Science topic

DNA Purification - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in DNA Purification, and find DNA Purification experts.
Questions related to DNA Purification
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
10 answers
Hello,
I'm trying to clone some short genes *up* to 350 bp into an expression vector the clasiccal way. For this, I do PCR with Q5 and get (mostly) nice band. I cut it from the gel and purify using Macherey-Nagel kit.
I digest this DNA with BamHI and either HindIII or PstI. The first time I aimed at 2 ug, the second time I simply digested all DNA. I run the digested DNA on gel again and purify with the kit again.
After this I get low concentration (5-40 ng/ul) and often poor purity (A260/A230) way below 1.8 (I attached a picture of one such sample, where I had actually peak at 230 nm; that's one extreme). The concentration of plasmid is repeatadly in the range 6-10 ng/ul (it's 5.5 kbp).
Any idea, what could be the problem? In other projects, I usually have sufficient purity and reasonable yield after gel-purification.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Tomas,
You are right for your smaller fragments the RT elution buffer should be ok - however I don't think that it would compromise your smaller fragments if you heat your elution buffer and you could try this as well.
Regarding your question - if you have plenty of gel I would split it and not load on one column. As also Paul Rutland mentioned overloding of the column might is often not a good idea and NEB is recommending using small gel slices.
They also say, that these salt most likely will not interfere with downstream application (it the same with Macherey and Nagel) - however that you might overestimate the DNA concentration - for this reason I always did an agarose gel in addition. We have used especially the Monarch Kit in the lab (but also Macherey and Nagel) and cloning ususally worked well.
Regarding the second elution: concentration are often not really lower and sometime they could even be higher - so just try it.
And remember you don't need a lot of DNA for your cloning - I usually used 20 ng of vector which mean you would need around 0,4 ng of the 90 bp insert and 1,3 ng for 350 bp an equimolar concentration. This means that you will most likely dilute the concentration of chaotrophic salt significantly in the ligation reaction, even if your DNA concentration is not very high after clean up.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
What would be the best way to preserve exhumed human bones (in archaeological or forensic contexts) for downstream decontamination and genetic extraction + analysis?
For example, a specific analytical grade buffer or other chemical solution to submerge the specimen, the most ideal temperature (RT, -20C, -80C, etc.).
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Tatyana Laletin I think I can help you with this issue. Snedecker et al. (2025) just published a paper about downstream processing methods for challenging skeletal samples (https://www.fsigenetics.com/article/S1872-4973(24)00205-9/abstract).
If you wish to store the remains for future DNA extraction, you may consider materials listed here:
On the same note, Brock et al. (2018) (listed in my paper above), discuss reversible consolidation/restoration methods.
Best,
Maria
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
We have performed CHIP assay using magnetic bead CHIP assay kit (Cat: 9003, CST) and got desired band in agarose gel electrophoresis after the chromatin digestion. But when we went for RT-PCR did not get proper data. Can somebody suggest me how to troubleshoot this problem? After immunoprecipitation and DNA purification we got the DNA concentration 18 ng/ul. We did not get any amplification even in 2% input sample.
Relevant answer
Answer
Using similar kit, #56383 from cell signalling company and also following a similar protcol from Abcam X-Chip, i am always getting "DNA too low to be detected".
How did you get " concentration 18 ng/ul"?
Did you check if the fragmentation is proper and not over fragmented by the enzyme? This may lead to NO amplification even in 2% Input control.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I have issues with the 1D ligation protocol of the MinION sequencer when handling high molecular weight DNA (>50kb). There are several cleaning steps with AmpureXP beads and the DNA is so viscous that I can't properly recover the DNA (low recovery and substantial loss of HMW over LMW DNA). Sometimes the DNA clumps when mixed with the beads and most of the times DNA get stuck on the beads (the magnetic field is not strong enough to retain the beads when pipetting the solution). Does anyone have any tip to share please? Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Christoph Jans Also experiencing problems with this, please could you let me know what amount you mean by "another fraction of nuclease free water", assuming you mean when resuspending the DNA to increase the elution amount? (e.g. the protocol suggests 40ul, so use 60-80ul?)
Many thanks,
Lauren F
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
Hello,
I am currently facing challenges with DNA extraction and subsequent PCR amplification for barcoding insect beetles. I am using Chelex 100 resin for DNA extraction with the following protocol:
  1. DNA Extraction:180 µL of 5% Chelex in 1X TE buffer, 0.5 mM EDTA 20 µL of 20 mg/mL proteinase K Incubation at 56°C for 1 hour, followed by 99°C for 15 minutes Centrifugation at maximum speed for 5 minutes Careful collection of the supernatant However, the purity ratios (A260/280 and A260/230) measured via Nanodrop are about 1.0 and 1.5, respectively.
  2. Purification Attempt:Additional purification with cold 100% ethanol and sodium acetate Overnight incubation at -20°C Two additional washes with cold 70% ethanol Despite these steps, the purity did not improve significantly, resulting in A260/280 and A260/230 ratios of approximately 1.3 and 1.7.
  3. PCR Amplification: 25 µL of PCR reaction mix containing:5 µL of 5x Phire II Reaction Buffer (Thermo Fisher) 1 µL of each primer (10 pM) 0.5 µL of Phire Hot Start II DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher) 0.5 µL of dNTPs 1 µL of DNA template The amplification protocol:30 sec at 98°C 40 cycles: 5s at 98°C, 5s at 50°C, 15s at 72°C Final extension: 5 min at 72°C
I am looking for insights or suggestions on how to improve DNA purity and enhance the efficiency of my PCR reactions. Additionally, any advice on barcoding from the article "Barcode 100K Specimens: In a Single Nanopore Run" would be highly valuable. Could the low purity ratios be affecting my PCR efficiency, and how can I optimize my protocol for better results?
Add aditional infromation about primers.
Best regards, Benediktas
Relevant answer
Answer
How are you disrupting/grinding your samples? With just 200 microliters, these must be really small samples so you'll want to make sure you grind them really well. You can increase the proteinase K digest time & give the samples a quick flick to mix during the digest.
For PCR, I know it sounds counter-intuitive, but you can often get a higher success rate if you dilute out the DNA 1:10 or 1:100. That will dilute out PCR-inhibitors, but still leave more than enough DNA. I noticed you are only adding 1 microliter of DNA. It is challenging to use that tiny of a volume - easy to accidentally miss a sample, pipet onto the side & not in the reaction, etc. I'd recommend diluting the DNA so you can add a larger & easy to measure volume, say 5 microliters. Just reduce the volume of water in the PCR mix so the concentrations are correct.
That is a *really* fast PCR protocol. How small is your expected product? Is your positive control robust?
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
I have used the QIAGEN DNeasy kit to obtain fecal prey DNA from an herbivore and a few of the samples have higher polyphenol levels, which have given a yellowish tint to the final eluted DNA solution.
Should I go ahead with Geneclean (suitable for 200–20 kb) DNA purification from solutions or the traditional ethanol and sodium acetate precipitation to remove the PCR inhibitors in the form of polyphenols and other plant secondary metbolites?
Relevant answer
Answer
column methods lose a lot of material so I would go for phenol chloroform extraction the salt/alcohol precipitation maybe adding a small amount of glycogen to ensure that all of the dna precipitates. If you do decide to go with dna binding columns then you can increase the yield aby addig twice as much elution buffer and also heating the elution buffer to 70c before using ir
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
Dear colleagues
I have a GeneRead QIACube station which is specified for no longer supported Qiagen NGS GeneReader workflow (emulsion technology). It looks pretty much the same as casual QIACube, but has other worktable and screen. I just can't put a standard reagent tray into the device.
Is it possible to convert GeneRead QIACube (NGS sample preparation) into a QIACube for NA isolation?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi …
Here are some considerations:
Potential Options
_Contact Qiagen:The best approach would be to contact Qiagen directly. They can provide specific guidance on whether any modifications can be made or if there are any recommended workflows for your device.
_Modification: If you're technically inclined, you might explore whether you can modify the reagent tray or worktable to fit standard trays. However, this could void warranties or cause operational issues.
_Alternative Solutions: If conversion is not feasible, consider using the GeneRead QIACube for its intended purpose or investing in a standard QIACube designed specifically for nucleic acid isolation.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
9 answers
I'm currently working on gel purification in order to get DNA fragment for T4 ligation. But I have been able to take only 8.5ng/μl as a highest concentration of DNA fragment. And could not get ligated plasmid with that fragment and other fragment(other fragment have high concentration, good waveform on nano drop so I don't think the fragment is a cause of failure on T4 ligation.).
Feel free to ask me question for my experiment.
Thank you.
Support information : I will show my protocol briefly as a example for DNA fragment which I could get highest concentration. I cut 4μg of plasmid with enzyme and did electrophoresis them and separated DNA fragment. The band was clear and cut band on edge. I did gel purification with them.
Expected DNA fragment length is about 8600bp. I tried elusion method with warm elusion buffer(70℃) and put column on 70℃ for 5 min just before centrifuge. I'm using E.coli DH5α for transformation of ligated plasmid.
P.S.
I changed only competent cell strain for my protocol and I could take colonies. Result of colony PCR suggests that I may get optical plasmid. Of course, I will do sequencing later for my plasmid. (2024/8/8)
Relevant answer
Answer
Umay Ece Tugcu Thank you for your reply!
I forgot to add later progress. After that, I changed only competent cell strain for my protocol and I could take colonies. Result of colony PCR suggests that I may get optical plasmid. Of course, I will do sequencing later for my plasmid.
I used T4 ligase from TaKaRa and used their protocol(written in Japanese). And I used E. coli HST08 from TaKaRa which is competent cell for long plasmid. You can also use In-fusion for ligation which is said better at ligation than T4 ligase in my lab.
I hope it can help you!
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
Using INTRON's DNA-spin Plasmid DNA purification kit to extract plasmids from specific E.Coli strains, my team and I have encountered numerous plasmid dimerizations that lead to over-weighted plasmid DNAs which are hard to identify whether they are the wanted plasmids or other common impurities. We have followed the protocol given by the producer but have not achieved notable success under our lab conditions and we are needing help right now.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are sure the strain is RecA- then you should not be getting dimers if the plasmid is a monomer to begin with. What makes you think you are seeing dimers?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I have extracted historic DNA from animal tissue using the Qiagen DNeasy kit and eluted the DNA in the provided elution buffer, which contains EDTA. I will perform whole genome sequencing on an Illumina platform. Because of the low DNA yield, I will utilize the TrueSeq Nano or Microplex prep kit. These library prep kits are sensitive to EDTA. I must therefore cleanup the extracts and use an EDTA-free elution buffer. What approach should I use for the cleanup? 
I will avoid AMPure cleanup due to the small peak sizes (<150 bp) in my DNA templates. Grateful for all suggestions!  
Relevant answer
Answer
Jarl A Anmarkrud Hi can you assist in what worked with you? I have the same issue in some bacterial samples
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I currently need to purify DNA after plasmid linearization. I am using the TaKaRa DNA purification kit, but the concentration of the diluent obtained from each DNA purification is very low. Do you have any other recommended kits?
Relevant answer
Answer
Most dna purification kits use the same technology and all give low purified dna yields. You can often increase the yield by heating the elution buffer to 70c and put it on the membrane for twice as long as the kit recommends. Then do the same elution again with new hot elution buffer and this should increase your yield
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I typically extract DNA from whole blood using a Qiagen kit link here: https://www.qiagen.com/ja-us/products/discovery-and-translational-research/dna-rna-purification/dna-purification/genomic-dna/qiaamp-dna-blood-kits/ (RBC lysis, cell lysis, then within 2 years, protein precipitation, DNA precipitation after adding isopropanol, wash with ethanol, rehydrate DNA). I want to extract DNA from PBMCs which have been frozen in aliquots of 5 million cells in media comprised of 90% FBS, 10% DMSO. I've tried this before by thawing the PBMCs and proceeding onto the cell lysis step in my normal DNA extraction protocol but have had no success. Can anyone offer tips on how to extract DNA from frozen PBMCs? Thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Can anyone share me protocol and qiazen kit used for extraction of genomic DNA from frozen PBMCs
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
We used the DNA Clean & Concentrator-100 (D4030) from Zymo Research to clean and concentrate our 100 µg DNA. Unfortunately, our yield was only 8%.
We initially believed that, due to our DNA being over 10 kb, it was not eluted properly from the column. However, upon checking the DNA in the flow-through and wash samples at each step, we discovered that most of our DNA did not bind to the column. Specifically, 90% of our DNA existed in the flow-through. When we applied the flow-through containing this DNA to another company's DNA binding column, most of the DNA bound well to the column. Consequently, we suspect there is a problem with the DNA binding column of the Zymo kit.
Has anyone had a similar experience? If so, how did you resolve the problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have a similar problem. Obtaining 4% of original midiprep plasmid dna from this kit. Any updates on fixing this issue?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I am trying to clone a large (11kb) and toxic gene in an expression vector. Therefore, I am using the EPI400 CopyCutter strain that is maintaining the plasmid at a low copy number to allow bacteria growth. Attached is the protocol for this strain.
I have to grow the bacteria on plate at 28 C for 2 to 3 days to be able to get colonies.
I did a colony PCR and got 20 positive colonies.
When I put them in liquid culture (5mL to 10mL), some colonies never grown, even at 28 C. Some of them did grow (2 days incubation 28C, 250rpm in aeration culture tube, OD600 above 2.0), but then I only get a really low yield after induction of the high copy production in 100mL culture in flasks.
I tried this several times but still got a really low yield (10ng/uL, maximum 15).
I used this strain for other toxic genes and was able to get more than 40ng/uL (which is around what I need to be able to sequence my plasmid and verify the correct insertion of my gene).
I am using this kit for plasmid extraction Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification Systems
Any suggestions on how I could improve my plasmid yield?
Any suggestions to be able to grow the bacteria in liquid culture after getting them selected on the plate?
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
To optimize plasmid DNA yield when working with toxic genes:
  1. Consider using a lower copy number plasmid backbone to reduce the burden on host cells.
  2. Adjust induction conditions to balance gene expression and cell growth.
  3. Replace the promoter with a weaker or less toxic one, if possible.
  4. Experiment with different growth temperatures to find the optimal balance.
  5. Utilize competent cells with enhanced tolerance to toxic proteins.
  6. Employ an iterative culturing approach to allow cells to adapt to toxicity over time.
  7. Monitor cell density and harvest cells at the optimal density for plasmid yield.
  8. Ensure efficient cell recovery during plasmid isolation to maximize yield while minimizing DNA damage.
By implementing these strategies, you can improve plasmid DNA yield while working with toxic genes, such as when using CopyCutter EPI400. Experimentation and optimization may be necessary to find the best approach for your specific gene and experimental setup.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
9 answers
I am getting zero DNA yield after using qiagen purification columns. I finally traced the problem to NEBuffer 3.1, but pH doesn't seem to the cause.
Essentially, I observe:
3 ug of DNA in 50 uL of water ->
qiagen purification column ->
1.5-2.3 ug of DNA
In comparison:
3 ug of DNA, 5 uL of 10X NEBuffer 3.1, bring to 50 uL with water ->
qiagen purification column ->
zero DNA
I thought it was a pH problem -- high pH can cause low efficiency. But I don't think pH is the problem. Because pH strips and qiagen's pH indicator say my pH is okay (pH<7). And I added 20 uL of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5) and it doesn't fix the low yield at all. I observe:
3 ug of DNA, 5 uL of 10X NEBuffer 3.1, bring to 50 uL with water ->
Add 20 uL of 3 M sodium acetate (pH5) ->
qiagen purification column ->
zero DNA
Why does adding NEBuffer 3.1 cause low yield if not pH problems?
Relevant answer
Answer
I added 3 M NaAc pH5 and the purification still didn't work. Still 0% recovery.
I used pH strips too. The pH is low but still 0% recovery.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
I am looking for a protocol which I can get the purified DNA from FTA cards easily and inexpensively.
Then I want to use TE buffer instead of using buffer AT, ATL.
The thing I want to know is that if buffer TE can work instead of buffer AT, ATL or not.
Relevant answer
Answer
ATL is a lysis buffer which has SDS and EDTA in it and is not recommended for long term storage.
AL has guanidine hydrochloride and malic acid to denature proteins.
TE is Tris/EDTA so uses tris to maintain the pH and EDTA to chelate metal ions which would damage the DNA.
A crude method for getting some DNA for PCR might simply be to boil the cards in some distilled water for 15 mins.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Good morning everyone!
I am a Biotechnology student and I am doing a project to verify the biocontrol capacity of actinobacteria, for this I must carry out the molecular identification of the strains.
Is it advisable to use any of these DNA extraction and purification kits?
- Wizard® HMW DNA Extraction Kit from PROMEGA
- Invitrogen™ PureLink™ Microbiome DNA Purification Kit
Is another type of kit more recommendable?
Relevant answer
Answer
Does not matter. Use the kit which suits you in terms of cost, availability etc.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I am currently working in the process of automating our research lab to be able to process a higher number of samples. Our work consists in detecting and quantifying pathogens in mammalian samples (e.g., blood, faeces, tissue, swabs). As such, I am interested in an automated extraction system which produces good DNA/RNA yields to be sent for NGS.
Until now, we have been using Qiagen kits for our manual extractions, so I thought that a machine from the same brand would do for us. However, I've been told that the QIAcube Connect does not really take that much work out of your hands, and that the sample volume obtained at the end of the process with the QIAcube HT is way lower than the one with the manual kit. I have also checked other machines, such as Thermo Scientific's Kingfisher Flex and its kits, but do not know how well they do in comparison with Qiagen's kits.
Based on your experience, which automated extraction system would you recommend? And which brand of kits have you used with it? The system and kits do not need to be from the brands mentioned here (as long as the produce good results).
Thank you very much in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Laia-M. Pardinilla back when i worked in the diagnostic laboratory, i used CyBio Felix from AnalyticJena. It is also based on magnetic beads technology and it is fully automated, you can modify the program, customize configurations.. and we had two of them, so we could process 192 samples at once, i really liked that one https://www.analytik-jena.com/products/liquid-handling-automation/liquid-handling/flexible-benchtop-liquid-handling/cybio-felix-series/
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
7 answers
Amplified PCR product is clear as 1 band in gel. but Ethanol precipitation or magnetic beads purification of same PCR product resulted in extra unknown band. why?
Relevant answer
Answer
Could it be a primer dimer. This is very common in PCR products. This happens when you have too many primers as compared to what is required.
Or could your DNA be broken down or slightly denatured while isolation?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I'm a grad student working on metagenomics and I ran into some issues with the samples. I collected urine samples and extracted DNA using DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit. I used NanoDrop to measure DNA concentration and ran into different issues. The problem is that the A260/280 level is too low (not to mention the contamination) and I don't know how to increase the purity level. I don't think I can collect the samples again, or at least it will take a while before I can do that again. Is there a way or a kit I can use to increase the purity level of my DNA extracts without significantly lowering DNA concentration?
Relevant answer
Answer
Péter Gyarmati I will try again with Qubit, but regardless of contaminations, most samples have purification level that does not meet the requirement. I may have to alter the sequencing method. Thank you for the recommendations.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
lac promoter is widely used in plasmids. It seems strange plasmid vector for DNA purification contains the CAP binding site and lac promoter. Both pLKO.1 puro(https://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence/333600/) and lentiCRISPR v2(https://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence/244694/) but not pLL3.7(https://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence/237575/) contain the lac promoter.
so is it safe to delete the cap binding site and lac promoter sequence in lentivirus vector, or even in some other mammalian expression plasmid like pcdna3(https://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence_vdb/2092/)?
Relevant answer
Answer
Junzhou Wu I‘ll give a try on retroviral/lentiviral vectors.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I wonder if anyone knows how to use sample release reagent from Sansure Biotech ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
The supplier claims that their "sample release reagent" (nucleic acid release technology), can lyse pathogens at room temperature very fast, with no need to heating, centrifuging or replacing tubes, the sample DNA/RNA can be extracted quickly through simple operations. The reagent is applied for the pretreatment of nucleic acid molecules, to release them from specimens, then the released nucleic acids can be used for clinical in vitro diagnosis or for the detection through appropriate apparatus.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
Hi,
Recently, our workflow stated below has stopped working.
-Sample Prep-
Swabs taken from mouldy plasterboard.
1. DNA extracted using Genomic DNA purification Kit and eluted into gDNA elution buffer. (2ng/uL)
-Whole Genome Amplification-
2. 1uL samples amplified using UltraFast REPLi-G Mini Kit. (1.5ug/uL)
-T7 endonuclease treatment-
3.7uL amplified sample + 3uL NEB Buffer 2 + 1.5uL Endonuclease T7+ 20.5uL diH2O 4. 15 mins @ 37 degrees 5. 18uL TE Buffer 6. 35uL AMPure XP 7. Magnetic bead clean-up (2x 80% EtOH washes) 8. Elute into 50uL diH2O <----- LOSE ALL OF OUR DNA (<1ng/uL remaining!)
-Nanopore Sequencing-
We have replaced all chemicals/ reagents from buffers to AMPureXP beads and nothing seems to work.
We have increased ethanol washes from 70% to 80% to ensure the DNA isn't being eluted off too early.
We have tried replacing the AMPureXP beads and alternative SPRI beads but the results are the same (no DNA!).
AMPureXP beads work for the clean up step during ONT RBK004 sample prep.
We have tried messing around with the pH of TE Buffer, from pH4 to pH8, to see if the DNA binding to the beads is influenced but this doesn't seem to help.
Any ideas? Has anyone overcome any similar issues with AMPureXP beads?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Faye,
Were you able to troubleshoot this issue ?
Same problem here, we re digesting amplified genome for Naopore seq.
amplifying genome using GenomePhi (fragments from 200bp to over 10 kb)
Using 1ug of DNA + 5 or 10 U of endonuclease, in final volume of 20 ul. 1H at 37C. we have more than 75 % of DNA loss after digestion and AMPure purification,
We tried column purification instead of AMPure but is worser.
we tried this:
- amplified GenomePhi DNA alone + AMPure = good yield
- Amplified GenomPhi + T7 endonuclease + AMPure = >75 % loss
-a negative control without T7 endonuclease (just 1ug of amplified DNA and buffer) + AMPure : >75 % loss
I think something wrong with T7 buffer that is not compatible with purification Step, or the amplicon ?
Thank you
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
After adding resuspension buffer and lysis buffer to the cell pellet, the next step is the addition of neutralisation buffer which requires immediate mixing. The expected outcome is the formation of large, fluffy and white precipitate. Slight delay in mixing results in the formation of small floating precipitate which remains suspended despite doubling of centrifugation duration, resulting in the decrease of A260:A280 eventually.
What are the remedies to solve this issue and improve the DNA purity? The DNA is plasmid DNA. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Honestly, it might be faster to just start over and follow the instructions. I'm sure you have more overnight culture than you needed.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hi!
I am about to use 95% formamide, 10mM EDTA buffer to elute biotinalyted DNA from streptavidin bead. So should I just simply add 1ml of 1M EDTA, 4ml of water and 95 ml of formamide to present 100ml of the elution buffer?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
Hi everyone
I'm processing some leaf samples collected in different rivers for shotgun metagenomic sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq 6000).
The company that will sequence my DNA samples (Novogene in UK) requires a 260/280 ratio =1.8-2.0 (no degradation or RNA contamination).
(Novogene webpage:
But I've sent samples in the past (to the same company but for amplicon sequencing) with 260/280 = 1.7-1.8 and they passed the quality control and went full analysis.
Regarding the 260/230 ratio, they do not refer any requirement but my 260/230 ratios are even lower (the lowest is 0.6).
I'm using the DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Quiagen).
So my question is, how low can these ratios be for shotgun metagenomic sequencing?
What's the limit?
I know that I will probably have to clean some samples but I just want to have an idea to help me select the ones I definitely have to clean.
Thanks a lot!!!
Relevant answer
Answer
First you have plants sample is Wash carefully and after that extract prepared and then filter the method for the concentration of, removal and enumeration of bacteria in liquid and air to avoid contamination of microorganisms for example fungi and then used other filtration method Sach as centrifugation.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
I've been having some trouble with RNA contamination after plasmid extraction with the Qiagen mini-prep kit.
The 260/280 ratio looks fine after extraction, and I have been having this problem only with 2 out of my 6 plasmid samples with the same bacterial strain.
What could be the reason for RNA contamination aside from excessive starting material, expired RNase, and RNA contamination of buffers?
Also, I would appreciate any kind of tricks that you personally use to avoid RNA contamination.
Relevant answer
Answer
Paul Weber Maybe your RNase might be the issue. I have never got RNA contamination using Qiagen Miniprep Kits. Please, recheck if you have added RNase provided in the kit to P1 solution, if you have added it then RNase might be faulty. You can add more RNase to P1 or go for a separate RNase treatment step after your plasmid extraction. All the very best for your experiments.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I purified about 5 uL of amplicon from about 1 month ago, but after running the quantititation gel, I don't have enough remaining to ideally perform my downstream applications (Sanger sequencing). I still have remaining amplicon which I have now purified once again using EXOSAP-IT. Should I run quantititation gels on this product as well, to confirm the concentrations? Ideally, I would like to simply rely on the results of my first quantititation gel from this amplicon.
The amplicon has been sitting in a +4 fridge for about a month, undisturbed. Please let me know if there's any additional information or details I can provide to help inform an answer - thank you in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Exo SAP purified pcr products having less chances of degradation when we stored our products at particular temp like +4°c , Usually it will stable for days to months when your confident with ur product concentration and purity. You need not to perform any quantitative checks again and again. Better you can run gel after cyclic pcr to ensure your product. Then go for a Sanger sequencing. All the best
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I am currently working doing a lot of N/N 2D gel electrophoresis for investigating replication structures in yeast. We might invest in a bead beater, which can handle a specific volume, but I am afraid that bead beating instead of vortexing will shred the DNA structures. Vortexing is time consuming, hence considering.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your reply. Available protocols says to use powerful vortexer as I am already doing. I am still curious to chat with someone, who tried it out.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
My experiment requires to extract Tissue DNA from zebrafish intestine , this is my first time to learn Tissue DNA extraction. Recently I have learned about extracting DNA using magnetic beads, but i need more recommendations and and what is your experience about magnetic DNA extraction technique and how many samples can be extracted from single kit. Beside this , please can you suggest me any other methods that follow more simple steps.
Relevant answer
Answer
Check out Qiagen
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
Hi RG members,
I found NTB buffer suitable to extract chromatin in buffer containing 1% SDS used for ChIP-seq experiments. I am wondering if anyone knows what is the composition of NTB buffer.
Best,
BS
Relevant answer
Answer
Follow the link below and you can get the answer
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hi everyone. I know it sounds weird but I was doing a midi (qiagen) prep yesterday and just after the last centrifugation, all isopropanol-eluted DNA just dissapeared. I saw the cloudy phase forming before the centrifugation step and when it finished I literally saw no pellet at all. My best guess Is that pellet was formed but is really llittle and I just didn't see it.Any opinions? I kept the tube at -20°c for trying again on Monday. Thanks again if anyone can share their theory about this !
Relevant answer
Answer
It May be a reagent problem. You can troubleshoot the purification by taking an aliquot of every binding and wash eluate from the column. Precipitate a sample of each using iso propanol and you should see which step is not behaving as it should and you can investigate the reagent concerned
It is possible that you have a small and invisible precipitate so dissolve the residue that you have and measure its OD260. Perhaps you simply do not have much plasmid
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I work with voltage-gated sodium channels, which are a pain to clone into high-copy number plasmids. Recently I have acquired the pBI-CMV1 vector, which is a low-copy number vector, and it has really helped with the cloning. However, when it comes to DNA purification, I have had lots of issues. Sometimes the DNA yields are extremely poor (I mean barely detectable by Nanodrop), despite longer growth periods and increased culture volumes/lysis buffers (Qiagen) compared to high-copy number plasmids. What is most worrying is that I often get a high level of "smeariness" when I run miniprep/midiprep pBI-CMV1 DNA on an agarose gel. It's not one distinct form of contamination; it's more of a background smear/smudge that stretches across all DNA sizes on the gel (and this can be seen even without adding restriction enzymes). It makes Nanodrop yields deceptively high and ruins the DNA for downstream applications like transfection. I'm not quite sure what's causing it, as I've never seen it with my other cloning/expression plasmids. I do not use endA+ bacterial strains for cloning. Has anyone worked with pBI-CMV1 before? Or has anybody encountered a similar problem with a different plasmid and been able to resolve/minimise it?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Jose Enrique Gonzalez-Prada it just a matter of definition as what is their cutoff for low or medium. Upon further inspection of this plasmid I noticed there are two cmv promoters in it. Some viral promoters (such as CMV) do have an activity in E.coli check ref below. Plasmids that have active promoters without a proper bacterial terminator in it tend to produce lower yield (at least in my hands). As I said before extensive growing or up scaling the reaction might lead to increase genomic DNA contamination if your extraction. As an alternative approach try to do multiple mini-preps pool then ethanol precipitate (redo the transformation just to be sure). Hope this helps.
ref:
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Is it ok to use water for injection (WFI) instead of ddh2o for molecular biology work, such as pcr or dna purification?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is certainly OK, but probably a waste of money. Water for injection is guaranteed pyrogen (endotoxins)-free, which is not a worry for most molecular biology applications. Distilled or reverse osmosis water is fine; prior autoclaving takes care of inactivating nucleases.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Every time I try to isolate DNA, it ends with a smear like band on gel, or the pellet obtained is very little. Currently I am using a protocol which requires 2 days to isolate DNA.  If possible please suggest a protocol that enables isolation within the same day.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for nice queries. Total genomic DNA (gDNA) from milk could be extracted using different protocols including automated platform like Maxwell 16 (Promega). See the the latest protocols in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.039.
Howver, for RNA extraction, milk should be collected aseptically, and transported to the Laboratory keeping in a RNA later solution. The extraction of RNA from milk somatic cells or else using different cutting-edge protocols. See the protocols in the following manuscript: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11184; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0955-8.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I am preparing 4C library but i think there is a problem of excess amount of DTT of ligase buffer that interferes with evaluation of DNA concentration by nanodrop.
Because for doing PCR of 4C library we need to know the exact con. of DNA so,i am looking for a extra or updated technique to remove or decrease the DTT content before, during or after 4C library purification.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have read in a paper regarding use of dialysis to remove low molecular weight contaminants. Haven’t used it myself. It was a suggestion.
Kindly refer
J Microbiol Methods 2006 66 (1): 21-31
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
9 answers
Hi everyone,
I need to clone in pGEM-T vector the result of amplifying a metagenomic library by PCR with a high fidelity polymerase but I only want to clone the fragments of an specific size (1-4kb). The rest is not interesting. I was thinking about:
-Purifiying this PCR product
-Do a A-tailing
-Run an agarose gel to cut the band of the desired size
-Perform pGEM-T clonning
I am not sure if A-tailing will survive the whole gel process. Any idea or help with this?
Thank you so much beforehand.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, A-tailing will survive after electrophoresis. Purify the PCR product and perform the A-tailing reaction at 72 degree for 10 mins. Perform ligation with pGEMT vectore only after purification.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
I need to extract large amounts of plasmid DNA for transfection into mammalian cell lines with as little as possible enterotoxins and I usually use the Qiagen Endofree plasmid maxi kit for the extraction. When doing miniprep with the Qiagen plasmid miniprep kit extractions to select colonies for the maxiprep I get excellent yields of over 300ng/ul with a 60ul elution. Since returning to the lab in 2021 I have tried a PureLink™ HiPure Plasmid DNA Purification Kit and the Qiagen Endofree plasmid maxi kit and got less plasmid out of these kits than from the miniprep kit.
Do you have a possible reason for the low yields and suggestions for me to improve the yields
Relevant answer
Answer
Look, the goal of the plasmid prep is to create plasmid as a reagent for your experiments.
Don't waste time trying to get the absolute highest yield (saving fractions, etc.). Go for "good enough is good enough" so you can continue with your actual project. If you can get enough plasmid from the mini preps, then just do the mini prep.
Also, remember to freeze aliquots of your plasmid so that you can avoid the degradation from multiple freeze-thaw cycles.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
9 answers
Dear Respectable Scientists,
I have been trying to extract DNA from above mentioned sources using different CTAB/SDS Buffer Compositions and purifying agents but I am not able to extract DNA from roots of :
- Dactylorhiza incarnata
- Bergenia ciliata
- Smilax china
- Nannoglottis hookeri
And Barks like:
- Cinnamomum verum
- Santalum album
And Galls like:
- Tamarix indica
- Quercus infectoria
- Pistacia chinensis
I want to use DNA EXT Kits except DNEasy that are a little cheap and please recommend any.
Please share your valuable experience to solve my problem.
Thanks in anticipation.
Kind Regards
Relevant answer
Answer
I think your method was excellent only modified for brtter ph of extraction procedure
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
12 answers
My PCR product has smear when I run it in the gel. I would like to use purification kit and run it again. Is this way useful for removing the smear?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi! I need help with this too.
How did you remove the smear exactly? Did you purify by using gel extraction (cutting the desired band in the gel)?
That picture you posted is before you used your PCR product as a template right?
If I used the purified PCR product as a template for a PCR to increase DNA yield?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
Hi everyone,
I perform a PCR + Restriction Digestion (single cut, same at both sides) over a metagenomic library. After that, I am trying to purifiy DNA fragments between 1-4kbp long from the smear I obtain after running the PCR in an agarose gel. Agarose gel is 0.8% and I run it at 100V 40 minutes. I carefully cut the band between 1-4kb and the yield or DNA recovery is quite good. The problem is that, after cloning it and taking a look at the size of the inserts, 90% of them are much smaller than 1kb.
What would be the best DNA Electrophoresis conditions (% agarose, Voltage, time ...) in order to maximize the separation between 1-4kb fragments from the smaller ones?
I believe that even a small quantity of small fragments after purification will be over represented after cloning protocol so, every tip in order to get rid of them as much as possible will be very welcome.
For tIn the ligation step I tried different ratios vector/insert (3:1 ,1:1 and 1:3) and temperatures (RT, 16 and 4ºC). The size distribution is basically the same.
Thanks a lo beforehand
Jorge
Relevant answer
Answer
Can your restriction enzyme bind to the DNA fragments after digestion? Check the information provided by the manufacturer. If that is the case, use DNA loading buffer containing SDS in order to disrupt the protein DNA-interaction so you make sure that bands that run between the markers 1kb and 4kb are actually fragments larger than 1kb.
Good luck
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
Does anyone know the composition of the Buffer MP that comes with the Qiagen M13 purification kit? I gather by the MSDS that citric acid is a major component.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I work as a lab tech prepping university classes; I don't get a lot of opportunity to get some microbiology experience, and I thought I would take advantage of the extra down time we have since the semester was ended early.
I took on a little project of seeing what kind of bacteria are growing on my pet chinchilla. I do not know what the bacteria is.
I have 5 samples; 4 are gram-positive coccus bacteria and one is a gram-negative rod bacteria after doing a gram stain. The 4 coccus bacteria are circular colonies, ranging from white-ivory-orange. The rod bacteria appears to be a rhizoid colony that is semi-transparent (these were all grown on YPD agar plates).
I just followed the Qiaprep spin mini prep protocol where I used 2mL of bacteria to extract DNA. Because I am unsure what exactly the bacteria is, I decided to do the step where you wash the spin column with 500uL of Buffer PB.
What should my agarose gel and DNA sample that I load look like? I want to see if the extraction was successful.
This is my second attempt at DNA extraction for this project; the first time I ran a 2% agarose gel with sybrsafe at 180V for 40 minutes, using 6uL of a 1KB ladder and 1uL 6X LD/5uL DNA sample (extracted from 1mL of culture) and only got a single, extremely faint band. I thought maybe the sample was too little, so I tried it again at 3uL 6x LD/15uL DNA sample but got the same result.
I've been able to understand and kind of make my own protocol up till now; I'm proud of myself for doing a successful gram staining, considering it was my first time ever trying it (btw, neutral red seems to be an alternative counterstain if you have no safranin or fuchsine available). I just don't have a lot of experience working out these kinds of problems (hence why I'm trying this). Is there something I'm doing wrong here and how should I proceed to get a successful DNA extraction?
Relevant answer
Answer
About 10ng of dna in a single band is visible with ethidium bromide dye. Smaller amounts are possible with small combs,single band and short runs and better dyes . The problem with genomic dna is that either it is intacct so very large and never leaves the well of the gel just giving a bright stain on the anode side of the well having gone nowhere or that it is degraded by enzymatic and mechanical shearing so is randomly spread over a wide size range and no individual part of the smear is visible unless you load large amounts of degraded dna. The presence of dna is usually measured on a spectrometer at 260nm and its purity from protein contamination given by the ration of OD260/280 which should be about 1.8 for pure dna
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I just bought a plasmid from addgene, the name is DMP1-GFPtopaz.
However, I could not extract the vector DNA by using Qiagen DNA purification kits from the bacteria.
the bacteria growth was very well at 30 ug/ml carbenicillin.
I know the vector is very big.
I wish someone has handled this plasmid and can give me some suggestions to fix this problem.
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Abhijeet Singh carb can be use instead of ampicillin for selection for AmpR it is just more stable.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hello !
I would like to extract gDNA for soil to do NGS. We have the QIAGEN Powersoil kit. I did it twice now. First, according the kit instruction : concentration = 10 ng/uL, 260/280 = 1.4, 260/230 = 0.7. And the second time, I changed the lysis step by vortexing for a longer period and I heated the elution buffer at 50C as ssen on other discussion but my results are still not that good : concentration = 10 ng/uL, 260/280 = 1.8, 260/230 = 0.8.
Do you maybe have an idea on how I can improve my ration to send the sample for NGS?
Thank you !!
Relevant answer
Answer
The 260/280 and 260/230 ratios are indicators of the quality of your DNA, but if they are lower than 1.8 it does not mean that your DNA is not suitable for PCR amplification or sequencing. I suggest to perform a PCR with bacteria or fungal universal primers to check if there are PCR inhibitors. If the PCR works you should be fine as the quality of the DNA is sufficient enough for downstream procedure.
If the PCR does not work try to dilute your DNA (e.g 1:10 or 1:20 or more) and then test it again via PCR. I had ratios similar to yours but after diluting the DNA template 1:20 my PCR worked fine.
You can also add beta-mercaptoethanol 1% or Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to the lysis buffer to remove polysaccharides and polyphenols. Use the lysis buffer together with bead-beating procedure.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
We are extracting DNA from frozen (a few years old) human blood samples using a Qiagen mini and blood mini kit. We usually get okay to good yields afterwards on the Qubit (anywhere between 10 ng/ul-over 100 ng/ul, its been fairly inconsistent). We then usually try to run PCR on our DNA yields that are higher. The primers we are using are all between 200-300 bp and we have a general but slightly altered PCR cycle for them. Our gel results are inconsistent, sometimes look great but sometimes nothing will show up or bands will be really faint. Our purification using a Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification kit has never had a very good yield. The most we have gotten from it is around 10 ng/ul according to the Qubit, but usually we get under 5. We need at least 20 for sequencing. We have tried a ton of things but are really at a loss right now for what could be causing these problems.
Relevant answer
Answer
What percentage of agarose are they using the gels? What loading buffer are you using? Have you tried using the same samples on different gels looking for variation?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I spiked in 4-8 log CFU/ml of Lactococcus lactis into milk, and use DNeasy Powered Food Kit to extract DNA from it. Nanodrop 2000 was used to determine the values. The yield and quality are weird: the concentration of DNA was only 0.5-1.6 ng/ul, and 260/230 is 0.11 to 0.58. Both I and the lab assistants got similar results. We followed exactly the manufacturer's protocol.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I am simply trying to obtain high yields of DNA from fish scales (they are tiny, like 1mm each).
The idea would be to obtain a good amount of DNA with fragments of 4KB at least for amplification of mitochondrial genome.
As a reference, the Wizard SV 96 Genomic DNA purification system (Promega) results in very low concentrations of DNA (average per sample is inferior to 10ng/µL in a 75µL elution volume and seems highly degraded on agarose gel).
I am looking for a scalable approach (I still have hundreds of samples to extract) but I can afford to buy relatively expensive extraction kits or others if necessary.
So, what would be the best method for you?
Many thanks for your participation to the discussion, and I hope it can be useful to others too.
Have a good day,
Noé Barthelemy
Relevant answer
Answer
Following this interesting question
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I am using the 30-uL QIA gel purification kit, and each time I test the product on a nanodrop after, the 260/230 is in the 0.01-0.30 range. Subsequent reactions, like ligations have issues with extremely low efficiency. I typically elute with 30uL H2O. Asking around has lead me to believe that this means there is too much salt in my samples.
A Zymo Clean&Concentrate protocol afterwards typically works, but there's inevitable some sample lost when adding in extra steps like this.
I've tried all the usual recommendations (extra binding buffer wash, let wash buffer rest a few minutes at RT, extra ethanol wash, elute with warmed H2O), but nothing has worked so far.
Can anyone help me out with this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Interesting question with great insights. Looking forward to the discussion!
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hi!
I use pyridine borane to react with DNA. I observed that DNA recovery on the purification stage after pyridine borane reaction is very low, at 10%. Therefore, I would like to kindly ask you about the following:
Does pyridine borane fragment genomic DNA?
Does it affect the efficiency of DNA binding to the column bed during purification?
Does anyone recommend a suitable purification method and tested binding buffers or other suggestions to improve DNA recovery?
Additionally, I have a question, the pyridine borane solution with DNA is shaken for 16h 850rpm, but I wonder if I can mix with vortex before incubation for better distribution of the substance in the solution?
I will be grateful for all suggestions.
Relevant answer
Answer
I will only note that Watson and Crick's model is wrong: the two DNA strands are not twisted, but run in parallel. See my article DNA: the Double Helix or the Ribbon Helix?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I have some plasmids with sacB. Ecoli carrying these plasmids seems slow even on standard LB without sucrose.
I sequenced the plasmids and everything seems normal.
Normally I have nice colonies by ~14-18 hrs, but these plasmids require more like 24-28 hrs for nice colonies.
It seems even more dramatic for liquid cultures: I have to incubate them for ~24 hrs.
Is that normal?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, this sounds normal.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Hello, I need to extract DNA and RNA from fish mature spermatozoa and unfertilised oocytes. I am also looking for a protocol to isolate mature spermatozoa from fish semen/testis and any advice on how to proceed with oocyte DNA/RNA extraction.
Relevant answer
Answer
We regularly genotype fish sperm. We release it, spin it down gently, and from there we treat it just like a piece of tissue with a typical SDS genomic DNA extraction buffer and a normal phenol:chloroform extraction. Let me know if you want details!
Oocytes obviously have far less DNA, I doubt the same method would work there.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
Normally, ecoli miniprep cultures are grown for around 12-18 hours at 37C.
However, due to my schedule, I won't be able to harvest the cultures for >24 hours. I think >24 hours is too long to grow ecoli cultures at 37C. I cannot freeze the cells and miniprep them later -- I will not be in lab at all for >24 hrs.
I want to grow them shaking at lower temperatures to slow their growth so I can harvest them later. However, I do not know what growth duration is appropriate at these temperatures.
How long should ecoli be grown at 30C and 25C to get something similar to 12-18 hrs at 37C?
Relevant answer
Answer
It is totally safe to grow E. coli @ 30°C and 25°C for plasmids preparation. The time to reach culture saturation (stationary phase) will mainly depend on the initial load in your samples and its volume. In rich media supplemented with glucose, you should be able to get enough bacteria in a 12 hrs ON culture, in regular E. coli lab strains.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
9 answers
Standard practice for plasmid minipreps is to grow ~5 mL ecoli cultures overnight (~16 hrs). This works well and I always get good plasmids.
However, a few times I wanted just *a little bit* of plasmid. So I only incubated for a few hours:
2 mL cultures for ~7-8 hrs at 37C.
The culture is a bit cloudy by this point and gives an okay yield of plasmid DNA.
However, this plasmid DNA is always seems very poor quality.
If I submit it for sanger sequencing, the results are a little ugly. As if I have a couple SNPs. A tiny bit of contamination. The plasmid is there, but it is dirty.
If I try to electroporate it into bacteria, it always "arcs." Like there is very high salt contamination.
I must re-transform it into ecoli and do a proper, 16 hour overnight culture to regain good plasmid. Then the sequencing is clean and perfect, and it electroporates with no arcing.
Why is this? Why do dilute, low-volume cultures always give such bad plasmid DNA? I would have thought "young" culture would be cleaner.
It is very frustrating because short miniprep cultures seemed so nice and convenient. But the prep is so dirty I think I am wasting my time.
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you using a column prep kit for this or just the base solutions?
I agree with your logic but, as with many things, logic can change based on understanding. When I read your statement, it made me think more deeply about the process of plasmid purification.
When you purify the plasmid from a young culture, the amount of DNA is limited in the sample (remember that the kits are designed for a certain number of cells to be processed). This means that the column in this case has a binding capacity that is nowhere near saturation, potentially allowing other salts to bind (think about why DNA binds them - the charge is critical) and be "purified" with your sample. This would explain the arcing that you see when you try and transform the plasmid.
I am not an expert on sequencing but have to believe that the salt contamination would also mess with the analysis.
My suggestion, if you want to experiment, would be to grow a larger volume for the shorter time (maybe several tubes or flasks) and test the preparation from one versus a pooled sample. If the pooled sample has less trouble electroporating, my suggestions are probably correct and you can send it out for sequencing as well.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
17 answers
As a technician I sometime want to compare different lab products. There are a lot of website and I am wondering which websites you use?
Relevant answer
Answer
As our respected colleagues stated their expert view on this topic, I think there are some unique websites that particularly developed to compare laboratory chemical products or pieces of equipment. I personally use the following links to do this whenever we're gonna purchase something for our lab.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I want to maximize the yield of DNA extraction from insects. I am already using different DNA isolation kits and I know that these are not specifically designed for insect samples. Does anyone have any tips to maximize the yield?
Relevant answer
Answer
Also, thorough sample grinding and being careful to not overload the column with sample (there is such a thing as TOO MUCH starting material) will help a lot. If your insects are normally fatty, then I'd use legs or similar to avoid gunking up the column with lipids.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
Hi,
I am working towards standardizing and performing ChIP-Seq experiments on Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings and roots. The mutant line I am using is tagged to YFP. I use about 1g of plant material. Do a formaldehyde fixation (10 minutes under vacuum and 10 minutes without vacuum). I shear the DNA using a Bioruptor Plus (from Diagenode) – 30 seconds shearing – 60 seconds stop and 30 cycles. I get fragment size between 300bp to 1500bp. I do an IP with GFP antibody from abcam and Protein G dyna beads from Invitrogen. I use 10-20 ug of DNA for IP. After IP I do DNA purification using Qiagen Min-elute DNA purification kit. I end up with very low concentration (2-10ng/ul in a 10 ul elution with elution buffer) and low A260/230 values (between 0.5-1.5).
I had two concerns regarding this
How can I increase the shearing efficiency (to get sheared DNA between 200bp-500bp)?
How can I increase the concentration of the DNA after IP?
Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mam,
Can you please share your working protocol for above experiment?
Regards.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hi,
I recently did an DNA extraction using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (protocol for insects). 260/280 values were okay, but 260/230 seemed a bit low (1.7). I still did an amplification and purified it with Promega Wizzard Gel and PCR purification kit. It seemed to have worked based on a bit of DNA I was able to run on a gel (I get the expected band). HOWEVER, when trying to load samples (with loading buffer) on a gel a lot of the sample did not sink into the pocket. Also 260/230 values are really low (1.20 - 1.60). What could have gone wrong? I don´t think it is ethanol, as I did do a dry spin and ethanol should not influence the 260/230 value... Could guanidin hydrochloride (from the Qiagen kit) make the sample float? What else could be the problem?
Thanks a lot!
Relevant answer
Answer
Charlotte Hopfe, as it is known that 260/230 value for all the 'pure' nucleic acid samples should be between 2.0 - 2.2, as you said the values are very low (1.20 - 1.60), means that the sample has a presence of contaminants which absorb at 230 nm.
Maybe the instrument which you used needs calibration.
(Or)
It can also be possible that the expected bands which you got might have some smears too which is because your sample has contamination due to which it is showing 260/230 values very low.
There are many more reasons which might have resulted in this problem which you are facing. Try doing this whole procedure using another kit.
Secondly, you said that 'when trying to load samples (with loading buffer) on a gel a lot of the sample did not sink into the pocket' so please check the kit.
If you have used a self-prepared loading buffer, please check the amount of glycerol as glycerol is responsible to help settle the sample in the well and follow this CSH protocol link to prepare loading buffer if you wish-http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/content/2006/1/pdb.rec8658.full?ijkey=df90f0b5bc3257b067b31a4943c953b1fd4b55db&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha&text_only=true
If you have used a kit that is kept for a long time so please vortex the loading buffer to properly mix the buffer components then retry, this problem of yours will be solved.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
We work a lot with an enda+/endonuclease+ strain of ecoli (stbl3), so for minipreps we just do the PB wash step and things work fine.
However, we sometimes have trouble with low quality DNA from maxipreps using the Qiagen kit.
I couldn't find this anywhere: Do Qiagen maxi kits tolerate endA+ ecoli strains? I read some other maxi kits have no trouble with endA+ strains, but I couldn't find anything about Qiagen's maxi kit.
I'd like to just switch to another ecoli strain, but my professor doesn't believe anything without extremely definitive evidence.
Relevant answer
Answer
You can try to add the PB wash step to the maxi-prep although it is not part of the standard protocol (just add it after passing the lysate's supernatant in the column) and that should probably solve the endA issues. As for other kit, I used the maxi prep from thermo which worked fine and is cheaper than the qiagen kits (the step to handle endA+ strain is integrated as part of the standard protocol).
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I need to fragment my DNA around 200-600bp to make ChIP-seq. I used a Sonics Vibra-Cell sonicator with cup horn (750W) 10s ON and 10s OFF (longer pulse allowed by this sonicator). The samples remained on ice during sonication. I can see a smear of 200bp to 1000bp fragments, but some of my DNA remains unsonicated. After sonication I did crosslink reversal DNA purification (including RNAse and Proteinase K treatments). I used about 200ng DNA in the agarose gel (1%).
Note: My samples are tomato and I using EpiQuik Plant ChIP Kit (Epigentek).
Relevant answer
Answer
Excellent answers so far, also important to troubleshoot the crosslinking itself. If you crosslink for too long or the glycine quenching isn't enough, it can be extra hard to sonicate.
I've always found this step super finicky to optimize, good luck!
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
I am performing a phenol/chloroform extraction of DNA. Unfortunately, I have to equilibrate the pH of the phenol by myself, and mix it with chloroform afterwards.
The way I did the pH equilibrium is by pouring some TE buffer (pH=8.0) into the phenol and shaking it rigorously for 2 minutes, and letting it equilibrate and phase separate. After that, I measured the pH of the phenol. it is 6.8 instead of being 8.0, which is desired.
Is this correct?
Relevant answer
Answer
The link below will help to prepare your phenol
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hello. I generated a few ChIP-seq libraries using NEBNext® ChIP-Seq Library Prep kit. I've never had any problems in the past and always had nice libraries.
Recently, I came across one issue. The libraries still look alright on a DNA HS Bioanalyzer chip but they are really low concentrated (0.1nM) based on qPCR using the KAPA Library Quantification.
We perform a PCR enrichment of adaptor ligated DNA and then we run it on a gel for gel size selection. I've attached the image of one of the library just before gel size selection. 
For troubleshooting purpose, I've also attached a Bioanalyzer profile of one of the library post-size selection and a gel I ran after qPCR quantification. The gel clearly shows how there is massive amount of bands around 120-130bp which corresponds to the adapters length. 
Do you have any clue about what the issue can be? 
Thanks
Federico
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Federico,
I have the same problem.
Have you figured out the issue? If not what quatification method you finally considered to load libraries for sequencing? It will be a great help.
Thanks
Mithun
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
Will this change the kinetic energy of the buffer or what?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi there,
If you want the current to be the only driving force then pH has to be uniform. pH variation involves charge variation of molecules bearing ionizable chemical functions and therefore their mobility when current is applied.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
I'm trialling a recently described salting out protocol to extract HMW DNA from insect tissue: https://www.biorxiv.org/node/716332.external-links.html.
The yield so far is good (~2-6 ug DNA / 30 mg tissue), and my study species is fairly large in any case, so that's not a huge concern. A quick check with a TBE gel seems to indicate that most of the material is >15 kb.
OD values are abysmal. 260/280 sits around 1.4-1.7, 260/230 is even worse from 0.4-0.8. The latter concerns me the more. There's no phenol or glycerol anywhere in my protocol, so that can't be it. I suspected it might be the salt, but I've seen no change after two precipitation/wash cycles with 1/10 vol. sodium acetate + 2.5 vol. ethanol, and resuspension in TE. All OD values measured with a Nanodrop One.
The downstream requirements are 260/230 = 2.0-2.2, 260/280 = 1.8-2.0.
Any recommendations on the source of the contamination? Stray organic debris? I'm grinding my tissue in liquid nitrogen, sometimes the sample (leg muscle) has exoskeleton attached which could introduce wayward polysaccharides.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
I agree with
Laurence Stuart Dawkins-Hall
.
You can try this protocol for DNA purfication after salting out:
Remember to use pH slightly alcaline in this extraction, do not use glycogen, i think you have a lot carbohydrates in your preparation.
Good luck,
Jacó
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
11 answers
I wonder if anyone has a positive experience for improving DNA quality following extraction with Chelex? This method is great for improving the yield, particularly for samples low in DNA or material, but it is also known for resulting in low quality DNA. The absorbance spectra are generally poor. Some methods employ proteinase treatment in concert with Chelex, but in our hands this does not improve the absorbance spectra in a remarkable way. Therefore, I would appreciate any suggestions on how to improve quality of DNA extracted with Chelex.
Relevant answer
Answer
Actually, yes:) Ampure XP beads seem to do a reasonably good job.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
Hello everyone!
I am trying to make a library of metagenomic DNA in the plasmid PBlueScript SK+. I fragmented metagenomic DNA by sonication and I confirmed the average size of the fragments is 3kb. I then repaired the DNA fragments with Klenow fragment (NewEngland #EP0054) so that the the ends are blunt. After that, I purified this reapired DNA. Previously, I digested the Plasmid PBScript with EcoRV that also leaves blunt ends. I tried to performed ligation in several Vector:Insert ratios (1:3, 1:1, 3:1...). None of the ratios gave a large number of clones but Ratio 3:1 exhibited the best results in terms of number of colonies and higher proportion of white/blue colonies, which is good .
I extracted plasmid from 15 white colonies of this ligation, I performed Restriction digestion with enzymes XhoI and NotI (that flank EcoRV at both sides in plasmid PBlueScript) so that I could see two bands in agarose gel (1 Plasmid backbone and 2 metagenomic insert). The problem is I obatined a unique band for most of the clones and, moreover, this single band does not match the size of the empty plasmid. Its smaller !!
To me, this result does not make sense. I thought there could be recombination events in the cell but I´m using DH5 alpha strain so it should not happen. Could it be due to an effect of ligation of so long fragments whit blue ends? Am I missing anything?
I have no experience with library construction so any help will be very helpful.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Jorge
Relevant answer
Answer
Following
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I wish to perform DNA drop dialysis and I wonder if I must use 0.1 um (or smaller) ester cellulose membrane or I can perform it in larger pores such as 0.22 or even on a piece of common tubing membrane with similar cut off?
Relevant answer
Answer
First, please be sure that the MWCO of the membrane is not more than that of the DNA. Also, here you have to take into consideration the structure of the DNA. If it is a linear DNA, it can easily pass through much smaller pores. If it is circular and supercoiled , the same can happen too. It does not necessarily work like it works for proteins in the case of DNA.
0.025- 0,05 μm is recommended for DNA dialysis
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
10 answers
I am trying to purify a 5.8kb plasmid from agarose gel. I have used 2 different kits and I remain on experiencing very low DNA yield after elution. I have tried to elute in 50uL, 30uL, and even did pooling (showed a better result). I begin with around 1ug of DNA but after purification I end up having 12ng/uL.
Is there any in-house protocol I can use?
Relevant answer
Answer
12ng/ul is perfectly fine and and more than enough for ligation. The elution can be enhanced by heating the buffer at 70C and incubating it for longer on the column. I usually digest 2ug if I need more DNA but if you calculate how much you are getting vs how much you adding you will see that the yield is reasonable (1000ng/30ul = 33ng/ul, 1000/50ul=20ng/ul if you are getting 12ng/ul then the efficiency is between 36% to 60% respectively depending on your elution volume) therefore I would not go looking for another kit because what your doing seems to be working fine.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
I regularly purify cell free DNA from patient plasma samples using Qiamp circulating nucleic acid kit, followed by analysis on BioAnalyzer which indicates genomic DNA contamination in few of the samples. I am looking for the protocols to purify cell free DNA from those samples by size selection. I have been thinking to use Ampure XP beads for the same. If anyone has used the same for similar purpose, it will be very helpful, if you can share your protocols with me.
Or you can suggests any other kit available for size selection of DNA below 200 bp, please let me know.
Relevant answer
Answer
could you please share the answerwith me?if you get the answer
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
15 answers
I digested 2.5 ug of plasmid and PCR product, and after digestion ran all of it on a 0.8% gel.  I excized my bands and proceeded to a gel purification using Thermo Scientific's Gel Extraction Kit.  After gel purification, I ended up with 8-20ng/ul of DNA by spec.  Where is all of my DNA going?  I was going to use these fragments for cloning.
Relevant answer
Answer
I've been having the same problem. In my case, the band I wanted to recover from the gel was a very little part of the total dna. It was a 6kb plasmid digested to extract a 500bp fragment and, if you put 3ug of total dna but your desired dna represents 10% of that dna, then you just have 300ng. Having said that, what I did was to increase the mass% of my desired product. I did a PCR with the plasmid as a template. The amplicon had my desired sequence in it. Now my desired product was 50% (1,5ug of 3ug total dna) of total dna mass and the recovery rate wasnt outstanding but I was able to carry on with my cloning. I suggest you to try this if that's the case for you.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
Is the DNA binding chemistry between DNA and column provided with the kit same in case of PCR purification kit and gel extraction kit?
Relevant answer
Verruchi Gupta One reason for this is in column based purification the recovery rate is not so high. You may lose upto 60% of product and the 40% you have you dilute it in high volume. Try to elute the final product in low volume to get concentrated DNA.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
We perform Sanger sequencing for varied range of PCR products. We usually employ ExoSAP for PCR product clean-up reaction. Due to unavoidable reasons we are looking for ExoSAP alternative.
Does ExoCIP from NEB perform equally good?
Technically what is the difference in the enzymatic activity of Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase? Which enzyme has optimum performance for PCR product clean-up activity?
Relevant answer
Answer
Katie A S Burnette Thanks for sharing your experience with us. I would better stick to ExoSAP-IT.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
5 answers
I am linearising plasmids for standards for qPCR. I purified my plasmids using Sigma miniprep and got the following results:
Plasmid 1 (P1) = 277.2ng/ul and 260/280 = 1.87
Plasmid 2 (P2) = 93.8ng/ul and 260/280 = 2.02
I have linearised them with Sph1 whose restriction site is not in the desired insert sequence. And followed the manufacturers protocol for the digestion.
Then I have run them on a gel, but no bands at all are visible. I am loading 200ng of plasmid onto the gel against 200ng of uncut plasmid to compare for linearisation. What could cause no bands?
After this I usually purify the linear plasmid. Using QIAquick purification kit from Qiagen. But most of my results end up <10ng/ul and very impure.
Any suggestions why?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have also faced the same problem but i could overcome it changing the buffer from the gel.
And If DNA purification results are so low, you can heat your elution buffer or water at 65 C for higher yield.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
13 answers
I need a huge concentration of restricted product. So can i just digest them in a 50 uL reaction with high volume of enzyme (say 5-7uL). This is just to run the digested product in a single gel and do a single shot gel elution.
Thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
You can always increase the concentration of your desired digested product using a speed-vac or putting the tubes in a warm heat block with the lid open. Out of curiosity, why does the concentration need to be so high?
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am amplifying a number of amplicons >1000bp from various plasmids and the PCR goes well.
However after a purification procedure (Qiagen's colomn method) a strange new band appears for all my amplicons, regardless of the template DNA.
I am very confused by what these could be and have done many controls to try to stop them from appearing (new buffers, new water, no vortexxing of solutions)
I am hoping that someone may have had a similar experience or perhaps someone may give some insight into what these may be and what it takes to stop them from appearing.
Relevant answer
Answer
Iagree with Kandasamy Ulaganathan answer for this question
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
After some consulting I decided to use a commercial pcr cleanup spin column kit to concentrate DNA from my CHIP for sequencing. The DNA was in elutate of sodium bicarbonate and 1% SDS. Instructions required me to dilute 6x in binding buffer, so this meant 9mL per sample column. When combined, precipitate came out, I assume this was the SDS. All of the protocols I've seen that use sodium biocarbonate and SDS to elute out dna jumped straight to purification using p/c or kits so I just moved on.
I ran the liquid through the column and near the end when I was washing them I noticed that the membrane of the tubes looked a bit crumpled and the wash buffer was dripping through it somewhat faster than in control columns and whitish precipitate was in the wash. I tried looking at the membrane at every angle but I didn't see any hole. After I eluted I noticed a tiny pellet of whitish stuff at the bottom of the tube. I'm not sure whether this was SDS or silica or what. I had the elutant tested through qubit and the samples showed very low to below threshold amounts of DNA. But this was CHIP pulldowns so this is not necessarily indicative that something is wrong. I was wondering what sort of steps I should take from here. Should just move on and see if I can create a library and do a PCR check or assume the columns were broken and try to reprocess the binding buffer waste which I kept? Multiple companies I contacted seemed to think that the spin columns should be able to withstand that volume although one of them (Thermofisher) apparently has columns with membranes that look thicker than the kit I was using.
Relevant answer
Answer
How much time, effort and money have you spent up to this point versus how much you will spend if you proceed with what you have?
If the CHiP part is easy enough to repeat, I would do that rather than proceeding with dubious material.
Also I would avoid bicarbonate, unless there is a very good reason that CHip will not work without it! Also 1% SDS seems to be a huge concentration!
I suspect that the membrane has been shrivelled up by the buffer components, but you might simply try exposing a purification tube to buffers alone to see what happens.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
10 answers
According to protocols I found from Nature (Heckman et al 2007) and Cold Springs Harbour (Forloni et al 2018), the PCR products must be purified using gel electrophoresis and then a QIAquick gel extraction kit or a similar product. According to a senior person in my lab, we usually use ethanol precipitation for PCR products because the gel method results in loss of a lot of the product. Is this a question of quality over quantity?
Also, is there a difference between the QIAquick gel extraction kit and the QIAquick PCR Purification kit, and which is better?
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest the answer of Suzana Radojkovic good for this question
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
I have amplified my samples using ITS1F and ITS4 primers. The gel has a faint band under the main band, the PCR settings are right as they work on other samples. The faint band is the same as the main band as I have sent them both for sequencing.
I did a PCR, then did a 1:10 dilution and did another PCR on the dilution using 1 ul of diluted product and 0.5 ul of diluted product in 50 ul reaction. My supervisor says I should mix both reactions together, then do something to purify the samples so I only get the main band to send off for sequencing. It doesn't involve a kit or running any more PCR, apparently it's really simple!
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Oliver. Cutting the gel with main band and doing the purfication with Qiagen QIAquick gel extraction kit worked for me too. But Oliver Manlik , do you have any experience about long length PCR products? I mean for those over 20kbp, I think Qiagen kit won't work.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
21 answers
I face many difficulties in gel purifying the restricted products
  1. A260/280 ratio is high sometimes
  2. Failure to recover DNA from gel ( completely)
  3. Loss of DNA - lesser yield
So is there any other way to ensure cleanup of the digested products without running them on gel?
Relevant answer
Answer
If it is a PCR product you could simply TA clone then digest out fragment from plasmid. Another alternative is to use a PCR clean-up kit without running on gel. Small DNA fragments are not co-purified.
You never quite get total recovery of DNA from DNA clean-up kits so you may just need to digest and run more product. If you still lose product then this might point towards other reasons: make sure you are using the kit correctly.
We used to carry out electroelution followed by ethanol/NaAc ppt etc but the use of kits changed all that and gave much better recovery.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
11 answers
I start with impure PCR products of >500ng/ul, 260/280=1, but peaks present at 260, and end up with peaks near 230, about 10ng/ul concentrations of 260/280=1.5 or so, which I assume is not DNA since there is no peak at 260. Is this due to contamination by guanidinium salts from the buffers? Or ethanol? What can I do? Gel electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel for 25 min at 70V showed DNA of the desired sizes, though not necessarily large amounts, and after purification, there was pretty much nothing.
Relevant answer
Answer
I mainly purify PCR products to either clone into vectors or Sanger sequence. For these applications, the contamination from the Qiagen gel extraction kit has never been a problem.
For purifying DNA in NGS workflows, we use Ampure magnetic beads, so you could try that if the contamination from the gel extraction kit inhibits your second PCR, but I suspect it won't be an issue.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I did DNA purification using nucleospin purification kit to my paraffin embedded tissue to detect EBV Xhol site by Xhol restriction enzyme but when i did restriction enzyme cutting and run them on gel (4%), there is no band for all my samples.
I need your suggestion in this case to get obvious band after purification?
Relevant answer
Thanks Abhijeet for you suggestion :)
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I used it many times, but today spin columns got clogged...we use the 96 well format of the kit and did extractions for the exact same organism before. any experience in un-blocking the spin columns?
Many thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
I know you asked this questions a long time ago but I share my own experience to help others facing the same problem. Yes, I have experienced clogged columns 3-4 times, three times after adding lysis buffer and once after wash. I have read before that some of Norgen columns have this problem due to the type of silica they have used in columns.However I think the lysis buffer must be preheated before use. I guess this step should not be skipped even if no precipitate is observed in the buffer.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hi,
i am using the inverse shifting PCR method for the diagnosis of inversion mutations in cases with haemophilia A. The method includes 3 steps:
1-digestion of genomic DNA then purification of the digested DNA to remove the BCLI enzyme or inactivate by heating at 80 C for 20 minutes.
2-ligation of the sticky ends then purification by phenol chloroform .
3-PCR for the ligated DNA circles
I used the protocol according to the following reference:
Rossetti LC, Radic CP, Larripa IB, De Brasi CD. Developing a new generation of tests for genotyping hemophilia-causative
rearrangements involving int22h and int1h hotspots in the factor VIII gene. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 830–6.
I understand that the quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA from whole blood is the most important part. we should start with the digestion of at least 1 or 2 microgram of genomic DNA.
I used the heating inactivation for the BCLI enzyme.
My result consistently includes a non specific band about 50 bp ( primer dimer?)
any help ?
Lane 1 50bp ladder,
lane 2 intron 22 inversion ( the band should be between 300-400bp) .
lane 3 intron 1 inversion (304 bp band )
Relevant answer
Answer
agree with@Paul Rutland
regards
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
2 answers
I have a modified DNA oligo that started giving me trouble with ligations. Upon running it on nanodrop, I saw a strange peak at 240-245 nm along with one at 280 nm. I don't know what this peak could be and knowing potential contaminants might help me clean the oligo up since it is precious and cannot be discarded or remade. The oligo was dissolved in nuclease free water and stored at -20.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have the same problem with you. I get the 240mm peak after DNA gel extraction. the DNA concentration is 20ng/ul.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I have collection of chicken blood samples. All of them were sampling under the same conditions, using EDTA as a anticoagulant (5 years ago, -20 C, max 2 times short defrosting). I am not able obtain DNA. In all lysis buffer the blood is immediately clotting. It creates something as light pink slime. Concentration is very low and purity very bad. I think, it doesn't make sense to continue when it coagulates during first step. Macherey nagel, Chemagen magnetic beads and also mixed buffer for phenol chloroform extraction and other (200 mM Tris­‐HCl, 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA 5% SDS) were used - result is the same: slime. Extraction was without troubles 2 years ago. I used from 20 to 50 ul of blood. I also tried other blood (porcine+EDTA, bovine+EDTA - stored under worse conditions) and it worked well. Has someone a piece of good advice?
Thanks
Relevant answer
The real reason that lies behind the tedious is the presence of the nucleated RBCs side by side with WBCs. this feature represent the main difference between the mammalian blood and its avian counterpart. to see more details see
best regards
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
20 answers
I am PCR amplifying a 2.8kb insert with the KasI and SacI restrictions sites added, w/ 6bp protector group on each side. I gel purify and then digest this insert as well as my vector by double restricting at 3 hours and 37C (these are NEB time-saver and 3 hours should be sufficient). I then gel purify and ligate the restricted products at 4C O/N. I transform ~5ul into 50uL, or ~10uL into 100uL competent cells using heat shock at exactly 42C. After plating, all my controls are successful (T4 ligase works on single restricted, double restricted vector without insert yields only 1 colony, my competent cells are competent and the transformation of my uncut vector yields 100s of colonies) and the only thing unsuccessful is my cloning plate. I run my ligation mixture and see my ligated product, but I also see a fair amount of insert and vector.
At this point, I've been experimenting for a while and want to give up. But what I conclude from my results is that my insert is not ligating, meaning it is possibly not fully double restricted.
How can I verify I have double restriction of my insert? What else could I be failing to pay attention to? I have been able to verify double restriction of my vector.
Is there something specific to keep close attention to when cloning relatively larger inserts to larger vectors?
Relevant answer
Answer
HELLO. Lot has already been said. Would like to add a point here. There are two important points; whether ligation of insert/vector has happened or not? And whether competent cells/strain are efficient enought for such activity?
Confirm your ligated product by using it as template in a PCR reaction using one primer from vector backbone and one from insert. Once you are done with it, focus transformation further. If transformation in e.coli does not work (after changing competent cells/or suitable strain), try to electroporate your ligated product in Agrobacterium cells ( LBA4404, EHA 105 etc). Once it gets stable in it, re-transform to e.coli cells. It works, we confirmed. Good luck
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
Hello researchers
all of us know, that we need a special protocol to extract DNA from frozen blood other than protocol which used to extract DNA from fresh blood .
the question is : .what are the specific changes in blood properties that obligate us to use a special protocol to extract its DNA.
best regard
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
7 answers
Hi!
Does anyone have experience with expired plastic ware in the lab, especially pipette tips??? I know sterility might become an issue, but one can always autoclave. But I also know plastic degrades over time, and plasticizers can leach to the surface of various types of plastic.
How long after expiry date would you trust your tips/tubes, for applications such as PCR or DNA purification? Months? Years?
Or to use for less finicky processes, like to load electrophoresis gels?
I work in a community lab and we don't have big budgets, so we have the possibility to buy expired disposables at a discount online...but it's only a real deal if we can actually use it! ;) We do not always know the conditions they were kept in either, and I know this also plays a role in plastic conservation. But let's assume lab condition for this question!
Thanks for your input!!
Cheers
Helene
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Helene, I have an experience with expired plastic ware in lab not only in DNA purification. If stored in dark and dry place with a room temperature about +20 it will ok during some years. I have en experience with Axygen and Sarstedt tips and tubes. Our lab make centralized, big and rare purchacing once a year or once in 2 years. Some times we saved a little bit lab ware during two years after date expired.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
4 answers
I am trying to extract DNA from some fungi species (mold) using Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit. Apparently in the manual (isolating genomic dna from plant tissue), addition of cell lysis solution is not included and I am trying to figure out if there would be significant effect if both nuclei lysis and cell lysis solution are added. Have anyone tried? How many μl and when (which step) did you add the cell lysis solution?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Aisyah Tan
l have exactly that kit for DNA extraction from fungus and it works perfect. I tried bouth buffers and only works the nuclei lisys, as you said you have the use the plant protocol with some modifications. First you have to have the pellet of your fungus, then add 600 Ul of Nuclei Lysis to the pellet ( in a 1.5 ml tube) its better if the buffer is colded on ice, then you have to use and macerate the fungus with the Nuclei Lysis Buffer like 1-2 minutes. Then vortex 3 seg and then add RNAase and continue the protocol as is indicated in the manual.
Good look!
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
10 answers
Promegas' Wizard® PCR Preps DNA Purification System; Purification Without a Vacuum Manifold (Using 3ml Luer-Lok® Syringes) is the kit i am using. I am purifying pcr products from a 1.5x TAE gel. I think the issue is during the washing part with Isopropanol and that it is not being washed off the column all the way and when I elute my DNA sample there is still isopropanol in my sample causing them to not stay into the wells of the gel and evaporate out. I have tried to spin the columns twice at 16,000xg for two minutes and let air dry for a minute before elution. Any advice or ideas? My next step is DNA sequencing (In some of my samples I have two bands per sample so I would like to purify from a gel)
Relevant answer
Answer
This happens sometimes ,unfortunately, it just because the ethanol or the isopropanol of the washing solution, the best thing to do is to spin down the tube with the lid open in the vacuum centrifuge until total evaporation of the elution solution and then elute it in MiliQ water or your elution buffer a second time. After that everything will be OK. Hope that my answer will be useful for you.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
7 answers
Hi every one, 
I used the GenepHlow Gel/PCR kit (Geneaid) for DNA gel extraction. But I got low yield of my product. I've tried the suggestion on the protocol but it doesn't work. Does any one have suggestion for improving the product yield for this kit?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
you can re-pass the sample from column to increase the yield. It will reduce the concentration but increase the yield.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
I have gram positive and negative bacterias for DNA purification, what low salt buffer I can use to wash cells and keep them intact
Relevant answer
Answer
Water is good, I found usefull 10% sucrose, and no EDTA - when sequencing in PacBio
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
1 answer
I am trying to optimize the fragment size of my input DNA to less than 1000 bp for a ChIP-qPCR experiment. However, all attempts so far has led to a long smear of DNA when run on an agarose gel (<200 to >10.000 bp) (Fig. 1).
I crosslink for 5 min followed by sonication for 1-30 min, RNase A treatment, reverse crosslinking with proteinase K (PK) ON at 65°C, and DNA purification (phenol-chloroform extraction + ethanol precipitation). All sonication time points give a similar long smear of DNA on an agarose gel (Fig. 1). However, by omitting the crosslinking step I obtain a gradient in fragment size during the sonication process as expected, indicating that the sonication works (Fig. 2). Although a longer sonication time is expected for crosslinked DNA, it seems unlikely that the DNA should be sonicated for longer than 30 min to observe any reduction in the fragment size.
So far I believe that the problem is the reverse crosslinking. However, I have tried different amounts and sources of PK, freshly dissolved PK, several additions of PK during the reverse crosslinking, different concentrations of SDS etc. without any luck. All the buffers contain a protease inhibitor cocktail; unfortunately with a proprietary concentration of each component. However, in theory the amount of PK should be high enough to overcome the effect of the inhibitors when compared to ChIP manuals by various companies utilizing a similar protocol.
Does anyone have a suggestion to what the problem might be and how to solve it?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
If your sample is 150 uL, you can use 6uL of 5M NaCl, and 2uL of 20mg/mL proteinase K. And then, you can incubate your sample at 65oC for 1.5 h.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone.
I started to work in a lab, where the focuses are molecular ecology and evolutive genomic. One of the projects is the genomic characterization of different samples of Pyura Chilensis, because we think that there are different ecotypes among the samples we're studying.
I'm an undergraduate student at Universidad Austral de Chile, currently studying Biochemistry, and my aim into this laboratory and project is to help the team with their biggest problem: obtaining high quality, pure and good concentrations of gDNA from the Pyura samples.
When we extract the DNA, the result is completely degradated DNA (we can tell it by doing the EPs). We've allways used GeneJET Genomic DNA purification Kit (by ThermoFisher), and when we use it on other samples (I mean other species) it works beautifully, so the kit isn't the problem.
We've always used tissue storaged, but the problem always appears even if the samples are one day old (and storaged) or even years old (We use Ethanol 95% for storing, and we wash the samples with Ultra Pure water before starting the procedure with the kit), but the storing method seems to be good for extracting gDNA in other species.
Then, my guess is that the problem is the Pyura itself (lol). So I have to figure out if either the extraction or the storage isn't appropiate for Pyura. I read that this Pyura thing has a lot of cupper within it, then we're going to use a new buffer for storing it (Salt Saturated DMSO, containing EDTA), and I'd like to perform another methods for the DNA purification (something more classic, like phenol/chloroform or something).
Finally , after the tedious contextualization, I would like to ask if any of you have ever worked with this organism (and if you have, what did you do and how did you managed it. I think that most of the time there's someone more experienced, and perheps someone already went through this) and what are your recommendations for solving my problem. If you know any technique for obtaining the DNA the way I described you (we need to sequence it), ways of storing (for example, would it be better if we extract the DNA and we store it instead of the tissues? Once we achieve the way of obtaining good DNA, of course; or if you think that the new buffer will work; or your recommendations when we do PCR because of the EDTA), or any advice, anything will help me and I'll be profoundly grateful (if I can achieve my aim, maybe my professor puts it into an article and my name appears on it, such a thing for an undergraduate hahaha).
Thanks in forehand for reading and helping (and excuse me for my bad english, it's not my mother language). Greetings.
PS: I added an image corresponding to the result of an electrophoresis with the product of the extraction. 1st lane is the standard (1kb), then next 9 lanes aren't my samples, and then those 3 lanes with long blurred thing instead of bands are the DNA I obtained. Last 3 lanes weren't loaded
Relevant answer
Answer
Honestly, those three bands don't look too bad. I think they look bad compared to the first several because so much more DNA was loaded.
That said, the degradation you are seeing could easily be caused by your pipette tip having too small an opening (can try cutting it with a ~30 degree angle) or possibly mixing the DNA during or after isolation too vigorously (with a vortex set greater than 3 or 4 or using hold instead of brief pulses).
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
8 answers
Hello researchers
Can somebody please , provide me the recipes to prepare buffers that used with silica spin column and the protocol to isolate the genomic DNA from blood .
best regards
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
6 answers
Hello,
I am starting with the study of vaginal microbiome. We have collected vaginal swabs, centrifugated them (6000 rpm, 10 min) and collected the pellets for the analysis. 
I was thinking about using PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification kit from invitrogen. Do you have any experience with this kind of sample and with this kit? Any suggestions?
I had also in mind the QIAamp DNA Microbiome kit from QIAGEN, but the cost is more than double. Any other kit do you recommend me to use?
Thank you very much,
Andrea
Relevant answer
Answer
I believe the human genome project recommends the PowerSoil kit from MoBio that is now part of Qiagen. Soil samples have a similar amount of organic material and inhibitors that need to be removed.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I am looking for method of amoeba DNA purification to use in optical mapping. OpGen regular kit is working fine - but not with amoeba
Relevant answer
Answer
Optical mapping need super long DNA- more then 100kb. We have experience of purification 1 000 kbp DNA. In some experiments I had 2.500kb, absolute record in my lab is 3.5000kb. But we need simplify protocol to use it not only for optical mapping - but also for MinIon sequencing
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
The samples we have are from leaves but dried completely at dark and in closed room. We have followed several extraction steps that included kit, kit with PVP and CTAB. However, the thing that we confront always is purification problems because the samples are not pure enough. Sequentially, this is our very first time to extract DNA from this plant. Any idea what to do? Thanks.
Relevant answer
Dear Yavuz,
I would like to know if you have some good news about the extraction. I am working on E. milii latex as a molluscicide component and this expertise could be important in the future.
Have you published or find some information about this approach?
Best regards,
Ronaldo
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
19 answers
I am trying to capture biotinylated DNA from a pool of biotinylated and non-biotinylated DNA using hydrophillic streptavidin magnetic beads (NEB). The beads are also binding non biotinylated DNA so I am not able to enrich the biotinylated DNA. Any suggestions on how to reduce the non-specificity or which other magnetic beads to use?
Relevant answer
Answer
Transfering beads to a fresh tube for the last wash should help reduce the non-specific problem too. There is often some non-specific DNA binding to tubes that might get carried over.
  • asked a question related to DNA Purification
Question
3 answers
I performed DNA extraction from 15 samples of heterophyes sp using the promega kit (Wizard Genomic DNA Purification A1125: tissu protocol without using protéinase K). Agarose gel electrophoresis did not reveal the presence of DNA.
Is it necessary to increase the number of parasites or use another extraction technique.
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Moez
I would not recommend using a DNA extraction kit for this. You may extract DNA from ethanol stored parasites (adults) using 200 μL of a 5%suspension of deionised water and ChelexW (BT Chelex® 100 Resin BIO-RAD, Hercules, USA) containing 0.1 mg/ml proteinase
K, followed by incubation at 56 °C for 3 h, boiling at 90 °C for
8min and centrifugation at 14,000 rpmfor 10 min. You can use the PuRe Taq™ Ready-to-go™ PCR beads GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK) for the following PCR reactions.