Knowledge Sharing - Science topic

Dear Laiba Saif

Sorry, I only have papers about education, improving the quality of learning and about education

thanks and best regards

Sutarman

Dear Sreenath Sukumaran

Use the help center via the following link

best wishes

To

All ResearchGate Members who are interacting on this Question:

#🌎🌎🌍🌍🌏🌏#

We had never before the following:

*Highly informed global society due to information technology,

*Importance to knowledge sharing, *Interdependency requirement of all,

*Importance to cooperation at all levels.

Please remember “Mother Earth” has given enough to satisfy everyone's need, but not everyone's greed.

Let us believe, we have one life hence contribute towards humanity and develop a new concept “One Earth and One Family”.

Wish you all a happy and prosperous New Year.

🙏🙏

Reducing carbon emissions in sustainable tourism requires a multifaceted approach. First, promoting eco-friendly transportation options like electric buses or encouraging tourists to carpool can significantly cut emissions. Additionally, adopting renewable energy sources for accommodations and emphasizing energy conservation can reduce a destination's carbon footprint. Implementing waste reduction and recycling programs in tourist areas further supports sustainability.

Furthermore, educating both tourists and local communities about responsible environmental practices is crucial. Encouraging low-impact activities, like hiking and wildlife observation, rather than high-emission alternatives, helps protect fragile ecosystems. Finally, governments and industry stakeholders must collaborate to establish and enforce carbon reduction targets and eco-certifications, encouraging responsible tourism practices while fostering environmental stewardship. These strategies collectively contribute to a greener and more sustainable tourism industry.

How did you measure trust? Our experience is that top management rarely has anything to do with knowledge sharing -- even if they say "it's part of our culture". It's the Emergent Network ... which is built on experience and trust. Maybe look at how people are connected to measure "trust". Trust is NOT an individual property, it is a joint/community property.

Look at attached article ...

"Trust and understanding must be built between sender and receiver – this is similar to apprentice- ship. Explicit knowledge travels over computer networks, but tacit and complex knowledge needs to be shared and learned via human networks."

"A professional network/commu- nity, once established, is hard to break up – even with much manipulation of the formal organization. Thick ties of trust survive both the intended and unintended pushes and pulls of organizational change."

You need to look at Social Network Analysis to measure trust in an organization!

Dear doctor

Go To

Bridging the Business Data Divide: Insights into Primary and Secondary Data Use by Business Researchers

by Linda D. Lowry (2015)

"Abstract

Academic librarians and data specialists use a variety of approaches to gain insight into how researcher data needs and practices vary by discipline, including surveys, focus groups, and interviews. Some published studies included small numbers of business school faculty and graduate students in their samples, but provided little, if any, insight into variations within the business discipline. Business researchers employ a variety of research designs and data collection methods and engage in quantitative and qualitative data analysis. The purpose of this paper is to provide deeper insight into primary and secondary data use by business graduate students at one Canadian university based on a content analysis of a corpus of 32 Master of Science in Management theses. This paper explores variations in research designs and data collection methods between and within business subfields (e.g., accounting, finance, operations and information systems, marketing, or organization studies) in order to better understand the extent to which these researchers collect and analyze primary data or secondary data sources, including commercial or open data sources. The results of this analysis will inform the work of data specialists and liaison librarians who provide research data management services for business school researchers."

Dear Mohammad Shah Khairi

Yes, of course, there is a relationship between organizational communication and knowledge sharing. You cannot effectively share knowledge without good communication, and there is often no good communication where knowledge is poor.

I hope this helps.

Identifying, creating, storing, sharing, and using knowledge are core activities that should be aligned or integrated into an organization's business processes and balanced according to its specificities. A knowledge management solution should not focus only on one or two activities in isolation.

Some RG projects were archived and can be found at e.g. this link:

It appears that many people have indeed archived their RG projects, and many archived RG projects can in particular be found at this link:

Dear Singh Sir,

Thank you for the prompt reply and references. Surely, I shall look for the mentioned papers.

Regards,

Koyel Mallick

Dear Adham Osama Ahmed This depends very much on the publisher. If you mean your paper published by the publisher ASME you can find the details here: https://www.asme.org/wwwasmeorg/media/resourcefiles/shop/journals/get_your_work_noticed_flyer.pdf It states and I quote: “Submit the pre-publication version to your institutional repository or a subject-specific repository (with ASME permission)”

So, the final version cannot be uploaded, and I estimate that ‘officially’ you are not allowed to upload a pre-publication here on RG either (it is not a “subject-specific repository”). If your university has their own repository, you can upload the accepted manuscript version there.

Best regards.

PS. You can scroll through the list here https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Journal-of-Solar-Energy-Engineering-0199-6231 and see that indeed the majority (but not all) papers are only here on RG as link and the full-text is not uploaded.

Thanks for sharing Felix. I will go through it.

Adaptation is a natural dimension of research. Definitely you can explore the usability of an already existing method with different condition and observe what can emerge. But you can not report this paper as a methodology contribution, rather you can claim you contribution as survey saying that you have surveyed an existing method with different context. The method is not the scientific condition you are making, rather you can claim the context or empirical testbed you are offering is your contribution.

In my experience Mentors almost always take on the stance of knowing everything from their experience and giving advice to the mentee in that direction. In my view all mentors should be trained in coaching techniques (but few are) so they can help the mentee find their own solutions and only impart guidance (preferably ideas for consideration) when the mentee is stuck. If the mentor is not in a mindset where they want to learn too (including from the mentee) and forego their ego, outcomes will be less than the best it could have been.

Research Gate is a great platform of knowledge sharing for researchers, its like social media for researchers, in order to take it to the next level some suggestions can be implemented;

a) If Research Gate can have a Content modeator, it would be easy to filter out spam, fake accounts, and other non-serious individuals.

b) If Research Gate can embed research tools like plagiarism checkers, spell checkers, auto language editors, translators etc, it will have a wider reach towards its target audience.

c) Can Research Gate Publish its own Research Journal so that researchers can have a cheaper and a quality alternative to paid Journals.

d) Research Gate can have a separate e-learning section where short-term -courses on various research software, academic writing, plagiarism, academic misconduct, and academic integrity can be taught so that many new researchers can be benefited from experienced researchers.

there are various methods to do this in AMOS or SPSS

check this link:

Also this video explains the concept very well which might be helpful for you:

test whether coefficient on your regression is significant. If it is, conclude that X and error term are indeed correlated; there is endogeneity.

If I understand you, my friend Reuven Shapira, when you state that the explanation is due to the impact, then the investigation is at the causal level, but the question is whether the investigator has raised the intervening variables? Precisely, through discussions the approaches on LMX are clarified, I would like the opinion of the researcher,...

Can anyone please share an employee productivity (perceived) scale that can be used? I am kinda having a hard time looking for a structured questionnaire for my study about POS and employee engagement and one factor for EE is the level of perceived productivity.

To interact with other researchers

To me the biggest concern or limitation of knowledge sharing via SM would be 'false/fake/untrue' knowledge. Hence knowledge would have to be validated before sharing or it could have chaotic consequences.

Check https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Cooney_entrepreneurship_skills_HGF.pdf

Hi Ju,

I hope you are doing well! I am wondering if you are not using the correct code to specify a regression vs adding an observed variable as an indicator. These two codes are not the same thing. For example, in R's Lavaan I would use F =~ I to specify an observed variable (I) as an indicator to a factor (F). However, if I wanted to regress the observed variable (I) onto the latent variable (F) I would use F~I. You should not need to do any extra complex calculations of the observed variable or the factor scores as you are suggesting. Correctly specifying a regression, versus an indicator, should easily allow you to use a latent variable as a predictor for an observed variable.

Hope this helps!

Best,

Bryant

Dear,Nida ji

Knowledge management and entrepreneurship

David B. Audretsch, Maksim Belitski, […]Erik E. Lehmann

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal volume 16, pages373–385(2020)Cite this article

Congratulations on the idea, Professor! For more than twenty years I have been studying and exploring the field of leadership and organizational culture and their various aspects, and I would love to share my observations and experiences. I would be honored to be part of an international team with such a research focus.

Best Regards!

Valentin

Let point to the other face of the problem: Why do the poor remain poor?

Cory Cobb , Thank you so much for your cordial answer!

Respected Sir,

My suggestion is now days MEMS+Biomedical is one of the booming area in the field of research work.Apart from this weather monitoring,MEMS+IOT,MEMS in the field of antennas are also interested areas using RF Technology.

Thanking You.

In organizations, knowledge can move rapidly or slowly, usefully or unproductively. Those who place faith in internal knowledge markets and online platforms to promote knowledge stocks and flows should understand how extrinsic incentives can crowd out intrinsic motivation.

Aouf Al-Tabbakh

Researchers with the same specialty make the research more mature.

Hi Mohammad,

The main factor in the knowledge sharing among staff in an organization is the "Organizational Culture". As the culture in the organization becomes formal the knowledge sharing among the staffs tends to decrease and an informal culture in an organization makes the knowledge sharing easier among the staffs. But one thing should not be forgotten, Organizational Culture can act as barrier and enabler and its very difficult to manage and control it.

over 90% of the knowledge sharing in the organizations that ends to innovation happens in an informal way.

You may look into "Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)"

Regards,

Arif

Every one has his own way to help , for example , the teacher in school helps by his teaching his students well , and the doctor helps by the good care for his patients , ... and so on ...

As we are researchers , so our help will be through our researches .

and if there is a benifit from this , it will be for all , and no problem at all to get this benifits .... like the doctor , he cures the patients and also he takes money ,... it is okay and no problem at all.

Yannick - I think your aim shouldn't be to modify an existing theory to fit into your research. For your PhD research you need a theoretical framework relevant to your area of study and its applicability to your area of research. Theories are helpful to explain, predict, and understand phenomena and, in many cases, to challenge and extend existing knowledge within the limits of critical bounding assumptions. A theoretical framework is important because it will allow you to conceptualize the study in a broader context (i.e., the field of knowledge) and connects the researcher to existing knowledge. Guided by a relevant theory, you are given a basis for your hypotheses and choice of research methods. It will also address questions of why and how. A theoretical framework specifies which key variables influence a phenomenon of interest and highlights the need to examine how those key variables might differ and under what circumstances.

Hai Hussain,

Its very evident that research became part of our teaching profession. Ranking and Accreditation process are the buzz words that add flavor to this long running process.

Coming to the knowledge sharing perspective among researchers, due to exponential growth of technology the level of interaction as grown enormously across the globe. Need for collaboration in funded projects, consultancy projects and journal papers puts together passionate and like minded researchers together. Enhancing the count of contacts across the globe along with multidisciplinary research and same field research strengthens the network. Conference venue influences and promotes knowledge sharing among the researchers.

Need to go long way to ensure healthy research environment.

ادارة المعرفة لا يمكن قياساها بدون التطبق

حيث يتم قياسها باعتماد صيغ الاختبار من قبل اصحاب الخبرة لدارسة و تقييم المعرفة الظاهرية

و الاهم ان نظم ادارة المعرفة لقياسها بدقة يجب اعتماد المقارنة بين المنظمات و الدوائر المختلفة للوصول الى افضل النتائج

Thumb-up. It is long overdue.

At present, many academic and academic centers are developing computerized knowledge sharing projects by providing open access to digitized scientific materials, results of research carried out or various types of data collected for scientific purposes. The development of new online media has accelerated the process of knowledge sharing through the open access to digitized scientific materials, as part of the so-called re-sharing of scientific materials on the Internet.

The following paper can help you in getting an idea of evaluating KS system:

Al-Rasheed, Amal & Berri, Jawad (2017). Effective Reuse and Sharing of Best Teaching Practices. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 25. No.. 2, 2017

I guess this depends on the community. In business-related communities I do not see this as a major problem. There a quite a few dubious journal that publish every paper if the authors pay but the more respectable OA journals have processes in place that filter out really poor publications.

If you want your paper to be seen, read and cited, then it must be a quality paper published in a well known peer reviewed journal. You can also send a copy of your paper to the authors whom you have quoted or referred in your paper.

my latest paper on impact of OTT on telecom companies. Yes whatsapp impacted alot, i would say improved the knowledge sharing and effective communication.

DONE

BEST OF LUCK

Trust: has two items first from that person which has knowledge or information, we trust him/her because he/she has good background knowledge and experience, he/she help others or us several times and he is a major person on that field. Second from the organization and top manager which they want to share knowledge to develop company or ...

In telecommunication company, government and top managers want to start this program to force special staff to share their knowledge, but they insist to share and all program failed it happened just because "trust" they did not trust government and managers.

The motivation of stuff is a very deep and ambiguous matter of any organization, depending on your aim, production, knowledge, and psychology matter.

For that you must read human resource field books chapter motivation and ...

No problem. To which address can I send the scheme of the methodology. Is that what interests you?

Teaching students how to learn - It is based on the principle that learners must be taught how to search for and discover knowledge rather than a teacher spoonfeeding them with the knowledge. Thus, educators globally advocate the implementation of learner-centred approaches rather than teacher-centred approaches. It is as it were, arming the students with knowledge on how to fish rather than giving them fish.

I would look at the networks within and between the teams -- organizational network analyisis. Networks that include exchange of work items, ideas, knowledge/learning, support, advice/expertise, etc. You can then see how well people and groups are connected in the network of teams.

Attached is a network map of the distributed group and here is a link to a white paper on the analysis we performed --> http://orgnet.com/IBMCOPSNA.pdf

Tacit knowledge is hard to be transferred because of its difficulties in coding. However, in universities or in organizations in general, tacit knowledge can be transferred via online knowledge sharing platforms. Different organizations will use different types of online knowledge sharing platforms. The point is that when one person have any inquiry, they can post their question on the platforms and anyone who has experience/skills can share their knowledge.

Reputable journals generally do *not* collect money to publish a research paper. However, reputable journals do have a rigorous peer review process.

The most reputable journals (with high impact factors) for studies of knowledge management include Information Systems Journal, Information & Management, Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Management Information Systems, and MIS Quarterly. None of these charge a publication fee.

Your welcome. Good Luck

Open access has pros and cons. For sure, making articles (and other knowledge products) free for all does increase readership, which may be particularly important in low-income countries where researchers recurrently explain that lack of access to subscription-based journals is a problem. That said, someone must still cover the cost of publication: where funds are scarce, this may discourage authors from going open access. Other disadvantages may include lack of quality control and sustainability: on the one hand, open access models may incentivize journals to publish more articles; on the other, they may not adequately support the research publication infrastructure in the long term.

Worldwide, the resources allocated to the organization, conduct, and attendance of conferences (and related purposeful gatherings of people)—of which the opportunity cost incurred from taking part is no loose change—must surely be astronomical. Presumably, charging for attendance helps to recover a portion of expenses (when the purpose of the conference is not simply to make money). Even so, we seldom assess the relative value of conferences to participants (or even event planners). The true value of a conference lies in its effects on participants. Conferences are to generate and share knowledge that impacts behavior and links to results: this will not happen if the state-of-the-art of conference evaluation remains immature and event planners do not shine a light on the conditions for learning outcomes.

Dear Mr. Kingsley Ajekwene,

no, the EMI SE effect of a bulk material is only a effect of the electromagnetic

intrinsic values.

Onyl one product have a mechanical problem with the mechanical strength.

This is a gascet.

In the dependence of the mechanical pressure we have a change of the shielding effect.

Sincerely Yours

F. Gräbner

In hospitals the nature of work is completely different with other industries as it deals with human's health; and applying all knowledge management areas is crucial indeed.

Regarding just managerial fields, information flow and knowledge sharing is less sensitive than medical and health industries.



I'm not sure that I understood your question completely. But the answer would be yes. If you analyze the individual level variable then you will capture the effects from various levels of organization on the considered individual level variable.

Thank you Hasan Issa for your reply.

Hi Mouza

I did my research in knowledge sharing specifically among Higher education academics. The trend (and most probably future works) would be in term of social media, personalities (the big five model), perceived cost and social network. Of course there are plenty of other variables, it should be based on your research problems and objectives.

And of course, there has been studies that tested knowledge sharing as a mediator.

Don't try to construct questions 'in a vacuum'; so, much as suggested above, initially, just go into the field with a general enquiry derived from your first research question and encourage respondents to talk about knowledge and retention strategies in their industrial sector; data from these initial open interviews will certainly get you started in constructing a more incisive questionnaire, and may cover all of your research questions.

Remember of course, that in Grounded Theory, a question-set is always in development as more data comes in---theoretically, until data saturation.

Hi Sandeep,

Certainly, disseminating and sharing knowledge is a central concern of conferences. However, I've found them very beneficial for networking purposes ... I've met several co-authors through attending conferences.

Have a great day!

--Adrian

Luca Ardigò I give up also. Nothing new and quite annoying to see the pop up appearing very often. I just uninstalled.

No idea why clever company like Clarivate is sharing this not helpful tool. Mybe there is something that is not so clear up to now to me.

Dear Muhammad Shujahat, Tom Broekel and Jay Klagge,

Thank you for for your answers to my question. I formulate this question since there is a huge inertia in accepting new ideas in understanding the concepts of knowledge, knowledge dynamics, knowledge management and intellectual capital. For details, I attached two papers to explain some aspects of this new framework. Thanks again for your contribution!

Dear Khan,

In addition to recommendations above, some readings on "virtual teams" (not inter-organizational but intra-organizational) may be helpful.

Good luck in your studies!

Best regards,

Mehmet

Dear all

Thank you so much for your inputs

Thanks to Ette Etuk

Thanks toDebopam Ghosh

Thanks toSafa Aouinti

Have a wonderful day.

Best Regards

Nishad.

Following up on John's answers, you need to specify a little bit more what you mean by outsourcing.

Simply outsourcing manufacturing to an external supplier might indeed lead to a loss of knowledge and capability on the buyer side. That is why many companies--starting with Japanese automotive companies---increasingly use supplier engineers in their development projects. So what you see is that companies first outsource, and then develop a deliberate knowledge-sharing routine for integrating supplier knowledge and capabilities into their innovation efforts. This is called Supplier Involvement/Integration in NPD.

People also sometimes refer to 'design of buy design' as another level of decision making regarding outsourcing.

See

Iansiti & Clark https://academic.oup.com/icc/article-abstract/3/3/557/696611

Le Dain et al

I think dealing with Information Systems dimensions is more suitable. You can find answers in the book of Laudon & Laudon:

Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm

I think the social component is important in the relationship between employers and employees / when employees who have tacit knowledge, they get paid, compensation, health care and everything is available / employers will be able to transfer this implicit knowledge into explicit knowledge. can you read :

It is a great initiative！Using words, pictures and interactive videos is one of the efficient means of utilizing technology in the sharing of knowledge. Congratulations my brother. Many of us would mimic your footsteps.

My little caution is to verify facts you want to present in the videos as we do in research （Validity）and practice what you intend to post via knowledge sharing to rid it of all possible mistakes. All the best.

Motive for sharing knowledge should be to propagate it for human benefits and further exploration by others.

Motive behind not sharing is some thing that is secret should not be shared and some one not eligible for a particular knowledge should not be given a particular knowledge.

I use RG specifically because of the paywalls of ACS and their ilk. I suspect RG users won't give them any credence.

The following sources should also be helpful, particularly: Banking business model; Relationship lending/marketing in SME banking; SME lending/finance; Equipment lease; Risk management; Bankruptcy predicting elements/model; Bank competition analysis; Bank service-quality measurement, etc. 

The scale from Srivastava, Bartol, & Locke, 2006 was a combination/adaption of two scales 

Four items from Faraj & Sproull, 2000: 

1. People in our team share their special know ledge and expertise with one another

2. If someone in our team has some special knowledge about how to perform the team task, he or she is not likely to tell the other member about it (R)

3. There is virtually no exchange of information, knowledge, or sharing of skills among members (R)

4. More knowledgeable team members freely provide other members with hard-to-find knowledge or specialized skills

and three items from Durham, 1997:

5. My team members help one another in developing relevant strategies.

6. My team members share lots of information with one another. 

7. My team members offer lots of suggestions to each other.

Hi Paul

I think the following link to my project can help you.

Thank you so much Mr. Nizar ! I will investigate.

Regards