Science topic
Foresight - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Foresight, and find Foresight experts.
Questions related to Foresight
Dear ResearchGate community,
I am runing a special issue "“Transforming Education in the 21st Century: Foresight and Sustainable Development”" in Scimago/Scopus Q1 indexed journal i.e., "Foresight and STI Governance".
Please read call for paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hglOiBmykoagYozdEpct-28nxkVZbNJA/edit?tab=t.0
If anyone is interested, then feel free to contact me via email.
Kind regards,
Asad Abbas
Hi everyone! I am doing a thesis in the field of project management focusing on the relevance of foresight. I have attached a short questionnaire, I would be grateful if you could fill it out. Thanks in advance to everyone for the help.
I would like to work on a research idea after I get my PhD in Economic Analysis and Foresight.
Is foresight the defining component of futures thinking?
How to combine design thinking and foresight for innovation?
How can I find general scenarios (drivers with uncertainty) of artificial intelligence in the world, as well as scenarios of artificial intelligence in America, China and Russia?
Transhumanists and visionaries like Ray Kurzweil1 have been talking about the future technological advancements that will speed up and reach a point he calls the singularity (also a title of one of his books)2. Kurzweil has been successfully predicting milestones in technological innovation for decades—not through some psychic abilities but through analyzing trends and applying foresight. He talks about a point, not so far away in the future where we would have machines and networks so powerful (together with machine-to-brain interfaces)3, that we would be able to upload our brain to the network (or whatever form our present-day internet would be at the time) and live disembodied or take any embodiment we like.
Although I do not doubt Kurzweil’s predictive and analytical skills, when it comes to mind and consciousness it is very risky to make such sweeping statements since, after all, we know so little as to what the mind is. Once again people like Kurzweil are assuming that the mind is in the brain (and subsequently the brain is one-and-the-same with the mind) so if you reverse-engineer and ‘copy’ a whole-brain you would have copied a mind.
What's your opinion?
Selected References to start this Discussion:
- Raymond Kurzweil is an American inventor and futurist. He is involved in fields such as optical character recognition (OCR), text-to-speech synthesis, speech recognition technology, and electronic keyboard instruments. He has written books on health, artificial intelligence (AI), transhumanism, technological singularity, and futurism. Kurzweil is a public advocate for the futurist and transhumanist movements and gives public talks to share his optimistic outlook on life extension technologies and the future of nanotechnology, robotics, and biotechnology. Kurzweil received the 1999 National Medal of Technology and Innovation, the United States' highest honor in technology, from President Clinton in a White House ceremony. He was the recipient of the $500,000 Lemelson-MIT Prize in 2001. He was elected a member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2001 for the application of technology to improve human-machine communication. In 2002 he was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame, established by the U.S. Patent Office. He has received 21 honorary doctorates, and honors from three U.S. presidents. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) included Kurzweil as one of 16 "revolutionaries who made America" along with other inventors of the past two centuries.
- The Singularity Is Near, published in 2005, was made into a movie starring Pauley Perrette from NCIS. In February 2007, Ptolemaic Productions acquired the rights to The Singularity Is Near, The Age of Spiritual Machines, and Fantastic Voyage, including the rights to film Kurzweil's life and ideas for the documentary film Transcendent Man, which was directed by Barry Ptolemy.
- Kurzweil's book How to Create a Mind was released on Nov. 13, 2012. In it, Kurzweil describes his Pattern Recognition Theory of Mind, the theory that the neocortex is a hierarchical system of pattern recognizers, and argues that emulating this architecture in machines could lead to an artificial superintelligence.
I am a beginner in the study of futurology. I am interested in which state education systems, universities or lower levels of education do you know that use futures studies?
They can be current projects or results of application of the methodology of scenarios or Delphi method.
The introduction of smart foresight in the decision making process opens new possibilities for the decision making centers by upgrading aspects such as transparency, flexibility, risk aversion,, rate of adoption in both private and public sector, etc. Please comment
The use of terms such as “foresight”, “strategic foresight” and “corporate foresight” has been growing quickly lately. The growth of this theme is associated with the reality of disruptive transformations to which organizations are inserted, generating the need to anticipate the opportunities and threats arising from this new scenario. This practice was structured to generate knowledge that should assist senior executives in making decisions about the future of their organizations.
Considering brazilian scenario, it has been a challenge to identify and observe companies that are working to develop this concept and turn it into practice.
Are companies abroad incorporating foresight into their processes?
- How?
- What are the first steps?
- Who should be the main sponsors?
- Any tips? :)
If not forecasting, would you replace the forecast with a foresight prediction method?
We are entering the new year 2022 and it is at the turn of the year that many macroeconomic and microeconomic forecasts for individual markets and industries appear. On the other hand, companies listed on the stock exchange are happy to boast of their potential to create value in the first quarter of the year, present attractive forecasts of increasing sales, acquiring new customers and profits in the markets ... to tempt new investors into shares. Is it not sometimes as Peter Drucker stated years ago?
„The best way to predict the future is to create it.”
“Time is the scarcest resource. Unless it is managed, nothing else can be managed.”
What do you think about forecasting and planning the future?
I've added some inspirational leads
We foresighted that the Coronavirus (COVID-19 Pandemic) would bring new Opportunities for a Better World .. Now approximately 9 months since we published our paper and one since the outbreak of the virus. Do you believe the world hase managed to re-discover itself.. or did we discover new opportunities? Appreciate your feedback.
Here is the baseline paper
What do we know about corporate foresight implementation in the international business domain? Is it enough? Yes, we understand that MNCs, which coincidently are an important unit of analysis in international business studies, are the most rigorous adopters of foresight and scenario planning in the business administration field. Many cases and studies soundly support this statement. Yet, the international business theory remains reluctant regarding this phenomenon in general. The place, role, distinctive features of corporate foresight implementation in the international business managerial domain remains an undiscovered mystery. Isn't it a time to break the silence?
In his important poem “Little Gidding”, T.S.Elliot makes the soul of a dead man say of his and by implication all our lives:
Since our concern was speech, and speech impelled us
To purify the dialect of the tribe
And urge the mind to aftersight and foresight,
….
DOES human speech “urge the mind to aftersight and foresight”?
If so, that seems to me very important!
I am developing an analysis on the different ways of approaching foresight in the field of social sciences
In the learning process emerged a number of schools of learning and the most famous behavioral school and the school of police learning and the school of learning by foresight
Dear WIND power Experts,
the Joint Research Centre is opening up a consultation in order to identify which are the most innovative technologies in the WIND power sector.
The ideal technologies we are interested in have the following characteristics:
• To be a radically new technology/concept, not achievable by incremental research. .
• To be in an early stage of development: Technology Readiness Level (TRL) possibly not more than 3
Thank you very much!
Alberto Moro
I am looking at non-corporate ways of conducting foresight studies.
There are more than 40 applicable methods applying in futures studies and foresight practices globally. Those methods are developed and classified by several researchers. If we assume a brand new method in futures studies is emerging, what you think about its necessary characteristics? Is there any dark area in "futures studies" which a new scientific method could discuss?
Obviously, the new method should consider the basic fundamental axes of a scientific method like reliability, stability, and validity; but do you recognize any gaps which futures studies' community might help through providing and introducing a new scientific method?
In the context of the Low Carbon Energy Observatory of the Joint Research Centre we are opening up a consultation in order to identify which are the more promising emerging solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies.
(How to define emerging solar PV technologies? These are technologies still far away from the maturity, with a TRL of 1-4, still researched at the university level, rather than in big companies.)
I would like to have your views on what you consider the most interesting emerging solar PV technologies, in the medium-long term.
We are looking for specific methods (like bibliographic analysis of patents) to find out quantitative informations for the relationship between several technologies (or technology pairs).
Please guide me and provide me some references .
Can the results of foresight be called evidence? In other words, can the result of a foresight research serve as evidence that is used in policy-making?
Is it correct to use the term evidence for results of foresight researches?