Courts - Science topic

There are unique situations in professional life of a docctor /hospital administrators, when they are not able to provide relief to patients due to limitation of law and/or complexity of law, they are referrieng or advising patient party to approach the Court for appropriate relief.

Can anyone assist me? How to write The sample technically doesn't have any DNA in it.

Recently, burned bones for species identification have been delivered to us. We tried every method we could think of to get the DNA out, but it was ineffective. Therefore, we decided to report DNA not found in the sample.

How effectively can you inform the court that the sample lacks DNA?

The age old question about theory - the I have put forward a proposition below (which I dont neccessarily agree with) - hope it generates a lively discussion and I am interested to hear from you on this facinating topic ;)

Dr Anna Kawalek

When we talk about theory in academia, any scholarly body has two main (interconnected) theoretical strands. To understand the core academic positions of any legal (or non-legal) school is to consider both aspects. The first is methodology (comprising primarily of ontological and epistemological assumptions about the law, latterly engaging relevant methods of discovering the law). This is general research philosophy applied more precisely to the subject of law (we might discuss the same paradigms in different fields, for instance, maths, physics, or sociology). This branch considers the mechanics behind making knowledge claims pertaining to whatlaw is (ontology), how we can know law (epistemology), and how these theoretical understandings create channels into relevant methods to construct knowledge. For further information, Stobbs provides an accessible overview of the academic terminology ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods.[1]His articulation is particularly useful because it demonstrates the link between these key pillars of knowledge acquisition (ontology, epistemology, methods), each layer creating a building block for the next, and together creating rigorous methodology.[2]

The second strand concerns substantive, prescriptive, or content-drive claims about the law or what the law ought to do.[3] The focus is subject matter, content, and causal links that discusses the law, practice, and the courts. Generating substantive knowledge claims rest on a (implicitly or explicitly acknowledged) series of complementary methodological assumptions from the first strand. This makes both strands interconnected. For example, commitment to a subjectivist ontology and sociological epistemology would project a substantive theory of psycho-social variety; it is unlikely (and potentially impossible) for this type of methodology to generate a substantive claim of a natural science genre. In the alternative, an objectivist ontology and empiricist epistemology may generate substantive theory of biomedical variety. This means that every juncture of a methodological process opens up a prism of potential substantive claims, whilst closing off others. Usually, when comparing any two schools, the bigger the adjustment to methodological assumptions (what reality is and how we know it), the greater the difference in substantive claim (seeking to explain and discuss these realities). Taken together, if a methodological underpinning offers a (limited) spectrum of substantive claims, this means that literature ascribing to a similar series of methodological assumptions are likely to provoke similar genres of substantive theory. Alternatively, literature ascribing to different methodologies but examining the same phenomenon will project opposing substantive theories about that given phenomenon because they make very different theoretical commitments about the world.

In law, this point is exemplified by legal realism and formalism, two schools that are typically understood as scholarly opponents. Their ontological and epistemological beliefs mean that the realists and the formalists each respectively construct knowledge of the law and legal processes in a very different way to one-another, mobilising a very different sets of methodological benchmarks. However, at the same time, they examine similar substantive content – namely, the courts, advocacy, and juristic methods,[4] and how political standards influence adjudication.[5] The formalist position takes a normatively-infused political angle; it considers judicial decisions and how judges do and ought to decide cases, seeking to persuade practitioners to justify preferences to objective standards.[6] However, the realists reject ought questions and look at social facts and effects as they manifest in reality.[7] At risk of venturing too far into the terrains of their respective substantive claims, the key point is that they examine similar phenomena using very different methodologies. As a result, despite examining the same “thing”, they derive substantive conclusions on opposite ends of the spectrum. This serves to highlight the significance of methodological assumptions for generating substantive claims.

Are there in fact two stands when we generate theory? Discuss.

[1] Nigel Stobbs, ‘therapeutic jurisprudence as theoretical and applied research’ (chapter 3) in Stobbs, et al. [n 14] [48].

[2] Ibid.

[3] Edward L. Rubin, The Concept of Law and the New Public Law Scholarship, 89 Mich. L. Rev. 792 (1991) Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol89/iss4/3

[4] Karl N Llewellyn, ‘The Normative, the Legal, and the Law-Jobs: The Problem of Juristic Method.’ The Yale Law Journal, vol. 49, no. 8, 1940, pp. 1355–400. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/792545. Accessed 29 Jun. 2022.

[5] Jeremy Telman, ‘International legal positivism and legal realism’, in Jörg Kammerhofer & Jean D'Aspremont (Eds.) International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (pp. 241-263) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014). doi:10.1017/CBO9781139094245.012

[6] Ibid; Michael Freeman, and Dennis Lloyd of Hampstead. 2001. Lloyd's introduction to jurisprudence (chapter 9). (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001).

[7] Oliver Jütersonke, ‘Realist Approaches to International Law’ in Anne Orford and Florian Hoffmann The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016) DOI: 10.1093/law/9780198701958.003.0017

It's been couple of days for me to learn this new topic for my research study. I noticed there's a large difference when I study at my lab and food court. In the lab, my labmates will be doing their own research and most of the time, the environment is silent and cold. So, I'm easily get sleepy and hard to focus. However in food court or Cafe, there'll be a lot of people comes in group. Some with their families and some with their colleagues. They form various topic of discussions and making the environment noisier. But this environment is very ideal for me to study and focus on my research topic. I'm very curious on this situation because some of my colleagues prefer a silent and cold place to focus on their study while people like me, we like noisier and ambient place. So my questions is what make us different? Is it due to our personality or the function of our brain or how we live our lives? I know this kind of weird question but if you have reference or opinions, kindly share it here. Thank you!

As in the title. Any help is welcome. Also, recommend open datasets.

The Constitutional Court can perform its duty only when supported by the people's trust , and this trust arises from communication with them ". What do you think ??

Based on these authors

1) Why Nations Fail, The Narrow Corridor [Acemoglu and Robinson] 2) Poor Economics [Duflo and Banerjee]

3) Tyranny of Experts [Easterly]

4) Pedagogy of the Oppressed [Paulo Freire]

I might add that there appears to be no mechanism for them to protest/resist policies that directly effect them. No court system to use like some Indigenous people do in the US and Canada.

Also they were terribly impacted by ethnic cleansing like other minorities when Po Pot ruled so trauma still effects them.

Trying to help someone with their dissertation in Political Science

Is it possible that Kleptomania can co-occurs with Personality disorder ?

From some research I found that Kleptomania can occurs with Personality disorder especially in cluster B (Borderline and Anti social personality disorder) but I’m not sure about that .. is it possible or not? Or they can occurs in other group (cluster A or C) ?

And how court judge in this case in England or USA ? Is it possible that court will reduce penalty ?

If you have any text or research paper , Please recommend me

Thank you in advance for your help in this matter

Regards,

Punthita

In the legal field of custody pending deportation (Abschiebungshaft) in the Federal Republic of Germany, errors happen more frequently in the lower instance, the district court. Above all, it is procedural errors that lead to decisions later being found to be unlawful, for example, a lawyer who can be seen from the files is not contacted or there is insufficient language mediation. In terms of reasons for this, the lack of time and the density of court proceedings are often put forward first, leading to a lower qualitative examination. In the same way, legal ignorance can sometimes be observed in the legal field of custody pending deportation.

I am interested in whether there are other areas of law in which similar errors can be identified at the lowest level? In other words, procedural errors that happen again and again.

Does anyone know how I am able to get online access to malingering assessments, especially the inventory of legal knowledge or The M-FAST? Thank you

Good evening everyone,

I have been selected to pursue a research project on U.S. Drug courts by the Ronald McNair Undergraduate Scholar Program. Does anyone have any experience, or know anyone who has?

US President Donald Trump said the international terrorist organization ISIS was founded by former US President Obama. Why isn't the account being asked in the US, which is claimed to be famous for its democracy? Why isn't the court of such an important and serious claim?

I have run linear regression analysis to find the relationships of court culture, court performance, court resources and socio-demographic variables. All variables are measured using scales developed by me. If someone asks why you have not SEM?

What should be reply of this question?

I am now working with the project of "Evaluate the Impact of the Implementation of GDPR on the Role of the European Court". Before conceptulizing it for the discussion, I need to collect some data and have some ideas of the discussion for it. Do you have any articles or reasearches recommended about this topic?

Touch DNA may be useful in Sexual offences but I need its protocol and some examples so that it may be used in Indian context.

I need to learn and understand the " Brain Fingerprinting Technology". Please suggest to me some good sources, either books or research articles for understanding the brain fingerprint technology especially in forensic science.

Righteousness and Justice are common buzzwords often used interchangeably that we use in the present data-driven world and without knowing what exactly it mean. The current world has Courts of Justice as part of the legal system. As many or most use the said terms inappropriately and in a meaningless way, and being even the most bright scholars and pundits have only vague ideas about it, let us have a discussion about "What is Righteousness? and how it differ from Justice?", to bring out the real meaning of "Righteousness" and to bring about a righteous society.

What is your opinion regarding these issues?

Some legal philosophical approaches to these questions can be found in my paper "Extreme Wrong Committed by National and Supranational Inactivity: Analyzing the Mediterranean Migrant Crisis and Climate Change from a Legal Philosophical Perspective", Göttingen 2021.

Churches of the restoration faith are some of the complex churches because they do not have a specific doctrinal tradition like Catholicism, Methodism, Presbyterianism etc...they emphasise restoring the church to its pristine forms. It however has borrowed from the Calvinistic traditions and has embedded traditions in its teachings. These traditions have been overcrowded by different practices - the churches are like a court with multiple centres. The centre of the court can no longer be identified. Churches now clamor for unlearning their practices to relearn the traditions. Therefore the question is, How best can the churches of the Restoration faith unlearn their practices to relearn their faith traditions?

How possible is it for one challenge implementation of a bill in parliament before it becomes law? Can the same be taken to court. All views from different jurisdictions are welcome.

As much as I understand, the case will be decided by the jury, which consists of people who are not experts either in law or in medicine. Why is this good?

Would you be happy if you were tried by people who know neither the law nor the mater which the trial is about?

Why do law school exist, if a jury of non-experts can decide in the most difficult cases?

The UK has been having out of court, and therefore, accessible justice towards insolvency. There are many reasons that people end up as individuals, having to take this drastic action. Examples could include death in the family, serious illness, job losses and others. We wish to establish what are the main causes identified to date in their diversity?

Answers will be appreciated from both personal experience and from witnessing those from others.

This issue involves what court has jurisdiction to hear the case, which involves an English person and an America. The American has been served a claim notice while on a visit to England. The American however, wants to question the Jurisdiction of the high court in London and want to know what European rules apply on allocation of Jurisdiction and their relevance since she is an American.

If anyone is willing to assist, I can give the summary of the case details, so that it case be understandable from your perspective.

One Mr wes was sued for affray in the state high court because of an argument between Mr Wes and Laurel the claimant.the agument led to Wes punching Laurel's front tooth,as a result of their shouts and screaming it attracted the neighbors.

The rullings of the court discharged and acquit wes.

Hello all,

I am currently working on my final year module (T452) with the OU.

I am investigating the reliability of safety factors and have already found a lot of literature which highlights many uncertainties and reliability behind safety factors.

Something I think will add value to my report would be the possibility that safety factor, standards or design codes being challenged in court after an engineering failure.

Engineering contracts are generally issued on the basis that standards or design codes are followed, and proof that a contractor has applied these are generally accepted as evidence that they complied in the event of court case.

However, I wonder if anybody can direct me towards any sources where design codes, standards or safety factors have been challenged ?

I have been searching for days now with no luck!

Nepal’s constitution does not state clearly about political affiliation or membership as criteria for ineligibility for the position of the judge. Can they remain members of a political party? Or can a person who served as a parliamentarian be appointed in the position of judge? How can possible conflict of interest be avoided?

Although the 23 February decision of the Supreme Court on house dissolution set a precedent and firmly established the separation of powers between three branches of the state and established constitutional supremacy, the time taken by the Supreme Court to determine the bench and the prolonged hearings of the case raised serious doubts on judicial fairness. All eyes were on the Supreme Court regarding whether the Court would be able to protect constitutionalism and maintain its integrity - keeping itself away from the political influence.

Public perceive that the judges are and can be influenced politically. Nepal's judicial history has proved that the political influence is the most common threat. Historical evidence shows that during the royal regime, it was controlled by the King and the royal palace and after the establishment of democracy by the political forces – judges are appointed based on political affiliation and political bhagbanda (sharing) and family ties. The provisions of the Interim Constitution, 2007 and the current Constitution, 2015 governing the selection, appointment and removal of judges reflects absolute political control over the judicial branch. Many of them owed their preferment to their party connections and disincline to sever against them undermining judicial integrity and independence.

Once extreme democratic outcomes like Trumpism come to exist they must behave autocratically as their model structure, including the political and legal loyalties structures that they needed to persist, are the opposite as those of the normal liberal democracy model inside which extreme democratic outcomes came to exist.

Then when time for re-elections comes for extreme democratic outcomes, there is the possibility of winning or losing if playing the normal liberal democracy way, but there is the need to win at all cost if playing the extreme liberal democracy way.

Which leads to the question, what is the sufficient condition for extreme democratic outcomes like Trumpism to win re-elections or persist in power at all cost? Can the absence of this condition sufficient condition explains why Trumpism failed to persist in 2020?

Any ideas? Please share your own ideas in order to exchange ideas.

Keep in mind; this is an academic question, not a political question as I am a scientist, not a politician.

What is meant by bridge or phased drain? What are the conditions for its establishment and what are the services it provides? And how does its establishment differ from the regulations for establishing banks? Is its establishment subject to the Commercial Companies Law? Why? And to any specialized court to consider it?

In addition to the severe implications for public health, COVID-19 has imposed significant challenge on the access to justice. Restricted access to the judicial system has increased vulnerabilities to already vulnerable groups and communities. This has raised a serious concern on ensuring speedy access to justice.

Some experts have suggested to accelerate digitalisation in the administration of justice and have put forward ideas of ‘smart courts’. This means e-mediation, e-arbitration and online courts procedures. It might be possible in some jurisdictions but in many jurisdictions courts and judicial systems are often obstructed by series of institutional challenges. How can they create and manage ‘smart court’?

would be very grateful if some recommendations are made on the relevant cases or articles to read to help. thank you.

As all of you may know, we can take the experience of Trumpism(November 2016-January 2021) in the USA to explore questions such as when a democratic contest can lead to partial and permanent authoritarianism. The failure of the USEXIT/Trumpism to persist by losing reelection means that we just witness temporary authoritarianism, but it could have been worse as one more step was needed to move towards permanent authoritarianism in the USA and the lost of the most relevant normal democratic system in the world. Which raises the question, When can permanent authoritarianism take hold under majority rule liberal democracies?. Any ideas about what the missing step was to transition from temporary to permanent authoritarianism in the USA in 2020. Feel free to share your ideas.

Hello everybody

I am working on a thesis on court interpreting and thinking about a questionnaire to explore the perceptions of students at universities regarding the knowledge and skills a court interpreter should have. The hypothesis is that students know little if at all about the knowledge and skills that an interpreter should demonstrate in court settings.

The idea is first to define through interviews with lawyers and interpreters then determine knowledge and skills. In light of the interviews, I will try to see how much of these students at the university feel they have learnt or feel are important for their future career in court settings.

The problem is that I have never studied a course in quantitative/qualitative questionnaire development and feel lost. How do I develop the questionnaire? How do I validate it? These are the two questions that bother me a lot.

If you can help me with a clear reference or a validated questionnaire, I would be very grateful.

Thank you!

The Hulu production ‘Harlots’ highlights how during the 18th Century aristocrats would often disregard the law (which they implemented and had enforced on their subjects) in their lust for power by abducting young maids and then would have their way with them such that the rape culminated in the death of the women all for some seconds of orgasmic pleasure. “This is fiction!!!”, you say. If you consider what has been happening at the House of Windsor over the last century you might be more credulous. Here we have a case of a young Princess Diana deceived into marriage so that the Royals could continue their bloodline. The princess, often confined to her bed-chamber (once she gave birth to the children), eventually had a mental breakdown that led to her death all while her prince charming committed repeated infidelity. In a like manner, we have another Royal, Prince Andrew, the much beloved son of Queen Elizabeth, caught with has ‘pants-down’ fraternizing with pubescent girls in the company of the late Jeffry Epstein who as an insurance policy against anyone who planned to report on his illicit operations on his Island of Pedophilia, video-taped all the rich and famous who indulged in those activities with him. What all these stores have in common are having unlimited funds to support an unchecked lifestyle.

Now to Donald Trump. If you look at the history of this man he employed his vast sums of money (presently estimated to be around 2.4 billion dollars by Bloomberg News) to commission a bevy of lawyers to succeed at victimizing individuals who cannot come up with a comparable sum of money to succeed in court. He picks his victims strategically. When he was accused of raping an underaged girl with Jeffry Epstein in the state of New York in 1994, the girl—later as an adult and apparently of modest means—never put forth an effective prosecution in 2016 (Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA). In a like manner when Trump refused to pay individuals for the construction of Trump Tower in New York or for the running of his businesses most did not have the means to fight him in court (US Today June 9, 2016). Trump has a long history of using the American court system to his advantage knowing that by simply pushing more money a rich person often overcomes the defenses of a poor person. Even when he loses in court, as he did for running a fake ‘Trump University’, he has the mean to manipulate the media such that his followers concluded that he is indeed a master deal maker as underscored in ‘The Art of the Deal’ and promoted in the TV series ‘The Apprentice’ which propelled him to the presidency.

The methods used by Donald Trump to corrupt the results of the 2020 election is much in keeping with the forgoing precedent: use the court system even when the chips are down since in the end—even if defeated—one will have the opportunity to contaminate the minds of the entourage which now number in the tens of millions and which includes prominent Congressmen, that the 2020 election was stolen, a distortion of fact that will then be used to pave the way to the next deception which always seems to replenish his bank account. So far, Trump’s followers have contributed over 170 million dollars to his ‘election fraud’ scam. The only way to end this contemptible behavior is to put him away much like what has been done with Al Capone, Anthony Salerno, Ivan Boesky, El Chapo, and if he had not taken his own life, Trump’s partner in crime Jeffry Epstein.

This is a question to historians of American slavery. I thought a slave owner could give manumission for his slaves. But some sources say a slave could be freed only under certain conditions like saving a life and only by decision of a court.

I am specifically looking for cases in Russian, Chinese, Turkey and South African courts which deals with Venezuelan recognition. Since the government of these countries recognize Mr. Maduro and not Mr. Guaido, I am trying to find does the courts in these country follow the one voice doctrine and accept that the courts should follow the recognition provided by their governments.

I am examining problem-solving court (PSC) effectiveness relative to community-level crime and arrest rates. Though I know the UCR dataset works best by agency (ORI), it would be impossible to merge this with my PSC data and have it make sense. These types of courts invariably cover counties in their jurisdictions. Knowing the limitations of county-level imputation of the UCR data, I am limiting my analysis to after 1994 and would like to use the Coverage Indicator variables as a validity measure.

Does anybody have a recommendation for where to set the cutoff? I have been searching the literature that uses UCR data and cannot find a standard.

Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

I have three groups:

1. Population of people in a treatment court

2. Matched sample from traditional court

3. Known people in traditional court with condition being treated in treatment court

I'm thinking that I would use a repeated measures ANOVA, but wouldn't recidivism (Y/N) be the dependent variable, which isn't continuous?

I'd love advice or suggestions. Thanks!

I am doing a research on the dispute resolution systems under the Belt and Road Initiative (specialized courts, ordinary courts, arbitration and other ADR) in several jurisdictions.

I am looking for the relevant provisions and for the case law (if any).

Thank you all in advance for helping me.

Bonjour , je cherche les enseignants ou les responsables de l' (ENSAS) École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Strasbourg  , je suis doctorante en architecture , de l'université algérienne , j'ai bénéficié , il y a deux ans , d'un stage scientifique de courte durée (10 jours) , et depuis 2017 je n'arrive toujours pas à le consommer car je n'ai pas pu avoir une lettre d'accueil , j'ai contacté presque toutes les écoles d'architecture en France , et ils m'ont pas répondu , cette fois ci , j'ai décidé de contacter l'école de Strasbourg , et je souhaite que j'aurai une réponse favorable ,,,,, je serai reconnaissante si je reçois un msg de votre part ......

Hello All,

I'm interested in knowing if there are any programs for practicing law during college study such as a legal clinic and training in the courts? also, are these programs part of the college curriculum and mandatory for all?

I am trying to research Muller, who was the chaplain of Frederick I's army in 18th century. He was the counselor who ministered to Frederick the great and Lt Katte in prison (1730) before Katte's execution. None of the resources I can find reveal Muller's first name, although he is mentioned in many history books and memoirs only by his last name. I noted many Mullers in a religious context before and after the 18th century. I would like to identify this particular Muller for a project in the works. Could you help with the first name? I would greatly appreciate your help. Thank you

Dr Nancymarie Phillips Ohio <nancymphillips@aol.com>

The challenges include: the leadership element of the crime that makes prosecution hard and the opt-in and opt-out clause that allows state parties to withdraw from the courts jurisdiction e.t.c?

I want get help to turn my title and intent into a hypothesis for a research proposal. The following are noted challenges:

· Depression in African American men, who have been impacted by the mandates & ramifications of the child support court system, such as revoked driver’s license, professional license, interest rates continue even when incarcerated, loss of job, under employed, large fees to pay child support online, subjected to annual maintenance fees----many of the aforementioned deficits has inspire drugs, alcohol, increased aggression, and suicide/homicide

· Hopelessness

· Navigating the court system to offer incentive for men who participates in counseling

· Navigating resources

I am trying to detect and track tennis ball during a Padel game. I have only one camera ( 30-50 fps) recording video from one end of the court. The ball is small and moving fast. I am using yolo v3 to detect the ball but it fails to detect it most of the time. Is there any approach that can be used in this kind of situation?

While writing a paper about Hans Holbein the younger's Lais from Corinth, I noticed that Vera Mamerow, who wrote extensively about this theme in 2006, made a comparison between italian courtesan portraits and german prints and paintings, which typically portraits a prostitute (NOT a courtesan). My questions are:

Whether the Handwriting Recognition Software admissible in the court of law in respect of report filing by Forensic Document Examiners?

How much accuracy rate of this software is admissible by a court of law?

However, I really don't know which one to choose as a dependent variable in order to measure : students' level of attitude (1) or (2) level of performance (that would be a dependent variable for behavior). I think about the first one, since it seems more measurable than the second one. Also, as an indicator I would like to use the number of food packages, bottles, and papers thrown away by students into the volleyball court and their preference of transport (private cars or public transportation). By asking Likert scale questions about these indicators, I would like to get ordinal data about students' level of eco-friendly performance or level of attitude towards environment. Research subject is the students of our university.

What do you think about the application of artificial intelligence in the courts to make rational judgments?

I am looking for studies on the prevalence of students with disabilities being excluded from field trips. I have found a few court case rulings but no studies looking into how often it happens and why. Thanks!

Recently, tik tok a video sharing social media app was banned by the Supreme court of India given the reason that it promotes pornography among children. Do you feel that banning tik tok was the right decision?

Many cases are coming to Hon'ble Supreme Court and various High Courts in India with prayer for MTP beyond 20 weeks of Gestation on ground of Congenital Anomaly of fetus detected late due to limitation of technology.

On many occasions Court allowed MTP beyond 20 weeks. This painful situation to approach the Court for poor persons not having knowledge and money for the same leading to violation of Right to life /Health under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Proposed Amendment in MTP to raise the Limit to 24 weeks is pending in drafted Bill form.

There is need for strong political will to bring amendment to reality.

Many environmental courts and tribunals have been created in different parts of the world to mitigate environmental injustices. Is this a positive development or will the creation of environmental courts not radically reduce environmental injustices?

Are you going to restrict the study to, say, family court? Juvenile offenders? Repeat offenders?

You refered to the article 11 of the Japanese constitution in your recent paper (The Anthropocene concept as a wake-up call for reforming democracy) . This article 11, however, still remains nothing more than a sheer ideal or cliche. We japanese have neither any Constitutional Court nor OFG. The Supreme Court is institutionally provided with the right to overrulle any law it judges as unconstitutional; But, it has rarely, if ever, excercised this right. A great majority of the Japanese voters are most nlikely, so seems to me, to acccept the concept of Future Branch powerful enough to check and contain the popular/parliamentary sovereignty. I would much appreaciate if you let me know how it is possible to 'launder' people's political preferences

Yukio Adachi

Without wishing death or misadventure upon any sitting U.S. Supreme Court judge, suppose that President Trump at 11 a.m. tomorrow were to have occasion to make another appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. Could the President - "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate", to be sure - appoint an artificial intelligence system to that office? The "Appointments Clause" in the Constitution (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court". There does not appear to be any requirement that the appointee be a human being.

Without wishing death or misadventure upon any sitting U.S. Supreme Court judge, suppose that President Trump at 11 a.m. tomorrow were to have occasion to make another appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. Could the President - "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate", to be sure - appoint an artificial intelligence system to that office?

The "Appointments Clause" in the Constitution (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court". There does not appear to be any requirement that the appointee be a human being.

I would like to obtain the full text of FOSTERING CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE COURTS by Weller, Martin and Lederach, March 2005Family Court Review 39(2):185 - 202

DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00603.x

Court challenges to dress codes have centered on the abridgment of student free speech rights. However, a new challenge has surfaced that is not necessarily rooted in free speech rights. Are dress codes discriminating against female students by singling them out for additional scrutiny based on "gendered"expression? An exploratory study of 25 New Hampshire school district policies found that there were 51 provisions specific to female student attire and 7 male specific provisions. The gendered restrictions are in large part based on the argument that if female students wear these clothes that the boys will be distracted from their studies.

In the modern world, dangerous and inhumane things happen on a daily basis. Various states, politicians, statesmen, public figures violate the norms of civilized behavior, they do not respect human rights and violate international law.

Would it be good for RG members through a debate to establish a sort of "Russell's court", (Tribunal), to evaluate and criticize the bad and intolerable actions of important subjects in the modern world.

Real-match video data for Tennis Shot Recognition like THETIS [http://thetis.image.ece.ntua.gr/ ] except that is in front of a basketball court, and too focused on the player.

In 1656, Dutch artist Rembrandt van Rijn transferred his home to his son Titus (age 14) by order of the Weeskamer (Orphan's Court) one week prior to his insolvency proceeding filing. (The Weeskamer was not advised of this upcoming insolvency event). According to the literature, although he paid the principal amount owing on his promissory note, significant interest (about f 3,000) remained unpaid. How did Rembrandt obtain the release of the lien/ title from the note holder for the transfer to be completed? Were there "liens" attaching to real property in existence in the Dutch Republic in that era?

My question is based on the regulation of Indonesia general election supervisory body called Bawaslu RI (Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia) No. 8/2018 on settlement of administrative violations of general election, Article 64. Which stipulate if there is any party who is not satisfied with the verdict made out by the first stage court conduct by the provincial/district Bawaslu (only applied to the party who is act as the reporter party or the reported party in the case). could ask a favour to the Bawaslu RI as the appeal court to correct the verdict made out by the Provincial/Regency Bawaslu as the first stage court. But, in the process of correction of the verdict by the Indonesian Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu RI). they are not obliged to present the parties which involved in this case, they will only strengthen the verdict made by the provincial or district Bawaslu or correct the verdict by examining the verdict documents and evidence presented in the first stage court. without presenting the parties involved in the case (in other words, they did not apply the audi of alteram et partem principle).

Last week, about 30 members of the self-described "Decent People" movement disrupted performance of a play called "Our Violence and Your Violence" in the theatre in the Czech Republic.

They consider that play as blasphemous and highly unethical as it ridicules the Catholic Church and the final scene even shows Jesus Christ proceeding to enact the rape of a Muslim woman.

I am going to asses the limits of the freedom of expression in this case. Do you know any useful fresh judgement of the European Court of Human Rights or your national courts that have decided similar case and address the issue of the limits of the freedom of expression, right to religious or right to free cultural performance?

You can read here about the case:

Respected and dear Researchers, please help me to find court cases of good faith of contract of Islamic countries.... like arbitration where the judge applied during the decision good faith of Islamic contract law..like promissory estoppel, abuse of right, rule of situation changing..

As a group of eraly childhood psychotherapists in Switzerland, we made the experience that children's rights to have contact to their fathers are used by courts to implement visiting settings also für sexually abused infants and toddlers with their abusing fathers.

Yesterday the Brazilian courts upheld the corruption charges against Lula the front runner for the looming elections:

Also recently the Spanish courts upheld the imprisonment of the victorious Catalan nationalist leaders:

Questions:

Are the courts independent?

Are the charges against them 'politically motivated'?

Do we see a trend emerging here around politics and democracy?

Some aspects of morality are indeed legislated. So how do you determine which aspects are legislatable and which are not?

Im looking to base my research on OSINT and building a suspect profile. Any leads about current research or researchers would help.

Thanks

Dear sirs: Condensate towers to treat the outcome of natural gas drills from the sea - are planned to be build near the shore- in Israel. There is a civil concern - is it dangerous ? health problems ?

We need an expert on this matter- to present a professional resume to the supreme court - that will deal about this soon. If you are such a expert - or know one - please contact me

Thanks Yosi Scolnik

Almost everyone experience stress at the workplace. The stress could be of many different types on account of many causes. However stress imparted by top management to senior executives at work place exceeding its normal limit may lead to serious implications.

There should therefore be some legal frame work to address such issues in the Court of Law.

Do you have such law in your region/nation? Can you briefly state important provisions thereof ?

This will be helpful to one of my students conducting research on stress management for senior corporate executives and its legal framework.

Thanks in advance

Given the recent interest in creating swarms of robotic flies that carry explosives and contain face recognition circuitry (as described in Bot Flies, The Economist, Dec 16, 2017) will a time come when the enablers of such killing machines will be made to account? We all know that machines will never—and I emphasize never—be able to make decisions without the assistance of humans so expect arguments such as “the machine did it” to fail in a court law. Can you imagine a world where people like Robert Oppenheimer (the developer of the atomic bomb) are hauled off to prison and later put to death for the creation of lethal autonomous weaponry?

As the Honorable Supreme Court of India has ban the selling of the crackers in and near by Delhi (Delhi, Delhi-NCR). There is strong socio-cultural affinity with the crackers during Deepawali festival and in other occasions. By this way crackers are considered as essential ingredient of enjoyment. Therefore, huge acceptability for smokeless crackers. But what sort of possibility is available for smokeless/eco-friendly crackers is an important question to answer. So please en-light this topic and concern.

Suppose someone who is duly sentenced to die got excellent legal representation except for one minor point--her lawyer dozed off for five minutes during her trial. Should this small lapse be a good enough reason to throw out her conviction and demand a new trial?

The penumbra doctrine has been decisive in cases such as Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges.

We come across many scratches on motor vehicles in accident cases. We in forensic reports just say whether the scratch was fresh or old based on oxide formation or deposition of dust . Is there any scientific method to calculate age of such scratches in hours, days,weeks  and months for giving precise evidence to the court.

Psychological report for court i personnel selection

I am looking for a database where patent law cases and specifics regarding such cases are housed. Information within the database could be something like the parties involved (including representation), and outcome of the case?