Science topic

Discourse Studies - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Discourse Studies, and find Discourse Studies experts.
Questions related to Discourse Studies
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
4 answers
Hello everyone,
I am a student doing a systematic review as a master's dissertation. I came across an issue with a few papers I have included into my project. I need to do quality appraisal for all included studies, however, 3 of my papers are analytical discourse studies and I cannot find any relevant tool for this type of study design. Would anyone give me a hint how to process it? Or refer me to a useful source where to find information.
Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest you to use Corpus Linguistics tool as a method to analyse your discourses. Such as AntConc Application. You can search the tutorial from youtube.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
4 answers
Crismore et al. (1993) define metadiscourse as: "linguistic material in texts, written or spoken, which does not add anything to the propositional content but that is intended to help the listener or reader organize, interpret and evaluate the information."
Relevant answer
The spoken text expresses discourse and usage more than the written text, which can describe the discourse, not its pragmatic analysis, while all the discursive formats are clear from the written because it represents a continuous documented system
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
5 answers
Language/Discoure Understanding is a matter of language/discourse meaning seek and meaning demonstration. In language/discourse meaning treatment-based studies, Linguistics offers two basic sub-branches: Semantics and Pragmatics from Cognitive Science where Psychology, Psycholinguistics and Linguistics compete. Yet, sometimes if not often, there is not a clear cut between the two sub-branches and scholars happen to take one for the other or simply reject one. The problem is more complex when the target language/discourse of the study is a specialized one.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dilu,
In principle, there should be no confusion between semantics and pragmatics, which are not exclusive, i.e. semantics is in need of pragmatics and vice versa. Without pragmatics, semantics is decontextualized language that does not make real sense. And without semantics, pragmatics will not have the fodder on which it bases its own meaningful communicative substance. Semantics is the study of the knowledge encoded in the vocabulary of the language and in its patterns for building elaborate constructions and meanings. Pragmatics is the interaction of semantic knowledge with our knowledge of the world to produce meaningful communication in contexts of use. Psychology and socio-cultural considerations definitely impact and interact with pragmatics in the way we express ourselves in our respective languages and cultures.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
9 answers
Interpersonal or interactional metadiscourse was designed for the analysis of academic genres in English (Vande Kopple 1985, Crismore et al. 1993, Hyland & Tse 2004, Hyland 2005, 2008). The scope of texts being subject to this analysis has widened with time, including not only academic but also professional and social genres of different domains. The result of these analyses has challenged the general methodological framework, suggesting new perspectives that can develop it with theoretical and socio-linguistic implications (Suau Jiménez 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017). A re-framing of the model would possibly be necessary if we want it to cater for new research in a variety of genres, domains and languages. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Reza Biria,
Thank you for your answer and your interesting comments and files, some of which I already knew, especially Hyland and Tse (2004), which I have largely used in my own research and in my master's classes (www.uv.es/maes). It is true that the issues concerning the inner weakness of the model have been pointed out in a number of ways, but it is also true that, as far as I know, there haven't been serious theoretical or methodological proposals on how to tackle this problem. This is why I have posed the question here. As I said before, some colleagues and myself will hold a round table at the next CILC 2017 in Paris, where we'll attempt to pinpoint the problem taking into account our own research difficulties and results from different variables (corpus, genre, domain and language). We'll also try to reach some conclusions/proposals that can help further research. I would also like to refer you to the following file, which is my humble contribution to this matter so far. Once the round table is approved by the CILC committee I will announce it in this platform.
Best,
Francisca Suau-Jiménez
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
3 answers
I'm working on proximisation in the presidential address, applying Cap's (2013) theory. But I want to incorporate how speakers (presidents) negotiate access to addressees via cognitive. lexical and discourse  forms. 
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Maybe you can find some more ideas in this journal (it is bilingual  - Porteguese and English):
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
7 answers
Advantages vs. disadvantages between the two approaches? I've used discourse analysis before but am leaning towards using frame analysis in my next study. Grateful for any suggestions, advice or experiences shared. Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Helen,
first, I suppose we are talking about critical discourse analysis (CDA), not pure discourse analysis as it is used for linguistic analyses and, given that you study policies, you want to analyse content, not language. If I'm completely wrong and you wan to to study language, I apologize in advance :).
Anyway, for me (and mainly see CDA as it was posed by Teun van Dijk) frame analysis is actually a part of CDA - you can focus on analyzing the frames present in the selected discourse because discourse is formed mainly by frames, myths, narratives, metaphors, stereotypes etc., and if you want to deconstruct (symbolical) meanings in the discourse you have analyze mentioned artefacts.  So I wouldn't put such demarcation between two methods, in fact I would not put any demarcation at all. I will give some examples to support this claim. Frames, as some cognitive artefacts created to (strategically) simplify complex problems, are often used by media to represent some social events, actors and so on. Often, these frames have normative denotation or connotation that both contribute to creation of specific discourse: squatters are framed as social deviants who pose stability risk for society and medical risk for individuals; in neoliberal social policies unemployed are framed as lazy and incompetent individuals in order to discoursively stigmatize their social position. Of course, you can omit CDA and focus purely on frames, in that case the outcome of the study would be identified frames without discourse context.
As for (dis)advantages, I cannot see how to compare CDA and frame analysis in this regard because CDA is macro-analytical method and frame analysis rather micro-analytical method (frames would be always part of a discourse). Both are qualitative methods so they are analytically demanding and, personally, I cannot think about doing frame analysis or metaphor analysis without CAQDAS that provides a tool for systematic data analysis with regard to repeating themes (discoursive formations) from which coherent frames could be identified. For CDA and frame analysis I would suggest literally anything by Teun van Dijk, for sole framing, book Framing Public Life edited by Reese, Gandy and Grant is good (the book is focused on media framing but presented ideas and procedures are portable to any data, including policy papers). 
Hopefully, this was somewhat helpful :).
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
5 answers
I'm develop a discourse corpus which is used to support a discourse research. Now I am building a annotation system to annotate discourse structure(turn-taking). Is there any system that I can utilize ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Liu Rui, A system for the analysis of turns that cohere to form exchanges was developed by scholars of discourse analysis associated with English Language Research at University of Birmingham. It is reported in Chapters 4,5 & 6 of Coulthard and Montgomery (eds) (1981/2014) Studies in Discourse Analysis. Unfortunately, I don't have a soft copy but it is available in a Kindle edition:
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
9 answers
What are the most salient theories for diglossic code switching, other than that of Mayers-scotton?
Relevant answer
Answer
Which of Myers-Scotton's theories are you referring to? Since you mention 'diglossic' code-switching and this refers to high- and low-status languages or varieties, I would assume that you are referring to her social theories of markedness and rational actors, outlined in Myers-Scotton (1993), Social motivations for code switching. If so I would agree with the above reply suggesting Garcia's translanguaging, and would also recommend Pennycook and Makoni's (2007) Disinventing and reconstituting languages, and the state-of the-art overview of code switching research in Gardner-Chloros's 2009 book Code-switching.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
7 answers
I would also appreciate works that critique this view of context.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Onwu,
Widdowson's "Text, Context, Pretext" might be helpful for you insofar Widdowson's book provides a critical engagement with Critical Discourse Analysis. He discusses in depth various ways of understanding and defining "context".
Regards,
Ingmar
P.S. By way of advertising my own work, if I may, I like to point you to a paper in which I sketch an approach to ethnographic and postconstructivist discourse analysis which allows for studying text and context and their politics empirically, without the need to imagine some "normative conditions" that are actually out of scope of the study.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
5 answers
Dear All,
I am working on a research study on reading discourse problems in an EFL context in Pakistan. I would like to review and adapt a questionnaire survey suiting my research objectives. I will be highly thankful if anyone provide some samples of questionnaire survey of reading discourse problems at intermediate level.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Sheeraz Ali,
Focusing on discourse problems first requires paying attention to pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic levels of discourse. In the former, we focus on surface features of text or texture such as diexes, metadiscourse markers, thematic progression and so on. In the latter, however, we should address the intercultural, socioideological and suprasentential elements governing language use. Therefore based on related theories, you should pinpoint the domains and sub-domains defining the problems you want to address. Then, create a number of prompts, usually thirty to fifty, which constitute the pool of the items you need to make the questionnaire.Afterwards, you should ensure that the instrument is both valid and reliable. This can be materialized by consulting colleagues and by pilot testing. In this way you can develop your own data collecting tool. You can further increase the dependability of the data by triangulating the questionnaire by using a follow- up group focused interview. I used the recepie from a book by Zoltan Dornyei (2003) and the outcome was amazing.
Wish you lots of good luck with your research.
Best regards,
R. Biria
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
6 answers
I think the rhetorical positionings of person deixis (I/you and exclusive we/ inclusive we) are predictable and over-flogged
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Akin Adetunji,
I'd suggest you the two following volumes:
- Duszak, Anna (ed.). 2002. Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula  (ed.) Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, Benjamins.
Best wishes,
Carla Bazzanella
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
3 answers
I am already aware of research concerning story grammar and other structural models, and of scales that compare film vignettes for their ability to evoke certain emotions, but have not found any scales that compare film vignettes structurally, so that one might use them interchangeably over time with the same participants. The scale (or other measure) needs to provide as much assurance as possible that the film vignettes are equivalent as stimuli for discourse production. Any leads would be greatly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Tom,
Thanks for sending the article reference. I'll have a look to see if it's applicable.
Rick Welland
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
9 answers
It is very difficult to accurately specify the theories underpinning CDA. Into the bargain, problematization of events and realities as the epicenter this discipline,presumably  without a precise theoretical background,  has created misgivings among some scholars . I'd be delighted and elated to to receive your reflections and thoughts on this significant quandary . 
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't see why. To start from a real-world problem and develop a theory from attempts to solve it seems acceptable to me. cf. Newton 'theorizing' gravity to explain why an apple falls to earth. Where CDA has had its detractors (e.g. Prof. Widdowson) in the past has been because of the tendency of its practitioners to start from a problem close to their hearts and, because of that emotional involvement, compromise their ideal academic 'scientific' neutrality, skewing their interpretations for political/ideological reasons. In science, to be emotionally involved in an outcome is usually bad. Much as I like CDA, especially the earlier stuff, I'm not sure how satisfactorily they have answered this objection...
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
11 answers
Is this epideictic discourse rather than deliberative one? Or are the two types mixted according to Aristotle's harmony of rhetorical genres?
Relevant answer
Answer
There is a genre continuum in film reviews between clearly deliberative ones and clearly epideictic ones. Ordinary moviegoers tend to treat reviews as a tool for deliberation. Thus most user created reviews you find online have a quite explicit deliberative slant.
At the other extreme professional film critics, film theory scholars, aspiring film philosophers and general film-nerds-with-way-too-much-time-on-their-hands will be on the epideictic side.
Audience design plays an important role in deciding whether the discourse is epideictic or deliberative. The film theory scholar or dilettante largely speaks to people who share her/his enthusiasm for cinema and are supposed to have watched the movie (and the countless other obscure movies that are cited in the review). The run-of-the-mill online review addresses people who have to decide whether the movie is worth watching. Explicit preoccupation with "spoilers" is a clear sign of this audience design and of a deliberative function.
Professional reviewers writing for newspapers and non-specialist magazines fall somewhere in between. They know that their readers will use their review as a deliberative tool. However, also in order to maintain their ethos of experts, they will dress their review more as an epideictic exercise that as an explicit advice. They will carefully avoid spoilers, but they will not mention the issue of spoilers explicitly.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
15 answers
Literature about fishing practices and fishing communities usually describes men as the central protagonists of this activity. Some researchers (Motta-Maues, 1999) even argue that we, as researchers, are co-responsible to legitimize this situation, because whenever one studies fishing communities, s/he focuses on fishermen work and relegates women to secondary/complementary activities in the community.
Is it really like that?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Maria,
Is this a research paper or you just want to elaborate a fact?
Well, I should say that it depends on your definition of fishing whether as a hobby, sport or as a job; and whether it includes the role of a manager of a fishery or not.
In addition, the cultural and economic aspects should be taken into resolution.
For instance, I should agree that generally fishing and angling as a hobby are regarded as masculine hobbies. However, in classic form of fishing due to cheaper labor force many women work in that industry in East Asia,
In addition, fishing industry has been modernized, and huge ships and their crew trawl with sophisticated tools. Hence, women can work as part of the crew or in the office. Yet again, Nordic and East Asian countries are good example of such.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
20 answers
The mentioning of some words and / or objects is forbidden in some cultures i.e. unmentionables. Among the Akans of Ghana, for instance, the unmentionable objects include potentially destructive items like the pestle, wooden mortar and broom; and diseases such as whitlow, cancer and tuberculosis. There are other historical calamities which should not be referred to in the society. It is believed that spoken reference to any of such incidences is capable of leading to its reoccurrence. Does your culture have some of these verbal taboos? What are they and how are they managed in oral discourse? Your views will enrich our literature.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear All,
There are a lot of taboos of various origin and nature. The easiest way is to mention ancient or very old taboos. In Europe and in Hungary wolves (Canis lupus) were feared animals and are protagonists of many myths: Wererwolf (Werwolf, loup-garout, vérfarkas). The Hungarian equivalent of wolf is farkas it means an animal with a tail because one must have used only a circumlocution. The wolf itself was a taboo.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
19 answers
I'm in the process of writing a thesis looking at the construction of infertile selves through talk in doctor-patient encounters, looking at the ways infertile couples create, transform and resist culturally available discourses in the process of constructing their various identities. Has anyone come across a similar topic or piece of research, or could suggest a framework for analysis that would take into account the different variables my topic suggests?
Relevant answer
Answer
Have a look in the journal of discourse & society. Also Margaret Wetherell's edited collection on identities research as part of her work at The Open University (uk). I would also reiterate Michael's recommended reading.
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
3 answers
I am searching for reasons as to why there differing defecation practices. Could it that different community hold different discourses that influence the practices?
Relevant answer
Answer
There seems to be some interesting discourses in the marketing of moist toilet tissues that might be worth analysing http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/business/media/new-campaign-for-wet-toilet-tissue-advertising.html?_r=0
  • asked a question related to Discourse Studies
Question
21 answers
Philanthropy is a new term in the academic discourse which started in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Now, it attracts some colleges and universities especially in the West. For instance, Lilly School of Philanthropy in Indiana University deals with philanthropy studies exclusively. It is particularly essential to understand the role of gender in philanthropy.
Relevant answer
Use Gilligan's ethics of care theory of feminine morality as distinct from ethic of justice that characterises masculine morality. You may use Erickson's theory of the consciousness of the inner space characteristic of the feminine psychology of order