Science topics: Political ScienceHuman Rights
Science topic
Human Rights - Science topic
international human rights, humanitarian law
Questions related to Human Rights
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing decision-making in various domains, from healthcare to business, governance, and social interactions. However, ethical values differ across cultures, making it crucial to design AI systems that are both universally fair and adaptable to local ethical principles.
Key Challenges
- Cultural Diversity in Ethics – Different cultures prioritize values differently. For example, Western societies may emphasize individual privacy, whereas collectivist cultures may value community welfare over personal data protection.
- Bias and Fairness – AI systems trained on biased datasets may reinforce cultural stereotypes or unfairly disadvantage certain groups.
- Regulatory Variability – AI regulations vary across countries, requiring adaptive ethical frameworks to ensure compliance while maintaining fairness.
- Moral Dilemmas in AI Decision-Making – AI must navigate morally complex situations, such as healthcare decisions, criminal justice, and social credit systems, where ethical perspectives differ.
Proposed Solutions
- Culturally Aware AI Design – AI should be developed using diverse datasets and tested across multiple cultural contexts to reduce bias.
- Ethical AI Governance Frameworks – Establishing global and local AI ethics committees that ensure AI aligns with human rights and cultural values.
- Explainability and Transparency – AI decision-making processes should be interpretable, allowing users from different cultures to understand and trust AI-driven outcomes.
- Human-AI Collaboration – Instead of replacing human decision-making, AI should assist humans by incorporating ethical guidelines that are flexible and adaptable to cultural differences.
- Adaptive AI Models – AI should be designed to adjust ethical decision-making based on contextual and regional cultural norms while ensuring fundamental human rights are not compromised.
Conclusion
For AI to be truly ethical, it must be designed with cultural sensitivity, fairness, and adaptability. A combination of global AI governance, diverse training data, and transparency in AI decision-making will be key to ensuring AI aligns with human ethical values across different cultures.
What is the scale of human rights violations, including discrimination, violence and restrictions on freedom of expression, as a serious problem worldwide?
There is strong evidence that human rights violations such as discrimination, violence, torture and restrictions on freedom of expression are a global problem that affects people all over the world, regardless of their origin, gender or beliefs. These violations have a devastating impact on the lives of individuals and entire communities, leading to suffering, exclusion and a sense of powerlessness. The causes of these violations are complex, often stemming from intolerance, prejudice, abuse of power, armed conflict, poverty and social inequality. An effective solution to this problem requires a comprehensive approach, including the enforcement of international law, monitoring of the situation in countries where violations occur, support for non-governmental organisations working for human rights, and education and raising public awareness. Research plays an important role in solving this problem, helping to understand the causes and consequences of violations and to develop effective strategies to prevent and combat them.
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please reply,
I invite everyone to the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
I invite you to scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Yes, the law can sometimes stand in the way of achieving justice, in several cases, including:
(1)
Rigid legal texts: When laws are old or outdated, they may not be compatible with societal developments or new circumstances, leading to unfair results.
(2)
Little interpretation of the law: Some may adhere to the literal interpretation of legal texts without taking into account the spirit of the law or the intent of its enactment, leading to unfair rulings.
(3)
Unfair legislation: In some systems, laws may be enacted that serve the interests of a certain group or protect the ruling authorities at the expense of justice and equality.
(4)
Imperfect implementation: Even if the law is fair in its texts, its misapplication due to corruption or favoritism may lead to unfair results.
(5)
The conflict between law and moral justice: Laws may sometimes conflict with moral principles or human values, making their application unfair in some cases.
Conclusion: Therefore, achieving justice does not depend only on the existence of laws, but on how they are formulated, applied and interpreted in a way that serves equality and human rights.
Taking a serious path in the 1960s, postmodernism is considered the main rival of liberalism after the collapse of communism. Unlike liberalism, postmodernism, which considers knowledge to be relative and the result of social-political dialogue, has been said to have actually died in the 1990s. On the contrary, there is an opinion that it mutated into a postcolonial and feminist concept. Do you agree?
The main approach to regulating AI systems in Europe is the so-called human-centric approach. Assuming that one aspect of this approach is the compliance of the AI system life cycle with human rights - how do you understand: 1) the term "life cycle of AI"; 2) the regulation of particular AI system life cycles to be in accordance with human rights?
I am attaching a link to an overview article on human rights in the context of AI (here on ResearchGate).
"Human Rights as a Factor in the AI Alignment"
I also want to explore this topic and looking for relevant sources
Have you ever read this article normal democratic outcomes and extreme democratic outcomes?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2017. Majority Rule Based True Democracy Under Complacency Theory: Pointing Out The Structure of Normal and of Extreme Democratic Outcomes Analytically and Graphically, Boletin CEBEM-REDESMA, Año 10, No. 8, October, La Paz, Bolivia.
- Human Rights and the Use of Private Military and Security Companies
Analizar el papel fundamental que desempeñan los Relatores y Expertos Independientes de las Naciones Unidas en la promoción y protección de los derechos humanos, creo es es esencial. Estos actores internacionales, parte del sistema de procedimientos especiales de la ONU, la cual han sido esenciales en la denuncia de violaciones de derechos humanos, la recomendación de reformas legislativas y la sensibilización sobre problemáticas específicas. Sin embargo, pese a su contribución, también enfrentan importantes limitaciones y desafíos operativos y estructurales, de ahí mi pregunta.
highlight the complex interplay between human rights and culture with specific reference to gender-related cultural practices which have the potential to violate the human rights of people
Muñoz, Lucio, 2005. " Private and Public Sector Interfaces: Prerequisites for Sustainable Development", In: Sustainable Development Policy & Administration, Chapter 26, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fl, USA.
In times of war, laws are silent.
This is a common saying in the legal field. Yet, for now, the notion of ecocide is only mentioned in the Rome Statute of the ICC in case of conflicts.
How does that make sense when current conflicts tend to demonstrate that international laws are ignored? Even human rights.
Is pushing for the extension and adoption of this notion during peace time even realistic when the context is showing a cruel lack of considerations for basic human rights?
Please let me know what you think
“Affirmation of Harm Avoidance, Reciprocity, Gender, Sex, and Transgenderism: Conventional wisdom is that positive affirmations are highly important as one's thinking often affects that same person's actions. The more left one goes on the political spectrum the more that individual emphasizes harm avoidance and reciprocity over purity, authority, and in-group loyalty as far as moral roots. Gender is definitely a social construct. A man can become a transgender woman simply by identifying as much. Likewise, a gender can change based only on self identity. Transgenderism (the state of being transgender) is when gender does NOT match stereotypical sex. Since gender is completely a social construct, surgeries to reassign sex are costly and completely unnecessary”( ).
Good morning! What is your position on the political measures that are being taken in Austria with regard to the enforcement and implementation of human rights? Thank you very much in advance! :-)
Lukas M.
In recent years, I have been completely absent from scientific social networks and even from the world of research in general. Health problems, then a permanent commitment to environmental activism and human rights have kept me away from it (and I don't know if it was a good idea in the end, I still lost the use of one eye. I'm back for two reasons: - To publish a last paper in my field of expertise. - To specify that, if the Dolos List has closed, I have kept its databases (in particular those distributed to universities). If a collaborative project emerges to replace it, it will be enough to update them and continue the work. This will not be done on my personal site, but I imagine that suitable platforms must exist.
I thank you for your messages and I am sorry for the concern that my absence may have generated for those who were aware of my health problems. But I am better, rest assured.
With friendship,
Alexandre.
Please send me updates regarding the above-mentioned areas in the question mark?
One of the most important issues in the AI field is the alignment of AI goals with human goals.The analysis made in my paper showed that human rights may be considered a guide in European regulations related to AI. Both the AI Act and the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are examples of third-generation human rights regulation acts. This means that the human-centric approach adopted in the context of activities within the AI lifecycle is not just a slogan. However, some studies have indicated that regulations may slow down the development of AI in Europe. There is also a question regarding the relationship between European regulations and those of other regions of the world. In particular, the provisions of the Convention clearly show the aspiration that human rights will be a factor in the alignment of goals between AI and humans worldwide.
Do you think that it is worth considering Human Rights as a guide in the process of the Alignment of AI goals with Human goals?
Is it moral, socially and environmentally ethical for large dominant power companies generating energy mainly from burning coal and lignite to turn off other RES-based energy sources, is it consistent with climate policy and is it consistent with human rights?
In a situation of rising energy prices and the need to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, is it moral, social and environmental to shut down the large dominant power companies that generate energy mainly from burning coal and lignite other sources of energy, including mainly the cheapest and emission-free generation of electricity, shutting down power plants based on photovoltaic panels, not accepting periodic increases in energy production generated from the sun and wind, so as not to reduce energy production from dirty, high-emission energy based on burning coal is moral, socially and environmentally ethical, is in line with climate policy and is in line with human rights?
I ask because such an irrational situation exists in the country where I operate. In my opinion, in a situation of rising energy prices and the need to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, the shutdown of power plants based on photovoltaic panels by the large dominant power companies that produce energy mainly from the combustion of coal and lignite other sources of energy, including mainly the cheapest and emission-free production of electricity, not adopting a periodic increase in energy production generated from the sun and wind, so as not to reduce energy production from dirty, high-emission coal-burning power plants is not moral, socially and environmentally ethical, not in line with sound climate policy and not in line with human rights. The key problem with climate, environmental and energy policy is that it is not conducted fairly. Instead, it is conducted haphazardly, shortsightedly, unstrategically and is politicized in the negative sense of the word. Despite the fact that most of the mining sector, coal and lignite mines, companies in the energy sector and the country's largest fuel and energy company, which holds more than 90 percent of the domestic market share in the sale of motor fuels, are state-owned companies and could carry out in an efficient, comprehensive and strategic manner the process of green energy transition, they unfortunately do not do so. There are many indications that climate, environmental and energy policies are being conducted haphazardly and short-sightedly. The full synergy and correlation that should occur between these policies is missing. Unfortunately, economic aspects are also not key, as they are mixed with political aspects, in which the economic calculus is not treated as a principled factor, and this is in addition to the high level of indebtedness of the state's public finance system and the growing level of the budget deficit in the central state budget. The government has pledged to implement the green transformation of the economy in accordance with the European Union's Green Deal plan. The country receives subsidies from the European Union for the implementation of this plan, including subsidies from the National Reconstruction Plan, which should be allocated mainly to efficiently carried out green investments to carry out the green transformation of the energy industry and achieve the goal of building a sustainable, emission-free energy industry in the shortest possible time. However, this is not happening. Onshore wind power development is still administratively and normatively largely restricted. On sunny, cloudless days and when the wind is blowing, additional energy is generated from already installed photovoltaic panels and wind farms, which is not collected from prosumers by large power companies due to unsuitable transmission networks. Besides, the dominant power companies in the market do not collect clean energy from the mentioned RES sources in order not to reduce the production of energy generated by the conventional method of burning coal and lignite. In addition, the dominant energy companies are lobbying in the political sphere to restrict the development of RES and are causing restrictions on the process of issuing permits for citizens to make further connections to the power grid of prosumer wind turbines and/or photovoltaic installations built by citizens. In addition, there is another extension of the start of construction and implementation of the project to build the first nuclear power plant in a country where the energy industry still relies 3/4 on conventional energy production, i.e. on the basis of burning fossils, much of which is imported, there are situations of energy shortages and eggs to buy from abroad, and the quality of air due to the dominance of combustion energy in the heating season is among the worst in Europe. On the basis of my research, I conclude that this activity is immoral, socially and environmentally unethical, does not comply with climate policy and is not compatible with human rights. Confirmation of the aforementioned thesis is provided by the results of the research I described in my publications given below.
In the following article, I have included the results of the research conducted on the connection of the issue of sustainable development, the genesis and meaning of the Sustainable Development Goals, the essence of sustainable development in the context of social, normative, economic, environmental, climate, and human rights aspects, etc. The research also addressed the issue of key determinants of human existential security as an element of the concept of sustainable development.
HUMAN SECURITY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
I am conducting research on this issue. I have included the conclusions of my research in the following article:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY
The key issues of the problematic sources of Poland's exceptionally deep energy cross in 2022 are described in my co-authored article below:
POLAND'S 2022 ENERGY CRISIS AS A RESULT OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE AND YEARS OF NEGLECT TO CARRY OUT A GREEN TRANSFORMATION OF THE ENERGY SECTOR
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
In a situation of rising energy prices and the need to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, does the shutdown of other sources of energy by the large dominant power companies that produce energy mainly from the combustion of coal and lignite, including mainly the cheapest and emission-free production of electricity, shutting down power plants based on photovoltaic panels, not accepting periodic increases in energy production generated from the sun and wind, so as not to reduce energy production from dirty, high-emission power generation based on burning coal is moral, socially and environmentally ethical, is in line with climate policy and is it compatible with human rights?
Is it moral, socially and environmentally ethical for large dominant power companies that generate energy mainly from burning coal and lignite to shut down other RES-based energy sources, is it consistent with climate policy and is it consistent with human rights?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text, I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

1. Role of NHRC in India.
2. UDHR
3. Constitutional rights
Autocratic systems offer swift decision-making and short-term stability but often at the cost of human rights and accountability. Democratic systems emphasize inclusivity, accountability, and protection of civil liberties, fostering long-term stability and sustainable development, which are crucial for the diverse and dynamic needs of developing nations. Considering all this, which model suits the best for developing nations and what are the factors that make democracy a better choice?
I am happy to share the following opportunity to those who may be interested:-
Application invited for 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐅𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 with 𝟒 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬' 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 at 𝐄𝐮𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬.
Embark on a transformative journey with our 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐅𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩-𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦! Join the program to enhance research and academic writing skills through our esteemed online internship and earn a prestigious certificate.
𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬:
- 𝐃𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 4 weeks of online learning followed by 4 weeks’ online internship.
- 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Upon completion, you will be recognized as a 𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐅𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰:, receiving the prestigious 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐅𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 (𝐂𝐉𝐑𝐅) from the 𝐄𝐮𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬.
𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬:
· Learn the art of policy research and academic paper writing
· Open to candidates from all nationalities and academic backgrounds
· Certification Fee of Only Euro€195
· Ideal for students, recent graduates, and working professionals seeking to advance their career.
𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲:
-Candidates from all academic disciplines
-Enrolled or graduated( Bachelors/Masters/Doctoral program)
-Working professionals in various fields (lawyers, doctors, journalists, social activists, government officials, etc.)
Individuals with a strong desire to acquire policy research paper writing skills.
𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬:
Application Deadline: 𝟏𝟎𝐭𝐡 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒
Program Start Date: 𝟏𝟒𝐭𝐡 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒
𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲:
-Interested candidates can apply by sending the CV to eu.research@eiprhr.org (when sending CV, you can provide reference that you saw the post here.)
-If shortlisted, you will receive invitation to enroll in the program. 𝐋𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞.
𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐣𝐮𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐄𝐑-𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦. 𝐒𝐞𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡.
For any query, you can write directly to responsible organization at eu.research@eiprhr.org
There was widespread social discontent/protest in the UK in 2016 after Brexit/2016 and in the USA after Trump/2016 after their exism movements won the democratic contest under effective targeted chaos.
The same has happened in other countries where liberal democracies under majority rule have produced an extreme democratic outcome since 2016, the latest case is ARGENTINEXISM/2023.
And this raises the question: Murphy's law remorse and widespread social protest/discontent after exism movements/extreme democratic outcomes come in to power: Are they linked?.
What do you think?
If you think that they are linked why do you think so?
If you think they are not linked why do you think so?
Note:
Key concepts: Murphy's law, Murphy's law remorse, effective targeted chaos, exism movements, extreme democratic outcomes, social discontent after the fact
I may be the world's leading expert on parapsychology:
Maybe I deserve an honorary PhD in parapsychology. I would then teach afterlife studies @ UC Davis.
Despite the huge world ,many obstacles are facing human ,how can we assure safety and human right with double face judgments in Ukranion war and Gaza ?
Who agrees identity politics are more permissible for the more marginalized to increase human rights? How?
Nazism is definitely NOT in my interests because they(Nazis) wanted kill very liberal, mentally off, LGBTQAA+, nonconforming, people that look like them but have very subtle not Northwestern European Ancestry. And I believe in hyper life extension so they would especially hate me.
How technological progress affects human rights and how a balance can be achieved between progress and individual rights؟
Are individual rights COMPLETELY dismissible under the notion they are not absolute? How My answer: No because human rights are linked to diversity, equity and inclusion as described in the following essays:
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
Code Popper-Freud Theorem
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
LGBTQAA+ rights:
LGBTQAA+ rights:
Theology:
Theology:
Theology:
Politics:
Politics:
Research Proposal PhD by Published Work Research Proposal- Harmony Between the...
Between the constitutional guarantees for the protection of human rights?
Who agrees platitudes from the intellectually disabled should receive more tolerance? How? Why?
In your opinion, should the issue of ensuring climate and environmental security for people become part of basic human rights? Should adherence to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the urgent implementation of the green transformation of the economy also be recognized internationally, globally, as the basis for ensuring the conditions of existence for the life of future generations on planet Earth, ensuring the possibility of saving the biosphere, the biodiversity of natural ecosystems and the climate for future generations of people, for reducing the scale of the occurrence of global climate and environmental catastrophe in the near future? Therefore, for all of the aforementioned issues, should they be upgraded and recognized as one of the key factors in ensuring the survival of humanity on the planet and, therefore, recognize that they are important determinants of basic human rights? Recognize the right to clean air, to clean water, to an undestroyed biosphere, to a forest undegraded by predatory management, to an unsterilized soil, etc. as basic human rights, i.e. rights that will ensure human security for future generations of people?
With reference to the article published titled: "HUMAN SECURITY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW" of research results on the issue of climate and environmental security, the accelerating process of global warming generated by civilization's greenhouse gas emissions, the increasing scale of the negative effects of the climate crisis, the decreasing scale of human security, the increasing importance and scale of the implementation of the goals of sustainable development and the need to accelerate and increase the efficiency of carrying out the green transformation of the economy, I propose a discussion on the above topic. The research shows that one of the important factors in the increase in the importance and scale of the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the need to accelerate and increase the efficiency of carrying out the green transformation of the economy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, slowing down the process of the planet's greenhouse effect, slowing down the process of global warming, which continues to progress faster and faster, reducing the scale of droughts, forest fires, water shortages, declining production of agricultural crops and other negative effects of progressive and human-induced climate change is to recognize human security as an important factor in the context of legislation and to recognize the issue of ensuring climate and environmental security as an important element of basic human rights. In view of the above, the issue of ensuring climate and environmental security should become part of basic human rights. Adherence to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the urgent implementation of the green transformation of the economy should also be recognized internationally, globally as the basis for ensuring the conditions of existence for the life of future generations on planet Earth, ensuring the possibility of saving the biosphere, the biodiversity of natural ecosystems and the climate for future generations of people, for reducing the scale of the occurrence of global climate and environmental catastrophe in the near future. Therefore, for the aforementioned all issues should be upgraded and recognized as one of the key factors in ensuring the survival of humanity on the planet and, therefore, recognize that these are important determinants of basic human rights. Recognize the right to clean air, to clean water, to an undestroyed biosphere, to a forest undegraded by predatory management, to an unsterilized soil, etc. as basic human rights, i.e. rights that will ensure human security for future generations of people.
These considerations are inspired by the research results contained in my article entitled: "HUMAN SECURITY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW"
I invite you to familiarize yourself with the problems of this article. Please respond whether you agree with the above theses? I invite you to discuss and cooperate scientifically in this problematics.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
In your opinion, should the issue of ensuring climate and environmental security become part of basic human rights? Should adherence to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the urgent implementation of the green transformation of the economy also be recognized internationally, globally as the basis for ensuring the conditions of existence for the life of future generations on planet Earth, ensuring the possibility of saving the biosphere, the biodiversity of natural ecosystems and the climate for future generations of people, for reducing the scale of the occurrence of global climate and environmental catastrophe in the near future? Therefore, for all of the aforementioned issues, should they be upgraded and recognized as one of the key factors in ensuring the survival of humanity on the planet and, therefore, recognize that they are important determinants of basic human rights? Recognize the right to clean air, to clean water, to an undestroyed biosphere, to a forest undegraded by predatory management, to unsterilized soil, etc. as basic human rights, i.e. rights that will ensure human security for future generations of people?
Should ensuring climate and environmental security for people become part of basic human rights?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on a fair approach to the discussion of scientific issues, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Research needs on businesses that uphold human rights standard
Should the protection of the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems as a key factor in humanity's security be included in basic human rights?
In connection with Human Rights Day 2023 (10.12.2023), I propose to discuss the issue of protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems as a key factor for humanity's security in the context of basic human rights as well. If mankind does not manage to smoothly carry out the green transformation of the economy during the current decade, including the green transformation of the energy sector, the amount of greenhouse gases that will enter the atmosphere will exceed the tipping point, so that the increasingly rapid process of global warming will become irreversible. The green transformation of the economy also includes, among other things. such green projects as afforestation of wasteland and post-industrially degraded areas, forest deforestation processes are reduced, agriculture carried out according to the robbery model of economy is being transformed towards sustainable pro-environmental pro-climate ecological agriculture of mainly vegetable crops, urban agglomerations are being developed according to the concept of green smart city, sustainable construction based on green energy-saving low- or zero-emission construction technologies is being developed, production processes are carried out in accordance with the principles of sustainable development and circular economy, consumerism reduction and sharing economy programs are developed, within the transport sector, transport based on electromobility and hydrogen power is developed, within the energy sector, renewable and emission-free energy sources are being developed, including new developments in solar power, wind power, geothermal power, in addition to eco-innovative solutions based on hydrogen power and, in transition periods, nuclear power and low-carbon power based on biogas plants, etc. If the process of global warming is not stopped then the future, including the existence on the planet of future generations of people is at risk. The key issue is to stop the increase in the average temperature level of the planet's atmosphere at max. 1.5 degrees C counting from the beginning of the first industrial, technological revolution. A number of scientific studies show that human efforts to date in carrying out the green transformation of the economy are still insufficient. The high level of relevance of this topic is also pointed out at the annual UN COP Climate Conferences. The 28th UN Climate Change Conference (COP28) is being held in Dubai (United Arab Emirates) from November 30 to December 12, 2023. Studies of long-term climate change processes show that 2023 was the warmest year in 125,000 years. As a result, the question is increasingly topical: Why is humanity under-implementing the process of green transformation of the economy? Do people care too little about the future state of the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems? Is the future of future generations of people still not being taken seriously? Why are the pledges made by governments and corporations at the UN COP Climate Summits to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy still not being implemented on the right scale or only marginally implemented? Why, in the sphere of business and politics, does the question of the future of the planet and humanity continue to give way to current, short-sighted, selfish, subjective and cynically pursued business goals? In this regard, it becomes necessary to recognize the issue of protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems as a key factor in the security of humanity, and should therefore be included in basic human rights.
I have taken up this issue as part of my research and presented the results from my research on this topic in the following article available on this Research Gate portal:
I invite scientific cooperation in the present problematic.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Should the protection of the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems as a key factor in the security of humanity be included in basic human rights?
Should the protection of the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems be included in basic human rights?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz

Dear all
Who would be interested to write an opinion or perspective article on human rights specifically women in Gaza and the genocide unfolding
Social evonomic rights in the gorm of workless wage is accepted in EU and refugees are entitled.
However, the satisfaction of this right ad part of rights to sustained living equality or economic equality due to hostility in adopted country causes other inequalities duch as work contract inequality: some work and get reimbursed some get without work.
Isn"t this inequality a serious one given that the right to life costs state benefits is a non fundamental human right ?
How will we protect human rights in an alien invasion?
How will we protect human rights in an extraterrestrial invasion?
I am wondering if anyone has studied the relationship between human rights impact assessments and/or free, prior and informed consent processes and company-community conflict. In other words, has anyone studied whether there are significantly less conflicts in jurisdictions with stronger impact assessment and engagement (e.g FPIC)? Thank you.
The incorporation of the United States polluted freedom, liberty and justice, prostituted citizens as economic slaves and rewarded human rights abusers such as the King and Queen of England.
The current dismantling of the global cabal is long overdue and there is no place on Earth that should allow "The Crown" to exist, let alone secretive societies that operate in black ops.
More death and destruction has taken place by military industrial complex with complete human rights abuses than from any other means.
Until the military indutrial complex is demolished, global slavery is commonplace.
I want to understand if there is any research telling the accuracy of AI tools when investigating human rights violations and war crimes
human rights and social development
Do you agree with the thesis thate we are witnessing the birth of a new kind of environmentalism/ecologism? Its purpose is not so much to protect the natural environment as to protect people who suffer the consequences of environmental damage and climate change.
An important problem that advocates of this concept is the dramatic ecological cost of social inequality.
Research into the impact of inequality on the deterioration of the quality of the natural environment began in the 1990s. They clearly showed that not only climate change and activities causing environmental degradation have their beneficiaries and victims.
They also showed that the natural environment also suffers from the growing inequality between the rich and the poor. For example, it has been proven that the rate of disappearance of species is more strongly associated with income inequalities than with factors such as population density or environmental policy.
Is it therefore legitimate to bind the responsibility of international organizations, states and economic entities for climate change and environmental damage with their responsibility regarding human rights violations, including those of economic, social and cultural nature?
I know that it will probably be considered an abstraction at this stage, but I am still curious about your views on the possible binding of these issues to the provisions of the third part of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of December 16, 1966, especially art. 11, art. 12 and art. 15.
All good in New 2019!
Please help me to understand veracity of claims regarding legal positivism and logical positivism
Is it possible that disciplines share epistemological approaches despite having a different domain?
There are 2 main similarities in this comparison
1) principle of precedence. In aglosaxon law it means nee judge decisions must mirror past. Pierce from science and Smolin hold a similar view "things like atomshsve tendencybto to act like past and things have more probabilities to act like past than not". Smolin formulatedprinci0le of precence that allows small novelty only
2) deduction from first principles.
Despite Newtonian and 17th century experimental its, large body of physics operates from principles. Principle of relativity, momentum conservation, constancy of light, tgermal equilibrium, energy conversation
Law has its own deduction from human rights principles such as freedom of expression, movement, freedom to life and conventions
So both disciplines share epistemological approaches despite having a different domain
One potential step that can be taken at a global level to address human rights violations is the establishment of international tribunals, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), which can investigate and prosecute individuals responsible for these violations. Another approach is the use of economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure to compel governments to improve their human rights records. Civil society organizations can also play a critical role in documenting and exposing human rights abuses, as well as advocating for change at the national and international levels. It's important to note, however, that addressing human rights violations requires a multifaceted approach that takes into account the specific political, social, and cultural contexts of each country, as well as the underlying structural factors that contribute to these violations.
what is public health, how dies it link to human rights
The protection of civil liberties and human rights is increasingly important in our ever-changing and interconnected world. A government's duty is to protect the rights of all its citizens and to ensure that, regardless of race, gender, or any other marginalized group, everyone is able to access the same opportunities and protection of their rights. It has become increasingly clear that governments must take active steps to ensure that civil liberties and human rights are respected and protected, as any violation of these rights can have significant implications for a society's overall well-being and safety.
In her essay, Paula Sabloff asserts that:
First and foremost, a democratic government protects people’s human rights as laid out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Among these are the right to life, to freedom from degrading punishment or enslavement, and to follow one’s own beliefs. They also include the right to citizenship and, most relevant to dignity, the right to self-determination.
If you were asked to complete the sentence: A democratic government must ...
What would you come up with? What would be your answer or list of minimum requirements?
This is subject of my thesis"human rights and right to development according to responsibility of world bank and IMF",I m lookig for teachers or supervisors and advices that in this field help me ,thank you for your attentions.
Abstract of the book:
The book is an original work presenting an ethical philosophy based on equal human rights. The author argues that only people with equal rights can make social knowledge objective. Considering that people have never had equal rights, social sciences have not discovered the essential point of their existence. Social scientists need to embrace social teaching based on equal human rights. Such knowledge would uncover the values necessary for a good life. Establishing equal human rights will bring radical reforms to the political economy, which can build a prosperous society.
Authorities have always suppressed equal human rights, so people cannot live in a prosperous society. Society has interrupted the equal right to work by allowing the existence of unemployment. Unemployed people must accept poorly paid jobs to feed themselves. It causes the exploitation of workers. Equal human rights are supposed to bring justice to the economy by shortening work hours until unemployment is removed. It will raise the demand for workers and their salaries in the free market until exploitation is eliminated. Then workers will have greater purchasing power, and the economy will grow. Such a policy would solve today's socioeconomic problems and build good capitalism.
Equal human rights are supposed to improve the economy significantly. One day, every worker will be able to work at every public work post they want at any time. Every public job post will be filled by a worker who offers higher productivity, more responsibility, and demands a lower price for current work. It is nothing but a developed work market open at all times. Such an economy cannot be realized soon, but once people establish it, private companies will lose the productivity battle with public companies, which will send capitalism down in history. This idea presents an enormous opportunity for socioeconomic improvement to build good socialism.
Finally, equal human rights mean that all people should have equal legislative, judicial, and executive powers. Everyone should get equal rights to evaluate others for whatever they do. Each positive evaluation should bring a small award to the assessed person, and each negative assessment should result in a minor punishment. Such a policy would make everyone work hard to please others and avoid hurting anybody. This has to create a good society. The equal evaluating power among people presents a new form of democracy, and the freedom of evaluation gives a new state of anarchy. Therefore, such a policy can be called democratic anarchy. Democratic anarchy alone should be capable of building a prosperous society.
Ultimately, the book argues that nothing more than equal human rights is needed to create a good society, and nothing less can make it. Once people accept equal human rights, they will unconditionally create a bright future for humankind, as presented in the book.
The book is presented here:
Digital slavery, in the form of a central bank digital currency that is programmable, is nothing but master-servant relationship that violates all human rights and is only used to control humanity in ways much worse and more destructive than the slavey by the Egyptians, Europeans, and Chinese, in addition to the Southern Americans pre-1900.
There's no excuse to allow a central bank digital currency , and in fact, the central banking system is more corrupt than any mafia on earth.
Prove me wrong.
To explore and discuss Islam's view on human rights and its origin, where must I start from?
How do you think COVID-19 countermeasures taken by states and governments comply with the human rights guarantees established by national Constatutions and the International Human Rights Treaties? Among those measures are :
-mandatory vaccination
-lockdown
-mandatory usage of masks
Dear friends!
I hope you are doing well. I recently wrote an article dealing with democracy in Russia. What do you think? Will there be democracy in Russia, what factors are in play? Article can be found here below:
Best wishes Henrik
Do the human rights rules in the constitutional have the same force and obligation to compare it with other rules. Can you divide the constitutional rule?
What are the obligations of states with regard to human rights in the face of increasing climate change?
in light of the digital opportunities capabilities and challenges, how do we guarantee the human right to his private life and the right to respect digital activity
State secret is a constitutional limitation reason for freedom of expression in Turkey. So I am looking for the laws or procedural legal principles which are balancing state secrets and human rights. I am searching laws about state secret privilege or state secrecy procedures.
Can anyone help me to formulate my research question for a thesis paper? I would like to do a research regarding the influence of sustainable development agenda 2030 on migration flows and human rights. Yet I also want to include in my research the fact, that not only safe and regular migration can help to achieve sustainable development, but the agenda 2030 can also have a positive impact on regular migration and human rights security (may be with a reference to gender issues or climate refugees).
I will be grateful of you could help me out!
Thank you!
Human rights and torture in regards to ontology and epistemology
This article talks about the human rights abuses by MNOCs in Nigeria Niger delta. It carefully and critically analyse the Mechanisms used by the MNOC during litigations and their level of engagement with their human rights obligations. Also there are suggested recommendations to address these Mechanism.
- Does normative legal philosophy also have a potential critical function vis-à-vis existing, empirically provable injustice where the injustice is not so much promoted or brought about by discriminatory laws, incorrect court rulings or actions contrary to human rights in the sense of an ideology, but rather by legislative and political laissez-faire or even omission (cf. e.g. mediterranean migrant crisis, anthropogenic climate change or pandemics)? From my point of view, this should be the case (but where is it explicitly stated and conceptually discussed?).
- Which concepts from the field of normative legal philosophy/ legal ethics could be used to transparently and rationally criticise such state and supranational omissions from a normative perspective? Should new concepts of legal ethics be developed, can existing concepts be adapted? Who are the primary addressees? From my point of view, the minimum connection between law, serving as the basis of state action, and justice, which can be assessed against Radbruch's formula, enables a normative evaluation of state and supranational omissions, but also provides the contours for corresponding (political) duties to act.
What is your opinion regarding these issues?
Some legal philosophical approaches to these questions can be found in my paper "Extreme Wrong Committed by National and Supranational Inactivity: Analyzing the Mediterranean Migrant Crisis and Climate Change from a Legal Philosophical Perspective", Göttingen 2021.
I want to start a research about cultural rights and the environment. It is related to my last work "Preventing and pursuing the destruction of Shiite holy sites according to the case of Bamiyan's Buddhas". I consider the aspects of the relation between cultural rights, eg. cultural sites, and the environment. How can we promote our protection of cultural sites against damage? What are the damages that threat cultural sites? Is there any action that the states should fulfil? What about native people? ...
it is said that the more we go toward maintaining security in our society, the less human rights can be realized. In the times of emergency, governments often suspend some of their Human Rights obligations in order to better respond to the crisis. Even there are derogation clauses in every Human Rights instrument. But how are we to treat this conflict? Should we give priority to one side or should we try the balancing approach? if the balancing approach is to be chosen, then how exactly are we going to balance two incommensurable values, Security and Human Rights?
[Courtesy: Medscape]
This is a systemic failure on many levels- who all are culpable?
Is this practice continuing, on a more subtle basis?
Who supervises the supervisors?
Should non-medical people oversee the administration of Ethics Boards?
Refugee crisis was a reality worldwide just a while before the COVID-19 pandemic. What are the current and upcoming effects of the pandemic in refugee crisis and human rights?
In recent past there is growing recognition of the links between human rights and the environment. A human rights based approach to environmental protection includes the interpretation of environmental protection in the context of human rights. Using existing human rights mechanisms to tackle environmental harms will be helpful as human rights mechanism is well established in comparison to mechanism for environmental protection. Such approach also seeks to reinforce the capacities of duty bearers to respect, protect and guarantee of environmental human rights.
In looking at trauma can one define trauma as a human right issue? Is it okay to ascribe trauma as a situation which is been experienced by only the poor/low-income earners?
Responding to the Corona virus has the potential to affect human rights of millions of people. Censorship, discrimination, arbitrary detention and human rights violations must have no place in the fight against epidemics, Corona virus is no exception. Human rights violations instead of facilitating the fight against undermine the effectiveness of public health measures .
Nursing is a profession which deals with many aspects of people's lives. Nurses are often faced with ethical problems and experience many conflicts between their professional oath. The influence of conscience on nurses has frequently been described but its impact on their practice has received less attention. During their daily practice, they need to quickly decide on one of the several competing options. Conscience i directs individuals towards non-maleficence and veracity and helps people understand their duties for coping with life as a valuable component of nursing practice which demands sensitivity, respect for human rights, and attentive and dignified care delivery. How to increase work conscience in nursing?
Would like show me university that will conduct research about
Language, linguistic, ethnic of culture, women emancipation, human-right,& education research ? I need information about that , thanks
Often times there is a disconnect between theory and practice in the lives of peoples, including this paradox through which it can be understood that there are inherent human rights and have been approved by international charters and treaties, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states in one of its articles the right to education, in exchange for the lived reality The use of this inherent right is far from being used, especially in light of brutal capitalism, whose main motive is profit.
📷
The concept of human rights, which has been developing for a very long time, and experienced its boom after the Second World War, has brought a lot of good to the world. However, we must ask ourselves whether human rights are increasingly becoming an instrument for achieving political goals, even when it means a violation of international law, and even the human rights themselves, especially due to the alleged protection of such rights of others. In particular, we can observe that calls for human rights are increasingly a means of imposing minority attitudes to the detriment of the majority, that the need to protect human rights is used to justify armed interventions in other countries; unlawful arrest, detention and, torture of terrorism suspects, etc. Where does all this lead?
The Tigris - Euphrates water conflict is frozen conflict between three riparians (Iraq, Syria and Turkey). The conflict came up because of upstream water projects by Turkey and therefore the restriction of water access to individuals of downstream failed states (Iraq and Syria). There are two principles are conflicting: Territorial sovereignty of Turkey and human right to water of individuals (This is issue of global justice and not international justice due to failed states). My question is: whom belongs water and how property (connected with territory) theory of Locke can be connected to the sovereignty principle of Turkey?
Thank you beforehand
During the COVID-19 pandemic, human rights violations including censorship, discrimination, arbitrary detention and xenophobia were reported from different parts of the world.
]n the case of software or virtual networks that are provided internationally and are almost exclusive and are usually supported by major world powers, it is necessary to accept a number of commitments before using them. These commitments are often intellectually and logically unconscionable, and although they do not appear to be fundamentally contrary to fundamental rights and in the context of international human rights declarations, charters and conventions, they are clearly contrary to the basic principles of human rights and human rights. The information contained in these networks is often misused based on the user's initial license. This is while we know that the public interest always takes precedence over the personal interest and this issue has been raised in different ways in different legal provisions?
In Brazil at a seminar sponsored by the special committee of the Chamber of Deputies, the consensus was that the hardening of punishments applied to juvenile offenders would not be the solution to reduce the practice of criminal acts of the same.
Women owned businesses are highly increasing in the economies of almost all countries. The hidden entrepreneurial potentials of women have gradually been changing with the growing sensitivity to the role and economic status in the society, In Africa we cannot be that much positive while we still fighting for human rights and gender equality, thus the governors and society actors interact with these phenomena by launching a series of solutions to accompany women in the process of being an economic actor in societies.
Decolonial theory tends to avoid the language of human rights due to a concern about who is included in "the human" of human rights. But many struggles today start from the language of human rights, meaning that not engaging that language could be a missed opportunity for practice. I have started to theorize decolonial and human rights movements together, and I would be interested in learning from other perspectives on this question.
In a country where the regime is very repressive, journalists will be afraid to write news. What is your opinion?
Targeted chaos and misinformation are at the heart of extreme democratic outcomes as they are the active ingredients needed for them to come to exist, to persist, and to propagate. One example of extreme democratic outcome is USEXIT or Trumpism.
Targeted chaos and misinformation are mostly based on fake facts or an alternative facts, which raises the question “Are extreme democratic outcomes when in conflict and the rule of law in liberal democracies incompatible?
I think yes, what do you think? Why do you think so?
It promotes tolerance and understanding above and beyond our political, cultural and religious differences, putting special emphasis on the defence of human rights, the protection of ethnic minorities and the most vulnerable groups, and the conservation of the environment.
Under normal liberal democracy there is war between several views on how to advance the common good either at the expense of the minority(e.g. traditional liberal democratic parties) or at the least cost possible to the minority(e.g. traditional liberal conservative parties). ...War here simply means " a usually heated conflict between competing ideas....".
In normal liberal democracies, science plays a central role, and if science is not followed or it is partially followed or it is ignored completely and things go bad, the opposition party will use that rational in the next election and the incumbent party may spin the reality, but the buck stops there…and the people decide at election day….
Hence, liberal normal democracies of all sorts are incompatible with authoritarianism.
When we have an extreme liberal democracy such as USEXIT or Trumpism, the whole thing changes….extreme liberal democratic outcomes should be expected to align better with authoritarianism than with normal democratic thinkers,,,
I can see several reasons why that is the case, which leads to the question, Which are the central links between extreme liberal democracy and authoritarianism/dictatorships?. Can you see them? Or What do you think?
Please express your views on the question.
Over the last several decades, the increasing global attention to issues of human rights for
lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people and other sexual minorities has focused on the intrinsic value of those rights from a social, cultural, and ethical perspective. Recognizing those rights represents a commitment to equality for a stigmatized group of people and to guaranteeing universal freedoms for those individuals. Enacting those rights to achieve equality means working to end discrimination and violence against LGBT people. The need for attention is clear: human rights agencies and scholars from around the world have documented violations of human rights, finding discrimination, family rejection, violence, imprisonment, and other forms of exclusion faced by LGBT people in every country studied.
This question is asked in the context of International Migration and Human Rights of Migrants
The Human Rights of Regular(Legal) and Irregular(illegal) Migrants
Thank you in advance
Whereas the spread of coronavirus outbreak [Sars-CoV-2, December 2019-2020][1], developing into a global pandemic situation, the governments everywhere have declared a 'state of emergency' to stop the spread of the pandemic as much as possible. What are the human/legal rights that you have faced as being violated under this pretext by State? I mentioned also the 'legal' rights as if there are local constitutional lawful rights that are also violated by police enforcement or so.
How can this interference of the Public authorities with your right be regarded, justified, or on the contrary, denied and fought against?
[1] Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus strain that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory illness. Gorbalenya, A.E., Baker, S.C., Baric, R.S. et al. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 5, 536–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
The coronavirus is increasingly having an impact in public and private law. Fundamental freedoms are restricted. Fulfillment of contracts becomes impossible; many obligors and debtors refer to force majeure (vis maior).
I am looking for practice of international monitoring mechanisms as well as international organisations (e.g. OECD) and States' practice
Time witness several foul, hatred and inhuman cases between the different creeds and communities and also recorded many domestic violence inside the family during this pandemic lockdown.
I'm writing a book that raises questions about the traditional meanings of justice and injustice.
How do we even remove the notion that animals are lesser beings than humans?
Human Rights are a critically important concept and set of principles for social justice, however, as hegemonic device, they act as barrier to the pursuit of Decoloniality
Democracy plays pivotal role to ensure the welfare and development of people. It protects basic human rights and liberties. However, democracy needs to be improve as time travels. Therefore, how democracy shall improve or what are the steps to improve democracy? Following are some of the steps we shall adopt to improve democracy. What are the other measures to enhance democracy?
1. By Increasing the role of political parties
2. By increasing Role of Opposition Party
3. By increasing political awareness of people
4. By increasing people centric policies of the govt.
5. By increasing role of civil society
6. By increasing decentralisation of power
7. By improving political participation of people
8. By increasing role of media
9. By increasing literacy
Child participants in research have a measure of vulnerability that requires strict ethical measures to handle it. In the wake of human rights and awareness of various laws, will research on minors become more complex?