Science topic
Dialectic Materialism - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Dialectic Materialism, and find Dialectic Materialism experts.
Questions related to Dialectic Materialism
I want to know the similarities and differences between Spiritual Materialism and Dialectical materialism.
Who agrees philosophies can make interesting acronyms? How? Why?
My answer: My condensed philosophy is Humanitarianism, AntiRacism and transhumanism. Which makes the acronym HAT. I am no longer Marxist because materialism no longer appeals to me( hence my philosophical acronym used to be ATM standing for AntiRacist, Transhumanist and Marxist).
Reasons I am no longer a materialist:
(Souls Probably Exist) Source: ).
According to Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, Michael Tsarion and Dr. Webster Tarpley (and the "Black Nobility Terror" pdf)
The Descendants of the Ancient Aristocracies of the Mediterranean, which helped build up the city of Venice, Finally Married (their sons and daughters) into the Powerful Guelph (Welf) Dynasty of Germany and North Italy, and they sent their money to Switzerland, Holland and England so that they could easily cross the Atlantic and take over the Newly found American Continents.
The Venetians (Welf and other Dynasties) were a Financial and Advisory power behind the Protestant Reformation as well as the Jesuit Counter-Reformation (Divide and Rule) as well as behind the Rise of Isaac Newton and the Fall of Gottfried Liebniz.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
How the Dead Souls of Venice Corrupted Science
" We can approach these Venetian dead souls in three groups. First there is the group around Pietro Pomponazzi, Gasparo Contarini, and Francesco Zorzi, who were active in the first part of the 1500s. Second, there is the group of Paolo Sarpi and his right-hand man Fulgenzio Micanzio, the case officers for Galileo Galilei. This was the group that opposed Johannes Kepler in the early 1600s. Third, we have the group around Antonio Conti and Giammaria Ortes in the early 1700s. This was the group that created the Newton myth and modern materialism or utilitarianism and combated Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. These three groups of Venetian gamemasters are responsible for a great deal of the obscurantism and garbage that weighs like a nightmare on the brain of humanity today. These Venetian intelligence officials are the original atheists and materialists of the modern world, as reflected in the sympathy of Soviet writers for figures like Galileo, Newton, and Voltaire as ancestors of what was later called dialectical materialism. "
Laws of dialectics describe evolution of knowledge as well as development of things and nature. These laws are mainly three given by:
- The law of the unity and conflict of opposites.
- The law of the passage of quantitative changes into qualitative changes.
- The law of the negation of the negation.
However, how these laws are applied to conduct new research, to develop new solutions represents a challenging task. Please try to describe your experience on applying these laws to conform or arrive to novel and useful scientific or technical solutions.
That is not true in my humble opinion.
Let's say whether the increase in knowledge between 2000 and 2017 was greater than between 1900 and 1917, and it seems that since in the 21st century many more scientists are studying science, the rate of growth should now be higher. I personally doubt this. In my opinion, the claim that quantity changes into quality (dialectic materialism) does not apply to science.
Did you know if there were conducted any (statistical) research on this subject?
I am interested in a supplementary text to the main stream macroeconomics and monetary theory.
Deleuze, bergson, new materialism
There is some initial evidence from Millennials in the U.S. but would be interesting to know whether this is a trend that is structural in nature instead of a passing fad.
The initial evidence is the preference for sharing rather than owning, renting rather than buying etc.
The economic consequences of such a structural shift? For instance ownership tends to lead to commitment and therefore savings and investment. The abandonment of ownership for accessibility may change the preference structure as indicated by indifference maps?
