Science topic
Guilt - Science topic
Subjective feeling of having committed an error, offense or sin; unpleasant feeling of self-criticism. These result from acts, impulses, or thoughts contrary to one's personal conscience.
Questions related to Guilt
Men often feel very angry with women who never initiate sex and too often don’t want sex. But this anger has a tone of alienation, guilt, and insecurity: men feel instinctively on some level that sex does not involve an equal sharing, especially when they are having an orgasm and the woman does not – and this puts them on the defensive. (Shere Hite)
For those who stand on the pulpit and preach "follow the data...", there should be no question, Covid was a planned bioweapon attack and was a manufactured weapon.
For the field of "science" to be silent in the face of censorship of research, silencing of scientists, ridicule of narratives that do no conform, all of the field of scientists whovremained silent were complicit in a Hitler style attack, and own the guilt, sin and consequences.
What is clear is that the field of "science" has becomecan extension of oligarchy corruption and has failed at its core.
Science and data prove that and the experiments and research support the claims made in this narrative of consciousness.
Science would not allow such denial of data, and would condemn the manufacturing of bioweapons, the forced injections of DNA altering chemical and metallic inventions, and would join the pursuit of truth , not the royalties of sales from the bioweapon attack.
To all "scientists", shame, shame, shame.
When the world needed you, you were silent and afraid.
Way to go- you would have been promoted by Adolph Hitler.
Men often feel very angry with women who never initiate sex and too often don’t want sex. But this anger has a tone of alienation, guilt, and insecurity: men feel instinctively on some level that sex does not involve an equal sharing, especially when they are having an orgasm and the woman does not – and this puts them on the defensive. (Shere Hite)
I am an undergraduate student conducting an honors thesis on how feelings of guilt and shame impact parental confidence when a child is placed in the NICU after birth. I also want to look into what factors contribute to these feelings of guilt and shame. For example, I think mothers are going to be more worried about how their emotional state is going to impact their care for their newborn but fathers will be be more worried about financial burdens and paying for new medical devices. If anyone has any suggestions for how I should approach this research and how I should measure these variables it would be greatly appreciated. I am very new to research and need some guidance.
I am examining whether sex and religion of a defendant may impact their percieved guilt, risk, possibility of rehabilitation and the harshness of sentencing. I have done this by creating 4 different case studies in which a defendant has differing sex and religion and was suspected of committing a crime. There were 200 participants in which 50 each where given one of the 4 case studies. Participants would then have to answer a number of questions about the case study such as "what sentence do you think is fair?" All data is ordinal. Ive been advised to used different statisical analysis so im confused and would like some advice on which one to use
Hello Research Community
I am currently working on a research paper titled, 'Understanding the Phenomenon of Guilt in Working Professionals Living Away from Family.' I have prepared an interview guide for conducting in-depth interviews. I require expert validation for the same.
It would be really helpful if any expert in qualitative research can provide the same and fill in the following document.
Hello everyone,
I have a little problem regarding interpreting my results of pairwise comparisons (one-way ANOVA) for my masters thesis.
Situations is as follows:
I have the following three variables:
1. perceived social status (PSS, dependent variable)
2. ECO (independent and binary variable: ecological good (ECO_02) vs. non ecological good (ECO_01))
3. KS (collective guilt; moderator variable, also binary: low collective guilt (KS_M = 0) vs high collective guilt (KS_M = 1))
I have the following two hypothesis:
1. The consumption of ecological good increases the PSS of a person more than the consumption of non ecological good.
2. The influence of an ecological good on the PSS is amplified by collective guilt.
I want to test both hypothesis.
With which table (seen in both pictures) is a testing of the hypothesis better? Or is a reformulation of the hypothesis needed?
Thank you very much!
A drop of truthfulness worths more than tons of hypocracy as the for former offers confidence and latter sprouts guilt in the inner self.
Regards.
Find Likert scale items to measure
Guilt or Shame after doing unethical behaviors?
I am currently doing my master's dissertation on the effects of flight shame on the choice of eco-labelled flights in a discrete choice experiment.
However, I am looking for a suitable and validated scales to measure the constructs shame and guilt. I am aware of proneness scales such as the TOSCA-A scale , but am unsure whether or not proneness scales would be suitable for my research as I am trying to figure out if they experience any shame or guilt while selecting their flights during the choice experiment.
Many thanks.
I'm running Mplus-5 for latent class analysis and I would like to save the output of univariate distibution fit by class as a csv file to analyze in R (I'm more used to R). I have tried to use the SAVEDATA: command to try to accomplish that but I failed. This is the last code I tried:
TITLE: LCA
DATA:
File is "C:/Users/wang/Desktop/R/MPLUSDATAonlylogCRP.txt";
VARIABLE: Names are
ID sexo idade LOGCRP fum MDIAB
MHAS MCOR MINF MDERR MOUT MTIR DEPMOOD IRRIT
LOINT WLOSS WGAIN INSOM HYSOM MOTORR MOTORA FATIG
USELESS GUILT IMPTHINK INDEC DEATHOS SUICI SPECPLAN
SUICATT FUNCIMP DRUPHY MOURN
;
missing are all (999);
CLASSE = c(3);
USEVAR are
LOGCRP sexo
DEPMOOD IRRIT
LOINT WLOSS WGAIN INSOM HYSOM MOTORR MOTORA FATIG
USELESS GUILT IMPTHINK INDEC DEATHOS SUICI SPECPLAN
SUICATT FUNCIMP DRUPHY MOURN;
categorical are sexo-MOURN;
IDVARIABLE IS ID;
ANALYSIS: TYPE = MIXTURE;
STITERATIONS = 100;
ALGORITHM=INTEGRATION;
MODEL: %overall%
c ON
LOGCRP;
OUTPUT: TECH1 TECH8 TECH10 TECH11 RESIDUAL STANDARDIZED CINTERVAL;
SAVEDATA: FILE IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\output3class.csv";
FORMAT IS FREE;
RESULTS ARE "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputResults.csv";
ESTIMATES ARE "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputEstimates.csv";
SWMATRIX IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputmatrix.csv";
SAMPLE IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputSAMPLE.csv";
DIFFTEST IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputDIFFTEST.csv";
TECH3 IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputTECH3.csv";
TECH4 IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputTECH4.csv";
BASEHAZARD IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputBASEHAZARD.csv";
RESPONSE IS "C:\Users\wang\Downloads\outputRESPONSE.csv";
SAVE = CPROBABILITIES;
The reason for so many lines in SAVEDATA: is I tried every command I found in the Mplus manual trying to discover if any of them was what I needed.
The 10th World Assembly of RELIGIONS FOR PEACE will take place from August 20-23.
In view of increasing tensions within and between the leading political powers, the answer to this question is particularly important. Today all religion stress their interest in peace.
God created Adam with a particular (pure) "Nature". When Adam ate the forbidden fruit in the Heaven, did it alter the nature in any sense? Since before the event, there was no sin, no guilt, no shame. Did the sin change the nature of human response? I am specially interested in the explanation given in Islamic, Christian and Jewish scriptures.
There are so many diseases are out of our medical school learning scope. They are unreal diseases from people's grief, guilt, against ethics, past life wound, karma, etc.
Could you please share your experience and how did you treat and the result. Thanks.
from article...
"Actions which violate moral norms evoke negative emotional experiences (guilt or aversion), even if there is no victim."
How resolve the missing moral norms problem in science?
Systematic Review GRADE checks for bias don't codify failures in trial quality, such as gross errors. This leaves decisions to include dubious data to subjective opinion. Observational STROBE or RCT CONSORT tools don't accommodate for undisclosed funding, ie where the PI had declared conflicted interest elsewhere than in the article considered.
Australia has no Office of Research Integrity, and Bretag's Handbook of Academic Integrity explains the weaknesses of governance framework in this country. I have a case series of 3 violations of our Motherhood statements eg Helsinki, E72, Belmont Report etc. Each institution's HREC won't correspond, nor will the publishing editors. How can these investigations be recounted, while protecting privacy of individuals whose guilt cannot be assured - for want of a forum to raise allegations?
I want to understand the place of self-worth, sense of responsibility, guilt, and shame, in possibilities of a decision to engage in alternative development-enhancing actions.
Interested in cancer, HIV, trauma, or other populations. All ideas welcome.
In particular I am looking for literature that delves into aspects of guilt, stress, and/or ideal worker concepts.
Currently writing a dissertation on the suitability of the doctrine of joint enterprise for an individual's criminal liability (guilty by association) and was wondering if anyone could provide any literature/authors/information into this controversial area of law.
Hello,I am using the Caregivers guilt questionnaire made by Losada in my dissertation and i have some problem with the scoring.I have to divide guilt in two different levels 2.1. Low and 2,2, High. I am already aware of the range scores in total and in each item, however I would like to ask for your advise regarding the Low and High levels. Is there a score number that indicates the levels of guilt.
Thank you
Hi - was wondering if anyone may be examining the neural substrates of moral emotions particularly shame and guilt. I'm particularly interested in any new research using imaging studies. Many thanks.
I am wanting to measure levels of actual guilt experienced by adults in the context of both parents working full time shortly after the birth of a child.
I am trying to research the phenomenon of society persecuting family members of sex offenders. I am focusing on internet related offenses (child pornography, etc). Generally the spouse, children, and other family members are completely unaware yet become pariah to the general public as though they committed the offense themselves. Fears of guilt by association leads many secondary victims to avoid seeking support services creating long term issues. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Tammy
Some of the most frequently used scales include strange items with questionable face validity.
