Engineering Science - Science topic

According to one of the authors of this model, the U-slip used in this model equals the superficial gas velocity at the gas inlet of the fluidized bed.

From what I understand you need suggestions on short training courses, I think if what matters is building a global academic view, you should aim at training in public policies and delve into educational ones.

I submitted a paper to the same journal in June 2020. Till now there is no response from the journal. I emailed the editor several times and there is no response.

The Reynolds number (Re) helps predict flow patterns in different fluid flow situations.

Dear Srinivas Talasila, you can check here to find out your desired SCI Journal without APC: https://www.letpub.com/index.php?page=journalapp

Please see the attached links

1- https://www.elsevier.com/books-and-journals/procedia

2- https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/conference-proceedings

3- https://aip.scitation.org/journal/apc

I'm sorry I can not answer this question

Why science, technology, and engineering? Because those are the fields in which there is demand, ease of access, and mobility, unlike the situation for people with softer skills or for professionals in certain fields (e.g. medicine) in which their credentials aren't accepted at face value and they must go through longish retraining/recertification periods. The folks I know who left from Pakistan and the Middle East were more concerned about stability and freedom and a better life for their children than excessive materialism; they lead modest lifestyles and their desires for comfort and a material safety net are quite middling.

It is not so easy as you think. Citation impact is one of the defining characteristics of journals to be awarded with Journal Impact Factor. Similar yardstick is followed for CiteScore too. In any case, a minimum there years is necessary to calculate Impact Factor ( for CiteScore, four years). If you want high rank or high impact for your journal, from the beginning itself concentrate to maintain quality. If you publish original papers with novel ideas, other researchers will cite your findings. Please read journal selection process for awarding Impact Factor from the link: https://clarivate.com/essays/journal-selection-process/

I suspect the rate limiting step is not really a 4 molecule collision between CO2 and 3 H2 molecules like the rate expression implies. and the water gas shift reaction (CO + H2O <=> H2+ CO2) probably also should be included in the mechanism (most likely goes to equilibrium).

Since the reaction is usually equilibrium limited I would suggest a rate equation numerator with the form K(PH2-H2eq)^a(PCO-COeq)^b. 1 (or 0) is probably a good starting value for a and/or b.

2/3 power Langmuir inhibition by adsorption of H2 also seems a bit unusual. I also prefer partial pressures instead of fugacity in rate constants expressions but it probably doesn't make much difference.

I would try a very simple fit without the denominator for the first pass R = K(PCO-PCOeq) then R = K (PH2 - PH2eq) as a first pass then step by step include both CO and H2 in the numerator then add the denominator to see if it improves the fit. There will probably be a trade off between lowering numerator exponents and raising denominator Ks that will give approximately equivalent data fits.

Don't expect that regression to fit every constant all at once and repeat the regression from very different starting points to see if you can converge to the same answer.

Perhaps because of this mistake is the neglect of the enthalpy or entropy

Fan boudary is simple to use, and you can describe the pressure jump distribution using a polynomial. Remember that for a wind turbine the pressure jump is negative.

My first problem is the term positive polarity, because it does nit indicate which electrode is positive or anodic. Examinating the removals of he anode and the cathode, then we find that the anodic removal for time ranges up to about 1 µs is substantially larger than the cathodic removal. For most metals this turning point (anodic and cathodic removal is equal) between 0.8 and 2 µs. For WC-Co-alloys at this point is 20 µs and higher. WC-Co alloys are therefore machined with anodic workpiece polarity reversal.

The differences between EDM and Micro-EDM are the micromachining is performed exclusively with needle pulses under 2 µs. The same statement applies to the Wire-EDM to.

Therefore, it is incomprehensible to me when working in Papers in Wire-EDM with pulse duration greather than 100 µs. (????)

In the final analysis thus depends on the chosen polarity of processing of the used process energy source (generator).

Hi Maria. As far as I got it without running the code, there is one error at

Check(i) = abs(A(i,i)) - sum(B);

which should rather read

for i=1:n

Check(i) = abs(A(i,i)) - sum(abs(A(i,:)));

if Check(i) < 0

fprintf('The matrix is not strictly diagonally dominant at row %2i\n\n',i)

end

or something like that, since diagonal dominance states that absolute values of diagonal elements are always greater or equal to the absolute values of the other remaining (absolute) row elements.

Moreover, it seems to me that the input matrix A in your example is not diagonal dominant, as e.g. |A(1,1)|<|A(2,1)|.