Science topic

# Geometry - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Geometry, and find Geometry experts.
Questions related to Geometry
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Einstein's 1905 theory derives a relativistic geometry for spacetime in the absence of matter, and then applies it in the presence of matter, to derive rules for how that matter behaves at high relative velocities.
Einstein does not seem to explain, hypothesise or justify why the behaviour of matter should obey a geometry that presupposes that no matter is present. To turn a two-postulate relativistic theory of empty space into a physical theory (that applies to matter) requires an additional (third) postulate, addressing how the presence and motion of matter does (or doesn't!) affect the shape of the region's ligthbeam geometry.
It seems difficult to come up with a specific "postulate #3" to complete SR's derivation that does not then invalidate the whole theory. This is presumably why Einstein never completed the process.
Is there way way to complete SR's derivation without the necessary third postulate being in disagreement with known principles or evidence? If not, do we need to reassess the case for special relativity?
Eric Baird,
The third postulate,which is not a main or fundamental postulate or assumption,is the conservation of momentum,where the momentum is defined as the product of the relativistic mass and velocity.The clock postulate and the reciprocity postulate, each can also be called a third postulate.What the clock postulate and the reciprocity postulate are is kept to you as homework.According to Einstein et al.,special relativity has only two main or fundamental postulates or assumptions.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Euclidean 3 dimensional geometry is taught in engineering school.
How can there be variation in the models of interpreting 3D?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi, I'm trying to assign different material to this geometry (attached), cortical bone for external part (and internal 'islands') and bone marrow for internal part (no islands), but the section is empty while trying to assign materials. Do anyone know what problem is occuring?
Thanks
Di Wu, I would suggest trying other file formats or other importing settings.. But I always prefer to create my parts using Abaqus.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
My study area is extremely large (multiple valleys) and precipitation is close to zero. Streams are often dry, but runoff almost solely comes from glacier melt and is heterogenous throughout the valleys. I have extracted stream boundaries for hundreds of basins using a machine learning algorithm and I can get channel geometry such as width/depth/cross sectional area (at any point along the stream), wetted perimeter etc. Is there any way I can get approximate velocity, discharge, etc at bankfull using stream geometry and a corresponding DEM? Maybe using slope and geometry?
The Manning's n approach has been around for quite a while and may suit your needs quite well. Having said that, simply bear in mind that the approach assumes that all flow is 1-dimensional. In other words, this numeric model assumes that the water in the channel essentially flows in a straight line. Perhaps you are familiar with the old phase 'all models are wrong, some are useful'. Point being, just remember that the output you get is an approximation. In the off chance you have some measured discharge values in your study area, this can help quite a bit to calibrate the roughness values you end up using.
The HEC-RAS 1-D model relies on the Manning's equation for its calculations. If you crank up the roughness values, this will result in slower velocities and higher water surface elevations. Conversely, if you lower the roughness values, this results in higher velocities and lower depths.
As for the value of Manning's n that you use, I'll admit that these references might not be the most appropriate or useful for you particular application. Having said that, it doesn't mean that you can't learn something from these references either. So yes, they are 'oldies' but they are also 'goodies' and they can help to you start to better understand some appropriate Manning's n values.
Limerinos, 1970. Determinination of the Manning Coefficient From Measured Bed Roughness in Natural Channels
Arcement & Schnieder, 1989. Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains
Verified Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I have tried changing the lattice parameter using this formula: a2 - a1/a1 where a1 and a2 are unstrained and strained lattice parameter after full geometry optimization. Problem is...suppose I have optimized the compound on which I want to apply strain and got lattice parameter 5. Now I want to apply 1% strain on it...So I set the lattice parameter 5.05 and start full cell optimization again. After optimization it's showing lattice parameter..5.001( closer to 5)..It's pretty normal I know. But then How can I apply exactly 1% strain on a certain compound?
Just don’t do a full cell optimization again, do a fixed cell geometry optimization with your desired strain.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I want to define a contact between two bodies. Due to the geometry, both bodies do not touch. The gravity would cause both bodies to touch.
Hello. I'm trying to get it working with this simple model. If it works here, then I can transfer it to my project.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am working on material studio 2020, CASTEP module, when I optimize the geometry, I am getting this message at each job failure
[mpiexec@Rahat-Saqfi] ..\hydra\pm\pmiserv\pmiserv_cb.c (863): connection to proxy 0 at host Rahat-Saqfi failed
[mpiexec@Rahat-Saqfi] ..\hydra\tools\demux\demux_select.c (103): callback returned error status
[mpiexec@Rahat-Saqfi] ..\hydra\pm\pmiserv\pmiserv_pmci.c (520): error waiting for event
[mpiexec@Rahat-Saqfi] ..\hydra\ui\mpich\mpiexec.c (1149): process manager error waiting for completion
How to resolve it?
I don't have much experience with Intel's MPI, unfortunately. It's probably best to contact BIOVIA Support, I'm sure they'll have seen this before. Alternatively, you could ask Intel directly, but they aren't always very good at responding.
In the mean time, you could check the hydra service is actually running, by using:
hydra_service.exe -status
And you can test the Gateway etc using the Licence Administrator tools.
If all else fails, you can get the free academic CASTEP licence and just compile and run CASTEP yourself, with the input files generated by Materials Studio.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
When I am using MOLUSCE, a QGIS plugin, it displays a warning message: the geometry of different rasters does not match. Raster geometry generally means raster cell size, number of rows and columns, and projection. So how can I generate two or multiple rasters that have the exact same geometry? Does anyone have any helpful advice on how I can get past this error message?
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions or feedback.
Just go through the given link below and I hope you will get the solution.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
"There are no empty bands for at least one k point and spin; this may slow the convergence and/or lead to an inaccurate ground state. If this warning persists, you should consider increasing n extra bands and/or reducing smearing width in the param file. Recommend using n extra bands of 8 to 18". In every step of geometry optimisation result for a particular material this notification is shown. How can I solve this problem?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I'm performing a geometry optimization on cyclopentanol and I want to constrain a planar geometry on the five-membered ring. Can anyone explain briefly how this is achieved? Perhaps sharing a sample Gaussian input file would help.
Thanks for the information. My question was a technical one.
I understand the importance of empirical data and this is part of the validation plan in my protocol. But training a forcefield usually requires high-level ab initio data, to begin with. Not to mention that it was shown that forcefields trained on ab initio data still reproduce experimental properties very well.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Dear all,
I have a small query regarding the equivalency of the 2D and 3D cohesive zone models. I have designed a 2D square geometry tied with a cohesive element in the middle in ABAQUS. I am trying the validate my load-displacement response with an equivalent 3D model geometry using a suitable out-of-plane thickness. However, the results are not the same at all. The same can perfectly validate for a model without a cohesive zone. Will anyone please help me to resolve the issue?
The model geometry is attached herewith for a clear understanding.
Dear Pran JYOTI Saikia,
Please recheck your model; you might have done something wrong in modeling. Moreover, you can convert plane strain analysis from 3D to 2D when the third dimension is way greater than the other two dimensions.
Also, you can learn how to do a proper cohesive simulation with this tutorial package: https://caeassistant.com/product/implementation-of-cohesive-by-interaction-element-base-methods-in-abaqus/
You can find some examples at this link. Just use the “cohesive” keyword and search:
Best regards.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi,
I am doing a single-point SA-CASSCF calculation on the azobenzene derivative, and once the calculation is completed I got energies corresponding to S0 and S1 states, however, no structural data corresponding to the S1 is found in the output file. Do I need to specify extra keywords/options to get the geometry of the S1 state?
Here is the route section for the mentioned calcultion,
#p casscf(6,4,nroot=2,stateaverage)/6-31+g(d) nosymm scf=(maxcyc=500) Guess=(read,Alter) pop=full geom=connectivity
Actually, I was looking for state-specific geometries from SA-CASSCF...
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I work usually with idealized geometry, but this time I want to use patient specific geometry of blood arteries. Is there any way to upload/implement such type of geometry to a Matlab code?
Thank you Mr. Daniel Galeazzi for your answer. I will try this out.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am running simulation in damask on the mesh solver example that damask developers provided in dasmask documentation. The problem which i am facing is that how to control the maximum iteration number? because the simulation is running from morning till evening and has reached to 125 iteration and then gives message of cut back and started simulation from start. how to control iteration number?
• Thank you Mertin Diehl for the information regarding mesh solver. Due to convergency problem of the mesh solver I have switched to spectral solver for simulation. Now the problem I am facing is that due to not enough information about damask 3 thermal expansion data i fail every time to make correct yaml.file for thermal expansion analysis. i have attached the file below , can you check the file for correctness? basically the geomtery i make consist of a cube having spherical partical inside it in the centre. now i want to specify 100 C temperature for spherical particle and 0 C for cube. after running the simulation i have to check for thermal stresses which in case of this material yaml file gives me zero which is not correct. thanks in advance
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I'm learning to do a simulation in Gaussian. The objective is to simulate the molecules that I study in my master's degree. For that, I did the geometry optimization along with the frequency calculation to confirm the geometry, then I did the TD-DFT calculation to get the electronic transitions.
The transition results coincide very well with the spectral region of the experimental results. However, molar absorptivity is a few orders of magnitude higher. I would like to know if this is normal or if the calculations may be wrong? if it is normal, is there any reference that discusses this difference?
Hello, Debopam Ghosh. Alright?
I did the optimization and electronic transition calculations under both vacuum and solvent media conditions using PCM.
The difference is a red-shift and a higher molar absorptivity in a solvent medium. The spectral region of the electronic transitions in the solvent medium coincides with the experimental ones. However, it has a greater magnitude.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I need to store molecular geometries in redundant internal coordinates (RICs) and have so far been able to get all of the information I need aside from what the d.o.f.s correspond to. I presume that the "Redundant internal coordinate indices" hold this information but I cannot find information on them anywhere in Gaussian documentation or other forums, etc. It doesn't seem to be a connectivity matrix, but the numbers clearly correspond to each atom and it is not clear to me from analyzing the geometry visually either. I would really like to avoid having to write and validate code from scratch to backtrack this information from cartesian coordinates or pulling connectivity from a different output file format.
I have attached an example of the formchk file output from Gaussian optimization and frequency analysis for a basic case (methanol) but here is the crucial information for easy viewing:
Atomic numbers I N= 6
6 1 1 1 8 1
...
...
Redundant internal dimensions I N= 4
15 5 7 3
Redundant internal coordinate indices I N= 60
1 2 0 0 1 3
0 0 1 4 0 0
1 5 0 0 5 6
0 0 2 1 3 0
2 1 4 0 2 1
5 0 3 1 4 0
3 1 5 0 4 1
5 0 1 5 6 0
2 1 5 6 3 1
5 6 4 1 5 6
Redundant internal coordinates R N= 15
2.06335755E+00 2.07679249E+00 2.07679461E+00 2.73743812E+00 1.83354933E+00
1.90516186E+00 1.90518195E+00 1.84167462E+00 1.91434964E+00 1.94775283E+00
1.94775582E+00 1.96310537E+00 -3.14097002E+00 -1.07379153E+00 1.07501112E+00
Thank you for any and all insight!
While it is not confirmed by Gaussian, and is not in their internal manual either: I have confirmed via test structures and cross checking of different values that this set of integers is indeed a matrix of atom indices in sets of 4, indicating the atoms involved with the degree of freedom, so the example I showed earlier becomes:
(1 2 0 0) bond length between atoms 1 and 2
(1 3 0 0) bond length between atoms 1 and 3
...
(2 1 3 0) bond angle between atoms 2, 1, and 3
(2 1 4 0) bond angle between atoms 2, 1, and 4
...
(4 1 5 6) dihedral angle between atoms 4, 1, 5, and 6
with 0 as null values indicating no atom there.
Hope this helps someone in the future!
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hello everyone,
I have multiple projects, where the only thing that needs to be changed is the geometry (mechanical model) the transient thermal and the static structural will stay the same. However if i want to copy the whole project (all 3) it gives a error: The given data container reference is null. If i want to duplicate them separately then each analysis will create its own tree which means that they are not connected anymore. How can i copy all 3 projects and only modify the geometry?
Help would be much appreciated!
Kind regards Thomas
Hi,
Just go through this video.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I want to specify natural convection boundary condition at the top of the wall. I am trying to reproduce some results. Author didn't specify value of h (heat transfer coefficient). He gave an expression for it. You can see it in attachment. I don't know how to incorporate this equation in my boundary. I am attaching geometry and equation that I want to apply at the top wall. Can anyone please help me in it?
The equation mentioned above is nothing but the energy balance (conduction=convection at that surface), you still need to have the heat transfer coefficient (h) except which all other parameters could be iteratively solved. 'h' need to be an input to the numerical study.
Considering its natural convection, i would expect h to be somewhere between 0-10 W/m2 K. What i would suggest is to use a value of 5 ( convective heat transfer boundary condition at that wall) and compare the results. Trail and error could help you find that h value.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
In ABAQUS, I want to model a bent tube with varying thicknesses and diameter (continuous linear function) from one end to the other. I have attached a sketch with the question for better understanding.
Later I want to hydroform it into an even more complicated shape, therefore meshing, surface definition, and boundary condition definition are important. It is not a challenge for modeling tools like SolidWorks, CATIA or ProE but importing part from there is a mess and even if somehow import is successful, meshing, surface interaction definition, and BC definition is problematic. Therefore, it would be great if I can directly model it in ABAQUS.
I tried 3D/Shell deformable sweep command but it only asks for a sweep geometry at then sweeps the geometry along the defined path continuously, while I want to vary the thickness and diameter linearly.
Is there a possibility to do that?
Possible approach is to use Part>Create:3D-Shell-Sweep to draw longitudinal section of the tube (particularly, two paths for lofting), Shape>Wire>Sketch to draw circular edges, Shape>Solid>Loft to build the solid body without hole, Shape>Cut>Loft to make the hole, Tools>Geometry Edit…:Edge-Remove to remove unused part of longitudinal section.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
For example a square unit cell in xy plane to be tilted in the same plane by 45 degrees
using rotate option we can do it. However one has to take care of axis of rotation.
Select the object and click on rotate present in tool bar, it will prompt for axis selection, X-Y-Z, then enter the angle in number (45 in your case) and see the result after clicking on OK. you can see the figure rotation by changing the axis check box in the 3d object window it self.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi all,
I have worked on CFD simulations/analysis of a diffuser turbocharger compressor geometry for a typical engine passenger car. Also, I have completed optimisation process of the diffuser geometry using Adjoint Method.
In the numerical CFD simulation chapters, I need to justify why a high-fidelity simulations is required for the optimisation process. What are the alternative methods? How my results will be different if used, for example; semi-empirical correlations to estimate the efficiency of the compressor stage?
Any idea, suggestion, comments or recommendations, I would much appreciate.
CFD has been successfully used to design and refine small portions (leading or trailing edges, pitch, length, inlets and exits, guide vanes, etc.) of entire devices of this type (turbines, turbo chargers, compressor sections, expander sections, etc.) but not the entire device, as there are simply too many parts comprising the whole. If you are considering the whole device and how this might perform in a particular application, detailed CFD modeling will not yield all the information that you need. You will also need bench test data. Successful applications have followed this approach: 1) select the best available device for this particular application; 2) perform lots of tests; 3) improve individual aspects of the design to best work within the context of your application; 4) continue to test and refine. I seriously doubt that you can build a detailed numerical model of such a device, place the numerical model inside a commercial package like MatLab, find the optimum design parameters by considering many possible designs, spit out the design to a 3D printer, rip the turbocharger off a Porsche, bolt your device in its place, and expect a 25% increase in power output and corresponding decrease in fuel consumption. It's a nice idea but would only work in the movies. Advancements like this take years of effort and teams to accomplish with lots of failures along the way. Some very smart people have already been working very hard at Porsche to design their turbochargers. These can be improved and we hope to see that happen, but it will not be an easy task and it won't be entirely automated. Don't let this discourage you; rather, persist until success is achieved.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I need to find this distance for complete the modeling of reflection-absorption of light in Si solar cell.
Thank you very much for your comments, solution, and recommendations. I added one more loop into my code that includes the ratio of L1/L2 to check the approximate solution.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Good afternoon,
I am currently simulating a combustion in CFD on ANSYS FLUENT and I am trying to get the best mesh possible out of this geometry. It is a rather simple one, with four inlets that lead to the combustion chamber. My question is, since I am quite new to ANSYS, what is the best way to mesh this geometry? Of course the inlets will have to be more refined than the rest of the mesh but I was asking the best methods to approach this. I am having trouble meshing the inside of the furnace because I am always getting really insconsistent tetrahedral cells.
Thank you very much.
Hello Luis
Please use the structured mesh for the quality mesh and keep the skewness factor at least 0.5. You can use the face meshing tool for structured mesh.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
• I am preparing to submit a manuscript in field of materials science. Is there a new rapid peer-reviewed, open access journal of materials science and geometry?
Thanks. It seems to be multiple topics journal. This is nice, but the indexing journal does not appear in the website.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
How can I import 2D sketches from CATIA into COMSOL Multiphysics?
The formats that COMSOL reads in 2D geometry are not available in CATIA.
You can import your 2D model from CATIA software into AutoCAD software and write output DXF.
Good luck!
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi everyone, is there a way to link Matlab with Abaqus?
Specifically I have done a geometry in Matlab, and then I want to import this geometry in Abaqus for mechanical analysis, but I don't work how it works.
follow
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I would like to simulate a copolymer with 25 units of PE and 25 units of PEG in MS. During this task I was troubled with an convergence issue regarding the mesocite geometry optimization. Hence I need some advice in order to solve this problem for a further DPD calculation.
For this reason I tried to write down all the steps that a have been working on until this issue (pls see the attached MS-file):
1.) Define a copolymere with an ethylene and ethylenglycol repeating unit
2.) Perform a forcite geometry optimization
3.) Define the coarse grain under mesostructure as well as the bead type (see file)
4.) Calculate the repulsions parameter a = 104 + 3.5 X between PE and PEG
(while X represents the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter which I calculated beforehand)
5.) Define a DPD forcefield where you enter the repulsions parameter in a table
(a = 104 for same block interaction like PE/PE and PEG/PEG and a = 195 for different block interaction like PE/PEG)
6.) Define a mesostructure template (120•120•120 A)
7.) Fill the template with the .xcd-files from the copolymers
8.) add the forcefield to the file
9.) run the geometry optimization (COVERGENCE FAILURE)
...
10.) Perform the DPD calculation (intented GOAL)
follow
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I would like to create a porous geometry. I am looking for your suggestions on any open-source software which can help me to create the geometry. It would be idle if I can control or define the porosity of my created geometry.
Dear Ketaki,
OpenFOAM I believe, is useful for creating porous media.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Dear all
While doing geometry optimization using materials studio - Castep for mixture atoms,
I'm receiving an error as follows
"Error geom_precon_exp_get_r_NN: increased r_cut to twice system extent without finding neighbours for all atoms. This can happen if your system is too small; try setting r_cut manually"
how to rectify it?
Victor Milman Thank you for your response i will do it
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I have done an analysis of residual stresses in a composite plate structure in ABAQUS. I need to take a section of the plate (a rectangular patch which represents a tensile sample) and apply tensile loads to it WITH THE RESIDUAL STRESSES from the first model BEING ITS INITIAL STRESS STATE.
I know that it is possible to do this if the geometries are same and I can take the final stress state of the first model as the initial condition for the second model. But since the second geometry is a subset of the first, I am not able to map the results ONLY in that region as the transfer takes place based on node numbering and the node numbers in both the models do not match.
Any info on whether this is possible on ABAQUS would be welcome. Is there any technique that I can use to solve this problem?
you can check *IMPORT keyword of Abaqus. This keyword can import an already solved part (with stress fields and deformations) to a new analysis. You can see the manual for more information of how to set up your model.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Many analytical approaches have been developed over the years , and comprehensive bibliographic studies have been published on the prediction of E2,G12,Poisson's ratio of unidirectional composites. in The Halpin-Tsai equation 𝜉 is an empirical factor, which measures the reinforcement of the fibers of the composite material which depends on the geometry of the fiber, the arrangement of the fibers and the loading conditions. In generally, 𝜉 may vary from zero to infinity. taking 𝜉=2 to calculate E2 and 𝜉=1 to calculate the shear modulus G12
I am looking for the value or the equation to determine 𝜉 to determine the Poisson's ratio v23 ?
Hello Samir
Various formulas have been derived from experiments to calculate the reinforcement factor. see DOI: 10.1177/002199836700100205.
They are all approximate solutions and may require validation of results
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
LIGO and cooperating institutions obviously determine distance r of their hypothetical gravitational wave sources on the basis of a 1/r dependence of related spatial strain, see on page 9 of reference below. Fall-off by 1/r in fact applies in case of gravitational potential Vg = - GM/r of a single source. Shouldn’t any additional effect of a binary system with internal separation s - just for geometrical reasons - additionally reduce by s/r ?
"LIGO and cooperating institutions obviously determine distance r of their hypothetical gravitational wave sources on the basis of a 1/r dependence of related spatial strain, see on page 9 of reference below. Fall-off by 1/r in fact applies in case of gravitational potential Vg = - GM/r of a single source."
No. Fall-off for a single point source goes as 1/r2 for the field strength in the static case. The potential goes as 1/r, but it is the field strength that is measured (and gives the strain).
However, for any time-dependent radiation, the leading-order term of the field strength falls off as 1/r. This is true for dipole as well as for quadrupole radiation. Because of the appearance of time-dependent terms, the derivatives in the field equations produce all terms from 1/r, 1/r2,... to 1/rs, where s would be 2 for (non-existent) monopole radiation, 3 for dipole radiation (electromagnetic, e.g.), 4 for quadrupole radiation (gravitation), and so on.
A consequence of the leading order term being 1/r is that the energy current goes as 1/r2 in leading order and that means that energy can be radiated away. Which would not be the case, if the leading-order term fell off faster than 1/r.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Does any one have some experience with creating 3D geometries with FreeCAD and subsequently editing it to the OpenFOAM CFD software? Could you share any tutorial or demo links with me?
You cannot directly import a CAD file into Openfoam. You need to convert it into a good surface mesh (STL) and then use snappyHexMesh or cfMesh to create a hex-dominant mesh. Then, use checkMesh utility to verify the mesh quality. Also, you can visualize the mesh in Paraview.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I came across a document where the authors have generated 2d terrain from an experimental flume. Images are attached. I would like to generate 2D geometry of a tilting flume for 2d analysis. I have dimension/1d geometry of the flume.
Reference images
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am working on geometry of banach spces and applications in metric fixed point theory , especially  my interesting is renorming of Banach spaces, Is anyone interested in collaboration
I am interested in the applications of Fixed Point Theory to differential and integrodifferential equations (fractional o generalized). Can be?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am not able to import the parameters in ANSYS which are necessary for optimization. I tried different file types like step, sat and iges . I am using fusion360 for CAD. How should i import the design with parameters?
I know this is an old question however at this moment you still cannot CAD link between Ansys and Fusion360 like you can with Inventor or Solidworks. You can send a study from fusion to Ansys however this does not allow you to use the design exploration tools. Depending on model complexity you could import a step file into design space and use that to create the parameters and then use assembly joint in ansys to put your model back together again as you may have to make it a multibody component to allow for the dimensional behavior that you are looking to optimise.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi,
I am looking for recommendations of any open source geodynamic modelling software that could help me model how the style of subduction initiation impacts the geometry of the resulting slab?
By "style of subduction initiation", I mean spontaneous (e.g. mantle plume, passive margin or transform collapse) or induced (transference or polarity reversal). So theoretically, I want to input the characteristics of these styles and see the geometry of the slab produced.
Thanks,
Shane
Image from Stern and Gerya (2018)
How about ASPECT(https://aspect.geodynamics.org/), which is supported by CIG (Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics). It's easy to get started , but I haven't use ASPECT for subduction initiation. And I think you could have a brief look about it , I hope it's useful to you (https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect).
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am currently working on a project that includes pencil geometry Cs-137 sources and lattice geometry. I try to obtain the voxel dose by using the f6 tally and my simulation was successful but my dose distribution is not looking homogeneous. Geometry and source to surface distance are symmetrically created. So, I should have homogeneous distributions. I used this source definition below. Is there anything wrong or can you advise me of a physics card in order to get more homogeneous dose distributions?
sdef pos=d4 par=2 rad=d1 ext=d2 axs=0 1 0 erg=0.662
c
c RADIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOURCE
si1 0 0.5375
sp1 -21 1
c
c VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOURCE
si2 -4.40 4.40
sp2 -21 0
c
si4 L 7.2 -8.98825 0
7.2 0.00275 0
7.2 8.98925 0
sp4 D 1 1 1
phys:p 100 0 0 0 0 J 0
Hi,
In any set-up, there are deep-seated areas where large relative errors are recorded after simulation; perhaps, this account for the observed inhomogeneity in your result.
Endeavour to reposition the source, redefine the source location in terms of (x, y, z) with the target distribution size or area in mind. Take note that homogenous distribution is short range, so locate your source close to your target area of interest.
I hope you find this suggestion useful.
Best regards,
Olaseni M. Bello.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hello everyone
Can I use Vina to dock analogues of nucleotides triphosphates into a polymerase active site coordinating Mg ions?
The ions are also typically in coordination with water molecules to satisfy their proper geometry.
Is it possible to do such docking while, at least, Mg ions are kept at the active site?
If not, is there any open-source docking tool to to such docking?
Check out the answers to this question: https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_Mn_based_metal_atom_parameter_add_to_autodock, they are also valid for other ions that are not recognised by default.
get the parameter file from http://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/parameters/AD4_parameters.dat/view and follow the instructions kindly provided by @Nur Aqilah Zahirah Norazmi
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi,
I am having problems optimizing already computed excited states. This is my input: #rb3lyp/Gen pseudo=read scf=(maxcycle=400, conver=6) opt TD=(Read, Root=7)
My problem: How do I refer to the output file with the computed excited states? I put it in the same folder and tried adding the file name to the headline: #rb3lyp/Gen pseudo=read scf=(maxcycle=400, conver=6) opt TD=(Read, Root=7) NA_T_50states.log
but it didn’t work.
Follow
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
How do I compute the height of tallest skyscraper of Wuhan (Wuhan Greenland center) from S1A images using radar geometry?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Dear all,
I have a Abaqus script that repeats a lattice structure in two dimension. I am modeling lattice cells as solids with their wall thickness. And geometry is a plate-like structure with a smaller out of plane thickness compared to other lengths.
However, i want to roll this structure into a tube like geometry. The result I'm trying to achieve is actually a tube with lattice walls. I want to write this Abaqus script parametrically in terms of mesh repetitions and relative density.
If anyone has any ideas on how to do this and can help I'd be very happy.
Dear Prof. Osman Eroğlu,
It can be modeled with each ring. Also, the lattice of the rings can be 0-360.
I wish you good studies.
Best regards
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I have imported a structure on ABAQUS that was designed on SOLIDWORKS, after importing the structure opens but there are invalid geometries that appear on the structure making meshing impossible. I would like to know what to do to solve this problem so that meshing can be done.
Try to click "Cobine into single part - > Merge soild regions" when you import your sat file into the part modulue of ABAQUS. I had the same probelm today and fixed it with the strategy.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi all. I want to create mapped mesh ( same nodes on opposite sides mapped and aligned with each other) for different geometry on opposite surfaces of a cuboid in y direction (top and bottom surface are having different features ) as shown in two figures ? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks all.
Devorshi Bhattacharjee Under COSMOL, in the Mesh ribbon toolbar (Windows), select Mapped from the Generators>Boundary () option. Choose Mapped from the Boundary menu () (3D components) from the Mesh contextual toolbar (macOS and Linux) or click Mapped (2D components). Mapped may be selected by right-clicking a Mesh node.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hello all,
I am currently presenting a problem on a model that has among its contact interactions, one that is of special interest.
I am modelling human bone in contact with a metal implant. The contact interaction is defined with normal and tangential behaviors and with a 0.5 friction coefficient. The process that I am doing is removing bone from the contact interaction zone. Hence I have 6 different models with a different volume removed on each of them.
As a result of this action, I would expect Von Mises stress and contact pressure to increase in the implant, and the contact area to decrease. Interestingly, that behavior is presented in the first model that I cut. Nevertheless, as I increase the deepness of the cut (or remove more bone section) , Von Mises starts to decrease and contact area starts to increase despite contact pressure increasing.
I was suggested to check my mesh. Nonetheless, I performed a mesh analysis test on the geometry before being cut and selected the best matching mesh with a 1% difference criteria. Thus, I am unsure about what could be happening as the only thing changing in my models is the geometry based on my cuts.
I attach an image of the numerical behaviour experiencing.
Thanks for the help.
Hi Mir Aamir Abbas,
I'm sorry for the late response. I was trying to solve it. Basically the main problem was that despite my surfaces having a hemispherical geometry, contact was not well established. This was regardless of having a mesh fine in the zone of contact.
To solve the problem, I had to smooth the surfaces in contact, which allowed to obtain credible results.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
The translation surfaces parametrized r(x,y)=(x,y,f(x)+g(y)) are obtained by translating two curves lying in orthonogal planes. What about the affine translation surfaces parametrized R(x,y)=(x,y,f(x)+g(y+ax)) for nonzero constant a ? Could the affine translation surfaces be geometrically described such as that of translation surfaces?
The replacement {x = x', y = y' + ax'} causes the surface to deform. This change of coordinates represents a Galilean motion. This replacement preserves the total curvature of the surface, even the Euclidean total curvature.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi all
I am trying to simulate soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication is rubber seals. In this case I have to prestress the seal by compressing it between housing and the shaft. I want to use this deformed geometry along with its residual stress to run a fluid-structure interaction(FSI) simulation. I know how to export the deformed geometry but does anyone know how to export the deformed geometry along with its residual stresses?
Thank you
Hi,
I have a similar problem.
Did you succeed in finding a solution?
Thank you
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi, how can I define the Casimir force which acts between plates of a parallel plate capacitor while performing electrostatic - solid mechanics simulation in COMSOL Multiphysics?
The specialty of the Casimir force is that it varies with the plate displacement. It is inversely proportional to the fourth-power of the distance between two plates:
[ForceCasimir ~ 1/(initial separation between plates - plate displacement)4]
It acts only when spacing between two plates is of few nanometers.
Well, I don't know that much about the effect, but you will access to some displacement variables on the moving mesh (https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.comsol/comsol_ref_deformedmeshes.25.05.html), and they will give you the plate displacement, so you should be able to set up a force on a boundary which is a function of this plate displacement.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
How does shape anisotropy varies with change in hall cross geometry?
Thank you so much sir.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi everyone,
Is there a method to divide the imported part into multiple parts within Abaqus CAE?
I am working on a model in Abaqus CAE with a geometry imported from a .STEP file. I need to define non-design regions by defining parts which are separate from the design region. For example, the design region must be named Part-1, while the remaining of the geometry is divided into Part-2, Part-3, etc. However, the whole geometry is imported as a single part from the .STEP file even though I check the "create individual parts" option during the import process.
Please note that, since I need the non-design regions to be in different parts, I cannot use the partitioning methods (e.g. cell partitioning).
Have you found a solution to this that you tried and works?. I am in similar boat with slight variation, I would like to just partition and assign a different material to my step file. However abaqus is not allowing me to partition.
Kind Regards,
AM
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am simulating a hydraulic jump in a rectangular flume that has an inlet and an tailgate at outlet. I need to adjust the tail gate opening to get the desired hydraulic jump. So i simulated the case for few time steps but now I want to drop the tail-gate further to obstruct the flow.
I have duplicated the geometry,mesh and setup , then i changed the dimension of my tail-gate (there by closing the outlet opening below the tail-gate further) . I have initialised the case with the existing .cdat file from the previous simulation. But the console shows me DIVERGENCE immediately after running the calculations.I even updated the mesh and re-cheked the setup Could help me with this?
Thank you Ahmed Al-Manea , Kristaq Hazizi and Erfan Rahimi so much. I apologise for such a late reply . All of your answers are valuable towards solving my problem.
Well , I managed to overcome this problem simply by reading the case file and data file in stand alone fluent solver and changing the boundary conditions(tail gate height) each time.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Is there any mathematical equation that relates the shape/geometry of metasurfaces with their light confinement properties? Why does C-shaped metasurface behave differently than L-shaped?
Of course, the wave equation, through the boundary conditions that define the surface and its properties.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
There are multiple methods to calculate cold and hot outlet temperatures, e.g. LMTD and P-NTU.
1. P-NTU directly calculates both the hot and cold outlet temperatures using two linear equations based on (a) exchangers geometry (b) flow and (c) heat-capacity of the fluids.
2. LMTD based method requires (a) exchangers geometry (b) flow (c) heat-capacity of the fluids and (d) one of the outlet temperatures to calculate the remaining outlet temperature.
(Note : LMTD method can find both the outlet temperatures, if heat exchanger is single-pass)
Both the methods give same answers (while designing and rating heat exchangers) !
My question is as follows:
Is recursive type calculations in LMTD can be considered as a drawback of LMTD method? , Particularly in heat exchanger networks?
Recursive vs. one-step calculations are of little concern with current computer resources and readily available software. The bigger issue arises from the fact that these two methods solve the same separable differential equation, but using different assumptions when separating the variables before integrating. This means that the two different methods handle some things differently, like implicitly/explicitly averaging properties, heat transfer coefficients, etc. You should consider EPRI TR-107397 (Service Water Heat Exchanger Testing Guidelines). The principal author of 1997 version is Jeffrey Rabensteine of Power Generation Technologies, here in Knoxville. The 2015 version was updated by Lindon C. Thomas, who is a friend and also lives in Knoxville. Dr. Thomas is a renown authority on the P-NTU method and wrote a textbook covering the subject https://www.amazon.com/Lindon-C-Thomas/e/B001HOVPI4
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
So my geometry has two solids which I have to rotate in a certain angle for every simulation with the mesh, so I choose fluent meshing where I can rotate my geometry but after rotating the geometry the mesh nodes doesn't match in the connecting points of the geometry, how can I match the nodes.
Hi, if you used Ansys SpaceClaim for geometry, then just use share topology between regions you have. the mesh would be conformal automatically.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
In first order watersheds, can the shape index (Ff=A/Lb²) and the elongation ratio (Er=(2/Lb)*(A/Pi^0.5) return values >= 1?
Working with large watersheds, these values tend to be < or = unity. However, working on small hydrographic basins (1st order) I find some volers above the unit.
Is there any convention that the values of Ff and Er cannot exceed unity?
Thanks.
It is necessary to define the parameters which are in your formula Ff=A/Lb² because in this form Ff is not dimensionless.
Usually, the following parameters are defined for the watershed:
1. Form factor: Watershed Area/(Watershed length)2 = A/L2, Value < 1
2. Shape factor Bs : (Watershed length)2/Watershed Area = L/A2, Value > 1
3. Elongation ratio: Diameter of the circle of watershed area / Watershed length = 1.128A0.5 /L, Value < or equal to 1.
4. Circulatory ratio: Watershed area/Area of the circle of watershed area = 12.57A/P2, where P is the watershed perimeter, Value < or equal to 1
5. Compactness Coefficient: Watershed perimeter/perimeter of the circle of watershed area = 0.2821P/A0.5, Value > or equal to 1.
Regards
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi,
I have determined the velocity profile of fluid in my geometry (both 2D and 3D). However, from here, I do not know how to proceed to find the wall shear stress in my geometry.
Can anyone provide me step by step details please. I am not well-versed with Matlab, however, I can try if I have been given few leads.
Kindly help.
Thanks
The shear stress can be calculated using the formula, dynamic_viscosity*shear_rate (mu*(vx+uy)).
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I am trying to analyse a large structure with multiple loading scenarios (independent - different loading directions), while considering geometric non-linearity. Using different steps is not sufficient, since each step starts off with the geometry shaped as it was at the end of the previous step.
I tried creating a dummy step just to deactivate all the loads from the previous step, but the non-linearity causes some distortion to remain even without any loads.
One obvious solution is to run each step in a separate analysis, but the model is quite large and the input file processing takes about about as much time as it takes the solver to solve a step, which would immediately double the time required to obtain the entire solution and there would also be redundant information in the result files (mesh data repeated in each result file). So creating a separate analysis for each step is something that I am trying to avoid for the moment.
Nils Wagner Here's a sample job that I created, which should be enough to understand the situation. There are 3 steps with loads (Step-1, Step-2 & Step-3) and 2 dummy steps (Step-1_D & Step-2_D) which only exist to deactivate the loads from the previous step.
This is not the actual model that I am working on, since I don't think I am at a liberty to share that. But the problem is exactly the same. Here the loading is in 3 different directions, which need to be evaluated independently of each other. To save on computation time, I am trying to do them as different Steps in the same analysis rather than create a separate analysis for each direction, but it does not seem to be working out very well so far.
Please let me know if you would like any more details.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Tech laptop specs:
Asus Rogue Strix G
Video card: 4 Gb
Intel CORE I7 9TH Gen Turing Architecture
Ram 24GB
At the bottom part o the comsol windows screen show 3.1Gb / 3.8Gb I know this is Physical /Virtual Memory
1. How could be possible that use more virtual memory than physical? "it is frustrating"
2. But The computing time is taking Too much time (45 minutes ), why COMSOL does not take more memory from my 24Gb of RAM?
3. Can configure Comsol four using a specific amount of memory?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
neutron shielding
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Different geometry of unique nanomaterials
1. We know that nature of bulk materials and nanoscale materials. Bulk material has been large and smaller crystallite size, but nano materials having unique nature. Although nanomaterials exist 10-100 nm range, that’s why different geometry of same nanomaterials have different photo-absorption and harvesting capacity.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi ,
My name is Ömer and I'm doing a research which involve a simulation in ansys fluent of an single stage axial compressor.
Idont know how to criated a blade geometry in bladegen for axial compressor. I made a meanline analysis with criate an EXCEL program to look literature.
I'm also beginner in simulations, so I want to know how to use cfx for criate my compressors map and another analysis things.
If you help me about it, I will be really happy because I dont have too much time for learn.
Dear omer,
Best regards
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Does anyone know of any image analysis software that can be used to determine the geometry changes before and after working and compare their sizes, I am looking for alternative methods to CMM?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
ZnO samples are being synthesized at 400 C
Yes kittidhaj is right... Geometry is causing a issue
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hello,
I am running airflow simulation through a model of lungs. I want to find the velocities and pressures at certain locations. I tried creating ISO-surfaces but this surface cuts through the whole geometry and I want only specific locations on the geometry as shown by the colored lines in the figure. Is there a way to create a plane at the location of these lines exactly that will give only this branch? I want to find the velocities and pressures at the end of each branch.
Have you figured out the solution? If yes please share it. I am stuck with the same problem.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
I was doing the calculation of the excited state of the molecule in gaussian but each time after some intermediate geometries my link die. I am unable to get the excited state geometry of the molecule. Can anyone provide me a solution?
I presume you're using some software you didn't write but got from someone else and you're seeking an answer to a runtime error? If that is the case, we would need to know what software you're referring to.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
algebraic geometry
The projective plane satisfies the following axioms:
A. Any two distinct points are contained in a unique line.
B. Any two distinct lines are intersected in a unique point.
C. There exists four distinct points no three of them are collinear.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
During optimization the geometries tend to change from one symmetry group to another, therefore the output file does not produce the intended structure because of change of symmetry. I want to fix the symmetry in Gaussian so that the structure remains the same during optimization. Any one to help me please.
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
The molecules contain Fe, B,C,H, F. The scf energies are very close to converging but they just don't converge. I tried increasing the scf cycles, changing the input geometry etc. I am using the basis set of def2tzvpd.
Hi, I am not used to Q-Chem and RI-MP2 methods. But I have found several techniques to improve convergence on this page: https://manual.q-chem.com/5.3/sect_convergence.html
In general, it is useful to look at the last energy values of the SCF procedure. If the energy oscillates, maybe some damping is enough to favour the convergence. If the energy always decreases and does not oscillate (a pare from rare cases), maybe you should increase the maximum number of steps.
I found some details on how to deal with damping on Q-Chem here: https://manual.q-chem.com/5.3/sect_damp.html
I hope this may help
Best regards
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
In the Comsol reference manual moving mesh is suggested for solving RF MEMS switches. But the problem is more consistent with deforming geometry because usually the space between membrane and substrate is filled with air and the strain is not important here. is this interpretation correct? and can be deforming geometry can be used for this problem?
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Why can't we delete questions here?
Editing and deleting questions is well described topic at RG Help Center page:
• asked a question related to Geometry
Question
Hi,
I am running MD simulations of a Gold-chelate compound with square planar geometry of Au (III). I parametrized the missing force field parameters for Au and its four neighboring atoms using MCPB and VFFDT properly. The issue is that after the full minimization step (without restraint) in MD simulations, the geometry of Au (III) changes from square planar to tetrahedral which is undesired. Could you please guide me on how to solve the issue?
Thanks