Ethics - Science topic

In my opinion, the online way.

Isn't non-belief better? Sometimes yes, sometimes no.

Editors and reviewers are no better, and spew vitriol on newer vistas that hold fear and canonical antagonism.

Self-singeing criticism and self-correction is unknown to the human species. We borrow oxygen and water from NATURE to survive. Where is the scope for self-narcissim.

RG was requested / instructed by BMJ to not allow me to upload my article on this issue.

The internationalisation of higher education has marked a significant shift in the linguistic landscape of universities worldwide, with English emerging as the lingua franca in the academic domain, even in countries where it is not the majority language.

As part of the push to attract international students and rise in global university rankings, there has been an increased focus among universities both in Anglophone and non-Anglophone contexts on establishing English-medium instruction programmes and courses, especially in the fields of business, science and technology...

Furthermore, initiating a university-wide dialogue on translanguaging can serve as a catalyst for the entire university community to embrace the linguistic and cultural diversity of its student body. In conclusion, as universities engage in internationalisation efforts, it is vital to ensure that ‘international’ does not become synonymous with ‘English-only’. Rather, a primary goal of internationalisation should be to establish inclusive and equitable universities where students’ multilingualism is welcomed, valued and deeply integrated into every facet of the learning environment and experience...

Good question

Dear Bayon,

Using the Defining Issues Test (DIT, DIT2, bDIT) could be a good choice. (Source: https://ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu/)

Sincerely,

Tzu-Hsiang Peng

We need to immediately utilize a problem- solving framework for HEIs. This approach is very relevant for:

a. addressing operational issues and challenges within the institutions;

b. addressing and resolving developmental challenges;

c. aligning and realigning operational=developmental initiatives;

d. improving curriculum across all disciplines;

d. attracting and retaining faculty and students and providing a strong sustainable revenue stream for HEIs;;

e. ensuring workplace relevance graduate employability.

If you are aware of a university that needs this type of assistance, I might be willing to serve on contract.

In my opinion, the relevance is to exist a validity of the general ethical principles.

i don't think that is feasible... regulations would not allow it..

A systematic review article might not require ethics clearance since you are only selecting published articles (which already obtained ethics approval) and you are not directly processing any personal data. On the contrary, if you indeed use patients' data on your own, then you need to have ERB approval. If you are processing data in the EU, or conducting a study targeting EU patients in collaboration with an EU university, you need to comply with GDPR.

Full Paper Deadline has been extended till September 18th for anyone interested in sharing their work at this collaborative conference!

Assuming that we are talking about robots as they exist right now, and not the hypothetical ones in the future, there are some concerns that the robots could infringe on our privacy and other rights. In this case, since they are still blind machines, their abilities to connect with other devices need to be subject to our approval and consent. They cannot simply monitor our surroundings and send the signals to their manufacturers or other parties.

As for the ability to mimic human movement and facial expressions, I don't have any serious objections. Right now everybody can immediately tell who is a human and who is the robot. So the problem is not a serious one right now.

Aristotle noted that one of the flaws of democratic culture was that when people find themselves politically "equal" they go on to imagine they are (or should be) "equal" in all respects.

The move toward a general equality in all things plays out in every democratic social atmosphere. And, it can be taken to absurd extremes. In the search for limitless equality, not only are men "felt" to be equal to women, or blacks to whites, but animals to humans, and even inanimate objects with living things. So now we hear talk of saving "the planet."

Ethical research on animals eventually boils down to the extent of our anthropomorphic projections of human worth and human feelings onto other creatures. And, to put it bluntly, how queasy we become when inflicting pain or death on other creatures.

Is this a social question? Do we raise our hands and let a majority decide if it is right to eat meat or raise chickens in tiny cages? Or, do we let individuals each make their own decisions in such matters?

Questions like this, presuppose that there is a "right answer" that should be accepted by all.

As we move toward a greater socialization in everything, and continue the ongoing limitation of individual choice and ability to vary from the standards of the group, some room should be left over for the minority of animal trainers, animal researchers, animal hunters, and the eaters of animals, who might disagree with whatever conclusions a majority of people might come to concerning this issue.

And we should keep in mind that all "ethics" are, in the end, ethics decided by humans for humans. And what makes something ethical, is that is benefits mankind. When we slap and kill the mosquito that is drinking our blood, the inequality between the life of the animal and the life of the person becomes clear.

Stanley Wilkin In my view, Yes, religion is dangerous when it is misused politically by authoritarian leaders/politicians to oppress their own people . . .

John, the environmental problem is a global problem regardless of local roles/contributions like China or Canada or the USA or the EU.

Had at least the western world gone green in 2012 and set up green markets and China and India and Russia and other countries were out of green markets, then perfect green market theory suggest that you can put a cost on importing non-green goods and services so green markets could have been used to push China to go green markets or lose the western markets. Had the EU together with the rest of the western world gone green markets, the energy impact of the war in Ukriene on EU countries would have been small as they would have gone out of non-renewable to produce at the lowest green market price possible and hence they would not have provided money to Russia for buying non-renewable energy to amass a stronger military....

Just a Covid brough countries to their knees because it affected the survival of the supply side of the market/THE RICH without the possibility of decoupling from the health threat, then when the environmental crisis becomes binding and threaten the survival of the supply side of the market/THE RICH without a decoupling possibility from the binding environmental threat, then they move towards green markets as a way to save the survival of capitalism as green capitalism as countries again will be on their knees.

Thanks again for taking the time to comment. It is nice to see that I am not the only once who sees and talks about these a kind of antisciency acts, academic tunneling and willful academic blindness.

Deployment of humanoid robots can increase social inequalities and disparities in education, healthcare, employment, etc.

Vey interesting articla on this topic '"Regulation and Entrainment in Human-Robot Interaction' Dr. Cynthia Breazeal MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab

Warning: blatant self promotion in this answer.

Some old, but hopefully helpful, references relevant to these questions...

Wallach, Wendell, and Colin Allen. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Grodzinsky, Frances S., Keith W. Miller, and Marty J. Wolf. "The ethics of designing artificial agents." Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2008): 115-121.

Johnson, Deborah G., and Keith W. Miller. "Un-making artificial moral agents." Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2008): 123-133.

Miller, Keith W. "It's not nice to fool humans." IT professional 12.1 (2010): 51-52.

Bryson, Joanna J. "Robots should be slaves." Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues 8 (2010): 63-74.

Grodzinsky, Frances S., Keith W. Miller, and Marty J. Wolf. "Developing artificial agents worthy of trust:“Would you buy a used car from this artificial agent?”." Ethics and information technology 13 (2011): 17-27.

Miller, Keith, Marty J. Wolf, and Frances Grodzinsky. "Behind the mask: Machine morality." Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 27.1 (2015): 99-107.

Wolf, Marty J., K. Miller, and Frances S. Grodzinsky. "Why we should have seen that coming: comments on Microsoft's tay" experiment," and wider implications." Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47.3 (2017): 54-64.

You should focus on articles that have the same topic as yours and have many quotes on them. That magazine that was published in a researcher is the best for your topic.

Ioana Maria Cortea

Un saludo las teorías éticas a través de la ética normativa tendrá en cuenta los valores morales que orientan el hacer y toma de decisiones y ayudan a distinguir lo bueno o lo malo de la acción moral. La ética aplicada estudia la aplicación de la teoria ética y estarán en relación a dos condiciones; cuestiones morales y lo que genere controversia.

La teoria ética del Principalísimo será la base fortalecida por la teoria ética de la virtud, la Deontología, el Consecuencialismo, el utilitarismo y la Casuística. Todo esto dependiendo del contenido de cada articulo su alcance y su fundamentación científica para un análisis ético o su fundamentación ética para un análisis científico..

Yes, there can be ethical distinctions between utilizing AI to provide answers and embarking on a mission to reach Mars with the assistance of rockets. These distinctions arise from the different contexts, potential consequences, and considerations involved in each scenario.

Both scenarios involve ethical considerations, but they differ in their scope, potential consequences, and long-term implications. The ethics of AI usage and space exploration should be approached thoughtfully, considering the broader impacts on individuals, society, and the environment.

Thanks very kindly Nicco for your comprehensive and thoughtful response. By highlighting the extension of knowledge the process makes more sense to me now, in terms of ethics and rigor

I think that AI is a good servant but should never be a master.

I have maybe watched too many Sci-Fi films, but I wonder if AI ever will become too powerful. I sincerely hope it never will be.

But it can be a marvellous aid to people who have lost bodily functions. But again, still a good servant to enable them to increase their independence.

In the realm of AI and warfare, risks abound, lurking like shadows in the digital realm. With the integration of artificial intelligence, the potential dangers escalate, leading to unforeseen consequences. Some perils include:

1. Autonomous weapons: AI-powered weaponry could act independently, escalating conflicts beyond human control.

2. Unintended consequences: Complex algorithms may result in unintended actions with severe repercussions.

3. Cyberattacks: AI can be manipulated for devastating cyber warfare, breaching defenses and wreaking havoc.

4. Lack of empathy: Machines lack human understanding, leading to ruthless decisions without compassion.

5. Proliferation: Widespread AI adoption might spark an arms race, endangering global stability.

As we navigate this treacherous terrain, vigilance and ethical considerations are paramount.

Recommended.

Dear doctor

Go To

Between fact and fiction: demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books

Dr Felicity Mellor

Author copy. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Social Studies of Science 33:4 (August 2003) 509-538 by SAGE Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.

"Conclusion Individual authors may have many reasons for wanting to write popular science. They may be research scientists with a genuine desire to explain their science to non-scientists, or they may have very little direct experience of science and be motivated solely by the need to make some money. But such issues are largely invisible to the readers of popular science. What public audiences are faced with are the books themselves (should they actually read them) and the web of other media texts nucleated around the books. It is therefore to the texts and their intertextuality that we must look to find the meaning of popularisations of science. In terms of genre expectations, the form of popularisation most closely identified with both science and scientists is the expository book. Expository popular science books provide a non-controversial forum in which public images of science are constructed and maintained. Drawing on the pedagogic orientation of the PUS movement, such books appear to challenge the boundaries demarcating science from other cultural activities by giving their readers an opportunity to learn more about science. They claim to explain science in clear, ‘accessible’ terms whilst at the same time making it culturally relevant and widely available. Yet such a manoeuvre is predicated on the assumption that ‘real’ science – the unmediated science that popularisers claim to re-present – is isolated from, and inaccessible to, public audiences. The rhetoric of accessibility, and of the PUS movement more generally, serves to cover over the ways in which popular science texts promote the interests of scientists by reinforcing their epistemic authority. The set of texts discussed in this article, like many other popularisations, explicitly concern the boundary between science and fiction. However, they also make repeated references to other ways of knowing. A complex picture thus emerges of engagement at multiple boundaries. For instance, working at both the science/fiction and science/technology boundaries enables the past successes and cultural solidity of technology to be claimed for physics even whilst the negative connotations of modern technologies are rejected. Similarly, comparing ‘bad’ science fiction to ‘meaningless’ magic enables magic to be denigrated even as physics itself is claimed as magical. Through this multiple boundary work science is constructed as mysterious, imaginative and intellectual – a transcendental means to ‘truth’ – at the same time as it is presented as factual, practical and a part of everyday culture. The routine nature of the boundary work further enables potential inconsistencies to be managed by avoiding the dichotomising tendencies of news-situated controversies of science. Rather than needing to fix a boundary and take up position on one side, popularisers engaged in routine boundary work can treat boundaries flexibly even within a single text. Thus boundaries can be breached even as they are reinforced. The exposition of science through science fiction breaches the science/fiction boundary and finds common ground in the role of the imagination; yet at the same time, the positioning of science beside science fiction highlights the factual paucity of the latter and so reinforces the boundary between the two. Similarly, popularisations which find common ground between science and religion appropriate features of religious thought for science and in so doing leave religion a diminished realm, just as do those popularisations which explicitly reinforce the science/religion boundary. Although the popularisations studied here accomplish much of their boundary work through science fiction, their engagement at other boundaries means that they have much in common with other popularisations of physics. Woven among the expositions and explanations of most popularisations are references to other ways of knowing, especially religion, which define the ‘other’ against which science should be compared. When Stephen Hawking concludes A Brief History of Time by claiming that a unified theory of physics will lead us to ‘know the mind of God’, he appropriates God for physics and claims a universal and future role for science (Hawking, 1988: 193). The voice of the theologian or religious devotee is silenced as the voice of the physicist is promoted. Claiming a future role for science is as much a part of the boundary work of popular physics books as is demarcating science from the other cultural spaces of the moment. Cartographic metaphors for boundary work are therefore limited and need to be complemented by alternative analytical metaphors. In this respect, popular science books are like family trees, tracing out the ancestors of the family of science in order to establish both its social status and its extended presence over time. Like the ever-increasing spread of the family tree, the temporal boundary work of popular physics books projects forwards into a future of continued growth, status and authority. Expository popularisations of physics can be seen as examples of routine boundary work embedded in an intertextual web spanning the mass media. Rather than part of any debate about science, they are celebrations of science. The boundary work they produce is highly complex and by working a number of boundaries in a non-controversial context, authors are able to claim for physics potentially contradictory features. A major accomplishment of this boundary work is to present physics as imaginative, futureoriented and integrated within the wider culture even whilst the public inaccessibility of physics is reinforced. In so doing, popular physics books maintain and augment the social status and epistemic authority of physics and claim for the subject both a past and a future of continued success."

Interesting! What research, which population?

The EU AI Act is the first legislation proposed to regulate the use of AI based on the risk posed by different AI systems (such as automated social scoring, which will be banned). The EU Parliament has proposed including providers of foundation models, including generative AI, in the scope of the legislation and requiring them to disclose training data...

You write it into their basic algorithms. Data governance software could be used to provide a backup ethics system, creating "laws" that can't be crossed.

This is a wrongly construed.

You imply consciousness is self-awareness. We have found that this is not the case. The intentionality agency is the source of consciousness but it does not need to have self-awareness.

Second, what "AI" do you mean? If you assume weak AI like software ChatGPT, DeepMInd or any other weak AI based on learning then the answer is no. This is because the quantification methods, e.g., Bayesian approximation and ensemble learning techniques (see, e.g., Abdar et al., 2021), are measured as probabilities.

Finally, artificial consciousness is not a software problem but based on energy. So DeepMind and Google unfortunately cannot solve this problem.

They can try mimicry but as you are aware real understanding is not 10% but 100% so functionalist or functional understanding running in software fails.

Jaime F Cárdenas-García

I like the idea!

Yes, I agree. It’s pretty obvious when you have an AI generated answer. I just ignore those posts. You have to wonder what people gain from pretending they know the answer to a question, when it is evident that they don’t. I want to hear from someone with actual experience, which often has a depth to it that AI completely misses.

In my opinion, that role in the relations between the men.

When using image classification models in real-world applications, several ethical considerations arise. Here are some of the key ethical considerations:

This is a common issue in research, and it can be challenging to address. While citation guides typically assume that researchers document their sources contemporaneously, some citation styles do allow for indirect citations or "citing a source within a source."

One possible approach would be to acknowledge that the idea is not originally yours, explain your recollection of how you first encountered it, and give credit to the sources you do remember. For example, you could use a phrase like "As I recall hearing from a conversation at a conference several years ago..." and then provide as much detail as you can about the setting or context.

Another option would be to reach out to colleagues or professional networks to see if anyone remembers the presentation or conversation you're referring to. There may be a chance that someone else recalls the origin of the idea, and can provide additional context or resources to build on.

Regardless of the approach you take, it's important to give credit where credit is due and make an effort to be transparent about the sources of your ideas. This builds credibility and trust within the academic community, and also helps to ensure that ideas are accurately attributed and can be further developed.

Accountability and a demarcation between public and private Morals

Exploring ethical considerations in AI for regulatory compliance involves addressing key challenges to ensure responsible and ethical AI practices. Here are some key challenges and suggested approaches to address them responsibly:

Hi Charlotte. Have you considered WeTransfer for this? If you get a premium account they should be able to send large videos to you or folders or videos and they can also add a comment at the same time. It should also be private only to you.

Best wishes, Kris

Wim Kaijser – absence is sometimes the key feature of the data! The famous case is the case of the analysis of bullet holes in US bombers in world war two. They mapped all holes so that they could reinforce the aircraft's armour where they were most likely to be hit. But before they could do this, the statistician Abraham Wald pointed out that these were the bombers that made it back to base! It was the areas in which there were no bullet holes that were important. Areas like cockpit, tail assembly, engines and fuel tanks didn't appear on the chart because these aircraft had been shot down. What they had was a shining example of survivor bias!

Full story here https://www.trevorbragdon.com/when-data-gives-the-wrong-solution/. I've uploaded the diagram which, bizarrely, shows a british Handley-Page Halifax rather than a B-26, which leads me to suspect it isn't the actual original data display.

Talking about the harmful effects of GMOs in general is a significant simplification. A recent evaluation of plant genomes has shown that 7% of them are naturally modified organisms with agrobacterial plasmids (see https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tatiana-Matveeva-3/research ).

I participated in the work on safety assessment of genetically modified plants in 1998-2004. Suggested (often imaginary) steps of Greenpeace and other GMO-protestors in the risk recognition were an important motive for choosing them for evaluation without their real value.

Scientific Conduct in Research ->

#research #scientificconduct #intellectualhonesty #researchintegrity #ethics #philosophy #researchlanguage #researchexcellence #researchwork #researchtips #researchskills

In addition, I would like to say a little more.

A. C. Graham's Chinese Philosophy is also very good Another Western scholar Ivanhoe's essay entitled Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism... to name just a few. Please be informed that every 5 years there is an International Conference in Honour of the 257Xth Anniversary of Confucius and xth of the International Confucian Association held in Beijing. In Its Proceedings, the last volume is always in English, where papers on Confucian ethics are compiled, quite bulky indeed! Hope it helps. To know Chinese ethics, de Bary's Sources of Chinese Tradition is a standard reference for beginners. Mei Kao Kow

The legal and ethical implications of using an artificial intelligence tool like "ChatGPT" to gather information and generate ideas depend on how it is used and the specific context. From a legal perspective, as long as the usage adheres to intellectual property rights and data protection regulations, it can be considered legal. However, the ethical aspect requires careful consideration. Using AI tools to gather information can be beneficial if the sources are reliable and properly attributed. However, blindly relying on AI-generated ideas without critical thinking and independent verification may raise concerns about plagiarism, lack of originality, and academic integrity. It is important to strike a balance between leveraging AI tools as aids and maintaining responsible research practices that uphold intellectual honesty and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.

Here are some tips on how to use ChatGPT or AI tools ethically in scientific writing:

Use AI tools to enhance your writing, not replace it: AI tools can support and improve scientific writing, but they should not replace human input entirely. Ensure that you have a thorough understanding of the topic and the research before turning to AI tools to incorporate relevant information.

Cite your sources accurately: When using AI to generate content, ensure that it provides accurate citations for the sources used. Verify that the sources are credible to avoid any misinformation in the research literature.

Avoid plagiarism: Using an AI tool does not exempt you from plagiarism. Ensure that the content generated is not a direct copy from any existing work. Carefully review the content to ensure proper attribution of ideas.

Respect the ethical guidelines: Follow ethical guidelines set by scientific communities and the journal publishing the research paper. Avoid using AI tools to distort results to advance specific agendas.

Keep AI use transparent: Be transparent about the use of AI in your writing. Disclose the use of AI tools in your work and maintain complete control over your content.

AI tools can be a useful resource in scientific writing, but it's important to use them ethically. Always prioritize human involvement and ensure that AI tools support, rather than replace, human input. Use them transparently, citing sources accurately, avoiding plagiarism, and respecting ethical guidelines.

Author: K. F. Stein, Colleen Corte, K. B. Colling, A. Whall

Publish Year: 1998

A theoretical analysis of Carper's ways of knowing using a model o…

📷

Check this out.

Discouraging nd critising unable to note any good

I think it's both.

Behaviour and expected behaviour of 'sufferer'. how they deal with life, their productivity.

But your question seems about who decides. Experiences can be understood through a wide spectrum but psychiatry understands it through a limited arc. Diagnosis creates the illness.

Thank you for your contribution Dr. Alexandru Ioan , what worries me is that if addiction is created, it open the door for a new human need, from one point of view it is a development with the merits of (Economic Growth-Improved Quality of Life-Technological Advancement), from the other point of view it is (Consumer Manipulation-Overconsumption and Waste-Shifting Priorities-Dependency)!

ensuring that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks and that ethical considerations are taken into account is crucial when creating a human need!

Obviously there is no censur anymore althugh we know that what they show on TV are very bad and unethic.

Mmadikila: Superb response. You've provided some excellent insights into why both the work ethic and the play ethic are important in physical education and in sports.

Balancing utility and ethics in a highly competitive environment can be challenging, but it is possible with a thoughtful approach. Here are some strategies to help you navigate this balance:

Remember, finding the balance between utility and ethics is an ongoing process that requires continuous evaluation and adjustment. It's important to remain vigilant and committed to upholding your ethical standards, even in the face of intense competition.

لابد من ربط القيم والسلوكيات والأخلاق بخالق العالم حتى تثمر تلك القيم والأخلاق

Dear Fatma Elfergani

It is my understanding that a study published in Rahim's Organizational Conflict Inventory in 2021 or 2022 found that there was a significant negative correlation between the use of integrated conflict management strategies and ethical leadership scores. However, it is important to highlight that the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational conflict is complex and multifaceted; however, some studies indicate that ethical leadership practices can help reduce organizational conflicts.

I hope this helps.

In my opinion, always it is ethical.

Yes, addressing ethical requirements is crucial for the acceptance of data analytics by futurists. Future perspectives are likely to emphasize privacy protection, fairness, informed consent, accountability, transparency, and evaluating social impact. Ethical considerations will play a significant role in shaping the future of data analytics.

regarding the comment made at 45:40, if you speak of "avoiding unintented consequences", then you show that you have NO IDEA what unintended consequences are...

You have posed an interesting bunch of queries. The essence of reflexivity in qualitative/ethnographic research is that rather than removal but it is essential to reflect upon one's biases, exposing the journey of the ethnographic navigation. You may like to go through my reflective account of doing ethnographic research in Nepal (through the following book chapter published in The Palgrave Handbook of Social Fieldwork (2023).

The ecological footprint would be such a sustainability method and empirical example of responsibility; there are several ecological foot print calculators available, which differ in their methodical measurement technique ( e.g. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/footprint-calculator/. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/ https://www.footprintcalculator.org/home/en https://footprint.wwf.org.uk/ ).

The integration of word + math definitions (statements) works by logic and reason; those ethical principles, which are applicable by the light of reason and logic, can be included in the scientific model of measuring human responsibility.

________

Metaphysics should be included as creative and separate discourse dimension, in terms of formulating ultimate beliefs on human life and responsible action to extend our models, in explanatory manner of reality

(data, facts, conclusions, beliefs).

To be and to have meaning are the same. Parmenides

Dear peers, this is the research question about ChatGPT ethical challenges for medical publishing.

I believe there is a difference between mirror neuron and ethics of care. By definition, mirror neurons are neurons that get activated when one observes an act performed by another and or feel the intentions and emotions behind the action. For example, if someone smiles at another, the mirror neurons get activated both based on observation of the act and also intentions and emotions that caused the act of smiling. Ethics of care is defined a little differently. In ethics of care, act of caring is initiated by carer (individual performing the act of caring) but unless the individual that is being cared for accept it, the act of caring is not complete. This happens a lot in the classrooms. A teacher may be extremely a caring teacher with good intentions, but unless the student sees that and accept it, the act of caring is incomplete. It is not action and reaction like mirror neurons are.

No, it is not necessarily unethical, in my experience, especially when you are building on your previous work, and especially if you work in a unique area. References should not just be window dressing. They should be relevant. Ideally you found them as you did research before you wrote your paper, although some may come in along the way.

More references from other people, however, may be taken as a sign that you did properly research your topic.

I agree with the comments made by Denis above. Perhaps they can best be encompassed by the approach of casuistry which is iterative/analogous. It is case-based moral reasoning based on principlism and legalism. This approach works well within the framework of an organisation.

Yes, AI has a strong connection to law and ethics. As AI systems become increasingly advanced and ubiquitous, they raise a number of complex legal and ethical issues that must be addressed. Here are some ways in which AI is connected to law and ethics:

Overall, the intersection of AI, law, and ethics is complex and multifaceted, and will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration between experts in these fields to ensure that AI is developed and used in a responsible and ethical manner.

Hi Abdelhak Belkadi,

I'm glad that you are interested in using our Highscore SW. We provide a time-limited trial version, free of charge, for university researchers. Please feel free to reach out to me if you'd like to obtain an official license key for your work.

Best regards,

Zhaohui (product manager Empyrean, Malvern Panalytical).

Data analytics and AI are like the Batman and Robin of marketing. By analyzing customer data, developing customer personas, and using predictive analytics, you can tailor your marketing messages and offers to each individual customer, kind of like Batman tailors his gadgets to each unique villain. Chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI can help you provide personalized customer support, just like Robin has Batman's back. So, if you want to improve customer engagement, unleash the power of data analytics and AI and create a personalized and engaging customer experience.