Science topic
Coronary Artery Disease - Science topic
Coronary Artery Disease are pathological processes of CORONARY ARTERIES that may derive from a congenital abnormality, atherosclerotic, or non-atherosclerotic cause.
Questions related to Coronary Artery Disease
I’m currently preparing for academic promotion, and one of my papers is close to increasing my H-index.
If you’re working in the field of cardiac imaging, MPI or CTA, and find this article relevant, I would truly appreciate your citation.
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
Thank you for your scientific support!
Farnaz Fariba, MD – Associate Professor
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Coronary artery disease raised from blockage of coronary vessels , leading to MI and death.
Plaques form due to a self-healing mechanism of blood vessels and will increase over time. When entering blood vessels, they block blood flow, lead to hypertension and decrease blood flow to organs such as the heart. To get rid of these plaques, we need to boost the good cholesterol such as HDL or improve health of liver to produce enzymes that move these plaques. So, what other ways to get rid of these plaques without using invasive methods?
Thanks and best regards.
Keywords: AHA/ACC formula, 10-year Coronary Artery Disease risk estimate.
What is the best strategy - tredamill stress test or chemical stress with dipyridamole or dobutamine?
I need Coronary Angiogram Images(CAI) publically available dataset.
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a condition of the heart due to atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is the narrowing of arteries (Aorta, LAD, LCX, RCA) of the heart because of plaque formation, due to cholesterol and fat penetrating the inner walls of arteries. Early diagnosis of CAD is very important if unattended leads to heart attack/death. Coronary Angiogram Images(CAI) are used by physicians in the penetrating to identify exact status of CAD.
keeping Pros and Cons of statins in mind as per recent evidences, I request you to answer the question."Is it appropriate to use statins for primary prevention of coronary artery disease?
Thanking you.
Hi!
I am trying to measure hemolysis in plasma using Beckmann Coulter DU 800 spectrophotometer at 414nm, 541 nm and 576 nm for my miRNA study . The blood was centrifuged twice and processed within 20 minutes of collection. I have used distilled water as blank. However, I am observing a high absorbance (ranging from 0.8 to 1.5). Litereature suggest that absorbance more than 0.2 is an indication of hemolysis. My samples were visibly clear with no signs of hemolysis. Can anyone help me in understanding this unusual observation.
Thank you very much !
Chitra
What's the most easy to use computational fluid dynamics analysis package for coronary artery blood flow analysis? can anyone offer any advice on some comercial or free software packages? i want to visual blood flow changes in coronary artery diseases.
for early detection of MI showing highly specificity and sensitivity marker i want to do case control study of CAD patients i want to know the correct sample size
Comparing the relevance of medical information about ischemic heart disease retrieved by 2 search engines: Google and Bing
Introduction
As the connection quality and internet availability are improving, more and more patients tend to use search engines to retrieve medical information about their health issues through search engines. However, most patients are hardly able to acquire essential knowledge as effectively as an experienced search engine user nor can they confirm the validity of the retrieved medical information. Accordingly, identifying the relevance of retrieved medical information with efficiency is very important for patients to improve the communicative quality with clinicians so as to make better decisions on their health issues.
Objective
The study was to compare the relevance of medical information retrieved by 2 search engines: Google and Bing and to help non-professional patients seek out pertinent medical information about ischemic heart disease.
Method and material
We conducted 2 online searches using Google and Bing search engines to collect retrieved web pages in 100 rankings through loading keywords “ischemic heart disease” and its equivalent term “coronary artery disease” in Feb 2018. Commercials, adverts, text over 32,767 characters, images or videos were excluded out of our study.
The relevance of information was evaluated by 6 indicators which include pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and risk factors with reference to the main page about ischemic heart disease of Wikipedia. Each indicator consisted of a series of keywords such as “ECG” or “myocardial” to indicate the relevance of medical information on the page. All websites were categorized into commercial (.com and .co.) and non-commercial (.gov, .edu and .org) via their top level domains.
A total of 200 pages evenly collected by Google and Bing search engines were investigated, managed and analysed by Microsoft Excel 2010 and Chi-squared was applied to show the significance among collected data.
Results and conclusion
Commercial websites (.com or .co.) were more likely to be retrieved than non-commercial websites (.edu, .gov and .org) by Bing search engines (p<0.05), but no statistical difference in number between commercial and non-commercial websites through Google search engine. Furthermore, dot edu websites retrieved by Google engine provided lower relevant medical information about ischemic heart disease in comparison with commercial websites. Likewise, dot.gov pages retrieved by Bing search engine provided less relevant medical information than commercial websites. Both carried significant difference in statistics (p<0.05).
Combining pages collected by two search engines, non-Commercial websites did not provide more relevant information about ischemic heart disease than commercial websites. The relevance of medical information on top 25 ranking websites searched by Bing had no difference from that by Google search engine, but on the following pages from 26 to 100, Bing provided more relevant medical information about ischemic heart disease than that by Google (p<0.05).
Discussion
Search engines with different settings bring about distinctive results, so being aware of the relevance of retrieved medical information provided by search engines is critical for patients to improve their communicative quality with clinicians.
A number of search engine users tend to preconceive commercial websites provide less relevant medical information and mostly they believe non-commercial websites such as educational or governmental websites should provide more relevant medical information on the pages, however our study showed commercial websites provided more relevant medical information than non-commercial websites (.edu, gov or .org) in general. Educational websites by Google or governmental websites by Bing provided less relevant medical information in comparison with other categories of websites.
In terms of page rankings, amateur seekers tend to concentrate on the top 10 ranking pages with minimal interest in further searching the following pages but our study showed top 30 ranking pages gave equivalent relevance on pages no matter with Google or Bing search engine.
Keywords: ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, Bing, Google, search engine
These hyaline arterioles are powerful markers for risk of coronary artery disease.
At what dose do we see the antiinflammatory effects of statins in CAD? Importantly, how do we monitor this activity? Is the fasting lipid panel an adequate measure?
Can in future combined CT FFR and CT coronary angiography replace invasive coronary angiography for diagnosis of CAD ?
According to available literature statins have equivocal effects on the risk of acute pancreatitis development. There are no RCTs available studying statins in acute pancreatitis. How would you perform database search to try to determine this effect by meta-analysis? Which search terms and type of studies would you include? Thank you.
Just a question I came across whilst going through readings.
Coronary artery diseases including myocardial infarction (MI) have been recognized as a major health problem in the world. The patients may experience mental and emotional problems like depression and anxiety at different periods of hospitalization that can negatively affect other important characteristics and medical parameters in patients with myocardial infarction and increase patients’ spiritual needs. Is there any association of spiritual wellbeing with anxiety and depression of patients with myocardial infarction? Coronary artery diseases including myocardial infarction (MI) have been recognized as a major health problem in the world. The patients may experience mental and emotional problems like depression and anxiety at different periods of hospitalization that can negatively affect other important characteristics and medical parameters in patients with myocardial infarction and increase patients’ spiritual needs. Is there any association of spiritual wellbeing with anxiety and depression of patients with myocardial infarction?
I am planning to operate 18 year old female with coarctation of aorta with isthmic hypoplasia, subclavian artery narrowed 90% at its origin and aortic diameter between SCA and left common carotid artery about 6mm. Gradient across coarct segment 85mm. Any suggestions regarding best surgical methodology of this patient.
I try to diagnosis of coronary artery disease using fuzzy expert system, how to calculate accuracy
Despite our attempts to modify some risk factors of coronary artery di.ase,there remains a large proportion of patients left with residual risks that may mostly reach 65% or more.So,We need innovative approach to manage residual risks.Novel emerging risk factors and their mamnagement via nanobiotechnology may provide promise in decreasing residual risk.
We are looking for any lab who has experience with ES cells differentiation to Macrophages. We are interested in cholesterol efflux in Macrophages.
Thank you in advance.
Ticagrelor and prasugrel have been advised in STEMI and NSTE-ACS after PCi. what about SCAD??
Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) the myocardial ischemia causes an inflammatory response, which is a predictor of mortality and myocardial remodeling. Treatment with statins have been shown to be able to reduce the area at risk by reducing inflammation in hypercholesterolemic patients with unstable angina. It is unknown whether the anti-inflammatory effect can really reduce the size of myocardial necrosis in STEMI and if this is due to the anti-inflammatory effect of statins. What would be the best way to advance in the anti-inflammatory strategy for treating STEMI?
The high cost of diagnostic methods, even of biochemical markers, limit many of the tools necessary for the diagnosis of CAD, especially if we consider the group of low-risk patients. Can CRP be a cost-effective strategy, as some studies have shown, to stratify these low-risk patient groups and separate which should effectively continue the investigation to elucidate the presence of CAD?
Measuring the amount of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) can be a novel parameter that is inexpensive and easy to obtain and may be helpful in cardiovascular risk stratification. However, the relationship between epicardial fat and cardiac function and that between epicardial fat and cardiac risk factors is less well described.
Is coronary revascularization necessary for patients with well-developed coronary collaterals and coronary artery disease?

Some interventional cardiologists have mentioned patients with this condition frequently. In our Institute the same occurs.
The essential logic is to decrease the time of exposure to cardiovascular risk factors with genetic insights providing strong justification for this approach. Lifetime exposure to lower concentrations of cholesterol specifically, plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, is shown to be associated with larger reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease. The decrease in risk is related to the genetic variants of receptors that remove cholesterol from the circulation matched with individuals who do not carry such variants. For a known reduction in LDL cholesterol, there was much more impact on reduction in cardiovascular disease risk than that reached with pharmacotherapeutic modulation in late life. Several studies have shown that the adoption of a healthy life , the act of not smoking, weight control and perform regular physical activity , with the reduction of cholesterol levels can be more effective than drug therapy of known effectiveness. How best to link these two strategies and show people that the protection of their coronary health goes beyond the use of drugs ?
With the increasing use of echocardiographic contrast for both endocardial border delineation , and in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion , we are faced with the indication for the procedure in pregnant women. Logically the contraindication due to the use of medication in the first quarter is present , but from there in situations where the examination is absolutely necessary. What to do? How far is safe use of echocardiographic contrast ?
I'm currently researching on left ventricle motion quantification. Can anyone suggest me any heart or left ventricle localization method in tagged cardiac MRI images? Appreciate if you can provide me references too. Thanks.
Although the association of HR and outcome is suggestive, it does not, by itself, prove causality. High HR also is associated with poor cardiorespiratory fitness or impaired cardiac function. Indeed, exercise capacity itself is a powerful predictor of mortality, and resting HR is lower in individuals who undertake vigorous leisure activities or participate in sports. Therefore, in recent studies significantly relating HR and mortality, adjustments have been made for the effects of physical activity and cardiac function. In the Cooper Clinic Mortality Risk Index, high HR and low cardiorespiratory fitness were both independent predictors of mortality. Relatively high HR often is found together with other cardiovascular risk factors, notably hypertension, an atherogenic blood lipid profile, blood glucose and insulin levels, and overweight. Indeed, HR correlates with the number of cardiovascular risk factors presenting in an individual.
My understanding is, when the myocadium cells lack of blood supply, the cell will be damaged but to some degree, it's still reversible. When the blood flow recovered, the cell can become alive again. When the ischemia is serious to a certain stage, the cell will die completely. Thus even the blood flow recover, the cell cannot gain live again, call irresversible. (if these are not true, please kindly correct me)
And my question is, for a specific patient, how to judge if his ischemia is reversible, irreversible? E.g. by using some imaging machines??
Use of statins for treatment of familial homozygous hypercholesterolemia: What is the earliest age for initiating statin therapy and what is the maximum dose used in young children.
I want know how many genes for responding cardio vascular diseases, diagnosis and what are the genes expressed myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease can tell me whom are working these relevant working
Should the presence of an epicardial fat pad measurement by 2D ECHO be an additional risk factor for Coronary artery disease, and can it be a predictor of other cardiovascular events?
Recently published guidelines de-emphasize use of coronary calcium to predict cvd risk. However, some studies underlying these recommendations show higher event rates for intermediate FRS and zero CACS than studies not considered in developing the guidelines. This may partly be due to Greenland using 6mm slices and, perhaps missing some calcium and wrongly assigning patients to the 0 CACS category. Conversely, the guidelines emphasize the more modest increase in risk with CACS above 300 compared to the highest FRS category. However, this could be seen as a straw man argument. What about CACS >1000? This is highly predictive of vastly increased CVD risk. Perhaps CACS screening on a one time or repeat basis should be routine.
If yes, what do they cost? I would like to know how much newer generation DES are in Iran.
Is there any proven pathological correlation between coronary artery diseases and H.pylori Vac positive strains?
Question is in regard to assessment of risk from major adverse outcome in athletes, as well as the making decision on implantation of ICD
Recent studies have shown to be feasible the use of thrombolysis by ultrasound. This is really a new therapeutic window? What we need to move forward to achieve this purpose?
Hi,
I have young cad affected subjects with the mean age of 42 years, which I have matched to 5 years older subjects with the mean age of 47 years. Is it the right way of doing it or do we need to do an exact age matching?
Is it only applicable in genetic biomarker studies, but not in protein biomarker studies?
And while matching the samples age should I consider current age or age at onset of the disease?
Recent studies have reported an increased use of 3D stress echo in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. This method really is ready for use in clinical practice?
I have 4 similar cases in which chest pain persisted at effort and small ischemic area was shown by scintilography. I made closure of the branches using coil embolization with successful angiographic and clinical results.
I want to know whether the types of repeat revascularization affect the outcomes. (It should, but I haven't find the evidence) Most studies focused on the types of inital revascularization, let's say, PCI or CABG, but I haven't see the studies on the influence of repeat revascularization on the outcomes. Anyone heard some studies? Thank you in advance!
Recently the micrornas had been studied in human diseases including atherosclerosis. I wonder how it impacts the evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease?
Do you have experience with stent implantation?
I wonder how much stress echo is appropriate in managing patients with CAD.
In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, those with MS were more likely to be female, have a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, and have a lower left ventricular ejection fraction and higher Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score. Since the MS has a negative long-term impact on cardiovascular mortality and reinfarction in patients with ACS, it can be used as a marker of cardiovascular mortality in patients with ACS and aggressively targeted.
A 50-year old pat. with h/o smoking and mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease some 25years go was admitted to the chest pain unit with NSTEMI. Cath showed a thrombus in the left main stem with TIMI III flow. Aggressive antiplatelet therapy was instituted and repeat angio was performed four days later showing a size reduction of the thrombus.
Given the fact that this patient has a low Syntax score what would you recommend?
Watchful waiting with antiplatelet therapy and repeat angio in several weeks or months or DES therapy or double mammary bypass?
I would like to know about the strategies that are being developed to evaluate the role of peri-coronary fat in the development of coronary artery disease, mainly on the use of cardiac imaging and biochemical markers.
In general the patients are elderly people. I prefer to use rivaroxaban, but the risk of bleeding is high. Do you have other choice?
I'm interested to know if you can add strain to stress echocardiography to improve the accuracy of the method for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and the best strategy (longitudinal strain, radial, circumferential, or combination of two or all of them)?
When conventional PTCA is feasible, PTCRA appears to confer no additional benefits. There is limited published evidence and no long-term data to support the routine use of PTCRA in in-stent re-stenosis. Compared to angioplasty alone, PTCRA/PTCA did not result in a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events, but patients were more likely to experience vascular spasm, perforation and transient vessel occlusion. In certain circumstances (e.g. patients ineligible for cardiac surgery, those with architecturally complex lesions, or those with lesions that fail PTCA), PTCRA may achieve satisfactory re-vascularisation in subsequent procedures.
Body-mass index (BMI) and diabetes have increased worldwide, whereas global average blood pressure and cholesterol have decreased or remained unchanged in the past decades.
For decades the usefulness of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium protocol in cardiac surgery has been discussed.
This subject is controversial. There is not a multicenter, randomized study to confirm its usefulness.
This protocol has shown efficacy in some studies, as in the off pump coronary artery bypass, surgery of aortic valve replacement with left ventricular hypertrophy, so on. The same benefit was found even in diabetic patients.
Some studies refute these benefits.
I believe that the discussion in this area is controversial because of protocol diversity in different medical centers.
What is your experience in this regard?
What is the protocol that is used in your institution?
Do you have data about its usefulness in patients with in preoperative impaired cardiac output (EF <40%)?
Analyses suggest there are important health benefits to exceeding the current exercise recommendations for health (≥750 MET minutes per week or ≥1.8 MET-hours/d rather than just satisfying them 450 to 750 MET minutes per week). These health benefits include reductions in disease mortality that are not traditionally associated with walking, including both heart failure and dysrhythmias.
In some circumestanses, it would be important to assess the client's state of change.
From medical treatment to CABG, considering also percutaneous angioplasty, management of spontaneous dissection of coronary arteries, especially during or after pregnancy, is not standardized. In clinical practice, how to do with such condition?
Various studies have failed to show clear cut benefit in CVD endpoints in patients offered HDL raising therapies.
Studies continue to show that stents are implanted in patients who stand to gain little if any benefit.
What is the role of lipoprotein a in development of premature atherosclerosis and what interventions would help in correcting it?
Wondering if any one has recent data on prevention of readmissions in the CT surgery population? I have been doing a lit search and found a few things, but it looks like this area too is ripe for more data?
I'm looking for evidence based practice of occupational therapy in cardiac rehabilitation.
Although there are many articles showing the risk of use statins in primary prevention of coronary heart disease, many doctors prescribe statins for asymptomatic people with normal total cholesterol with low HDL and history of coronary atherosclerosis in family. I prefer phisical exercises and diet.
According to the ADA´s guidelines from 1998, asymptomatic diabetic patients with risk factors should be subjected to a test to detect cardiac ischemia. However, these recommendations were not based on scientific evidence. What is your opinion on what should be done to these patients?
I am working on a project that is based on expression of specific proteins SUR2A and Kir6.2 in mice heart with altered hypoxia conditions. At the same time I would like to know whether the oxygen levels that I choose is exactly the same in blood as that of air in the hypoxia chamber. So I was looking for some methods or equipments that I can use to measure significantly the levels of blood oxygen.
For my research on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring I want to calculate the CAC mass score. Therefore I need a calibration factor for 100 kV CT scans. Does a standardized calibration factor exist for 100 kV Coronary Artery Calcium scans?
I found a log summary through google in which such calibration factors where considered. See the attached document.
Coronary artery calcium is a definite evidence of coronary arterioslcerosis process within the coronaries. Absence of CAC is associated with a very good prognosis, hence many further work-up can be omitted or delayed.
I am doing logistic regression with disease outcome with outcome variables and gene loci polymorphisms and various serum parameters as the explanatory variables. I have used SPSS and R for this purpose. On using the locus, the results are collective and show significance, but when we considier the polymorphism data as a categorical variable (wild type, heterozygous, homozygous mutatnt), SPSS gives results for only two alleles (wild type and heterozygous) while giving no result (citing redundancy?) for the third allele (homozygous mutant). On using R, the opposite is observed, results are displayed the other way around (observed for heterozygous and homozygous mutant, but no results for wild type). Can anyone help me sort out this problem?