Science topics: Journal Articles
Science topic
Journal Articles - Science topic
Journal Articles are the predominant publication type for articles and other items indexed for NLM databases.
Questions related to Journal Articles
Dear All,
I have some studies that need to be written to journal article. the topic is about friendship and loneliness. Maybe if we can collaborate please chat in discussion reply and i will contact you to explain the full content of the research
Hearing soon.
Regards,
Devie
If you are active in international publications in the field of education, maybe you are what we are looking for.
Wall Street Journal article “Survival Strategies: After Cost Cutting, Companies Turn toward Price Increases” by Timothy Aeppel (September 18, 2002, p.A1)
I tried to share a journal article with those that requested it and couldn't because of this error. Please advise. The article was in the form of a PDF
Does a proceeding publication will count as a publication of article?
Hi All,
I’m often asked to suggest academic Design Journals, but find it hard to find a 'one-stop' list so researchers/ students can review and select. I’ve started a rough list in no particular order (link below). Any Design related journal suggestions would be welcome, from Innovation to engineering, education to ergonomics, UX to Design history, etc. Discipline-specific or Interdisciplinary.
Please offer some suggestions and Il add them to the list. Looking for quality, peer-reviewed offerings.
Thanks alot!
P.J.
I follow this guide to plot CUSUM after ARDL:
But i read some journal article that ECM model is to be plotted. Can i know is it different to plot ARDL model itself or the ECM version? Which should we plot?
I am curious concerning the various types of publications in academia (e.g. systematic reviews, journal articles, etc)
Is this good? A beginner's guide on how to write a journal article for publication in WOS

The following information concerns the preparation of your assignment for the Financial Econometrics module. The aim is to write an academic paper (informative and formal) by analysing the data provided using the statistics knowledge acquired so far in the module.
For this assignment/exam, your aim is to explore the following research question:
“What determines profitability of European banks?”
1) You are expected to write the research work on your own.
2) You have to use the data set for European banks (“eurozone.xls”) available on the school’s portal. The data relates to various characteristics of the individual banks.
3) You are free to use any of the variables provided as long as your analysis is meaningful and tackles the research question. Please note that you should use the statistics you believe more appropriate for best describing the data set.
4) Please do not include raw data at the end of the paper since this would only waste paper.
However, you should select data from the original data set to prepare your assignment.
Assignment Structure
There are different formats which could be used for this assignment but you may consider the following structure below for your work:
• Abstract
• Table of Contents
• Aims and Objectives
• Review of relevant literature and theory.
• Methodology and Data (including the definition of variables)
• Results and Discussion
• Conclusions and recommendations
• References
• Appendices (additional relevant material)
Further instructions
Your submission should include an appendix of the printouts of your Stata do-file (if applicable) and your Stata output. Your written report should contain all relevant estimation and hypothesis test results (as if you were writing for a journal article). Marks will be awarded for presentation, and you are encouraged to devise informative means for presenting the results, including tables where appropriate.
You may collaborate in working out how to run the estimations on Stata. However, you are required to write up your report independently, and I will require a separate and independent submission from each person.
Please come and ask if you are experiencing difficulties.
Dear community,
I spend the last days reading many questions and responses as well as several journal articles and research papers on the topic of time series analysis and the individual steps. Unfortunately, the more I read the more confused I became...now I hope that you can help me out.
I am writing my master thesis about FDI determinants in Ethiopia. I have selected FDI per GDP as dependent variable and several independent variables (exchange rate change, inflation rate, labor force participation rate, telephone subscriptions per 100 citizens, a governance index (ranking from 0 to 100), and exports + imports as ratio of GDP). I am also thinking about adding a dummy variable to reflect the effects of the Growth and Transformation Plan in 2010.
The next step is to analyse the data empirically in order to investigate the impact of the explanatory variables on the FDI inflow. Due to data availability I only cover a period of 20 years (1996-2016). I read several papers on this topic but somehow everyone performed/applied different steps/tests/models. Also the order of the test performed varies in the papers.
I am really confused by now with regards to the differences between OLS, ECM, ARDL, and VAR and what is the most appropriate method in my case.
In addition, authors performed (some didn't) different tests for unit root/stationary, for co-integration, for multicollinearity, for autocorrelation, for heteroskedasticity. Also in a different order.
Besides, I am confused about the lag selection process and the meaning/difference of AR(1) and I(1).
Moreover, many authors transformed the variables first with log. I cannot do that as I have to negative observations (inflation rate).
Earlier I also read something about trend and difference stationary and depending on this different unit root test.
Like I said, I am just so confused by now that I don't even know who and where to start.
I am working mainly with SPSS but will perform the unit root tests in Eviews as SPSS do not have this function.
I really hope that you can help me by providing a little guideline on what I need to do and in which order. Thank you so much!
What is the typical timeframe for a published journal article to be indexed in SCIE/Web of Science (WoS)?
Can I publish my design in my research article at the time of design patent submitted to IPR?
Two weeks before I submitted my design to IPR for patent purposes, I would like to upload the research article to the journal. In that journal, I used that particular design.
Is it okay to upload that article, or is there any other alternative way?
Is there anyone who can help me in finding the appropriate template for this Elsevier journal?
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism is a refereed academic journal published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra in Jakarta and in collaboration with the Association of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy (AAFI). The journal conscientiously aims to provide a scholarly platform for critical and informed articles, particularly in the field of Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. Such issues arise out of classical and contemporary discussions from varied traditions, either Eastern or Western, hoping to contribute to the resolution of various theoretical, methodological, and practical issues in the aforementioned fields. It covers the following scopes and issues: Philosophy of Philosophy (Epistemology and Ontology); Philosophy of Humans; Philosophy of Language; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Morals; Philosophy of History; Philosophy of Culture; Philosophy of Art; Philosophy of Politics; Philosophy of Sociology; Philosophy of Education; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Psychology; Theoretical and Practical Sufism.
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism has been accredited SINTA 3 on December 7th, 2022, by the General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia (SK Dirjen No. 225/E/KPT/2022) and effective until 2025. Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism is published twice a year in June and December.
We invite fellow researchers, academics, lecturers, and students to send their research and research papers to us to be published in our journal, and at the same time, we invite you to become editors and reviewers of our journal.
Qualification for Editor or Reviewer:
- Last education minimum Master Degre.
- Graduates or experts in Philosophy, Islamic Philosophy, and Sufism.
- Have Google Scholar accounts (Especially if you have a Scopus ID).
- Ready to work voluntarily without getting rewarded.
- Registration form via http://bit.ly/3IWdRnT
For manuscript submission, you can go directly through our website https://journal.sadra.ac.id/ojs/index.php/kanz
Egi Sukma Baihaki, M.Hum.
Editor in Chief of Kanz Philosophia
How is this possible on ResearchGate?????
Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran is a refereed academic journal published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra in Jakarta. The journal conscientiously aims to provide a scholarly platform for critical and informed articles, particularly in Quranic studies. The journal contents discuss various matters related to the Qur’anic Studies, the Exegesis Studies, the Methodology of Qur’an and Tafsir studies, the interpretation of the archipelago (Tafsir Nusantara), the Living Qur’an, The Qur'anic Hermeneutic, the Qur’an and Social Culture, The Qur'an and Science, thoughts of figures about the Qur'anic Studies, and the thematic Qur'an. Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran published two times a year in April and October.
We invite fellow researchers, academics, lecturers, and students to send their research and research papers to us to be published in our journal, and at the same time, we invite you to become editors and reviewers of our journal.
Qualification for Editor or Reviewer:
- Last education minimum Master's Degree.
- Graduates or experts in Qur'anic Studies and Tafsir.
- Have Google Scholar accounts (Especially if you have a Scopus ID).
- Ready to work voluntarily without getting rewarded.
- Registration form via https://bit.ly/3O9PAwV
For manuscript submission, you can go directly through our website https://journal.sadra.ac.id/ojs/index.php/tanzil
Egi Sukma Baihaki, M.Hum.
Editor in Chief of Tanzil: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran
Is it ok to check Plagiarism multiple times using Turnitin or any other software?
Some of my friends said plagiarism checking was allowed only twice. If we check for plagiarism a third time, it will be considered plagiarism and the data will be stored in cloud while plagiarism. Is it true?
How many times I can check my research article for plagiarism using software?
I was looking for research papers that have employed descriptive statistics to analyse quantitative data which are mostly categorical/dichotomous variables and thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data in a sequential explanatory mixed methods research.
Trying to look up an journal article in the International Journal of Vegetable Science, 24(3), 292-304.
what is best way to do this?
What are the main differences between publishing in high-scoring scientific journals and low-scoring or no points?
The scientist tries to publish in high-ranked places but he is not always able to publish in other journals, which are low-scoring or without points. It depends on the field in which it operates scientifically, how many scientific journals are scored in a given field and what are the requirements and limitations.
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

I recently got this message with a rejection to upload a preprint to ArXiv which is currently published in a peer-reviewed Q3 journal:
"While we acknowledge that this article has been published, our moderators determined it is not of plausible interest for inclusion within arXiv. As a result, this submission has been declined."
Do moderators in ArXiv act as professional and authorized reviewers for whatever subject the paper is submitted to their website?
As a research scholar, I feel that a lot of time is wasted in preparing a manuscript according to a journal format. The worst part is that if the paper gets desk rejected, then we have to prepare the manuscript in some other journal style. A lot of time is wasted in this cycle.
When the paper can be type set by the journal after getting accepted, then why dont journal allow a general free format submission.
#I_support_free_format_submission
Dear Researchers.
I'd like to invite researchers from least developed countries to be part of our Academic Collaboration Network. We are into journal article collab nexus. If interrested, please email your CV link to: seminaron9@gmail.com
Thanks.
Hi everyone! I got an invitation to submit a paper to the following SCI-E/SCOPUS MDPI journal (special issue):
The Article Processing Charge (APC) is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs) per accepted paper. However, the fees will be fully waived (as it is an invitation to contribute) if I can submit the paper by the end of June 2020.
If anyone have a collaboration idea, please send me a message.
AI (Artificial Intelligence) is rapidly expanding and entered every sector with almost mixed reactions for its utility. Kindly share some views backed up by strong examples.
I have a doctoral student who wants to use a validated instrument about Leadership Skills from a journal article, but can't reach the authors - mail returned. What should she do now? Of course she would cite the article and the authors and article in her dissertation - but is this ok to do?
Also -- any other suggestions of sites that have validated instruments to use?
It seems I need statistical background or data that is primary research to be used for journal articles. Where do I find it? Do I conduct a research survey to test hypothesis? How are researchers going about this process? What resources or tools do you have, if any? Thanks.
PhD students should not be solely judged by the number of journal articles they have produced. While publications are a critical measure of a PhD's productivity and contribution to their field, they are not the only indicator of success or ability.
PhD students should be evaluated on the quality of their work, their critical thinking skills, their ability to solve problems, and their contribution to their discipline in general. These factors can be considered in evaluating their contributions, whether or not these contributions are made in the form of publications.
Additionally, many doctoral students face challenges such as funding, access to data, and time constraints that may limit their ability to produce journal articles. These limitations can result in the prioritization of other modes of scholarship such as conference opportunities, poster presentations, patent applications, data sharing, and policy briefs, which are equally valuable.
Ultimately, the doctoral process and its evaluation should be viewed as a holistic process with an emphasis on professional development, creation of new knowledge, and producing work of high quality across a range of relevant platforms.
May anyone please share material on use of implementation strategy in public health?
How do we assess the feasibility and scalability of proposed intervention?
Kindly please share viewpoints and journal articles on these topic
I conduct research in the field of molecular oncology and, in addition to the main research article, I have accumulated some data for a summary, literally 4-5 pages (the grant is ending soon, so there is no possibility to conduct a full-scale study). Which, in this case, is it better to choose the type of articles - communication or brief report? Any significant differences?
Your opinion?
Good time, dear, I need a journal article clarivate about cancer, immunology, and molecular biology and is easy to accept. PhD student and final year thanks and best regards
Does it mean, I can access published journal articles from ScienceDirect and Scopus? If that is possible/yes, what were the procedures?
If we posted a research paper on ResearchSquare before it got officially published in a journal, and then the journal rejects it because it's already available as a pre-print and has a high similarity index with the same pre-print. What can we do to handle this situation?
Thank you
Hi,
I'd like to publish my already published journal article as a book. My article was published under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Is it possible to also find a well-known publisher who would publish my article? A couple of months back, a publisher from India offered to publish my article under a Creative Commons Attribution license as a text book in India, however, I declined their offer as I didn't trust the authenticity of their publications.
My question is: are their other well-known publishers who might publish my article, preferably in the Western world? As the publisher from India showed interest in publishing my article for their text book, I am very keen to know. Could you please also suggest some publishers, if possible?
My article examines how social media (SM) activeness affects the work-life balance of Bangladeshi white collar work force and suggests measures to reduce their negative and reinforce their positive aspects. Primary research has been conducted using an online questionnaire-based survey using judgement sampling. The study recommends several measures to reinforce the positive impacts and reduce the negative ones, and it was published in the SciMedCentral Archives of Palliative Care journal.
Citation: Mujeri, N. (2021). Social Media Activeness and Work-Life Balance in the Bangladesh Context: A Descriptive Study. Archives of Palliative Care.
Attached: journal article for your viewing.
Would it be possible to publish this journal article as a book? Would it impact the willingness of an editor to publish my work as a book? What do you think?
It would be great to hear your experience about publishing articles from your previously published journal articles and then making it into a book.
Thank you!
Neaz Mujeri
Hi everyone one
I want to write article in digital marketing field but I have some problems.
We are in Iran and we have alot of barriers to do this for international journals.
I need someone to help me and together do this article and send it for international journals.
Help us if you can.
Best regards.
Hello,
Please, can I have some journal/articles on the above topic?
Thank you
In my reading of the literature, I found the repeating of the same information concerning both the theories of 1st Language and 2nd Language Acquisition . I am a bit confused about the inclusion of these theories in both L1A and L2A . I need more clarification by providing me with references from books or Journal Articles. I am looking forward to hearing from this online Community of Researchers and Scholars.
Best ,
What should be the criteria to choose a journal for publication? Either impact factor or quartile rank or any other?
What do you suggest?
What, in your opinion, is a reliable, objective, professional and thus really contributing to the effective development of science reviewing of scientific papers, diploma theses, dissertations containing the results of scientific research, text proposals sent to the editorial office for publication as scientific publications, including scientific articles, scientific monographs, etc.?
The reviewing of scientific articles by scientists specialised in a particular field of knowledge, conducted in the editorial process, is essential for maintaining a high level of scientific publications and for the development of scientific journals. However, there are times when it can be problematic and cumbersome for scientists who work in narrow, specific specialisations, fields, scientific disciplines.
On the one hand, it is widely accepted that the evaluation of a scientific paper during the peer review process should take into account and usually does take into account at least a dozen factors concerning both substantive issues, research, reference to the literature, timeliness of research results, correctness of inference, editorial quality, effects on the development of science, etc. The assessment of a scientific work during peer review should be carried out objectively, independently, fairly, according to a high level of assessment standards. Therefore, editorial activity, proofreading, editorial correction, scientific reviews, etc. should be carried out according to the applicable standards in order to maintain a certain level of scientific quality of published scientific work.
On the other hand, on the discussion forum of this Research Gate portal, many questions arise regarding the issue of objectivity and fairness in reviewing scientific papers. Yes, the processes of reviewing scientific texts proposed for publication is a serious issue. The issue of the level of objectivity and independence of reviewing scientific papers can influence the direction of science in narrow specialisations and scientific disciplines. The significant variation in the standards of reviewing processes, editorial processes, etc. between different editors of journals and other types of scientific publications is an important factor in considering the issue of the level of objectivity and the problems that arise in this regard. In order for the editorial and reviewing process to be fully objective and independent, among other things, institutional affiliation should not influence the editors' decision to publish a scientific paper and the assessment in the review of the text, manuscript by the reviewers. Unfortunately, however, it sometimes happens that institutional affiliation is taken into account in such situations.
An important element of maintaining a certain level of objectivity in the reviewing process of scientific papers is the application of the model of more than one review in the editorial boards of scientific journals and editorial boards of book publications and monographs, i.e. the standard of min. Two reviews written independently by other researchers and scientists operating in a given discipline of knowledge and/or who are recognised experts in a given issue. Consequently, the multi-review model is important as it should contribute to the improvement of scientific texts. The double (two reviews) review process for scientific papers raises the issue of the objectivity of the review process and is an important element of the editorial process. In some editorial boards of scientific journals and editorial boards of book publications and monographs, the model of 3 reviews is also applied, in which the third review plays an auxiliary and sometimes a decisive role in relation to the previous two reviews written, in which significantly different assessments appeared, different points of view on the given issue described in the reviewed scientific work.
In addition, there are other factors that are important for researchers and scientists, such as the length of the review process of submitted text proposals for publication and the period after which they receive a response from the editorial office. Sometimes the review and editorial processes take a long time. This is determined by various factors. During the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic, organising conferences in a traditional, desktop format and post-referral publication processes were difficult. An important issue is the communication standards in place in a given scientific publication editorial board. These standards can also vary widely, as some editorial offices write back with an e-mail response regarding the results of an evaluation, a review conducted, an editorial correction or feedback confirming receipt of a text, etc., within a period of several days or so after the text has been sent to the editorial office publishing a particular scientific text. However, there are also editors who write back with a response much later. For scientists and researchers, waiting a long time for a reply can be problematic in a situation where they are continuing their research in a particular field of knowledge, they are receiving new, new research results and the field or scientific discipline in which they are conducting research is developing rapidly.
The issues of the length of the review process, the process of editing a manuscript proposal submitted for publication, the issue of communication between the editorial office and the manuscript author may also be related to the acceptance by authors of journals that are not highly ranked in terms of recognition, reputation, Impact Factor, etc. If journals with a high Impact Factor are difficult to access due to the long review process and high publication costs, some researchers and scientists who want to publish their research results quickly publish in journals without Impact Factor. In addition, some journals without Impact Factor have other positive features, such as the inclusion of published articles in many scientific publication indexing databases and all this under the open access formula without any payment.
In the context of the issue at hand, the editorial requirements set by the editors of scientific journals for the preparation of articles and other texts for publication are also relevant. On the one hand, the standards of reviewing and editorial requirements sometimes vary widely between journals. On the other hand, meeting all editorial requirements in full may limit the issue of innovation in terms of the research conducted and its description and presentation in scientific publications. This is a complex issue that affects many scientific fields, the research conducted and the description of its results in specific types of scientific publications written according to the editorial standards of specific editors and scientific publishers.
Another issue of discussion in the context of the reviewing process of scientific texts is the progressive digitisation of documents. This process should encourage remote communication via e.g. email, and should assist in the editorial process concerning preparatory work prior to the publication of scientific texts. The issue of the progressive digitisation of documents and their increasingly automated digital processing is linked to the use of new ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0, including artificial intelligence, e.g. technology similar to ChatGPT to improve computerised applications and Internet-connected anti-plagiarism platforms used to verify texts during the process of reviewing scientific texts. I wrote about this issue in one of the previously formulated questions on my discussion forum of this Research Gate portal.
Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to the discussion of scientific issues and not the ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
What, in your opinion, consists in a reliable, objective, professional and thus really contributing to the effective development of science reviewing of scientific works, theses, dissertations containing the results of scientific research, text proposals sent to the editorial office for publication as scientific publications, including scientific articles, scientific monographs, etc.?
In your opinion, what is a reliable, objective, professional review of scientific papers, theses, etc.?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

What is the difference between a journal article and a conference paper?
Can you give me examples?
Hi anyone using typeset for formatting journal articles? Is it worth taking subscription. If any one using please provide your thoughts
Is it legal to give people access to the published journal articles that I have? thanks, Sally
Why are we finding journal articles that use more and more numbered citation style instead of "Author, year" citation?
This is very annoying as while we read, we need to go back all time to the referencing to see who and when this is said


My masters dissertation was a thematic analysis which split neatly into two major themes. I have permission from the journal I'm publishing with to publish in two seperate articles. Whilst large sections of the dissertation seperate neatly into two seperate articles, some segments of the introduction, literature review, methedology and discussion don't.
I'd really appreciate any examples of thematic analysis dissertations which were split into two journal articles as examples. Or alternately advice on spreading the remaining content out over two articles (or if I should alternately condense the material remaining).
Many thanks in advance!
As we know, there exist a section called Abstracting/Indexing of a particular Journal where you can know whether the Journal is SCI/SCIE/ESCI/SCOPUS etc. But if the mentioned section is not listed there on the Journal home site, how do we know its Abstracting/Indexing? Please let me know if any alternatives are available.
Good morning, I am trying to locate scholarly journal articles on best ways to assist learners who have missed or gaps in learning. I am devising a program that will keep learners on a continued path of academic matriculation while still catching them up on foundational concepts missed earlier in life.
Dear Сolleagues,
there is often a mood to write more than a thesis (4 pages), but less than an article (8-10 pages). Such short articles in most cases are of the Letter type. As examples of quality journals that are focused on publishing such articles, I can mention
Please advise high-quality journals (i.e. with a Q1-Q3 quartile in Scopus) oriented towards the publication of Letter-type articles. I am primarily interested in journals with a focus on applied mathematics, computer science and engineering.
Thank you for every meaningful response.
I would be eager to familiarize myself with your beloved journal articles or book chapters dealing with how political agency is constructed, transformed, and negotiated in IR through communication.
I am particularly interested in the contributions that focus on:
- performative approaches to agency;
- moral agency;
- constructing agency in times of security crises.
Thank you in advance!
Many publishers and journals displays their average review time on their websites. However, the IEEE and ACM journals do not display this information. Any of you have this information?
I got an invite to join SciPinion and I can't tell if it is a predatory journal or not. Anybody have experience with them?
The email opened with this: "Your peers have identified you as an expert in your field and you have been invited to join our highly respected scientific community. Please claim your account!" and then went and ended with: "We believe your inclusion in our community strengthens our mission and our collective goal as scientists to find the truth, we would very much appreciate your insights. Your participation in any of this may remain completely anonymous at your discretion."
Like R core team citation, I'm so confused about Past3 citation
hello friends
iam looking for some answers and discussion of this question. a supporting journal article to answer this question will be very appreciated
thank you
Please recommend some methodological literature on quantitative method, survey, etc. please no textbook ! thank you!
Dear RG community
I am writing the final paper of my Ph.D. thesis.
My final contributions are related to each other; I wanted to express both of these contributions in one article. Still, the number of pages increased significantly, so I want to publish the article in two parts. The first part and the second part, do you think this is possible?
I wanted to know what the protocol for a two parts article is.
I would be happy if you could explain how to write an article in two separate parts.
Hi guys,
I might be publishing my Master's dissertation paper and my supervisor adjusted my data and now 2 of my constructs' cronbach's alpha are 0.6.
I have been looking for a good journal article where their cronbach's alpha values were 0.6 to see how they present it and also use it as a reference but I cannot find one. I have a lot of articles stating that 0.6 to 0.7 is the lower level of acceptability, however I have not found any articles using less than 0.7 values.
Any suggestions?
Is writing a book chapter equivalent to writing a book or journal article? Can you consider yourself as an author of a book when you only written a book chapter?
Hi,
I conducted a study and published in a book chapter. Can I reprint it in a Scopus/web of Science journal? If so, which journal do you recommend?
Hello
I am developing a hypothesised model based on a theoretical framwork in a conceptual paper, but I only want to use part of the framework and add something new in the model. Does anyone know if this is okay? If so, coudl you show me any journal articles that did this?
I would love to hear about any materials you have found helpful and have inspired you to suggest to graduate students, doctoral students, researchers, and academicians to read for understanding or for refreshing their knowledge on research methodology and emerging research methods in social science (or management in specific but not necessary). These can be anything, for example, new books, classic books, and journal articles.
I hope the answers will help to create a comprehensive list of suggested readings on Research Methodology and Research Methods that would be helpful to anyone interested. Thank you!!
Research trends are in many cases impacted by the gate-keeper's attitude or approval of a prospective research paper. The majority of those gate-keepers are specialized chief editors, editors, and reviewing-scholars in their fields.
Is it justified that a research paper gets rejected based on the criteria of being/not being fashionable or popular in the field?
Would you go with the current in order to get pass, or would you rather be concerned with saying your word in the field? Supposing that there are evidences for both the popular and the "not fashionable attitude nowadays".
I'm in the humanities, researching American poetry.
Thanks for your comments!
Scientific American January 2023 Issue has an article by H. Pontzer, New Human Metabolism Research Upends Conventional Wisdom about How We Burn Calories.
The Sci Am article asserts the statement in the question above.
Do you know what journal articles support or establish that statement, that basic processes of metabolism remain the same in both males and females?
Hello Researchers,
I am considering publishing a Case Study report on Cross-cultural and Comparative Analysis of Leadership Styles on Australia and Bangladesh in an international open-access journal for international business. I had received a high distinction for this report in my MCom program at an Australian university. I would like to ask you all about the possible format of the report for publication, I would like to ask for your recommendation on the matter.
I wrote the report focusing on Comparative and cross-cultural leadership styles between Bangladesh and Australia. The two cultural models I chose were Hoffsteid and Globe study.
Since the report was written in the Case Study format and most international journals use the traditional journal article format, do you think it would be better to reformat the report into a traditional journal article format (Intro, Lit. Review, Rationale, Research Methods, Main Body, Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendations)?
Or do you think there is scope for publishing it in a Case Study format? I know Case Study articles are popular in Medical journals, but not sure if there are any Case Study international journals in the fields of international business and management.
Please let me know your opinion at your earliest convenience.
Warmest Regards,
Neaz
There are some journal articles that reported well diffusion method to determine the antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles. Meanwhile, some reported disc diffusion method. Which method is suitable for this purpose?
Hello,
I am wondering if cell doubling times are universal or do they depend on factors such as plate / flask size? I ask because I've searched some journal articles differ in doubling time of the same cells...
I mean, I would think that they won't change... because doubling time is a part of their nature is it not?
Thanks
Are we really considering the needs of our students when writing journal articles?
Dear connections,
I am currently involved in a project examining the BODY LANGUAGE OF ELITE COACHES and its potential influence on athletes. However, there seem to be a lack of instruments enabling to systematically analyse both (1) facial expressions and (2) gestural language, specifically in coaching.
If you could direct me to any journal articles who have employed (validated) INSTRUMENTS to systematically assess NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION in TEACHING, COACHING, OR OTHER AREAS; it would massively help.
Regards,
Pablo
I often find that some articles have sepatate literature review but others lack . What is the better way to present literature? Could you share your ideas?
Hi, Anyone help me with how we can use quantum computing in agriculture, any journal articles or any methods which are useful about quantum computing in agriculture help me to start research on quantum computing and agriculture.
Many universities around the world strongly recommend their academic staff to publish in international journals with high impact factor rather than writing books!
As an old generation academic, I believe that book publications can elaborate more scholarly thoughts and provide more examples. However, due to the limited space for international journal articles (word count: about 4000-6000 English words) and efficient circulation of international journal papers, the details are omitted. For what cogent reasons should we follow or should we reject this recommendation? Is the quality of journal-focused supervision deteriorating? If so, why so? If not so, why not so?
Recently, some universities in some regions of the world are making an effort to use a list of published international journal articles with related research interests on the same research topic as a substitute for a doctoral dissertation (e.g., DBA, EMBA, EdD)? 1. If this is a trend, what would be the implications for the quality of the Ph.D. degree? Are there major implications for higher education? 2. If not, what are the general skills involved in writing a dissertation that differ from those involved in writing international journal articles, or vice versa? 3. What pedagogical skills should the supervisor of a dissertation or journal article have? Are there any similarities or differences? 4. Should doctoral students write a dissertation or write a stack of journal articles to replace the doctoral dissertation? What are the considerations/values behind this? Please brainstorm or share your own ideas with your fellow students / colleagues. By Percy Kwok
Hello
I just recently submitted to a reputable journal in my field, and after almost 2 weeks of the submission the editor offered a transfer to an oppen acces journal without sending it to reviewers
Firstly I accepted the transferred decision by mistake but after that I withdraw the manuscript from the system.
Now I chose to submit the manuscript to another journal under the same academic publishing company but not recommended by the first journal and my question is should I mention the transferred decision made by the first journal in the cover letter or not ?