Questions related to Hate
I am currently looking to do a four-way loglinear power analysis. I have used G*Power in the past for other power analyses, but there is no option for loglinear analyses.
I have read a little that R might have to do this for me.
My design is currently a 2x2x2x2
2 (hate condition: Hate, No Hate) x 2 (hate type: Homophobia, Racism) x 2 (victim gender: Male. female) design x 2 (verdict: guilty, not guilty)
Does anyone have any idea of how to conduct this using R or elsewhere?
Are there investors on the forum?
The theory of the Genesis of earthquakes has been created.
Based on this theory, the main fields, the main forces involved in the development of earthquakes, are determined.
The participation of the same fields in the creation of anomalies and in the creation of the earthquake itself ensures 100% reliability. The low speed of the wave that creates an earthquake ensures high accuracy in determining the location, start and end time, and the strength of a future earthquake.
This makes it possible to save people's lives.
This makes it possible to receive high income by reducing the losses of countries in earthquakes.
This gives sustainable growth through the development of the Global Earthquake Prediction Network.
I did everything I could. No one will ever exceed the number of positive opinions I have received.
It's not because I'm a "genius".
This is because there is no point in creating a collection of positive conclusions. I had to do this because I worked alone.
The institutions of Israel hated me because I am a "Russian Jew" who dared to create a patent.
The Academy of Russia hates me because the Expert Council of the RAS itself recognized my results and recommended starting implementation.
And now what? Everything you need has been created.
People will die in hundreds of thousands because no one wants to implement?
Do you want to do something important and useful?
I'm 76 and oncology. Who wants to become a leader and get the knowledge that I have accumulated in 20 years?
In my opinion, academic conferences (ACs) are (very) necessary in the tertiary institutions of higher learning, as it creates a platform for knowledge sharing and exchange. Scholars from all walks of life dare to attend because, they believe they will gain useful "something." Sadly, these conferences run for only two or three (maximum) days: a duration some scholars and institutions may find unnecessary to spend a lot of money for.
If the impact of AC is to network for further collaboration, look for external examiners for your faculty/department/students, peer review of pedagogical practices for the sake of standardisation, then 2/3 days are just not good enough.
Therefore, I think/suggest that:
- AC should have minimum of 5/7 days, whereby, experts in their various fields can be invited to come and share their experiences and how they made it, new trends and current research areas that can advance our lives.
- Experts in analytical software that are more appropriate for the chosen field to come and empower scholars in that discipline (I hate giving my work to someone to analyse for him to tell me the outcome). When you analyse yourself, you gain more insights that can lead to multiply knowledge creation.
- The suggested duration can help to achieve the listed impacts in the second paragraph.
Who can afford not to attend a conference of such benefits? and who will dare to say that such a conference is of little benefit?
I invite comments!
Los discursos de odio en internet la mayoría de veces pasan desapercibido. Al final son igual de ofensivos que en otros ámbitos. Con esta pregunta me gustaría saber vuestro pensamiento sobre las consecuencias que deberían tener y el daño que hace a las personas excluidas.
My lab is looking to purchase a cell counter for tissue culture and I was hoping you guys might have recommendations for ones that you loved (or hated)? At a minimum we’d need one capable of counting Trypan blue cells, but ones with fluorescence capabilities might also have use for us.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions you might have!!
The average American has always had a love-hate relationship with the IRS-with hate predominating. The so-called Exit tax kicks in the moment you think of expatriating from the U.S. The current maximum capital gains rate is 23.8%, which includes the 20% capital gains tax and the 3.8% net investment income tax. Why its unfair? Currently, federal income tax brackets range from 10% to 37%. Nearly half of the American population pays taxes and in fact, the top 50% account for nearly the entire federal income tax. So the question of levying an exit tax on Americans relinquishing their citizenship really means I am going to get what I can from you before you make a break for it. In other words, the IRS ensures that the relinquishing citizen would never feel grateful for giving and doing his bit for the great country. The current threshold is so less ($12,550 and $28,500.) that almost everyone who holds a reasonable job pays his federal taxes by filing an income tax return each year. Then consider that inflation in the millennium year was around 3.3% whereas today it's over 8%, so where has real income disappeared? Then when someone decides to head west (after paying all his legal dues of a lifetime), IRS slaps him or her with the Exit Tax. Hence the question.
A question about models of recall and recognition based upon personal experience:
I have had the experience of not being able to recall a specific words (I hate growing older ;) ), but still can pull up enough context to do a search for the word. But here has been my experience--before I begin to scan the results of the search I suddenly am able to recall the word; it is almost as if the mere act of beginning the scan there is some level of 'pre-activation' that enables me to recall, but it feels as a gray area between recall and recognition. Now, I have not been active in cognitive psychology for a while, but my quick research review has not provided insight. So for those cognitive psychologists out there, including developmental psychologists, as it seems to be there are developmental processes that must be at play here, is there a body of specific to these processes? Perhaps it is just me and not a more global process at all?
Dear Respondent, I am inviting you to participate in research conducted for academic purposes to investigate the relationship between animosity and consumer perceptions. Included with this letter, there is a short scenario. After reading the scenario, please answer the questions. The results of this pretest will be used for a Ph.D. dissertation, so the cumulative responses of the sample are important for the results rather than individual ones. Therefore, there is no need to give your name. There is no risk for you in participating and you can be assured that your responses will be confidential. The survey should take you about 15-20 minutes to complete. Participation is entirely voluntary. Thank you very much in advance. Survey Link: https://forms.gle/kytRVFgfF21Huja4A
Sincerely. Muhammad Taqi Ph.D. Candidate Department of Business Administration Izmir University of Economics
I have a single-cell clones from a CRISPR cell line that have become contaminated. I would like to not have to re-generate the line and instead recover what we have. They are cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% Pen/Strep. I have also added Normocin as well, but still have some contamination issues leading to poor cell health. I think I may have identified the source of the contamination, butI hate to loose the 6 months of time it took to get these cells. I also recognize that I might need to start over, but was hoping that there might be some tricks of the trade out there that we could try first.
I am inviting you to participate in research conducted for academic purposes to investigate the relationship between animosity and consumer perceptions. Included with this letter, there is a short scenario. After reading the scenario, please answer the questions. The results of this pretest will be used for a PhD dissertation, so the cumulative responses of the sample are important for the results rather than individual ones. Therefore, there is no need to give your name. There is no risk for you in participating and you can be assured that your responses will be confidential. The survey should take you about 5 minutes to complete. Participation is entirely voluntary. Thank you very much in advance.
Link for the Survey: https://forms.gle/Ym5uq3RxeGb9iNR98
Muhammad Taqi - PhD candidate
Department of Business Administration
Izmir University of Economics
Does Journal Impact Factor Really Matter? Whether you like it or hate it you can't ignore impact factor (IF). Is it a measure of how important a journal is within it field.
IF is basically a measure of the average number of citations to an article published in the journal.
In this question I'd like to know the following - if possible- :
1) what makes the management refuse to hire new employees, knowing that its not a problem of labor costs
2) if a person agree, subjectively, that he/she works extra hours due to work commitment, without getting paid, if it is good or not .
3) when and where is it the key role of manager/trainer to turn the morale of employees, knowing that the work is stressful to both management and employees
4) how the pandemic have shaped the new work on the employees & what are the long term effect of it on the employees?
Hello, I am currently working on finding antecedents of brand hate. I have put forth a construct that leads to brand hate. So, the antecedent which leads to brand hate has three different dimensions (Political, Economic, and Military). And brand hate is made up of three different emotions (Anger, Disgust, and Contempt).
Independent Variables (Antecedent)
- Treatment 1: Political
- Treatment 2: Economic
- Treatment 3: Military
- Treatment 4: Control
Dependent variable (Brand Hate)
We are going to develop three different essays (scenario) that will represent each of the independent variables. And there will be a survey that will be filled by the participants after reading the scenario. Three different treatments will be given to different groups.
I would like to know the following:
Type of Experimental design?
Hypotheses type: Directional or Nondirectional?
Data collection: Random, Nonrandom? (the study will distribute the survey online)
And that whether if there is a need for a control group or not.
Thank you in advance, if there is any information which you believe is missing please message me and I would provide it. It would be very helpful if someone with experience in experimental research could message and guide me through this.
The question is chaotic yet very relevant. Why would a country hate its own government?. A good example to note from the elections of May 2020 where countries in Europe send their representatives to EU. A number of far right parties and others who didn't believe in the EU principles got a large share of votes. Countries like Greece, Moldova and Bulgaria have among the least government popularity percent's. There are others too, outside of EU-Saudi Arabia for one, Pakistan , Israel, Jamaica, and even PRC (though they haver no elections). Its important that the governments woke up to the fact that people ultimately determine the direction of the governments-and its people who will ultimately decide how can government stay in power-with or without the use of force.
If I increased the number of keywords (Features) of examples in training set pertaining to a particular class regarding to Sentiment Analysis Classification , will increase the efficiency of the classifier?, such as take the word "Happy" or "Hate" and all their Synonyms, so that it can independently classify the new sentences for any class belonging? To be noted, I deal with a large data set.
Many thanks in advance to your answers
I think that Indifference in encounter transgressive brand is epitome of evil. It can be claimed that hatred of the brand is less dangerous than indifference.
In the words of Elie Wiesel(1986), "The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference".
Culture of Consumption of consumers in your country, which one does she prefer?
The reason for starting this discussion is a very arrogant, abusive, hateful (and of course anonymous) review that we received for our manuscript, submitted in Arachnology https://bioone.org/journals/arachnology lately. Almost all of the reviewer’s comments started with phrases like: very boring; useless; non-essential; a fairy tale as for example “Alice in Wonderland”; limited experience in spider taxonomy; very limited knowledge about spider taxonomy by the authors, or even “preoccupied with nationalism” ??? Apart from us, the reviewer abuses also some other authors that we cited in our manuscript.
The point here is not about positive or negative review, but for the ethics in peer reviewing and the language of the reviewer. And my question is should the editors accept such nonsense as a valid review and send it to the authors at all? In many high impact Journals like https://plos.org/resource/ethics-for-peer-reviewers/ , there are reviewer’s guidelines and respectful and professional language is explicitly required. Although such guidelines are missing in Arachnology, or at least I couldn’t find them, I still think that such hateful remarks should not be accepted by the editor. It’s interesting to hear the colleagues’ opinions about this.
I am doing my first thesis, and a bit confused about the theoretical framework, would you please help me to find one?
My thesis is concerned with cyberhate against viral women on social media. where the main question will be what sort of hate comments people usually post and how it became normal in the cyberworld.
Please, any help will be appreciated. read almost 15 articles, still confused
It is not acceptable to repeat mistakes committed in the dark ages even in 21st century. Isn’t it a failure of the system, if such mistakes were committed with impunity? Many great researchers such as Giordano Bruno and Galileo were hated, humiliated, prosecuted, imprisoned or even killed, when they tried to expose flawed 2300-year-old basic presumption (the earth is at the center) in the very foundation of then dominant paradigm (known as geocentric paradigm).
The pre-paradigmatic foundation for the dominant paradigm existed in 16th century was created more than 1800 years ago, which comprised of unproven basic 2300-year-old presumption such as “the Earth is static at the center”. It is a basic presumption, since large chunks of know lodge, observations or evidence in the mankind’s BoK (Body of Knowledge) until 16th century had been acquired and accumulated by relying on the unproven flawed presumption.
Is it acceptable to hate, denounce or persecute anyone for tiring to expose such unproven flawed presumptions in the pre-paradigmatic foundation of any exiting dominant paradigm for any scientific or technological discipline that is playing vital role and widely used in 21st century? Is it acceptable, the research community acts or behaves no differently that the researchers, who tried every thing in their power to suppress and sabotage the efforts of anyone trying to expose such flawed unproven basic presumptions in the pre-paradigmatic foundation of the dominant paradigm?
Any scientific or technological discipline end up being a fake or pseudo science, if its pre-paradigmatic foundation comprises of flawed presumptions, since it is impossible to create real hard science by relying on flawed presumptions. Any scientific discipline end up being a paradox, if the BoK for the discipline has been acquired and accumulated by relying on flawed presumptions.
The pre-paradigmatic foundation for software and computer science created more than 50 years ago comprising of unproven flawed presumptions and large chunks of knowledge, observations and evidence for existing dominant paradigm for software engineering has been acquired and accumulated by relying on the flawed presumptions in the pre-paradigmatic foundation.
No technological problem can ever be solved by relying on flawed or invalid knowledge relevant to the problem. Hence, certain large problems in software stood unsolved for decades. Isn’t pathetic, if the research community can’t understand this simple logic that it is impossible to acquire relevant valid knowledge by relying of flawed basic presumptions?
Many software researchers argue computer science is not a science. I agree, since it is impossible to acquire and accumulate valid scientific knowledge by relying on flawed presumptions. Even the basic science end up as a paradox (i.e. geocentric paradox) in 16th century, since it is rooted in flawed presumption. The basic science was transformed by exposing the flawed presumption in its pre-paradigmatic foundation.
Aztecism holds when a society bets its existence on a commonly held belief which entails this society’s own annihilation – as the old Aztecs did.
This statement belongs into the field of the professional historians. However, it in addition also possesses an uncanny actuality to date. For all of us – the whole world – have ever since 1929 learned to live with the scientific conviction that there once existed a Big Bang and that the universe is still young and expanding to date. All high school kids and all newspaper readers across the world share in this belief which got reinforced by some ten Nobel medals over the decades. To place doubt in their conviction automatically raises pitiful eyebrows.
This self-righteous common belief is, of course, based on a majority consensus maintained for 90 years. It could in principle still turn out to be mistaken, but such a case has never occurred in modern history before.
“Do you really place doubt in a planet-wide scientific consensus acquired by the best minds and the most prestigious societies over 9 decades?” is the question. “If so, something is bound to be ticking wrongly with you. Presumably, the Moon landings are also put in question by you,” so every pupil is ready to laugh out loud.
The notion of Aztecism stands for an irrational conviction held by a whole society. So much more for the worse if I now confess to the reader that I do adhere to the outrageous conviction of Zwickyism.
May I elaborate? I begin by admitting that I am the first author on quite a few unchallenged scientific publications which claim to prove that maverick astronomer Fritz Zwicky was right in 1929 with his ridiculed so-called “tired light theory” of the cosmos. The whole world is chuckling because it appears highly unlikely that we all live in an Aztec society for 90 years – or do we?
The kids who follow me can stop reading here. What I will continue to say next is only of interest to adults who have experience with how to deal with ingrained ideologists. In other words: this is a case for the psychologist?
Unless it deserves to be shreddered, the present text presents a very disturbing message. We all have heard the story of the ghost driver who complains about the flood of ghost drivers encountered by him. On the other hand, this is also the secret dream of every scientist: to for once come into a situation in which you determine the direction of further scientific progress. Provided, of course, that you are not deluded. Therefore the above scenario is a very rare event to reckon with in reality – much too rare for it to occur in a lifetime, right?
But the unlikely does sometimes apply. The famous science of Thermodynamics from more than a century ago does not stand alone anymore for a few years, for example. It has acquired a sister science which had been overlooked for more than a century, called Cryodynamics. Cryós in Greek means cold, thermós means hot. A side effect of the existence of the new science is that there was no Big Bang, as this was first seen by Zwicky in 1929.
“But if you lean yourself as far out of the window as you just did,” so you will reply, “then further implications of a sensational character are bound to be announced by you in a minute?” Yes Sir, do I respond meekly, there is especially one point: “No CERN safety for earth anymore.” The for 11 ½ years non-renewed official planetary safety report LSAG of CERN’s comes to everyone’s mind here as a historical fact.
After my having just made this accusation, you will understand why I have for a decade become an outlaw in the scientific community, one who is unworthy even of the benefit of the doubt. Imagine: to claim that ten thousand living scientists (at CERN) are deluded in sync along with 9 decades of mainstream science – this is an absolutely ridiculous claim of mine, is it not? And to proclaim in addition that this new view puts the continued existence of earth at risk if it is not addressed, is bound to be a case of irresponsible fear mongering. Although this is exactly what a today unknown crackpot once tried to convince his fellow Aztecs of.
I sympathize with your unavoidable logical skepticism: Cryodynamics clearly is “too big a jump” to be easily absorbed by the community. I would nonetheless be very glad if there were a few high school students on earth ready to give me the benefit of the doubt, Greta Thunberg included. So far, the very existence of her movement points to the existence of a subconscious connection between my a decade old results and the heroic Friday movement of today.
You have now seen my worried soul, my dear adult reader. Please, do not hate me too much for my driving my lonely scientific car in an allegedly non-ghostly direction. And forgive me if I love your children more than I see you do in case I am not mistaken.
Otto E. Rossler, a chaos researcher
November 29, 2019
Hi all I’m conducting research on the relationship between social media and election violence. Particularly can a popular hateful page on social media that is spewing hateful tweets or posts cause it’s followers to enact real life violence on a target group?
for ex did Donald trumps anti Jewish tweets cause lead to more Jews being victimized etc.
any Insights would be beneficial as I draft up a research proposal
Global problems were supposed to make every human being feel part of one family concerned about the future of our planet. I think the opposite is happening as we have more divisions, more hate and more selfishness.
Any suggestion that could help human beings feel closer to each other?
During electrophoresis, I observed a lagging read band on my gel. I have done many Westerns and have never encountered this before. I spoke with my PI and some others and they haven't observed it either. The only difference between this run and what I have done in the past, is the use of a 4x LDS Sample Buffer from a manufacture that we do not typically use. I contacted the manufacturer and was told that this is most likely from an issue with their product.
Has anyone encountered this before? If so, how did it alter your transfer and quantification?
This will not be used for publication. However, I would like to know if it would be possible to continue on so I can get some preliminary data. I hate the idea of wasting so much tissue as I had prepped lysates for several gels.
I am suspending a pre-labeled lyophilized Amyloid-beta[1-42] in DPBS -Ca/-Mg. I have this now in 37degree incubator to aggregate.
The protocol I am following has further pelleting and rinse steps following the 48hr aggregation/incubation. The protocol is designed for 5ml tubes and says to pellet at 14,000rpm.
I do not know what rotor they used to do this, so I do not know the actual force. I hate it when people put rpm in a protocol and don't say what rotor.
Does anybody have an idea at what force I should do these spins? The reagent is pretty expensive and I am already late on this. I do not want to spin way too hard or way to easily.
Religions were made for betterment of human race. It is expected that there should be ample advice to respect people, even all the people of all other religions.
The reverse is seen. Followers of one segment of a religion even hate the followers of other section of same religion!
It is practically very rare to see respect among the followers of one religion for other religions.
Then what is the use of religions in the society if it only devide people?
I was threaten by a French guy (not on this site) who kindly advise me not to play with fire, revelations from 16th C books could harm a lot of people. And Algerians were not ready to read their own history in Topography and General History of Algiers. So I'd rather spent my time educating them.
It's just too much for me, this kind of philosophy still prospering nowadays in 2018. As a matter of a fact, it's the French government's position regarding francophones: educate Africa. Vulgar and pretentious.
We all know how good French did the job. The book i'm translating, Topography and General History of Algiers, was translated in 1870. They forget the introduction, the publication license, the marginalias and took away a lot of details, transforming it in a "non-sense History". After that, they forced Algerian to remember how chaotic and illogical was their story at mandatory school, provoking hate, despair and discouragement among Algerians towards their own History. Now, 50 years after the Liberation, little by little, they are recovering and History is turning a passion in the country.
Do you think knowledge can be harmful?
Most of us speak fluently 3 or more languages. But do you realize in which language you're thinking? In which language do you talk to yourself? Personally, English is a great way to clarify and expose things; I also principally swear in English (because Spaniards don't understand it). Spanish is to me the only philosophical language, with two verbs for to be, but also the feelings language, the language that best fits to unpredictable things, the only language that evokes properly magic. French can be reduced to what makes it a "diplomatic language": the fabulous litote. When, in a French classical play, Chimene says don Joan: "Go, i don't hate you", all the French understand: "I'm crazy in love with you". How to signify the more saying the less. Apart from diplomacy, not very satisfying... So, in which language do you think?
I need to know about Shakespeare's opinion about women because I am interested in feminism and I want to know on which side Shakespeare was ?
We are told that when it is hard to make a stable contact on a thin film while performing a IV-characteristic measurement, for example, sandwiching a small, flat sheet of indium between the thin film and the metal contact tip helps. However, I don't think I have a good physical explanation as to why it helps.
And, more importantly, I remember one of my PIs hated using indium, and instructed me to avoid it as much as possible. Is there any situation where it is not advisable to use indium? All I know is that the indium is put in series with the sample, and since the resistance is less than 1 ohm, the effect is negligible.
Thank you in advance!
Though this can be perceived to be philosophical in retrospect, it is a valid behavioral question.
I contend that hate is more dominant. In observational research, not sanctioned, just in the world of social media, it seems that even the most benign of posts, say a yellow kitten, can become fodder for hateful attacks against others.
Is it that we live in the world of anonymous responses, or is it that hate is truly the more dominant emotion?
I am considering my dissertation topic, and believe Love versus Hate in social media would be a worthy topic for research.
I guess that anyone faces at least unjustified hate from a hater in his/her life. IMHO, haters are weak, and psychologically ill people. Probably, the best way to deal with these personalities is to avoid them; however, in some cases avoiding them is impossible. Therefore, I am asking about the best scientific approach to deal with them provided that the violence option is excluded.
Pope John XX111 postulated the thesis, "PACEM IN TERRIS". Simply put, "If you want peace. sow justice". My question is is the church living up to its roles and obligations today?". People like late Rev. Fr.Chukwulozie tried during their lifetime to promote inter - religious dialogue especially Muslim - Christian dialogue. I admonish the church to look into matters of gross violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms that are brought before her. Muslims and Christians are a family. Christians should not judge muslims as people who kill for Allah to make heaven. I was disappointed internally when one of my lecturers last year incited the class against muslims by teaching us that muslims kill in order to make heaven for Allah. I will never forgive him for wrong and hateful teaching. Lets reason together now to make peace reign in Jesus name. Amen.
A writer had an open invitation to construct counternarratives based on her summary of groups who attended the "Battles of Berkeley"
What I am asking is a similar call for researchers to provide counternarrative extrapolations from these bullet points.
Pick one, or several, or all OR critique this method for its ability to effectively construct counternarratives. If you do critique, however, please provide more fruitful alternatives :)
MAIN MESSAGING FROM RALLIES (so you can make good counter messaging)
- Anti-immigration/supports deportation & ICE
- For Muslim ban
- Anti-abortion and planned parenthood
- Anti-government social safety nets like healthcare & snap
- Mostly Christian
- Passionately hate Obama and Hillary Clinton (still talks about them)
- Love president Donald Trump no matter what he does
- Propaganda pushers of false media
- Blue Lives Matter
- Obsessively against Communism
- Pro-Western Culture, believe everyone should assimilate to their ideal state
- Pro Confederate monument preservation
- Fine with people of color (they really hate being called racist)
- Anti-Black Lives Matter
- Extremely Patriotic
- In favor of traditional Male/Female roles (Patriarchy)
- Fine with LGBT but against trans in the military (because Trump said so)
- Pretty much anything Trump says they support, except white supremacy because again, they hate being called racist
- *source link https://www.classic8media.com/news/2017/8/21/battle-for-the-bay-whats-the-real-message
Created in 1972, when data digitization was non-existent, to help librarians choose the most relevant journals for users of scientific collections, impact factor became a competency factor in the 1990s. allowing to evaluate authors quality. Thus, in some countries, researchers are given premiums proportional to the impact factors of the journals in which they publish.
However, recently, some American journals have eliminated any reference to impact factor in their websites. In addition, The "Science" journal cited in its opening pages an article written by eight leading scholarly publishers with the title "Hate journal impact factors? New study gives you one more reason". The "Nature" journal has gone further: with this title: "Beat it, impact factor!".
I need a proper scale for propaganda or rumors to see the impact of propaganda/rumors on hate. It will be highly appreciated
My suggestions are different ideologies must not be allow function on a common idealogical concept as to prevent conflict of ideas