Questions related to Interpersonal
For my research I want tot test the influence of distance according to Hall's (1966) interpersonal distances (intimate, personal, social and public) on facial expression (negative or positive). Since both my independent and dependent variable are categorical ordinal data I thought of using Spearman's correlation. Is that the right statistical method?
I am in the process of developing an SJT a new instrument for assessing adults who assist others in managing their emotions. This instrument would measure the emotional management performance by focusing on the extrinsic interpersonal emotional manager of others' emotional skills and abilities. Specifically, examining a person’s emotional intelligence as an ability, their level of confidence and influence towards emotionally managing others, and their ability to select and implement a suitable emotional regulatory strategy. The interpersonal emotion extrinsic literature informs the development of this tool.
The process of SJTs appear be quite a rigorous process and requires solid psychometrics. This is clear from discussion and literature. However, I cannot find information about how to ensure I have a fair and reliable tool.
Can anyone help with how ensure I have a fair and reliable tool? What are those SJT requirements for this? What is a viable sample size to test SJTs items for experts? And for those who are not experts in the subject area what is a viable sample size?
What are available literatures on SJTs development related to emotion regulation or interpersonal emotion regulation or emotional intelligence?
What are the most appropriate test analysis for SJTs for determine validity and reliability? I am assuming factor analyses is approach, is this correct?
When is it appropriate to retest SJTs and what are appropriate intervals between tests?
Any help with these questions as well as available literatures supporting answers is appreciated.
Is anyone out there aware of research that has sought to establish the relationship between Spanish learners' scores on the ACTFL Proficiency Placement Test (APPT) and their scores on the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI)?
I realize that the APPT is not meant to determine official proficiency levels at all, but I'm curious as to how well the APPT, as an instrument of reading and listening interpretive proficiency, can predict oral interpersonal proficiency. If there is research on these exact instruments, or on how well interpretive proficiency can serve as a predictor for interpersonal proficiency in general, that would be great.
About using joysticks for interpersonal interaction coding, I found some examples after reading Pennings et al. (2014) and Haataja et al. (2021) research. This coding method is subjective, it depends on the observer but I can not find the specific protocol or standards on how to train observers for joystick method.
Will the social and psychological aspects of interpersonal contacts and customer needs in this matter be a barrier to the creation of fully automated electronic banks without staff?
Will one of the products of Industry 4.0 be the creation of fully automated electronic banks without staff?
Theoretically, it may be possible, however, do banks' clients expect it?
At the end of the twentieth century, publications appeared that confirmed this type of thesis and suggested that the development of banking is heading in this direction, ie towards full automation and electronization, remote service through the Internet of clients of financial institutions. However, at the beginning of the 21st century, the situation is changing.
Despite the development of artificial intelligence, intenet of things etc. and the use of new information technologies, eg for the creation of automated electronic advisers, electronic avatars simulating a bank employee or other financial institution providing advice to a client served via a website, some of the bank clients do not want to part with a counselor in the person of a man, not a machine.
In connection with the above, will the social and psychological aspects of interpersonal contacts and customer needs in this matter be a barrier to the creation of fully automated electronic banks without staff?
Do you agree with me on the above matter?
In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:
Will the social and psychological aspects of interpersonal contacts and customer needs in this matter be a barrier to the creation of fully automated electronic banks without staff?
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
I am an undergrad student working on a research project to investigate whether data collected via an online questionnaire produces similar results as when the data is collected in-person. I collected all the online data I needed, however since I am working with a rare population, I haven't been able to collect in-person data. Therefore, I am relying on past studies in the literature to find in person data to compare to my online data, and ultimately to examine the validity of my online data.
My dilemma is this:
I administered an interpersonal support survey, the ISEL-12, online to my rare patient population. I now want to find a study in the literature that administered a similar survey on interpersonal support using face-to-face rather than online methods, and compare the results. Unfortunately, I was unable find any instances of the ISEL-12 being administered in person to my rare population in the literature, but I was able to find a study that utilized a different interpersonal support questionnaire, the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA).
Given that I only have summary statistics like mean and standard deviation from the study I found in the literature (no raw data), and the two questionnaires are on different scales, how can I compare the RSA data to the ISEL-12 data I collected myself? As a reminder, my ultimate goal is to conclude that interpersonal support data collected in person is similar to interpersonal support data collected online. I know I could use a Z-test to compare online ISEL-12 data to in person ISEL-12 data... but in the case of comparing online ISEL-12 data to in person RSA data, could a Z-test still work or no? Is there anything else I could try?
When comparing both GDP loss and mortality across countries, it appears that countries that have managed to save more lives during the Covid-19 pandemic have also managed to save their economies better. What accounts for these stark differences in country performances? In this article, we argue that a salient feature of economic and health performance is the degree of trust populations have in their governments. We set up a heuristic analytical framework that models this relation, under particular assumptions about what drives government and individual behavior, in order to better understand the mechanisms that may be at work. We identify three key roles that trust in government may play in enforcing social distancing policies, conveying credible information for individual decision-making, and shaping government attitudes towards risk. We argue that these implications are consistent with the empirical evidence. We also discuss the relevance of other forms of trust, namely, interpersonal trust and trust in science.
For more :
I am currently working on a project titled 'How does internet use affect interpersonal trust, a comparison across 4 European countries'. However, I have been struggling with deciding on which model best suits my project, as both my dependent variable, interpersonal trust and main independent variable are ordinal. ie: Interpersonal trust ranges from 0 "You can't be too careful" through to 10 "Most people can be trusted" and the variable internet use frequency ranges from 1 "Never" 2 "Only Occasionally" 3 "A few times a week" 4 "Most days" 5 "Everyday". I was wondering if there is a model that I could use that would be suited to this, or whether I would need to recode my variable for internet use? Also seeing as I will be composing a cross country analysis, what model would also be suitable for this? I am working with stata so any advice on how to do this in stata would also be greatly appreciated.
I am looking for a mindful parenting scale to use with a cohort of parents (predominately mothers) who have personality disorder related difficulties, with a preference for measures with less than 20 items.
I have thought about using the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting (IEM-P) scale (10 items) and would appreciate hearing anyones experiences with using this scale, or suggestions for an alternative.
For many years now, I fail to find the original source of a concept in social theory that distinguishes between four or five 'levels' of analysis and/or intervention. Various versions are circulating, but they all more or less boil down to the following:
1. content (what),
2. procedure (how),
3. interpersonal (here & now dynamics in the actual situation),
4. intrapersonal (of the/an individual), and
5. hypothetical factors of which the actors are not (yet) conscious. The best guess so far is Brendan Reddy, who paints an 'iceberg' image with 'levels' 1 and 2 above and the others below the surface (see 1994: Intervention Skills - Process Consultation for Small Groups and Teams). My current hypothesis is that he developed this concept for his work at the National Training Laboratories in Bethel, Maine. Yet, there is no definitive evidence and in spite of many attempts I haven't succeeded in locating people who would be able to confirm or falsify my hunch.
I am looking to find out if support workers health literacy has a positive or negative effect on their charges when they are being supported at home, what the carers think their level of health literacy is and how this relates to interpersonal and integrated relationships within the wider medical support network for the learning disabled.
HA4: Interpersonal political discussions significantly mediate the influence of exposure to radio on women voters’ electoral participation.
HA4.1: Interpersonal political discussions significantly mediate the effect of the frequency of listening to radio on women voters’ electoral participation.
HA4.2: Interpersonal political discussions significantly mediate the influence of political knowledge on women voters’ electoral participation.
Framing theory suggests that how something is presented to the audience so that they draw the "right" conclusion to help us accomplish our objectives in life. This packaging is a pervasive feature of interpersonal behaviour and may be done via framing.
I am struggling to find what the measure/operationalisation of social, interpersonal and consider dimension is for Acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale. I know that Acceptance of Cosmetic surgery scales measurement is ACSS. Can anyone please tell me what this is for social, interpersonal and consider dimension subscales? I also do not know what Attractive Appearance subscales measures are for Aspiration Index (AI) can someone please tell me what this is? (I am guessing here but is it AA OR AI_AA??)
As part of an intervention that aims to develop trust between members of group who work together to achieve a common goal, I'm looking for ways to measure trust and to track changes over time.
Would love to hear your thoughts and to have references for appropriate measurements. Thanks!
The eight forms of intelligence defined by Howard Gardner (1985) are:
”1. Verbal / linguistic intelligence
2. Logical / mathematical intelligence
3. Body / kinesthetic intelligence
4. Space intelligence
5. Musical Intelligence
6. Interpersonal Intelligence
7. Intrusive Intelligence
8. Natural Intelligence”
Many special thanks!
Hi everyone! I was wondering if anyone might have any ideas of how to conduct some potential analyses for some research I am working on. I am interested in the moderating role of trait emotion regulation on the relationship between state anxiety prior to solving an interpersonal problem (predictor) and problem solving in a real-life interpersonal problem (outcome). I want to hypothesize that individuals with high levels of state anxiety perform well if they also have good emotion regulation skills, but individuals with high levels of state anxiety do not perform as well if they do not have as good of emotion regulation skills. I have used diary cards for participants to track interpersonal problems that they have faced (the responses are coded) as well as their state anxiety level prior to trying to solve the problem. Each participant rated their state anxiety prior to 4 interpersonal problems that they faced (predictor) and wrote about how they solved that problem (outcome). They filled out one measure about trait emotion regulation skills. I have a sample of 50 participants right now. I do not think I can treat each scenario as if it were a different participant (then I would have a sample of 200 because 4 scenarios per participant and there are 50 participants) and run a test of moderation once. Is there a way to do some kind of repeated measures moderation without averaging participants' scores (this would defeat the purpose of looking at state-anxiety)? Should I just run four different moderation analyses, one for the first scenario, one for the second scenario, and so on? Or is there a way I could use a repeated measures ANOVA to look for an interaction? I don't think it makes conceptual sense to treat the first scenario recorded any differently from the second scenario because there were no experimental manipulations to create hypothesized differences for scenario 1, 2, 3, and 4. I hope this makes sense. I look forward to hearing what anyone has to say!
So with the CSII and it's 2 dimensions, the normative and the informational, you have a way to measure it's influence on purchase intention. If with the informational dimension you measure one's inclination to accept information from others as a validation of reality, you are thereby influenced and your intention is changed. So if I measure high on the scale I will be very influenced to buy. But can't this dimension used to measure anything else? If I measure a price variable, can't it influence it too? If I am verys susceptable to price and I score high on the informational dimension, can´t I assume that for that particular variable I am very susceptable to be influenced, therefore if anyone wanted to influence me via marketing all they had to do was press that matter?
I had the base from somewhere but stupidly didn't take note of it and I am unable to replicate the search.
I am searching for a scale which measures the tendency to interpersonal/emotional conflict avoidance (I do not mean cognitive controversies). Would be very happy if someone can help!
Batson and Week has worked on the mood effects of unsuccessful helping (1996), Chikovani et al. has worked on empathy cost (2015) and Stocks, Lopez-Pérez, and Oceja about distress, empathy et rumination (2016). We know now the negative effect of the personal distress and the empathy, but how the empathic person perceives a victim or a person in the need when the subject/agent is helplessness/powerless ? When the level of personal distress can not decrease. Do we know the impacts at the interpersonal level ?
I am planning an empirical research on stress in teachers. The question I face is: how to differentiate the causes of stress in teachers? How to understand, if the high levels of stress anxiety and depression are causes by occupational stress or by other stress factors (family factors, interpersonal or intrapersonal conflicts, developmental crisis, etc.). Should I include all these questions in the questionnaire? Is it possible to separate occupational stress from external influences?
It's simple to find literature describing the dark tetrad traits (sadism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy). But what I have not been able to locate thus far is research on resisting the dark tetrad: what strategies are most effective, interpersonally and socially, for limiting their negative impact.
How can we teach undergraduate students about interpersonal and social skills so that they can be more empowered to manage assignments and projects that demand teamwork or cooperation among them? I would like to explore more about the possible strategies used to empower students on interpersonal and social skills.
I am using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems - Circumplex (IIP-C) with 32 items.
I used the IRI scale in a study and cannot find in papers the mimimum and maximum scores of this scale. Also, I would like to know if there are some cut-off scores, determining excessive lower or higher scores.
Thank you very much for your help,
A colleague and I are in need of collaboration with a psychologist knowledgeable with current sophisticated statistics. In part, we wish to perform a multi-factorial analysis on an Interpersonal Attitudes test with 180 items and a N of several hundred. We wish to relate it to attachment research findings. Initially, this is to validate the instrument, which incidentally is clinically powerful in therapy. About half of the tests were done by police officer candidates.
Next we want to use it and some other measures to track interpersonal attitudes and community policing effectiveness in police officers over the first 5 years of their careers. We would like to see policing improve relationships within communities. So, plan includes officer selection as well as adjusting the field training and supervision.
Can some one suggest me scales on variable Interpersonal Injustice & Interpersonal Distrust In context of workplace?
Interpersonal or interactional metadiscourse was designed for the analysis of academic genres in English (Vande Kopple 1985, Crismore et al. 1993, Hyland & Tse 2004, Hyland 2005, 2008). The scope of texts being subject to this analysis has widened with time, including not only academic but also professional and social genres of different domains. The result of these analyses has challenged the general methodological framework, suggesting new perspectives that can develop it with theoretical and socio-linguistic implications (Suau Jiménez 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017). A re-framing of the model would possibly be necessary if we want it to cater for new research in a variety of genres, domains and languages.
I'm looking for a 'frequency distribution' of emotions that people experience when interacting with other people. Any leads to relevant peer-reviewed empirical work?
I'm thinking of whether there are certain linguistic strategies, perhaps specifically with some relation to Halliday's interpersonal metafunction, to boost an employee's work efficiency and satisfaction. Any comment around this field would really be appreciated
I am discussing my results for an upcoming conference presentation on the determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among adults with diabetes. My results is showing that higher levels of interpersonal sensitivity is a predictor for HRQoL. Can any one offer me some reasons why this is possible? Any previous studies will be much helpful.
For my masters in health research, I am exploring differences in factors seen as faciliators or barriers to return to work following acquired brain injury between professional/managerial and non professional/managerial jobs.
I feel I have made a novices blunder, as I am struggling to find a reference on which to base my incl/exclu criteria for professional/managerial jobs as the taxonomies i have come accross are based more on industry than career level.
I know that i want to compare careers that usually require higher level education and/ or where there is responsibility for managing others, but now Im questioning whether i should put these two catergories together. My assumption is that these jobs will have higher cognitive and interpersonal demands, but now I am questioning even that! any thoughts/advice would be appreciated.
Can anyone recommend a good tool to gauge the degree of interpersonal interaction between an interviewer and a respondent? I am interested in both affective and effectiveness measures. Many thanks.
in interpersonal metafunction of Systemic Functional Grammar of Hallidayan approach mood and modality are central to judge the attitude of speaker and narrator in proposition or proposal. I need some help and material by this model.