Questions related to Conversion
I am currently looking at attenuation of light with depth in different materials and have several measurement datasets I need to synthesize. I am mainly looking at attenuation coefficients where k_total = k_scattering + k_absorption. However, one of my data sets is only presented in terms of the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index of the material. I know there is a conversion from m_imaginary to k_absorption via the relation k_abs = (4pi/lambda(nm))*m_im, but I can't seem to find a relation for the real part of the refractive index. I know this corresponds to scattering, but I am wondering if there is a precise relation like that for the real part of the refractive index?
How calculate protein content? Why N conversion factor for estimation of the protein content of grain vary based on analytical methods and crop types?
We are desperately trying to get bands for PCR utilizing cell free plasma DNA extracted from cancer patients. After Bisulfite conversion, the PCR did not show any band. What could be the reason for that?
Im working on chemical reaction engineering. My raw material concentration is analysed by HPLC, after that i got conversion of raw material. Whereas product is analysed by GC MS. So how can i calculate yield of product?
I did ELISA for AST and ALT liver enzymes and the results are plotted in ng or pg/ml but I require these results to be in Units/L. Could anyone help?
Thanks in advance
I am working on a project where I am able to perform conversion of NIFTI to JNIFTI file. These are neuroimaging files that require conversion so that I could integrate this into NiBabel, which is a package that gives access to some common medical and neuroimaging file formats. How can I perform this conversion in Python?
I am a student pursuing a master degree in psychology (conversion). I am interested in how human have their own unique styles in making a decision or solving a problem.
According to the Brief-COPE assessment, there are 3 major styles; problem-based, emotion-based, and avoidance. My question is about how to interpret the result.
1. What does it mean about showing percentile of each style and why is it essential?
2. How to say prefer which style to the others as each sub-scale holds unequal number of items?
3. Can a person possess all styles?
I am looking for reliable data processing to convert cubic meters of Quercus cerris (Hungarian oak) wood into CO2 equivalent. Thank you.
I have been performing the adhesion studies for my polymeric patches in the TA.XT plus texture analyser instrument.
The unit displayed for the adhesion force is in newton (N) or kilogram (Kg). I need to convert the newton unit to a pascal or kilopascal unit. Can anyone let me know the mathematical conversion for this?
It is commonly said in the literature that BCNT relies on the collision of 10B with thermal neutrons to yield the following reaction, in which 11B is described as unstable.
10B + n° → [11B] → 7Li + 4He + gamma ray
I was wondering how the 11B could be so unstable after conversion from a 10B considering that usually 11B is said to have a natural abundance of 80% and to be a stable isotope of boron.
Any explanation about this phenomenon would be welcome.
I dealuminated proton form of ZSM-5 and achieved a good conversion with zero trace of fructose, but when it was modified with a Lewis Acid metal (Sn), the conversion decreased with a trace of fructose (<2%). Sn is Lewis Acid and its inclusion is supposed to influence the rate of isomerization of Glucose to fructose effectively, but it's the other way round. Any suggestions to this result please?
Please suggest me some eminent groups working on photocatalytic chemical conversions like hydrogen evolution or carbon dioxide to methanol or N2 to ammonia
Producing a standard score for a neuropsych test normally involves browsing norms tables, finding a particular table that matches a demographic, finding the appropriate raw to standard conversion, then manual entry. Unfortunately, this process can be quite error prone.
Is it possible to instead use a calculated field and lookup tables to both (1) choose the correct table of normative data and (2) choose the correct standard score for a given raw score?
I came to this question as I took a role of respondent recently. The researcher presented his research topic and he guided a conversation, so he had questions in mind to which he needs to hear my answers. The interview was ended a bit abruptly, but I assume that had happened not before he had his answers. Though.... I still had some things to say, which in my opinion were important in order to represent my personal case on the matter. As a respondent, am I allowed to say something to the researcher if in my opinion he is skipping something important for the topic of our conversation? I have had respondents to comment questions in my questionnaire what had given me an extra perspective so I was glad about that. But today, when I was in the role of a respondent I started doubting a bit, and started wondering how others see the role of respondent, what "rights" does one have in a research interview?
We carried out following reaction where the amine formation from bromine compound , we have analyzed MALDI mass, showing final conversion in mass spectra and IR spectroscopy showing free amine strechings at 3428cm-1 and 3339 cm-1 but there is no stronger broad peak in H1NMR at designeted delta value.
Any kind of suggetions are welcome.
Hello researchers !
Could you please explain me or help me get the references or books about the basics and fundamentals of time decay/ PL life time/ decay time processes of PL downconversion ?
kindly help me , get some references!
Is there any standard mechanism for time decay?
How are increasing and decreasing time decay measured with a fixed excitation for a particular emission related to concentration of activator ions?
please help me understand this!
Thank you all !
Can anyone please help me out in plotting an energy graph in gromacs, the problem is that I've simulated my system for 1 microsecond and since at every 2 pico second the output is written, my energy.xvg is a huge data file. In order to plot a significant data, I want to plot the energy curve with a scale of 1 unit=10ns on the x-axis.
So, please suggest me a conversion method for the pico second data to be written in nano seconds so that the analysis is simplified.
Thanks in advance
Have a good day!
Let's think about something like this: Can we get another speed and amount of light using the speed and amount of light? While I was taking attendance at my friend's student dormitory, I thought about the possibility of an object interacting with light, creating a light length depending on the object, and thus going on forever. What thing in the universe can be equivalent to the intensity and speed of a light, that is, a photon? Or, with a different question, how could the photon and the speed of light be formed? If light is reflected from the photon interaction with an object, what do we deduce from this? How can we obtain a different light speed and intensity from here? Let's think: We said that what could be equivalent to the intensity and speed of a light, namely a photon, in the universe, the reflection between the light and the object would also change depending on the motion. So it would change depending on the acceleration because the faster I move, the faster and farther the reflection between the light and the object would have the potential to travel. So how do you get another speed of light from a photon? If a light creates a light reflection depending on the acceleration, that is, the change in motion depending on the object, there must be no acceleration in order for there to be a counter-light speed in the universe. To think of a counter-speed of light, that is, an unconstant speed of light in the universe, we need to find a place where there is no acceleration. that is, a place where there is no gravity, so our universe is actually suitable for the opposite speed of light. So how do we find the opposite speed of light in the universe? If the normal speed of light is dependent on acceleration in the universe, that is, if a = c'2, the counter acceleration will be a not = c'2. So what happens when that happens? The point in the universe from F=m.a to F=E will be F=NOT E. that is, there will be a universe where force is not equal to energy. So how does such a universe work? What if force is not equal to energy? Let's first look at what happens when force equals energy. When force equals energy, it will be necessary to create the speed of light due to motion. When force is not equal to energy, it will be necessary to create the speed of light that does not depend on motion. The speed of light, which is not dependent on motion, will result from the conversion of accelerated motion to the speed of light. In that case, the light transforms within itself in the universe; From the speed of light, which is not dependent on motion, the speed of light due to motion occurs, and thus acceleration is needed. Because it consists of accelerated motion. Thanks.
Şöyle bir şey düşünelim: Işığın hızını ve miktarını kullanarak bir başka ışık hızı ve miktarı elde edebilir miyiz? Bunu dostumun öğrenci yurdunda yoklama alırken bir nesnenin ışıkla etkileşerek ışığın nesneye bağlı olarak ışık uzunluğu oluşturması ve böylece sonsuza kadar gidebilme ihtimalini düşünmüştüm Peki doğada böyle bir şey farklı yönden olabilir mi? Evrende hangi şey bir ışığın yani fotonun şiddetine ve hızına eşdeğer olabilir? veya farklı soruyla, foton ve ışık hızı nasıl oluşuyor olabilir? Eğer bir nesneyle fotonun etkileşiminden ışık nesneye göre yansıyorsa buradan ne çıkartırız?Buradan nasıl farklı bir ışık hızı ve şiddeti elde edebiliriz? Düşünelim: Evrende hangi şey bir ışığın yani fotonun şiddetine ve hızına eşdeğer olabilir demiştik ışıkla nesne arasındaki yansıma harekete bağlı olarak da değişecekti. Yani ivmeye bağlı olarak değişecekti çünkü ben ne kadar hızlı hareket edersem ışık ve nesne arasındaki yansıma o kadar daha hızlı ve uzağa gitme potansiyeli taşıyacaktı.Öyleyse bir ışıktan yani fotondan bir başka ışık hızı nasıl elde edilir? Eğer bir ışık , nesneye bağlı olarak ivmeye yani hareket değişikliğine bağlı olarak ışık yansımasını oluşturuyorsa evrende karşı bir ışık hızı olması için ivmenin olmaması gerekir. Evrende karşı bir ışık hızı yani sabit olmayan bir ışık hızı düşünmek için ivmelenmenin olmadığı bir yer bulmamız gerekir. yani yerçekiminin olmadığı bir yenr o halde evrenimiz aslında karşıt ışık hızı için müsaittir. O halde evrendeki karşıt ışık hızını nasıl bulacağız? Normal ışık hızı evrende ivmelenmeye bağlı ise yani a =c'2 ise karşıt ivmelenme a not = c'2 olacaktır. Peki böyle olduğunda ne olacaktır? Evrende F=m.a dan F=E olan nokta F=NOT E olacaktır. yani kuvvetin enerjiye eşit olmadığı bir evren olacaktır. Peki böyle bir evren nasıl çalışır? Kuvvet enerjiye eşit değilse ne olur? Önce kuvvet enerjiye eşit olduğunda ne olur ona bakalım bunun için. kuvvet enerjiye eşit olduğunda harekete bağlı ışık hızı yaratmak gerecektir. kuvvet enerjiye eşit olmadığında harekete bağlı olmayan ışık hızı yaratmak gerekecektir. Harekete bağlı olmayan ışık hızı ise ivmelenmiş hareketin ışık hızına dönüşmesinden meydana gelecektir. O halde ışık kendi içinde dönüşüme uğrar evrende ; harekete bağlı olmayan ışık hızından harekete bağlı ışık hızı meydana gelir ve böylece ivmelenmeye ihtiyaç duyulur. Çünkü ivmelenmiş hareketten oluşur. Teşekkürler.
I trying a reaction to protect 5'-OH of a modified nucleoside with DMT-Cl and DIPEA in pyridine. I have used 2 eq of DMT-Cl for 24 hour at room temperature. But the reaction is still incomplete. I have found a lot of starting material unreacted after monitoring by TLC. How can I reach the completion of this reaction?
Hi, everyone! I have a question about Aspen HYSYS / Unisim Design: What's rate units means? I work with heterogeneous catalytic reactions in a plug flow reactor (PFR), and most of these reactions are specified with kg,catalyst instead of volume. And these simulation softwares have cubic meter (m³) in rate units.
My question is: This cubic meter it's about what? Cubic meter of the reactor? Cubic meter of the catalyst? I need to know that information for units conversion (kg,catalyst to volume).
I oxidize limonene in a 3-neck round flask, the main neck is connected to the condenser, I heat the limonene, catalyst (CuY or CuO/Y) at 60-70 Celsius Degree for 4, 6, 8, 10 hours. All of the samples (gas chromatography method) show high conversion rate but really low selectivity. Can anyone tell me how to increase it?
I am doing LIVE/DEAD staining of biofilms on different surfaces and taking z stack images by CSLM ( Olympus Fluoview FV1000).
Then I am using COMSTAT to estimate biomass thickness roughness coefficient etc.
I am following the procedure detailed on COMSTAT 2.1 manual for making the stacks and image conversion and so, but I am getting different values for these parameters depending on the channel (red of green), and the two value are sometimes very different.
Is this usual or I am doing something wrong?
While methylation of the fats for fatty acid analysis, what is the possibility of conversion of a saturated straight chain fatty acid to a branched chain fatty acid. Because after fatty acid analysis the results are showing more of branched chain fatty acids. For example my sample are detected with Isolauric Acid and Isomyristic acid rather than Lauric and Myristic acid.
According to (USEPA IRIS 2011), the toxicity responses (dose responses) to heavy metals are given as the oral reference dose (RfD) and oral slope factor (SF)) by (mg/kg/day) and (mg/kg-day)1, respectively.
Does a health risk assessment (carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic analysis) require unit conversion from mg/l to mg/kg?
In other words, what is the unit of concentration of heavy metals to be used in all stages of the assessment of the risks of heavy metals ?
Can any one suggest me a good discussion site or anyone willing to discuss regarding this?
I have a series of doubts in ammonia to Hydrogen conversion.
I am looking for journals/special issues that satisfy the following-
1. Scopes: human-computer interaction, conversational agent, relational agent, virtual agent, mobile technology, pervasive computing, etc.
2. Rank: Q1
3. Review Process: Rapid
4. Publication Type: Hybrid/Open Access
I do apologize. wrong question already was asked .The correct question is as follows:
I want to extract precipitation, runoff and temperature data from nc format to text or excel for my study area
I did this several times in GIS, but it gave me figures that were unexpected. I don't know what conversion should be done on these figures.
I will be appreciated for any help
Thank you in advance for your replies.
I am looking for the conversion of microplastic and nanoplastic particles whose concentrations in experiments are measured in particles/mL or particles/L to microgram/L.
There is a conversion formula which is used in case of Au and Ag particles, but I assume the same cannot be applied here since they are microplastics.
All answers are welcome to solve this conversion.
I know that THP-1 cells become adherent after exposure to PMA. Aside from this, are there any gross morphological characteristics that can be assessed by simple bright field microscopy? The vast majority of the cells attached to the substratum are ovoid in appearance, however there is a subset of the population that often exhibits two or more lateral processes, while some a almost completely flat with multiple processes. Is there a distinction between these cells? Does this morphological change become more pertinent after polarization of M0 to M1 and M2 as well? Conversely, is this merely representative of a more broad variability within the population?
Reaction of I with palladium acetate, 1,3-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)propane (DCPP), K2CO3, water and NMP under 30 psi of carbon monoxide at 120 C gives II. Please explain the mechanism for the conversion. thanks in advance.
what are the challenges and opportunities in implementation of conversational marketing for the promotion of any brand, please give your valuable suggestions.
According to the studies, I have followed they described it as 'the estimation assumed 80% extraction efficiency (Kemp, 2006), 10% postharvest loss, and oil yield conversion of 1 kg ha−1 to 0.439 L volume biodiesel'.
Can anyone share the procedure?
The “green economy” is a fashionable economic opportunity that is mainly framed in the political discourse. Renewable, efficient energy sources and environmental protection are listed among its themes. Since those themes also have scientific implications that transcend economic policies, perhaps, it might be interesting to try and size some purely scientific issues.
To address a specific point, I wonder whether “efficiency” and “environmental impact” boil down to replacing fossil fuels with solar, wind, nuclear, …, energy in general, or whether the above words also mean that the conversion efficiency can be adjusted so that each type of power consumer is supplied by an adequate type of source. Joule, Rankine, Kelvin, and others reasoned that only the production of motive power matters, such as the motive power of chemical action, for example, and ventured into the determination of the mechanical equivalent of heat. Is the current task of dealing with conversion efficiency compatible with energy conservation? Or else, when having in mind to match the available sources to various different purposes is there a need to revise the concept of energy?
Hi, I'm doing bisulfite sequencing to study DNA methylation status of my target gene.
I'm using QIAamp DNA Mini kit(QIAGEN) for obtaining gDNA samples and EZ DNA Methylation-Lightning Kit(Zymo Research) for bisulfite conversion.
As protocol from zymo said that 200~500ng gDNA 20ul is optimal condition for bisulfite conversion, I'm using 200~500ng gDNA(sometime 500ng if my gDNA concentration is enough, but sometime I use around 200~300ng if my gDNA concentration is low.)
My problem is I think I'm getting unexpected results.
In my lab I'm the first person to study DNA methylation and use such kind of kits, I'm trying to get same, or similar results from previously published paper before I get results of my target gene.
The gene used in the paper was highly methylated and methylation status of each CpG sites were around 60~90%(mostly 70, 80%)
But when I did sequencing, only 50% were methylated.
Also CpG sites from each colony was all methylated or all unmethylated.
(I mean, I tried sequencing from 8 colonies and results from 4 colonies said all of the CpG was methylated and results from rest of the colonies said all of the CpG was unmethylated-so I'm hard to trust my results.)
I don't think bisulfite reaction didn't work because almost of non-CpG cytosines was converted to uracil.
I think I'm doing something wrong with my expreiments, so I needs some advices.
1. Is gDNA around 200~300ng not sufficient to perform bisulfite conversion? I've heard that too less gDNA amount or too much bisulfite treating could cause conversion of methylated cytosin to uracil. If it's not sufficient, how much would be optimal?
2. Is it common to get only all-or-none methylated result as me?
3. I didn't use RNaseA during extracting gDNA so maybe some RNA will be remaining in my gDNA. Would this be big problem?
4. Are there some other factors that could be a cause of unsuccessful or unreliable bisulfite conversion/sequencing? (There would be a lot, but I want to check if I'm missing something.)
If you have any other ideas or advices to perform successful bisulfite sequencing, I would like to know it whatever it is. Thank you for reading long question.
I have completed dynamic 1H NMR experiments to study a reaction in DMSO. I have obtained my rates and rate constants for various temperatures and calculated the thermodynamic parameters for my second order reaction which is an SN2 reaction.
I have computed at DFT/B3LYP/6-311++g(d,p)/GD3 in DMSO (PCM) in Gaussian a scan which follows the reactants through the TS to the product. From this I have :
i) separate reagents, A and B
ii) the pre-reactive complex, A+B
iii) the TS, AB‡ (using QST3 and berny optimization, followed by IRC to confirm the reactants and products)
I calculated the rate constant using the following equation:
k=(kb·T)/h * EXP (-ΔG‡/RT)
I have two issues. The first is the above equation has units of s-1 and not M-1 s-1 for a second order reaction. Often it is stated in textbooks to include a unit conversion of 1/c0 where c0 has units of M using the equation below
k=(kb·T)/h *1/c0* EXP (-ΔG‡/RT)
But I'm not sure if this c0 was suppose to carry a value different from 1M.
The second issue is that the calculated rate constant I obtain is larger than my experimental value of 7.3 × 10−3 M-1 s-1. I have tried using the ΔG‡ as the difference between:
i) the TS and pre-reactive complex, but this results in an extremely large rate constant (1.33 × 102),
ii) the TS and separate reagents, much better approximation but still larger (1.24 × 10−2).
How do I match the theoretically calculated rate constant to experimental value with units of M-1 s-1. Is there a conversion I need to do or a different equation I need to use?
I’d appreciate any help, thank you in advance
Is there any conversion method or equation that I can use to convert free radicals concentration from M (or ppm) unit to spin/g? Any insight or suggestions regarding this will be highly appreciable.
forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 9 file C:\D\swatThesisP\test\Scenarios\Default\TxtInOut\000010001.sol
I have checked the format of file, all is ok but still this error appears every time?
I have a chlorophyll corrected Pmax measurement with the unit: µg C (µg Chl)–1 h–1, which I need to convert to µg O2 (µg Chl)–1 h–1, as it is needed for a DO model.
I haven't been able to find a conversion coefficient.
Thank you for your time and help.
whether nitrification inhibitor completely restrict the conversion from NH4-N to NO3-N or delay the conversion? if yes, to what extent be it will inhibit?
I have tried to use the conversion factor of 0.0079 which tends to work for sunlight but I'm aware that although the sad lamp is meant to mimick sunlight it isn't exactly the same, hence when trying to calculate power conversion efficiency ratings I'm getting ridiculous values. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I have a set of CT scans performed on a GE Revolution of bones of which I need to know Bone Mineral Density in gr/cm2. All I have is Hounsfield Units. Is there a way (software or similar) to obtain this conversion?
I want to convert methane without any sort of catalyst to another gas. can the researchers please share some guidelines to do that. Is it possible for this conversion
may be some mathematical data or some research papers that are on this topic are presented can be helpful too
I want to convert flow rate unit Cubic centimeters per minute to KPa. What would be the conversion for 60 SCCM of H2 in KPa.?
I tried converting seismic SAC data into SAF using Geopsy, but the results were not satisfactory. Is there any other way to do that conversion from SAC to SAF?
I want to collect a speech dataset of real world interview conversations between two persons. Which microphone / recording instrument is advisable for it so that it doesn't interfere with the process ? Please suggest
My phd research is leading me to speak with senior nurses that work at an executive level in other countries to gain an insight to their experience- to interview internationally - do I need to idenitfy the ethics application process per specific county?
Can I interview retired nurses?
or Could I have conversations with them and journal their reflections and include in my Phd?
any advice appreciated?
In the reaction of an aldehyde with malononitrile (Knoevenagel Condensation), the conversion calculation must be based on which of the raw materials (aldehyde or malononitrile)?
The goal of the academic research unit is to connect similar research ideas with technical expertise and funding to facilitate the generation of well-designed, ethical research. Historically, government and philanthropic organizations have been the main sources of funding driving research efforts at academic institutions that enable the generation of fair and unbiased scientific knowledge to the benefit of all its citizens. Institutional oversight ensures strong research- and ethical policy adherence within the borders of its mandate before any research is undertaken or subsequent findings published in formal, peer-reviewed journals. To the fullest extent, this process has resulted in the steady, albeit slow growth of a large, credible scientific knowledge base. Alarmingly, it has become evident that the era of "Big data" has overturned this important scientific paradigm.
The explosion of social media, the proliferation of digital computing devices, and almost universal internet access have resulted in the generation of massive amounts of data that in practice can be analysed by anyone at near real-time speed without institutional or governmental oversight, creating a slew of new ethical challenges. Proprietary algorithms developed by corporate incentives process massive amounts of data to reveal information about emerging social, economic and health trends that inform market strategies and product development. Currently, it is not known to which extent this information is shared or by whom.
These technological advancements offer both opportunity as well as challenges to academic researchers. Given the speed and the amount of data being generated today, are we as academic researchers able to keep up with industry-generated knowledge and standards while bound to the confines and processes of our oversight committees and current funding models? What are the obstacles and opportunities facing the academic research milieu that ensure its relevance in the age of technological advancement? This conversation has just started. Please share your thoughts and ideas below.
Do you agree? If not, can you provide better insight?
In the end, it will be our ability to adapt to our changing environments that will ensure the relevance of the academic research institution over the years to come.
Landing Page A with 1300 leads is achieving a 3% conversion rate Landing Page B with 1500 leads is achieving a 10% conversion rate
First, I want to see if I have achieved enough samples (Leads or conversions) to have a statistically valid test.
Second, I want to confirm that conversion rate for Landing Page B is statistically significant, so better than the obtained for Landing Page A.
How do I determine that the sample of leads and conversions obtained are statistically representative? What would be the minimum sample to get the same success in the conversion ratio?
I envision a system embedded within a speed bump. So, whenever a vehicle passes through the speed bump (mostly at low speed) his weight will serve as a force applying pressure on the piston within the speed bump. I see a potential here of generating energy. but you could help me understand more how pressure could converse to electrical energy
I want to convert *.msh OR *.cas file of Ansys fluent 2021R2 to OpenFOAM. I am using workbench 2021 R2.
I have used this conversion before with older Ansys versions by simply using *.msh OR *.cas file to OpenFOAM using 'fluent3DMeshToFoam' command.
I really appreciate any suggestion/help on this issue!
Hi... I would like to know if there is any scientific reference for the conversion typically used for the conversion from rainfall to snowfall? Based on the information I found on some websites, the rain-to-snow ratio depends on the air temperature, and typically from 27-34 ºF this ratio is 1:10, increasing with lower temperatures. (https://goodcalculators.com/rain-to-snow-calculator/)
But I would like to know what is the scientific base on these values? Or somebody knows any paper or official report in which this conversion has been used due to missing snowfall measurements?
I am interested in making calculations of non-radiative constants rates like internal conversion. There is a specific function on the Gaussian package that I can use for this purpose?
Or some other program?
I am working on a scientific paper and I wanna know which software(s) is most suited for drawing mechanical illustrations such as the ones attached below (graphs, networks, Experimental setups etc.). Preferably softwares that unable conversion to a LATEX/tikz environment.
Are there any research groups that have been manufacturing spot converters and are leading in this matter? Or who manufactured the best in terms of cost and size.
This can include any type of spot-size converters (gratings, tapers and micro-optics).
Hi, I am doing experiments to make SHG beam from an ultrashort pulse laser.
I use BBO crystal and lens to focus the beam into the crystal.
I found that the output beam is a very asymmetric (looks like a line shape) shape. It was not good beam quality.
How do people make good quality SHG beam shape after frequency conversion? Is there any simple but good method?
I am using INSAT 3D insolation data at L2C level for my research work and I am trying to visualize in MATLAB. In the data file it is clearly mentioned the unit of latitude and longitude is in 'meter' in X and Y variables in the data set. So, I am dividing with 111000 for the conversion from meter to degree but I found the output is wrong. If any one can please help me to understand the conversion. Also, I have attached the data file please have a look.