Science topic
Essays - Science topic
Essays are works consisting of collections of papers or interpretive literary compositions not previously published.
Questions related to Essays
What are methods to create meaningful models and conclusion by perusing of essay. What these techniques are known as in research methodology subject
One of my essays is listed as being published in an Ophthalmology Journal. However, it is a History essay which is published in The American Historical Review. How do I correct the mistake?
The 2 theories have epistemologically ("how to get knowledge") Distinct starting points, i underly here epistemological, not methodological i.e on level of phosophy of knowledge
GR considers or tests on hypothesis that the properties of matter and radiation(mostly radiation i.e light) are given i.e constant speed or state equations and describes in details the time space that is the results of these, then motion emerges i.e geodesic etc
QM takes hypothesis that spacetime is given i.e symmetry of Hamiltonian and studies properties of matter or particles (and their motion). Properties of particles are
emergent i.e spin
According to the incompatibility thesis*, the two approaches yield knowledge from different hypotheses. There is no. Middle ground as this would destroy tge knowledge generating process
*I will elaborate soon on a essay
I am writing an extended essay on the Christianisation of medieval Europe, with a particular focus on burial practices as a case study. I have found quite a bit of information but am always looking for more sources. Do you have or know of any sources that may help? Historiographical, archaeological, primary, anything in any of those areas?
Thank you in advance!
Blessings Dear researchers, we are leading a theological forum in Pakistani Seminary, we want to give the Pakistani theological students, teachers and theologians some topics for writing an essay for competition, Actually we are organizing a competition for theological essays. So, please suggest some topics for essays, one person will write one essay.
I have completed an essay which is about Identity in Popular Culture course, and it explores the ways in which social identities and social relations such as class, gender or racial difference are represented and played out in popular culture.
Is there any professor majored in Sociology? If anyone can help me edit or give me some suggestions, a big reward will provide, Thanks!
What will open the cite reference for Dr. Lohans Kalyani: The Role of Technology in Education?
“1)This ANTI-racist essay rejects both racialism and racial essentialism, beginning with epistemology, physics, chemistry, biology, and then social sciences, of course with some overlap. Humans have, AT LEAST PARTIAL, free will or they could not fundamentally choose to focus on life, thus all reason would be futile “And if humans lack free will then the reasoning behind anything would not exist”(Ohnemus 2023). Thus self-evident PARTIAL free will debunks biological determinism. Biological determinism, at least in this essay and many other senses, also means scientific materialism. Thus, humans probably have souls, OR AT LEAST hereditarianism is wrong. Science only approximately derives from philosophy because direct derivation would be a non-sequitur. Plus, the relationship between science and philosophy is very complicated. Philosophy speculates more and changes upon scientific discovery. Yet science rests upon philosophical postulates, such as the philosophy of science.”
ESSAY COMPETITIONTheme:Considering Tanzania’s abundant extractive resources (Minerals and natural gas), how can the country harness its resources to drive sustainable development in the context of climate change?
I need to write research essay, what will be a good question. suggestions please.
"Do university students with disabilities perform better academically with accommodations compared to those who do not receive accommodations?
or
Do elementary school children with disabilities perform better academically with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) compared to standard teaching methods?
which one is easier to find data for reviews.
Are these good questions for academic purposes?
An essay about linkage between South African' national development planning and SDGs
Astronomy, the scientific study of celestial bodies and the universe as a whole, has made remarkable strides over the centuries. From the early observations of the night sky to the sophisticated space telescopes and deep-space missions of today, our understanding of the cosmos has evolved significantly. Yet, despite these advancements, many fundamental questions remain unresolved. These unsolved problems not only highlight the limits of our current knowledge but also underscore the vastness of what we have yet to discover. This essay explores some of the most pressing unsolved problems in astronomy, shedding light on their implications and the ongoing efforts to tackle them.
#### 1. The Nature of Dark Matter
One of the most significant unsolved problems in astronomy is the nature of dark matter. Dark matter is a mysterious substance that does not emit, absorb, or reflect light, making it invisible to current astronomical instruments. Despite its elusive nature, dark matter is thought to constitute about 27% of the universe's mass-energy content. Its existence is inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, such as galaxies and galaxy clusters.
The precise composition of dark matter remains unknown. Several candidate particles have been proposed, including Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), axions, and sterile neutrinos. However, no direct detection of dark matter has yet been achieved, and experiments designed to uncover its properties, such as those conducted at underground laboratories and through astronomical observations, have yet to provide conclusive results.
#### 2. The Enigma of Dark Energy
Complementing the mystery of dark matter is the problem of dark energy. Dark energy is hypothesized to be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, a discovery that led to the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. Dark energy is thought to make up approximately 68% of the universe's energy density. However, its nature remains one of the most profound mysteries in cosmology.
Several theories attempt to explain dark energy, including the cosmological constant proposed by Albert Einstein and various dynamic field models. Despite extensive observations, such as those from supernovae and the cosmic microwave background, scientists have yet to identify the fundamental properties or source of dark energy.
#### 3. The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies
The formation and evolution of galaxies is another area of active research with many unanswered questions. Although simulations and observations have provided valuable insights into galaxy formation, significant gaps remain in our understanding. Key questions include how the first galaxies formed after the Big Bang, the role of supermassive black holes in galaxy evolution, and the processes that govern galaxy mergers and interactions.
Observations of distant galaxies provide a window into the early universe, but interpreting these observations involves complex models and assumptions. As telescopes such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) offer increasingly detailed views of distant galaxies, researchers hope to refine our understanding of these processes.
#### 4. The Origin of Cosmic Magnetic Fields
Cosmic magnetic fields are ubiquitous in the universe, influencing the behavior of charged particles and the structure of interstellar and intergalactic matter. Despite their prevalence, the origin of these magnetic fields remains an open question.
Several theories propose mechanisms for generating cosmic magnetic fields, including dynamo processes in early stars and galaxies, or primordial fields produced during the Big Bang. However, the exact processes that led to the observed large-scale magnetic fields are still under investigation, and understanding them could provide insights into fundamental aspects of cosmic evolution.
#### 5. The Nature of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs)
Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are intense, brief bursts of radio waves detected from distant galaxies. Discovered in 2007, these enigmatic signals last only a few milliseconds but release energy equivalent to that of the Sun over several days.
The origins of FRBs are still unknown. Proposed explanations range from neutron stars and black holes to more exotic scenarios like alien technology. Despite numerous detections and follow-up studies, the precise mechanisms behind FRBs remain elusive. Understanding FRBs could reveal new information about the conditions in distant galaxies and the nature of high-energy astrophysical processes.
#### 6. The Search for Extraterrestrial Life
The search for extraterrestrial life is perhaps one of the most profound and exciting areas of astronomy. While we have discovered thousands of exoplanets in the habitable zones of their stars, the question of whether life exists beyond Earth remains unanswered.
Efforts such as the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program aim to detect signals from advanced civilizations, while missions like the Mars rovers and the upcoming Europa Clipper seek to explore the potential habitability of other planets and moons in our solar system. Despite these efforts, no definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life has been found. The discovery of even the simplest forms of life elsewhere would have profound implications for our understanding of life's prevalence and diversity in the universe.
#### Conclusion
The field of astronomy is rich with mysteries and challenges that continue to inspire and intrigue scientists and enthusiasts alike. From the elusive nature of dark matter and dark energy to the enigmatic origins of cosmic magnetic fields and Fast Radio Bursts, these unsolved problems underscore the vastness of our ignorance and the ongoing quest for knowledge. As observational techniques advance and theoretical models evolve, future discoveries may shed light on these profound questions, further expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it. The journey to unravel these cosmic mysteries is not only a testament to human curiosity but also a reminder of the boundless frontiers that still await exploration.
According to the theory of gravity: the gravity between the Sun and the Moon is almost twice that of the Earth and the Moon.
But!!!
Gravity between the Moon and the Earth (150000000 × 150000000 × 384400k)/330000
It is greater than the gravity between the moon and the sun.
More than the square of the distance from the earth to the sun.
k is greater than 1.
This formula is not complete and is only for comparison.
In space, the gravity formula is related to the core of space objects. It has nothing to do with crime
Unfortunately, I cannot explain easily now.
I write very briefly.
1- The moon is inside the rings of the earth.
The moons and rocks around the earth are either children of the earth or adopted children of the earth.
As a result, the core of the moon takes its power from the core of the earth.
The reason is related to the kernel. Coming soon with the formula.
In the mother and child gravity formula: it has a direct relationship with the distance and a direct relationship with the strength of the nuclei.
As a result, the gravity of the moon and the earth is very high.
Full explanation of the gravity formula inside the Earth, with calculations coming soon.
a point:
The moon is accepted: because it entered the rings around the earth from outside the earth. The moon comes from the Kuiper Belt between Mars and Jupiter. This happened when the core of the sun shook and the balance of the planets was disturbed.
The power of the moon's core when it was in the Kuiper belt was very high and it rotated at a speed of about 10 hours. When the moon entered the earth's ring. The core of the moon cooled and lost its power. Reasons in an essay.
After the separation of the Moon, Mercury also separated from the Kuiper Belt at the same time, but the Earth's core had captured the Moon and no longer had the power to trap Mercury. As a result, Mercury goes to the rings of Venus. How the Moon and Mercury separate from the Kuiper belt: Due to the strong vibration in their cores, the speed of rotation of their cores increases, as a result of which their rotation is stretched and penetrates into the orbits of Earth and Venus. I provide the full reason and calculations with the formula.
As a result of the second big shock to the Sun's core, Mercury is separated from Venus and returns to the Sun.
Earth also has a smaller moon called Mehsa, which disintegrated in the second tremor of the Sun's core and fell to Earth, giving rise to life on Earth.
Description of the story with all the details and reasons soon.
2- The moon is also inside the rings of the sun. But the sun gives very little power to the moon's core. The reason is related to the kernel. With the formula coming soon
The sun is the mother of the earth. Earth is the godmother of the moon.
The formula of gravity between the sun and the moon is the same as the formula of two independent bodies. In two independent bodies: gravity is inversely related to the square of the distance between them.
It has a direct relationship with the strength of the nuclei. As a result, the gravity between the Earth and the Moon is infinitely greater than the gravity between the Sun and the Moon.
Full description of gravity formula on independent bodies with calculations coming soon.
& WHAT ALSO IF THESES (MASTERS, DOCTORATES) ARE DONE BY AI ( ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ) ! ?
As it is well known that already so many masters & doctorate theses mostly other than medicine & medical sciences & natural sciences are written & prepared as theses professionally by others for the sake of money as ordered and paid by the canditates of master & doctorate !?
Write a reflective essay on the importance of teacher involvement in curriculum development
I hope this message finds you well. My name is Alvin Khanbashi, and I recently completed my master's degree in architecture from Deakin University, Australia, in June 2024. I am writing to inquire about the possibility of publishing two of my academic works through your esteemed journal.
I would greatly appreciate any guidance you could provide regarding the submission and publication process for these works. Specifically, I am interested in understanding the requirements, deadlines, and any other pertinent information needed to proceed with the submissions.
Thank you very much for your time and assistance. I look forward to your response.
Regards,
Alvin
Write an essay on the same
I have been writing about sustainability strategies in my cover essay. I described the strategic process as:
1) Setting a sustainability target.
2) Developing a strategy to reach the target.
3) Developing a method to assess whether a decision taken today fits within the strategy.
4) Ensure that this method is used by practitioners and that they have incentives to take sustainable decisions.
A comment I got was that not all strategies are based on fulfilling a target, that this approach is not universal and should be justified. However I have so far failed to find appropriate literature, in part because the keywords "goal-oriented strategy" yield literature about corporate management.
Has a similar approach, or an alternative approach, been theorized? What are example of sustainability strategies that do not start by setting a target?
I heard this from someone:
When students were assigned to defend a stance opposite to their own held view in a debate, their personally held views were permanently altered, closer to center from their originally held views.
To my knowledge this phenomenon was studied in a university somewhere, but I can't seem to find reference to it. Can anyone confirm for me that this is in fact true? Can anyone point me in the right direction so that I could cite the study in an essay?
How would you explain this in a 2500 word essay looking at critical theories to do with intersectionality and academic references
"Becoming Wolf" is an academic essay, 6600 words in length with a few black-and-white images. How do I go about uploading it to ResearchGate?
That's the title of an essay I have to write in qualitative methods For my PHD. As I love to include individual perspectives like an ethnographic perspective into the academic field to it, I want to ask you for your advice. What are things to do, what to avoid. And what was your moment to remember doing literature reviews?
How do I change my profile to reflect I'm a student? I requested a full article because I wanted to read it for an essay I'm writing for school. It required that I create a profile. My first selection was to report I was a student or in academia. Now it appears my profile reflects I am a professional in the department.
Also, how can I get a full article for an essay i'm working on?
I was told to do this essay plan using the APA style of writing with citations and more references must be included. And word limit is 1500.
Just to be on the safe side and to avoid violating any rules.
Are individual rights COMPLETELY dismissible under the notion they are not absolute? How My answer: No because human rights are linked to diversity, equity and inclusion as described in the following essays:
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
Code Popper-Freud Theorem
General Ethics:
General Ethics:
LGBTQAA+ rights:
LGBTQAA+ rights:
Theology:
Theology:
Theology:
Politics:
Politics:
Research Proposal PhD by Published Work Research Proposal- Harmony Between the...
Write an academic essay on the topic "from diploma to skills: a revolution in education and the labor market" in the APA chair, as well as in the essay there should be a list of references
According to popular belief, generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT, does not understand the context of questions well. How well can ChatGPT cope with writing a philosophy essay? Are there any scientific studies on this topic?
The essay "Beyond Progress: Debunking the Myth of Scientific-Economic Advancement" (see link at the end) raises a fundamental question: who does science really serve in contemporary society? This debate invites us to collectively reflect on whether the current paths of scientific investigation are aligned with the pursuit of pure knowledge, driven by curiosity and the need to explore.
Discussing the concept of 'Dynamic Genostability', which proposes a new way of understanding the relationship between human bioenergetics and DNA transmission, the essay challenges the dominance of economic, governmental, corporate, and editorial interests in science. I am interested in hearing your thoughts on the following questions:
- How specifically are these interests currently influencing the priority areas and themes of scientific research?
- How can we ensure that science maintains its focus on the advancement of knowledge itself, rather than primarily serving economic interests?
I encourage participation from people of various fields, including scientists, philosophers of science, economists, and other professionals, to enrich our understanding of these critical issues.
Your participation is essential for a rich and diverse debate.
The recent essay "Beyond Progress: Unmasking the Myth of Scientific-Economic Advancement" raises a fundamental question: who does science really serve in contemporary society? This debate is an opportunity for us to collectively reflect on whether the current paths of scientific research are aligned with the true interests and needs of humanity.
Discussing the concept of 'Dynamic Genostability' and the interplay between pure and applied science, the essay challenges the prevalence of economic interests in shaping scientific advancements. I invite the community to ponder over these questions:
- How are economic and corporate interests shaping current scientific research?
- How can we ensure that science continues to serve human well-being and the advancement of knowledge, rather than merely economic interests?
Your participation and insights are valuable in enriching this crucial debate.
I've had two articles published. Both are nearly identical, and I'd like to write a comparison article about their outcomes. For this, I'll need to use Comsol for simulation or machine learning/deep learning to validate the results. I'd appreciate it if someone could assist me in this area and contribute to the comparative essay.
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372887967_Formation_of_AgshellAucore_Bimetallic_Nanoparticles_by_Pulsed_Laser_Ablation_Method_Effect_of_ColloidalSolution_Concentration
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369671290_Optical_properties_of_synthesized_AuAg_Nanoparticles_using_532_nm_and_1064_nm_pulsed_laser_ablation_effect_of_solution_concentration
This is an essay question requiring the following;
1. Urban Sociology – Meaning, Definition & Characteristics.
2. Problems of Urbanisation in Eswatini
3. Significance of urban sociology in restraining urban problems.
4. Summary and conclusion
5. References
I decided to write an essay exploring a particular topic. I aim to discuss the evolution of this subject through various philosophical and contemporary psychological perspectives. The essay will serve as a brief summary and history, supplemented by my own arguments.
I would appreciate suggestions from fellow members of ResearchGate. I wonder if it's feasible to cover such a vast topic in one article, considering that it could easily fill a whole book (not by me, of course). Therefore, my question is whether it is realistic to encompass all of that in a single essay of approximately 10,000 words, which would be around 34 pages.
Thank You!
my essay is about the mass amount of changes into the packaging design industry since the 1900s to now, and what factors are taken into consideration for changes to be made and what's included in those factors, such as technological changes and developments or consumer preferences and design trends. struggling wiht finding good research sources to help me formulate ideas and discussion points
How can write a convincing poster and scientific essay? Anyone with a sample?
Biodiversity is often an abstract concept. In my recent essay, I illustrate this vastness, with humans being just a minuscule fraction. Curious? Check it out and share your thoughts: "The Invisible Star in the Sky: Scaling Humanity within Earth's Vast Biodiversity" [https://osf.io/87mgh/]
Preprint A Close Reading of Barbauld
A few years ago, my friend Robert Gainer and I were sharing our essays when we were at Warwick University. I accidentally uploaded his one night instead of mine. As a matter of intellectual integrity, I need this removing please. We have both gone on to do PG courses, and would appreciate your cooperation in this matter. I am not at UOB and no longer have access to my Warwick email.
Best, Jill
Are there any Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning based tools publicly available for essay evaluations/assessment?
medical anthropology, an essay of 2000-2500 words.
I am currently workingo on a essay on Adenauer, De Gasperi and Schuman and the construction of european unity
The reviewers bias stand in the way of a publication or proposal being funded. That happened to me a couple of times (re essays and even as to grant proposals , The biases of the reviewer can get in the way of genuine progress.
I'm currently finalising the referencing and formatting for my MRes thesis. However, as I come from a science background and haven't had that much experience with humanities referencing, especially MHRA, there are still some areas about which I'm uncertain.
Throughout my thesis, I've referenced Tolkien's essay 'On Fairy-Stories':
Tolkien, J.R.R., ‘On Fairy-Stories’, in Tolkien on Fairy-Stories, ed. by Veryln Flieger and Douglas A. Anderson (London: HarperCollins, 2008), pp. 27–84
All references are to the main version in Flieger's and Anderson's collection. However, in this volume I need to reference a passage from a manuscript of an earlier version of the essay, 'BODLEIAN TOLKIEN MS. 6 FOLIOS 6-8'. The page from which I'm quoting is page 257. How would I reference this?
This is a relatively unimportant issue, though I need to get this sorted as I'm submitting a draft soon.
Thank you.
Critical thinking is preserved for humanities where "objective thinking" is the currenvy and comp advantage of sciences.
Similarly, essays, log and report Qs are currenvy of humanities. But assesment theory, mostly developed by humanities insights (it is human centered not physical environment centered) covers both.
In this excer from a module on Material and Quantum nanotechnologies, both the outcomes & assesment is evolved from the traditional.
"By he end of this module, you’ll be able to:
apply the fundamentals of quantum physics to nanomaterials and the associated emerging technologies
understand the principles and usage of common characterisation techniques in nanotechnology
demonstrate critical awareness of current research and its limitations.
Types of assessments may include:
a report (40%) – a written critical bibliography of current research trends
a report (20%) – a written structured question to an industry stakeholder
a log (40%) – a written log detailing thevcompletion of a data analysis project."
Do you think it should be more widely endorsed in physics dept masters?
hello, professor, I want to know if every essay should have table, form and sheet? My major belong to humanities, how to make the table， form which in the essay? thank you very much.
AI can be a double-aged sword. Generative AI tools might be difficult in identifying differences in machine learning text and general text essay. Academia might have an even bigger challenge on its hands????
I believe no.
think physics overeliance on problem calculations creates lazy thinkers, because the hase study on typical knowledge, exam archetype problems, routines etc
I think that essays are insdequate to asses physics is a misconception.
Critical thinking criteria can be assesed via difficult essay questions i.e role of proper time in SR that demand conceptual growth,synthesis, deep understanding of mathematical formulas & theory
Maybe less skills on managing formalism, but still critical thinking if a level worthy of gaining a masters and proving credentials for worthy research.
Maybe a partial skillset test to be acompanied as degree requirement, partial fulfillment, not as the core as it exists.
I think physics overeliance on problem calculations creates lazy thinkers, because the hase study on typical knowledge, exam archetype problems, routines etc
This is for my Extended Essay, which is an academic requirement of the IB Program. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
With relevant examples from Ghana, write an essay to discuss the implications (both positive and negative) of high population growth on economic development. without piliagiarizing
Proust attended Tarde's inaugural lecture at the École libre des sciences politiques in 1896, and took some notes about it (now published in Proust's Essais [Gallimard, 2022]). I'm looking for any additional information about the Proust<>Tarde connection, both anecdotal and theoretical? Thank you!! a
I believe physics masters programs need innovation to overcome the slow progress in solving theoretical problems in physics in the form of ph.D replicating standards.
Imagine a student who has to write an essay about the paradoxes of dpevial relativity, literature teview akin ph.D and outline ideas to explsin them with his own indights
Or a similar topic about unitary quantum mechanics/spacetime quantization approaches duch CST.
Or a topic about how space has time properties, how its ststic vs dynamic fluidity give rise to spacetime phenomena.
Although some mofules would have more trafitional mathematical emphasis, 60% would have conceptual pre- ph.D level.
We wish to create a prototype of an automated essay scoring (AES) system using a large language model like GPT-3.5. The AES will aid teachers in evaluating essay and reflection paper assignments submitted by business students taking a creativity and innovation management course via the Canvas LMS.
In your opinion, how to build an IT anti-plagiarism system that will verify essays written by students in schools and credit and diploma theses written by students in universities, taking into account the issue of possible and incompatible with the rules of the school, university use of automatic text generation tools, use of artificial intelligence, including, for example, ChatGPT? ChatGPT, i.e. taking into account the issue of the author's observance of copyright, correct use of sources, from other publications, reliable independent editing of the text of the essay, thesis, including bachelor's, master's, doctoral and other theses?
One solution may be to build an IT anti-plagiarism system, which would also use artificial intelligence solutions analysing the degree of similarity between texts written by pupils in school essays and theses written by students in universities with texts generated by e.g. ChatGPT and concerning the same issues.
However, before such a computerised anti-plagiarism system can be used to verify essays written by students at schools and pass theses and diploma theses written by students at universities, taking into account the possible use of artificial intelligence, including e.g. ChatGPT, certain changes should be made to the rules and regulations of schools, colleges and universities, taking particular account of the author's observance of copyright, the correct use of sources and other publications, and reliable, independent editing of essays, diploma theses, including bachelor's, master's, doctoral and other theses. Besides, before such an IT anti-plagiarism system is built, other supplementary and auxiliary solutions can be applied.
Another solution may be for teachers to require pupils and students to reliably, fully, methodologically demonstrate the data sources, source publications for all specific phrases, wording, content, information, statements, for every sentence that was not written from the author's own autopsy, the author's own experience of the work, etc. used in the written essay, credit work and other work. This type of solution may also be helpful on the issue of verification of the accuracy of the writing, i.e. without the use of a ChatGPT-type tool carried out by an IT anti-plagiarism system, which will verify this issue by comparing the content of the written work with the knowledge base used by ChatGPT. Therefore, it may be necessary to make the knowledge base used by ChatGPT (currently a knowledge base created on the basis of content downloaded in 2021 from a number of selected websites) available to IT companies developing IT anti-plagiarism systems that verify the above-mentioned issue of the reliability of the written text, i.e. without the use of a ChatGPT-type tool.
Another interim solution for the period before the creation of an IT anti-plagiarism system to verify the accuracy of the writing, i.e. without the use of the ChatGPT tool, could be for teachers to require their students to prepare and carry out project work requiring the use of various aspects of creativity as an alternative to written essays, credit essays and dissertations.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How, in your opinion, to build an IT anti-plagiarism system that will verify essays written by students at schools and credit and diploma theses written by students at universities, taking into account the issue of possible and incompatible with the rules of the school, university use of automatic text generation tools, use of artificial intelligence, including e.g. ChatGPT, i.e. taking into account the issue of the author's observance of copyright, correct use of sources, from other publications, reliable independent editing of the text of the essay, thesis, including bachelor's, master's, doctoral and other theses?
How to build an IT-based anti-plagiarism system that will verify the theses and dissertations written by students for possible use in their ChatGPT?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Counting on your opinions, on getting to know your personal opinion, on an honest approach to discussing scientific issues and not the ready-made answers generated in ChatGPT, I deliberately used the phrase "in your opinion" in the question.
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
I have not used other sources or automatic text generation systems such as ChatGPT in writing this text.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
I’m writing a thesis on the intertextual relationships between Shakespeare’s Hamlet and John Updike’s novel Gertrude and Claudius, and I could use some essay or literary analysis of this work.
In his essay (https://theloop.ecpr.eu/can-you-put-food-inside-words-are-invitations-not-containers/), Christian Ewert argues that narratives - or stories - are powerful. This is so because they can be shared and, through that virtue, they can inform others, challenge beliefs, broaden horizons, lead to changed thoughts, even new outcomes in behaviour, policies, and so forth.
Given the power of stories, which Agustin Goenaga (https://theloop.ecpr.eu/what-democracy-should-be-for-us/) also highlights, should we all be doing more to tell stories to others, to so called "lay persons", from our research - especially to sing praise of the works of those we admire?
Leonardo Fiorespino argues that "[d]emocracy and butterflies are two very different objects of analysis". See his essay here for more: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/i-classify-therefore-i-know/
The crux of Fiorespino's claim is that "[a] butterfly is an empirical entity, whereas democracy is a contested concept".
But surely we can find instances in this world where democracy is not contested as a concept but the butterfly is! Furthermore, outside of "conventional democratic theory", democracy is often considered a well-defined, uncontested, empirical entity.
So where does this leave us? Does the contestatory nature of a concept somehow invalidate its capacity to be used in relation to a different, less/more contested, concept?
I don't think so. To me, clarity for the purposes of comparison is gained through careful definition and agreement by members of a discussion (discursive enclave) over the meaning of the definitions. That's obviously not an original position as it's been around for centuries. But somehow it feels novel.
What are your thoughts in relation to the above?
The essay has a total word requirement of 2500 (+/- 5%) words. It should demonstrate proper use of
tables and diagrams and graphs where necessary and should also demonstrate in-depth research skills
including use of a wide variety of information sources, proper citations and referencing formatting, and
proper paraphrasing of borrowed ideas and information
When it comes to democracy: "[w]hat are the purposes of definitions? Are definitions enough? How much can we understand from a definition? And how can we give voice to the people these definitions are about?"
These excellent questions are posed by Friedel Marquardt in her essay here: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/who-gets-a-say-in-the-meanings-of-democracy/
Marquardt's answer to the first question is that: "The definitions of democracy capture a manifestation of it within a particular context and community."
The next question is what the good aspects and bad aspects of this outcome are. For example, relying on texts can give us the capacity to capture more information about democracy. But, relying only on texts leaves out so very much information as Marquardt, Hans Asenbaum, and Hilary Gopnik make clear.
What do you think?
I am writing an essay on performance spaces that host balls for the LGBTQ community, I have researched the underground balls in Harlem which the most famous example being the Imperial Elks lodge, however there is no photos or information inside of what it looks like inside.
Ernesto Cruz Ruiz reminds us that understanding democracy requires more than a focus on the language/s used to define it, to describe it.
For more, see Ruiz's essay here: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/a-specimen-drawer-to-capture-the-evolution-of-democracy/
In the forthcoming book, "The Sciences of the Democracies", we detail that we can learn about democracy from people, groups, non-texts and non-humans, as well as from texts.
Is there anything you would add to that list? What's missing?
In his essay, Adrian Bua Roberts argues that
"Democratisation strategies unaware of how they interact with capitalist dynamics are bound to lack impact and reproduce capitalism"
Can you name a democratisation strategy that has, will, or may undo capitalism (or at least not reproduce it)?
The US recently intercepted and shot down a Chinese balloon flying over US territory. The US claims that it was a “spy balloon”. In a press conference, the US indicated that they were aware of 39 other countries who also had intercepted Chinese balloons over their countries. When queried by a journalist as to how the US had come by this information and which countries these were, the US spokesperson replied that they had their means of acquiring this information but would not disclose how. The current tensions between China and the United States open up interesting questions regarding espionage and foreign policy during rising global tensions. Espionage by countries, including allies, is a common occurrence. In response to the above, your essay should: a. Critically discuss this statement in relation to the legitimacy of spying among states. In your essay, contextualise the current US-China tensions (that have grown since 2018), and what the “spy balloon” saga may mean for US-China relations (e.g. from a foreign policy perspective). b. Why would China exploit a seemingly low-tech form of espionage when they have hundreds of satellites orbiting the earth? Ensure your essay has an introduction and conclusion, as well as a detailed bibliography and is properly referenced throughout.
You have a standard practice of displaying all student work in your classroom. Recently, you assigned students to write any essay and submit a pictorial depiction on the person they considered to be their hero. One of your students submitted an essay on Jesus and a drawing of the Last Supper.
What would you use Natural Language Processing techniques for if you had access to an enormous digital library of data on "democracy" & closely related concepts?
This question comes from Agustin Goenaga's essay here: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/what-democracy-should-be-for-us/
1. How do you think a teacher/professor can ensure that a paper/essay/research written by his/her students is their own and not a ChatGPT product?
2. What do think is the best way of evaluating a student's academic knowledge/skills, given the AI's impact on academia? (ex. oral examination, discussion between two or more students, hand written papers, multiple choice tests of high difficulty/minimum time, etc)
Kindly give a short essay about theoretical approach to ethics
In his essay, Rongxin Li translates a tremendously prescient Chinese "democracy" proverb. It reads as follows:
While water can carry a boat, it can also overturn it
Li uses the proverb to help explain the Chinese concept of Minben.
To read Li's essay, see: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/minben-as-an-alternative-to-liberal-democracy/
Do you know of a "democracy" proverb - especially from a language other than English? If so, please (oh please!) share it here! :)
In her inspiring essay, Seema Shah argues that we need to put "the lived experiences of historically marginalised communities at the centre of democracy measurement. By doing so, she says, we can meaningfully reshape our understanding of democracy as a practice".
The discussion I propose here is methodological: how can/do we, or should we, measure the live