Economics - Science topic

Muñoz, Lucio, 2019. From Traditional Markets to Green Markets: A Look at Markets Under Perfect Green Market Competition, Weber Economics & Finance (ISSN:2449-1662), Vol. 7 (1) 2019, Article ID wef_253, 1147-1156

How feasibly can I pay a senior academic to review my independent research, then award me a certificate for my independent research?

In recent years, the development of digitization and Internetization of the economy has accelerated. These processes in particular Digitization and Internetization of the economy are now occurring simultaneously in many areas of economic processes, in the functioning of business entities and public, financial and other institutions operating in economies that are increasingly becoming knowledge-based economies. The Covid-19 pandemic has further accelerated the processes of digitization and Internetization of the economy. More and more companies and enterprises operating in various industries and sectors of the economy are expanding their operations via the Internet, remotely providing their services and selling their products through e-commerce.

The development of information processing technologies in the era of the current Fourth Technological Revolution is determined by the development and growth of the applications of ICT, Internet technologies and advanced data processing technologies Industry 4.0. The current technological revolution associated with the concept of Industry 4. 0 is motivated by the development of such technologies as: Big Data Analytics, Data Science, cloud computing, machine learning, multi-layer artificial neural networks-based deep learning, generative artificial intelligence, personal and industrial Internet of Things, Business Intelligence analytics, autonomous robots, horizontal and vertical data system integration, multi-criteria simulation models, digital twins, Blockchain, smart technologies, cyber security instruments, augmented and virtual reality, and other technologies for advanced multi-criteria processing of large sets of data and information.

The processes of digitalization and Internetization of the economy are determined by “upstream” processes, i.e., those inspired by public institutions, including computerization, Internetization of public offices, and “downstream” determinants, i.e., e.g., the growth of e-commerce, the increase in the share of transactions and payments made electronically via the Internet, the development of Internet banking and the shift of a significant part of business in many companies to remote service conducted via the Internet.

In the future, due to the development of applications of Industry 4.0 technologies, including the ever-improving generative artificial intelligence, the employment of people in certain types of professions, occupations in certain industries and sectors of the economy may significantly decline. It is likely that significant declines in employment in some branches and sectors of the knowledge economy will occur in the next few years. There are many indications that in a few years the scale of applications of generative artificial intelligence in various areas of production processes and services provided will increase strongly. On the other hand, the development of applications of constantly improving generative artificial intelligence and other Industry 4.0 technologies will also create new jobs in analytical and research fields. However, just a few years ago, the prevailing thesis was that the scale of job losses would be much greater than the new jobs being created. In a period of rapid technological advances in recent years in the development of generative artificial intelligence technology and its applications, the emerging new jobs in which generative AI technologies are used is the aforementioned thesis begins to lose its relevance. In this regard, it is not out of the question that the number of new jobs and professions being created may fully manage the potentially emerging gap of lack of employment generated by AI technology replacing human labor. Regardless of the nature of the changes in labor markets that will result from the implementation of new Industry 4.0 technologies into various fields of business activities of companies and enterprises, it is certain that the impact on labor markets will be significant and substantial in the years to come.

I have described the key issues of opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies in my article below:

OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT

And the applications of Big Data technologies in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management were described in my co-authored article:

APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIZATION

I invite you to familiarize yourself with the issues described in the publications given above, and to scientific cooperation in these issues.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this topic?

What do you think about this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The field of economics is undergoing a transformation, with machine learning (ML) playing a pivotal role in reshaping how researchers, policymakers, and organizations understand and respond to complex economic phenomena. From analyzing vast datasets to predicting market trends, machine learning is becoming a cornerstone of modern economic analysis.

Economics has traditionally relied on statistical models to explain relationships between variables. However, as economies grow more complex and datasets expand in size and diversity, traditional methods often struggle to capture the intricacies of economic behavior. This is where machine learning excels.

Machine learning algorithms can handle nonlinear relationships, detect hidden patterns, and make accurate predictions, even with high-dimensional data. These capabilities make ML ideal for addressing challenges like forecasting economic indicators, analyzing consumer behavior, and detecting financial fraud.

1. Predictive Analytics

Machine learning is revolutionizing economic forecasting. Models such as decision trees, random forests, and neural networks can predict GDP growth, unemployment rates, and stock market trends with higher accuracy by leveraging vast amounts of historical and real-time data.

2. Market Analysis and Consumer Behavior

E-commerce platforms and businesses use ML to analyze purchasing patterns, segment customers, and predict demand. In economics, these insights help inform pricing strategies and market regulations.

3. Financial Market Insights

ML techniques, such as sentiment analysis on news and social media, help economists gauge investor sentiment. These insights, combined with predictive models, aid in identifying potential market disruptions and optimizing investment portfolios.

4. Policy Impact Assessment

Machine learning models can simulate the impact of policy changes on various economic indicators. For instance, ML can predict how tax reforms or subsidies will influence employment, inflation, or consumer spending.

5. Fraud Detection

Economic activities, particularly in finance, are susceptible to fraudulent practices. Machine learning algorithms, especially anomaly detection models, are used to identify suspicious transactions and patterns in financial systems, ensuring stability and security.

While the potential of machine learning in economics is vast, several challenges remain:

The intersection of machine learning and economics is still in its early stages, but its potential is immense. Future developments might include:

Muñoz, Lucio, 2017. If Going From Free Markets to Free Markets Is the Science Based Approach: What is Then the Model Structure, Price Structure, Choice Structure and the Knowledge Structure and Related Gaps of the 2012 Paradigm Shift From Perfect Traditional Market to Perfect Green Market Thinking?, In: International Journal of Research & Development Organisation(IJRDO), ISSN: 2455-6661, Vol. 3, Issue 1, January, Pp.70-90., India.

I would like to research on Monopoly markets in Maldives - for example would STELCO (State Electric Company) fit into Monopoly market structure? If so what sources can i refer to for research?

I am a new student to the study of Business Economics and Economics itself so i would appreciate help, thank you!

Call for papers: As an annual conference held successfully in the past 9 years, 2025 10th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2025) will be held in Tianjin on January 03-05, 2025.

大会官网(投稿网址）：https://ais.cn/u/F7FNVz

大会时间：2025年1月3-5日

大会地点：中国-天津

提交检索：CPCI，CNKI，Google Scholar

见刊出版：会议论文集出版（快见刊）

*含online线上见刊链接、纸质刊物、DOI号、ISSN（刊号）、ISBN（书号）、Vol（卷号）

主办单位：天津财经大学

第十届金融创新与经济发展国际学术会议（ICFIED 2025）将于2025年1月3-5日在中国天津市召开。会议主要围绕金融创新与经济发展等研究领域展开讨论。会议旨在为从事金融创新与经济发展研究的专家学者、工程技术人员、技术研发人员提供一个共享科研成果和前沿技术，了解学术发展趋势，拓宽研究思路，加强学术研究和探讨，促进学术成果产业化合作的平台。大会诚邀国内外高校、科研机构专家、学者，企业界人士及其他相关人员参会交流。

经济学理论

微观/宏观经济学

企业管理

项目管理

市场营销

人力资源管理

财务管理

运营管理

战略管理

信息管理

组织行为学

贸易经济学

计量经济学

金融创新经济发展

金融学

货币银行学

证券投资学

公司金融学

税收学

......

所有的投稿都必须经过2-3位组委会专家审稿，经过严格的审稿之后，最终所录用的论文将以会议论文集的形式在Atlantis Press旗下的AEBMR-Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (ISSN: 2352-5428)出版，见刊后将提交至CPCI、知网CNKI、谷歌学术进行检索。目前该出版社见刊周期短，知网&谷歌学术检索快速稳定。

1、作者参会：一篇录用且缴费的文章允许一名作者免费参会；

2、主讲嘉宾：申请主题演讲，由组委会审核；

3、口头演讲：申请口头报告，时间为10分钟；

4、海报展示：申请海报展示，A1尺寸；

5、听众参会：不投稿仅参会，也可申请演讲及展示。

6、报名参会：https://ais.cn/u/F7FNVz

In a world of environmentally dirty markets, how we treat the pollution problem determines the nature of each market and its structure, which raises the question: Can you see the similarities and differences between Pollution production markets, Pollution reduction markets, and Pollution management markets?

Think about it, what do you think?

Zimbabwe's economy is unique in that volatile and unpredictable so do such technologies apply in such an economy?

Have you read this article?

You read current ACADEMIC PAPERS on sustainability written like if the concept never existed before despite being available with just a simple RESEARCHGATE SEARCH OR ACADEMIA SEARCH OR GOOGLE SEARCH since before and after WCED 1987 called for moving away from business as usual. Ignoring the past to advance concepts as new is not consistent with Thomas Kuhn's paradigm evolution loop. And this raises the question, Is the current sustainability research agenda in support of business as usual based on academic tunneling?

I think Yes, what do you think?

Here some good food for thoughts!

Does the use of theory or theories mandatory in social science research including economics and business administration areas?

Dear Valuable Scientists,

"Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 2nd International Symposium on Political Science and Public Administration" will be held in Tekirdağ on 28-29/November/2024, ONLINE. The theme of the symposium was determined as "Climate Change and Sustainable Future".

We are first of all expecting an Abstract with the format

Then o 10 minutes youtube video presentation

Then we will give you the participation certificate and book of abstracts

And also after the video presentation evaluation we will suggest to invite you to our Scentific Comitee member with the Certificate

The symposium aims to bring together scientists and researchers from different countries from Political Science and Public Administration discipline, to create a platform that will enable them to present their studies, and to share their knowledge and collaborate nationally and internationally. A detailed information about the program is announced on the official website: https://iibfsempozyum.nku.edu.tr/SempozyumHakk%C4%B1ndaSiyaset/0/s/21993/29425

- Peer-reviewed

- Proceedings PDF with ISBN will be published

- Symposium will be held only ONLINE

- No submission fees required.

- Submit your abstracts or full text papers : sbkycongress@gmail.com

Climate Change and Sustainable Future

Abstract submission deadline: 1 October 2024

Symposium Date: 25 October 2024

· Sustainability

· Climate Change

· Climate Change Politics

· Political Economy

· Circular Economy

· Food Policies

· Gender Studies

· Political Communication

· Urban/Local Politics

· Social Policy

· Urban Planning

· Local Governments

· Urbanization Policy

· Smart Cities

· Sustainable Development

· Political Ecology

· Environmental Management

· Natural Resources and Environmental Economics

· Urban Policy

· E-government

· Disaster Management

· Technology and Innovation Management

· Political philosophy

· History of Political Thought

· International Politics

· Political Sociology

I am working on Industrialization in a State of India. It covers industrial development, industrial policy and regional disparities (disparities in terms of industry) of Uttar Pradesh. The study will be based on secondary data which will be taken from MoSPI, the Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES) of Uttar Pradesh and other secondary sources. It will use ASI data, income data and data on infrastructure (State and Central).

I intend to employ Action Research Method as a Methodology for my research.

I studied in a book and found that "Action research is done in most of all the business and industrial unit to find the solution of local problem". I went thru the available literature on the industry but did not get a single study that did use action research method as a research methodology in the industry. I found some research in Education that used action research method.

I am searching literature that used action research method in the industry. Please suggest me some literature. (any study at Regional, National and International levels.)

--

Raghavendra

The current trend appearing to have come from nowhere in 2024 promoting economic circularity to solve a sustainability problem embedded in it is mind boggling, which leads to the question: If a linearly polluting society is not sustainable, how can a circularity polluting society be sustainable?

Perhaps someone promoting economic circularity can explain

Note:

This question is academic, not political.

1. World Order has shown changes, especially after 2020 in almost all major fields of Politics, Economics, Social, Geopolitical etc.

2. Where the world order in real is diverting?

3. What will be the ultimate outcomes?

4. The alteration & changes of systems on Earth will change anything in Space?

5. Which systems will lose centuries-long grounds and what new will rise?

6. Is the current scenario being same as the Rise/Fall of Nations, Games of Thrones etc. or there is something significantly different this time?

7. Ultimately what impact will the Next World Order make on the entire human race and especially on the Bio-sphere?

8. How much was any World Order got impacted/formed/shaped through/by religious education directly/indirectly and why did such neuroplasticity/mind exercises base practices remain an integral part of World Orders in past? Can humans afford to continue past practices to build any new future?

9. What changes do you suggest in Next World Order, and Why?

10. Are Human going to accept defeat & surrender in front of Alien powers like gods, AIs, energy, any other life forms etc.?

11. How long more humans have the current status of rapidly shrinking freedom?

12. Will the current form of human life exist after such surrenders and what will be the expected shape of any of such life?

13. Its understood that human have to sacrifice current systems and life forms for existence, but, Is it necessary? Any workable solutions ?

Since 1987 we have been trying to solve a sustainability issue like the eco-economic development issue through sustainable development means, a theory-practice inconsistency, so not surprise the social and environmental sustainability issues the Brundtland Commission highlighted then to be addressed are in worse state today,,,,Pollution still increasing and the sustainability problem more acute.

If the price distortions embedded in Adam Smith's traditional market model thinking are not addressed head on, the Thomas Kuhn.s paradigm evolution loop suggest that the worsening of the environmental abnormalities embedded fully in the traditional market thinking and partially in dwarf green market thinking will push the environmentally patched business as usual model towards collapse, which raises the question: Does the Thomas Kuhn's paradigm evolution loop predicts the future collapse of dwarf green markets?

I think yes, what do you think?

Would workers desire labor unions less if Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs guided distributing an economic basis for each individual? How? Why?

On the packaging of anti-products, products that are harmful to health, stimulants such as cigarettes, there is information warning the citizens of consumers about the harmfulness to health of smoking cigarettes. If citizens have succeeded, through activists in NGOs and some political circles, in lobbying for compulsory information on the harmfulness to health, the risk of developing lung cancer and other diseases resulting from smoking, cigarettes, why analogous solutions still do not work for other types of anti-products and harmful stimulants, including stimulants to which one can easily become addicted. Besides, one of the most negative aspects of using some other stimulants is causing car accidents after drinking and driving. Many fatal car accidents are caused after taking intoxicating stimulants such as alcohol and, for example, some painkillers, tranquilizers and the like. So why is it that the packaging of these drugs and their advertisements do not warn about the negative consequences of their improper use.

Analogous is the issue of the problem of emissivity, i.e. the emission of CO2, methane and other greenhouse gases and environmental pollution by waste emitted during the production process that is harmful to human health and the state of the biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems. After all, it has been known for years that greenhouse gas emissions generated by production and other economic processes are a major factor in the realized greenhouse effect of the planet's atmosphere since the beginning of the first industrial revolution and the increasingly rapid process of global warming. Many citizens, with a view to the future of their children's and grandchildren's livelihoods in the future of the next decades of time, would probably choose among highly substitutable products and/or services those whose production process involves lower levels of greenhouse gas emissions and/or lower emissions of polluting wastes that are harmful to human health and to the state of the biosphere and biodiversity. Apparently, the activities of pro-social, pro-environmental and pro-climate non-governmental organizations and activist organizations carrying out pro-social, pro-environmental and/or pro-climate activities are too weak in the face of lobbying by business, industrial corporations, many companies and enterprises that can afford to finance election campaigns of political parties pursuing their business interests.

I am conducting research on this issue. I have included the conclusions of my research in the following article:

I invite you to get acquainted with the issues described in the publications given above and to scientific cooperation in these issues.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Heuristically, I suppose people consider films more successful the greater the return on investment(ROI). Stimuli: ”Successful films are often based on classics due to relatability and interest”(Ohnemus 2023). “My film career was and is perhaps successful despite my lack of technical skills. Arts have both applications and fundamentals”(Ohnemus 2023). Source:

This is the age-old question about what an ideal society would be. Is such an ideal even possible?

This question was inspired from the debate on the question, "Could societies exist without a way to transfer value (i.e., without money or a barter system)?" (https://www.researchgate.net/post/Could_societies_exist_without_a_way_to_transfer_value_ie_without_money_or_a_barter_system/7). I recommend checking out this discussion first.

1)

2)

I ask because such an irrational situation exists in the country where I operate. In my opinion, in a situation of rising energy prices and the need to accelerate the processes of green transformation of the economy, the shutdown of power plants based on photovoltaic panels by the large dominant power companies that produce energy mainly from the combustion of coal and lignite other sources of energy, including mainly the cheapest and emission-free production of electricity, not adopting a periodic increase in energy production generated from the sun and wind, so as not to reduce energy production from dirty, high-emission coal-burning power plants is not moral, socially and environmentally ethical, not in line with sound climate policy and not in line with human rights. The key problem with climate, environmental and energy policy is that it is not conducted fairly. Instead, it is conducted haphazardly, shortsightedly, unstrategically and is politicized in the negative sense of the word. Despite the fact that most of the mining sector, coal and lignite mines, companies in the energy sector and the country's largest fuel and energy company, which holds more than 90 percent of the domestic market share in the sale of motor fuels, are state-owned companies and could carry out in an efficient, comprehensive and strategic manner the process of green energy transition, they unfortunately do not do so. There are many indications that climate, environmental and energy policies are being conducted haphazardly and short-sightedly. The full synergy and correlation that should occur between these policies is missing. Unfortunately, economic aspects are also not key, as they are mixed with political aspects, in which the economic calculus is not treated as a principled factor, and this is in addition to the high level of indebtedness of the state's public finance system and the growing level of the budget deficit in the central state budget. The government has pledged to implement the green transformation of the economy in accordance with the European Union's Green Deal plan. The country receives subsidies from the European Union for the implementation of this plan, including subsidies from the National Reconstruction Plan, which should be allocated mainly to efficiently carried out green investments to carry out the green transformation of the energy industry and achieve the goal of building a sustainable, emission-free energy industry in the shortest possible time. However, this is not happening. Onshore wind power development is still administratively and normatively largely restricted. On sunny, cloudless days and when the wind is blowing, additional energy is generated from already installed photovoltaic panels and wind farms, which is not collected from prosumers by large power companies due to unsuitable transmission networks. Besides, the dominant power companies in the market do not collect clean energy from the mentioned RES sources in order not to reduce the production of energy generated by the conventional method of burning coal and lignite. In addition, the dominant energy companies are lobbying in the political sphere to restrict the development of RES and are causing restrictions on the process of issuing permits for citizens to make further connections to the power grid of prosumer wind turbines and/or photovoltaic installations built by citizens. In addition, there is another extension of the start of construction and implementation of the project to build the first nuclear power plant in a country where the energy industry still relies 3/4 on conventional energy production, i.e. on the basis of burning fossils, much of which is imported, there are situations of energy shortages and eggs to buy from abroad, and the quality of air due to the dominance of combustion energy in the heating season is among the worst in Europe. On the basis of my research, I conclude that this activity is immoral, socially and environmentally unethical, does not comply with climate policy and is not compatible with human rights. Confirmation of the aforementioned thesis is provided by the results of the research I described in my publications given below.

In the following article, I have included the results of the research conducted on the connection of the issue of sustainable development, the genesis and meaning of the Sustainable Development Goals, the essence of sustainable development in the context of social, normative, economic, environmental, climate, and human rights aspects, etc. The research also addressed the issue of key determinants of human existential security as an element of the concept of sustainable development.

HUMAN SECURITY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

I am conducting research on this issue. I have included the conclusions of my research in the following article:

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT AS A KEY ELEMENT OF THE PRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE ECONOMY TOWARDS GREEN ECONOMY AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY

The key issues of the problematic sources of Poland's exceptionally deep energy cross in 2022 are described in my co-authored article below:

POLAND'S 2022 ENERGY CRISIS AS A RESULT OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE AND YEARS OF NEGLECT TO CARRY OUT A GREEN TRANSFORMATION OF THE ENERGY SECTOR

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Generally life extension and anti-aging. A lower death rate cancels out a low birthrate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382049802_Correcting_Cell_Errors

It seems that since 2012 Rio +20 Conference, the world has been moving away from science based perfect market thinking, a moved that apparently has been helped by the confusion created by the 2012 green market paradigm shift avoidance move or the green market shift avoidance period 2012-2024, and this raises the question, Is science based on a political definition science?

What do you think? Yes, why? No, why not?

Since 1987 WCED report "Our Common Future" pollution has been increasing, not decreasing, as no pollution reduction markets have been set up yet to transition towards pollution-less markets, which raises the question: Why should we expect pollution management markets to lead us increasingly away and away from pollution-less markets?.

Any ideas to the why?

Note: If you understand the difference between how pollution management markets and pollution reduction markets in terms of pollution-less market transition friendliness work, you may be able to see why.

Most in researchgate may be familiar with concepts like golden paradigms and flawed paradigm and paradigm evolution, but what about the idea that links them all, which may lead to or be behind distorted knowledge based policy action.

And this makes the following question interesting based on a new term: What is a golden trojan paradigm?

What do you think? Why?

In my next papers I will focus on the fact that past development assumptions made affecting system stability have complicated policy correction and action in terms of system stability problems, like the assumption that market dynamics and population dynamics are independent factors affecting system stability.

What do you think?

1)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380427514_Kalergi_and_Hart-Cellerand_Memetics_White_Antifragility

2)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380904462_Maybe_I_lack_white_privilege_Do_Hapas_look_Scandinavian

Under perfect market paradigm shift avoidance, the responsibilities of governments and of corporations in development change, which raises the question: Under perfect market paradigm shift avoidance, who is to be blamed if social and/or environmental systems collapse, governments or corporations? Why?

Who do you think is to be blamed? And why do you think that is the case?

A short answer who and why is the best.

1)

2)

Hi fellows,

I am looking for two co-authors for a research project (50% done) that will be submitted to The 2024 15th International Conference on E-business, Management, and Economics (ICEME 2024, https://www.iceme.org/index.html). It is an excellent opportunity to come and visit China.

The topic's focus is Multinational Corporations (MCs), and the offer is valid until February 20th (11:59 pm, China time).

Difficulty getting published. More broadly maybe:

1) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373629748_The_Post-Eisenhower_and_Wagner_Effect

2)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372341739_Fundamental_Theorem_of_Calculus_proved_by_Wagner's_Law

Mansfield, Harvey. "Niccolò Machiavelli". Encyclopedia Britannica, 30 Apr. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Niccolo-Machiavelli. Accessed 8 May 2024.

1)The most consistent politicians don’t get to the highest office(President):

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Ron Paul". Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Apr. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ron-Paul. Accessed 8 May 2024.

McNamee, Gregory Lewis. "Bernie Sanders". Encyclopedia Britannica, 8 May. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bernie-Sanders. Accessed 8 May 2024.

2)Liberals correctly interpret authority as necessary evil thus, liberalism is the dominant ideology