Science method
Electrophoresis - Science method
An electrochemical process in which macromolecules or colloidal particles with a net electric charge migrate in a solution under the influence of an electric current.
Questions related to Electrophoresis
Could you please guide me about the protocol for conducting electrophoresis at very low concentrations of DNA (below 1 ng/ul)?
I did electrophoresis with two percent agarose gel (+1ul safe stain) and four microliters of DNA + two microliters of loading dye, the DNA concentration was one nanogram per microliter, but I did not see any bands!
I’m planning to run the Comet Assay to assess DNA damage, but I’m debating whether it’s worth investing in a specialized electrophoresis tank or if a standard tank can handle it well enough. Has anyone tried both? I’d love to hear any tips or experiences on whether the specialized tank really makes a difference in terms of accuracy or reproducibility.
Hi everyone,
I am currently facing a challenge in detecting phosphorylated FLT3 at the expected molecular weights of ~130 kDa (non-glycosylated form) and ~160 kDa (glycosylated mature form) in my Western blot experiments. Interestingly, I consistently observe a band at approximately 50 kDa, which is noted in the datasheet for the antibody.
Here are the specifics of my protocol:
- Primary Antibody: Phospho-FLT3 (Tyr591) Antibody #3461 (Cell Signaling Technology).
- Antibody Dilution: 1:250, which is four times more concentrated than the recommended 1:1000 dilution.
- SDS-PAGE: I have employed both 8% and 12% gels.
- Electrophoresis Conditions: 40 minutes at 200V, 0.24 AMPS.
- Transfer Conditions: PVDF membrane activated and transferred for 2 hours at 100V, 0.35 AMPS.
- Detection: SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate.
Despite optimizing various conditions, I have not been able to detect phosphorylated FLT3 at the anticipated higher molecular weight ranges. The lower band at ~50 kDa is consistently present. I am considering whether this could be related to the antibody dilution, electrophoresis, or transfer conditions.
Has anyone encountered similar issues or could provide insights into potential adjustments to enhance the detection of the 130/160 kDa bands? Any recommendations on troubleshooting this would be highly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and expertise.
Estoy haciendo PCR y cuando verifico en electroforesis la presencia de bandas a la media hora aparecen bandas visibles, luego termino dejando correr el gel otra hora mas y esas bandas han desaparecido. ¿Alguien sabe por qué? Estoy segura que las muestras no se salieron del gel.
I'm trying to detect ssDNAs with acrylamide electrophoresis, which seems not working well.
I loaded 10 uL of single strand oligo DNA whose length and concentration is 20 nt and 100 uM, which equals to 6.2 µg (100 pg/µL x 10 µL = 1 nmol ≈ 6.2 µg) of amount, respectively.
I used SAFELOOK(TM) Load-Green (6×) (Wako 199-18153) as a loading dye and stain.
Unexpectedly, I did not see any bands.
I think that the amount of 6.2 µg is quite large and cannot be missed if it is double-strand DNA.
I detected a band of one of my samples, which is 47-nt ssDNA. The brightness of this band was pretty close to that of the DNA ladder, whose DNA amount was 30 ng.
I had never done detection of ssDNA by electrophoresis before, so I don't know what the problem is.
Are ssDNAs much less detectable compared to dsDNAs?
Thank you in advance.
Hi all,
Thank you in advance.
I labelled my membrane receptor (a GPCR 41 kDa; approx 80 kDa with SNAP at N-terminus and nLuc at C-terminus) with SNAP-AlexaFluor-488 (surface/non-permeable) and SNAP-647-SiR (permeable to the membrane). Lysed cells, collected total protein (stored on ice), stored at -20 dC for a week. Ran 10 uL supernatant on mPAGE™ 4-12% Bis-Tris Precast Gel, 10x8 cm. Electrophoresed first at 60V for 6 min (for protein to enter the gel) and then at 200 V for 33 min at room temperature in MOPS running buffer. Post-electrophoresis washed gel with tap water three times for 5 minutes. Scanned on Amersham Typhoon gel scanner using filter Cy2 (488 nm), Cy5 (635 nm), and Cy3 (532 nm). I see no problem with the Cy2 channel, but with the other two channels the images are weird - the gel appears granular, with white patches.
Note: while setting up the tank (just before loading the samples and filling the running buffer) I think I first slightly overtightened to create a seal but stopped and loosened it.
Please find the attached images
Please let me know if you need more information from my end.
Thank you once again.
Hi, I have had some issues with the Nancy-520 dye (it has expired but it had not been open), which I see it got like a crystall once opened (it was stored in 4 ºC). I could see that if it was slightly warmed, it melted and could be used as normal, but when I put it back to refrigeration, it solidifies again, but 2 - 8 ºC is the suggested storage temperature, so it should not get solidified and instead be liquid. Has anyone had an issue like this with that or another dye? Thanks for your help in advance.
Hi folks,
I'm having an issue in my lab with leaking BIORAD plates while polymerizing gels. The equipment is quite worn but I have worked with such equipment before without so much trouble.
I have tried taping the sides and bottoms of the plates, digging the plates into the rubber pads, wrapping them in parafilm....I have tested the water-tightness of each plate before pouring and, despite no evidence of leaking when filled with diH2O or isopropanol, the gels bleed out of the plates slowly, while I wait for them to polymerize.
I suspect the reason I have not had this issue before is that the gels I usually cast were 15%. These ones are 8%. They polymerize quite slowly, giving plenty of time for leaks to sink the gel.
So I am wondering, and no one in my lab is available to guide me through this at the moment, if I were to increase the amount of APS and TEMED in each gel solution, could I accelerate the speed of polymerization without screwing up the gel's usefulness in SDSPAGE?
Thanks for any help!
my Q related to electrophoresis gel is; we run a gel on 80v per 30min, product size is between 1000bp and 2000bp,
I have extracted the plamid of DH5-alpha of E.coli and have done electrophoresis on 1% agarose. But it's alike DNA. Can anyone know what is the size band of its plasmid?
Trouble 1: I ran a PCR reaction and found a low molecular weight band (100 bp) when doing electrophoresis. 1ng plasmid (OD260/280=1.84) was used as template. Final concentration of primers was 0.2uM. I thought that band might be primer dimer. So I ran primer solutions on a gel again without PCR, but i can still see the band. Everything was newly prepared. Length of each primer is 20bp.
Trouble 2: ddH2O was used as negative control but an obvious band (with my target size-1100bp) can be seen. So I ran water directly without PCR and there was nothing on the gel. I freshly prepared water and did PCR again and the 1100bp band appeared again.
How could the above happen? What should I do?
Hello everyone, I have some inquiries about my ARMS-PCR reaction. I have a mutation A19G (bolded nucleotide). GAACGCACGGACATCACCGTGAAGCACAAGCTGGGCGGGGGCCAGTACGGGGAGGTGTACGAGGGCGTGTGGAAGAAATACAGCCTGACGGTGGCCGTGAAGACCTTGAAGGTAGGCTGGGACTGCCGGGGGTGCCCAGGGTACGTGGGGCAAGGCGTCTGCTGGCATTAGGCGATGCATCTGCCTGGAAGTCTACCTCCTGCCTGCTGTCCGAGGGCTTCATTGGC
Wt-F: GAACGCACGGACCTCACCA
M-F: GAACGCACGGACCTCACCG
R: GCCAATGAAGCCCTCGGAC
I checked on SnapGene Viewer and got the following results: With Wt-F -R primer: no binding With M-F-R primer: binding However, in reality, the electrophoresis results show both primer pairs are paired (as in the image below). I would like an explanation for this result and advice on designing primers for my reaction. Thank you.
Translate text with your camera
Hello to all dear professors and researchers. I did the electrophoresis part well in the western blot setup phase. But now I have a problem with the same raw materials and the time of electrophoresis to separate the bands is very long. What do you think is the cause and what are the solutions? Thank you very much.
I synthesized cDNA from my RNA sample that prepared with Trizol. I got the ratio 260/280 in about 1,6. When I was running the PCR to check the primer that I have designed before, I got the smear on my electrophoresis gel which are not as I expected, because the product seems bigger than it should be. I designed primer with product length around 150-200, but the bands appeared in about >300. And for my housekeeping gene, 18S, there were bands in my RT+, RT-, and -ve. So I decided to do DNAse treatment to get rid off the DNA contamination.
But, when I repeat the PCR protocol again, I only got the band for 18S primer on my RT+,RT-, and -ve, while the other primer seemed not work.
What should I do now? Need help since I am new in this field.
Hello everyone. I have an issue with Western blot background when I use a higher percentage polyacrylamide gel during electrophoresis. The very same samples loaded into 10% gel lead to a very clear and nice blot.
In both cases I run the gel under 20 mA during stacking and 30 mA during resolving. I transfer for 90 min under 60 V and I use a nitrocellulose membrane.
Thank you in advance.
Hello,
I am new in PFGE and started by checking Lambda ladder electrophoresis accordingly to BIO-Rad recomendations:
-CHEF DR III
-gel in 0.5x TBE,
-recirculated at 14 °C.
-Run time was 22 hours
-Voltage 6 V/cm
-swith time 50 to 90 seconds
-included angle 120°.
-Initial current before placing the gel was 134, at the end of electrophoresis it reached 170
There were 4 lanes with lambda ladder, stained with ethidium bromide. Results attached. Was the run time too long and marker mooved out of the gel?
My fellow Academic colleagues!
I together with my lab mates have a PCR-related issues that we hope that some(one) of you might have encountered and hopefully solved.
In “short”, our initial PCR (MiniAmp Plus thermocycler) and electrophoresis protocol works like a charm – the latter somewhat modified. We obtain weak to strong band that yielding concentrations of 9 to 20 ng/µl following clean-up using the QIAGEN QIAquick PCR (& Gel) purification/Cleanup Kit (with an acceptable A260/A280 ratio). We obtain rarely, but from time to time, a positive electrophoresis confirmation. But as we are using the same protocol for the confirmation, as for our initial PCR, we should have no issue confirming our results (one band per week).
Usually, when we try to confirm our cut-out electrophoresis bands, running a PCR on our cDNA, something fails. We utilize the same primers and protocol, as for the initial PCR, but nothing shows up in our gel, our at best a streak. We’ve tried renewing our primer mix(s), new isopropanol, new buffers, using both RNAse-free water and the included buffer, modifying temperatures (thermocycler), number of cycles, and using the original non-modified protocol. But nothing results in an electrophoresis band when we try to confirm our initial band.
Thank you for your insights and help!
// Eriksson et al.
I used the Dneasy PowerSoil Pro Kit. But I didn't get a good ratio of 260/280 and 260/230 and didn't get a good band after electrophoresis. I maintain all procedures according to the manufacturer's protocol. What should I do now? Need your valuable suggestions.
I ran PCR using COI universal primers on DNA extracted from lice.
I added 25ul of 2x master mix, 5ul template, and 1ul each of 20uM F and R primers, with the remaining volume made up with DW to a total volume of 48ul, and ran PCR including a control group. However, no bands appeared on the gel after electrophoresis.
I then checked with a nanodrop, and all 5 PCR samples (including the control group) showed concentrations around 20000ng/ul, with A260 readings around 400, 260/230 ratios around 10-11, and 260/280 ratios around 37-47.
Where could I have gone wrong?
I would appreciate input from experienced individuals.
After staining and solidifying my agarose gel, I load the first well of the dried agarose gel with the TrackIt Ladder (10488058) from Invitrogen and load my unstained DNA samples into the other wells. I fill the electrophoresis device on top of the agarose gel without covering it and run the electrophoresis at 35 V (5 min) and 50 V (5 min). Then, I cover the gel with TBE 7 mm above and run the electrophoresis at 65 V (60 min).
When I take the photo with Trans UV BioRad, the ladder bands are distinct and stain well, but the DNA samples are not.
I need help with this, I have tried it with other Invitrogen ladders and without them with the same procedure and the DNA bands are visible, except on this TrackIt Invitrogen ladder.
Greetings for all of scientist using this platform. I have a little problem. Recently I had done reconstruction of my plasmid (Named PDR111, length = 11,8 kb). Transformed culture i named it W1 Transformant. After the transformation being done, I isolated the plasmid with Geneaid Presto Mini Plasmid Kit and i had done electrophoresis after i got the isolated plasmid. The results will be displayed, PDR111 is my plasmid before reconstruction (circular) as a negative control. As you can see, the band from transformed product seems to be nicked or linear. Does its mean that my transformation success? Because my supervisor told me that isolated plasmid from Presto Kit usually circular. Is it possible that my transformation product be nicked/linear plasmid? Please answer me, thank you
Maybe someone knows why this happens. The situation is that after PCR purification of gel products (cut one band), on the next electrophoresis, instead of one band, two bands appeared, how could this happen?
Hello, I want to do EMSA with native PAGE to check protein-dna interactions.
The PIs of my proteins are between 8.1-8.5. I know that the pH of my buffer must be higher, so that the net charge is negative and the protein goes "downwards" to the anode. But do I have to adjust the pH (e.g. let's say 9.5) of everything? So separating gel, running buffer and loading dye? Or is the gel enough? I cannot find anything about running buffer and loading dye.
I my group we only did discontinous native gels so far, but in all recipes the pH of the stacking gel is around 6.8. Then my protein would run out of the gel, wouldn't it? Can I also change the pH of the stacking gel without changing the purpose of the stacking gel? I also found continuous native gels on the internet. Does that really work without getting a big smear?
I was wondering if the routinely used NativePAGE sample buffer with a pH of 6.8 causes protein precipitation if my protein has a pI of 7? Could I increase the buffer pH without affecting the electrophoresis? Thanks a lot for your help.
I have a problem with conventional PCR electrophoresis, we are analyzing the deletion of ccr5 delta 32. And this material started to cause problems recently, there was no change in the protocol and before it worked normally. All reagents have already been changed, we are using conventional master mix.
What can it be?
After performing PCR, I ran electrophoresis, but on agarose the results showed some rather blurred samples. I wanted to know the cause and how to fix this situation. Please note that the chemicals and dyes are normal because the positive control shows a clear band.
I want to perform a western-blotting experiment after blue-native electrophoresis, but I couldn't find a proper prestained protein ladder to indicate protein size as well as good transfer, so what methods are used to determine protein size in those existing papers?
I found to use a wrong secondary Ab for my WB when I visualized it with ECL, can I wash with TBST for several times and incubate the right secondary Ab? Another question is why my bands are not flat? What is wrong with my electrophoresis? Thanks!
I loaded the DNA with its respective buffer load in one lane. Then, in the other lane I loaded the molecular weight marker and ran the electrophoresis. When I do the disclosure in the transilluminator I cannot observe the bands in any lane.
I’m currently working on the synthesis of aptamers through SELEX and the technique I’m using for converting dsDNA to ssDNA is asymmetric PCR, however when performing PAGE Denaturing electrophoresis, I cannot see any product bands, just the primer, why is that? for the asymmetric PCR I use only FAM reverse primer 1uM.
Colleagues, tell me which dye is optimal for staining RNA during gel electrophoresis? Which one do you use in your laboratory?
Hello, so, i just did a protein denaturation at 45ºC for 45 minutes in a thermal cycler for an electrophoresis for a posterior western blot. The problem is that i fu*** up the gels when i was about to load them, and now, because of the time, i'll have to do the electrophoresis tomorrow, but my proteins are already denaturated (and now are saved in a fridge at -80ºC). What should i do tomorrow with them? I'm thinking about denaturing them again because i think they might renature, but i'm not totally sure.
Thanks for any help and your time.
:(
If yes, then how can I interpret the results?
If yes, then how can I interpret the results?
In this electrophoresis , i'm using serum samples without any treatment, mixing them with sample buffer in a 1:1 ratio. Te run is performed at 150v for 1 Hour, an this is the result after staining.Has anyone experienced a similar situation? do you have any recomendations? Thank you.
What is the best way to clean the electrophoresis apparatus in order to proceed with mass spectrometry?
Hi, I'm a 2nd year student in biomedical science and currently writing a lab report for which I need to measure DNA band sizes on electrophoresis. The lane for PCR amplified DNA has a very thick bright band that i am not sure how to measure or how to interpret. This is the results given by our professor, not the ones we generated in our practical class so I don't think it's because the wells weren't loaded properly or some error like that (unless they're trying to trick us).
Sorry if it's a stupid question my brain is very tired right now.
It's lane 5 on the image
why during electrophoresis DNA bands that have reached the positive pole move back to the negative pole when without pcr
On electroforesis result, there was a spesific band but always have smears on it
I can see marker bands on my 1% agarose gel but no sample bands. What's weird is I can see fluorescent in loading wells although no sample bands are visible, seems like my sample was clogged into loading wells. Does anyone meet the same situation and know how to deal with it? My sample is just ~1,500 bp and I'm pretty sure the direction of the current of electrophoresis is correct.
I only used 2 wells of 12-well gel for my first electrophoresis. Can I reuse the remaining wells at the end of this electrophoresis? Could the gelred dye in the gel have been affected by the previous electrophoresis? In my view, the dye molecule cannot move without binding with DNA, so I can use the free well one more time. But someone told me I should turn around the gel if I wanna use it one more time to avoid the influence on gelred dye after the first electrophoresis.
I have run multiple agarose gels in which I have at least two combs.
I continually see the lower part of the gel visualising much fainter than the top portion.
The last band of my ladder (250 bp) often disappears. It is quite a problem as I often don't see faint bands in this area if I have loaded my PCR products in the lower portion of the gel.
See images attached - look especially at the ladders in the top vs bottom
In the one image you can see the gel itself after a run in the tank, where the loading dye is significantly lighter in the bottom portion than the top - so it's not a problem with the visualising equipment.
I have run the gel for different times (30-60 min) as well as at different voltages (100V vs 120V) and see the same.
The TAE buffer has been changed
I have observed the same with another gel tank.
The intercalating dye, SBYR Safe, has been replaced with a new aliquot.
Other individuals have also experienced the same issue
I cut a vector that already contain the promoter using BstBI enzyme. The electrophoresis gel result showed that no different between control and vector+plasmid cut BstBI enzyme. There are more than 1 band found in the gel. Does anyone have any idea why it is this way?
I am in the process of conducting an electrophoresis and I have a Safer dye at my disposal. However, I am uncertain whether it would be more suitable to combine the Safer dye with the 6X DNA LOADING Buffer. Would it be advisable to include the Safer dye in the loading DNA buffer mixture before incorporating it into the DNA sample? Or is such a procedure unnecessary?
Strain: Sphingomonas, Gram negative
The organisms were harvested during the logarithmic growth period and centrifuged at low temperature to remove the medium.Extraction of RNA revealed bands of abnormal size, no band at 23s, but two very close bands near 16s, and electrophoresis results showed no degradation.
I would like to ask if anyone has encountered this?
Thanks for looking and replying!
DNA amplification and electrophoresis, the target band was not as expected, the fragment was recovered and re-amplified with the same primers, and the correct size band appeared, but the recovered fragment was ligated into the vector and picked for cloning for Bacteria Liquid PCR, and fragment larger than the expected size was amplified (?). . I am no longer able to answer such a situation with my current knowledge, does anyone know what went wrong?
Usually, I use a time of 120 minutes and 120 V, but I am testing and standardizing new primers and I realized that perhaps the sample might have run off the gel. I would like to know if you use any protocol considering base pairs to decide on the time and voltage.
I prepared TAE for running electrophoresis and would like more information about how long of an expiration period I can consider.
Is it possible that the amplification failure products can be visualized in electrophoresis? Due to the failed amplification results it shows bands in my electrophoresis with bands that are quite clear. My amplification curve clearly shows amplification failure, but when I look back at it with electrophoresis there are some obvious bands, how is that possible?
During the electrophoresis run on a 1% agarose gel at 100 volts for 25 minutes, I was unable to clearly visualize the expected 28S and 18S bands representing ribosomal RNA. Instead, a smear-like pattern appeared on the gel. The ladder was run correctly, indicating that the gel and electrophoresis setup were functioning properly.
To provide context, I measured the concentration of my total RNA using a nanodrop spectrophotometer, which yielded a reading of 2.07 in A260/A280. The concentration was determined to be 1352 ng/μl, and for the gel analysis, I loaded 3 μl of RNA with 1 μl of loading buffer and only 3 ul Ladder.
Considering these results, I am unsure about the integrity of my total RNA and whether the observed smear is indicative of degradation or other factors affecting the sample quality. I am reaching out to this esteemed community in the hopes that someone with experience in RNA electrophoresis can offer insights into potential causes for the observed smear and absence of distinct 28S and 18S bands.
If nanodrop facility is not available, can we predict the dna conc. from the electrophoresis picture?
Molecular weight of my protein of interest is 7KDa. I am not able to get this on 18% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. I want to do western blotting of my samples having this. Kindly suggest the method to separate the low molecular wt protein and western blotting of it.
Thank you
I want to do MALDI-TOF mass for my protein. For its procedure I need to do bis tris electrophoresis of immunoprecipitated protein, then excise protein band. For running bis tris electrophoresis, I need to solve my protein in LDS sample buffer, but I think that would i replace SDS with LDS in this buffer? Is it too different for doing mass spect?
When purifying my DNA amplicons, I need to excise my DNA of interest from my gel (1.2% agarose).
I've observed that the DNA is distributed top and bottom of the thickness. Out of curiosity, I've done some research into why, but I can't find it. Does anyone have the answer?
How do I analyse the gel result I have obtained from an SDS-PAGE electrophoresis?
I did several times gel agarose electrophoresis to find the best N/P ratio of chitosan/tRNA polyplex. I don't know why I could not observe the tRNA in the well of gel agarose electrophoresis and the whole gel matrix? Even there is no smearing.
Would you please help me to interpret my result?
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Hey everyone. I need to mark LC3 protein, which has 16-14 kDa. When I do a 14% gel for the electrophoresis after the 20 kDa, my gel bands stay wavy (as shown in the photo) so it is not possible to get the protein.
Has anyone experienced this and could give some advice?
Good afternoon! We are trying to do bisulfite conversion in a new way and we want to evaluate DNA integrity after bisulfite conversion by agarose gel electrophoresis. For tests, we use 5 µg of mouse liver DNA. At the output, we get a concentration of 50 ng/µl. For electrophoresis, we take 4 µl of converted DNA bisulfite. We use 1% agarose gel, 1x TAE buffer and ethidium bromide okara. The duration of electrophoresis is 1 hour at a voltage of 120. After electrophoresis, a five-minute incubation on an ice bath enabled partial hybridization and visualization of the DNA. But we don't see any bands. Perhaps someone can tell what we are doing wrong?
When the PCR product was electrophoresed, such a band was visible and smear was seen under the band.
Cycle conditions were (1) 94.0°C for 3 min, (2) 94.0°C for 10 sec, (3) 55.0°C for 10 sec, (4) 72.0°C for 7 sec, (5) 72.0°C for 1 min, and (6) 20.0°C for 10 min.
The number of cycles is 40 cycles from (2) to (4).
The swimming time was 15 min.
Gels were 3% agarose gels.
I would like to know what causes such smears and how to improve them.
We did comet assay based on joves protocol. Under fluorescence microscope, cells were visible but without tail. The drugs showed toxicity when grown in 6-well plate. Lysis was done for overnight at 4 degree celsius. Electrophoresis was run at 25V, 300mA for 30mins.
Electrophoresis separation protein
Hello,
I'm doing a SOE PCR. As soon as the PCR is done, I run electrophoresis of the samples. The gel shows the marker but no sample, as if I didn't load the sample with the loading buffer. But then, I run again the same samples in the same electrophoresis chamber with the same conditions and it shows results. What can it be? This happened to me 4 times, and I'm losing my mind. I couldn't find any answers.
Looking in to alternatives for Etbr for our DNA electrophoresis. I've done some research on GelRed and Sybersafe but I've been hearing conflicting reviews. I'd like some insight in to other labs and their results. Is green dye better than red? Are you seeing bleeding? All insight is welcomed.
Thank you.
Hello,
I am trying to use the Quiaxcel advanced capillary electrophoresis system for fragment analysis of PCR products that have been cut with a restriction enzyme.
I dissolve my ladder (size marker) in PCR buffer, Restriction enzyme buffer (containing BSA) and EDTA in similar concentrations to the ones in which my samples are dissolved. However, doing this the resolution of the ladder is not clear and I can't see the expected peaks in my samples.
Does anyone knows if any of the buffers I am using influence the electrophoretic run, or does anyone that has used the machine before has any suggestions?
Thanks a lot!
I´m haveing trouble with some samples I´m trying to determine Serpina 5 content by ELISA assay. I´m using a comercial strip kit.
With my director we are starting to think the protein is forming some kind of agregate that is blocking the recognition site for the antibodye or something like that, so we were thinking of doing a cracking step, like in denaturing electroforesis, to the samples before diluting for the assay.
Is this posible? has someone done it and can share your experience?
Thanks a lot for any help you can give!
Actually, I'm working on an RNA extraction kit, but due to an unknown reason, I'm not getting the desired result. Although, some bands appear on MOPS-Formaldehyde gel (smear-like) but didn't get results on the normal gel (Agarose gel).
I was working on vertical electrophoresis using polyacrylamide gel to separate DNA fragments, but I have encountered different problems, so I need your technical advice to resolve my problems.
The first problem is that the polyacrylamide solution takes a very long time to polymerize or solidify in the plate. I used 50ml polyacrylamide solution per plate by mixing 13.3ml (30% acrylamide bisacrylamide), 10ml (10x TBE), 0.350ml (10% ASP), 26.35ml (water) and 5µl (TEMED).
The second problem is that migrating DNA form a parabola shape after moving halfway from the well. So it ultimately gives the band of different sizes (those expected to be the same size).
The third problem is that the obtained band was not bold enough for scoring. I used ethidium bromide for staining the gel after electrophoresis.
Hello
I think about tool can automatically interpretate my hemoglobin electrophoresis diagram
Is this exist or applicable ?
I am doing PCR-RFLP to detect SNP, after the restriction enzyme digestion I check with 15% polyacrylamide gel, if the restriction occurs I should see two bands (126 and 20bp) but I only see the 126bp band, what could I be doing wrong or how do I solve it?