Science topic

GPower - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in GPower, and find GPower experts.
Questions related to GPower
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
As sample size calculation is extremely important for RCT, are there any recommendations for simple tools? For example, can GPower be used for the calculation for RCT?
Relevant answer
Answer
Standard practice seems to be to power the study to detect specific between group comparisons on the primary outcome or outcomes. If there is no clustering (i.e., it isn't multi-site etc.) this reduces to one or more t tests or ANCOVA if you have baseline primary outcome measures as covariate (which. typically increases power). So you could in principle treat this as one or more t tests (in the absence of clustering) and use something like GPower. If the outcome is dichotomous you might use a Chi-square test or similar.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Dear community,
I can't seem to find any clear information on power analyses work so I'm throwing my question out onto the internet hoping for answers. :)
Study Details
I am doing a within-subjects design with two independent factors. The dependent variable is binary correct/incorrect.
There are 18 test items.
9 items vs 9 items for Condition A (2 levels)
3 vs 3 vs 3 within each of those 9 for Condition B (3 levels)
I want to be able to detect significance for an Odds Ratio of 1.800, 2-tailed.
In a similar experiment, the lowest mean for a condition was .177.
Question
My question is how I should use GPower to get a minimum sample size?
I've tried z tests -> logistic regression and it gives me a sample of 533, but there is no field to input the number of measures or independent variables, so I'm not sure how to interpret the result.
Or does it mean that I need that many individua
Am I dividing that number by 18 for the 18 test items? (approximately 30 people)
Am I dividing it by the number of conditions? (3x2=6 - approximately 90 people)l participants? (impossible)
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Ah I see, thanks!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
How to use GPower for unknown population ?
hope anyone can teach up .
Relevant answer
Answer
There are two options here:
1. Either tighten the inclusion and exclusion criteria and define the size of your population.
2. Use government data to estimate the size of the universe/population.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
I've recently submitted a manuscript, which was sent back to me with reviewers' comments and suggestions. In one of them, they asked me to perform a sensitivity power analysis given my actual sample size. My experimental design was a three-group intervention (i.e., one control and two experimental conditions) with a binary outcome. I've been struggling to define which family and statistical test I should choose for that purpose (I'm using GPower), for example: an F test family, in which I can add the number of groups and select an ANOVA fixed effects test, or a z test, in which I cannot include the number of groups but I it is the type of model I used to test my hypothesis.
I'm not sure if my reasoning is correct, but I'd much appreciate any help you can provide!
Relevant answer
Answer
Initially, I did not understand the question either. But a search on <G*Power sensitivity analysis> took me to a document by my colleague Karl Wuensch. It includes the screen capture image I attached to this post. In Karl's example, d=0.093136 is the minimum value of Cohen's d that would have been significant with the observed sample size (and all other things being equal).
Isabel Tostes Ribeiro, what kind of statistical test did you use? That will determine which Test Family and Statistical Test options you must choose (see the 2nd attached image).
HTH.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
8 answers
Hello everyone, does anyone know how to calculate the simple size for a 2(gender: male, female)*2(culture: Asian, European)*2(age: children, adult)*2(direction: back, front)*2(position: left, right)*2( condition: confort, non-comfort) repeated ANOVA? We have 6 factors, among these, gender and culture are between-factors, while age, direction, position, and condition are within-factors. I'd appreciate it if someone can help me.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Hsin-Yuan Che, your are so nice, thanks again!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
I'm planning to use a cox regression in a future study exploring time-to-event or survival analysis comparing a control with an experimental group. I've seen sample size calculated through several packages, but I prefer G*Power and wanted to know if anyone's done this. Any resources would be appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Eden,
No, g*power doesn't have a direct method to estimate N for Cox regression models. However, here are some links that will get you on your way:
1. A previous RGate reply to a similar question, with links to formulae as well as a couple of online sample size calculators:
2. Guidance for degree to which a target covariate is independent of any other covariates in a model, and general sample size estimation:
3. Guidance for minimum events per variable, based on a simulation study performed on a large, real data set:
Good luck with your work.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
13 answers
Hi, I am looking for different approaches to calculate sample size for a repeated measures within subject design. What is the critique for using GPower and is it justified? And what are reliable alternatives? Is R really a good alternative or truly just doing the same as GPower?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
DISCLAIMER: I have limited knowledge of G*Power. But AFAICT, it uses Cohen's t-shirt size (S, M, L) effect size estimates as input. In this short document, Russ Lenth explains why he does not recommend doing that:
See also this opinion piece describing some other issues with G*Power:
Regarding your request for alternatives to G*Power, are you looking for free software only, or are you open to commercial products?
What statistical software do you use currently?
Finally, have you thought about using simulation for power analysis?
Thanks for clarifying.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Please could someone help me to calculate the sample size I would need for Moderation Analysis (Hayes' model 2) - I am interested in considering how attachment style (avoidant vs anxious) moderates the relationship between cognitive behavioural therapy and outcome measure (PHQ-9).
How do I work out sample size using G-Power?
Independant variable: Mode of delivery (online versus remote delivery)
Moderation variables: 1) Anxious attachment style and 2) Avoidant attachment style
Dependant variable: Score on Patient Health Questionnaire
There are no co-variates.
Relevant answer
Answer
I recommend the attachment here, the paper is available for download. The sample size calculations would be the same as any other regression. G*power should work for you. Best wishes David Booth
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
I am working on a study which involves moderated mediation analysis (1 IV, 1 Mod, 1 Med, 3 DVs), and I need to calculate the required sample size for my analysis. Is there any software or guideline I can follow for this task? Ideally, I wish to learn the principles so that I can apply for other situations as well. I have been using GPower but it does not have the option for moderated mediation analysis.
Relevant answer
Answer
One general approach to sample size planning for complex models like yours uses Monte Carlo simulation. I offer a free workshop on sample size planning via simulation in the Mplus software at goquantfish.com
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
I have two experiments one with 3 participants as a group and the other with 4 participants as a group. How would I calculate the sample size if I would like to use HLM analysis? (medium effect size alpha 0.05 power 0.80) Thank you in advance!!
Relevant answer
Answer
I think you already have sample size in groups. Do you mean calculation of power¿
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
10 answers
Does control group included when calculating the sample size using Gpower F test one way ANOVA? I have 3 study groups to compare with a control group (4th group). When calculating sample size using Gpower, the number of groups should be 3 or 4?
Relevant answer
Answer
Neelu Joshi has rightly mentioned that the data in the control group are to be used in analysis. Note that control group is also a group under study.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Good day Gurus!
I am new to research and which test to run as well as sample size.
I have three pre-tests (two scales and a writing prompt- gathering data from the writing), participants than randomized into three groups, separate intervention for each group, then three post-tests(writing prompt to test if there is a change from the intervention and same two scales from pre-test) with a survey at the end. I am evaluating the changes after the intervention, to hopefully see a positive change.
I have tried GPower, yet not sure how to pick the test which would give me sample size. I am thinking a multivariate comparison, yet that is why I am asking.
Independent Variables - Intervention
Dependent Variables - positive change, post-test scales, second writing prompt that should change due to intervention
Controls - Pre-test scales
Suggestions?
Thank you in advance. JDM
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Jason,
Assuming you're actually going for multivariate comparisons, you could use:
1. Multivariate regression (the grouping variable would be recast into two dummy variates to capture the information about three independent groups);
2. Manova
G*Power offers manova computations, which will mirror those of the multivariate regression, for a given effect (model term).
In either choice, how you treat the pre/post scores will make a difference. Your options are: (a) include both (this makes for a repeated measures dimension; in the regression approach, you'll have to include group X occasion interaction terms; you'll get these automatically in the manova; or (b) use the pre-treatment scores as covariates (just force them in the regression model as IVs along with the treatment variables), or declare them as covariates in the manova.
If you opt for the repeated measures framework, then the treatment X occasions interaction is usually the effect of interest. In the covariate framework, you're essentially comparing treatments on post-treatment scores, adjusted for pre-treatment differences.
Finally, though a lot of people say they want multivariate comparisons, it is quite common to see all of the attention focused on univariate outcomes in such studies.
Good luck with your work.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
7 answers
Please help: I need to calculate the g*power for my study. I have two predictor variables and one criterion variable. All measured as continuous scale.
Three research questions: Rq1-Does mindset predict GPA? Rq2-Does SES predict GPA? Rq3-Does mindset predict Gpa while moderating for SES?
I’m thinking that rq1&rq2 needs a simple linear regression/bivariate regression.
Im thinking rq3 needs a moderated multiple regression.
Will I run gpower once or twice? (For Two seperate test?)
What type of gpower is best for linear regression with two predictor variables and one dependent variable?
Relevant answer
Answer
use the SPSS program to analyze your data
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
7 answers
Hi everybody, I have a question about calculating the sample size with the software. There is various software such as GPower and NCSS. PASS in this area. which one is better? Can anyone guide me? For example; how can I work with NCSS. PASS software? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
It is not free.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
David Morse you helped me previously, please can I check with you my question is : the impact of working from home on loneliness, creativity and resilience. I know I will be using multivariate regression but what am I putting in G Power to work out the sample size. I am assuming possible control variables of 1)ethnicity, 2)education level, 3) type of work and my IV is working from home. My 3 DVs are loneliness, creativity and resilience. What is the best way to work out the sample size please?
Is a-priori analysis with an effect of f2 of 0.08 reasonable, and alpha of 0.05 and power of 0,95 ? which test is best? and how do I do this please? I think you mentioned a generic F Test or Manova
Relevant answer
Answer
Neeta Jain , oh, in that case it should be something like:
power rsquared 0.1 0.2, n(142) ntested(1) ncontrol(3)
As you have 3 control and one IV, right? And for example let's say that the for the first DV you have:
. power rsquared 0.1 0.2, n(106) ntested(1) ncontrol(3)
Estimated power for multiple linear regression
F test for R2 testing subset of coefficients
H0: R2_F = R2_R versus Ha: R2_F != R2_R
Study parameters:
alpha = 0.0500
N = 106
delta = 0.1250
R2_R = 0.1000
R2_F = 0.2000
R2_diff = 0.1000
ncontrol = 3
ntested = 1
Estimated power:
power = 0.9500
But for the second (and third, let's say), you have instead:
. power rsquared 0.1 0.15, n(223) ntested(1) ncontrol(3)
Estimated power for multiple linear regression
F test for R2 testing subset of coefficients
H0: R2_F = R2_R versus Ha: R2_F != R2_R
Study parameters:
alpha = 0.0500
N = 223
delta = 0.0588
R2_R = 0.1000
R2_F = 0.1500
R2_diff = 0.0500
ncontrol = 3
ntested = 1
Estimated power:
power = 0.9501
So while a sample of n = 106 is enough to achieve a power of 95% for the first dependent variable, for the second and third you need a sample of n = 223. Hence, your sample should be n = 223, in order to properly detect effects in all DVs. In short, what I would is calculating the power for each DV and then take the largest sample needed to properly detect effects in all DVs
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
I am running different tests (t-tests, correlation, anova) and therefore have computed different power analyses. Should I report all of these, or only the test which needs the most participants to ensure enough power (as therefore all other tests will have enough power)? Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Agree Salah Ahmed
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
Hey everyone!
I wonder what is the right way to calculate my sample size for two unrelated groups comparison if I am to base my effect size on the MDC and SD of my primary outcome.
In g power when going to the effect size calculation there is a place to enter the mean and SD of two groups. So what should I type there?
Thanks!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hi. I am currently doing a research to compare between balanced and unbalanced bilinguals. I did a Gpower but I am not convinced whether that is the right amount or not as I have read previous literature, and the amount of the bilinguals in their research is not that big. Hence, I would really appreciate it if you could share with me any articles regarding this issue. Thank you so much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Please have a look at this book:
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2011, 7th edn.) Research Methods in Education (7th edn.), London: Routledge.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
6 answers
Hi, I want to perform an a priori power analysis to determine the sample size for my study. I have one between subject variable with two levels (I assume number of groups = 2), three dependent variables (I assume response variables = 3). I am just interest in the main- and mediation effects. Alpha and Power are specified in the picture. Now, I was wondering about the effect-size categories (small, medium, large) because I cannot find anything about Pillai's V. What would be a medium effect size for f^2 (V)? Also, I thought that for MANOVAs, the partial eta-squared is indicating the effect size?
Best!
Relevant answer
Answer
And how to convert to f(v) (pillai)?
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
6 answers
Hi everyone,
I tested an SEM model with 2 IV, 4 mediators and 1 DV on a sample of 1000 participants (see attached figure). Could you please help me to find an estimation for a good sample size using power analysis for this multiple-mediator model.
Best,
Robin
Relevant answer
Answer
We were asked to provide a power analysis for a sample size of 20 in PLS-PM, fair enough. We did it. You can see in Radosevic, S. and Yoruk, E. (2013) Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems, Research Policy, 42(5). But, I agree with remarks here that with a sample size of 1000 you should be fine unless the reviewers ask for it.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Hi all, I'm currently working on a research to finish my masters in Marketing. But I'm struggling with what test to run and how to estimate the sample size by using the GPower tool.
I'm investigating the following relationship: IV (2levels) --> DV (interval scale), and how a moderator (2levels) affects this relationship. I'm conducting a mixed design, the IV is measured within-subjects, and the moderator is measured between-subjects. There are also covariates added.
Do I need to run an ANCOVA or an ANOVA repeated measures?
Thanks a lot, in advance!
Best,
Fleur
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
In G Power run under F test /ANCOVA fixed Effects, main effects, and interactions to calculate the sample size.
This will not account for repeated measures. However, that may be not of immediate concern apriori.
For MODERATOR analysis you can download PROCESS macro by Andrew Hays and install in SPSS or other software and use it.
There are model numbers given where you can add the moderator variables in Parallel or Sequential ways between the IV and DV. Also, covariates can be added. It is advisable to go through tutorials on Haye's procedure on youtube to find the right way. His site also has a manual for easy understanding on the procedures.
On SPSS Amos you can also do both linear regression and moderator effects yogether.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
24 answers
Hi, everyone
In relation with the statistical power analysis, the relationship between effect size and sample size has crucial aspects, which bring me to a point that, I think, most of the time, this sample size decision makes me feel confusing. Let me ask something about it! I've been working on rodents, and as far as I know, a prior power analysis based on an effect size estimate is very useful in deciding of sample size. When it comes to experimental animal studies, providing the animal refinement is a must for researchers, therefore it would be highly anticipated for those researchers to reduce the number of animals for each group, just to a level which can give adequate precision for refraining from type-2 error. If effect size obtained from previous studies prior to your study, then it's much easier to estimate. However, most of the papers don't provide any useful information neither on means and standard deviations nor on effect sizes. Thus it makes it harder to make an estimate without a plot study. So, in my case, when taken into account the effect size which I've calculated using previous similar studies, sample size per group (4 groups, total sample size = 40 ) should be around 10 for statistical power (0.80). In this case, what do you suggest about the robustness of checking residuals or visual assessments using Q-Q plots or other approaches when the sample size is small (<10) ?
Kind regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
I cannot agree with the practice of estimating sample size based on previous studies. There are a number of important reasons for this.
1. The most important reason is that the sample size should have adequate power to detect the smallest effect size that is clinically significant. It doesn't matter what previous researchers have reported. If there is a clinically significant effect, then the study should have the power to detect it.
For instance, previous research may have shown that mask wearing reduces risk of Covid transmission by 50%. Fine. But even a 20% reduction in transmission risk is of considerable public health importance, so your study should be capable of detecting this. A study powered to detect a 20% risk reduction is, of course, comfortably powered to detect anything bigger.
2. The second reason is that early studies can suffer from, well, early study syndrome.
a) They are done by people who really believe in the effect, and who are prepared to put in unusual efforts to make the study work, so the study may have unrealistic levels of input.
b) Early studies take place in a context where protocols are evolving, and so the methodological quality is often lower – we learn by our mistakes; I'm not blaming early researchers!
c) They are more likely to be published if they find something interesting (a significant effect size).
And might I add that if your research actually matters there is no excuse for 80% power. It's a lazy habit. It's not ethical to run research that has a baked-in 20% chance of failing to find an important effect. Participants give their time and work for nothing (and animals give their lives). We have an ethical duty not to waste these on research that has one chance in five of failing to find something useful if it really exists.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hello! I am wondering for the value of power to put as input parameters when computing the critical effect size via a sensitivity analysis on Gpower. Indeed, given that "typically, although not always, a critical effect size correspond to the effect size the study had 50% power to detect" (Lenth, 2007, cited by Lakens et al., 2018), should we put 50% in the power input estimates in senstitivity analysis (like we put 33% when using the small telescope approach) or Gpower calculates critical ES automatically with the "standard" 80%, 90% or 95% (or other) of power ? Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
For a sensitivity analysis I'd normally plot power as a function of a number of other parameters/inputs. So power on the y axis and n or effect size on the x axis with different lines and panels for other parameters.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
5 answers
I am conducting an experiment with one within factor (8 levels), and will use a RM ANOVA to analyze the data. I would like to find the appropriate sample size using power, alpha and effect size from a previous study (eta² = 0.6).
How can I do this?
GPower is recommended a lot, but it tells me a sample size of only 2 subjects is enough.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
24 answers
Hi, I have a simple question.
I am hoping to perform a power analysis/sample size estimation for an RCT. We will be controlling for baseline symptoms, and using post-treatment or change scores as our outcome variable, Ie we will use an "ANCOVA" designs showed to increase power: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3671-2
Would any body be able to point me towards the best tool for sample size estimation for such a model?
thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
In response to --> so why adjusting?
In a true experiment with random allocation to groups (i.e., an RCT) that has both baseline and follow-up measures on the outcome variable, the principle reason for including the baseline measure as a covariate is to reduce the error term. Variability in the follow-up measure (i.e., the DV) that is accounted for by the linear relationship between baseline and follow-up scores is partialled out of the error term. The cost is 1 df. But that cost is usually more than made up for by the reduction in SSerror.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
GPower is only equipped to deal with calculations of bivariate regressions and needs SD s for both predictor samples.
However, if one has a multiple regression with more than 2 outcome variables (multivariate) , is there a way to calculate sample size with an alpha of 0.05 and assuming a moderate effect size of 0.35 apriori?
thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
For once I would not recommend David Eugene Booth 's advice as there is no guarantee of quality if you simply Google. My advice would be to use G* Power which is the widely recommended free software for sample size calculations. There is also a table on this specific subject in Andy Field's textbook on discovering statistics using SPSS.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hello, everyone. I have no idea about how to calculate the simple size if I used repeated- measures ANOVA with time (PRE vs POST) as the within-subject factor and group (young vs olderly) as the between-subjects factor. Am I going to use ANOVA:Repeated measures, within-between interaction? And I am not sure the number of measurements, is it four?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Hi, I am going to execute an experiment with the four categorical variables (A=2 levels, B=2 levels, C=2 levels, D= 5 levels) and one dependent continuous variable. There are total of 40 groups that I want to compare (2x2x2x5 = 40). For each group, I will hire separate participants, so it will be a between subject design. since I need to compare 40 different groups and any interaction effects, I need 4-way ANOVA.
In the GPower software, I selected the F test ANOVA (Fixed effects , special, main effects and interaction). See the Figure for more details. Now, my question is whether the total sample size is per group? Am I doing it right?
Relevant answer
Answer
Since you have lots of possible effects, you need to decide what effect sizes for each that you want to be able to detect, and how many of these that you want to detect. G*Power is more designed when there is a single effect of interest. Once you decide these, then I recommend using simulation to estimate power.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hello, I am conducting an experiment for my dissertation and looking at the effect that relaxing photos have at mood , physical and mental health. There is only one group that is going to be used for this study (there is no control group). Participants will be asked questions on mood, physical and mental health (3 dependent varibles ) presented with the photos (Indepented variable) and then asked the same questions prior to the exposure to photos. The point is to see if the photos will have an effect or what effect on these 3.
The problem is I dont know how to best analyse the data in SPSS and the steps I need to do, as well as find the sample size I need for the study using Gpower because I dont know what statistical test I am using and how to find the effect size.
Relevant answer
Answer
First of all it should be clear whether the variables are categorical or interval, as that determines the choice of statistical test and even sample size calculations. Looking at the research question the photos appear to be categorical, and the outcomes of mood and health can be either measured on a linear interval scale, if such scale is availabel and is planned to use, or categorical variable. Once the data type is finalized and clear, appropriate statistical test are easy to chose and apply.
Some youtube channel have step by step guides for SPSS. Use mock data sets to perform tests and analysis, that is how we can learn by doing, and later apply to our real dataset.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
I want to explore if the amount of time (usage) spent on the Social Media IV1, with two levels , one is light and the other is heavy use, Iv2, body image with negative and positive levels, Iv3 self-esteem with levels of high and low, and my DV is sexual satisfaction. If these variables have an effect on sexual satisfaction and I need to determine my sample size! please send me if you can help me! SOS!
Relevant answer
Answer
It is not clear if you are investigating sexual satisfaction on a gender basis (men vs women or individually).This can lead to a vast change in your outcome.
Sexuality, especially sexual intimacy (affective) is highly subjective as individuals or clusters (male or female or even LGBT) has different definitions and different functions.
The analysis of factors affecting sexual satisfaction regardless of for example the women sociocultural context, religious beliefs, and personal attitudes is undoubtedly inefficient, unscientific and irrational. This is problematic as you need to evaluate across your location of study (socio cultural context).
You could also look at qualitative studies or triangulation on sexual satisfaction on the understanding from gender perspective of sexual satisfaction based on their sociocultural contexts and you probably want to investigate different dimensions of sexual satisfaction in gay/straight men/women.
The aim(RO and RQ) of you study could be to explore affecting factors on sexual satisfaction based on an overview in scientific database. This needs to be clarified wit a strong research problem and theoretical underpinning. Within committed relationships, a wide range of factors may challenge or facilitate sexual satisfaction. The aim of your study must be to clarify which individual, partner, and partnership-related aspects of a sexual relationship are crucial for the prediction of sexual satisfaction. The study should included data of a representative sample of couples from the general population (e.g. . 1000 or more) to present a robust conclusion.
You may want to try using the the actor-partner interdependence model to estimate actor and partner effects. The calculate the overall predictors to explain % of outcome variance. Actor effects could be an important factor for sexual function, sexual distress, frequency of sexual activity, desire discrepancy, sexual initiative, sexual communication, sociosexual orientation, masturbation, and life satisfaction. While gender-specific partner effects might not be highly significant in these types of studies (sexual function and sexual distress), neither age, nor relationship duration are also significant predictors.
Outcomes such as sexual satisfaction has a very important role in creating marital satisfaction and any defect in sexual satisfaction is significantly associated with risky sexual behaviors, serious mental illness, social crimes and ultimately divorce.
The main objective of your study is to demystify sexual satisfaction and to clarify which aspects of a sexual relationship contribute most to satisfying sexual lives within your population.
Previous research on sexual satisfaction is that most predictors, such as sexual communication or sexual function have been examined in relative isolation, without taking other possible predictors into consideration.
To overcome limitations of previous studies that used convenience samples, restricted their sample to certain age groups or target populations or investigated certain predictor variables in isolation. To investigate the relative significance of different of sexuality-related factors of sexual satisfaction, you may want to include wide ranging predictors, namely sexual function and distress, frequency of sexual activities alone or with a partner as well as sexual desire discrepancy, sexual communication, and sociosexual attitudes. These factors can be employed to estimate the relevance of personal sexual attitudes and solitary sexual behaviors in comparison to factors that require a sexual partner. In addition to these sexuality related factors, you may want to included life satisfaction to control for a more general well-being, and other predictors (i.e., passage of time, household income) included to control for and to investigate their relevance for sexual satisfaction on an exploratory basis. Good luck.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
For my dissertation I am investigating help-seeking behaviour. Specifically, measuring help-seeking (actual and intended) using the GHSQ against different age groups, and also the effect of awareness of mental health campaigns (number of campaigns they are aware of). I am aware that gender may cause error variance, therefore have decided to measure gender also as a covariate. I am correct that to analyse this I would use a two-way ANCOVA? And how would I input this into GPower to calculate a sample size?
Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Amy Henderson and Alcides Barrichello quite right but don't forget you can use the General Linear Model approach and treat ANCOVA as a regression. I believe if you had a repeated measure ANCOVA this would be much easier. See ANCOVA in this reference: https://b-ok.cc/book/3591248/4df2ac
Best, David Booth
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hey all,
I conducted an experiment for my bachelors thesis where I used ordinal logistic regression to analyze the data. My two independent variables are binary and my dependent variable is ordinal.
Now I wonder how to find out the minimum sample size using results from my low-scale pilot test.
I have tried using gpower but couldn't find a guide which seems to suit my situation online and therefore am a little lost right now. Can I use the same calculations as with a normal logistic regression?
Best,
Fabio
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Fabio,
Congratulations on running a pilot study in order to get a better handle on plausible values for your study.
Here are a couple of resources that offer help for ordinal logistic models:
1. The R function, popower (https://rdrr.io/cran/Hmisc/man/popower.html)
3. This one, adapted from a journal article: http://www.pmean.com/04/OrdinalLogistic.html
Good luck with your work.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
2 answers
Hi,
I am currently doing a quantitative study (between-subjects design) to measure the degree to which alexithymia, emotional expressivity, mindfulness and coping strategies predict emotional eating, where emotional eating is the outcome variable and the rest are the predictor variables. The target population the study is done on is university students and black Asian or ethnic minority individuals (BAME). the measures i am using are: Toronto Alexithymia Scale; (c) Emotional Eating Scale; (d) the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; (e) Berkeley Expressivity Scale; and (f) the Brief Cope Scale. All of these are likert scales.
How do i work out the sample size and actual power in GPower analysis* programme. any attachments tutorials to help me would be appreciated
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Using G*Power to Determine Sample Size
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
5 answers
Hi, I have used the package pwr in R, but it falls short when compared with the GUI program G*Power (https://gpower.hhu.de/).
G*Power has a wealth of options and analyses but pwr is more basic.
Are there any other packages that incorporate all the features that G*Power has?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi I think depends of the type of problem analyzed. In addition to asypow, PwrGSD, palm, powerSurvEpi, powrpkg, powerGWASinteraction, pedantics, gap and size.fdr there are other packages as:
1) webpower: this package has functions to conduct power analysis for a variety of models
2) simglm: an special package to calculate the power through simulation.
3) SIMR, pamm, clusterPower, long power, nlmeU,simR : allows users to calculate power for generalized linear mixed effects models
4) Superpower: allos to calculate the power for Factorial ANOVA designs
I hope it helps!.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Greetings.
My study design is as below:
  • between subjects: 3 groups
  • within subjects: pre & post measurements (9 measurements each)
GPower computation details as below:
  • type: a priori
  • effect size, f = 0.25
  • alpha error = 0.05
  • power = 0.80
  • number of groups = 3
  • number of measurements = should it be 2, 9 or 18 ?
  • corr among rep measures = how to get this value? is it based on previous studies (if yes, kindly guide how)?
  • nonsphericity correction = should it be 1? how to determine this?
Kindly advise on the above to calculate the sample size eventually.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
To determine and estimate the sample for repeated-measures ANOVA, the researcher needs to know the means and standard deviations of the outcome at the different observations. The absolute differences between these values and their respective variances will provide an evidence-based measure of effect size.
The suggested steps for calculating sample size for a repeated-measures ANOVA in G*Power are below:
1. Open the G*Power.
2. Under the Test family drop-down menu: select F tests.
3. Under the Statistical test drop-down menu: select ANOVA: Repeated measures: within factors.
4. Under the Type of power analysis drop-down menu: select A priori: Compute required sample size - given alpha, power, and effect size.
5. Select the Determine button.
6. Select the Direct marker to highlight the menu.
7. In the Partial eta-squared box: insert one of the following values:
A. (.01) if the researcher believes there will be a small treatment effect.
B. (.03) if the researcher believes there will be a moderate treatment effect.
C. (.05) if the researcher believes there will be a large treatment effect.
8. Select Calculate.
9. Select Calculate and transfer to main window.
10. Insert .80 into the Power (1-beta err prob) box, unless researcher would like to change the power according to the current empirical or clinical context.
11. For the Number of groups box: insert (1)
12. For the Number of measurements box: insert the number that you have (3)
13. Select Calculate.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Say I'm using GPower to calculate the number of participants needed in a multiple regression to detect one of the predictor's unique effect. I want to be able to detect a correlation of .3. What you typically do is select:
- Test family: F tests
- Statistical test: Fixed model, R2 increase
- Type of power analysis: A priori (but I guess for my question, it really doesn't matter)
GPower ask for an effect size (f2), and has a tool to convert R2 to f2. In the toolbox, you can select a "Direct" input, which is partial R2. So from what I understand, GPower uses partial correlation has an input.
Is it strictly for partial correlation, or is it OK to use this for part correlation as well? I know both return the same p-value (it's just two different beta-to-correlation transformation), so I'm not even sure if it is relevant at all.
Thanks in advance for any insights on this question!
Relevant answer
Answer
I think Gpower needs a partial correlation specifically, but it will fit both a correlation and a partial correlation. For instance, the best scenario is partial correlation = correlation (other predictors have no effects), and the worst is partial correlation <= correlation (other predictors explain some variance, but the correlation is thus bigger than the partial). It both cases, you'll have the power to detect a partial correlation or correlation of at least .30.
If you use a part correlation instead, Gpower will overestimate the power of your analysis (because part correlation <= partial correlation), which may or may not be a good thing.
The real question is what is .30?
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
My study is purely on studying the effect of x on y, but I face difficulties in calculating the sample size of my social research using GPower. My question is which Test family and Statistical test should I use in Gpower.
P.S: I want to reject the null hypothesis and prove the alternative one (that there is an effect).
Relevant answer
Answer
First, from a logical point of view, you it is only possible to reject a null hypothesis; it is not possible to "prove" the alternative. What G*Power will do, within limits that you specify, is to determine what sample size it would take to eliminate the possibility that an effect was due to chance. But there are always other possible explanations, beyond just chance, and no one test can eliminate all those other possibilities.
Second, saying that you are "studying the effect of x on y" is relatively vague. If x and y are both continuous variables, then you are probably talking about a correlation. But if you are controlling for the effects of other variables, then you are probably talking about a regression coefficient.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
17 answers
Gpower requires that df numerators be specified - can anyone advise how to estimate these in order to determine sample size? Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are using a factorial ANCOVA (AxBxC) (i.e. 2x3x4 design):
Number of groups:
The "Number of Groups" on G*Power would be 24 (That is, all cells in your 2x3x4 design, thus 24 because there are 2*3*4 levels for Factor A, Factor B, and Factor C respectively- 2*3*4=24).
Numerator df:
The Numerator df would depend on what factor you are interested in. If you wanted to complete a power analysis for the main effect of A, the Numerator df would be 1 (Number of levels in Factor A - 1 : 2-1=1). For Factor B the numerator df would be 2 (3-1).
If you wanted to complete a power analysis for an interaction between Factor A and Factor B, the Numerator df would be (2-1)*(3-1)= 2 (You are effectively multiplying the main effect numerator dfs together). The Numerator df for the interaction between Factor B and C would be (3-1)*(4-1)= 6 . If you were interested in the interaction between all factors (A*B *C) the Numerator df would be (2-1)*(3-1)*(4-1)= 6.
Number of Covariates:
Here you would just enter the number of your covariates.
Hope this helps! This webpage is also really helpful: http://www.statpower.net/Content/312/Handout/gpower-tutorial.pdf
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
I am about to start a randomized controlled study consisted of 3 groups. I want to know how I can use Gpower software to calculate the appropriate sample size for this study?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Hisham,
The answer depends on:
1. What outcome(s) will be assessed (and how they are quantified); continuous scores would be analyzed differently from categorical (e.g., success/failure) variables.
2. How small a difference is worth detecting, if in fact it exists? (This is the target effect size.)
3. How much risk of being wrong are you willing to have? This concerns both the risk of a type I error (false rejection of a true null hypothesis, quantified as the alpha level), and the type II error risk (failing to reject a false null hypothesis, quantified as "beta," the complement of which is statistical power. e.g., power = 1 - beta).
As a simple example: In G*Power, a fixed-effects, one-way anova ("F tests" family), with a desired power of .90 or better, alpha of .05, target effect size (Cohen's f) of 0.25, and 3 groups would require 207 or more cases in all (69 per group).
If that seems too daunting, I am certain that your institution has a number of folks who can walk you through the process of selecting a suitable sample size for your research aims.
Good luck with your work.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
14 answers
You  know we have not any Identified method for sampling in SEM method,so can we use sampling software for example Gpower ,NCSS,IBM sample size for our sampling .if yes ,HOW ?
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm really happy to find this discussion. Thanks Jan for the excellent citations. As a quick update, the website shared by a few people ( http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=89 ) has been moved, but is still available and worth the visit ( https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89 ). In fact, I'd suggest just bookmarking the master page here https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/default.aspx .
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hello.
Recently I have become more familiar with determining à prior sample sizes, but mainly with T tests.
I will need to use those procedures for a F test (repeated mesures, within-between groups) and I am struggling a little. A couple questions that could help me:
1) In the typical "non-inferiority trial" is there a value of ES that is theorically atributed in this cases?
2) Yesterday I realized that Gpower has an calculator to help determine the ES. In the category "between groups" I could determine the ES to be 0.5
Under the same exact conditions, can I use that ES in "within-between" analysis or that would be an error?
The calculato for "between groups" allow to ES to be determined by means (that is fine with), while "within-between" requires variances and is beyond my stats skills. :)
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Jorge,
With respect to your questions:
1. See this link, especially p. 153: http://hjdbulletin.org/files/archive/pdfs/431.pdf
2. For any effect of interest (within factor, between factor, interaction of the two), the issue is always, what degree of difference is clinically/practically important to detect (if, in fact, it were to exist)? This is a judgment call. The default guidelines of G*Power for "small," "medium," and "large" effect sizes come from Jacob Cohen's text, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. However, Cohen would be the first to note that they do not substitute for context-specific information and understanding of the variables. So, professional judgment is called for.
3. It is always possible to run a quick pilot study, in order to determine what sort of effect sizes might accrue in a full study. As well, this will also give you some insight as to the correlation of scores across the repeated measures dimension, which is also needed for G*Power specifications involving a repeated measures factor.
Good luck with your work!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hi all,
In short, I am looking how to calculate the sample size based on a hierarchical regression.
Im conducting an experiment where I have 8 predictors in the main analysis. Step one includes 6 different scales (predictors) (IF) and step two includes two (CH).
I have two previous studies that have looked at the relationship between IF and the dependent variable, and three that have assessed CH and the dependent variable but none that have regressed both IF and CH on the DV. Also, the studies looking at IF and the DV have used less scales in their regression models than what I am using. I am therefore not sure if I can use effect sizes (f2 / R2 or F-value) reported by other studies since there are different amount of predictors? I was hence thinking of using the standardised coefficients (B) but.... how do I do that when I dont have B for all predictors? nor do I know how to combine all the coefficients to "one model" since it is a (hierarchical regression) in order to calculate sample size.
And yes, I know how to use all of the "typical" calculators, like, daniel sloper, GPower, Kelley & Maxwell etc.. Its the estimation and justification bit I struggle with.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you have multiple hypotheses to examine you have to consider what you want your study to be designed to do (e.g., find "significant effects" for some of these, all of them, one of them). For ANOVA we did this here (https://github.com/dbrookswr/powermh). A lot of the same issues will be relevant. As noted by the 0.1.1 number, the package is in draft and given current workload I am unlikely to update it or include regression with it for a long time). THe draft paper is on RG at
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
My topic is in the HR field and i've 5 IVs, 1 mediator and 1 Moderator variable. I'm using Smart PLS and i should use the G-power analysis for calculating the sample size, but honestly i don't know why specifically the G-power since there are other techniques for calculating the sample size? moreover if anyone could help me in understanding how to use it, because i watched lots of videos and they use different statistical tests and each test provide different sample size and i dunno on what base to choose in order to calculate the sample size needed.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
Dear All,
In my research I have 1IV,1DV and 1MV.
Indicator for IV -2 question, DV-9 questions and MV - 7 Questions.
Using G*power analysis, specifically for F-Test in Multiple Regression and PLS-SEM analysis, (effect size f² = 0.15 (medium); α = 0.05; power = 0.95; number of predictor = _).
1.How I should determine number of predictor?
2. It is number of predictor is number of IV in study?
Kindly assist me.
Thanks In advance.
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I am trying to compute the required sample size for my experiment. I have already conducted a similar experiment before, and I used a PAIRED-SAMPLES t-test to test the difference between mean 1 and 2. This time, the logic behind the experiment is similar, but I will be using an INDEPENDENT-SAMPLES t-test.
My question is: when I try to workout the required sample size on gpower, do I select paired-sample t-test and input all of the required information, get my required sample size and then say I'll need to use this number of people for the independent-samples t-test?
In other words - can I use data from a paired-samples t-test to workout the required sample size for an independent-samples t-test?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Agree with David! In most cases, you will need more participants to find an effect of the same size for independent groups than for a dependent sample. Reason is the smaller unsystematic variance in paired samples, because the difference between participants is removed from analysis.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
2 answers
I have applied hierarchical cluster analysis with three variables (stress, constrained commitment and overtraining) in a sample of 45 burned out athletes. While examining the minimum sample size requirements, I found out that there is no specific power analysis for that (?). Thus, I applied the rule of thumb: 5*m2 (m=number of variables). Is statsoft or Gpower programs or any else program suitable to examine sample size requirements for applying hierarchical cluster analysis?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Alex,
The short answer is, there is no suitable power analysis for hierarchical clustering methods, because very few agree on what might be a suitable significance test for the process. The matter of how many clusters to derive is a judgment call far more than it is a well-established statistical test (though there are naysayers; for example, those who tout the cubic clustering criterion in SAS as an unerring indicator). As well, there is no way to know in advance how much or how little variation will exist in a data set, for the measures you have chosen.
More cases is generally better than fewer cases, but that's pretty vague! So, you tend to see guidelines like the one you mention (5m-squared) instead. You could cover your bases by having multiple samples to see how consistent the solution appears across samples.
Good luck with your work!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
6 answers
I need to know is there is a minimun number of subject to run a cluster analysis. My sample has 546 subjects, y I have two test of five factors each one. A revierw ask me why I think that this number is enough, it would be better if I can do it quoting some research.
Relevant answer
Answer
One option for you would be conducting a preliminary analysis to derive the recommended number of clusters and the best clustering method, given your sample and variables. You need to check some specific indices accounting for internal and stability validation, I usually do this in R using two packages: clValid and RankAggreg.
In any case, 546 subjects are more than enough for a cluster analysis, so there is nothing to worry for in respect to the size of the sample! Just ground the number of clusters and check for their stability (usually, for this step I use the fpc package in R, and bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions) and the reviewer will be fine with your work.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
5 answers
Hello
I currently have two dependent variables (with 4 measurements each) and two independent variables
My question is how to calculate the sample size using Gpower for multivariate multiple regression. since we only have multiple linear regression in Gpower
what statistical test to use? (t-test? F-test?)
otherwise is there another toll to do the calculations?
Thank you
Relevant answer
Dear Hajar deqqaq ,
The choice depends on the purpose of your multiple linear regression test. The t-test family for linear regression involves a bivariate model (one dependent, one independent) to assess either size of slope if there is one group or if there is more than one group to assess differeces in intercepts or slopes of the regression per group. On the other hand, if you have n>1 predictor and a dependent variable, you would estimate sample size using an F-test, where the effect size would be aimed at increases in R2 or R2 deviation from zero. Based on the information you provided I would estimate it using an F-test for R2 deviation from zero.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Dear Researchers,
I am currently wondering how to calculate the required sample size for my study.
I have the following study design:
- 1 Independent variable (metric)
- 3 Dependent variables (metric).
I want to test, weither the IV has an effect on the 3 DVs. Therefore, I need to do a multivariate regression analysis (as far as I know).
For the sample size calculation I planned to use GPower, which however does not provide the test of multivariate regression. Does anybody has experience with sample size calculation for multivariate regression models?
Would be really helpful!
Thanks in advance, Lissy
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks to all of you for your quick response and helpful answers! :)
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
4 answers
Hi,
I'm trying to perform a post-hoc power analysis for a multinomial logistic regression with interaction terms, and I couldn't find any reference for it. The nearest answer was in the GPower manual, but it is made for binomial logistic regression and does not mention any information about how to handle the interaction terms.
Thanks in advance,
Relevant answer
Answer
An elegant way would be to write a small Monte Carlo simulation program, i.e. plug in your estimated parameters in the linear model that you desire (with the interaction terms) and interatively re-estimated the multinomial logistic model with the given sample size (apporx. 10,000 iterations). For each iteration, determine whether your parameter was below alpha, i.e. significant result. Dividing the the total number of significant results by the total number of iterations will yield the power of the test.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
6 answers
For a correlational study, I conducted an a priori power analysis based on a previous experiment with similar measures. Given this I was able to estimate my sample size, and went using that.
However, when submitting the paper, a reviewer mentioned that the sample was too sample for yielding stable estimates and cited Lakens & Evers, (2014).
I read recently (while not well explained) that you can also conduct/report a post hoc sensitivity power analysis to corroborate a significant finding in a correlation analysis. (using gpower)
Is this correct? Can someone elaborate on how to report this in APA format, and what I can actually say. The analysis does show that my r value is higher than the critical threshold for 80% power at .05.
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Mircea,
Did you mean to say that the reviewer suggested that your sample size was too small? If so, the appropriate response is that your method section should have outlined the a priori power analysis you ran, and use that as justification for the sample size (assuming that your target effect size--ES--was chosen with a suitable rationale).
Post hoc power analysis (that is, asking the question, "For the effect size I observed in my data set, how powerful would such a study be with the same sample size, same alpha level, same number of variables, to detect such an effect size in the population, should it exist?") is only useful to the extent that you consider the observed ES to be a suitable target ES. But, your a priori analysis should have addressed that point in the first place--what ES is a suitable target in the context of the study you executed. As well, the observed ES is a random variable, and highly unlikely to coincide with the population ES.
For more emphatic dismissals of post hoc power analysis, take a look at these articles:
Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2012). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistican, 55, 19-24. doi:10.1198/000313001300339897
Levine, M., & Ensom, M. H. H. (2012). Post hoc power analysis: An idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy, 21, 405-409. doi:
10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503
O'Keefe, D. J. (2007). Brief report: Post hoc power, observed power, a priori power, retrospective power, prospective power, achieved power: Sorting out appropriate uses of statistical power analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 291-299. doi:10.1080/19312450701641375
Good luck with your revision!
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Study 1: A developmental psychologist wants to examine differences in nightly sleep duration among easy, moderate and difficult infants. he knows that the effect size f would be 22, and he wants to reach 80% power with error probability of .05.
Study 2: A psychologist wants to examine the association between self esteem and life satisfaction, using rosenberg self esteem scale and satisfaction with life scale. She knows that the correlation p H1 would be approximately .30(correlation p H0 would be 0), and she wants to reach 95% power with an error probability of .001.
Study 3: A relationship scientist examined the difference in psychological well-being between married individuals and single individuals. He collected data from 160 people(80 married, 80 single). The first group’s well being average was 4.27 and SD was 1.3. He wants to know what his achieved power is.
I haven't ever used Gpower, these are example studies and I just want to know the right way to use Gpower and answers to these would be of big help. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
G*Power is easy to use if you know what power is, and I agree you should use the manual. As you work through your problems, be sure to check your assumptions carefully. With an effect size f of 22 it is impossible to get a power as low as .8, because you have to have at least 2 in a group and the power with a total of 6 subjects is 1.0. Surely your effect size is wrong.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
14 answers
Can anyone please advised me on calculating sample size using Gpower? I want to see the effect of an intervention( independent variable: 2groups) on mental health (continuous) of participants and I have considered baseline outcome measure as a covariate? How can I calculate the sample size in this case? Furthermore, my two secondary outcomes (both are in continuous scale) are also affected by intervention according to the previous literature. In such case, do I have to consider them as a covariate? I am confused on numerator df and don't know what to put in both of these instances?
Relevant answer
Answer
The way I try to remeber this is to think of the denominator as the size of the cake and the numerator as the topping. The size is a matter of hard work, the topping is the design of the analysis. If you have two conditions and three diagnostic groups and would like to test the interaction of intervention by diagnosis with baseline-scores as co-variate, then in Gpower you get Numerator df= (2-1)*(3-1)=2, Number of groups=6, Number of covariates=1. With power .80 and alpha .05 and an expected effect of medium size you would need a total sample size of 128.
I don't see why you would include other secondary outcomes in this analysis if these outcomes are not correlated with your primary outcome. In another time and place you could have conducted seperate studies for your outcomes.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
Hi,
We're looking at the frequencies, forms, and functions of adjectives found in child directed speech in different types of corpora e.g. shared book reading and toy play. We'd like to conduct a power analysis to find out the minimum of data points required. I've previously used GPower to calculate sample sizes required to detect a particular effect size for experimental data, but I'm unsure about how to do this for corpus data, given that we're more interested in data points required rather than number of participants.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
Jamie
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi.
I am not sure if this is what you are looking for but I know Raven's Eye uses corpi for their analytics. I know they have 65 different language corpus. I do not know if they have corpi built with child directed speech. Maybe check out their website.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
1 answer
If I use the GPower 3.0 to determine the sutable size of Sample to SEM . Variables are (4 independent and 2 mediators and one dependant variable ) then the number of factors should I put in the programe should be 4 Or 6?   
thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Keep in mind that programs like G*Power provide an estimate of the required sample size. The estimate is only as good as the values that you put into the program. So Bob ran an experiment in 1973 with five replicates. I now use Bob's results for mean and standard deviation to enter into G*Power. The first question you should ask is how accurate is an estimate of the mean and standard deviation based on a sample size of five?
The estimate is a lower bound. It will seldom be THE right answer.
When in doubt, go for more samples. It is easier to argue that a statistically significant effect is too small to be relevant than it is to argue that "this" important treatment effect would have been significant had I taken more samples.
No matter what G*Power states, always look at the literature. If G*Power indicates that you need a sample size of 8, but all the equivalent literature reports experiments with sample sizes ranging from 12 to 75, then you will be in trouble using a sample size of 8. Be careful using a smaller sample size if G*Power indicates a sample size of 200 but the literature reports experiments that have sample sizes of 12 to 75.
With your experiment there are three potential outcomes.
1) Your results agree with the published literature.
2) Your results do not refute the published literature, but they also do not support it.
3) Your results contradict published findings.
In case #1, you are fine so long as you use a sample size that is no smaller than the smallest sample size in the most recent decade of published literature.
In case #2, it will be difficult to publish, though more journals are interested in inconclusive results so long as the methods are good. If you have average or above average replication, this might work.
In case #3, you need some reason to convince others that you did not make a mistake. This will be very difficult if your sample size is small because it is easy to reject a manuscript with a substandard sample size.
A part of planning sample sizes is risk management. What is the chance that you will discover something new that will contradict current paradigms? What risk are you willing to take that the faculty member next door will run a similar study with twice your replication and find contradictory outcomes? What risk are you willing to take to have inconclusive results? All of these issues are mitigated by having a larger sample sizes. Obviously this must be balanced with the cost and time involved with gathering more data.
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
3 answers
Can we determine the appropriate sample size for logistic regression using GPower even before we start to collect the data? If yes, how can we set the odd ratios (illustration in the figure)
Relevant answer
Answer
@Merce Ovejero..
thank you for the help Dear Merce. Did you mean that I should use the odd ratios from other research with similar topic/model as mine? I am little bit confuse ho to set the odd ratios. Is there any rule of thumb that was commonly used derived from such a statistical book?
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
5 answers
Im trying to determine apriori my ideal sample size using the software G*Power. The model which I`m going to test is a moderation. Most of all I dont't understand what to do with the effectsizes. There are two effectsizes: one of my Regressor and one of my Moderator. Though there is only one area in G*Power in which I can add only one number.
Maybe there is somebody who worked with G*Power before and can help me with this?
Relevant answer
Answer
That sounds like you want to use estimates of the nostalgia and salience from separate studies to make a prediction about the effect size of the interaction, which you would like to evaluate with your study.
Unfortunately that is not possible. Main Effects do not contain information about interactions by definition.
Your power analysis in gpower should be based on t-tests, linear bivariate regression, difference between slopes. I would advise to derive from your subject matter knowledge, which is the minimal difference in slopes that would be of interest, and use this for the Analysis.
If you have a simple effecs analysis in mind to evalualte the moderation (aka pick a point approach) I think it would not be possible in gpower.
hope this helps :)
  • asked a question related to GPower
Question
2 answers
I would like check the association BP response and few SNPs from a longitudinal study. I would like to which test is suitable to calculate the same in GPower software?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for the paper Dr. Ali! Appreciate it!