Information Dissemination - Science topic

Hello, Iyar Lin!

Sounds interesting. Can we talk about this?

I am currently working on research applying the AHP Method to a group of indicators to improve a method (VERSALTO) that I created to plan and analyze the communication macro strategy and marketing KPIs for the infoproduct launch process.

Furthermore, I am an Industrial Engineer, working in the Brazilian Navy, developing myself in the area of ​​Operational Research.

It would be a pleasure to talk with you.

Best regards,

L.C. Andrade.

Teşekkür ederim!

While blockchain technology offers significant security advantages for data sharing, it's not immune to attacks. Here are some ways attacks can occur during data sharing on a blockchain:

It's important to remember that blockchain technology is constantly evolving, and developers are addressing potential vulnerabilities. Implementing best practices for data security, choosing robust platform and protocols, and raising user awareness can help mitigate risks and ensure secure data sharing on a blockchain.

Hi all

I've added all your suggestions to the list of Design Journals and created a clickable table of categories for easier search:

Please feel free to add and share.

The categories include:

Interesting.

I personally am for data sharing, but I also use almost exclusively secondary data. Since shortly after my first publications, I have included a link in every publication to a website where I upload all of my data, code, and log files. I think transparency is important in research. Having replicated studies before, I find that minor decisions made can change the ultimate conclusions or some research is just not replicable (for whatever reason).

If you want to work in a true “scientific” pursuit of knowledge then it should not matter if others have access to the data. It is all in pursuit of knowledge and understanding of whatever phenomenon we study. If someone else gets to a paper before me, even using data I collected, then so be it. If they answer the question I wanted to know the answer to, great thank you.

Never collaborate or share data because it will be stolen and you will lose control of the study. Try to publish on your own and then your articles will be more creative and elegant and keep your data confidential, even from supervisors, until after publication in HI journals :)

Sure! There are several other methodologies that can be used to preserve privacy when sharing data in cloud computing, besides multi-party access control:

These are just a few of the methods that can be used to preserve privacy when sharing data in cloud computing. Each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the most effective approach will depend on the specific needs of each organization and the data being shared.

follow me here : https://www.instagram.com/_sh_aon_/

Mendel showed that flower colour in pea plants can be inherited. The flower in the centre is a cross between the pink flower and the white flower.

Dear @Adam L Vanwert

I would like to quote Gregor Mendel's "Experiments on plant hybridization" which he presented to the Natural History

Society of Brno (now in the Czech Republic) in 1865. Needless to mention that Mendel was a careful scientist; cautious, patient and committed to data. These qualities allowed him to make discoveries that have stood the test of time. Although Mendel had no knowledge of genes, chromosomes or genomes, he laid the foundations for genetics. What he reported can be reproduced anywhere by any biologist. We value and remember his findings.

Research reproducibility is now not so common. "Modern" researchers make narratives first; then they want data to fit their narratives. Mendel generated data through his carefully planned experiments and observation, and then tried to explain his findings, and hence, there is 100 percent reproducibility, and most of us value it.

yes intrested

Steffen Kaup actually It is described as being supported by representatives of science, business and administration from Germany and France, together with other European partners. The name of the project is derived from one of the first Greek deities, Gaia. but it may unwittingly constrain aspects of social behaviour.

I agree with Imran Anwar , in that want should always first seek permission to use the data and cite the researchers accordingly, but you one not include them as co-authors since the mere collection of data is insufficient to warrant this!

Also check..Where You at? Using GPS Locations in an Electronic Time Use ...

Thanks a lot! You confirm my first choice !

Have you checked this review paper

There have already been done studies with the same methodology you are planing:

When the sample size is large, naturally the error will get minimized. Further, if you collect data on relevant foraging variables, they should be subjected to tools such as PCA/ DFA, which will result in niche segregation.

Dear Sisay Chala,

A very good substantive question. During the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic, the scale of digitization and internationalization of remote communication processes, remote work, e-learning, online shopping and payments, etc., and many other aspects of communication processes, economic processes, increased, financial, social etc. The scale of using ICT, Internet and Industry 4.0 information technologies in these processes has increased. On the other hand, there are doubts whether the pace of improvement of cybercrime risk management systems, the risk of data transfer in the Internet, the risk of viruses and viruses and malware in smartphones used by users of the mobile internet banking application, etc. is keeping pace with the current progress determined by the increase in the digitization and Internetisation of communication processes. , economic, financial, social and other processes.

Best regards, Have a nice day, Stay healthy!

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Thomson reuters eikon financial database is mostly recommended. See log in link below:

Good luck!

it is going to differ according to the various models of delivery globally and resource availability. Has anyone explored the use of Open Dialogue?

Hi Sanaa,

Yu would usually check the website of the publisher or journal. In the UK you can see publisher policies on this website [ https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ ]. BW Matt

In your question you do not specify what tool you are using, for what type of study. Have you already tried using ROB-2? This is the new cochrane tool to assess risk of bias in randomized clinical trials. It is at: https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool?authuser=0

For observational studies you can use ROBINS-I.

Could you ask a more specific question? maybe I can help you

The dissemination of information on the results of scientific activities is currently carried out through new online media, databases indexing scientific publications, scientific social media portals (e.g. this Research Gate portal) and other new online media.

Greetings,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Hello Martin Knöll , this is an interesting idea. I have not looked into yet which data format / metadata will be useful for processing position data. We are now working on a Google Doc for BIDS specifications for motion data, which currently focuses on motion on smaller scale. Here is the link to Google Doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iaaLKgWjK5pcISD1MVxHKexB3PZWfE2aAC5HF_pCZWo/edit?usp=sharing and the thread on GitHub to give you an impression on how the discussion is developing https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/06-extensions.html

you can find the required transformer design parameters at

It will be hard to conduct group therapy virtually!

Hi Umaru,

Kindly follow the attached links good clue: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4919&context=libphilprac

and

Ákos Bede-Fazekas thanks! yes, i need raw data. I will try KNMI

Hi Soheil, please what do you mean in the same directory?

Thanks, Arturo

"How important is the sharing of personal data for persons with disabilities?" is a complex question.

Data, I believe can be categorized into three classes.

1 - Personal (The stuff I don't want others to see),

2 - Private (The stuff that's okay to share with some others - Groups),

3 - Public (The stuff anyone can view).

Having a disability can make this modern age more difficult to navigate.

Many disabled people(s), Myself being one of them, have a handicap (for lack of better words) that restricts them from living average digital life. Whether having a physical or mental disability governs how easily it is for them to pickup new technology, understand it, and/or drive it to the next level, and is greatly influenced by current technologies, finance, and their abilities to assimilate technology. Not without saying, this is in vast contrast to the non-disabled that take these issues for granted.

It is very important to me (Being a physically disabled middle aged man), for me to be able to access and share my ideas and knowledge, as well as be able to access knowledge of new or old Technology, that makes our lives more complex every day as technology grows. However, this forces us into an everlasting upward slope to take in these technologies. Not just to understand how to use them (Which makes our lives easier and harder at the same time), but to also understand how to fix them. It is hard enough for the older generation that have no understanding of new technologies (Which they would rather it stay that way, and is a disability in it's own right), but to have other disabilities makes it more necessary for disabled individuals to share and access data across a wide variety of mediums, than not.

Further, disabled people often have their disability get in the way of doing average every day things, let alone having to understand new technologies that can be challenging without a disability being involved, in it's own right.

So, I believe the question should be:

How important is the protection of and security from, and for them to be, in relation to them; sharing of personal data for persons with disabilities, and the aging?

After all, senior citizens are constantly being phished, smished, and duped into giving out their credit cards and social security numbers among other sensitive details that are needed to access financials. And the aging do not understand that simply telling someone your dog's name, to a hacker can be very dangerous if your password is your dog's name.

This age of technology gets more complicated each and every day. We struggle just to have a comprehensive working knowledge to be able to work with it. Disabilities get in the way of carrying groceries to my car, let alone trying to access E-mail when my sciatic nerve is acting up. We either adapt and overcome, or we are left by the way side of this amazing modern lifestyle intertwined with technology, even when we do not see it.

Dear Mohammed Alkhulaifi,

I suggest you to see links on topic.

Best regards

Following Arnaud Falchier !!

Thank you, Roberta. I will try it.

Hello dear Kaushalya Rathnayake .

I do not have data for share with you, but I could help you to analyze your data of flower visitors (perhaps with an approach at network level).

Regards,

Cristian

Acdemia is good resource like Researchgate

I agree with sir Amit, If your data has been published, i think its ok to share.

The issue of the possibility of publishing certain content, texts, banners, comments, etc. on the Internet and free information gathering are the key determinants of the development of information services on the Internet. On the other hand, the largest online technology corporations receive revenues mainly from paid marketing services. The Internet environment is therefore a kind of a mix of free and paid information and marketing services, which simultaneously, simultaneously and simultaneously in a mutually connected way are developed by various Internet companies.

Best wishes

Dear Darshan Kalola,

The core of pulse oximetry devices is nowadays the software that distills the SpO2 percentage from the raw data. Manufacturers create their own proprietary algorithms for their devices. By providing the raw data of all PPG channels plus the result of such proprietary software, reverse engineering becomes a risk. Hence, usually medical grade pulse oximeters will generally only provide a "polished" PPG pulse wave output (if any).

The best way to get access to raw PPGs is buying an evaluation kit from manufacturers that make off-the-shelf integrated circuits for pulse oximetry.

There are several of these:

Analog Devices, APM Korea, Maxim, Texas Instruments, and others.

Research institute Imec (my employer) also makes integrated circuits for SpO2, but for projects that push the technologic frontier of wearable monitoring, where we combine ECG, Bio-impedance spectroscopy, SpO2 and other physiological parameters all on a single chip (4.8×4.8mm) which also contains memory, a processor and wireless connection and runs for days on a single coin battery (Museic3 chip).

But, as said, for simple purposes best buy an off-the-shelf chip evaluation board.

Best regards,

Fokko Wieringa, Principal Scientist Imec Connected Health Solutions.

For me I am kind of tied between the practice of the scientific community and the need to retain the data for subsequent use. Should I release the data in an open repository, ideas I intend publishing as an article might be done by another person before I am ready for writing and release of same.

Multiple testing adjusting is not specific for any test (one-sample t or whatever), it is to control the family-wise type-I error rate (FWER) in a "family of tests".

With "type-I error" is meant to reject the null (H0) under the premise that the null is true. With "type-I error rate" is meant the rejection probability of the null under the premise that the null is true. If this probabiliy is termed α, then means

Pr("reject H0" | H0) = α

Tests are designed to ensure that

Pr(p < α | H0) < α

So it is simple to control any desired "single-test" type-I error rate by rejecting H0 only when p < α. Given a true H0, this probability to reject H0 is then not larger than α, and given any deviation from H0, this probability is larger (how much depends on many things; the power function describes this probability depending on the size of the deviation for a given test and sample size). This is what you know, for sure.

Sometimes, not a specific statistical hypothesis is tested but rather a whole "family" of related hypotheses, to identify those hypothesis for which we would reject the null. If the single-test error-rate is controlled to α, errors will accumulate with increasing numbers of tests. Thus, sometimes it might be more appropriate to control

Pr("reject at least one H0 of all the tests" | H0 in all the tests)

which is called the familiy-wise type-I error rate: the probability to reject at least on of the H0 under the premise that all the H0 are true. Note that there is nothing mentioned about "sharing data". The question is only if you want to control the type-I error-rate for "at least one rejection among a series (family) of H0s".

The problem of multiple testing put the finger into the wound of the (lack of) logic of NHST. Reliance on "fixed α-levels" with the generated dichonomy of "significant" and "non-significant" results is common but bad practice. I suggest thinking about estimation instead, putting the data into the context of the experiment (and its limitation), incorporating prior knowledge where available, and thoughtfully discuss the credibility of the results amd the uncertainty in any conclusions.

Not directly related, but worth to be read:

https://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/gg/GG_Mindless_2004.pdf

The whole genetics field is opening up.

There needs to be more education of the public about their rights.

And there needs to be a government panel to assess genetic issues, especially the ethical issues. And this needs to have representation from across society

Regulation and monitoring is lagging behind scientific progress

https://www.google.com/search?q=south+korea+gene+editing&oq=south+korea+gene+editing&aqs=chrome..69i57.12055j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

It is a dangerous state of affairs

Thanks Mahmoud Ahmed for the straight and very rich answer.

Git and markup languages are very nice tools indeed for these purposes, and I am happy for using them already. I will take a look at Docker. :-)

To anyone else who may need this info, I located some useful sources:

Webinars:

Intro to data papers: https://www.gbif.org/event/7j0sFhaug80CIMqs6aWegK/webinar-introduction-to-data-papers

Publishing data & metadata https://toolkit.data.wa.gov.au/hc/en-gb/articles/115009694808-Publishing-a-dataset-and-metadata-standards#metadata-standard

Data/Metadata publication "toolkits:"

1) https://toolkit.data.wa.gov.au/hc/en-gb/articles/115009694808-Publishing-a-dataset-and-metadata-standards

2) https://www.gbif.org/ipt

Not even sharing with you, a colleague that contributed to the database? That seems odd and potentially (hopefully) an isolated case. One idea to avoid this situation in the future is to hold the data in a ''shared space" where all contributers have access to and ownership of the full dataset.

Hi,

As mentioned above there are many protocols as well as many encryption algorithms which could be adopted by these protocols.

IPsec, for example, supports three encryption algorithms: DES, 3DES, AES.

Here you can find a paper about implementing and performance evaluation of IPsec for embedded systems:

Yes

As often the answer is "it depends". Maybe the following discussion (even if it is centered around a different topic) might be helpful. It contains a number of definitions of the term "ontology" https://keet.wordpress.com/2017/01/20/on-that-shared-conceptualization-and-other-definitions-of-an-ontology/. All of them point into the direction that an ontology is just the "terminological part" of knoweldge representation (the T-Box).

There are other opinions around which consider even the assertional information (the instances of the concepts or in your terminology the data) about the represented world as ontology or belonging to an ontology (the A-Box), but often ontologies are just used to describe the terminology to represent parts of the worlds.

This makes sense, since different people/applications can share the same terminology to talk about their data or represent them in some common scheme.

Dear Jason Deegan, Thank you very much for making very important inquiries on the Research Gate portal and inspiring important discussions on particularly important issues.

In my opinion, it is good that there was a discussion in the question of this query.

This is a very interesting and scientifically important topic.

It seems to me that it is good that there was a discussion in the question of this question.

This is a very interesting and scientifically important topic.

Because the topic is very important so I still read the answers, I follow the interesting discussion.

Dear Jason Deegan Thank you very much for asking this very important question.

Question:

What is an academic concept from your field, that you wish was better understood and applied more?

this is a very important issue that requires scientific research.

Dear George.

Awareness of the concept Intellectual property right in Africa, specifically in Nigeria and presently Uganda is gaining momentum in the sence that before now plagiarism testing was overlooked, right now publications have to go through arrays of test to certify its authenticity or originality.

However have full right to your Phd work even after being declared authentic by various examining bodies of the particular school depends on the extant laws of the school, as each university or college have laws establishing them and also laws guiding the publication and publicizing of such research.

However, from my brief experience and based on advice which i have proffered in different occasions, it is expedient that schools hold on to the finished research for some number of years (Published via institutional repositories as a read only document), after which the research is released to its owner,

I have further opined that the researcher also MAY decide to allow the institution have full authority over the work.

These agreements should be in written form.

I can discuss Foucault with you as I employ his ideas quite often in my own works.

Lindsay. A friend of mine is a parasitologist and he might be able to help you. However, he wants to know if the parasite has been identified. If it has been identified, can you tell us what is it? Guillermo

I hope that the References of the manuscript that I posted in the Attachment will be useful to you.

I agree with Gabriel, there must/should be an explicit agreement between the donor and the vendor as to the commercial use of the cell lines, and NIH has detailed guidelines for such issues, and you will need to check out relevant policy publications.

CRISPR Cas9 is part of a new instrumentation providing new strategies to question what could be information in life systems and how this information is processed. Unlike DNA computing, DNA origami platforms and others that aim at finding the fundamental rules that govern information based on a network of chemical reactions, CRISPR Cas9 is able to edit the genome. In other words, with CRISPR Cas9 we are able to process information in a life system without knowing what it is.

This is a usual way to go in research, the key issue with CRISPR Cas9 is that it addresses immediately the Animal and Human identities. It is going fast, we only start to understand what is the complexity at any scale that we are already in situation to modify the whole process at a large scale.

This is a complete new Ethical Question, because it is hard to envision the consequence at any level. Any Human actions contain implicitly the ability to correct and regulate wrong moves, even if the regulation might become expensive. It is not clear we could do a reverse move if needed. Indeed, we never do a reverse move but biased the orientation when we are doing wrong, therefore we need to find ways to keep this biased skill. This is very demanding and requires improving our human being and social organization. The key issue is trust, there are many possibilities to reinforce trust between people and to improve our human relationship capacity.

Thank you. Will have a look at these.

You can get the similar or apropriate answer by searching the keyword in the GOOGLE SCHOLAR page. Usually you will get the first paper similar to your keyword.

From my experience, this way will help you a lot. If you still have a problem, do not hasitate to let me know.

Kind regards, Dr ZOL BAHRI - Universiti Malaysia Perlis, MALAYSIA

BNT-BKT-BT. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/BNT-BKT-BT#view=54f68badd3df3ee77c8b4638 [accessed May 7, 2015].

Dear M Ramachandra Mohan,

Your idea is fascinating but has no chance for realization.

1. Policy makers (generally) are not interested in truth. They are interested only in political or economical terms. Bureaucrats have no ideas, they are not able to think.

2. These ideas are naïve ideas.

3. RG is full with good ideas but if something should be done participants do not make an attempt or an effort. Of course, this is human.

4. Certainly, one can make an attempt!

Leaders needs to be prepared in innovating education through technology – like media and software design, policy, and analysis, administration, research and evaluation, and teaching with new technologies.Wearable computing and technology will play a cognitive role in soceity.We will be co-intelligent with our technical system.

If you want lots of scientists from all over the world to read your articles, you have to publish them in English: people who do not speak your languge will most probably not pay to get your article translated to English or their language. So, the best solution is to learn English and become so good at it that you won't need to pay for translating or editing your texts. Of course, learning takes time but it will really make sense.