcome is not restricted or bound or it does not believe in the democratic values and rules under which it is born; and hence, cometition has a different structure. Hence, the way democratic outcomes compete with extreme democratic outcome needed to change since 2016, but it has not changed yet.
It seems normal democratic outcome run countries appear to be still following normal democratic theory when competing with EXTREME DEMOCRATIC THEORY/ exism theory, which indicates why they have been more often than expected been taken victim of the Murphy’s law under efficient targeted chaos.
Hence, everything changes when we shift from normal democratic outcome to extreme democratic outcome in majority ruled based countries, both internally (extreme democratic outcome vrs normal democratic outcome) and externally (extreme democratic outcome-based country versus normal democratic outcome-based country, and there is a reason to rethink to keep democratic norms where the best interest of the majority, not the minority, rules under majority rule democratic based systems.
And this raises the question: Does paradigm exism theory explain why normal democratic outcome-based countries should not be expected to get along with extreme democratic outcome-based countries?
What do you think? What is your view on the answer to this question.
It seems to be back to square one with Brexism, Brazilianism, and Trumpism....They came and they fell in ways away from how traditional democracy theory and thinking works....I wrote since 2016 how extreme democratic outcomes can come out, how they will behave once in power and how they could persist or fall, how important effective targeted chaos is and how important the independent law system and morality is together with predictions/expectations given whether or no targeted chaos is effective or not within an independent rule of law system and majority rule.... If what happened to Brexit July 2024 is consistent with what happens in the USA in November 2024, then the outside the box theory may have several validating points. And this raises the question: Does the fall of BREXISM, Brazilianism and Trumpism mean we know when they come and when they fall in theory and in practice?
What do you think?
You have seen the comings and goings now of Trumpism, Brazilianism, and Brexism, and the common theme is why they failed to persist in power ONCE THEY CAME TO POWER. If you look at the evolution of democracy theory since 2016 paradigm shift from normal to extreme liberal democracies in some countries you and you adjusted your previous democratic thinking as now EFFECTIVE TARGETED CHAOS and THE NATURE OF THE COURT SYSTEM IN A CONJUNCTURAL CAUSALITY MODE play a key role you may be able to see that the necessary and sufficient conditions for extreme democratic outcome to come to exist as temporary authoritarianism is different than the necessary and sufficient condition binding to persists under reelections at all costs and become permanent authoritarianism.
And this raises the question: What is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to become permanent authoritarianism from within liberal democracies?
What do you think the necessary and sufficient condition is?
Note: The answer is short.
The USA is a very powerful country with strong paradigms and curriculum structures that links US university research and professional profiles to the needs of US private corporations and the US government. It seems that Mexico is at risk of adopting US paradigms and priorities of US universities when Mexican universities have great need to research about key Mexican issues as massive poverty, indigenous populations, regional inequalities, food production, health policy, etc. Mexico should be very careful, avoiding a critical adaptation of US science and technology paradigms that are far away from responding to social needs and ethical responsibility.
It seems that since 2012 Rio +20 Conference, the world has been moving away from science based perfect market thinking, a moved that apparently has been helped by the confusion created by the 2012 green market paradigm shift avoidance move or the green market shift avoidance period 2012-2024, and this raises the question, Is science based on a political definition science?
What do you think? Yes, why? No, why not?
Both Europeans and Yacuruna arrived in Peru via water, are comparatively hairier than indigenous Peruvians. Both Europeans and Yacuruna also have harmed the Incans.
Most in researchgate may be familiar with concepts like golden paradigms and flawed paradigm and paradigm evolution, but what about the idea that links them all, which may lead to or be behind distorted knowledge based policy action.
And this makes the following question interesting based on a new term: What is a golden trojan paradigm?
What do you think? Why?
We know that there are flawed paradigms and golden paradigms. A pollution production market is a flawed paradigm and a pollution-less market is a golden clean market paradigm.
And this raises the question: Is a circular non-renewable energy dominant based economy delinked from social friendliness a golden clean market paradigm?
What do you think? Why?
In my next papers I will focus on the fact that past development assumptions made affecting system stability have complicated policy correction and action in terms of system stability problems, like the assumption that market dynamics and population dynamics are independent factors affecting system stability.
And this raises the question: If markets were optimal since 1776, then from where the over population problem came from?
What do you think?
Market approaches and population dynamics approaches to system stability issues like environmental problems assume market and population dynamics independency. In other words, they assume market impacts work under population dynamics neutrality: they do not have population dynamics impacts; and population dynamics impacts work under market dynamic neutrality: they do not affect markets,
And this raises the question: Does the market and population dynamics independency assumption used by development practitioners explains the origin of the over population problem?
I think No, what do you think? Why?
Dear Researchers,
I am seeking peers for do Educational Researches. Currently, I´m starting as Professor Research at Universidad Internacional Antonio de Valdivieso-Nicaragua (https://www.uniav.edu.ni/) in the deparment of Education. I working in a program of a Initial Training Teacher on level of pre-grade an grade.
Me encuentro realizando una investigación sobre La Historia del Comercio Internacional de Colombia, En el Primer capítulo me encuentro abordando los imperios Latinoamericanos precoloniales como el Azteca, Inca y Maya; busco información relacionada en temas Geopolíticos, Económicos y similares de Latinoamerica Precolonial.
these sites are running very efficiently and withdrawing money from young researchers. Please take some necessary actions against them if possible. Most of these sites are operating from Burlington, U.S.
1. AMA fake - domain address is - https://www.shin-norinco.com/
using journal name - AMA (Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, ISSN - 00845841)
The true site is- https://www.agriculturalmechanization.com/
2. fake site- https://www.thescientist.online/
3. fake site is-http://aatcc.peerjournals.net/
true site- https://www.aatcc.org/connect
Please Sir take some action against them.
with regards.
Dear collegues,
resending in case someone has missed it- I am now producing a book with Edward Elgar publishing specifically on teaching entrepreneurship in emerging markets (call attached)
It will be a guide for best practice from universities and training centres in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. I would like to share the call with you and was wondering if perhaps yourselves, any colleagues or PhD student who have taught entrepreneurship courses may be interested to kindly share their valuable experience in a short chapter or share to someone who might. Currently we have got local authors from Malaysia, Nigeria, Panama, Bahamas, Indonesia, and the UAE and look forward to more.
Apologies if it is not of interest and thank you for your time,
PM for any questions and thank you
Please no Spamming***
Working on a paper in which i analyze the language of pain in fiction from India and Dominican Republic.
What is the rationale behind using the term 'Latin American music' as a comprehensive category to comprehend and classify a wide range of musical styles in Latin America? To what extent does this categorization simplify the diversity and complexity of musical traditions in the region, and what challenges might it pose from an academic and cultural perspective?
This is a methodological discussion on Lithium, which I pose in form of three open questions:
1) Who to trust when it comes to lithium reserves? Usually It is assumed that there are still no International certification processes but rather evaluations by some National Geological Agencies. Considering that we could be talking about a real sensitive issue, is it possible to imagine other reliable sources?
2) How to determine, rigorously, the commercial value of lithium and its evolution over time? Some apps and/or specialized webs calculate the price of lithium carbonate, even in a clic, although it is difficult to determine where there is exactly negotiated. Are there reliable alternatives?
3) How to calculate, prospectively, the strategic value of lithium? I'm afraid that some forward-looking calculations are excessively linear. Considering the uncertain environment,, is itn't possible to think in a some kind of a correction factor?
I have some ideas but I would like to hear your qualified voices
Thank you very much
Hello!
We know that Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease present in tropical areas of Africa, Asia, Latin America and some parts of Europe.
In the pharmacological treatment of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis, what are the most adverse effects that occur during treatment?
I would be very grateful if you would help me to obtain information about this.
Best regards
Source of image: Jaquet Droz automata.
I also want to take this opportunity to promote the journal that I edit. The upcoming issue's central theme will be "Anarchy and Anarchism," and the call for submissions is open until May 31, 2023. You can find more information about the call at the following link:
Additionally, the (Des)troços journal accepts ongoing submissions of works related to radical thinking and the publication's editorial line. If you have any questions about (Des)troços, please let me know. I think this is an excellent opportunity for you to promote your work in Latin America and create space for discussion. Please let me know if you have any questions.
//
Je souhaite également profiter de cette occasion pour promouvoir la revue que j'édite. Le thème central du prochain numéro sera "Anarchie et anarchisme", et l'appel à contributions est ouvert jusqu'au 31 mai 2023. Vous pouvez trouver plus d'informations sur l'appel à l'adresse suivante :
De plus, la revue (Des)troços accepte des contributions en cours sur des travaux liés à la pensée radicale et à la ligne éditoriale de la publication. Si vous avez des questions sur (Des)troços, n'hésitez pas à me le faire savoir.
Je pense que c'est une excellente occasion pour vous de promouvoir votre travail en Amérique latine et de créer un espace de discussion.
N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez des questions.
Hi all,
I am working on a book proposal about Cinderella in Latin America. I am looking for collaborators. If you have any interest in this topic, or have written on any related themes, please read the draft proposal attached and let me know. Please send me an abstract, even if your country of research on Cinderella is not listed.
Thank you!
Maia
Any colleague interested in researching new paternities in law in Latin America. I am interested in collaborative work among colleagues from several countries.
Please write to me via Researchgate Messenger.
1.AMA-AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION IN ASIA AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA
ISSN / eISSN 0084-5841
Publisher FARM MACHINERY INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH CORP, 2nd Floor, Dai-ichi Amai Bldg. 1-12-3 Kanda Nishiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, TOKYO, Japan,
Same ISSN / eISSN 0084-5841
Two journals available
The phrase 'mulata toribia' refers specifically to Encarnación Ezcurra de Rosas, the wife of the notorious dictator, Juan Manuel de Rosas. It was used as an insult by her enemies, the Unitarians. 'Mulata' refers to her dark hair and skin but 'toribia' is not as easy to define. I have looked at some explanations suggesting that it means 'controlling', 'domineering', 'spiritually aware', 'intelligent' and 'determined', but I am unsure as to whether any of these translations are accurate. Any further advice on this matter would be much appreciated. Thank you.
The IPBES assessment "Options for delivering sustainable approaches to health” is looking for examples where programs and policies have included indigenous and local knowledge. If you know some examples even are not fully documented your contribution will be appreciated.
(Add your answers in english, spanish, or french).
Thanks
Hello everyone,
I am looking for links of Mexican datasets that can be used in classification tasks in machine learning. Preferably the datasets have been exposed in scientific journals.
Thank you for your attention and valuable support.
Regards,
Cecilia-Irene Loeza-Mejía
In the current energy context, which would be the best energy alternatives for Latin America and the Caribbean in the future? I very much appreciate your participation in this discussion.
Hello everyone,
I am looking for links of audio datasets of indigenous Mexican languages that can be used in classification tasks in machine learning.
Thank you for your attention and valuable support.
Regards,
Cecilia-Irene Loeza-Mejía
Hi,
I would like to know different papers of this topic because I'm researching around it by my thesis.
If the papers analyze cases in Latin America, it would be better.
Thank you
In the current world energy scenario, the shortage of energy carriers and the low energy efficiency of industrial processes in Latin America have sharpened productive competitiveness in this region. In this context, do you consider that Small Modular Reactors (SMR) can be an energy alternative for Latin American nations? Please argue your answer. I really appreciate your collaboration.
I'd like to submit a research proposal on the potential of human migration as a vehicle of pathogen movements from South to North America. Basically I need a collaborator with experience working with migrants in the region. Thanks !!!
Numerous countries in the global south, particularly in Africa, Latin America, and south Asia, have struggled to grasp the technology transfer process. In these countries, technology conceptions, incubation, and entrepreneurship, as well as startup drafts left on desks prior to initial trial and implementation— Why? Probably. Keeping in your mind the political ecosystem and economic instability are two issues that these countries frequently confront, while other world leading nations' occasionally face, too. What, in your thinking, are the causes behind this failure? And how do they uproot the root causes--either in collaboration or independently?
1.Why?
2. Why?
3. Why?
What lesson left over from Asian tigers catch up development to the rest of the world--herein?
Hi, I would like to focus my dissertation on the phenomenon of the public voting 'NO' to the Colombian peace treaties of 2016.
I have done some brainstorming:
Causes:
- Opposition campaign lead by popular ex-president Alvaro Uribe
- Cultural differences
- Historical background (suffering)
- People not interested in politics
- Media, propaganda coverage, fake news
- Difficulty in reading the peace accords
- The church involvement against the government
- Electoral victory of Alvaro Uribe
I was wondering if you had some theoretical knowledge I can link my research to? I would really appreciate some help narrowing down to have a more focused direction, thank you.