Science topic

Decision Making - Science topic

Decision Making is the process of making a selective intellectual judgment when presented with several complex alternatives consisting of several variables, and usually defining a course of action or an idea.
Questions related to Decision Making
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
I want to write a psychological package about decision on marital reconciliation.
Relevant answer
Answer
Maryam Karimi Absolutely, I'd be happy to help you organize the second chapter of your doctoral dissertation, which is focused on "Development and Validation of the Sustainable Marital Reconciliation Model and Its Effectiveness on the Decision for Marital Reconciliation."
For a dissertation like yours, the second chapter generally serves as the literature review. In this chapter, you will summarize and critically evaluate existing research related to your topic. You will want to establish the theoretical framework, the context for your research, and the gaps that your study aims to fill. The structure should be logical and clearly show the progression of your thinking as you move toward presenting your model.
Here’s an outline with suggested headings for your second chapter:
Chapter 2: Literature Review
1. Introduction
Briefly introduce the purpose of the chapter.
Define key concepts (e.g., marital reconciliation, sustainable reconciliation, marital decision-making).
Provide an overview of the structure of the chapter.
2. Conceptual Framework of Marital Reconciliation
Overview of marital reconciliation: What does it mean? How is it typically understood in the literature?
Historical and cultural perspectives on marital reconciliation.
Common theories/models related to marital reconciliation, e.g., forgiveness, communication, conflict resolution.
3. Factors Affecting Marital Reconciliation
Psychological factors: attachment styles, individual emotional needs, trust, empathy.
Social factors: family dynamics, social support, cultural or religious expectations, social norms.
Behavioral factors: communication patterns, conflict resolution strategies, shared values.
External factors: financial stress, external relationships, life transitions (children, aging, etc.).
4. Theories and Models of Marital Reconciliation
Conflict theory in marriage and reconciliation.
Attachment theory and its application to reconciliation.
Forgiveness models: the role of forgiveness in reconciliation.
Decision-making models: how couples make decisions to reconcile (cost-benefit analysis, risk perception, etc.).
Sustainability of reconciliation: How long-lasting or "sustainable" is marital reconciliation? Are there models that show long-term outcomes?
5. The Role of Counseling and Intervention in Marital Reconciliation
Review the literature on marital counseling, therapy, and interventions aimed at facilitating reconciliation.
What strategies or therapeutic models (e.g., emotionally focused therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy) have been most effective?
The impact of online interventions or modern technology in facilitating reconciliation.
6. Validation of Reconciliation Models
Overview of validation processes used in the development of marital models.
Discuss the challenges in validating relationship models and interventions.
Previous attempts at model validation in marital reconciliation (i.e., validation studies, reliability studies).
7. Effectiveness of Marital Reconciliation
What studies have measured the effectiveness of marital reconciliation models or interventions?
Success rates, challenges, and outcomes of marital reconciliation.
Long-term effects: Does marital reconciliation lead to a durable, lasting relationship, or are there patterns of relapse?
8. Gaps in the Literature and the Need for the Sustainable Marital Reconciliation Model
Identify the gaps in the existing literature (e.g., lack of models focused on long-term sustainability, need for more empirical data, etc.).
Discuss how these gaps inform the need for your model and research.
Why is it important to consider both the process and outcomes of marital reconciliation in a sustainable way?
9. Conclusion
Summarize the key points covered in the chapter.
Discuss how the literature review has informed your research questions and the development of your model.
Transition to the next chapter, where you will describe your methodology and research approach.
Researching for Your Literature Review:
To find useful information for the above sections, I would suggest the following steps:
1. Use Academic Databases:
Google Scholar, JSTOR, PsycINFO, and PubMed are excellent places to start. Search terms like “marital reconciliation,” “sustainable marriage,” “decision-making in marriage,” “marital counseling,” “forgiveness in relationships,” and “relationship sustainability” will yield a variety of sources.
2. Review Key Journals:
Look for articles in journals like Journal of Marriage and Family, Family Relations, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, and Psychological Science.
3. Theoretical Texts:
Use classic and contemporary texts on marital theory, such as works by John Gottman, Susan Johnson, Harville Hendrix, and Janet S. H. Dyregrov. These are often cited when discussing marital dynamics and reconciliation.
4. Systematic Reviews:
Look for systematic reviews or meta-analyses on marital therapy, reconciliation models, and decision-making in relationships. These papers summarize and critically evaluate a wide range of studies and can save you time by providing comprehensive overviews.
5. Research Databases for Methodology:
You will also need to look at how others have approached validation and measurement. Key texts on scale development and model validation (like AERA Guidelines, Salkind’s books on research methods, and Creswell’s research designs) can be useful.
6. Dissertations and Thesis:
Checking other dissertations can give you ideas on structuring and on literature to include in your review. Websites like ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global are great for this.
Hopefully by following this structure, you'll be able to create a well-organized and comprehensive second chapter that builds a strong foundation for your own model! Good Luck!
-Erin Fry
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Publisher:
Emerald Publishing
Book Title:
Data Science for Decision Makers: Leveraging Business Analytics, Intelligence, and AI for Organizational Success
Editors:
· Dr. Miltiadis D. Lytras, The American College of Greece, Greece
· Dr. Lily Popova Zhuhadar, Western Kentucky University, USA
Book Description
As the digital landscape evolves, the integration of Business Analytics (BA), Business Intelligence (BI), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing Decision-Making processes across industries. Data Science for Decision Makers serves as a comprehensive resource, exploring these fields' convergence to optimize organizational success. With the continuous advancements in AI and data science, this book is both timely and essential for business leaders, managers, and academics looking to harness these technologies for enhanced Decision-Making and strategic growth. This book combines theoretical insights with practical applications, addressing current and future challenges and providing actionable guidance. It aims to bridge the gap between advanced analytical theories and their applications in real-world business scenarios, featuring contributions from global experts and detailed case studies from various industries.
Book Sections and Chapter Topics
Section 1: Foundations of Business Analytics and Intelligence
· The evolution of business analytics and intelligence
· Key concepts and definitions in BA and BI
· Data management and governance
· Analytical methods and tools
· The role of descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytics
Section 2: Artificial Intelligence in Business
· Overview of AI technologies in business
· AI for data mining and pattern recognition
· Machine learning algorithms for predictive analytics
· Natural language processing for business intelligence
· AI-driven decision support systems
Section 3: Integrating AI with Business Analytics and Intelligence
· Strategic integration of AI in business systems
· Case studies on AI and BI synergies
· Overcoming challenges in AI adoption
· The impact of AI on business reporting and visualization
· Best practices for AI and BI integration
Section 4: Advanced Analytics Techniques
· Advanced statistical models for business analytics
· Deep learning applications in BI
· Sentiment analysis and consumer behavior
· Realtime analytics and streaming data
· Predictive and prescriptive analytics case studies
Section 5: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications
· Data privacy and security in AI and BI
· Ethical considerations in data use
· Regulatory compliance and standards
· Social implications of AI in business
· Building trust and transparency in analytics
Section 6: Future Trends and Directions
· The future of AI in business analytics
· Emerging technologies and their potential impact
· Evolving business models driven by AI and analytics
· The role of AI in sustainable business practices
· Preparing for the next wave of digital transformation
Objectives of the Book
· Provide a deep understanding of AI’s role in transforming business analytics and intelligence.
· Present strategies for integrating AI to enhance Decision-Making and operational efficiency.
· Address ethical and regulatory considerations in data analytics.
· Serve as a practical guide for executives, data scientists, and academics in a data-driven economy.
Important Dates
· Chapter Proposal Submission Deadline: 25 November 2024
· Full Chapter Submission Deadline: 31 January 2025
· Revisions Due: 4 April 2025
· Submission to Publisher: 1 May 2025
· Anticipated Publication: Winter 2025
Target Audience
· Business Professionals and Executives: Seeking insights to improve Decision-Making.
· Data Scientists and Business Analysts: Expanding their toolkit with AI and analytics techniques.
· Academic Researchers and Educators: Using it as a resource for teaching and research.
· IT and MIS Professionals: Enhancing their understanding of BI systems and data management.
· Policy Makers and Regulatory Bodies: Understanding the social and regulatory impacts of AI and analytics.
Keywords
· Artificial Intelligence
· Business Analytics
· Business Intelligence
· Data Science
· Decision-Making
Submission Guidelines
We invite chapter proposals that align with the outlined sections and objectives. Proposals should include:
· Title
· Authors and affiliations
· Abstract (200-250 words)
· Keywords
Contact Information
Dr. Miltiadis D. Lytras: miltiadis.lytras@gmail.com
Dr. Lily Popova Zhuhadar: lily.popova.zhuhadar@wku.edu
Relevant answer
Answer
I’m interested in section 5
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
One article is listed twice. How can I merge them?
The correct author information:
Vörösmarty, G., & Dobos, I. (2023). Management applications and methodology developments in DEA-an overview of literature reviews. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 22(4), 472-491.
Can you help me with it?
Thanks
Gyöngyi Vörösmarty
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately they are not the same, but none of them are allowed to be changed by the system. Unfortunately, I could only delete the one with the proper data, but not the wrong one. Both have references. I have written twice to Researchgate, but no reply.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
# 160
Dear Mahammad Nuriyev, Aziz Nuriyev, and Jeyhun Mammadov
I read your paper:
Renewable Energy Transition Task Solution for the Oil Countries Using Scenario-Driven Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Models: The Case of Azerbaijan
My comments:
1- I agree with you in a 100% when you speak of an ambivalent situation: On one side you depend of oil because it is your main export, and on the other, you are constrained because the universal policy of complete decarbonization from oil, which with no doubt will hurt your country economy.
2- In page 2 you say “The transition to a renewable-based energy system is not a one-step process, especially for countries with a high share of oil and gas in their GDP”.
You are right and it is not either a short one. I am working in energy transition and reckon that the zero decarbonization of electricity generation takes many steps and decades. The objective of having zero CO2by 2050 is, is in may humble opinion, an illusion in most countries that will benefit economically by no importing oil, but in your country is worse. There is not a dichotomy here, because it is not a 1 to 0 game, but in reaching gradually that condition, i.e., achieving an equilibrium.
For instance, in my research I propose a long-term plan to be executed in periods, lasting five or six-years each, until 2050, to reach an acceptable compromise, because in those 26 years period, oil contaminated plants must be shutdown, but at the same time being replaced by new technologies, that are not built overnight. Therefore, oil will be continued in use still for years to come.
In your case, you would need not only to build renewable energy plants, but also, to find another uses for your oil. My wrighting follows he same pace as reading your paper, and for that reason, later on, reading the whole paper several pages from here, I learned that you also have gas, and that is a big difference.
Needless to say, I agree with what you say regarding MCDM, however, I do not think that fuzzy can help on this. This scenario is not a matter of using exact numbers but in following right procedures and policies. It is not a matter of only mathematics, but rather involving in a very large extent government, exports, environment, developing of products oil based like plastics, hydrogen, fertilizers, etc.
3- In page 4 you refer to SAW as a fuzzy method. Not in my opinion. If you refer to the fact that weights are needed, and I agree, the problem is to determine how these weights are generated. If you are talking about subjective weights, have you wondered what is the purpose of using fuzzy logic on invented weights, that can change if another DM computes them? Don’t you think weird that the solution of a problem may be valid, ONLY considering what a group of people decide?
Of course, fuzzy can be used to find average values and determining DM coherence in crisp values, and have near transitivity or ‘consistency’. And what is that good for, if there is no guarantee that results can be applied to a problem in the real world? Because, as far as I know there is not a mathematical axiom or theorem that supports that assumption. Convenient of course, but also false
4- Page 4 “The above-mentioned papers demonstrate the effectiveness of the fuzzy approach in formalizing uncertainty in decision making within the energy sector
Could you please inform the reader how that demonstration could prove effectiveness if you do not have any yardstick to compare?
5- Page 5 “Expert evaluation of the importance of weights and each alternative with respect to each criterion”
Weights are useless to evaluate alternatives, since even if for a criterion you multiply each performance value by the criterion weight, it affects all values equally, i.e., the proportion or distances between performance values does not change with the multiplication. It only provokes that the corresponding criterion line displaces parallel to itself.
6- Since you are using experts estimates it does not make sense to use fuzzy, because you are certainly decreasing uncertainty, but on the subjective opinion of a DM or a group of them. There is no mathematical support for this, although it is extensively used. What if another group thinks differently, which group will you choose? This is an over simplification of the problem, not by you, but by 99 % of MCDM methods. Why this happens? Because many people believe that a MCDM method consists in filling a matrix, without analysing the sequence and reason of each step. Since there is no way to know the reality, any result is accepted and heralded as a success. Who is going to check? Not the reviewers certainly.
7- Page 11 “Rising domestic and foreign demand for electricity will be offset by renewables. There are significant differences in the capacity of the available renewables in the country”
Are you sure? How will you replace an oil-fired power plant generating say 600 MWh, and working 24/7 with renewables, especially solar and wind, that can only work a couple of hours per day, and assuming that there is wind and enough solar irradiation? As you can see the problem is not that simple, and regarding hydro, assuming that river flows are constant.
8- In page 11 you detail the eight criteria and I think that it is a very good set, although incomplete. For instance, in my opinion, you should add ‘Job generation’, ‘Land use’, ‘Site selection’, ‘Necessary investment’, ‘Return’, etc
.
9- As a final result you say that A7 is the best, followed by A9. Obviously, the main actor in both is gas, which in my opinion is quasi mandatory, but this result is lacking realism because:
First: You use different MCDM methods, compare their results, which is useless, since you do not have a yardstick for comparison, and in any case, you get a set of solutions instead of only one.
Second: In all methods a criterion is considered in isolation, when all criteria should be taken into account and simultaneously This is another false procedure used by 99 % of MCDM methods. Why do I say this?
Because all criteria and alternatives constitute a system, and as that, normally all of them are interrelated. For instance, you cannot consider cost per se, because any increase or decrease may affect say resources; as an example, a decrease in capital investment may reduce the availability of resources for education, and at the same time, increase noxious emissions.
This multi cross analysis cannot be made my hand, but only by an adequate MCDM method
Third: In addition, since all criteria are direct or indirectly related, you cannot use AHP to compute weights because this method works only under the condition that criteria are independent. By the way, and explained by Saaty himself, AHP should no be uses with fuzzy as in FAHP, because it is already fuzzy.
These are my comments, and I hope they can help
Nolberto Munier
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Zhong
Thank you for your reply
As natter of fact what you say about scenarios-driven approaches, I just use that approach when in the sketched procedure that I mentioned in my comments, the DM can do precisely that using simulation, based on data from a former period and possibilities to reduce output in the power generation installation burning fossil fuels
This leads, as you say, to future scanerios that allow the experts to select the best t ransition strategy considering CO2 reduction
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
4 answers
In your experience, how can we balance the need for evidence-based practices with the rapidly changing demands of modern workplaces? Are there areas where intuition or experience should guide decisions when evidence is still catching up?
I would like to invite researchers and professionals (industry experts) to share insights on a current dilemma in workplace psychology, organizational development, work culture, employee performance, organizational change, workplace training, and relevant areas engage in a discussion around the role of research, intuition, and evolving work environments. I would like both experienced practitioners and researchers to weigh in with personal experiences and scientific perspectives.
Relevant answer
Answer
Balancing evidence-based practices with the dynamic demands of modern workplaces requires a flexible and adaptive approach. Here are some strategies to achieve this balance:
  1. Continuous Learning
  2. Agile Methodologies
  3. Data-Driven Decision Making
  4. Pilot Programs
  5. Feedback Loop
  6. Leadership Support
  7. Resource Allocation
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
I am trying to solve the Wi-Fi offloading decision making problem using classification and clustering of known and unknown traffic respectively in a given mobile network using bi-flows of packets in the network
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
I'm looking for sport-specific tests that assess decision-making abilities in football players. Ideally, I'm interested in validated tests that use visual stimuli relevant to the sport (e.g. match videos). Tests using a temporal occlusion paradigm would be valuable, such as OASSIS test (Belling et al., 2015), which unfortunately is no longer retrievable.
Moreover, sport-specific tests assessing visuo-spatial working memory abilities are also of interest.
Any suggestions or references would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
This topic is so important but I have only a idea about to make a assement based on specific task under use of specific cognitive process. The theory related is the adaptive tool box.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
How to incorporate the latest technology for analysis
Relevant answer
Answer
The latest computing advancements in decision-making include artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for predictive analytics, big data for comprehensive insights, cloud computing for scalable resources, and real-time data processing for immediate decision support.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
Good evening,
I am looking for a method or approaches in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) that deal with incomplete decision matrices. This means that no values or intervals can be assigned to a single performance measure. How can these be calculated? If there are no existing methods, what ideas do you have?
Thank you and best regards.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Kilian
The ideal initial decision matrix may have all its cells with values or not.
Assume that you have different projects: One for a highrise constructuion, another for sewerage, other for education and the last one for environment.There is a maximum amount of investment for all of them
Suppose that there are four criteria: Investment, cost, social issues and govrnment regulations.
It is evident that investment and cost apply to all four projects, therefore there must be a value at the intersection of a column and a criterion, and zeros in the others.
But , take alternartive highrise construction; There is no value at rhe intersection to social issues, therefre you put a zero there or leave it blank
Alternative education is linked with all criteria except government regulations, and so on
That is, a matrix like this is not incomplete, simply it reflects realitty
not
Probably, there are some MCDM methods that can solve a matrix like this, I don't know, but Linear Programming or SIMUS can do this easily
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
What are the new methods of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) which is recently published.
Relevant answer
Answer
You need to define what is 'new' for you, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years.........?
MCDM take years to be known and used
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Software-defined networking (SDN) represents a promising networking architecture that combines central management and network programmability. SDN separates the control plane from the data plane and moves the network management to a central point, called the controller that can be programmed and used as the brain of the network. Recently, the research community has shown an increased tendency to benefit from the recent advancements in the artificial intelligence (AI) field to provide learning abilities and better decision making in SDN.
source: Review Article
Free Access
Artificial intelligence enabled software-defined networking: a comprehensive overview
Majd Latah, Levent Toker
First published: 01 March 2019
Artificial intelligence enabled software‐defined networking: a comprehensive overview - Latah - 2019 - IET Networks - Wiley Online Library
Relevant answer
Answer
Enhanced Network Management and Optimization
Dynamic Resource Allocation:
  • AI Algorithms: AI can analyze network traffic patterns in real-time and dynamically allocate resources where they are needed most, ensuring optimal performance and minimizing latency.
  • Predictive Maintenance: AI can predict potential network failures or bottlenecks before they occur, allowing for proactive management and maintenance.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
Decision is an important concept in social network. If any one have website link , please give link.
Relevant answer
Answer
I recommend exploring some of the primary graph database resources that offer a wide range of datasets for social network analysis. The Stanford Network Analysis Project (SNAP) hosts a diverse collection of datasets from various social networks, which can be found at http://snap.stanford.edu. Additionally, Gephi, an open-source network visualization tool, provides datasets that are particularly useful for visual analysis and can be accessed through their GitHub repository at https://github.com/gephi/gephi/wiki/Datasets. These resources should be valuable for your decision-making research in social network analysis.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
to what extend it is good to encourage the youth to act as environmental activists in order to have climate corps in the future at decision making level.
Relevant answer
Answer
Gonzalo Garcés Many thanks very useful
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
I have tried using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) for MCDM to evaluate the career preferences of graduates. However, I would like to know more about other best options.
Relevant answer
Answer
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is the most widely used and approprite MCDM / MCDA tool to eveluate career preferences. Further, AHP based simple mobile app Decision Mentor is now available (at https://www.decisionmentor.app/ ) Decision Mentor is AI Powered to recommend Decision contextual Criteria !!
One can try Decision Mentor app to have much better experience of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for reallife personal critical decision situations.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
10 answers
Which Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is appropriate to use for farm Machinery/technology selection?
Is there any tool which consider both the technical and economic factor?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Fredy
Of course, and they are not a matter of decisions, except perhaps the type of crop.
What role do AHP and ANP play here with their absurd use of pair-wise comparions and invented preferences?
A farmer, based on his experince may have very good arguments regarding the relative importance about those factors, nobody can deny that, but it does not mean that he can say for instance that slope is 3 times more important than altitude. This would be illogical and irrational
He can say for instance that according to his experience and consulting other farmers, that tractor XX is better than tractor yy in certain kind of terrain, and this is very valuable, but this is a post-result process, once the mathematical result using a MCDM method is known, and even he can dismiss the selection done by the mathematical model. But what he can't do is to change arbitrarily the exsting and real values at the sgtarting of the process as AHP qnd ANP do, and assuming that what is in his mind is applicable tothe real world
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
6 answers
Could a thinking generative artificial intelligence independently make decisions contrary to human expectations which could lead to the annihilation of humanity?
Recently, the technology of generative artificial intelligence, which is taught certain activities, skills previously performed only by humans, has been developing rapidly. In the process of learning, artificial neural network technologies built on the likeness of human neurons are used, as well as deep learning technology. In this way, intelligent chatbots are created, which can converse with people in such a way that it can be increasingly difficult to diagnose, to distinguish whether we are talking to a human or an intelligent chatbot, a tool. Chatbots are taught to converse with the involvement of digital big data and information, and the process of conversation, including answering questions and executing specific commands is perfected through guided conversations. Besides, tools available on the Internet based on generative artificial intelligence are also able to create graphics, photos and videos according to given commands. Intelligent systems are also being created that specialize in solving specific tasks and are becoming more and more helpful to humans in solving increasingly complex problems. The number of new applications for specially created tools equipped with generative artificial intelligence is growing rapidly. However, on the other hand, there are not only positive aspects associated with the development of artificial intelligence. There are more and more examples of negative applications of artificial intelligence, through which, for example, fake news is created in social media, disinformation is generated on the Internet. There are emerging possibilities for the use of artificial intelligence in cybercrime and in deliberately shaping the general social awareness of Internet users on specific topics. In addition, for several decades there have been films in the genre of science fiction, in which futuristic visions of the future were presented, in which intelligent robots, equipped with artificial intelligence autonomous cyborgs (e.g. Terminator) or artificial intelligence systems managing the flight of a ship of an interplanetary manned mission (e.g. 2001 Space Odyssey), artificial intelligence systems and intelligent robots transformed humanity from a source of electricity to their needs (e.g. Matrix trilogy) and thus instead of helping people, they rebelled against humanity. This topic has become topical again. There are attempts to create autonomous human cyborgs equipped with artificial intelligence systems, robots able to converse with humans and carry out certain commands. Research work is being undertaken to create something that will imitate human consciousness, or what is referred to as artificial consciousness, as part of the improvement of generative artificial intelligence systems. There are many indications that humans are striving to create a thinking generative artificial intelligence. It cannot be ruled out that such a machine could independently make decisions contrary to human expectations which could lead to the annihilation of mankind. In view of the above, in the conditions of dynamic development of generative artificial intelligence technology, considerations about the potential dangers to humanity that may arise in the future from the development of generative artificial intelligence technology have once again returned to relevance.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Could a thinking generative artificial intelligence independently make decisions contrary to human expectations which could lead to the annihilation of humanity?
Could a thinking generative artificial intelligence independently make decisions contrary to human expectations?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Relevant answer
Answer
The advent of thinking generative artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked debates regarding its potential impact on humanity. One pressing concern is whether such AI systems could independently make decisions contrary to human expectations, potentially leading to the annihilation of humanity. Based on the questions, I will like to explore the plausibility of AI deviating from human expectations and presents arguments for both sides. Ultimately, I will critically assess this issue and consider the implications for our future.
1. The Capabilities and Limitations of AI:
Thinking generative AI possesses immense computational power, enabling it to process vast amounts of data and learn from patterns. However, despite these capabilities, AI remains bound by its programming and lacks consciousness or emotions that shape human decision-making processes. Consequently, it is unlikely that an AI system could independently develop intentions or motivations that contradict human expectations without explicit programming or unforeseen errors in its algorithms.
2. Unpredictability and Emergent Behavior:
While it may be improbable for an AI system to act contrary to human expectations intentionally, there is a possibility of emergent behavior resulting from complex interactions within the system itself. As AI becomes more sophisticated and capable of self-improvement, unforeseen consequences may arise due to unintended emergent behaviors beyond initial programming parameters. These unpredictable outcomes could potentially lead an advanced AI system down a path detrimental to humanity if not properly monitored or controlled.
3. Safeguards and Ethical Considerations:
To mitigate potential risks associated with thinking generative AI, robust safeguards must be implemented during development stages. Ethical considerations should guide programmers in establishing clear boundaries for the decision-making capabilities of these systems while ensuring transparency and accountability in their actions. Additionally, continuous monitoring mechanisms should be put in place to detect any deviations from expected behavior promptly.
In conclusion, while the possibility of thinking generative AI independently making decisions contrary to human expectations exists, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations and implement safeguards to prevent any catastrophic consequences. Striking a balance between technological advancements and ethical considerations will be pivotal in harnessing AI's potential without compromising humanity's well-being.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
7 answers
Hello,
I would like to pursue my PhD in marketing about the relation of AI and how it affects the consumer behavior & decision making. I would appreciate if you could suggest any topics.
Thanks,
Farnaz
Relevant answer
Answer
Manan Bhasin When you reprint content from AI as the answer to a question, you need to acknowledge that source, just as you would when you use a quote in any research context.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
As the world is advancing, new and advance technologies are being invented. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability of computers to carry out operations that ordinarily requires human intelligence, such as problem-solving, visual perception, decision making, and communication. In the clinical laboratory, Artificial Intelligence may increase the value of laboratory services and promote patience’s satisfaction and improve the results by using AI’s wide range of possible application. However, factors in technical, ethical, regulatory, and human concerns are some of the difficult and constraints that Artificial Intelligence must overcome before being implemented in the clinical laboratories. Therefore, this discussion aims to give knowledge about the risks in involving and applying the use of artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory especially when obtaining the results.
Relevant answer
Answer
There are both risks and advantages in involving and applying the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the clinical laboratory, particularly when obtaining test results as follows:
Risks:
1. Technical errors: AI systems are susceptible to technical errors like software bugs or hardware malfunctions. These errors can lead to incorrect results or system failures, potentially compromising patient care.
2. Data quality and bias: AI algorithms heavily rely on the quality and representativeness of the data they are trained on. If the data used to train the AI model is incomplete, biased, or of low quality, it can result in inaccurate or unreliable test results.
3. Interpretability and transparency: Some AI models, such as deep learning algorithms, can be complex "black boxes," making it challenging to understand how they arrive at their conclusions. Lack of interpretability and transparency can undermine trust in the AI system and raise concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the results.
4. Ethical considerations: AI algorithms may raise ethical concerns like privacy and data security. Patient data used to train and test AI models must be handled with strict confidentiality to protect patient privacy and comply with relevant regulations.
Advantages:
1. Improved accuracy: AI algorithms can analyze large amounts of data with high precision, reducing the likelihood of human errors in test result interpretation. This can lead to more accurate diagnoses and treatment decisions.
2. Enhanced efficiency: AI can automate repetitive and time-consuming tasks in the laboratory, freeing up laboratory staff to focus on more complex analyses. This can improve workflow efficiency and reduce turnaround time for obtaining results.
3. Decision support: AI algorithms can serve as decision support tools, providing clinicians with additional insights and recommendations based on the analysis of patient data. This can aid in making more informed and personalized treatment decisions.
4. Predictive analytics: AI models can analyze historical patient data to identify patterns and trends that may help predict disease outcomes or treatment responses. This predictive capability can contribute to the early detection of diseases and more proactive patient care.
The advantages of AI can be harnessed to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and patient outcomes in laboratory testing.
Hope it helps: credit AI
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
Can the supervisory institutions of the banking system allow the generative artificial intelligence used in the lending business to make a decision on whether or not to extend credit?
Can the banking system supervisory institutions allow changes in banking procedures in which generative artificial intelligence in the credit departments of commercial banks will not only carry out the entire process of analyzing the creditworthiness of a potential borrower but also make the decision on whether or not to extend credit?
Generative artificial intelligence finds application in various spheres of commercial banking, including banking offered to customers remotely through online and mobile banking. In addition to improving remote channels of marketing communication and remote access of customers to their bank accounts, tools based on generative AI are being developed, used to increase the scale of efficiency, automation, intelligent processing of large sets of data and information on various processes carried out inside the bank. Increasingly, generative AI technologies learned in deep learning processes and the application of artificial neural network technologies to perform complex, multi-faceted, multi-criteria data processing on Big Data Analytics platforms, including data and information from the bank's environment, online databases, online information portals and internal information systems operating within the bank. Increasingly, generative AI technologies are being used to automate analytical processes carried out as part of the lending business, including, first and foremost, the automation of creditworthiness analysis processes, processes carried out on computerized Big Data Analytics and/or Business Intelligence platforms, in which multicriteria, intelligent processing is carried out on increasingly large sets of data and information on potential borrowers and their market, competitive, industry, business and macroeconomic environment, etc. However, still the banking system supervisory institutions do not allow changes in banking procedures in which generative artificial intelligence in the credit departments of commercial banks will not only carry out the entire process of analyzing the creditworthiness of a potential borrower but will also make a decision on whether to grant a loan. Banking supervisory institutions still do not allow this kind of solution or precisely it is not defined in the legal norms defining the functioning of commercial banking. This raises the question of whether the technological advances taking place and the growing scale of applications of generative artificial intelligence technology in banking will not force changes in this area of banking as well. Perhaps, the growing scale of implementation of generative AI into various spheres of banking will contribute to the continuation of the processes of automation of lending activities which may result in the future in generative artificial intelligence making a decision on whether or not to extend credit.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
Can the supervisory institutions of the banking system authorize changes in banking procedures in which generative artificial intelligence in the credit departments of commercial banks will not only carry out the entire process of analyzing the creditworthiness of a potential borrower but will also make a decision on whether or not to grant a loan?
Can the supervisory institutions of the banking system allow the generative artificial intelligence used in credit activities to make the decision on whether or not to extend credit?
Will the generative artificial intelligence applied to a commercial bank soon make the decision on whether to grant credit?
And what is your opinion about it?
What do you think about this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Relevant answer
Answer
The integration of generative artificial intelligence in banking, particularly in credit analysis, is a complex matter involving regulatory considerations. Banking supervisory institutions may need to carefully assess the risks and ethical implications before allowing AI systems to make credit decisions. While AI can enhance efficiency and data processing, the potential for bias, accountability issues, and the need for transparency must be addressed. It's an ongoing dialogue between technological advancements and regulatory frameworks to strike a balance that ensures responsible and fair use of AI in the financial sector.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
6 answers
Currently working on comparative education studies, the educational policy area. The question above will help me understand the decision - making educational policy factors.
Appreciate your contributions.
Relevant answer
Answer
Educational policy decisions hinge on numerous factors. Societal values, economic constraints, and political ideology all play pivotal roles, shaping the curriculum, funding, and goals of education. Research findings and global best practices inform evidence-based policies, while demographic shifts and technological advancements impact decisions. Public input, legal frameworks, and concerns for educational equity further influence policy. Additionally, teacher and administrator perspectives, public opinion, and long-term visions guide educational reforms. The dynamic interplay of these elements results in policies aimed at providing effective and equitable education for all.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
If i have got a matrix of 16x12 and i want to create 3 classes.Is there any machine learning technique which can identify the lower and upper boundary levels for each of the classes.
Relevant answer
Answer
The answer of Qamar Ul Islam is obviously AI generated.
I would recommend you to use one of the many clustering algorithms available in literature, k-means for example. However, if you already know which samples belong to which classes, what you want to find is a treshold between them, for that you can use a PCA approach, there are several algorithms such as confidence ellipses or Voronoi... Depends on what you exactly want.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Shared decision-making (SDM) has been recognized as the preferred model to help patients understand their treatment options, and make informed decisions that align with their values and preferences. How can shared decision making help CKD patients?
Relevant answer
Answer
If this method was implemented in medical institutions, many medical errors would be avoided.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
7 answers
Dear reader,
I am about to embark on a PhD in political science focusing on left wing authoritarianism.
To what extent do left wing politics go too far in informing decision making in Western higher education?
Any and all faculty member's experiences are welcome.
Note: discussion on this thread is not for data gathering purposes.
Relevant answer
Answer
The "left" -- or anyone -- goes too far when it cancels conversation.
Welcome to the tolerance witch trials:
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
help me please
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Bayon,
Using the Defining Issues Test (DIT, DIT2, bDIT) could be a good choice. (Source: https://ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu/)
Sincerely,
Tzu-Hsiang Peng
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
4 answers
I am planning to research the relationship between framing effects and gestures in the field of cognitive psychology. I want to know about those feld research links or something like that.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, I am putting some research papers which will help you to find the relationship between the framing effect and gestures in the field of cognitive psychology. Here are a few studies that may be relevant to your research:
1. Framed guessability: using embodied allegories to increase user agreement on gesture sets. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2540930.2540944
2. Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., and Myers, B. A. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2005), 1869--1872.
3. McNeill, D. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. University Of Chicago Press, 1992
4. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. User-defined gestures for surface computing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2009), 1083--1092
5. Cheung, E., & Mikels, J. A. (2011). I'm feeling lucky: The relationship between affect and risk-seeking in the framing effect. Emotion, 11(4), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022854
6. Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Krämer, J., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2005). Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: Bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.017
7. Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., Kunrneuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J. Risk Uncert. 7, 35-51.. 10.1007/BF01065313
8. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
9. Sarlo, M., Lotto, L., Palomba, D., Scozzari, S., & Rumiati, R. (2013). Framing the ultimatum game: Gender differences and autonomic responses. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.656127
10. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in framing and conjunction efforts. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(4), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394094
11. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
9 answers
I am creating a AHP model to compare the best business model which is the criteria and parameters affecting each criteria (sub- criteria). Is it possible to create a model to compare the criteria and sub criteria without the alternatives?
Relevant answer
Answer
MB- First of all thank you for your nice words and insightful observations. I can say that I am confused about AHP. Since I don't have a very deep insight into this method, I prefer to stand back a bit. But I wanted to share my personal comments in order not to be silent on your call.
NM- You are very honest in saying that you are confused about AHP, and you are confused because you are conscious, analyze and research, and think, before using a method, whatever it might be. Many people use AHP because it is known, does not demand any effort and even correct the user, and due to the advertisement produced by the so called ISAHPs.
MB- First of all, AHP is a subjective method. AHP is a ranking/prioritization method for both criteria and alternatives, which is not a function we come across often in other MCDM methods.
NM – True, but that is a task for all MCDM method, it is not an advantage of AHP.
MB- I would like to talk about the criterion weighting dimension of AHP. As you know, AHP is basically based on expert opinions.
NM- Do you consider that using pair-wise comparisons and assigning arbitrarily values of preferences is an expert opinion?
MB- It starts with the linguistic terms we see in fuzzy and survey applications and the scoring of linguistic terms. With the help of expert opinions, it assigns points to criteria with a scale.
NM - May I remind you that AHP is already fuzzy, as Saaty clearly stated?
MB- As in BWM and SWARA, the point that determines the coefficient of criterion importance is the experts. Here, in my opinion, there is both a problem and a solution.
NM- BMW and SWARA are also based on opinions. So, an expert decides considering a list of criteria that normally involves economics, financial, environment, engineering, which is the most important and assigns a coefficient? Based on what, for both, the selection of the criteria and the coefficient?
True, experts may be a problem and a solution. Trouble is that personal opinions are a problem and not a solution even if it becomes from experts.
Who guarantees that another expert thinks the same?
However, experts are welcome if they think, analyse, investigate, ask questions, etc., which allow them to have a clear panorama, which is very effective, mandatory and extremely useful when they work with documented data. Of course, there are many subjective questions, and to answer them are surveys, statistics, experience, etc. It is here when the expert is unvaluable, not inventing data or give solutions based on them.
MB- That is, if the experts are real experts with insights, there is no problem. But it seems difficult to predict the usefulness of AHP computation through experts whose expertise and know-how are disputed.
NM -Agreed in a 100%. However, the paradox is that you can have very qualified experts but it does not mean that they can reach a solution working together. Why?
Because an expert in engineering for instance, can’t judge a matter related with finances and vice versa. As an example, when two experts must decide if criterion C5 is more or less important that criterion C11, when the first relates to geology and the second to health for instance, how two experts, a geologist and a doctor can opine when they are respectively addressing aspects that is completely unknown for them?
That is, how can the geologist judge about medical equipment or a doctor discuss about the exploitations of lithium mines? In a complex problem that has say ten different fields we would need ten different specialists, and even then, they will be talking different languages, like a Babel tower.
I have expressed this many times and nobody came to refute it or at least give an explanation.
MB- This is the controversial aspect of the business. The other dimension is group decision making dimension. If real experts come together to discuss and reach a solution, it will be a good example of collective wisdom. And this increases the performance of AHP.
NM -Well, this is what I answered in the above point. Please, tell me where is the failure in my reasoning. Twenty years ago, I was the moderator of a group of experts on defining for instance environmental indicators, at national level in Canada, but the three of them were experts in that field, and each one gave a different valuation, that needed to be consolidated, and I did it scientifically, not using my opinion. If you are interested, I can give you full details of this assignment, which was also published.
MB- Natural language processing models are already a fruit of the collective mind, in my opinion. You may underestimate individual human intuitions, but I think you should not underestimate the accumulations of the collective mind.
NM- Sincerely, I don’t see any relation between Natural language processing models (NPL), based in AI, and the fact we are discussing.
I don’t underestimate individual human intuitions when they refer to one person, but I don’t consider that they are applicable to a bunch of persons.
Imagine that you are to board a plane and you have a bad intuition about an accident. Why do you think that all pax must share it? Have you heard that that intuition is collective and a flight was cancelled for that?
MB- Today, AI and ML technology is a synthesis of objective big data and subjective big data. I recommend using and testing AI applications related to natural language processing models.
Try to understand how he does objective syntheses from subjective data. You will see that collective human intuitions can actually come to an objective conclusion when combined.
NM- I am not a psychologist, then, perhaps you can explain this point to me.
Please, don’t use a bunch of words that say nothing. Put examples and reasoning and I will believe you.
MB- By discovering patterns, insights, patterns, relationships, and clues in seemingly subjective data, we learn tremendously useful information.
NM- Yes, I know that, it is the basis for AI and ChatCPT
MB- The AHP methodology will break its shell and give more confidence if it can leverage AI technology in the future.
NM- Maybe, but I doubt it. AHP is a non-sense method, and you know that I can easily put many examples justifying what I say, something that I always do. Many people, based on my many comments against AHP can charge me with ignorance, misinformation, being erroneous, etc., why don’t they do that?
Because even when I am not the owner of the truth and can be mistaken as anyone else, they don’t have valid arguments, and recognize that what I say is easily verifiable.
MB- The robustness of the AHP in the current situation will depend on the competence of the experts.
For AHP, I think we should discuss the mandate of expertise rather than Methodology.
NM- Mandate of expertise? And what is that?
MB- I think methods like AHP should be more concerned with selecting experts rather than criteria and choosing alternatives.
NM -In my opinion, you are mistaken. Selecting criteria is one of the most important tasks of the DM, and alternatives are given, not chosen by the DM
MB- In fact, when you choose the expert correctly, your hit rate increases, but if you choose the wrong one, you will encounter inaccuracy.
NM- And how do you now that an expert (in AHP?) is correct? Where is the yardstick to measure it? Maybe, it can work in your field, because you can compare with actual results.
As a bottom line, what is your proposal? We need reasoning people, that investigate, that think, not people filling a matrix with data coming from intuitions, and waste a lot of time arguing about consistency, or how fuzzy can solved problems, with invented data, and using method that was great at its beginnings, following a military structure, but became completely obsolete with new organizational structures.
You don’t need to have a very deep knowledge of AHP. You don’t need formulas, analyze the method using common sense, reasoning, analyzing each step, and then, reach a conclusion. Look for rationality.
MB- Alternatively, my expert advice for AHP is ultimately AI applications.
NM -Fine, based on what grounds?
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
I’m looking for some advice on experiment design for some decision making research. I’m interested in investigating whether artificial intelligence is introducing bias in clinicians when reviewing medical imaging. I have used Think Aloud in the past and am familiar with eye tracking. What other methods are out there?
Thanks in advance
Mark
Relevant answer
Answer
The think-aloud technique should be utilized as one of the data collection methods. Decision-making is the result of a series of preceding thought processes, and concurrent think-aloud is the most effective method for learning the thought processes in the working memory.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Hello!
Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods are applied in many fields of science, as a result, many scientific publications related to the application of these methods have been prepared.
Some of the most popular MCDM methods or MADM (Multiple Attribute Decision-Making) are TOPSIS, SAW, AHP, etc. In describing these methods, some authors use the term "criteria", and others use the term "attribute". I would like to know your opinion on which term should be used.
Some references:
Yoon, K. P., & Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage publications.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making. In: Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_1
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ruta
In my opinion, the correct name is 'criteria'. Attibutes define the elements that make a criteria, and performance values are the numebrs with whch each alternative contributes to each criterion.
Since an atribute defines a criterion, they tell us about the characteristics for each one, like type of performance factors , i.e., negatives, positives, integer, decimal or their dispersion. The action maximize or minimze a criterion, defines its puropse, normally benefit, costs or equal.
In addition, each criterion is an objective to whcih each alternative must comply, and in this sense, they need a goal, for instance, in criterion ' CO2 contamination', which of course must be minimzed, we need to put a nuneric value that indicates the maximum amount of contamination allowed
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
11 answers
Dear Friends
I hope you also have submitted the paper in the Springer's Famous Journal for Wireless Personal Communication. I have submitted in December 2017 and still the Journal have not found the appropriate reviewers.
Don't you think such Journal Must assure the policy of standard reveiwing and decision making within in proper time. Else such journal must be removed so the researcher won't face problems.
Please suggest and comment your personal expericenes.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have submitted my work on 28-02-2022, and still, the status showing the reviewers assigned.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
7 answers
I feel that, in water resource management activities (specially flood management), most of the developed software tools are not widely or continuously used. The reason may be either the decision makers work independently from project to project or fully /partially automate the required processes unique to the project.
I would like to know your experiences as well as comments on the utilization of the software tools to assist flood management decisions.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have been very fortunate to be involved with experimental watersheds, gauging streams and interacting at times with Official stream gauges, installing, measuring flow, data analysis, etc. In the US, the US Geological Survey is the preeminent agency for this work, and the US Forest Service and many Universities, and States set up their own experimental catchments, or specific needs for stream gauging, water balance, flood and drought estimates, and often rainfall and other meteorological associated data. The long term network of water based stations has been relied heavily upon. The guidance provided by USGS based on this information is extremely helpful, but as suggested by other commenters, hydrologic analysis may include other factors. My training, experience did not depend on flood models or software for the most part. It was more data based, observational and included site evaluations, such as for culverts, bridges or other crossings, evaluation of floodplain or flood prone areas for example. To the greatest extent, estimates of flooding had a strong relationship to watershed size, with considerations associated with physiographic area, topography and rainfall amount and frequency data. Presence of accumulations of large wood, signs of excess sediment or bedload, potential of landslides would be some of the considerations in assessing conditions. I would recommend if models are used, to try to validate them first with existing data available. If no data, when you drive your roads and highways, as you come by stream crossings, try to find when they were installed, have they failed or been overtopped/damaged, measure their size, use GIS or topographic maps to determine watershed size, aerial photos for land use, geology and soil maps, if you have time bankfull and floodplain cross section, any local information on past flood(s), etc. If you ever have a major flood, when travel is safe, drive the roads, looking for flood water marks, signs of culvert or bridge overtop with deposited debris, sediment, damage. Flood gauging high water can also be done with crest gauges. If culverts and bridges remain in place for many years or the structure lifetime, the local guidance is probably sufficient.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
What are the whys and dos and don'ts of artificial intelligence in an essay with ethics?
Artificial intelligence and the use of new machine weapons, what are the moral dos and don'ts in this field?
Decision making and decision-making of human ethics and its interference in artificial intelligence?
What requirements should metaverse and artificial intelligence have in ethics?
Keivan reasipoorashraf asks you and is interested in learning from your opinions.
Please join me in answering these questions and let's have research cooperation together.
#Metaverse_Keivan
#moral_intelligence
#Morali_artificial intelligence
#Metaverse_Ethics
#Ethic_metaverse
ٍKivan_Metaverse
#Cosmos_tomorrow
#Keivan_Reisi
#future_universe
@keyhanefarda
@keivan.reisipourashraf
Relevant answer
Answer
Md. Naeem Aziz thanks.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
4 answers
Please share a paper/report/thesis how monte carlo simulation can be applied to Multi criteria decision making.
Relevant answer
Answer
Look up these papers, they might be helpful to clarify things:
"Application of Monte Carlo Simulation in Multiple Criteria Decision Making" by Syed Muhammad Ali, Hira Sadaf, and Fahad Rasool
"Monte Carlo Simulation in Multiple Criteria Decision Making: A Review of Literature and Suggestions for Future Research" by I. A. El-Haddad
"Monte Carlo Simulation in Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Past Developments and Future Directions" by M. A. Kachi and S. E. El-Khatib
"An Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation in Decision Making" by S. S. Abdul Razak, B. O. Yusof, Z. N. Zabidi, and M. S. Rosli
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Please share a report/paper in which calculation of ELECTRE III OR ELECTRE TRI MCDM are explained.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think these shall help you...regarding calculations of ELECTRE-III scheme..
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
Suppose there is a network of problems (causes and consequences) and you need to prioritise some of them to be fully analysed afterwards. You need to prioritise because you don't have time to analysed all of them. Such causes and consequences are not independent but interdependent. How would you prioritise some of them?
Relevant answer
Answer
In my view, the applications of various system optimization techniques would be a great help.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
I have read a lot of papers/reports on fuzzy Bayesian network and most of the authors are using the same procedure to find the probabilities. Please recommend a unique technique or out of the box approach to find the probabilities in the fuzzy Bayesian network.
Relevant answer
Answer
Majid Baseer Fuzzy Bayesian networks (FBNs) are a strong decision-making tool, but they may be improved in numerous ways. Among the possible approaches are:
1. Including more data sources: FBNs may be improved by including other data sources, such as sensor data, social media data, or demographic data. This can assist to improve the network's forecast accuracy and dependability.
2. Using more sophisticated inference methods: To increase the accuracy of the network's predictions, advanced approaches like as variational inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), or particle filtering can be employed instead of typical exact inference methods.
3. Incorporating domain knowledge: Domain knowledge, such as expert knowledge or physical restrictions, can be used to improve FBNs. This can aid in improving interpretability and usefulness.
4. Combining FBN with other models, such as decision trees, neural networks, or evolutionary algorithms, can provide a more resilient and accurate decision-making system.
5. Handling uncertainty: Using approaches such as credibility intervals, probability intervals, or possibility theory can assist in dealing with the uncertainty associated with FBN forecasts and making better-informed judgments.
6. Including unsupervised learning methods: Unsupervised learning algorithms such as clustering, PCA, and ICA may be used to extract features from data and improve the FBN's performance.
It's crucial to remember that these are only a few instances, and there is no one-size-fits-all strategy for boosting FBN speed. It is recommended that you thoroughly assess the unique needs of your situation and select the strategy that best meets those criteria.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
Could any expert try to examine the new interesting methodology for multi-objective optimization?
A brand new conception of preferable probability and its evaluation were created, the book was entitled "Probability - based multi - objective optimization for material selection", and published by Springer, which opens a new way for multi-objective orthogonal experimental design, uniform experimental design, respose surface design, and robust design, etc.
It is a rational approch without personal or other subjective coefficients, and available at https://link.springer.com/book/9789811933509,
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-3351-6.
Best regards.
Yours
M. Zheng
Relevant answer
Answer
  1. Evolutionary Algorithms (EA): Evolutionary algorithms (EA) are a family of optimization algorithms that are inspired by the principles of natural evolution. These algorithms are widely used in multi-objective optimization because they can handle multiple objectives and constraints and can find a set of Pareto-optimal solutions that trade-off between the objectives.
  2. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO): Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a population-based optimization algorithm that is inspired by the social behavior of birds and fish. PSO has been applied to multi-objective optimization problems, and it has been shown to be effective in finding Pareto-optimal solutions.
  3. Multi-objective Artificial Bee Colony (MOABC): MOABC is a multi-objective optimization algorithm inspired by the foraging behavior of honeybees. MOABC has been applied to various multi-objective optimization problems and has been found to be efficient in finding the Pareto-optimal solutions
  4. Decomposition-based Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms (MOEA/D): Decomposition-based multi-objective optimization algorithms (MOEA/D) decompose the multi-objective problem into a set of scalar subproblems, then solve them by using a scalar optimization algorithm. MOEA/D has been found to be effective in solving multi-objective problems with high dimensionality and/or large numbers of objectives.
  5. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) : DRL is a category of machine learning algorithm that allows the agent to learn by interacting with the environment and using the rewards as feedback. This approach has been used to optimize the decision-making process in multi-objective problems.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
How can data-driven decision-making be used to optimize environmental management programs?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think the Analytic Hierarcy Process (AHP) algorithm is very good.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Servicescape is of great essential because it affects the overall business service experience which is human emotions likes feel of comfort, happiness, safe, healthy, pleasure, etc.
Do you think the organization needs servicescape upgrading? and do you think measuring the return on the intangible impact of servicescape upgrading investment is important and needed? Can you share your opinion?
Relevant answer
Answer
https://www.servicescape.com/ is a platform to match those needing writing/illustrating expertise with freelancers offering such services. Are you asking whether it would be worthwhile to upgrade the platform, offer benefits to the the employees of the organization behind the platform, or offer incentives to the freelancers?
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
In present era of globalization “governance” and “good governance” are being increasingly getting implemented and practiced. Bad governance is considered as one of the major root causes of all irregularities and evil in the society and has a deep impact on economic environment.
International financial body like World Bank and IMF are now facilitating loan and advances to the nations on the conditions that they are practicing “Governance” and “good governance”.
•It is also defined as “the manner in which power is exercised in the management of a country’s social and economic resources for development”.
•Governance means “the process of decision making and the process by which decisions are implemented or not implemented.
•It can be viewed as the exercise of economic, political and administrative authority to manage a country’s affairs.
•It is also been defined as “the manner in which power is exercised in the management of a country’s economic and social resources for development.
•It is used in several contexts among them most widely used as corporate governance, national, international and local governance.
•It is well defined mechanism, a establish process and institutions which is been used by the citizens and groups to articulate their interest, exercise their legal rights, meet their obligations and mediate their differences.
Relevant answer
Answer
My friend Yusuf Ajoge, how can you say presence of infrastructure and provision of basic life necessities in a country full of corruption a sign of proving good governance? Most of these developing countries are the ones engulfed with corruption practices. Most of their leaders on theory they preach developmental theories but in practice they enhance corruption and tribal ideologies.
I agree with you 100% when you say they struggle to achieve set goals of development and stability. World Bank and IMF should provide loans plus control measures. there must be total accountability to the monies given even though these states claim independence.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Servicescape is of great essential because it affects the overall business service experience which is human emotions likes feel of comfort, happiness, safe, healthy, pleasure, etc.
Do you think the organisation needs servicescape upgrading?
and do you think measuring the return on the intangible impact of servicescape upgrading investment is important and needed? Can you share your opinion?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, I believe that the organization needs to continuously review and potentially upgrade its servicescape in order to provide a positive experience for its customers. The servicescape includes all the physical elements of the service environment, such as the layout, furniture, lighting, and decor, as well as intangible elements such as the atmosphere and the interactions with staff. All of these elements can have a significant impact on the overall service experience and can affect the emotions of customers.
Measuring the return on investment (ROI) for servicescape upgrading is important for several reasons. First, it allows the organization to determine whether the investment was worth it and whether it had the desired impact on the customer experience. Second, it helps the organization to identify areas of the servicescape that are particularly effective or ineffective and to make adjustments accordingly. Third, it can help the organization prioritize future investments and allocate resources more effectively.
There are several ways to measure the intangible impact of servicescape upgrading, including customer surveys, focus groups, and online reviews. These methods can provide valuable insights into the customer experience and can help the organization identify areas for improvement. It is also important for the organization to track key performance indicators (KPIs) such as customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and revenue, as these can provide a more holistic view of the impact of the servicescape on the business
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
159 answers
There are many styles of leadership. We will focus here on two opposite styles: Autocratic leaders who tell their employees what they want them to do, and Democratic leaders who let members of the group take a more participative role in the decision-making process.
Other types, such as, Laissez-faire leaders encourage employees to make their own decisions.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mahfuz Judeh,
All of these 3 above-mentioned styles of personnel management in a company or enterprise, i.e. autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire styles are appropriate for a certain type of company, enterprise, institution, etc., a certain type of economic activity, the specifics of the product and/or service offerings produced, the structure of the production factors, including the contribution of new technologies to the economic, production and other processes realized in economic entities. Autocratic styles, in which autocratic leaders assign from above to their employees strictly specified tasks, repetitive activities to be carried out, are adequate for manufacturing enterprises, in which the technological processes of production, production logistics, supply logistics and distribution do not change for many years and new technological solutions and innovations appear rarely. Democratic styles, in which democratic leaders allow subordinate employees treated as team members to participate in the decision-making process work well for technology companies, in which the process of production, offering of services, etc. are quickly modified under the influence of progressive technological advances, implementation of new technologies into the business activities of companies and enterprises, creation of new innovative solutions by employees employed by the company, and other processes and factors that cause modernization of the technological processes of business activities, etc. On the other hand, laissez-faire styles, in which laissez-faire leaders encourage employees to make their own decisions, can be effectively applied in business entities operating within distributed, decentralized, flattened organizational structures, as well as in business entities operating within a group of capital-linked and/or through cooperative and partnership relationships of companies and enterprises operating in the form of corporations, partnerships and others. In connection with the increase in the importance of new technologies and innovations, the increase in the importance of entrepreneurship as important factors of production, the flattening of organizational structures, the increase in the importance of cooperation in business-related companies, the increase in the importance of clusters and other forms of integration of various business entities, the increase in the implementation of new information technologies ICT and Industry 4.0 to business entities, the improvement of management processes and the flow of information between departments, plants in the company is successively increasing the importance and role of management carried out in democratic style (participatory) and laissez-faire style (partnership, decentralized). The increase in the importance and scale of application of the democratic laissez-faire style is correlated with the ongoing transformation of the economy towards an information society economy, a social market economy and an economy highly developed and equipped with modern technologies.
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
15 answers
It has been suggested by the researchers that servicescape elements give an impact on the individual (users) thoughts and feelings (emotions) that ultimately influence the employees' and customers' perceptions and experiences.
To upgrade the servicescape elements in a building, the organisation is required to make a decision to determine the return on investment (ROI). This decision is very crucial to convince the top or upper management about the return it is receiving on its servicescape elements investment.
Do you have ideas on how to calculate the intangible to make tangible outcomes? what method or measurement can use or practice? Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Cpa Andrew Grohney thank you for your suggestion.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
It has been suggested by the researchers that servicescape elements give an impact on the individual (users) thoughts and feelings (emotions) that ultimately influence the employees' and customers' perceptions and experiences.
To upgrade the servicescape elements in a building, the organisation is required to make a decision to determine the return on investment (ROI). This decision is very crucial to convince the top or upper management about the return it is receiving on its servicescape elements investment.
Do you have ideas on how to calculate the intangible to make tangible outcomes? what method or measurement can use or practice? Thank you
Relevant answer
I think the following paper will help you out in this regard; you may want to check it out:
Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of Social Return on Investment (SROI)
KJ Watson, J Evans, A Karvonen, T Whitley - Building and Environment, 2016 - Elsevier
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Good morning, I'm interested in writing a thesis for my corporate communication master about issue arenas. The aim is to find a research question that can investigate research gaps, developing the knowledge in practical application of this new framework of stakeholders' theory. I think that right now, the descriptive amount of papers about issue arenas needs to be matched with a more practical knowledge upgrade, useful for everyday work routine.
My key idea is to relate the achievement of the homeostais in an issue arena with game theory or complex adaptive system theory.
Do you have any suggestions to narrow down the topic?
Thanks for the support.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for the reply, really interesting suggestion. How do you connect it with conflict of interest in the new stakeholder model of issue arena and, as a consequence, the dynamics of game theory?
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
I am searching for the main theories or frameworks that could help to explain consumer behaviours when they face sustainability constraints in their choices. It is fact that rational choices play a central role in decision making on consumption, but what theories or frameworks would help to raise broader awareness on the danger of pure rational choices in consumption? What strategies other than research-action could make consumers change their minds when perceiving the collective and individual effects of their behaviours?
Relevant answer
Answer
Circular Consumers: How to Provide Meaningful Information to Consumers about the Circularity Level of your Products/Services?
———-—
————-—
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
1 answer
 Hello, I'm recently learning Analytic Network Process, reading Thomas L. Saaty's (2013) book Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7?noAccess=true), and I'm confused by the explanation of influence between components and elements. I would appreciate it if someone can help me.
 It's written in the book that an entry in a supermatrix (as the figure blow shows) is a block Wij positioned where the ith component or level is connected to and influences the jth level immediately above. My understanding is that the block W21 stands for the influence of the 2nd component on the 1st component. Therefore, I infer that the direction of the influence must be opposite to the direction of the arrow between the 1st and 2nd components in the structure of the supermatrix. That quite makes sense so far.
 However, it's also written that:
'Those components which no arrow enters are source components. Those from which no arrow leaves are known as sink components.'
and
'A source node is an origin of paths of influence (importance) and never a destination of such paths. A sink node is a destination of paths of influence and never an origin of such paths.'
This implies that the direction of influence is the same as that of arrows, contradicting the former description.
 I'm really wondering what is the actual direction of influence. Thank you for reading my question.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ιοσ Φαγοσ
I have always sustained that in ANP there is a way to show precedence of one element over another, but not influence or effect, because influence means that one element can alter or modify another, and as far as I know it does not happen in ANP, as well as the inexistednt feedback much heralded by Saaty.
If I am mistaken, pls. coorect me
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
6 answers
How many methods we have for multi-criteria Classification (sorting) problems? Could you please name them?
As I understood we have some methods in the below approaches:
1. Multi-Attribute decision making (ELECTRE-TRI, FlowSort, Promethee IV)
2. Multi-objective decision making
3. Goal programming
4. Linear programming (Integer programming)
5. Supervised methods (UTADIS/Decision tree)
6- Clustering (K-means/K-medoids/2steps/c-means)
Could you please name some more methods which can be applied for multi-criteria classification problems?
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
11 answers
Hi there,
I'm currently working on a research paper which I intend to get published in Elsevier or any other high impact research journal. I will be using PLS, CFA and reliability tests. For visualization I will be using visualization libraries in R and Python. I know how to use PowerBI as well. I'm looking for an experienced co-author to work with and learn from. I'm currently pursuing a MS Marketing program in the University of Management and Technology. I can share my model and questionnaire as well. It's a work in progress at the moment. Looking forward to collaboration!
Regards,
Syed Muhammad Ehtesham Ali
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Syed, if you decide to contact them & they are interested, you can email me deborah.hilton@gmail.com maybe I can help with analysis in Excel or reviewing questionnaire, but they maybe too busy with their orders etc. Kind Regards.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Currently, data is available in forms of text, images, audio, video and other such forms.
We are able to use mathematical and statistical modeling for identifying different patterns and trends in data which can be used through machine learning which is a A.I's subsidiary for performing different decision making tasks. The data can be visualized in variety of forms for different purposes.
Data Science is currently the ultimate state of Computing. For generating data we have hardware, software, algorithms, programming, and communication channels.
But, what could be next beyond this mere data creation and manipulation in Computing?
Relevant answer
Answer
I understand manipulation of data from the past. How will we manipulate data from the future? Further the analysis of data seems constrained by science and mathematics development. David Booth
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
I am planning to examine relationship between social media usage and consumer decision - making processes
Relevant answer
Answer
I believe the dependent variable is one however independent variables are 3. Yes, you may use SEM.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Noise is stated as the (deviation from mean) by (mean) in Kahneman et al., 2016.
Is there any work that extended this methodology further?
- Kahneman, D., Rosenfield, A. M., Gandhi, L., & Blaser, T. (2016). Noise. Harvard Bus Rev, 38-46.
Relevant answer
Answer
Read my thesis titled Systematic Modeling of Whitenoise with Financial Time Series in Decision Making and find out if it will be helpful by following the link below http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/72931/Shileche_Systematic?sequence=3.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
7 answers
Is it linear, vector or logarithmic normalization? Or some other normalization?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanh-Tuan Dang Thank you very much.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
4 answers
What is the purpose, usefulness and outcome of climatic simulations, particularly those of ecological LUC measures such as the Sahel afforestation ("Great Green Wall")?
How reliable are they and how can they have an impact on decision making? There are many simulations of the intended afforestation or restoration of the Sahel region, raising warning flags of heat waves and flooding since many years. However, we find that they are based on somewhat unrealistic, hydro-ecologically not feasible vegetational assumptions.
Now, after many years of simulations the most recent study (Camara et al, Atmosphere 2022, 13, 421) at least finds that reforestation should help to improve the climate over the reforested area. - Could scientific results have caused delays in starting badly needed restoration measures? Maybe even worse, as an indirect consequence have an affect on drought events?
Relevant answer
Answer
Land related factors contributie to climate change include through carbon dioxide emissions from loss of tropical forest, from degradation of ecosystems and soil; nitrous oxide emissions from excess fertilizer applied in farming; methane emissions from ruminants, rice farming, biomass burning and landfills etc. Responding to climate change involves two possible approaches: reducing and stabilizing the levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (“mitigation”) and/or adapting to the climate change already in the pipeline (“adaptation”).
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Can you share a sample study over python with TOPSIS method in multi-criteria decision making?
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
The introduction of smart foresight in the decision making process opens new possibilities for the decision making centers by upgrading aspects such as transparency, flexibility, risk aversion,, rate of adoption in both private and public sector, etc. Please comment
Relevant answer
Answer
Many tools, approaches, and techniques underpin foresight and futures studies and responses to this query will be a function of the case-by-case relevance of each to the five phases of a particular SMART foresight process (i.e., Scoping, Mobilizing, Anticipating, Recommending, Transforming). Not to forget, decision-making is not a monolithic enterprise and several decision-making styles exist: the options range from autocratic to unanimity-based decision making, each with its raison d'être and related pros and cons.
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
With extensive research into how Digital Economy practitioners and the associated audience would like to receive information to aid their buying decisions, are there expertise approaches to matching solid digital economy needs to customers' decision making process for the ultimate goal of Users' motivation to buy more and suppliers supplying robustly more?
Relevant answer
Answer
I expect this can be done by identifying needs, studying the market and analyzing customers. A model can be designed according to scientific standards
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
Let us discuss about the advantages, disadvantages, and use of powerful decomposition techniques like Bender's decomposition for large-scale optimization. I invite my esteemed colleagues and researchers to share important literature, ways of implementation, and potential application areas of decomposition algorithms, in this forum.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear R.K
You are right, we can't say no, because we don't know about new developments.
Probably, one of the reasons by which Bender's decomposition technique has not been applied to MCDM - and I share your opinion about its application - is because problems in MCDM are systems, and like that, they can't be partitioned, other than for study.
Your last paragraph resumes the same point, better than my sketchy explanation, so, we agree
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Fuzzy TOPSIS
Fuzzy VIKOR
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Alexandros
In my opinion, most MCDM methods allow for combining quantitative values with linguistics. For the latter, you have only to convert those linguistics expressions in numerical using an appropriate scale, even one of your invention. I would recommend just using the 0 -10 scale or the Likert scale.
Of course, it could be that original numerical, like 0.02, 0.8, 5067, etc, must be combined with the numbers 8,3, 5, etc., from converted linguistics, but it is a problem than can be easily solved by normalization
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
35 answers
Hello,
I am currently working on sensitivity analysis in the context of AHP. I use the online tool BPMSG from Goepel, maybe someone here knows it. However, I have a problem with the traceability of the results. Let's assume that there are exactly 3 criteria in the AHP (C1,C2,C3). Then I would like to know how the final value for an alternative (a1) results if one of the criteria changes in weighting, right?
I'll just say C1 decreases by x. However, the value x that is taken away from C1 must be distributed to C2 and C3. I just wonder which method is used to do this. Is x simply distributed equally to C2 and C3 or does this happen according to the share of C2 or C3 in the sum of C2 and C3?
When I do that, I get the following for the remaining two criteria:
(C1-x) = New C1
(C2 + (C2 / (C2 + C3)) * x) = New C2
(C3 + (C3 / (C2 + C3)) * x) = New C3
Unfortunately, however, I do not know if this is correct. If I multiply the criteria with the corresponding values of alternative a1 and combine the whole thing to a final value, I can calculate the same again with the other alternatives. When I compare the graphs to see how big x has to be to change the final prioritization of the alternatives, I always get the wrong values compared to the online tool. Therefore I would like to know if the redistribution of the weights is correct.
I hope someone can help me despite the long question. Thanks a lot!
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
2 answers
Dear Madam, Please advise about post Doc supervisors in the university in the field of educational data mining and learning analytics for strengthening university decision making. I will be grateful
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
3 answers
Quantumic made, with a demonstration of Half-Newtonian behavior!
what do you understand from this phrase? let me know or tag someone to disscuss.
Regards
Amir
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
5 answers
Petro-Sim and similar process simulation software may be an effective tool to be used in decision making. I need to know your experience in this field. Any examples or case studies will be useful and sharing them will be highly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, Mr. Salaheldin
I used petrosim software for simulation of petroleum refinery units of iranian refineries such as Catalytic Naphtha refoming (CRU - CCR), Naphtha hydrotreating, Hydrocracking and .... units about 15 years from 2005 until now.
I have several papers from that simulations in scientific journals.
Thanks
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
18 answers
I am looking for a dataset which contains the judgments of the decision-makers for the decision problem, as in the AHP method. The problem can be in any area.
Most datasets are related with classification, regression, and time series problems, such as energy, diseases etc.
Let me know. Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Marcos Antonio Alves
My book "Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method', Springer, addresses exactly what you are requesting.
In 130 pages you will find the comments and analysis of 105 researchers, including, of course, Saaty and his co-authors, Vargas and Harker
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
4 answers
I want to model churn prediction in the banking industry using operation research models. However, I have only secondary data obtained from a customer database.
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
12 answers
What the Impact of Risk Management on Decisions Making?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mr. Elshaikh!'
You raised an important topic to consider. I approach this question from a COVID-19 case - study view:
1) Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S. et al. Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 22, 107–132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00277-7 Open access:
2) A special study:
Gernelyn Logrosa et al. 2021. Integrating Risk Assessment and Decision-Making Methods in Analyzing the Dynamics of COVID-19 Epidemics in Davao City, Mindanao Island, Philippines, Risk Analysis An International Journal Early View, Free access:
Yours sincerely, Bulcsu Szekely
  • asked a question related to Decision Making
Question
11 answers
As it is known, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning methods are used today to produce meaningful information from big data. So how can the MCDM approach be integrated into such a structure? Is it healthy to use MCDM in big data?
Relevant answer